Page 1236

‘That day I saw the power of media, and how it can be tragic’

]]>

Report by David Robie. This article was first published on Café Pacific

University of Papua New Guinea’s Emily Matasororo … in the background, images of heavily armed police
shortly before they opened fire on peaceful students. Image:” Del Abcede/PMC

By DAVID ROBIE

SURPRISING that a conference involving some of the brightest minds in journalism education from around the world should be ignored by New Zealand’s local media.

Some 220 people from 43 countries were at the Fourth World Journalism Education Congress (WJEC) conference in Auckland.

The range of diversity alone at the Auckland University of Technology hosted event was appealing, but it was the heady mix of ideas and contributions that offered an inspiring backdrop.

Topics included strategies for teaching journalism for mobile platforms – the latest techniques; “de-westernising” journalism education in an era of new media genres; transmedia storytelling; teaching hospitals; twittering, facebooking and snapchat — digital media under the periscope; new views on distance learning, and 21st century ethical issues in journalism are just a representative sample of what was on offer.

Keynote speakers included Divina Frau-Meigs (Université Sorbonne Nouvelle) with a riveting account on how “powerful journalism” makes “prime ministers jump”, the Center of Public Integrity’s Peter Bale (a New Zealander) on the need to defend press freedom, and Tongan newspaper publisher and broadcaster who turned “inclusivity” on its head with an inspiring “include us” appeal from the Pacific,”where we live in the biggest continent on planet Earth”.

But for me, the most moving message of all came not from those who spoke about “reporting dangerously” (such as Simon Cottle) or the very future of journalism, but from a young quietly spoken Papua New Guinean woman who has “lived” through a freedom of speech and the press struggle while facing live bullets.

Emily Matasororo, leader of the Journalism Strand at the University of Papua New Guinea, was on campus that fateful day last month (June 8) when heavily armed PNG police in camouflage fatigues opened fire with tear gas and live rounds on the peaceful students. She was actually in the crowd fired on.

Emily’s testimony
Matasororo gave her testimony at a WJEC16 panel on journalism education in the Pacific chaired by me, with the presence of the panel members being sponsored by the NZ Institute of Pacific Research.

Explaining how the two months of student unrest began across Papua New Guinea’s six universities – but mostly centred on UPNG in the capital of Port Moresby, and the University of Technology in the second city Lae – she said it was an irony that protests were triggered on World Press Freedom Day (May 3).

“The Journalism Strand was preparing to celebrate freedom of the press that day. However, this did not eventuate because the academic space was taken up by a student forum.

“This was the beginning of an eight-week stand-off by the students who demanded that the Prime Minister, Peter O’Neill, step down from office and face police over allegations of fraud. However, the prime minister said: ‘I will not step down.’”

Matasororo said O’Neill had challenged the issue of an arrest warrant against him, saying this case was now before the courts. Under the Papua New Guinea Constitution, O’Neill could be removed by a no-confidence vote, or on criminal charges. But the former option was shut down this week when O’Neill survived a no-confidence vote by 85 to 21 votes.

Among other issues that spurred the students into organising class boycotts and protests was the O’Neill government’s actions in dismantling the police fraud squad [National Fraud and Anti-Corruption directorate] – the very office that would investigate the prime minister. But, as Matasororo pointed out, the squad was later reinstated.

Another O’Neill move was adjourning Parliament until November to stave off the possibility of the no-confidence vote. (A Supreme Court ruling forced the reconvening of Parliament and the vote).

Violating the Constitution
Students became convinced that Prime Minister O’Neill was acting in violation of the Constitution and they saw themselves as defending the rule of law on behalf of all Papua New Guineans.

Earlier in the protests students at UPNG had set on fire 800 copies of the two national dailies being sold at the Waigani campus front gates in frustration over what they perceived to be the news media taking sides and promoting the O’Neill government’s agenda.

“The burning was an indication that they disliked the papers’ coverage of events leading up the [first] protest. Why should the Student Representative Council go as far as preferring certain media outlets over others?” Matasororo asked the forum which was syndicated globally on livestream.

The Post-Courier, The National and television station EM TV were banned covering student activities on campus. The UPNG is a public and government-run institution and is a public space open to everyone, including the media. If students reacted that way, it brought up issues of credibility and integrity of the freedom of the press in Papua New Guinea.

“Which brings to light the question of ethics.”

Matasororo quoted from a Loop PNG report bylined Carmella Gware, who talked to a student leader in spite of the ban on local media:

The burning of newspapers at the University of
Papua New Guinea. Newspapers were also set on fire
at Unitech. Image: Asia Pacific Report
“We saw the newspapers and saw that the reports were very shallow and biased.

“They were not actual reports of what we students are portraying at the university. That’s why, to show our frustration, we went out to the bus stop and burnt those papers.

“What we displayed in the morning shows that we have no trust in the media,” the student leader stated (sic) said.

— Carmella Gware – Loop PNG

Investigation needed
“While I acknowledge and appreciate the tireless efforts of the media’s coverage of the student protests,’ said Matasororo, “for me this is a very strong statement that needs to be investigated.

“This needs to be done by all stakeholders concerned to promote fair and just reporting and the essence of good ethics and good journalism.

“The stakeholders must include, but not be limited to he following: the publisher and managements of the papers, the Media Council of PNG, Transparency International, Ombudsman Commission and the journalism educators of the UPNG and the Catholic-run Divine Word University.

“For the publishers, credibility is questioned; for the Media Council it is a threat against the profession; and for the educators – where are we going wrong in teaching ethics, are we giving enough prominence that it deserves?

“These are questions that need to be answered, in order to promote a robust and conducive environment in which journalists should operate in.”

On June 8, said Matasororo, the protests –until then peaceful – “took an ugly turn”. Several students were wounded, some news reports saying as many as 30. But there were no deaths.

“Social media was running hot with images and comments uploaded in real time. Some of what was coming from social media was emotional reporting.

“Information was distorted with some news stations reporting casualties.

“An Australian-based media outlet reported four deaths and isolated reports on radio, television and social media that day created a new level of fear, confusion and anxiety among residents.

“For me that day, I saw how powerful the media was, and when it is not applied correctly, it can be tragic.”

]]>

Keith Rankin’s Chart for this Month: Untaxation and Public Equity Benefits

]]>

Analysis by Keith Rankin.

The official New Zealand income tax scale has four ‘marginal’ tax-rates: 10.5 percent; 17.5 percent; 30 percent and 33 percent. That means there are four ‘marginal’ untax-rates: 89.5 percent; 82.5 percent; 70 percent and 67 percent. Income taxation is income that is pooled. Income untaxation is income that is kept. (It is the role of academics to look at simple truths in different ways, and to discern insights from those alternative vantage points.)

This month’s chart shows untaxation in New Zealand in 2016, in two different ways.

The first (more conventional, though less interesting) way is to contrast orange with green. The orange is income after tax; the green is tax.

To read the chart, if your annual salary is $60,000 then your marginal rate of untaxation is 70 cents in the dollar. You get to keep 70 cents of the last dollar you earned.

To calculate your total after-tax income (called ‘disposable income’), just calculate all that is orange to the left of the $60,000 line. It amounts to:

·         89.5% of $14,000 + 82.5% of $34,000 + 70% of $12,000 = $48,980

Thus a person earning $60,000 is not taxed $48,980. Apply the same procedure for any level of annual income. (If your income is more than $100,000, the chart simply extends infinitely to the right.)

The second and more interesting perspective is to treat all that has dark shading (orange and green) as a person’s contribution towards the public income-pool, and all that has pale shading (orange only) as a person’s privately-sourced income. To persevere with the above example, persons grossing $60,000 contribute 33 cents of their last (marginal) dollar earned to the public pool and keep 67 cents for themselves. (This would also be true for persons grossing any other amount of annual income.)

From this perspective, the dark orange represents the amount a person draws, as private income, back from the public pool. Thus, persons grossing $60,000 gain 3 cents of their marginal dollar back from the public pool. In total, 70 cents of their last dollar earned is available for private spending.

We can calculate a person’s total rebate from the public pool from the chart. It’s the dark orange area to the left of the person’s gross annual income. For someone grossing $60,000 it amounts to:

·         22.5% of $14,000 + 15.5% of $34,000 + 3% of $12,000 = $8,780

This is what I call this person’s Public Equity Benefit (PEB). It’s the personal benefit that they draw from being an adult participant of New Zealand Inc. To determine the maximum PEB, just use $70,000 as the example income. The maximum PEB (the entire dark orange area) is $9,080.

The equity problem we face is that, for people on higher incomes, their PEB is higher than is the PEB for people on lower incomes. Unlike Family Tax Credits (for example), the PEB is a benefit that gets bigger the bigger a person’s income. There is no equity principle that I know of that justifies people on higher incomes getting bigger public benefits than poorer people.

The first step of tax-benefit reform in New Zealand is to untax every tax-resident at 67 cents in the dollar, and to ensure that every tax-resident receives, in addition to their privately-sourced income, a benefit from the public income pool that is at least the present maximum Public Equity Benefit of $9,080 per year.

It is not hard for the government to do this. It’s a poverty of the imagination – not of the economy – that holds us back.

]]>

Across the Ditch: Auckland’s Growth Blueprint Released + Olympics Fever Rising

Across the Ditch: Australian radio FiveAA.com.au’s Peter Godfrey and EveningReport.nz’s Selwyn Manning deliver their weekly bulletin Across the Ditch. This week they discuss: Weather + News Roundup + Auckland’s growth plan released + Olympics fever. ITEM ONE: Auckland Growth Rule-Book Released Auckland Council has released its unitary plan, a blueprint document on how it will handle its growth over the next two decades. The City’s urban outer boundary will expand by 30 percent, And the already populated central areas will intensify with more multi story dwellings. The plan is described as the new rulebook that tells people what can be built and where. The plan is to assist sustaining rapid growth to provide 422,000 new dwellings over the next 30 years. That breaks down to 270,000 new dwellings within the existing boundary, and another 152,000 within current rural areas. 42.6% of single dwelling homes in Auckland’s central suburbs will be rezoned for intensification, including among them numerous leafy suburbs. Also, the Unitary Plan strips out some Treaty of Waitangi principles protecting land of cultural sensitivity. Auckland Councillors have only until August 19 2016 to ratify the plan. Click here for access to Auckland Council’s Unitary Plan. ITEM TWO: Some pre-Olympics excitement is building. A Kiwi rowing fours team has been training flat-out for the games, even though they are not sure if they will be able to compete. It all will be decided by Russian officials. With a swag of Russian rowers banned from competing, if the Russian officials decide not to replace them, then the Kiwi fours will be flying out for Rio the day before the games begin. What I really like about the Olympics is how people who have been training away without anyone really knowing they are world class, suddenly shine through and become Olympic champions. When that happens we realise were aren’t just a sporting nation of Rugby players and Cricketers. Latest news here: Olympic.org.nz/news Across the Ditch broadcasts live weekly on Australia’s FiveAA.com.au and webcasts on EveningReport.nz LiveNews.co.nz and ForeignAffairs.co.nz. ]]>