Page 910

Jane Kelsey: Court finds against Trade Minister on TPPA Secrecy; Chief Ombudsman wrongly upheld his unlawful decision

]]>

Source: Professor Jane Kelsey + Courts of New Zealand + Click here for the Full Judgment: Kelsey V The Minister of Trade (pdf)

The High Court today vindicted charges that Trade Minister Tim Groser acted unlawfully in his quest to keep all information about the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) secret. 

The case involved judicial review of Minister Groser’s refusal to release various categories of documents under the Official Information Act, which the first applicant Professor Jane Kelsey requested in January 2015.

The Minister said ‘no’ without looking at a single document, claiming he knew what they all contained and that releasing them would jeopardise New Zealand’s interests.

[caption id="attachment_6181" align="alignleft" width="150"]Professor Jane Kelsey. Professor Jane Kelsey.[/caption]

‘The Minister’s approach epitomises the contempt for democratic processes and accountability that has pervaded these negotiations’, said Professor Kelsey.

Justice Collins said: ‘the Act plays a significant role in Nerw Zealand’s constitutional and democratic arrangements. It is essential the Act’s meaning and purpose is fully honoured by those required to consider the release of official information.’[para 156(2)

In ordering the Minister to reconsider his decision His Honour said ‘the orders I have made reinforce to the Minister and other decision-makers the importance of discharging their responsibilities under the Act and promote future compliance’ [para 158(2)].

Because this was a judicial review, the court could not consider the substantive grounds on which the Minister relied, but provided guidance for his interpretation as he reconsiders the request.

The judge effectively reserved the right for either party to return to the court within six months for further orders if the Minister does not appear to have taken the message of the judgement on board. 

‘It’s cold comfort that the Minister will have to revisit the request, using a proper process and interpretation of the rules, after the negotiations have already concluded’, Professor Kelsey said. ‘His unlawful approach in circumventing the Official Information Act appears to have achieved its goal.’

Nevertheless, the Minister should now release at least some documents that can help inform the debate on the TPPA.

The court’s decision also has a longer-term precedent value. ‘It sends a message to this minister and his colleagues in the Executive that their legal obligations under the Act cannot be flouted just because they are politically inconvenient, and that people are prepared to challenge them if they do.’ 

Professor Kelsey suggests there are equally serious questions about the Chief Ombudsman’s failure to hold the Minister to account.

‘The Chief Ombudsman is meant to be a check on Executive power, not to legitimise its unlawful practices.’

‘That she could uphold such a seriously deficient interpretation of the Act, and delay the possiblity of a legal challenge for nearly five months while she reached that conclusion, shows the Office needs a serious overhaul.’

The Chief Ombudsman has still not reported on two categories of information that were omitted from her review of the Minister’s decision because she had not finalised her deliberations. That means they could not form part of the judicial proceedings.

Professor Kelsey described as ‘practically useless’ the Chief Ombudsman’s suggestions that a report on those matters is imminent, almost three months later, following several reminders and after the negotiations have been concluded.

These aspects of the request, as well as the Minister’s approach to the reconsideration, could form the basis of a supplementary approach to the court within the next six months.

‘I have updated the original request to the Minister dating to this week. Let’s hope the Minister now takes the law seriously and releases the raft of documents – and goes back to the other TPPA parties and asks them to rescind their secrecy memorandum.’

Background note:

The judicial review relates to an Official Information Act request lodged on 25 January 2015 seeking eight categories of documents, drawn from categories recommended by release by the European Ombudsman in parallel negotiations between the US and EU.

The Minister refused to release any of the information on 27 February 2015. The matter was referred to the Chief Ombudsman, who reported on 29 July 2015 upholding the Minister’s decision in relation to six of the categories and continuing her inquiry on two.

The court proceedings were lodged on 5 August 2015 by eight applicants: Consumer New Zealand, Ngati Kahungunu, Oxfam NZ, Greenpeace NZ, the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists, New Zealand Nurses Organisation, Tertuary Education Union, and Professor Kelsey. They sought Declarations that the Minister’s decision was unlawful, and Orders for the Minister to reconsider the decision.

The Court made an order quashing the Minister’s decision and directing him to reconsider the request in light of his interpretation of the provisions of the Act. In light of that order he considered it unnecessary to issue the Declarations sought by the Applicants, but reserved the right for the parties to return to the court within six months if supplementary or consequential orders are likely to be required. Costs were awarded to the Applicants.

]]>

NewsRoom Digest: Top NZ News Items for October 12, 2015

]]>

Newsroom Digest

This edition of NewsRoom_Digest features 14 resourceful links of the day and the politics pulse from Monday 12th October.

NEWSROOM_MONITOR

Top stories in the current news cycle include concerns being raised by the Labour Party about declining levels of community health support for people with mental health issues, the Parole Board postponing the next parole hearing for the country’s longest-serving prisoner – considered a high-risk sexual offender – by three years. and a report from the Auditor-General’s into reasons behind the uneven performance of Health Benefits Limited (HBL) in the health sector.

Note: As well as providing a precis of leading broadcast bulletins each day, our NewsRoom_Monitor service does a daily paper round with succinct ‘news picks’ from the main metropolitan papers emailed by 9am each morning. If you’re interested in a free trial please email monitor@newsroom.co.nz

POLITICS PULSE

Media releases issued from Parliament by political parties today included:

Government: PM welcomes Australian Prime Minister’s visit to NZ; Minister welcomes Niue Language Week; Central Otago and Southland conservation grants announced; Minister opens Cebu’s Red Cross logistics hub; NZ Condemns Terrorist Attack in Turkey; Recruitment for cancer support roles underway; NZ delegation to commemorate WWI in Niue; Roll of Honour for three Niuean First World War soldiers:Consultation begins on pharmacy 5 year plan; PM to visit Marrakech, Brussels and London 

Greens: Stronger rules and response needed to protect beaches from oil spills

Labour: Whanau Ora fails Maori; Emergency departments feel mental health stress;Big questions over explosion in subsidies for nannies and au pairs; Secret plans to bring back detainees; Poor regions to miss out on better internet; Generation Rent sees another hefty price rise

New Zealand First: Power outage a huge question mark over infrastructural investment; Sweet Chinese deal for Silver Fern Farms is sour for farmers

LINKS OF THE DAY

Links of the day have been a feature of NewsRoom_Digest since we first started production in August 2014 at newsroom-nz.tumblr.com. We are currently building an archive of these at:http://newsroomplus.com/resources/resourceful-links/

AG’S REPORT: The Auditor General has released a report into the performance of of Health Benefits Limited (HBL). The full report is available at: http://www.oag.govt.nz/2015/inquiry-hbl?utm_source=Subs&utm_medium=Subs&utm_campaign=HBL

ANZ INFLATION GAUGE: The ANZ Monthly Inflation Gauge posted a 0.1% increase in September. That’s a touch softer than the typical seasonal increase for this time of year. Go here for more:http://www.anz.co.nz/resources/9/e/9ea6aaa7-a2ef-44e1-ac30-c400bfbb2807/ANZ-MIG-20151012.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=9ea6aaa7-a2ef-44e1-ac30-c400bfbb2807

BEST DESIGN AWARD: Te Oro – a new, leading-edge music and arts facility in Glen Innes, Auckland has taken out a prestigious Purple Pin, the Best Design Award event’s supreme award for Interactive. More details about the awards can be found at http://www.bestawards.co.nz/

CLIMATE ACTION IN NZ: Sixteen of New Zealand’s most prestigious health professional organisations are today calling for New Zealand to take urgent action on climate change and health, a critical health issue. See the full text of the NZ ‘Call for Action’ on Climate Change and Health here: http://www.orataiao.org.nz 

EXERCISE TROPIC TWILIGHT: China has joined New Zealand, Britain and the USA in Pacific military disaster training for the first time, joining a 60-strong Exercise Tropic Twilight team of engineers working for six weeks on infrastructure projects in the Cook Islands. Read more: http://www.nzdf.mil.nz/news/media-releases/2015/20151008-nzdfltghoatci.htm

GUEST NIGHTS RISE: Latest data from Statistics New Zealand show that vational guest nights for August 2015 were 4.2 percent higher than in August 2014. More information available at:http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/industry_sectors/accommodation/AccommodationSurvey_HOTPAug15.aspxand http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/population/Migration/IntTravelAndMigration_HOTPAug15.aspx

HAYS REPORT: According to the latest Hays Quarterly Report of skills in demand, experienced professionals working in telesales, insurance, facilities management, data science, legal, marketing and trades are also in high demand and are not expected to see demand wane any time soon. To see the full list of skills in demand and trends please visithttp://www.hays.net.nz/report

LIBRARY CHALLENGE: The National Library of New Zealand’s GIF IT UP challenge is back. DigitalNZ and the Digital Public Library of America are calling for the best animated GIFs reusing historical material from libraries and archives from across the world. All information including prizes, rules, content pools and submission form can be found here: http://www.digitalnz.org/gif-it-up

LOCAL BUSINESS eBook: Business Kapiti Horowhenua, who organise and run the hugely successful Electra Kapiti Horowhenua Business Awards, have launched an e-book showcasing some of the outstanding local businesses to have featured in the Awards over the last six years. The (free) e-book is available to download from:https://sites.google.com/site/businesskapitihorowhenua/

NIUE ROLL OF HONOUR: Three Niuean soldiers who served in the First World War will now be included in the New Zealand Roll of Honour and Commonwealth War Graves Commission records. Further information about the Niuean contribution to the NZEF can be found at: http://ww100.govt.nz/niue-joins-the-new-zealand-war-effort 

NIUE LANGUAGE WEEK: The theme of this year’s Niue Language Week, which begins today, is “Tau tagata Niue, tau magafaoa Niue, fakaaoga e vagahau Niue – Niue people, Niue families, use vagahau Niue”. A list of events marking Niue Language Week can be found at: http://www.mpia.govt.nz/

PHARMACY CONSULTATION: Consultation on the plan outlining the future of pharmacy services in New Zealand gets underway today. A copy of the draft plan can be downloaded from the Ministry of Health website:http://www.health.govt.nz/publication/draft-pharmacy-action-plan-2015-2020

PROPERTY INVESTORS CONFERENCE: The NZ Property Investors Federation conference will be held from October 16 to 18 in Auckland. More details can be found at: http://www.buildingwealth.co.nz/bw/welcome

WESTPAC COMMENTARY: Westpac NZ Weekly Commentary says that the dairy sector’s sigh of relief has continued, with yet another sharp increase in the GlobalDairyTrade (GDT) auction price last week. Read more:https://wibiq.westpac.com.au/wibiqauthoring/_uploads/file/New_Zealand/2015/October_2015/12.10.2015_NZWC.pdf

And that’s our sampling of “news you can use” for Monday 12th October.

Brought to EveningReport by Newsroom Digest. –]]>

Zoo Celebrates Release Of 300th Kiwi

NewsroomPlus.com

Contributed by Auckland Zoo

A noisy little kiwi named Tīhoihoi (Maori for raucous) is today settling in to life on Rotoroa Island, becoming the 300th kiwi chick that Auckland Zoo has successfully incubated, hatched, reared and released to the wild.

A further 287 Northland brown kiwi chicks have been released since 1996. Some chicks have been released directly onto the mainland in the Whangarei Kiwi Sanctuary, but the majority have started life on kiwi crèche, Motuora Island. As adults, these birds have gone on to help re-establish kiwi populations in Whangarei Kiwi Sanctuary, Tawharanui, the Brynderwyns and Mataia predator-controlled areas.

“Conservation efforts are always about team work, and when 95% of kiwi chicks die before they reach breeding age in areas without predator control, team work is vital,” says Auckland Zoo field conservation manager, Ian Fraser.

Auckland Zoo has been involved in Operation Nest Egg since the technique was first developed by Department of Conservation (DOC) scientists, funded by the Kiwis for Kiwi (previously) BNZ Save the Kiwi Trust.

“It’s great that through the careful harvest and delivery of eggs by DOC staff and skilled volunteers, combined with the knowledge and dedication of the Zoo’s keepers, we can achieve a 94% success rate from fertile egg to release,” says Mr Fraser. “In protected areas, an Operation Nest Egg kiwi has a 65% chance of reaching adulthood, compared to a 5% survival for chicks toughing it out in unprotected wild areas.”

Mr Fraser says the more recent initiative between the Zoo, its partners Rotoroa Island Trust (RIT) and Thames Coast Kiwi Care (TCKC) to give Coromandel North Island brown kiwi a head start on Rotoroa, is strongly focused on advocacy for our national bird.

“While we’ll help contribute to growing the Coromandel kiwi population, having kiwi on Rotoroa is primarily about raising awareness about kiwi, demonstrating the value of intensive conservation management and inspiring future generations of New Zealanders to care about kiwi and get involved in helping them.”

More kiwi will be released onto Rotoroa over the coming months, and in March/April 2016, a kiwi muster will see a round-up of the kiwi that were first released on the island in late 2014/early 2015. These sub-adult birds will be returned to the 2,500ha protected area on the Thames Coast cared for by TCKC.

“As expected, these nocturnal birds aren’t showing themselves a lot, but we’re delighted that both Zoo and Rotoroa staff are seeing evidence that kiwi are doing well in the Rotoroa environment,” says RIT chairman Barrie Brown.

Kiwi Fast Facts

  • There are about 70,000 kiwi left in all of New Zealand, and we are losing 2% of our kiwi every year (27 kiwi each week). Key threats are introduced predators, primarily stoats, dogs, cats and ferrets, and loss of habitat.
  • North Island brown kiwi can live for 40-65 years. However, in Northland, where uncontrolled dogs remain a big killer of kiwi, the average life expectancy is just 14 years
  • Help kiwi! Always keep your dogs and cats in at night, don’t allow your dogs to be off-lead in areas where kiwi might live (bush, scrub and farmland) and have your dog undergo kiwi avoidance training. You can also find out about volunteer opportunities to help kiwi and about Save Kiwi Month (October) at: www.kiwisforkiwi.org.nz

About Rotoroa Island

  • The Rotoroa Island Trust (RIT) and Auckland Zoo formed a partnership in 2012 to create a wildlife reserve on Rotoroa, funded by the Hutton Wilson Charitable Trust ($4m over five years). Visit www.rotoroa.org
  • Following extensive planting, monitoring and pest eradication, seven wildlife species have now been introduced to the island – saddleback, whitehead, kiwi, moko and shore skinks,takahē, and pateke. The RIT-Auckland Zoo partnership plans to introduce up to 20 species to Rotoroa Island by 2018

–]]>

Farce of TPPA secrecy must end, Groser must stop misleading statements – Kelsey

]]>

Source: Professor Jane Kelsey & New Zealand Government.

‘The secrecy of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement has become farcical’, says University of Auckland Professor Jane Kelsey. ‘Trade Minister Tim Groser says we just have to trust what he’s telling us. In today’s interview with TVNZ’s The Nation he showed why we cannot.’

Minister Groser gave the tobacco exception to investor-state dispute settlement as an example of why Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement negotiations had to be kept secret. 

“… to give you an example – practical example – one of the things we’re very pleased about, and it only came together at the last minute, is this whole exception for tobacco control measures from this very controversial ISDS, this disputes settlement form. I can almost guarantee you that if we had made that public, we would not have got it. Big Tobacco in the United States has got hundreds of millions of dollars to campaign. If they had known what was at stake, for sure they would have gone in to senators and to congress offices. I don’t think Froman would have been allowed to do that.”

‘The claim is utter nonsense’, according to Professor Kelsey. 

The US’s limited exception to investor-state dispute settlement is a weak alternative to the comprehensive carveout for tobacco that Malaysia had proposed. The USTR had expected to table it earlier, but put off formally doing so until the last minute.

‘The decision to delay its formal presentation was highly political, but it had nothing to do with the US not showing its hand to the lobbyists as the Minister claims’, Professor Kelsey observed. ‘They already knew exactly what was going on.’ 

The following sample of reports show the US proposal has been known publicly for months and was the subject of intense discussions between the Obama administration and both the US tobacco industry and tobacco control groups:

·       Mitch McConnell Fights For Tobacco Interests In Trans-Pacific Trade Deal (8 September 2015) (http://www.forbes.com/sites/johnbrinkley/2015/09/08/with-friends-like-mitch-mcconnell/

·       Could Tobacco Carveout Kill TPP? (2 September 2015): [Reuters reported the administration had been considering allowing tobacco to be carved out of the investor-state dispute settlement, which, among other things, would give tobacco companies little protection against stiff regulation by trade partners, like Australia’s ban on branded cigarette packs.]

·       http://blogs.rollcall.com/wgdb/could-tobacco-carveout-kill-tpp/

·       Will Trans-Pacific trade deal go up in smoke over anti-tobacco proposal?, 12 August 2015, http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/will-trans-pacific-trade-deal-go-up-in-smoke-over-anti-tobacco-proposal-121272.html

·       USTR quietly pushing tobacco carve-out in TPP endgame (11 August 2015) http://foodandagpolicy.org/news/story/ustr-quietly-pushing-tobacco-carve-out-tpp-endgame-politico-pro

·       Tobacco Opponents, Advocates Fight For USTR’s Favor On TPP Carveout (6 August 2015) Inside US Trade.

‘Nor will the supposed “secrecy” protect the deal from political pressure. Pro-tobacco members of Congress have further opportunities to oppose the exception as the TPPA moves through the US political process, and are already threatening to do so’, according to Professor Kelsey.

‘Significantly  the rationale the Minister gave for keeping the details secret is to protect the deal from those who might want to influence the outcome, not the formal explanations he has given about the need to protect negotiating positions from premature disclosure to other parties’.

‘The Minister has been caught out on something we do have the evidence about. If he is spinning this example, we should expect he is spinning lots of other aspects of the deal that we can’t yet disprove. He should publish the text now or stop peddling his version until the text does become available.’

On October 7, the New Zealand Government stated the:  (ref. LiveNews.co.nz)

TPP is a very positive agreement for New Zealand. It further improves access to international markets, which supports our exporters to grow and create new jobs, and diversify their businesses overseas. TPP means:
  • 800 million potential customers for New Zealand goods and services.
  • NZ’s economy is estimated to benefit by at least $2.7 billion a year by 2030.
  • It will save $259 million a year in tariffs for New Zealand exporters.
  • It will support more jobs and higher incomes, and allow New Zealand exporters to sell more products and services to the world.
  • $28 billion of New Zealand goods and services were exported to TPP countries last year – that’s around 40 per cent of New Zealand’s overall exports.
  • Tariffs will be eliminated on 93 per cent of New Zealand’s exports to the United States, Japan, Canada, Mexico and Peru.
Not being in TPP would put the New Zealand economy and our businesses at a competitive disadvantage compared to other countries. TPP, like any free trade agreement, will go through New Zealand’s Parliamentary processes and is expected to come into force within two years.

]]>

Keith Rankin on Universal Basic Income versus Guaranteed Minimum Income

]]>

Analysis by Keith Rankin. This article was also published on TheDailyBlog.co.nz.

I was pleased to watch the half-hour interview with Bernie Sanders – United States Democratic presidential candidate – screened on Three60 on 4 October 2015. The final question asked was whether Sanders could support the introduction of a Universal Basic Income (UBI) in the United States. Sanders’ answer was a qualified ‘yes’, though I was not convinced that he fully appreciated what a UBI was and was not. Of most interest is that the UBI s on the global radar at present, as it never has been in the past.

Language Matters

While I do not claim to be the first person to ever use the term, it was my coining of the name Universal Basic Income in 1991 that led to the worldwide growth of the concept under that particular name. It was after I attended the Basic Income European Network (now ‘Basic Income Earth Network’) conference in Vienna in 1996 that this name permeated to a wider than New Zealand audience, in particular as a result of long-time Basic Income proponents Philippe van Parijs and Guy Standing – intellectual leaders within the BIEN movement – adopting the name subsequent to the Vienna conference.

My paper at that conference – Constructing a Social Wage and a Social Dividend from New Zealand’s tax-benefit system – did not include the name ‘Universal Basic Income’ in its title. But UBI was the central concept which I defined in that paper as: “A full universal basic income (UBI) is an adequate social dividend, equivalent to at least an unemployment benefit”. While my main concern in then was to promote the more general concept of ‘social dividend’ (or, in my more recent writing, ‘public equity dividend’), it is clear that the nuances around the name ‘universal basic income’ resonated with the international audience. One reason, I suggest, is that this name avoids the words ‘minimum’ and ‘guarantee’. Further, the word ‘universal’ has a wider reach than the word ‘unconditional’. “Unconditional’ sounds to too many ears like a freebie that others pay for, whereas ‘universal’ more easily blends with a ‘property rights’ approach.

(Other pre-existing names for a ‘basic income’ included ‘demogrant’ and ‘refundable tax credit’. But they were not sexy, and did not reflect any underlying principle. It was the word ‘universal’ that gave the concept its underlying warmth and dignity.)

In order to move forward with an idea that has potential to break through policy impasses around poverty and inequality, the idea should be based on ‘sharing’ principles (such as those of equity within an organisation) that are widely held across the political spectrum, and should not be built around principles of ‘taking’ or ‘transferring’. That’s not to suggest that all income transfers are bad or wrong; rather it’s that a widely acceptable way forward needs to adopt redistributive transfers on its periphery rather than at its core.

A Universal basic Income is not a Guaranteed Minimum Income.

In December 1987, New Zealand Finance Minister Roger Douglas announced a new income tax system based on a ‘low flat tax’ (intimated to be about 23 cents in the dollar) and a Guaranteed Minimum Income (GMI). While the new system was scuppered two months later by David Lange, the compromise worked out still looked much like what Douglas wanted (albeit a 2-step rather than a 1-step tax scale), and it included a pared-down GMI called a GMFI (Guaranteed Minimum Family Income). The GMFI still exists in New Zealand, under the name ‘Minimum Family Tax Credit’.

The GMI was a top-up transfer; it was the antithesis of a universal payment. Only poor workers would receive it. And it came with a 100% ‘effective marginal tax rate’; meaning that nobody receiving a GMI could gain an increase in after-tax income.

The GMI proposal sounds deceptively similar to the Universal Basic Income; indeed both essentially work in conjunction with a flat rate of income tax. The most obvious giveaway is that a GMI is a highly targeted transfer payment that allows for a low single-rate income tax (eg a rate under 30 percent), of the type Roger Douglas wanted and the Act Party still does. A UBI on the other hand comes with a flat rate of income tax in the 33-45 percent tax range (or, as in Gareth Morgan’s version, comes with another form of tax in addition to a flat-rate income tax).

With a UBI, taxes are simple, high by neoliberal standards, and everybody (subject only to age and residency criteria) claims an equal share of that public revenue as a basic income. While a UBI should never be understood as the only form of publicly-sourced cash income (some ‘needs-based’ transfers will always be necessary) – and is a dividend rather than a ‘hand-out’ – for a substantial majority of the resident adult population, it would be their only publicly-sourced income.

A UBI on its own is not a cure for poverty. Rather, it’s a public-property-rights-based payment that incidentally serves as a hand-up rather than as a handout. Of particular importance is the additional bargaining power it gives to the relatively poor. It tides-over people during spells without income – like ‘strike pay’ once did – enabling them to hold out for fair private-sector wages; and it reduces pressure on self-employed people who might otherwise under-tender to get work. Of equal importance is the way it addresses the low-income poverty trap that accompanies all forms of targeted redistribution. The GMI accentuates the low-income trap. The UBI eliminates it.

UBI and SBI

My initial 1991 publication was The Universal Welfare State incorporating proposals for a Universal Basic Income. The paper incorporated a ‘pension’ – conceived in terms of the Australian usage of the term to mean a non-work-tested benefit – which in later papers I called ‘supplementary basic income’ (SBI; refer The Collective Valuation of Unpaid and Underpaid Work) or simply ‘supplementary benefit’ (as in A New Fiscal Contract? Constructing a Universal Basic Income and a Social Wage, Social Policy Journal of New Zealand: 1997).

Any attempt to make a universal basic income the only kind of cash benefit payable falls down because it is either too expensive or too meagre. I addressed the issue through making a ‘pension’ available for particular groups of people (especially retirees, lone parents, and persons with long-term health conditions). This pension would be an alternative higher UBI set at an amount comparable with New Zealand Superannuation, but subject to a higher flat tax than the normal UBI. Retired people, for example, would opt for this option if they had little private income, whereas richer retired people would be better off sticking with the regular UBI that applies to all adults.

My general view today is that supplementary payments should reflect the full range of circumstances of those in special need (and this could include a provision for debt-aid that falls short of bankruptcy), and should be ‘tapered’ or ‘abated’ at a consistent rate. Once a person’s private means are sufficiently high, then their disposable incomes would be simply gross private earnings reduced by a flat-rate tax (eg 35 percent), plus their universal basic income. Increased productivity over time – more outputs produced relative to inputs required – would be the principal cue for an increase in both the rate of income tax and the amount of universal basic income.

What if a country has a UBI with a graduated tax scale?

Consider this example. If New Zealand had a UBI of $10,000 per year and a very simple graduated tax scale (0% on the first $10,000 of income and 40% on remaining income) then that would be the same as having an unemployed person’s UBI of $10,000 alongside an employed person’s UBI of $14,000. (The extra $4,000 is the automatic tax discount that only ‘taxpayers’ can receive.) It cannot be called a universal basic income if poorer people get as of right less publicly-sourced income than richer people.

In New Zealand at present, if you try to introduce a UBI of $10,000 while maintaining or extending progressive income taxation you would just create a super-UBI for the rich. All persons in New Zealand earning over $70,000 per year already receive a UBI (in all but name) of $9,080 per year.

Proportional taxation is at the core of the UBI concept. The central concept – horizontal equity – is well understood by most economists. The peripheral concept – vertical equity – is complementary (an affordable UBI must be accompanied by some needs-based income support). This is less well understood. Gareth Morgan, for example (in The Big Kahuna) sees vertical and horizontal equity as rival concepts.

Summary

It’s great that the concept of Universal Basic Income is being raised with people standing for the world’s highest office: President of the USA. We – the citizens of the world – have to be vigilant however that other similar-sounding proposals are not confused with a universal basic income. We need to be particularly vigilant with respect to names like ‘Guaranteed Minimum Income’.

A UBI is a truly universal distribution of a substantial portion of public revenue – an equal payment to poor and to rich. It is affordable if it coexists with needs-based welfare, rather than being set so high as to cover all conceivable needs. It is funded by a proportional tax system that reflects the importance of tangible and intangible property in the public domain as complementary to private property.

On its own a universal tax-benefit regime cannot end poverty. Rather it creates a power-balance; and a dynamic that confers dignity and puts an end to poverty traps. It enables people to say ‘no’ to exploitation, and ‘yes’ to private initiatives that contribute to social and economic wellbeing; to initiatives that, among other things, raise productivity and thereby raise the future level of universal basic income payable.

]]>

Final TPPA intellectual property chapter leaked, allows analysis to begin

]]>

Source: Professor Jane Kelsey.

“Inevitably, leaks are starting to fill the void of official texts from the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA),” says Professor Jane Kelsey, who has been pressing for the release of final texts to allow proper assessment of the government’s claims.

The final intellectual property chapter of 60 pages was posted on Wikileaks today,  accompanied by several technical analyses (https://wikileaks.org/tpp-ip3/). It will take time for the New Zealand implications to be fully assessed by intellectual property specialists, although some have already criticised the impact of extending copyright to life plus 70 years, which is in two steps.  

Two points stand out as showing the success of public pressure brought to bear on these negotiations.

“We can now see the compromise wording on new generation biologics won by the Australians, on which New Zealand will rely,” Kelsey said. “Under QQ.E.20 Big Pharma’s monopoly is either at least 8 years, or ‘effective market protection’ for at least five years, through other measures, and recognising the contribution of market circumstances to effective market protection, ‘to deliver a comparable outcome in the market.”

There is no guarantee that this exception will survive the backlash already evident within the US Congress, and US moves to rewrite the intention of the vague text by refusing to certify New Zealand’s compliance until we adopt an equivalent of 8 years protection.

While the 8 year threshold is a victory for the international campaign against the orignal proposal of 12 years, health specialists warn the real gain for Big Pharma is to bring biologics within the agreement. It will then build on that precedent.  Worryingly, there is an inbuilt review of the biologics provision in 10 years. Biologics is also very broadly defined in a way taht will catch most biologic medicines, when countries were seeking the right to decide their own definition.

Second, Professor Kelsey notes ‘the New Zealand government has scrambled to cover its back in the Waitangi Tribunal claim with an Annex that wasn’t in previous leaked drafts. That gives New Zealand some flexibility in meeting the US demand that we adopt the UPOV 1991 convention on plant variety rights.’ (see http://www.citizen.org/documents/UPOVandNZ.pdf)  

The Crown insisted in the Waitangi Tribunal hearing that the Treaty of Waitangi exception used since 2001 would effectively protect Maori rights under the TPPA. Professor Kelsey notes that the new Annex  implicitly admits it does not.

“The Annex is an improvement, but still problematic, as will be argued before the Waitangi Tribunal when it reconvenes to consider the TPPA claim. It also doesn’t address potentially similar problems in the requirement that New Zealand adopts the Budapest Treaty on Microrganisms, to which we are also not a party,” Jane Kelsey said.

]]>

Scientists find formula for rate of glacial erosion

NewsroomPlus.com

Contributed by GNS Science

It’s a truism that mathematical relationships are present nearly everywhere in nature, probably more than we realise. The latest place they have turned up is on the underside of glaciers.

Franz Josef Glacier

A group of international scientists working on Franz Josef Glacier (Kā Roimata o Hine Hukatere) in the South Island has found that the rate of glacial erosion is proportional to the square of the glacier’s speed. They describe this as non-linear behaviour.

In other words, fast moving glaciers, or portions of glaciers, erode much more rock than slow moving glaciers. The finding confirms a theoretical model that was first proposed in the 1970s.

It means that as the Earth gets warmer and glaciers accelerate, the rate of glacial erosion will increase. A result will be more rapid carving of our landscape by glaciers with a corresponding increase in levels of sediment and mud carried in alpine streams and rivers.

The finding applies to faster-moving glaciers in mountainous mid-latitude regions, but may not apply to polar glaciers that move more slowly.

The research is the cover story in this week’s issue of the prestigious journal Science, and involved a collaboration of scientists from Switzerland, France, the United States, and New Zealand.

Co-author on the paper, geologist Simon Cox of GNS Science, said non-linear behaviour explained the wide range of observed glacial erosion rates and also the profound impact of glaciation on mountainous landscapes during the past few millions years.

Dr Simon Cox, GNS Science

“The erosive power of glaciers varies considerably, with some of the most rapid glacial erosion happening in mid-latitude climates,” Dr Cox said.

“This research confirms that fast glaciers are more effective at gouging landscapes than slow-moving ones.”

Although the process of glaciation is widespread in the landscape, scientists don’t fully understand it, partly because of the great difficulty accessing the ice-bedrock interface underneath glaciers.

In the study of the Franz Josef Glacier, which took place over a five-month period in 2013 and 2014, the scientists used a combination of two techniques to shed light on the glacier’s behaviour.

First they used satellite imagery to measure the speed of the glacier at its surface, which reaches up to 3m-a-day. At the same time, they analysed the crystalline structure of carbon-bearing particles – mostly graphite
– collected from the meltwater river below the glacier.

To do this they used a method called Raman spectroscopy, which involves measuring the way light is scattered when it interacts with carbonaceous particles. They then used the ‘Raman signature’ to track particles back to the bands of Alpine Schist rocks from where each particle was eroded.

This enabled them to quantify erosion rates beneath the glacier. From the results, they have developed a law forglacial erosion that captures the variability seen globally, in different climate zones.

Their work shows erosion is highly sensitive to small variations in topographic slope and rainfall.

Dr Cox said the power demonstrated by the combination of techniques will enable scientists to better understand glacial erosion and how this will change as glaciers respond to global warming.

–]]>

Otago researchers sequence kuri dog genomes

NewsroomPlus.com

Contributed by University of Otago

The genetic heritage of New Zealand’s first dog, the now extinct kurī, is being unravelled by University of Otago scientists using state-of-the-art ancient DNA analysis.

640

University of Otago PhD student Karen Greig has sequenced the complete, or near complete, mitochondrial genomes of 14 kurī represented by bones recovered from Wairau Bar, one on New Zealand’s earliest and most important archaeological sites.

The findings are newly published in the prestigious international journal PLOS ONE and are part of Ms Greig’s PhD research into dog/human relationships in the ancient Pacific world, which is being supervised by Professor Lisa Matisoo-Smith (Anatomy) and Professor Richard Walter (Anthropology and Archaeology).

The 14 mitogenomes, which trace the dogs’ maternal line of descent, were sequenced from ancient DNA samples extracted from teeth excavated from an oven feature at Marlborough’s Wairau Bar site by the archaeology team led by Professor Walter. This oven was used sometime between the early 1320s and 1350 AD. Wairau Bar is the site of New Zealand’s first major Polynesian settlement.

Kurī were smallish dogs about the size of cocker spaniels and were brought to New Zealand from East Polynesia in the colonising canoes that arrived in the early fourteenth century AD. They were the only domesticated animal to be successfully introduced by the Polynesian settlers but died out as a distinct breed after interbreeding with European dogs.

The research team was able to identify five distinct maternal lineages, known as haplotypes, in the 14 dogs.

“This represents quite limited genetic diversity, which either suggests that the founding kurī population may have only been a few dogs or that the arriving dogs were closely related,” Ms Greig says.

In the latter instance, the ancestors of these dogs would have likely passed through a series of genetic bottlenecks at times during their movement across the Pacific, she says.

The researchers also discovered that the Wairau Bar dogs are genetically most similar to modern dogs from Indonesia.

Professor Matisoo-Smith says that advances in DNA sequencing technology that enabled the Wairau Bar kurī study can be used in other research to provide deeper insights into ancient origins of Pacific peoples and animals and their migration routes across Oceania.

“One of the most exciting results was the discovery that by using these latest technologies Karen was able to sequence the entire mitochondrial genome as opposed to only a small portion, as done in previous ancient DNA studies of Pacific dogs. This revealed levels of genetic variation which may allow us to ultimately track down the origin of the New Zealand kurī and its relationship to other dogs found across the Pacific and through Island and Mainland Southeast Asia,” says Professor Matisoo-Smith.

This research is the most recent output from the Wairau Bar Research Group, a collaboration between Otago researchers and Rangitane-ki-Wairau and the Canterbury Museum. The Otago research team is led by archaeologist Professor Richard Walter (Department of Anthropology and Archaeology), and biological anthropologists Associate Professor Hallie Buckley and Professor Lisa Matisoo-Smith (Department of Anatomy).

–]]>

Editorial: Jon Stephenson’s Eyes Wide Shut Revelations Require Official Investigative Scrutiny

]]>

Editorial by Selwyn Manning.

Selwyn Manning, editor – EveningReport.nz

EYES WIDE SHUT: Last week news broke about a defamation settlement in the case of journalist Jon Stephenson V New Zealand Defence Force.

But now, after a week has passed with statements issued by both Jon Stephenson and NZDF we are none the wiser why the Government reacted so aggressively to shut down the claims in Stephenson’s Metro investigation Eyes Wide Shut back in 2011.

Yesterday (October 8, 2015), I spoke about this issue on Radio New Zealand’s The Panel with Jim Mora and Lisa Scott. You can listen to this by clicking here

When Jon Stephenson’s Eyes Wide Shut investigation was published by Metro editor Simon Wilson, the Defence Force and the Prime Minister attacked the journalist’s credibility. They challenged several aspects of the article, including direct quotations and references citing an Afghan commander in Kabul. The Defence Force and the Prime Minister caused doubt over whether Jon Stephenson had indeed interviewed this person for the investigative article.

Now, after a costly court battle, the Defence Force has accepted that Stephenson did in fact gain entry to the base and had interviewed the CRU commander. It has settled with Jon Stephenson after spending more than $600,000.00 on court and legal costs.

The Prime Minister however will not be drawn on this issue. Back in 2011, he said: “I’ve got no reason for the NZDF to be lying, and I’ve found [Mr Stephenson] myself personally not to be credible.”

Now that Jon Stephenson’s credibility has been restored, we are left with a long list of unanswered questions – questions that relate to whether New Zealand’s SAS soldiers were in fact ordered to hand over Afghan citizens to US personnel knowing that they would likely be tortured.

At this juncture, we do not know what became of these people. Are they still alive? Have they been repatriated to their homeland? What were their ages and gender? Were they innocent? Were they tortured?

Does the New Zealand Government accept that New Zealand’s SAS soldiers did in fact hand over people to those known to use torture?

If so, who issued that order?

Why did the Government initiate a shoot-the-messenger stance?

The allegations within Eyes Wide Shut and other investigative articles by Jon Stephenson remain hanging in time. If they are true they suggest New Zealand was party to a war crime, party to a breach of the Geneva Convention.

New Zealanders deserve an official investigation, without political interference, into this disturbing issue. Both Labour and National ought to do the right thing and agree to initiate an independent inquiry.

New Zealand Report: Maori Concerned Over TPPA Permiting Open Buy-Up of NZ Land

New Zealand Report: Selwyn Manning delivers NZ Report to Australia’s radio FiveAA.com.au. This week: Maori Concerned Over TPPA permitting foreign buy-up of prime New Zealand land + Sheep Milk boon industry looms – Recorded live on 9/10/15.

ITEM ONE

Maori Concerned Over TPPA Permitting Buy-Up of Land (ref. http://foreignaffairs.co.nz/2015/10/08/tpp-may-affect-maori-land-interests/ )

Senior Labour Party MP and close relative to the Maori King, Nanaia Mahuta, is calling on Maori Party MPs to front up and explain why the Government’s Trans Pacific Partnership negotiators have failed to restrict foreign buyers of New Zealand land.

The Maori Party is part of the National led Government coalition, and, Nanaia Mahuta is largely supported by one of New Zealand’s largest, wealthiest, and strongest tribes, the Tainui Iwi.

Maori are divided over the TPPA, especially since details began to emerge this week revealing how New Zealand’s TPPA negotiators had agreed to permit foreign buyers – or those originating from Trans Pacific Partnership countries – the right to purchase land or housing blocks of up to $200 million each… before having to seek the approval of the Overseas Investment Office.

On Thursday Nanaia Mahuta said Australia’s TPPA negotiators managed to secure Australia’s right to restrict foreign buyers of Australian homes.

Likewise, Malaysian negotiators secured an agreement that permits Malaysia to ban foreign ownership of affordable housing.

Compare this to New Zealand. Before the TPP negotiations, any foreign purchases of housing or land blocks, valued at $100 million, first required the consent of the Overseas Investment Office and the approval of a minister of the Crown.

The Government’s negotiators caved in on that point, and have allowed that cap to rise to $200 million.

Maori groups have already taken the Government to court over the TPPA. It is facing a legal challenge in the Maori rights court, the Waitangi Tribunal. It appears more litigation is coming.

Yesterday, Mahuta said, the Government has negotiated away our rights to protect our land.

For its part, the National -led Government has stated it has got the best TPP deal possible. Prime Minister John Key said: “As a country, we won’t get rich selling things to ourselves. Instead, we need to sell more of our products and services to customers around the world, and TPP helps makes that happen.”

ITEM TWO:

Sheep to the Rescue (ref. http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/farming/sheep/72382854/investment-could-turn-sheep-milking-into-nzs-next-billion-dollar-industry )

And while the Government failed to negotiate a good deal for Kiwi dairy farmers, some of New Zealand’s state-owned farms have found solace in the knowledge… that if you look after that special relationship between Kiwis and Sheep, then, great rewards will flow.

This story shows there’s more to sheep than just wool and mutton.

The state owned Spring Sheep farm near Taupo has started milking its 3500 sheep. Apparently, sheep milk could be, according to the Government’s Landcorp spokesperson Nick Gowland, a billion dollar industry in ten years.

So the dairy cow’s loss is the milking ewe’s bonus. There’s happy days ahead.

And that news has certainly got the government and some farmers rubbing their hands together.

]]>

NewsRoom Digest: Top NZ News Items for October 08, 2015

]]>

Newsroom Digest

This edition of NewsRoom_Digest features 7 resourceful links of the day and the politics pulse from Thursday 8th October.

NEWSROOM_MONITOR

Top stories in the current news cycle include the Ngapuhi runanga defending loans it has made to Tuhoronuku, the group negotiating the iwi’s treaty settlement, Prime Minister John Key’s flying visit to the 105 New Zealand troops at Taji Military Camp in Iraq and plans by Solid Energy to close its underground Huntly East coal mine.

Note: As well as providing a precis of leading broadcast bulletins each day, our NewsRoom_Monitor service does a daily paper round with succinct ‘news picks’ from the main metropolitan papers emailed by 9am each morning. If you’re interested in a free trial please email monitor@newsroom.co.nz

POLITICS PULSE

Media releases issued from Parliament by political parties today included:

Government: Minister welcomes Health Star Ratings on drinks: Funding for Otago forests, birds and wetlands; Ambassador for Counter Terrorism Announced; New road safety billboards for West Coast; Report shows major potential for Waimea dam;40 more youth forensic mental health workers;Make a pre-Christmas date with StudyLink

Greens: Govt needs a plan to support people working in coal industry

Labour: Parata puts brakes on charter school appraisal; Mine closure a blow to Huntly

New Zealand First: Māori Women’s Welfare League deserves Government engagement; Thoughtless Carriage Giveaway Robs Rail Development; Stinging Pentagon Assessment Casts ; Suicide action plan failing farmers; Shadow Over Pm Visit; Very Slow Broadband Limits Rural Users; Suicide action plan failing farmers; Speech-Adult Illiteracy Costs Us, Just As Greater Adult Literacy Enriches Us

NZ National Party:Paying the price for mishandling Solid Energy

United Future Party: Dunne Speaks- Trade is part of our economic DNA

LINKS OF THE DAY

Links of the day have been a feature of NewsRoom_Digest since we first started production in August 2014 at newsroom-nz.tumblr.com. We are currently building an archive of these at:http://newsroomplus.com/resources/resourceful-links/

AUCKLAND’S ENVIRONMENT REPORT: ‘The Health of Auckland’s Natural Environment In 2015’ report delivered by Auckland Council’s Research and Evaluation Unit (RIMU) presents a snapshot of the current and potential environmental issues, recent changes, and long term trends.The full report is available here:http://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/EN/planspoliciesprojects/reports/Pages/stateofaucklandreportcardshome.aspx?utm_source=shorturl&utm_medium=print&utm_campaign=State_of_Auckland

CAWTHRON INSTITUTE CONTRIBUTION: A report launched today shows the Cawthron’s 200 staff bring in earnings of $1 million a month to the economy and turnover has grown $5 million in the last three years, with about half of its revenue coming from government. The report can be viewed at:http://www.cawthron.org.nz/publication/corporate-documents/impact-cawthron-institute-economic-contribution-nelson-and-new-zealand/

CONSUMER PRICE INDEX: Westpac estimates that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose by just 0.1% in the September quarter, bringing annual inflation down to a new cycle low of 0.2%. Go here for more:https://wibiq.westpac.com.au/wibiqauthoring/_uploads/file/New_Zealand/2015/October_2015/Q3_CPI_Preview_October_2015.pdf

DRINKS RATINGS: The New Zealand Beverage Council (NZBC) is to adopt the Health Star Ratings (HSR) on nearly all non-alcoholic beverages. Further information about the HSR can be found on the Food Smart website:http://www.foodsmart.govt.nz/whats-in-our-food/food-labelling/front-pack-labelling/

GETTING HELP FROM FAMILY: A whopping 97 percent of New Zealanders can turn to family for help and support, according to new research from Statistics New Zealand. The reports are available at :http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/people_and_communities/Well-being/social-connectedness/social-networks/supportive-family.aspx and http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/people_and_communities/Well-being/social-connectedness/social-networks/supportive-friends.aspx

NZDF REVIEW: A Ministry of Defence review of the New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) has highlighted positive initial training for recruits. The full report is available here: http://defence.govt.nz/reports-publications/evaluation-report-recruit-training/contents.html

NZ HEALTH PROFESSIONALS CALLED UPON: Today the World Health Organization is calling for health professionals around the world to push for a strong effective climate agreement at the UN Climate Conference in Paris this December. In the WHO’s words, “Health professionals have a duty of care to current and future generations”. More details on the WHO’s call can be found at its webpage dedicated to its global change campaign at:http://www.who.int/globalchange/global-campaign/en/

And that’s our sampling of “news you can use” for Thursday 8th October.

Brought to EveningReport by Newsroom Digest. –]]>

Jane Kelsey: Renewed Official Information Act requests for TPPA cost benefit and impact analyses

Source: Professor Jane Kelsey.

[caption id="attachment_6181" align="alignleft" width="150"]Professor Jane Kelsey. Professor Jane Kelsey.[/caption]

Auckland University law professor Jane Kelsey has made an urgent request to Trade Minister Tim Groser under the Official Information Act for the study on which he bases  projected gains to New Zealand’s GDP by 2030, asking that it be released no later than Monday 12 October.

The request notes that ‘Given that the negotiations have concluded New Zealand’s position could not conceivably be jeopardised by its release; it is not information belonging to any other country in the TPPA negotiations; and the government is currently citing these figures in the current debate on the TPPA but not has not publishing the study on which it is based.’

The Minister’s office has acknowledged the request. 

She has also repeated an earlier Official Information request made in January 2015 for ‘any cost-benefit study, impact asessment or similar analysis or evaluation of the proposed agreement as a whole, of specific provisions, or impacts on particular sectors or policies that have been conducted by or for the New Zealand government.’

In February the Minister refused to release any such information. It later transpired that this includes an NZIER study on the Labour Market Effects of TPP. The Ministry said its  release during the negotiations would prejudice New Zealand’s ability to get the best outcome, a rationale which Professor Kelsey notes no longer applies.

This request was part of a broader request for eight categories of information, which the Minister refused on a blanket basis. The Minister’s decision is currently subject to judicial review in the High Court.

However, the Chief Ombudsman’s review of the Minister’s decision was a pre-requisite to that judicial review, and she did not form a final opinion about this particular category of information. It was therefore not able to include it in the judicial review proceedings.

In her report, the Chief Ombudsman said her investigation of this matter would be ongoing. That was on 27 July. Despite numerous requests, there has been no indication that it has been actively pursued in the ten weeks since then.  In light of the conclusion of the negotiations, and the lack of information publicly available, Professor Kelsey has asked the Chief Ombudsman to provide a conclusive response on that category of information by Monday 12 October.

]]>

Keith Rankin: Predicting the World Economy through Financial Balances

]]>

Analysis by Keith Rankin. This article was also published on Scoop.co.nz. 

In my most recent Charts for this Week on Evening Report, I have published charts of average private sector and government financial balances (surpluses/deficits) for a wide range of countries for two decades of financial excess (Spread of Financial Balances by Country, 1995-2014), and of shifts of selected countries from before to after the global financial crisis (Shifts of Country Financial Balances before and after the Global Financial Crisis).

While these long-term averages represent the ‘financial personalities’ of these countries, the chart of shifts shows important changes that have resulted from the 2008-09 world crisis.

[caption id="attachment_7479" align="aligncenter" width="640"]Spread of Financial Balances by Country, 1995-2014. Spread of Financial Balances by Country, 1995-2014.[/caption]

Country ‘Financial Personalities’

In a highly stable world economy, all balances would be close to zero, on both the private (horizontal) and public (vertical) axes. (If the world economy is growing, then countries should be spread in Quadrant 2 along the line of current account balance, from the 0,0 position to the +4,-4 position. If countries grow at 4% per year, then government annual deficits at 4% of GDP are quite stable.)

The fact that financial personalities show such diversity suggests that the world economy (probably since the 1980s) has a repeated tendency to become financially unbalanced, with crises (‘hard-landing’ corrections) likely to occur five or more times in a person’s lifetime. Soft-landing corrections (controlled ‘deleverage’) can occur if most (preferably all) countries can recognise the danger signs and choose to adopt rebalancing financial behaviours to pre-empt these crises.

Looking at the Spread of Financial Balances by Country, 1995-2014, the most unstable positions are marked by the gold ‘money mountain’ (that represents making and hoarding lots of money, what many people believe constitutes economic success) and the red ‘debt mountain’. For systemic reasons – the zero-sum requirement that at all times as many countries are on the left of the ‘line of current account balance’ as are on the right – when some countries manage to cluster around the money mountain then other countries must be clustered around the debt mountain. The process of repayment of debts by those in the red quadrant to their creditors in the gold quadrant, would mean a switching of position during this deleveraging phase. (A country repaying debts is running financial surpluses, whereas a country being repaid is running deficits.) The problem is that it requires all countries to place themselves outside their financial comfort zones; like requiring a reversal of yang and yin every decade or so.

Evaluating Intent

One key dynamic of intent this decade is governments seeking to raise their financial balances. This is a process known as ‘government austerity’ or ‘fiscal consolidation’. On the chart we can visualise this as governments – through their fiscal policies – seeking to move up the chart. They can only actually achieve this ‘upwards intent’ if other countries accommodate by moving down or moving left.

Most neoclassical economists assume (though usually without supporting evidence) that upwards movements by governments will induce leftward movements of their private sectors. However the global financial crisis itself brought about a sharp rightward movement in the world’s private sectors (increased thrift, debt repayment; decrease in new private sector debts incurred). Further, fiscal consolidation tends to aggravate private-sector caution. Business confidence increases when governments are good customers, and decreases when governments as customers are stingy or unreliable.

In essence any intent anywhere to move one’s own private balances to the right (or one’s government’s balances upward) has a depressive effect on the economy, raising unemployment if enough other people or businesses share that intent. Conversely, any intent on the part of private parties to decrease their financial balances (ie spend and borrow more, move leftward on the chart) has a stimulatory effect on the global economy, as does any attempt by governments to decrease their financial balances (ie to increase their fiscal deficits), downward movement on the chart.

[caption id="attachment_7595" align="aligncenter" width="640"]Shifts of Country Financial Balances before and after the Global Financial Crisis. Shifts of Country Financial Balances before and after the Global Financial Crisis.[/caption]

The world pattern for this decade is revealed in part by the second chart (Shifts of Country Financial Balances before and after the Global Financial Crisis). We know that the general intent on the part of governments this decade has been to raise their balances (move up the chart). We see that only Germany has achieved that intent. The bigger story has been the private intent to move right, offset by induced (largely unintended) increases in government deficits; ie by government balances that have decreased despite policy intent to raise those balances. The secondary story is that of three of the four BRIC economies (Brazil, India, China) whose private balances have shifted to the left, counter to the global movement post-crisis. It is these countries’ willingness to borrow or spend that ‘saved’ the world capitalist economy in the last half decade. Brazil and China are now experiencing the ‘economic wobbles’ – as are Russia and Canada, two other important accommodators. These countries are now unable to continue offsetting the rest of the world’s miserliness.

A Soft landing?

It is approaching time to action the soft-landing strategy to stabilise the global economy. I don’t see it happening. The way the Eurozone is structured at present means that Germany can hardly discontinue its ‘gold mountain’ quest (see my Germany, the Eurozone and Mercantilism, 29 Sep 2015). The chance that Germans are suddenly going to switch into a spendthrift strategy – which is what the world needs of it – is close to zero. Increased American spending has become the main stabilising factor in the world in 2015, but that is likely to fall away sharply in 2017, with whatever new administration takes over then.

The most likely future for the world economy in the final third of this decade is another hard-landing, with lots of private debt write-offs, another big private sector spending freeze (shift to the right), and ever bigger government deficits required to contain the damage.

Japan got into this financial dynamic first, in the 1990s. Whither the global economy? Watch Japan. The good news is that Japan’s economic situation is not nearly as bad as most western economists and financiers think it ought to be. Government-facilitated spending in Japan is the solution, not the problem.

]]>

NZDF-Led task group hands over tropic twilight aid to Cook Islands

NewsroomPlus.com

Contributed by New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF)

A multinational task group led by the New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) today handed over a new fuel depot built as part of Exercise Tropic Twilight to Cook Islands officials.

Exercise Tropic Twilight 15

Several schools and hospitals that were repaired by a team comprising of military engineers and skilled tradesmen from China, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States were also handed over at an official ceremony in the northern Cook Islands atoll of Penrhyn.

“The past six weeks have been an invaluable opportunity to work alongside and learn from our international peers,” said Captain Andrew Blackburn, Senior National Officer for the New Zealand contingent.

“Tropic Twilight also offered an opportunity to practise the NZDF’s capability to deploy alongside other militaries to provide Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR),” he added.

Major General Tim Gall, Commander Joint Forces New Zealand, said the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) participation in Tropic Twilight for the first time resulted from a decision by China and New Zealand to increase professional cooperation especially in the area of HADR.

“It was agreed that participation by PLA engineers in Tropic Twilight would be a logical next step in developing the relationship,” Major General Gall said.

Exercise Tropic Twilight is a recurring activity conducted this year in the northern Cook Islands’ atoll of Penrhyn and Manihiki from 31 August – 12 October. It is held in partnership with the government of the Cook Islands and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, which funded the new fuel depot and the other infrastructure improvements being delivered as part of the exercise. The FAPF (Forces Armees en Polynesie francaise) are also supporting the humanitarian activity.

Nick Hurley, New Zealand’s High Commissioner to the Cook Islands said relocating and upgrading the Penrhyn fuel depot has helped avert a potential oil spill.

The new fuel depot in Penrhyn

“The new fuel depot will refuel the Australian-funded Cook Islands Pacific Patrol Boat Te Kukupa, which conducts long-range maritime patrols against illegal fishing in the northern Cooks,” he said.

Around 40 engineers, plumbers, carpenters, and electricians from the NZDF’s 2nd Engineer Regiment worked alongside 20 military engineers from the PLA, the Royal Regiment, and the US Army Pacific to build the new fuel depot. Schools and hospitals were refurbished to address potential electrical hazards to ensure they can better withstand the cyclones that regularly affect the Pacific Islands.

The handover ceremony was attended by Cook Islands officials led by Deputy Prime Minister Teariki Heather, Brigadier General Stephen Curda of the US Army’s 9th Mission Support Command, and Brigadier Antony Hayward from the NZDF.

 

–]]>

Nigel Sharplin one of NZ’s fastest rising cutting edge new world hi-tech designers

NewsroomPlus.com

Contributed by inFact

He is passionate about his work but can be hard to track down because he is always on the move, one step ahead, looking for new innovation opportunities he can design and development to help New Zealand grow.

He has produced Navman accessories, world-first wheelchair remotes, parking meter systems,  world first chip-card devices, a range of tools to find out which pine trees are best for building construction and  was a key figure in Fisher & Paykel’s mechanical design team on the hugely successful Smart Drive washing machine.

Sharplin’s Christchurch company inFact is a finalist in three categories at the New Zealand Innovators Awards to be held at the Cloud in Auckland next week (October 15).

Nigel Sharplin photographed by Eve Welch in the InFact office.Sharplin was born at Leeston in South Canterbury, grew up in Richmond, Nelson, and attended Waimea College. His father was his mentor and motivation for him to receive his Mechanical Engineering degree with honours at the University of Canterbury.

“My father is a very clever engineer who taught me how to solve problems by thinking.  I always wanted to be a design engineer and run my own business developing innovative products. Engineering has given me the freedom to express my creativity to make real change in the world for good” Sharplin says.

“After university I loved being a part of the game changing team at Fisher & Paykel which taught me the philosophy and values that drive inFact’s methodology and approach.  Fisher & Paykel set out to change the world of appliances by innovating every aspect of the washing machine except that it washes using water.  Samsung copied it, everybody but Jack Welsh himself from GE visited Fisher & Paykel during the development when they were doing a licensing deal and the technology has become very much the state of the art globally

“After I set up inFact I was invited by GPC Electronics to a meeting in Wellington with Industrial Research Limited and the Carter Holt Harvey (CHH) subsidiary Fibre-gen to help productionise the Hitman HM200 timber testing product.  We did that and it was a great. Fibre-gen then asked us to develop the Hitman ST300 tool which was a complex and expensive development.  We ended up taking a 20 percent stake in the business when they asked if we would complete the development at our cost in exchange for shares.  When Graham Hart bought CHH, management sold Fibre-gen to inFact and director Peter Carter.

“To date my best achievement has been the formation and growth of the inFact design business.  This type of professional practice is essential to the future value of the New Zealand economy.  With a thinking approach to the creation of game-changing innovative new products customers want to buy we can build a strong first world economy here.

“As British inventor and Dyson company founder James Dyson said when he was in New Zealand advising our government: ‘without a high tech manufacturing sector New Zealand cannot create enough wealth to sustain growth and maintain parity with other nations’.  The German manufacturing sector earned $US5000 per capita in 2014 while New Zealand earned $165 her head so we have a long way to go.

“We are currently working on several large product and system development initiatives that will help New Zealand grow faster.  With ZIP Zero Invasive Predators Ltd which is a charity set up by the Department of Conservation, Next and Sam and Gareth Morgan to eradicate rats, stoats and possums, our company inFact has been contracted to; develop new innovative systems for luring these predators to their traps and to support volume production of these for roll out across New Zealand’s native and exotic forests and hinterlands.”

InFact’s designs have been translated into 100’s of millions of dollars of export product for New Zealand.  InFact have delivered internationally successful game-changing products for companies such as Carter Holt Harvey, Navman, Dynamic Controls, Integrated Technology Solutions and Provenco.

Sharplin and fellow director Peter Carter have secured 27 patent registrations for the use of acoustics in the grading of green wood involving their Hitman HM200, ST300 hand tools that have become the gold standard internationally for forest wood assessment.  Hitman PH330 product is Sharplin and Carters latest invention which measures trees automatically while being harvested and sends them to the right mill for processing.  This invention alone will create and estimated $200 million of new value for the forestry sector in New Zealand according to Scion.

Nigel Sharplin 1

The world is waking up to the benefits and opportunity of construction of high rise buildings using engineered wood products such as laminated veneer lumber and cross laminated timber panels which are both manufactured in New Zealand.

“A seven storey timber structure survived the equivalent of nine Kobe earthquakes on a Japanese earthquake simulator platform with no discernible damage.  Wood is the ultimate resilient and renewable resource for construction,” Sharplin says.

The Hitman range of products is how the forest owners segregate the timber for these wood processors.  We must however make decisions at the point of harvest based on the value of the timber and not just the commodity based volume of it.

“Wood processing and manufacturing is New Zealand’s third largest export sector at $2.5 billion a year and if log exports are added it’s almost on a par with second-placed meat exports.  In the central North Island we’ve lost 100,000 hectares of forest land in the last few years to dairy farming.

“This is simply driven by economics as high export log prices drive replanting regimes.  By extracting the highest value wood from our forests and processing this in New Zealand for value added export products we can ensure a strong forest industry.

“Scandinavia has proven countries can sustainably fuel an entire first world economy using wood products.  They just put their minds to the task as nations and made the decision to create a zero emissions economy.  We can do this in New Zealand if we are prepared to make a commitment to achieving this and not be influenced by the traditional concrete, steel and fossil fuel corporations.

“There is a massive 50 percent increase in the volume of plantation wood coming online in 2020.  We need to get organised now to ensure that at the time we harvest this wood we can turn it into high value logs and wood products and not simply sell it to the commodity log market.  We can lift the value of the forest wood sector from $5billion at our current volume and processing regime to $12billion with the increased volumes and if we take on this challenge of enhancing the value of the harvest,” Sharplin says.

–]]>

NewsRoom Digest: Top NZ News Items for October 07, 2015

]]>

Newsroom Digest

This edition of NewsRoom_Digest features 13 resourceful links of the day and the politics pulse from Wednesday 7th October.

NEWSROOM_MONITOR

Top stories in the current news cycle includes a survey of early childhood teachers raising concerns about under-staffing at childcare centres, ongoing ripples of response to the newly signed TPP deal and the launching of E tū Union, the largest private sector union in the country.

Note: As well as providing a precis of leading broadcast bulletins each day, our NewsRoom_Monitor service does a daily paper round with succinct ‘news picks’ from the main metropolitan papers emailed by 9am each morning. If you’re interested in a free trial please email monitor@newsroom.co.nz

POLITICS PULSE

Media releases issued from Parliament by political parties today included:

Government: New Ambassador to Thailand named; New Ambassador to Timor-Leste announced; Dr Nick Smith – Speech at the Our Oceans Conference; Terms of reference for Creative Sector Study released; 30 per cent drop in crime since 2008; Work starts on new maximum-security facility; New Customs officers on frontline for summer;Simon Bridges to attend APEC ministerial meetings; Minister to focus on future of non-casino gambling; Prime Minister visits NZ troops in Camp Taji, Iraq

Greens:Greens Support E tū Union Launch; Charter schools evaluation reveals next to nothing; KiwiSaver withdrawals highlight growing hardship

Labour:National lengthens the digital lag; New Zealand gave away right to protect houses and land in TPP; Farmers aren’t stupid

New Zealand First: TPPA raising investor threshold proves deal is about corporate influence not trade; Crown setting worrying trend for treaty obligations

LINKS OF THE DAY

Links of the day have been a feature of NewsRoom_Digest since we first started production in August 2014 at newsroom-nz.tumblr.com. We are currently building an archive of these at:http://newsroomplus.com/resources/resourceful-links/

ACC REPORT: ACC’s annual report, released today, shows a net surplus of $1.6 billion – $743 million ahead of budget – largely due to stronger investment earnings in international markets. The annual report is available atwww.acc.co.nz/2015ANNUALREPORT

CHARTER SCHOOL REPORT: Innovations in Partnership Schools Kura Hourua report by consultancy Martin Jenkins on behalf of the Ministry of Education, found early evidence the schools are developing innovative solutions for their communities, with schools enjoying the flexibility of the funding model. The report is available at:http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/schooling/innovations-in-partnership-schools-kura-hourua

CHILDFORUM SURVEY: A ChildForum survey of Early Childhood teachers has raised issues of understaffing and factory farming of children. Read more: http://www.childforum.com/policy-issues/surveys-and-ece-sector-a-family-data/1323-quality-report-teachers-views.html

CREATIVE SECTOR STUDY: A Creative Sectors Study by the Government will look at how creative industries are using copyright and designs rules in a changing technological environment. For more information on the Terms of Reference, see: http://www.mbie.govt.nz/info-services/business/intellectual-property/copyright/creative-sector-study and for information on the Government’s work in digital convergence see:http://www.convergencediscussion.nz/

COMMISSION CLEARS BEIJER: The Commerce Commission has given clearance for B100 Limited, a newly incorporated subsidiary of the Swedish refrigeration group Beijer Ref AB, to acquire the business and assets of Realcold Limited. A public version of the written reasons for the decision is available on the Clearances Register:http://www.comcom.govt.nz/business-competition/mergers-and-acquisitions/clearances/clearances-register/

DWELLING AND HOUSEHOLD ESTIMATES: Dwelling and Household Estimates provide estimates of all private dwellings in New Zealand at a given date, and estimates of all households usually living in New Zealand at a given date. Go here for more:http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/population/estimates_and_projections/DwellingHouseholdEstimates_HOTPSep15qtr.aspx

ENVIRONMENT MINISTER IN CHILE: Environment Minister Nick Smith delivered a speech to the Our Oceans Conference this week. For more information on the conference go to:http://www.nuestrooceano2015.gob.cl/en/conference/

FISHERIES REVIEW: New Zealand’s fisheries management system is going under the spotlight as part of a review to future-proof our fisheries. Find out more about the review and how to have your say:http://www.mpigovtnz.cwp.govt.nz/law-and-policy/legal-overviews/fisheries/fisheries-management-system-review/

FIZZ CONFERENCE: A conference to discuss the health effects and possible strategies to reduce sugary drink intake, with particular reference to Maori and Pacific communities was held today at Manukau Institute of Technology. More details on the conference are available at: http://www.fizz.org.nz/

GAMBLING CONSULTATION: Internal Affairs Minister Peter Dunne announced a package of measures on 7 October 2015 affecting non-casino gambling: the Class 4 sector. The Department has been asked to provide advice to the Minister on a possible wider review of the Class 4 sector. Further decisions about whether to proceed with any review will be made in early 2016. The consultation paper can be seen here:http://www.dia.govt.nz/diawebsite.nsf/wpg_URL/Services-Casino-and-Non-Casino-Gaming-Gambling-Consultation

GROWING LAND GRABS: New research shows that New Zealand is not the only country where foreign investors buy farmland. The Washington environmental and economic think tank, Worldwatch Institute, says it is part of a worldwide trend. Read more at: http://www.worldwatch.org/node/14725

MANUFACTURING FIRM WARNED: The Commerce Commission has issued a formal warning to manufacturing firm Consolidated Alloys (N.Z.) Limited (CA) over the inclusion of an anti-competitive clause in a negotiated settlement with roofing products competitor Edging Systems (NZ) Limited (ESL). A copy of the investigation report can be found here: http://www.comcom.govt.nz/business-competition/enforcement-response-register-commerce/investigation-reports/

NZ SUPER FUND: The NZ Super Fund’s 2014/2015 report released today shows it had $4.4 billion of its $29.54 billion portfolio invested in New Zealand compared to $3.7 billion a year earlier. The report is available at:http://www.nzsuperfund.cmail19.com/t/d-l-jtoiht-witydiuk-p/

And that’s our sampling of “news you can use” for Wednesday 7th October.

Brought to EveningReport by Newsroom Digest. –]]>

Bikers rev for breast cancer this Sunday

NewsroomPlus.com

Contributed by The New Zealand Breast Cancer Foundation

More than 350 “pinked out” motorbikes, from 50cc scooters to 2000cc Harley Davidson and Suzuki cruisers, are expected to take part in the Women’s International Motorcycle Association’s (WIMA) annual Pink Ribbon Ride in Auckland this Sunday October 11, raising funds for the NZ Breast Cancer Foundation.

WIMA Ride Photos 043

A similar ride will be held in Wellington, also on Sunday.

The Auckland ride departs from the AMI Auckland Netball Centre in St Johns at 10:30am sharp, and finishes at Western Springs Stadium by 11:15. Thanks to a police escort, riders will enjoy a rare uninterrupted ride through Auckland’s streets, with guaranteed green lights.

Anyone, male or female, is welcome to ride their motorcycle in the Pink Ribbon Ride, with a $10 badge purchase the suggested entry fee. Decorating bikes with pink paraphernalia is encouraged. Riders and the public can enjoy a barbecue, coffee vans and raffles at Western Springs Stadium at the end of the ride.

The ride can be watched from anywhere – it’ll be hard to miss – but a good vantage point to take in the whole spectacle is the pedestrian over bridge near Parnell Baths on Tamaki Drive.

This year is the 12th anniversary of the ride and it still amazes Christine Mudford, WIMA’s National Pink Ribbon Ride Co-ordinator how many riders attend for the first time each year.  “This event has proven to be very successful within the Motorcycle Charity Ride Calendar and the general public. It is a great event and I’m looking forward to a great turnout again this year.  People come from all around the region, often because of their own connection to this disease.”

Since the inaugural ride in 2004, WIMA has raised over $85,000 for The New Zealand Breast Cancer Foundation through its Auckland and Wellington events. “This is one of my favourite events in the October calendar as it always creates such an amazing atmosphere that brings together women, men and families,” said NZBCF chief executive Van Henderson.   “We so appreciate the money and awareness WIMA raises for us each year.”

Bikes will start arriving at the AMI Auckland Netball Centreoff Morrin Road in St Johns, from 9:00am on Sunday. The ride departs at 10:30am sharp, following Kohimarama Road, St Heliers Bay Rd, Tamaki Drive, Quay Street, Hobson Street, Pitt Street, Karangahape Road, Great North Road to Western Springs Stadium.

Breast Cancer survivors are welcome to join the ride, either as spectators or pillion riders.  Please contact Christine Mudford on 0274 792 660 to register your interest.

High res versions of the following images are attached:

–]]>

Bryce Edwards’ Political Roundup: Illusions of a Trans-Tasman partnership

]]>

Political Roundup by Dr Bryce Edwards.

[caption id="attachment_4808" align="alignleft" width="150"]Dr Bryce Edwards. Dr Bryce Edwards.[/caption]

Australia’s new policy of deporting law-breaking New Zealand-born residents, as well as keeping them in detention centres, has met with strong opposition in New Zealand. Valid criticisms are being made of the new situation, but are these objections founded on hypocrisy and myth?

The world is supposed to be becoming freer and more liberal. Whether via trade agreements or better relations between enlightened politicians, we’re meant to live in a globalising era of increased mobility of trade, capital, and labour. In tandem with this shift, the world is supposed to be becoming fairer, with greater protection of human rights and respect for the rule of law. Yet the latest human rights abuses of New Zealanders in Australia are an example of the illusion of political progress. 

The myth of free trans-Tasman movement

The best backgrounder on the new deportation and detention policies towards New Zealanders who have committed crimes is Ben Heather’s Deportation of hundreds of Kiwis has been brewing for more than a decade.

A more colourful report can be seen in Kim Vinnell’s seven-minute news report for TV3’s Story – see: Inside Australian detention centres holding Kiwis for deportation. See also her six-minute item, Aussies crack down on Kiwis with convictions.

These new policies are a significant change for those affected, and they point to a shift away from any notion of the two countries being a single market inside which citizens can freely shift. In a sense, the two countries are becoming less integrated, with reciprocal residential rights diminishing. But the fact that this has come about so easily and without any apparent official negotiations is because there has never been any entrenched or well-established agreement between Australia and New Zealand on these issues. 

This is a point well made by Matthew Hooton in his NBR column, Transtasman travel rights need codification (paywalled). He says that New Zealand has no treaty or official agreement with Australia that determines the free flow of people between the countries, and therefore the rules about travel or domestic entitlements can simply be changed on a whim: “There is, in fact, no formal right of New Zealanders to live and work in Australia and there never has been. CER makes no commitment to it, except, at a very long stretch, a reference in the preamble”.

Essentially New Zealanders in Australia are now finding out what it feels like to be “guest workers” in another country, part of a “foreign” labour force treated as second-class citizens at best. Of course these arrangements are normally thought of as occurring in places like the Gulf states, where many foreign workers are little more than semi-slaves. 

In this regard, Keith Rankin calls this the “Saudi-isation of Australia” – see: Australia’s Ireland – What exactly is New Zealand’s relationship with Australia? Here’s his main point: “We are now seeing the full playing-out of this new ‘guest worker’ relationship. New Zealand-born Australians have become substantial victims of a process within Australia in which a clear divide is growing between denizen workers and citizens. The Saudi-isation of Australia. New Zealand has to accept that it is not a much-loved bastard sibling of the former Australian colonies. Rather New Zealand is just another foreign nation dealing with an essentially xenophobic neighbour. We need to get used to this.”

New Zealand hypocrisy

New Zealanders are outraged about Australia’s actions. But is this hypocritical? After all, New Zealand hasn’t been in a hurry to condemn other recent violations of human rights by our “best mate”. As Janet McAllister puts it, we’ve been ignoring “the huge marsupial in the room”, so maybe we don’t really deserve to be listened to.

Adam Dudding says, “Perhaps we Kiwis could have been louder, earlier, in our condemnation of Australia’s increasingly dubious human rights record.  Since we’ve learnt about the Kiwis of Christmas Island, our complaints may look like self-interest” – see his excellent Letter to Australia: What the bloody hell are ya?, a colourful examination of how integrated – yet also very different – our countries are. 

Our relative silence has been particularly troubling when it comes to Australia’s treatment of refugees. Australia has been sending them to refugee centres for years, leading refugee advocate Tracey Barnett to ask: “Are ugly Australian immigration gulags just fine as long as Kiwis aren’t thrown in them?”

In Barnett’s article in the Herald, NZ blind to Aussie detention ‘gulags’, she condemns the New Zealand Government’s silence: “when it comes to indefinite detention of asylum arrivals in these same modern-day gulags – with no access to legal counsel, or family, or an end-date to their unknown sentence – what has New Zealand said about locking up some of the world’s most desperate – folks guilty of trying to find safety from war?  Not. A. Word”.

In fact before the latest trans-Tasman stoush, Janet McAllister wrote in Metro magazine about New Zealand’s failure to deal with injustice in our own neighbourhood – see: Why are we ignoring our nearest refugee bully?

She suggests that our outpouring of concern for refugees in Europe needs to be matched in our dealing with atrocities being committed by our best mate: “In their backyard shed, our best mates are torturing scared people who came to them for help; are we thinking about having a quiet word with them at the next neighbourhood barbecue?  Currently, we’re whistling with our hands in our pockets, craning our necks to see what’s happening over the horizon in Europe instead.”

Similarly, New Zealand journalist Michael Field ‏(@MichaelFieldNZ) who specialises in pacific issues, has been challenging New Zealand’s stance against Australia, with tweets such as: “NZ tears over people deported from Australia: yet ruthlessly did same to i-Kiribati man Ioane Teitiota & his NZ family refugees”, and “NZ crying over deportations from Australia yet NZ deports many to S’Pacific – irrespective of social disasters it creates like Tonga riot”. 

Field also wrote a very interesting blog post – which dates before the latest detention centre disagreement – suggesting that New Zealand also has a record of questionable deportation policies – see: Climate refugee jailed in NZ

While he points to the fact that the recent deportee Ioane Teitiota was put in prison before being removed from the country, Field also draws attention to 1970s attempts – prior to the “dawn raids” – to deport Samoans. 

Some New Zealanders are also supportive of current day Australian deportation policies. For example, looking at the thirty Australians in jail in New Zealand, Amy Maas reports that “Sensible Sentencing Trust founder Garth McVicar said New Zealand should take Australia’s approach and send them back. ‘Our law should be identical to Australia’s law when it comes to prisoners,’ he said” – see: Australian crims: ‘Send them home’.

The Sensible Sentencing Trust might also get support from some political parties. Government support party, the Maori Party has been voicing the need for New Zealand to replicate the Australian rules here. For example on TVNZ’s Q+A Maori Party Co-leader Marama Fox expressed disgust for what’s happening in Australia but also said “So is it time to bring in reciprocal legislation and say, ‘Well, okay, long gone the Anzac Spirit” – see her eight-minute interview: Maori Party on detaining and deporting Kiwis in Australia.

Of course, New Zealand is not immune to criticisms of human rights violations in the international arena either. This last week has seen investigative journalist Jon Stephenson win his defamation case against the New Zealand military, which related to his expose dealing with questions about New Zealand troops handing over Afghani detainees to authorities known to use torture – see Phil Taylor’s Defence Force settle defamation action with journalist

You can read Stephenson’s full original Metro article here: Eyes Wide Shut: The Government’s Guilty Secrets in Afghanistan

The myth of the special relationship

Most criticisms in New Zealand of the Australian Government’s new deportation and detention centre policies rest – not on human rights or justice – but more on the apparent degradation of the New Zealand’s special relationship with our neighbour. Everyone from the Prime Minister through to the newspaper editorials bemoan that the new policies mean that New Zealanders are no longer receiving special treatment from Australia. The subtext is that New Zealand doesn’t have a problem with Australia’s deportation and detention centre policies, but just that they are using them against New Zealanders. 

John Key has frequently spoken of the “Anzac bond and an Anzac spirit”, saying “that surely means we might get some treatment that’s different from other countries” – see the ABC report, New Zealand prime minister John Key says detainment of NZ citizens by Australia ‘not in Anzac spirit’

But does New Zealand really have a special relationship with Australia? Australian Brian Stoddart – now a resident in Queenstown – argues that ““Mainstream New Zealand must deal with the Australian reality and not an imagined special relationship” – see: Kiwis, Aussies frequently poles apart. He states that “The ‘special bond’’ may never have existed”, and that “Australian realpolitik and cultural pressure will always trump any warm, fuzzy feeling”. 

Is Australia becoming a rogue state?

Some of the strong criticism being levelled at Australia’s actions suggests that its reputation within the Pacific is becoming quite tarnished, as I’ve argued – see John Gibb’s Australia risks ‘pariah’ tag

Similarly, the head of the University of Otago law school, Prof Mark Henaghan, says ”It’s almost getting close to Guantanamo Bay” – see John Gibb’s Validity of detentions questioned. Henaghan explains “Holding some New Zealanders for months in remote Australian detention centres before deporting them invites comparison with detainees being held without trial at Guantanamo Bay”. He also suggests that Australia is not meeting its “obligations under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.”

It’s certainly true that Australia is falling foul of the United Nations over some of these issues. Earlier this year a UN report criticised Australia for systematic breaches of the international Convention Against Torture. The then prime minister, Tony Abbott responded in the way that rogue countries usually do, saying Australians were “sick of being lectured to by the United Nations”.  

Various columnists have also made strong statements about the way Australia is operating – the best are Rosemary McLeod’s Irony aplenty in how Australia treats immigrants and refugees and Brian Rudman’s Aussie deportations no better than penal colonies of old

For a particularly heart-felt – and Maori-focused – critique of what is happening, see the blog post Dawn raids, detention and deportation: the new Australian dream by Victoria University law lecturer Mamari Stephens.

And for a reminder that this isn’t just a handful of New Zealanders being affected by this change of law, see Tom McRae’s Up to 5000 convicts could be deported to NZ – lawyer

Multi-partisan consensus

In Australia there seems to be a very widespread consensus about the correctness of the new deportation and detention centre policy. As Audrey Young points out, “State discrimination imposed by John Howard’s Government has been upheld by successive leaders including Gillard” – see: For Australia the bonds of love do not go that far

Some Australian politicians are dissenting however, and on Sunday TVNZ’s Q+A programme had a nine-minute interview with the Australian Greens immigration spokesperson – see: Detaining and deporting Kiwis is concerning: Australian Greens. For a report on this, see Jo Moir’s Detention centres ‘a sore that will fester’ – Australian politician.

New Zealand politicians are remarkably united in their condemnation. See for example Phil Goff and Judith Collins’ opinion pieces, C’mon Aussies, give us a fair go

There are, however, some disagreements, particularly on the question of whether the New Zealand government is doing enough to persuade the Australia Government. 

In addition, Bill English has claimed that there is no evidence of abuse in the detention centres, which Labour’s Annette King has replied strongly to: “It probably shows a level of ignorance that you wouldn’t expect from the deputy Prime Minister of New Zealand – and a lack of compassion and feeling for the families and the children of those who are facing deportation and are locked up in a detention centre indefinitely” – see Radio New Zealand’s No evidence of mistreatment – English

Labour has also suggested that National hasn’t adequately responded to the issue, with King saying: “As it is it’s taken almost a year for the Government to get off its comfy backside and start talking, and that’s only after publicity around these arrangements forced its hand” – see Sam Sachdeva’s Annette King hits back at Bill English claims over detained Kiwis

But the most stunning political reaction to the issue has come from Government minister Peter Dunne, who has accused the National Government of responding to the Australia situation without adequate force – see Nicholas Jones’ Subservient response to Australia shows lack of spine: Peter Dunne. Here’s Dunne’s strong words: “In recent years our foreign policy has become too craven and trade-focussed and lacking a moral compass. In short, we have become too silent, lest we cause offence…. Relying on quiet words in diplomatic ears; nods and winks; pull-asides; text messages, or whatever, is not the way to conduct foreign policy – it is time to abandon the chin-dripping subservience we are lapsing into.”  

Labour’s David Shearer has also called for the Government to make louder protests about Australia’s human rights abuses, saying: “In the same way New Zealand has spoken out against human rights abuses in our smaller Pacific neighbours, we should be drawing world attention to those being committed by Australia” – see TV3’s Australian detention centres ‘extraordinarily bad’ – Labour.

Newspaper editorials have been united in condemnation of Australia – see the Herald’s Aussie policy on expulsion needs rethink, the Otago Daily Times’ Transtasman relationship, and the Dominion Post’s Deportation drive leaves bitter taste

Finally, for an Australian perspective on the issue – and use of the phrase “Kiwi killers” – see the 7-minute report from the television programme, A Current Affair, titled Kiwi Deports

]]>

Keith Rankin’s Chart for this Week: Shifts of Country Financial Balances before and after the Global Financial Crisis

]]>

Analysis by Keith Rankin.

[caption id="attachment_7595" align="aligncenter" width="640"]Anglo, Eurozone, Japan and BRIC financial shifts. Anglo, Eurozone, Japan and BRIC financial shifts.[/caption]

This week’s chart looks at shifting private-sector and public-sector balances, before and after the 2008-09 global financial crisis.

This chart is structured the same as last week’s chart, which showed medium-long-term average financial balances (surpluses and deficits) in countries’ private and public sectors. This week’s chart takes a selection of countries in the anglosphere (such as New Zealand), the Eurozone, Japan and the four BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) economies.

The first point for us to note is that New Zealand – exceptional as ever – is the only one of these countries that in 2010-14 did not inhabit Quadrant 2, the zone of private sector surpluses and government sector deficits.

The bigger issue for the world economy is the convergence of national economies in this quadrant, with the general pattern of movement being decreased government balances (bigger deficits) and increased private surpluses.

The systemic constraint is the line of current account balance. When countries on the right side of this line move further from the line (and countries on the left side move closer to that line or across that line), that movement must be offset by movements towards or across the line by other countries to the right of the line (or by movements away from the line by other countries to its left). Shifts to the right or up must be countered by other-country shifts left or down.

Some shifts are intended; others are induced or resisted. Where these intended shifts are in the government sector, it represents government fiscal policy. Since 2010 government fiscal policies have generally been tight (or even austere), meaning that government are wanting to move towards Quadrant 1 or Quadrant 4. Only two countries have shown any success in this regards: China and Germany.

The Eurozone governments clearly want to take the Eurozone towards Quadrant 1. That pathway is entrenched in European Union fiscal policies, just as, since 1994, it has been entrenched in New Zealand that governments should run financial surpluses. Only Germany (and Uzbekistan, not shown) have really succeeded in defying the trend to falling government balances. Germany is able to do this because, for it, the Eurozone structure represents an exchange rate mechanism that pushes Germany towards the desired ‘golden mountain’ that epitomises Quadrant 1 (see my Germany, the Eurozone and Mercantilism, 29 September).

Where has the systemic accommodation taken place, which has allowed Germany and other European countries to raise their current account balances? Clearly the most important accommodators have been the BRIC economies plus Canada. Brazil, India and China have accommodated through lower private sector balances – more private sector borrowing – whereas Russia and Canada have largely accommodated through either less government revenue or more government borrowing. We note that such accommodation, as seen in Canada, is unintended in the current global policy environment. Russia and Brazil are now in deep recession. Canada’s economic growth has taken a deeper dive than has Australia’s; with unemployment at 7% and rising, economic conditions there are portentous for the coming election. Economic conditions in China are also distinctly wobbly.

The countries shown that are least in crisis (excluding Germany and New Zealand) are the ones with the largest government deficits: USA, UK, India, and Japan. Even Spain is seeing high government deficits helping it to recover from its crisis. (Ireland, likewise. Ireland goes off the chart, beyond Japan and Spain.)

In general, intended shifts down (government sector) and left (private sector) have expansionary global effects; intended shifts up (government sector) and to the right (private sector) have contractionary implications for the world economy. While each country’s economy has its own story to tell, many shifts are unintended. Germany is succeeding in building a monetary mountain in its private sector, pushing some other countries towards the red debt mountain (Quadrant 3), while also – through an undervalued exchange rate and rising inequality – denying its residents the consumption benefits of its growing export receipts.

In the last two years, New Zealand has been moving back towards Quadrant 4, reflecting its financial personality; living on the edge and for the most part getting away with it. I would prefer New Zealand to run a more equal balance between its government and private sectors; bigger government and smaller private deficits. There is much scope for New Zealand central and local governments to borrow and spend more. New Zealand can sit comfortably in Quadrant 3, for example with both private and government balances averaging about -2% of GDP.

]]>

Jane Kelsey: Continued imbalance of TPPA information indefensible – Government needs to release the text and documentation now

]]>

Source: Professor Jane Kelsey.

Twenty four hours after the ministerial meeting concluded more details of the final Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) are emerging. But the New Zealand Government will not make the agreement’s text available for scrutiny for at least another month.

[caption id="attachment_6181" align="alignleft" width="150"]Professor Jane Kelsey. Professor Jane Kelsey.[/caption]

In a statement issued overnight Auckland University Professor Jane Kelsey said: “We face a situation where the government has access to the full text, and those of us who have been critical of the agreement have to rely on information we can secure from offshore to cross-check the government’s spin. The idea we must wait for at least another month before we can fully test the government’s claims makes informed democratic debate impossible.”

Professor Kelsey said: “The government needs to take the initiative and release the text and supporting documents now so we can all conduct the necessary in depth analyses.”

For example, the government has confirmed that the concrete economic gains it anticipates from the deal is just $259 million a year when fully implemented, which can take at least another 15 years. That gets inflated to $2.7 billion a year by 2030, presumably based on modelling various ‘dynamic effects’ and other speculated and intangible benefits. 

“This kind of modelling is notoriously problematic,” says Professor Kelsey.

The Sustainability Council showed the methodology used in the Peterson Institute study that the government has previously relied on was deeply flawed. They also fail to address the kind of costs that the Australian Productivity Commission considers must be factored into a comprehensive cost benefit analysis, and which make it higlhy sceptical of such agreements. That reinforces the need for a genuinely independent cost-benefit analysis.

Minister Groser has previously refused to release any such studies or cost-benefit analyses requested under the Official Information Act.

Professor Kelsey observes that the lack of any formal text has also created confusion over crucial public health issues. Further information about the wording Australia won on biologics (not itself formally released) confirms the Minister’s view that New Zealand’s current system of 5 years data protection plus additional processing time should satisfy  its terms.

It remains to be seen whether the US Congress and Big Pharma will contest that during the US legislative process and through certification, especially as USTR Froman said the goal was to have a comparable outcome from the two options on biologics – the second being a monopoly for 5+3 years.

New Zealand’s patent laws also apparently meet the final threshold set in the intellectual property chapter. While the transparency annex affecting Pharmac’s processes is problematic, it is not directly enforceable. 

“All that is good news for New Zealanders, although not some other TPPA countries. It will be a massive relief to the public health community and patients, although we still need to know the areas where the Minister says some additional expense will be incurred.”

However, other barriers to health policy remain, especially with investor-state dispute settlement.  Even the weak public health exception does not apply to the investment chapter, and the tobacco exception appears to apply on a case-by-case basis only to certain kinds of investment claims, if a government chooses to invoke it, and not to the whole agreement.

Professor Kelsey paid tribute to the pressure brought by doctors, the Australian government’s determination to fight on biologics, and New Zealand’s intellectual property negotiators.

]]>

NewsRoom Digest: Top NZ News Items for October 06, 2015

]]>

Newsroom Digest

This edition of NewsRoom_Digest features 8 resourceful links of the day and the politics pulse from Tuesday 6th October.

NEWSROOM_MONITOR

Top stories in the current news cycle include the Prime Minister John Key hailing the conclusion of the Trans-Pacific Partnership as a success, Hamilton real estate agent Simon Lugton saying Auckland investors have pushed up house prices by 15% in the city since January and new figures showing 564 people have died by suicide in the last year – the highest number since records began eight years ago. 

Note: As well as providing a precis of leading broadcast bulletins each day, our NewsRoom_Monitor service does a daily paper round with succinct ‘news picks’ from the main metropolitan papers emailed by 9am each morning. If you’re interested in a free trial please email monitor@newsroom.co.nz

POLITICS PULSE

Media releases issued from Parliament by political parties today included:

Government: Working prisons programme on track; PM welcomes TPP as NZ’s biggest trade deal; OECD releases full BEPS action plan; TPP a win for regional New Zealand; Diversification through innovation is key to Business Growth Agenda; TPP a win for regional New Zealand; Ambitious target set for rural broadband; Panels consider prisoners’ temporary release

ACT Party: Welcomes important progress for our trading nation

Greens:Greens Celebrate $120 Million Savings From Banking Tender; Bad TPPA deal will cost New Zealanders; Green Party MP Visits Christchurch Solar Home; Bee-killing pesticides need to go; Sacrificing habitat of threatened species for irrigation reservoir is a bad deal

Labour: New Zealand has missed the bus on TPP; TPPA fails dairy and foreign buyers tests; Govt should act now on OECD tax changes; Groser playing games over Pharmac fallout; Lowest business confidence in over four years; Suicide prevention needs to focus on red flags

New Zealand First: TPPA deal not what government promised; New bill to stop secrecy of future deals like TPPA; Minister fails to address winz security

NZ National Party: TPP will deliver significant benefits to NZ

LINKS OF THE DAY

Links of the day have been a feature of NewsRoom_Digest since we first started production in August 2014 at newsroom-nz.tumblr.com. We are currently building an archive of these at:http://newsroomplus.com/resources/resourceful-links/

BUSINESS SOCIAL MEDIA SURVEY: Four independent, national businesses have joined forces to determine how successful social media is for New Zealand business. The inaugural online survey will provide details on the most popular social media platforms and how small and large businesses are using.To participate, go here :http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/2316434/Social-Media-New-Zealand

BUSINESS GROWTH AGENDA: Science and Innovation Minister Steven Joyce has outlined Government’s strategy for developing New Zealand into a hub for high-value and knowledge-intensive businesses that are conducting more research and development (R&D) to lift innovation. The BGA Building Innovation update can be found herehttp://www.mbie.govt.nz/info-services/business/business-growth-agenda/towards-2025

NZIER SURVEY OF BUSINESS OPINION: The latest NZIER Quarterly Survey of Business Opinion shows business confidence falling to its lowest level since March 2011. A net 9 percent of businesses now expect deterioration in the New Zealand economy over the coming months. Read more: http://nzier.org.nz/media/business-confidence-drops-but-firms-own-activity-remains-healthy-quarterly-survey-of-business-opinion-october-2015

OECD RELEASES FULL BEPS ACTION PLAN: The OECD has released its final package of actions to address base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS). Go here for details: http://www.oecd.org/tax/beps.htm

PwC REVENUES INCREASE: The PwC network reported total global gross revenues of US$35.4 billion for the fiscal year ended on 30 June 2015. Go here for more: http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/about/global-annual-review-2015/revenues.html

SUICIDE PREVENTION: The Mental Health Foundation acknowledges the family, whanau and friends of the 564 New Zealanders who died by suicide in the last year.More information about suicide prevention, including what to do when you’re worried about someone, coping with suicidal thoughts and what to do after a suicide attempt can be found at http://www.mentalhealth.org.nz/suicideprevention

TPP QUESTIONS & ANSWERS: The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) is a free trade agreement between 12 Asia-Pacific countries that liberalises trade and sets consistent rules to make it easier to do business across the region. More information on specific outcomes for industry sectors can be found at http://www.tpp.mfat.govt.nz/ 

TPP IMPACTS ON MARKET: After several years of negotiations, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement was settled early this morning. Westpac briefly reviews the implications for the New Zealand economy and financial markets here: https://wibiq.westpac.com.au/NZPublications.aspx?PublicationId=15745&customerid=9053

And that’s our sampling of “news you can use” for Tuesday 6th October.

Brought to EveningReport by Newsroom Digest. –]]>

TPPA Feature: Critics Slam NZ Government Over TPPA ‘Betrayal’ While US-Australia-IMF Celebrate Deal

UPDATED: TPPA Special Feature by Evening Report. Click here for the latest raw news reaction to the TPP deal.

[caption id="attachment_6181" align="alignleft" width="150"]Professor Jane Kelsey. Professor Jane Kelsey.[/caption]

Outspoken critic of the Trans Pacific Partnership, Professor Jane Kelsey, has lambasted the New Zealand Government for ignoring its citizens. She said it is an insult to all New Zealanders and that the Trans Pacific Partnership deal is “a travesty of democracy”.

Negotiators of the 12 nations of the Trans-Pacific Partnership this week concluded talks in Atlanta, USA, settling on a proposed agreement that the New Zealand Government said will be worth $2.7 billion for New Zealand by 2030.

The proposed agreement will require ratification by the twelve governments. They are: the USA, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Chile, Peru, Mexico, Japan, Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, Brunei.

Professor Kelsey said today: “Minister Groser has misled New Zealanders. He always knew he was on a hiding to nothing on dairy. I have predicted many times that he would not do as he said and walk away from a lousy deal, but would make claim that there were some intangible future gains from being in the club.  That’s exactly what’s happened.”

She urged New Zealanders to ask a simple question:”who gave the Prime Minister and Trade Minister the right to sacrifice our rights to affordable medicine, to regulate foreign investment, to decide our own copyright laws, to set up new SOEs, and whatever else they have agreed to in this secret deal and present it to us as a fait accompli?”

Professor Kelsey said last major sticking point was monopoly rights for Big Pharma over life saving medicines, showing the TPPA is anything but a ‘free  trade’ deal.

“The compromise language on biologic medicines agreed between the US and Australia is apparently so vague the US can and will insist that its intepretation prevails. Giving Big Pharma another three years monopoly over the data, on top of other changes to patents and more leverage over decisions, will undermine the “fundamentals” of Pharmac and blow out the medicines bill.”

She said while Australia was fighting US demands on medicines, the New Zealand Government “seemed to be lost in action and obsessed with selling more dairy”.

“Not only is a “dairy for medicines” deal unconscionable – it is a total sellout. That’s even before we factor in the handcuffs on future governments in investment, SOEs, financial services, government procurement, and so much more,” Professor Kelsey said.

Dairy CowsMeanwhile dairy export giant Fonterra stated this morning the TPP was a “small but significant step forward” for the dairy sector. (ref. ForeignAffairs.co.nz)

Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited Chairman John Wilson said Dairy has been very hard to resolve and New Zealand has managed to get some progress against the odds.

“Our team has done well to lift the deal from where it stood at the Ministerial meeting in Maui,” Wilson said.

He believed “entrenched protectionism” demonstrated by the US dairy industry in particular had ensured that the deal on dairy failed to reach its potential.

Wilson added: “While I am very disappointed that the deal falls far short of TPP’s original ambition to eliminate all tariffs, there will be some useful gains for New Zealand dairy exporters in key TPP markets such as the US, Canada and Japan. Greater benefits will be seen in future years as tariffs on some product lines are eliminated.”

But Professor Kelsey said: “I suspect any new dairy access is largely smoke and mirrors, with quotas on carefully selected products and subject to safeguards should increased New Zealand imports impact on America’s domestic agriculture. The problem is we can’t see the details to assess that.”

Under the US Fast Track law, President Obama needs to give 90 days notice to Congress before he can sign, and release the text 30 days into that period.

“The government is bound to spin the benefits like crazy, knowing that we won’t get to see the real deal for another month. The Minister needs to release the full details immediately,” Professor Kelsey said.

Members of the US Congress and the corporate lobbyists who are ‘cleared advisers’ will get to see the deal.

Professor Kelsey predicts: “they will be all over it, and seeking to remove what they still don’t like and add their demands. That will be the first of many opportunities to rewrite the deal as the US moves into an election year. The immediate responses from the US show it will be a dog fight in Congress with almost all the Democrat members opposing the  deal and Republicans abandoning Obama in droves.”

She said the TPP deal is far from concluded.

“There are three months before the TPPA can be signed. The government’s “trust us” promises were a sham and New Zealanders have been sold down the river.

“It is time for Opposition parties and ordinary New Zealanders to force the government to step away, and make it clear to National that failing to do so will carry the ultimate electoral penalty,” Professor Kelsey said.

[caption id="attachment_2124" align="alignleft" width="150"]Prime Minister John Key. Prime Minister John Key.[/caption] New Zealand Prime Minister John Key has welcomed the conclusion of negotiations – stating that the TPP is New Zealand’s biggest free trade agreement. (ref. ForeignAffairs.co.nz) “This agreement will give our exporters much better access to a market of more than 800 million customers in 11 countries across Asia and the Pacific, and help Kiwi firms do business overseas,” Mr Key said. “In particular, TPP represents New Zealand’s first FTA relationship with the largest and third-largest economies in the world – the United States and Japan. Successive New Zealand governments have been working to achieve this for 25 years.” TPP has been a significant focus for the National-led Government, as part of its wider plan to diversify the economy by building strong trade, investment and economic ties around the world. “As a country, we won’t get rich selling things to ourselves. Instead, we need to sell more of our products and services to customers around the world, and TPP helps makes that happen,” Mr Key said. TPP will eliminate tariffs on 93 per cent of New Zealand’s exports to our new FTA partners, the United States, Japan, Canada, Mexico, and Peru. Dairy exporters will have access to these markets through newly created quotas, in addition to tariff elimination on a number of products. Tariffs on all other New Zealand exports to TPP countries will be eliminated, with the exception of beef exports to Japan, where tariffs will reduce significantly. [caption id="attachment_7208" align="alignleft" width="150"]Trade Minister Tim Groser. Trade Minister Tim Groser.[/caption]

Trade Minister Tim Groser said the most significant change is an extension of New Zealand’s copyright period from 50 years to 70 years. (ref. ForeignAffairs.co.nz)

According to Groser, the cost of this to consumers and businesses will be small to begin with and increases gradually over a 20-year period.

“Other potentially far-reaching or costly proposals raised earlier in the negotiations were not included in the final agreement,” Mr Groser said.

“Consumers will not pay more for subsidised medicines as a result of TPP and few additional costs are expected for the Government in the area of pharmaceuticals. There will also be no change to the PHARMAC model.

“Regarding data protection for biologic medicines, New Zealand’s existing policy settings and practices will be adequate to meet the provisions we have finally agreed on,” Groser said.

[caption id="attachment_7574" align="alignleft" width="150"]IMF managing director Christine Lagarde. IMF managing director Christine Lagarde.[/caption]

The International Monetary Fund’s managing director, Christine Lagarde, confirmed in a statement today that the IMF has called for a policy upgrade “to avoid a new mediocre in the global economy”. (ref. ForeignAffairs.co.nz)

Lagarde said, rekindling trade is an essential component of this agenda: “The agreement is not only important because of the size, as the signatories countries account for about 40 percent of global GDP; it also pushes the frontier of trade and investment in goods and services to new areas where gains can be significant.

“We would need to review all the details before offering a comprehensive assessment, including the transitional effects and spillovers, but I expect that the TPP can pave the way to a new generation of deep trade integration efforts. I encourage other countries to renew their efforts to complete ongoing negotiations and the broader international community to reignite multilateral trade initiatives to ensure a cohesive global trading system,” Lagarde said. [caption id="attachment_7575" align="alignleft" width="300"]White House. White House.[/caption]

In a statement issued by the White House, the USA’s Obama Administration said the TPP levels the playing field for American workers and American businesses by eliminating over 18,000 taxes that various countries impose on Made in America exports, providing unprecedented access to vital new markets in the Asia-Pacific region for U.S. workers, businesses, farmers, and ranchers. (ref. ForeignAffairs.co.nz)

The White House stated the TPP puts American workers first by establishing the highest labor standards of any trade agreement in history, requiring all countries to meet core, enforceable labor standards as stated in the International Labor Organization’s (ILO) Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work.

“The fully-enforceable labor standards we have won in TPP include the freedom to form unions and bargain collectively; prohibitions against child labor and forced labor; requirements for acceptable conditions of work such as minimum wage, hours of work, and safe workplace conditions; and protections against employment discrimination. These enforceable requirements will help our workers compete fairly and reverse a status quo that disadvantages our workers through a race to the bottom on international labor standards,” the Whitehouse stated. [caption id="attachment_7576" align="alignleft" width="240"]President Barack Obama - Official White House Photo by Pete Souza. President Barack Obama – Official White House Photo by Pete Souza.[/caption]

US President Barack Obama said today: “When more than 95 percent of our potential customers live outside our borders, we can’t let countries like China write the rules of the global economy. We should write those rules, opening new markets to American products while setting high standards for protecting workers and preserving our environment.” (ref. ForeignAffairs.co.nz)

He added: “Once negotiators have finalized the text of this partnership, Congress and the American people will have months to read every word before I sign it. I look forward to working with lawmakers from both parties as they consider this agreement. If we can get this agreement to my desk, then we can help our businesses sell more Made in America goods and services around the world, and we can help more American workers compete and win.”

Australian Coat of ArmsThe Australian Federal Government stated today: “Australia and the Asia-Pacific region are undergoing significant economic transformation. The TPP allows us to harness the enormous opportunities this presents as we look to build a modern Australian economy that can face the challenges of the 21st century.

“The TPP writes regional trade rules which will drive Australia’s integration in the region and underpin our prosperity.   It builds on Australia’s successes in concluding trade agreements with China, Japan and Korea and delivers more again.  As a regional trade agreement, the TPP creates benefits for consumers and businesses beyond those that can be achieved under bilateral FTAs – helping to create jobs and a stronger Australian economy.” (ref. ForeignAffairs.co.nz) China thumbs upThe People’s Republic of China’s Ministry of Commerce (MOC) was encouraging of the TPP. It stated Tuesday, that China is open to any mechanism that follows rules of the World Trade Organization and can boost the economic integration of the Asia-Pacific, said a statement on the MOC website. China hopes the TPP pact and other free trade arrangements in the region can boost each other and contribute to the Asia-Pacific’s trade, investment and economic growth, it said. (ref. ForeignAffairs.co.nz)
[caption id="attachment_7585" align="alignleft" width="150"]Greenpeace's Emma Gibson. Greenpeace’s Emma Gibson.[/caption] From Sydney, Emma Gibson, Head of Program for Greenpeace Australia Pacific said Greenpeace is not opposed to freeing up international trade, but harbours concerns that without proper transparency, the TPP may lead to worse social and environmental outcomes. (ref. ForeignAffairs.co.nz)

“We are calling on the government to make public the text of the agreement, so we can properly assess its impact on Australia.

“From what little detail has been leaked, we are concerned over a provision allowing multinational corporations to challenge domestic regulations and court rulings before special tribunals.

“This could mean, for example, that if an Australian court decided that a mining project was environmentally hazardous and therefore should not be approved, a multinational backer could seek to overturn that decision in a special tribunal.

–]]>

Confidence Up Over New Zealand Economy

Source: BNZ – BNZ’s Confidence Survey Suggests Most Most Sectors Doing Okay The latest BNZ Confidence Survey has found that in most sectors respondents are seeing things as either steady or improving. Construction and engineering are strong, manufacturing doing well, farming is weak but dairy farmers are pulling back from the brink. The Auckland residential real estate market is cooling, but elsewhere things look firm. With regard to specific sectors the following broad comments can be made. Accountancy Appears as steady as ever. No indication of any downturn. Advertising and Marketing Some restructuring pressures amongst the big players but customer demand appears good. Construction Overwhelmingly strong comments nationwide. Education Strong offshore demand to study in NZ. Engineering Very strong. Farming A pullback from the brink in dairying bringing some smiles, but no optimism of strong returns in the near future. Forestry Three comments, all positive. Horticulture Strong Legal Firm, nothing really changing. Manufacturing All bar two comments indicate things good and/or getting better. A sector still going through a reasonably good period. Property Management/Investment Some evidence of willingness of investors to buy easing off for now. Property – Non-residential/Commercial Rents rising, but comments on conditions highly variable – probably reflecting regional factors. Recruitment Highly mixed comments. No firm evidence of any major easing in employee demand. Residential Real Estate In Auckland – far fewer people at Open Homes, auction clearance rates down, fewer Asian buyers in evidence. Outside Auckland strong. Retail Farm area spending down, but apart from that things look okay. It pays to remember however that this is a sector with many operators who can experience vastly different operating conditions even located right next to each other. Tourism The lower NZ dollar is definitely helping sales. Now that the Confidence Survey is up and running again and we’ve seen where the response numbers are settling down we shall change it to a quarterly basis with the next survey to be run at the end of the end of November then February, May, and August.

Click here for the full Confidence Survey including industry comments submitted by respondents.

]]>

Iwi smoking on the decline but still more work to be done

NewsroomPlus.com

Contributed by the National Māori Tobacco Control Leadership

According to the latest census, all iwi have seen a significant drop in their numbers of regular smokers with an average decrease of around nine to ten per cent from 2006-2013.

image001

81 per cent of Māori now live in urban areas, at least one-third live outside their tribal influence, more than one-quarter do not know their iwi or do not choose to affiliate with it, and at least 70 per cent live outside the traditional tribal territory.

image002

Ngā Puhi, New Zealand’s largest iwi saw the biggest drop in numbers of regular smokers with a decrease of 9.9% followed closely by Ngāti Tuwharetoa and Tūhoe. Iwi with the smallest numbers of regular smokers include Ngāi Tahu, Ngāti Maniapoto and Ngā Puhi. All three of these iwi sit under the national smoking rate for Māori of 32.7%. Conversely, iwi like Tūhoe (38.2%) Waikato, Ngāti Maniapoto and Ngāti Tuwharetoa currently sit above the Māori national average. The national average is 15%, which means Māori are smoking at just over double the rate of the general population.

Maybe unsurprising, as the number of regular smokers has declined, the number of Māori who identify as “never smokers” or smokefree has increased. Being smokefree and tobacco free is now the norm for all iwi. “A thriving iwi needs thriving descendants. A focus on iwi health will be a major focus” says Naida Glavish spokesperson Whānau Ora Iwi Leaders Forum.

In 2010 Ngāti Kahungunu, the third largest tribe in New Zealand, became the first iwi to develop a comprehensive strategy to rid tobacco from the lives of its people. The Strategy incorporates a blend of both tobacco control strategies such as using cessation services and traditional cultural lore (tikanga) that will remove not only the use of tobacco products but also the carrying of tobacco on to sites such as marae and wāhi tapu (sacred sites). The Ngāti Kahungunu strategy is also included as part of the Hawkes Bay District Health Board’s tobacco free policy.

More recently, in 2014 the Iwi Leaders Forum committed to the Tupeka Kore 2025 goal.  “The networks and relationships that iwi have mean they are able to reach whānau at a level government agencies cannot” says Zoe Martin-Hawke.

–]]>

Paul Buchanan: Unanswered Questions About the Jon Stephenson V NZ Defence Force Case

]]>

Opinion by Dr Paul G. Buchanan. This article was originally published on Kiwipolitico.com.
See Also:
[caption id="attachment_4185" align="alignright" width="150"]Dr Paul G. Buchanan, principal of 36th Parallel Assessments. Dr Paul G. Buchanan, principal of 36th Parallel Assessments.[/caption]

Although it has been shamefully underreported by major media outlets in NZ, war correspondent Jon Stephenson has won his defamation case against the New Zealand Defence Force by forcing a settlement that involves significant compensation and an admission by the military that its defamatory statements about Mr. Stephenson were indeed untrue.

It remains to be seen if the Prime Minister John Key will do the same, since he opined at the time the controversy erupted over Mr. Stephenson’s internationally recognised article “Eyes Wide Shut” in Metro Magazine (May 2011) that Mr. Stephenson was, to paraphrase closely, “unstable” as well as “unreliable.”

That has been proven to be false. Let us be clear: Mr. Stephenson may be driven, but unlike his main accusers when it comes to reporting on the NZDF he is by no means unreliable or a liar.

I wrote the following as a comment over at The Standard but feel that it is worth sharing here:

“I suspect that we have only seen the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the unethical behaviour of the NZDF and political leadership in this affair. Remember that there is a MoD involved and the respective ministers then and now (Coleman and Brownlee). There are more officers involved than retired generals Rhys Jones and Jerry Mateparae, some who currently hold senior positions within the NZDF. There is the behaviour of Crown Law to consider. There is the slander on Jon’s character uttered by the PM.

I can only hope that the terms of the settlement do not prevent Jon from publishing more details of his case, including the way in which the legal process unfolded, the obstacles to discovery encountered, and the extra-curriculars surrounding them.

[caption id="attachment_7549" align="alignright" width="300"]Jon Stephenson - Image courtesy of Metro magazine. Jon-Stephenson – Image courtesy of Metro magazine.[/caption]

Whatever happens, for once in a long time one of the genuine good guys won. Were it that other members of the press corps (Nicky Hager excepted) had the integrity and courage exhibited by Jon both in the field as well as on the home front.

Kia kaha Jon!”

Beyond what I have written above, there are some other questions that arise from this saga.

For example, in 2013 Nicky Hager revealed that the NZDF electronically spied on Mr. Stephenson in 2012 using NSA, GCSB and SIS assets while he was in Afghanistan.

At the same time an internal Defence manual was leaked to the media that identified “certain investigative journalists” as hostile subversion threats requiring counteraction because they might obtain politically sensitive information (one does not have to have much imagination in order to figure out who they are referring to). In parallel, reports emerged that NZDF officials were sharing their views of Mr. Stephenson with Afghan counterparts, referring to him in the same derogatory terms and implying that his work was traitorous or treasonous.

Taken together, both the spying on Mr. Stephenson and the characterisation of him passed on to NZDF Afghan allies can be seen as a means of counteracting his reporting.

But if so, what national security threat did he really pose?

Is politically sensitive information necessarily a threat to national security or is merely a threat to the political actors being reported on?

Is intimidation part of what the NZDF considers to be proper counteraction when it comes to journalists plying their trade in a war zone?

And since any counteraction or counter-intelligence operations had to be cleared and authorised by the NZDF and political leadership, were both of the types used against Mr. Stephenson authorised by then NZDF Chief Lieutenant General Richard Rhys Jones and/or Mr. Key?

They deny doing so but if that is true, who did and how was it passed down the chain of command to the field commanders in Afghanistan (because, at a minimum, the order to “counter” Mr. Stephenson could be construed as illegal and therefore challengeable–but it never was)?

Leaving aside the legitimate role of independent journalism in a democracy in holding policy makers–including military leaders–to account, what does it say about the NZDF that it sees such work as subversive?

More alarmingly, if the reports are true, what exactly did the NZDF leadership hope to accomplish by telling Afghans, while Mr. Stephenson was in Afghanistan, that he was a threat to them?

[caption id="attachment_7550" align="alignright" width="300"]Lieutenant General Rhys Jones (left) and Sir Jerry Mateparae (centre). Image: NZ Navy. Lieutenant General Rhys Jones (left) and Sir Jerry Mateparae (centre). Image: NZ Navy.[/caption]

Then there is the issue of the lie. General Rhys Jones claimed that, contrary to what was written in his story, Mr. Stephenson never visited the base in which the Crisis Response Unit (to which NZ SAS were attached) was located and did not talk to its commander. That was a direct challenge to Mr. Stephenson’s journalistic integrity. Mr. Stephenson sued for defamation and during the first trial (which bizarrely ended in a hung jury) the NZDF and Rhys Jones himself admitted that Mr. Stephenson’s version was true.

So why didn’t the trial stop right there?

The moment the truth of Mr. Stephenson’s story was admitted by Rhys Jones, it was supposed to be game, set and match to the journalist.

But instead the Crown spent hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars continuing to litigate in that trial and then the follow-up court process that was ended by the recently announced settlement. Why so?

The answer to the last questions seems to be that, like in the Zaoui and Urewera 18 case, the Crown prefers to bleed its adversaries emotionally and financially even when it knows that it can not win. This death by a thousand cuts approach, courtesy of the taxpayers largesse, is as unethical as it is cynical and undermines the belief that justice in New Zealand is blind and universal.

There are many other questions that need to be answered about the treatment of Mr. Stephenson.

  • Is it true that media outlets were pressured to not accept his work on penalty of getting the cold shoulder from the government?
  • Did NZDF officials physically threaten Mr. Stephenson in New Zealand?
  • Did the intelligence services spy on Mr. Stephenson above and beyond what was reported by Mr. Hager, both at home and abroad, and are they doing so now, and on what grounds if so?
  • Did NZDF and/or MoD and/or PMDC and/or Crown Law officials conspire, either solely or together,  to cover up, obstruct, alter, destroy or otherwise impede the release of evidence to Mr. Stephenson’s lawyers at any point in the legal proceedings?

My sincere hope is that the settlement agreed to by Mr. Stephenson and NZDF does not preclude the former from writing about his experiences with the NZDF, both in Afghanistan and during the trials. Hopefully he will be able to answer some of the questions I have posed above. I say this because something stinks about the way this affair has been handled at the highest levels of government, which is not only a stain on the individuals involved but a direct affront to basic tenets of liberal democracy.

[caption id="attachment_7548" align="aligncenter" width="963"]Metro - Eyes Wide Shut, May 2011. Metro – Eyes Wide Shut, May 2011.[/caption]

]]>

NewsRoom Digest: Top NZ News Items for October 05, 2015

]]>

Newsroom Digest

This edition of NewsRoom_Digest features 13 resourceful links of the day and the politics pulse from Monday 5th October.

NEWSROOM_MONITOR

Top stories in the current news cycle include the Government launching the first ever National Science Strategy which aims to increase funding for science, the Council of Trade Unions saying WorkSafe has stepped up but is still not fully doing its job as a safety regulator and further delays on an announcement on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) until tomorrow morning.

Note: As well as providing a precis of leading broadcast bulletins each day, our NewsRoom_Monitor service does a daily paper round with succinct ‘news picks’ from the main metropolitan papers emailed by 9am each morning. If you’re interested in a free trial please email monitor@newsroom.co.nz

POLITICS PULSE

Media releases issued from Parliament by political parties today included:

Government: Ranga-Bidois Whānau Papakāinga ‘an outstanding example of a whānau-led housing initiative’; Māori Housing Network to build on Māori housing success; Fijians urged to treasure their language; Supporting people with mental health issues;First National Science Strategy launched; Changes to strengthen international science fund; Waitangi Tribunal decision;Six banks awarded All-of-Government contracts; English to IMF and World Bank this week

Labour: Sexual assault at Wiri prison another Serco failure; Seven year science wait wasn’t worth it; English should send himself to Australia

New Zealand First: Clark urges TPPA signing but we’ve had other poor deals; Speech: Circus or Soap Opera and Foreseen Circumstances; New Zealand First Congratulates Dr Joe Williams

LINKS OF THE DAY

Links of the day have been a feature of NewsRoom_Digest since we first started production in August 2014 at newsroom-nz.tumblr.com. We are currently building an archive of these at:http://newsroomplus.com/resources/resourceful-links/

ENVIRONMENT REPORT: Caritas Aotearoa New Zealand’s State of the Environment Report for Oceania 2015 – Caring for our Common Home was presented today in Wellington. Read more:http://www.caritas.org.nz/sites/default/files/PER_2015_web.pdf

FIJI LANGUAGE WEEK: Fiji Language Week begins today, with the theme “Noqu vosa, noqu iyau talei – My language, my treasure”. A list of events marking Fiji Language Week may be found at http://www.mpia.govt.nz

FIREWORKS RULES: The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) is reminding importers and retailers of their obligations around the importation, sale and safe storage of fireworks. Read Your Guide to Selling Retail Fireworkshttp://www.epa.govt.nz/Publications/Your-Guide-to-Selling-Retail-Fireworks.pdf and about importing fireworks:http://www.epa.govt.nz/hazardous-substances/importing-manufacturing/explosives/Pages/Retail%20Fireworks.aspx

FMA REPORT: The Financial Markets Authority’s (FMA) latest report into KiwiSaver activity shows funds flowing into KiwiSaver at an all-time high during the 12 months to 31 March 2015. View the Report here:http://fma.govt.nz/assets/Reports/151005-FMA-KiwiSaver-Report-2015.pdf

GENDER PAY GAP: The Human Rights Commission’s Tracking Equality at Work (TEW) reveals that women and young people are more likely to be paid less than any other New Zealand workers. Pacific women were at the bottom of the pay ladder.Find out more about Tracking Equality at Work https://www.hrc.co.nz/your-rights/employment-opportunities/our-work/tracking-equality-work/

MĀORI HOUSING NETWORK: The Māori Housing Network has been set up under Te Puni Kōkiri to support Māori-led housing initiatives and develop greater Māori capability in the sector. For more information go tohttp://www.tpk.govt.nz/en/whakamahia/maori-housing-network

MENTAL HEALTH: The theme of this year’s mental health awareness week (5-11 October) is ‘Give – Give your time, your words and your presence’. For more information on this year’s theme ‘Give’, one of the five ways to wellbeing, and what people can do to support others, visit the Mental Health Foundation’s awareness week website:http://www.mhaw.nz

MPI FOOD WARNING: The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) is extending its food safety warning on imported coconut milk products and coconut milk powder to include new products. Find out more: Food Smart website –http://www.foodsmart.govt.nz/elibrary/consumer/recall-imported-coconut-milk-drinks.htm

NATIONAL SCIENCE STRATEGY: Science and Innovation Minister Steven Joyce has today launched the inaugural National Statement of Science Investment (NSSI), which sets the long-term strategic direction for the Government’s investment in science. Read more: http://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/first-national-science-strategy-launched andhttp://www.mbie.govt.nz/info-services/science-innovation/national-statement-science-investment

RENEWABLE ENERGY: The International Energy Agency is forecasting a rise in the use of renewable electricity in the next 5 years. It says 26 percent of all electricity worldwide will be from wind, solar, hydro and geothermal sources by 2020. More details at: https://www.iea.org/newsroomandevents/pressreleases/2015/october/renewables-to-lead-world-power-market-growth-to-2020.html

TE REO MĀORI SCHOLARSHIPS: Known as the Te Taura Whiri i te Reo Māori and Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga – ‘Kia Ita’ Scholarship, five awards will be available to post graduate Masters students to help support research capacity and capability for te reo Māori. Read more:http://www. maramatanga.ac.nz/npm-grants

TOURISM INDUSTRY AWARDS: The Air New Zealand Supreme Tourism Industry Awards,managed by the Tourism Industry Association New Zealand (TIA) with Award Partners Air New Zealand and the Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment, the awards were announced over the weekend. For more information go tohttp://www.tourismawards.co.nz

WORLD BANK: The World Bank says extreme poverty will fall this year to less than 10 percent of the global population for the first time. According to the bank’s projections, about 702 million people, or 9.6 percent of the world population, will live below the poverty line this year, mostly in Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. Read more:http://www.worldbank.org/en/research/brief/policy-research-note-03-ending-extreme-poverty-and-sharing-prosperity-progress-and-policies

And that’s our sampling of “news you can use” for Monday 5th October.

Brought to EveningReport by Newsroom Digest. –]]>

Jane Kelsey: TPPA ministerial extended another day, still stuck on meds and dairy

]]>

Professor Jane Kelsey. Professor Jane Kelsey.[/caption]

Trade ministers desperate to conclude a  Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) at their meeting in Atlanta have extended the conclusion of their talks for another day, according to Professor Jane Kelsey who is in monitoring the negotiations.

Time is running out. They have one more day before the major players from the US, Japan, Canada, Mexico and Australia leave for the G-20 ministerial meeting in Istanbul that starts on Monday.

According to Professor Kelsey, the sticking points are still the pharmaceutical industry’s monopoly over biologics medicines and market access for dairy. The autos issue seems to have subsided.

On biologics, the US and Australia have worked overnight to find words that would allow countries to provide 5 rather than 8 years monopoly protection. The US was originally demanding 12 years. Even the compromise being sought would have major impacts on five countries that currently do not cover biologics in their domestic laws.

NOTE: US and Australian negotiators have been seeking a compromise over the wording on biologics but have not formally agreed on such wording. Nor has any wording been put to the other 10 parties to the TPP negotiations.

But Professor Kelsey warns that a ‘final’ TPPA that assumes any compromise wording would survive the US political process could be built on sand, as the US could still demand a longer term as a quid pro quo for making concessions on other areas.

Allowing countries to keep their current 5 years would have to pass the scrutiny of the US Congress and, more significantly, the process whereby the US certifies the other country has complied with the US understanding of its obligations under agreement. Professor Kelsey observed that ‘any flexibility given to New Zealand on biologics to allow us to keep our current 5 years of data exclusivity could prove an illusion at that final hurdle.’ 

As for dairy, the chess game remains much the same: what Canada and Japan have given the US is not enough to satisfy the US industry that it can compensate for increased market access to New Zealand.

]]>

Keith Rankin on Australia’s Ireland

]]>

Analysis by Keith Rankin. This article was also published on TheDailyBlog.co.nz.

Australians who happened to be born in New Zealand are being rounded up, locked up in hard-core detention facilities, and marooned. What’s this about? What exactly is New Zealand’s relationship with Australia?

In short, New Zealand is Australia’s Ireland. Further, in British eyes, it always was.

Some history. New Zealand was called ‘New Zealand’ because of its discovery by Europeans in 1642 by employees of the Dutch East India Company (VOC); their captain was Abel Tasman. Australia had likewise been ‘discovered’ 36 years earlier, and had been named New Holland. There was a nice symmetry about this; most directors of the VOC were from Holland, with the remainder being from Zeeland. These were the early years of the Dutch United Provinces, one of Europe’s first ever republics.

In 1770 James Cook ‘discovered’ New Holland’s eastern coast. Initially named ‘New Wales’ by Cook, for reasons unknown this was revised to New South Wales. Before 1836, British-settled eastern Australia was generally known as New South Wales, and the remainder of Australia as New Holland. Then the colony of South Australia (never part of NSW) was proclaimed. New South Wales reached its greatest extent in the year 1840, when it incorporated New Zealand. In the 1850s, Victoria and Queensland broke away from New South Wales.

From Britain’s perspective, New Zealand as part of New South Wales was only a temporary expedient. Rather, the British thought of New Zealand as New Ireland, with Ireland being beyond Wales rather than of Wales; over a saline ‘ditch’. Unfortunately for the British there was already a New Ireland (in what is now known as the ‘Bismarck Archipelago’, and named in 1767 by a British sea-captain, Philip Carteret). Never mind, the British simply called our triple crown ‘New Ulster’, ‘New Munster’ and ‘New Leinster’; the ‘New Ireland’ was implicit. In the 1846 constitution some token realism took place. Stewart Island did not really compare with Greater Dublin. And Wellington was more connected with Nelson and Christchurch than with Auckland. So New Zealand was re-divided by the British into two New Irish provinces; New Ulster north of the Patea River mouth, New Munster south of that line.

The United Kingdom was formed as a union of England/Wales, Scotland and Ireland in 1801. The Union Jack is a blend of the crosses of St George (England), St Andrew (Scotland) and St Patrick (Ireland). Ireland was very much the subservient part of the Union, and was treated with much contempt by the English in particular, who saw the civilised world as being across the Channel to its southeast, not across its ditch to the northwest. Although much of industrial Britain was constructed with Irish labour, the Irish were always second-class citizens – really denizens – to English eyes.

Unlike the Irish, New Zealanders fortuitously averted their neighbour’s yoke after only 14 months of attachment, in 1841. The ‘troubles’ that occurred persistently between the Irish ‘home rulers’ and the English-dominated Westminster government were legendary, and will enter their penultimate phase soon if Britain votes to leave the European Union. (The final phase will be the resolution of the Northern Irish question in a post EU United Kingdom; or a post-EU England. Maybe Northern Ireland will be separated by a Hungarian-style fence erected by the Irish to close Ireland’s EU back door to England’s millions of resident denizens?)

New Zealand averted a second opportunity for Irish-style ‘troubles’ by not joining the Commonwealth of Australia in 1901. For 100 years, while Australia looked the other way (to its far northwest in the main, but also, from the 1950s, to its far northeast across the Pacific), we pretended to be a rivalrous sibling; equal though smaller. Australia, not able to govern us, simply ignored us. To Britain, New Zealand was literally eclipsed by Australia. To Britons, New Zealand exists ‘as if’ it was an Australian state. We reinforce this particularly English perception, by appearing through our symbols to be something like New Anglesey. To the British, Auckland since the 1950s has become the Holyhead rather than the Dublin of the south.

To Australia New Zealand became its Ireland in the late 1980s. (Or was it March 1946 when Australia played New Zealand at test cricket and contemptuously refused to play New Zealand again until 1974?) That was when gross national income (GNI, formerly GNP) per person in New Zealand fell by about 20% against that in Australia. Prior to that the two countries’ per capita incomes were close enough to the same. The legacy of Rogernomics, however, was to make the Tasman Sea crossing close to one-way traffic in labour; with a small offsetting flow of junior managers in Australia doing time in New Zealand to build their careers.

By 2001, New Zealand’s stereotyped role as Bondi crims and dole bludgers was well established. Air New Zealand bought the dying Ansett Airlines (because the Australian government had reneged on CER provisions to allow Air NZ to fly within Australia), and imported Australian managers. It was not clear who took over whom. When Ansett and its New Zealand parent became insolvent in September 2001, many Australians thought it was all New Zealand’s fault. The New Zealand Airforce had to rescue Helen Clark from Australia when her flight was picketed. “The Kiwi bashing generally has become very vicious,” Clark said. Earlier that year, Australia unilaterally disqualified New Zealand-born residents from rights to tertiary education support, and disqualified New Zealand-born participants in the ‘reserve army of labour’ from rights to unemployment benefits.

New Zealanders came to live and work in Australia as denizens, not as Anzacs; and were looked upon generically as the English looked upon the Irish. While I like Australia, and I like the Australians who know me, I also understand that Australia has become as much ‘another country’ as any other ‘other country’.

We are now seeing the full playing-out of this new ‘guest worker’ relationship. New Zealand-born Australians have become substantial victims of a process within Australia in which a clear divide is growing between denizen workers and citizens. The Saudi-isation of Australia.

New Zealand has to accept that it is not a much-loved bastard sibling of the former Australian colonies. Rather New Zealand is just another foreign nation dealing with an essentially xenophobic neighbour. We need to get used to this. It’s part of our journey towards actual independence within a world of Wilsonian nation states. (This ‘sovereign nation’ system may not be the best system of geopolitical organisation, but it’s nevertheless the system that became firmly entrenched last century, and is therefore what we accept as reality.)

New Zealand has to separate from its past attachments. Ireland has largely separated from its British attachments; generally for the better, despite the Eurozone crisis. While Britain may not be as ruthless today in deporting unwanted Irish-born Britons as Australia is at deporting unwanted New Zealand-born Australians, we accept that Australia sets its rules, and New Zealand should continue making other friends while learning to live with its neighbourhood bully. Australia is that bully, not Australians.

Ireland is a cool and welcoming place, even to the English; ‘New Ireland’ is cool and welcoming too, even to Australians.

]]>

Jane Kelsey: Groser’s ‘ugly compromise’ in TPPA could cost New Zealanders’ lives

]]>

Professor Jane Kelsey. Professor Jane Kelsey.[/caption]‘We are told they may be close to reaching a final deal on the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) in Atlanta, and longer monopolies for Big Pharma over biologic medicines is the final sticking point’, according to Professor Jane Kelsey, who is in touch with people on the ground in Atlanta. The US is insisting on eight years total monopoly protection. Several countries are holding firm. But there are real fears New Zealand could cave. [caption id="attachment_7208" align="alignright" width="150"]Trade Minister Tim Groser. Trade Minister Tim Groser.[/caption]Trade Minister Groser is quoted in this morning’s Herald as saying every country will have to swallow multiple dead rats to finalise the deal in an ‘ugly compromise’. ‘In New Zealand’s case, the dead rat seems to be a dairy for medicines deal’, said Professor Kelsey. ‘If this happens, we can expect the Minister to hail the “net benefits” of the TPPA to New Zealand, playing up supposed gains to dairy exports that remain to be seen, and playing down New Zealand’s agreement to longer monopoly protection for biologics.’ ‘But the stark reality is that any such deal to close the TPPA would cost New Zealander’s lives.’ Health economists calculate that every added year of protection for biologics would cost New Zealand many tens of millions of dollars in current spending, and much more in the future as more biologics come on stream. ‘Future New Zealand governments would have to stump up hundreds of millions of dollars more to Pharmac. Yet this year the National government refused to fund even the modest budget increase Pharmac sought to meet rising costs.’ ‘Cancer sufferers in Atlanta described the biologics provision as a “death sentence clause”. Do Prime Minister Key and Minister Groser want that recorded as their legacy?’ –]]>

The effect of public funding on research output: the New Zealand Marsden Fund

]]>

NewsroomPlus.com Contributed by Motu New Zealand spends less money on research, relative to its size, than three-quarters of the countries in the OECD. The government is considering expanding public funding to narrow this gap, but very little is known about the efficacy of existing funding mechanisms. Motu recently released a statistical analysis of the effect of public funding given to business firms for R&D. In this paper, we examine the effectiveness of public funding of basic scientific research. The Marsden Fund is the premiere funding mechanism for blue skies research in New Zealand. In 2014, $56 million was awarded to 101 research projects chosen from among 1222 applications from researchers at universities, Crown Research Institutes and independent research organizations. This funding mechanism is similar to those in other countries, such as the European Research Council. This research measures the effect of funding receipt from the New Zealand Marsden Fund using a unique dataset of funded and unfunded proposals that includes the evaluation scores assigned to all proposals. This allows us to control statistically for potential bias driven by the Fund’s efforts to fund projects that are expected to be successful, and also to measure the efficacy of the selection process itself. We find that Marsden Funding does increase the scientific output of the funded researchers, but that there is no evidence that the final selection process is able to meaningfully predict the likely success of different proposals. Background to the Marsden Fund The Marsden Fund is funded by the Government, with selection and administration delegated to the Royal Society of New Zealand. Proposal review is carried out by assessment panels of between five and ten members that cover broad areas such as ‘Physical Sciences and Engineering’ and ‘Biomedical Sciences’. There are two types of Marsden Fund grant: • Standard – runs for up to three years with a maximum budget of $300,000 per year. • Fast Start – Applicants within 7 years of their PhD award can apply, limited to $100,000 per year. The application process has two stages. Each initial one-page proposal is reviewed by a subset of the appropriate panel and given a preliminary score. At this point, panels reject 71-84% of the proposals. In the second stage, longer proposals are submitted and sent to external (typically international) anonymous referees for review. Applicants are given the chance to respond to referee comments before the panel scores and ranks the proposals. METHODOLOGY – TEAM SUCCESS This analysis is based on 1,263 Marsden proposals from the second round reviews between 2003 and 2008. Overall 41% of the second-round proposals were funded. Around 25% of the proposals were FS and slightly more than half of these were funded. The average researcher on these teams made six proposals and received 1.2 grants between 2000 and 2012. Figure 1: Researcher interaction with the Marsden Fund, 2000-2012, New Zealand-based researchers who submitted at least one full proposal, 2003-2008 0We identified all the publications and all citations received by those publications from 1995 to 2012, for all of the named researchers on both the successful and unsuccessful proposals. We did not attempt to identify specific publications tied to the research funded, so our results should be interpreted as the overall effect of the Fund on researchers’ scientific output. Results – Team Success Our analysis looks at the effect of receiving funding on subsequent scientific output, after controlling for what would be predicted by the researchers’ previous record. In other words, we compare the output trajectory of funded researchers to that of unfunded researchers, and look for an acceleration upon receipt of funding. The statistical model also includes the quality ranking assigned to the proposal by the Marsden Panel. This controls for “selection bias” that might otherwise make us think that the funding is effective simply because the funded proposals were inherently likely to result in more output whether they received funding or not. Depending on the exact statistical model employed, we find that Marsden funding is associated with an increase of 6-15% in publications and 22-26% in citations, relative to what would have been predicted based on the researchers’ previous performance. The larger effect for citations implies that funding increases both the number of papers published and the average impact or significance of those publications. FS teams are associated with around 16% greater research output, consistent with these younger investigators being on a steeper upward output trajectory than other researchers. Since overall winning Fast-Start proposals are given about one-third as much money as winning standard proposals, the results suggest that they get a bigger boost per budget dollar. A researcher’s participation in a Marsden proposal can range between zero FTE and full-time. However, we cannot distinguish differential impact of funding based on the different funding levels of the team members. (Zero FTE researchers are often overseas researchers whose true role in the research is unclear; excluding these researchers does not materially affect the results.) We attempted to look at each disciplinary pool seperately, but unfortunately at that point the sample sizes are too small to yield statistically meaningful results. While we included the panel evaluation rank to control for selection bias, we found that a good ranking is not associated with better subsequent performance. In fact, after controlling for previous performance, the ranking is negatively associated with success. It is as if the panel rankings place so much weight on “track record” that they actually over-estimate the likely future performance of those researchers with strong past performance. Methodology – Individual Success As an alternative window on this process, we identified the approximately 1500 New Zealand based researchers named on these proposals and examined their annual publication and citation record between 1996-2012. Not surprisingly, many of these researchers participated in multiple proposals over that period and some of them received multiple grants: • 90% of these researchers submitted two or more preliminary proposals, • 60% submitted two or more full proposals, and • 30% received two or more contracts from 2000-2012. In our regression analysis of these data, we examine the extent to which the publications (and citations to those publications) produced in a given year are affected by the number of Marsden grants received in the previous five years. We restrict observations to those individuals who submitted at least one second round proposal in the preceding five years. The analysis is for the period 2004-2012. Results – Individual success The impact of receiving a funded contract is estimated as an approximate 3-5% increase in publications and a 5-8% increase in annual citations for each of the subsequent five years, relative to what otherwise would have occurred. Not publishing in the previous five years greatly increases the probability of not publishing in a given year and the stronger a researcher’s average performance over the past five years, the less likely they will be unpublished in a given year. As above, we find that a second stage ‘Fast-Start’ applicant, irrespective of funding, is on a steeper publication growth trajectory than ‘Standard’ applicants but the incremental effect of receiving ‘Fast-Start’ funding over ‘Standard’ funding is statistically zero. 0Conclusion Overall, we find that funding is associated with a significant increase in researchers’ scientific output and the apparent impact of that output as measured by subsequent citation. Because the true connection of any single researcher to a Marsden proposal on which they are listed is uncertain, we believe that the project team results of a 6-12% increase in publications and a 13-30% increase in citation-weighted papers is likely the best summary measure of the programme effect. It is important to emphasize that what is captured here is a general impact on the publication/citation success of the researchers. It seems likely that Marsden funding shifts researchers’ focus to some extent towards the subject of the grant, so that the funding impact on research outputs directly related to the proposal would likely be greater than those estimated here, but our empirical framework does not allow us to measure that. We also cannot determine the extent to which the increase comes from direct use of the Marsden money versus indirect impact of Marsden success on researcher opportunities and resources. While our initial intention was to include panel rank in the analysis to control for selectivity bias, we find no robust evidence of selection based on likely research success in the Marsden second round. We have tested many different versions of how that selection might operate, including trying both panel scores and raw referee scores, testing for an effect with or without conditioning on prior performance, and testing for a variety of non-linearities in the selection effect. There really seems to be nothing there. Given the significant researcher and RSNZ time and resources that are devoted to second-round selection, this suggests a potentially large misallocation of resources. Publications and citations are, of course, only proxies for research output. However, we find it hard to describe a plausible conception of the programme’s goals that, if successful, would not produce research that would be expected to be highly cited. While the study should be interpreted with these caveats, it results are suggestive of three important policy implications: • The public expenditure on the Marsden Fund is effective in increasing scientific outputs. • The fact that panel rankings are not predictive of subsequent success implies that if the unfunded projects could have been funded, the benefit of that funding would have been as great as it was for the projects actually funded. This means there is no reason to expect diminishing returns if Marsden funding were increased. • The significant resources devoted to the second round evaluation could be reduced without degrading the quality of selection decisionmaking. More generally, our analysis demonstrates the benefit of retaining and utilizing information on both successful and unsuccessful grant proposals. This basic strategy for identifying the treatment effect in the presence of potential selection bias is powerful in concept but very rarely applied in practice. –]]>

Dr Roslyn Kemp recognised for mentoring females in science with Miriam Dell Award

NewsroomPlus.com Contributed by AWIS Dr Roslyn Kemp from the University of Otago has been named this year’s winner of the Association for Women in the Sciences (AWIS) Miriam Dell Award, for her work inspiring female immunologists across Australasia. Roslyn, a senior lecturer in the University’s Department of Microbiology and Immunology, was recognised with the Award for her work with students and for instigating the Women’s Initiative of the Australasian Society for Immunology. A major component of the Initiative is to provide mentorship opportunities for female immunologists at all stages of their career, coordinated and managed by Roslyn. Since its introduction in December 2013, more than 85 mentors have been added to the programme, and more than 25 mentoring relationships established. RosKemp creditSharronBennett“Roslyn has an outstanding ability to inspire female students at graduate and postgraduate level,” says Dr Joanna Kirman, who nominated her for the Award. “As an undergraduate teacher she is exceptional, and this has contributed to a dramatic increase in the number of female students in Immunology in recent years. She has an inclusive and unselfish approach to mentoring, with a special emphasis on supporting young female Maori students into postgraduate study. Roslyn is a consistently strong and enthusiastic mentor for women in science, and I believe she has made a significant, tangible difference to many careers.” Dr Alec Mackay, a scientist at AgResearch in Palmerston North, has also been Highly Commended by the Judges of the Award, for his mentoring of female scientists at all stages of their careers. The Judges were particularly impressed with his work mentoring of female post-graduate students as well as students at Palmerston North Girls’ High School, where he has worked with teams of students undertaking the Royal Society’s CREST programme. “Alec is generous with his time in providing guidance to his mentees on developing leadership and communication skills, both of which contribute greatly to their development as engaged, relevant and influential scientists,” says Fleur Maseyk, a PhD student at the University of Queensland supervised by Alec. “Alec’s mentorship inspires those who work with him to realise their full potential as scientists, to be the drivers of science that makes a difference, to explore creative avenues for communicating their science, and to become influential and innovative in their field.” The Judging Panel received fourteen nominations for the Award including scientists at universities and Crown Research Institutes from across New Zealand. “The Judging Panel were very impressed with the calibre of nominations and it is wonderful to see so many scientists inspiring young females into the field,” says Emma Timewell, National Convenor of AWIS. “Roslyn and Alec demonstrated mentorship that went beyond that expected in their roles as managers and supervisors of students, finding additional ways to support females with an interest in science. We’re very pleased to be able to recognise both of them for their inspiration and support of women in science.” The Miriam Dell Award for Excellence in Science Mentoring was introduced in 2013 and is awarded on a biennial basis to someone who demonstrates outstanding mentoring efforts to retain females in science, mathematics or technology. Nominees can be from any part of the science system – including teachers at primary or secondary schools, lecturers or supervisors in tertiary education, or from commercial science-based organisations. They may have mentored, formally or informally, females at any stage in their career – from school age to the science workforce. The Award is named for Dame Miriam Dell, Patron of AWIS, botanist, secondary school teacher and advocate for women’s advancement. The first recipient of the Award, in 2013, was Dr Judith O’Brien of the University of Auckland. –]]>

New Zealand Report: Justin Bieber Gives Endorsement For Current Flag

New Zealand Report: Selwyn Manning delivers his New Zealand Report to Australia’s radio FiveAA.com.au breakfast team. This week: Justin Bieber Gives Endorsement For Current Flag – Recorded live on 2/10/15.

U.S. performer Justin Bieber is in Auckland and during a radio interview urged Kiwis not to change our flag. In November New Zealanders get to vote in a referendum on whether the old southern cross and Union Jack flag should be ditched and replaced with one of five new designs. After checking out the options, Bieber said: “Are you guys not confident in your flag? It looks fine to me.” And in a gesture perhaps to reinforce his sincerity, and before heading off to go bungy jumping and skydiving, a fairly friendly Justin Bieber handed over a signed pair of underpants. Apparently the Calvin Klein briefs will be given away via the radio station’s Facebook page today. Goodness has been restored to the world.

New Zealand Report broadcasts live weekly on Australia’s FiveAA.com.au and webcasts on EveningReport.nz LiveNews.co.nz and ForeignAffairs.co.nz.

–]]>

NewsRoom Digest: Top NZ News Items for October 1, 2015

]]>

Newsroom Digest

This edition of NewsRoom_Digest features 12 resourceful links of the day and the politics pulse from Thursday 1st October.

NEWSROOM_MONITOR

Top stories in the current news cycle include New Zealand facing its lowest level of housing availability in nearly a decade as demand continues to outstrip supply,the Department of Internal Affairs looking into the case of a preschooler facing deportation from Australia because his mother has been unable to pass on her New Zealand citizenship to him and the release of an inquiry findings on how the convicted murderer and sex offender Phillip John Smith fled to Brazil while on temporary release from prison.

Note: As well as providing a precis of leading broadcast bulletins each day, our NewsRoom_Monitor service does a daily paper round with succinct ‘news picks’ from the main metropolitan papers emailed by 9am each morning. If you’re interested in a free trial please email monitor@newsroom.co.nz

POLITICS PULSE

Media releases issued from Parliament by political parties today included:

Government: Labour claims over iwi consultation on Kermadec sanctuary weak; Minister welcomes more ethnic diversity; Another 940 in Trades Academies from 2016;Proposed $450m levy reductions signal ACC in great shape; Smith / Traynor Inquiry report released; Govt response to Smith/Traynor review; Appointment to New Zealand Film Commission Board; Gains on property sales targeted from today; Fran Wilde appointed to Te Papa board

Greens: NZ must look to balance rights for Kiwis in Australia; Government’s hunt for oil is a dying dream

Labour: Labour claims over iwi consultation on Kermadec sanctuary weak; Bright line test already set to flat line; Serco’s other detention centre of shame; Despite the spin our universities slide; hain of failures leads to paedophile’s escape

New Zealand First: ‘Fonterra’s Five Million Dollar Man’ not delivering; Memory Fade Hinders Minister Of Senior Citizens

LINKS OF THE DAY

Links of the day have been a feature of NewsRoom_Digest since we first started production in August 2014 at newsroom-nz.tumblr.com. We are currently building an archive of these at:http://newsroomplus.com/resources/resourceful-links/

16TH MOST COMPETITIVE NATION: New Zealand is the 16th most competitive country in the world, according to this year’s Global Competitiveness Index.Full survey results for 2015 can be seen athttp://www.weforum.org/issues/global-competitiveness

DAIRYNZ AGM: Results of the DairyNZ director elections will be announced at the AGM and the board and senior management will report to farmers on the organisation’s financial results and investment priorities.Read more:http://www.dairynz.co.nz/elections

DELOITTE WINNERS: The regional category winners of the 2015 Deloitte Fast 50 were announced at events held around the country.For more on the 2015 regional category winners, go to http://www.fast50.co.nz.

FOOD SAFETY RULES: The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) is calling for input from food businesses and providers into new food safety rules. Go here : http://www.mpi.govt.nz

GLOBAL DIGITAL IQ SURVEY: PwC’s 2015 Digital IQTM Survey links 10 key company actions directly to stronger financial performance.Go here for the PwC survey: http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/services/advisory/2015-global-digital-iq-survey/downloads.html

HAYS GLOBAL SKILLS INDEX: New Zealand has been given the highest score possible – 10.0 – for wage pressure in our high-skill industries in a global assessment of the efficiency of skilled labour markets in 31 countries. Go here for the Hays Global Skills Index 2015: http://www.hays-index.com/

HOME VALUES RISE: The latest monthly QV House Price Index shows that nationwide residential property values for September have increased 12.6% over the past year which is the fastest rate since October 2007. The full set of QV House Price Index statistics for all New Zealand for September can be downloaded by clicking this link:https://www.qv.co.nz/resources/news/article?blogId=205

LEVY REDUCTIONS: The ACC Board is proposing levy reductions worth $450 million in 2016/17, spread across work, earners’ and motor vehicle levies. See ACC’s levy consultation at: http:www.shapeyouracc.co.nz

MOVEMBER 2015 REGISTRATIONS OPEN: Each November, the Movember Foundation gives men a ‘free pass’ to grow a Mo, and with the month of moustachery just weeks away, Kiwi blokes are being called upon to prep their upper lips. To register to participate in Movember, visit: https://www.nz.movember.com/?home

NZ RANKED 4TH IN THE WORLD: The high quality of New Zealand’s universities has been confirmed in the annual Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings released today. The full list of the top 200 is available athttp://www.thewur.com

SAFE CHALLENGE: Save Animals from Exploitation is urging the public to take the 30-day Go Veg challenge athttp://www.goveg.org.nz. SAFE is offering help and support with delicious recipes, helpful tips and lots of information on how to live a healthy and compassionate life.

WARNING ON COCONUT MILK PRODUCTS: The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) is extending its food safety warning on imported coconut milk products to include an instant coconut milk powder product and a coconut juice product. MPI’s Chief Executive statement issued under the Food Act 2014 can be accessed at:http://mpigovtnz.cwp.govt.nz/news-and-resources/media-releases/food-safety-warning-extended-to-include-two-further-coconut-milk-products/

And that’s our sampling of “news you can use” for Thursday 1st October.

Brought to EveningReport by Newsroom Digest. –]]>

Jane Kelsey Says Helen Clark needs to heed her own UN advisers on TPPA

]]>

‘In standing beside National Prime Minister John Key and appearing to endorse the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) Helen Clark has forgotten the most vulnerable New Zealanders who will bear the brunt of the government’s concessions to US demands, especially on medicines, and the rights of New Zealanders to decide our own future’, says University of Auckland law professor and TPPA critic Jane Kelsey.

‘It also puts her at odds with her own Labour Party’s position that it won’t support a TPPA that undermines New Zealand’s sovereignty, which the Prime Minister has already admitted it will’.

‘Clark’s statement suggests she has become too far removed from the realities and opinions of ordinary New Zealanders’.

‘Helen Clark also needs to remember her responsibilities as the head of the United Nations Development Programme’, Kelsey observed.

‘There a mass of evidence that the poor and most vulnerable will lose from the TPPA, especially those who rely on affordable medicines – a view expressed by other UN agencies, such as the World Health Organisation, and UNAIDS.’[1]

Last month ten of the UN’s special rapporteurs wrote a public letter expressing wide-ranging concerns about the impacts of agreements like the TPPA on human rights, including rights to health, health, culture, food, indigenous people, and democracy, and calling for a human rights impact assessment before any negotiations are concluded.[2] 

Professor Kelsey urged Helen Clark to heed the advice of the UN experts appointed to advise her.

[1]

http://www.unaids.org/en/resources/presscentre/pressreleaseandstatementarchive/2015/july/20150728_trips_plus

[2] http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=16031

]]>

Across The Ditch: Chris Brown + NZ PM’s Staunch Message to Australia + Rugby World Cup Update

Broadcast: Selwyn Manning and Peter Godfrey deliver their weekly bulletin Across The Ditch. This week they discuss: Should US performer Chris Brown be allowed a visa + NZ PM’s Staunch Message to Australia over Kiwi deportations + Rugby World Cup Update… Go Australia!

ITEM ONE: Should gangster rapper Chris Brown be permitted a visa? ITEM TWO New Zealand Prime Minister John Key will raise Australia’s deportation policy with Malcolm Turnbull when the two meet for their first Trans-Tasman leaders’ meeting. Both New Zealand’s foreign affairs minister and John Key spoke this week to Australia’s foreign minister Julie Bishop about the issue on the sidelines of the United Nations general assembly in New York. Late last week, it was revealed up to 80 New Zealanders had in recent months been deported by Australia to detention camps, including around 28 Kiwis last week alone who were flown to the detention facility on Christmas Island. Early this week news reports revealed how 200 New Zealanders had been detained or deported since new policies were established over one year ago. While New Zealanders and Australians have the right to travel or live in either country, the new rules in Australia mean any foreign national who has served more than one year in jail can be deported. The view here in New Zealand is that if Australia is going to deport a New Zealander, then they should be deported to New Zealand, not detained on the Australian continent, on Christmas Island, or anywhere else. This week, it was revealed that a New Zealander had allegedly killed himself while being detained in solitary confinement in an Australian detention centre – 23-year-old Junior Togatuki died in Goulburn Jail earlier this month awaiting deportation. From New York, John Key told Radio New Zealand that his message to Julie Bishop was blunt. Key message to Bishop suggested there is a “special relationship between New Zealand and Australia and you challenge that relationship to a degree when you see New Zealanders being treated … in this way.” He added: “There is an Anzac bond and an Anzac spirit … that surely means we might get some treatment that’s different from other countries.” After the meeting Julie Bishop told ABC news: “I discussed more generally with Prime Minister Key and with foreign minister Murray McCully whether there are other arrangements that Australia and New Zealanders could reach in relation to the deportation of New Zealanders,” she said. “There is no closer relationship than Australia and New Zealand, and so I think it’s appropriate that we consider this matter as Prime Minister Key has asked us to do.” ITEM THREE Rugby World Cup update, the form, the injuries, the big games looming…

Across The Ditch broadcasts live each Thursday on FiveAA.com.au and webcasts on EveningReport.nz LiveNews.co.nz ForeignAffairs.co.nz.

]]>

- ADVERT -

MIL PODCASTS
Bookmark
| Follow | Subscribe Listen on Apple Podcasts

Foreign policy + Intel + Security

Subscribe | Follow | Bookmark
and join Buchanan & Manning LIVE Thursdays @ midday

MIL Public Webcast Service


- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -