Page 64

NZ agencies have eye on ‘largest solar radiation storm in over 20 years’

Source: Radio New Zealand

Aurora lights up the sky in Mercer, Auckland on 11 May, 2024. Supplied / Laura Acket

A solar storm is being monitored by the National Emergency Management Agency and national power grid owners Transpower, but so far, it isn’t expected to cause disruption.

These events, also known as space weather, do not pose a physical threat to human health.

But with society increasingly dependent on technology, an otherwise harmless burst of radiation from the sun could easily disrupt business as usual, taking out the power grids and GPS.

New Zealand monitors alerts from the Unites States agency National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) regarding solar activity.

Early Tuesday morning, NOAA’s Space Weather Prediction Centre (SWPC) posted on X: “An S4 severe solar radiation storm is now in progress – this is the largest solar radiation storm in over 20 years. The last time S4 levels were observed was in October, 2003.

But, it noted: “Potential effects are mainly limited to space launch, aviation, and satellite operations.”

The National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) told RNZ the coronal mass ejection arrived in Aotearoa about 8.30am on Tuesday, “and it is not expected to cause significant impacts for NZ”.

The agency had activated its Space Weather Science Advisory Panel, which had considered international space weather monitoring and forecasting agencies, as well as current information from the NZ-based monitoring network.

“On current conditions, the panel advises this event is not concerning for NZ and no significant impacts are expected. NEMA and Transpower will continue to monitor the situation.”

A Transpower spokesperson told RNZ it was keeping an eye on the storm, but the threshold had not yet been met to make changes to the grid.

Large solar storms could send unwanted currents through the long electricity circuits which Transpower managed. When they reached transformers in stations or large hydroelectric dams, they could cause extensive damage. 

“We have been closely monitoring the solar storm since the coronal mass ejection lifted off the sun on Sunday,” the spokesperson said.

“It arrived at 8.40am this morning resulting in geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) in our electricity transmission network, but these are within limits where mitigation actions are not needed.”

There was a contingency plan in place to switch out circuits to mitigate effects if needed, but there would be no impact on consumer electricity supply even if this was necessary.

The threat of disruption caused by solar storms has become increasingly understood by local agencies, and a number of them have plans in place. Nema simulated a G5 event in the Beehive bunker in November last year.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Fletcher Building to sell construction arm to Vinci

Source: Radio New Zealand

Fletcher Building headquarters in Auckland. Fletcher Building

  • Fletcher Construction to be sold for $315.6m, potentially rising to $334.1m
  • Sale includes Higgins, Brian Perry Civil and Fletcher Construction Major Projects
  • The deal is subject to regulatory approvals.

Fletcher Building has reached a binding agreement to sell its construction division to major international firm Vinci Construction.

The initial sale price was $315.6 million, but could rise to just over $334m depending on the outcome of key contract negotiations.

The sale of Fletcher Construction Holdings included its New Zealand business units, Higgins, Brian Perry Civil and Fletcher Construction Major Projects.

“Over the past year, we have been clear that Fletcher Building’s future lies in being a focused building products manufacturer and distributor, supported by a strong balance sheet and disciplined capital allocation,” Fletcher Building chief executive Andrew Reding said.

“The sale of Fletcher Construction is a significant step forward in delivering that strategy, while continuing the work underway to simplify the portfolio, lower debt and improve shareholder returns,” he said.

Reding was confident the sale to Vinci would be the right transaction for shareholders, Fletcher Construction itself and the broader New Zealand construction industry.

“I believe Fletcher Construction will find a strong home with Vinci, whose strengths are well aligned with the business, and which has a proven track record of successfully delivering major infrastructure projects globally.”

The deal was subject to regulatory approvals, including from the Overseas Investment Office and the Commerce Commission.

Fletcher Building also expected to set aside $55-$65m for probable future claims relating to legacy construction contracts retained following the divestment.

However, it did not include any allowances for potential legal liability relating to the NZ International Convention Centre project.

The decision to sell Fletcher Construction followed a strategic review of the wider Fletcher Building business in 2025.

“Following our strategic review in 2025, we received strong inbound interest for the construction business,” Reding said.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Why Keir Starmer had to speak out against Trump over Greenland after staying quiet on Venezuela

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jason Ralph, Professor of International Relations, University of Leeds

The Labour government came into office promising to “use realist means to pursue progressive ends”. US president Donald Trump’s recent actions over Venezuela and Greenland have tested Keir Starmer’s ability to deliver on that promise.

When the prime minister said he had been “a lifelong advocate of international law” there was a reasonable expectation that he would condemn the US action in Venezuela. Some feared that his ambiguity on that issue was a betrayal of progressive values.

However, US action in Venezuela came at a sensitive moment in the UK’s efforts to achieve a progressive end to the war in Ukraine. US cooperation is vital if Russia is to be forced to negotiate a peace that respects the Ukrainian right to self-determination. That means persuading the US to put pressure on Russia – something that would be impossible if Starmer had alienated Trump by condemning his illegal action in Venezuela.

Starmer has shown that he is able to handle Trump’s unpredictable personality. His ambiguity on Venezuela immediately prior to the Paris meeting that agreed security guarantees for Ukraine can be interpreted in these terms. He knew that the progressive strategy on Ukraine was reliant on a delicate alignment of US power.

When it emerged that British forces had helped the US seize a Russian-flagged oil tanker linked to Venezuela the stakes were raised. Trump’s actions were certainly a grab for Venezuela’s oil but the consequences could work toward progressive ends if Russian investments in Venezuela’s oil industry are written off and Russia’s ability to avoid sanctions by operating a “shadow fleet” are weakened. For the progressive realist then, Starmer’s ambiguity on Trump’s illegal action in Venezuela could be a worthwhile, if regrettable, trade-off.

The word “regret” shouldn’t be lightly passed over. Progressive realists need not be “theological” in the application of international law, and Starmer knows that good legal prosecutors exercise political judgment. But there is a danger.

The risk of not properly condemning Trump on Venezuela was that it could set the world on a slippery slope. It could simply encourage Trump’s imperialist ambitions. That seems to have happened very quickly and Starmer’s speech on Greenland was designed to stop the slide.

Starmer reminded us that “Britain is a pragmatic country”. It will, in other words, compromise with the US to find solutions to problems like Russia. But as Starmer said, “being pragmatic does not mean being passive. And partnership does not mean abandoning principle”.

The principle at stake in Greenland is the same as Venezuela: national self-determination. So why is he drawing the line now?

Starmer’s press conference.

As a realist, Starmer has shown his willingness to compromise on Venezuela. He has listened to Trump’s concerns on Ukraine and has made the case for greater defence spending across Europe. But as a progressive he has also shown there is a limit to how far he can compromise with the US, and he has drawn a line on Greenland.

This is because the argument that the US needs to annex Greenland to pressure Russia makes no sense. Greenland is already part of an anti-Russian alliance: Nato. No positive outcome can emerge from US pressure on Greenland.

European governments made that clear in Paris and Starmer’s speech reinforced the point. The pettiness of Trump’s statement linking the Greenland issue to Norway’s decision not to grant him the Nobel prize adds to the sense that US policy is now based on the personal ambitions of an imperial president. Against this backdrop, progressive realism means no longer compromising with the US.

A breach of trust

Another principle at stake in Greenland is multilateral cooperation based on respect. International relations academics have longed called the transatlantic region a “security community” because it goes beyond transactional deals. It is based on trust that comes from a sense of “we-ness”. Starmer is trying to maintain that community by speaking over Trump and appealing to the narrative of transatlantic solidarity that existed through the second world war, the cold war and the war on terror.

The question, though, is whether that narrative still has power in the US. Trump is intent on putting “America first” and is not concerned about niceties like respect, trust and gratitude. It might seem hard to imagine that the rest of his country will follow him, but recall that America’s founding father, Alexander Hamilton, famously dismissed Thomas Jefferson’s argument that the US owed France a debt of gratitude for its support during the revolutionary wars. When it came to matters of war and peace, Hamilton argued, former allies were on their own.

The UK has aligned itself with the US for decades because it shared values and could leverage US power in the service of its moral as well as material interests. If the Trump administration and the wider Maga movement in Congress continues to undermine the transatlantic security community, and international society more generally, then this relationship may no longer serve Britain’s interests. Progressive realism may have justified strategic ambiguity on Venezuela, but the opposite now appears to be true when it comes to US imperialism towards Greenland.

The Conversation

Jason Ralph has previously received funding from Research Councils UK and the European Union. He is a member of the UK Labour Party.

Jamie Gaskarth is affiliated with Associate Fellow, Chatham House.

ref. Why Keir Starmer had to speak out against Trump over Greenland after staying quiet on Venezuela – https://theconversation.com/why-keir-starmer-had-to-speak-out-against-trump-over-greenland-after-staying-quiet-on-venezuela-273836

How George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four predicted the global power shifts happening now

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Emrah Atasoy, Associate Fellow of English and Comparative Literary Studies & Honorary Research Fellow of IAS, the University of Warwick and Upcoming IASH Postdoctoral Research Fellow, the University of Edinburgh, University of Warwick

Orwell’s dystopian masterpiece envisaged a world dominated by three rival blocs that are constantly at war with one another. U.J. Alexander/Shutterstock

There’s nothing new about calling George Orwell’s most influential novel prescient. But the focus has usually been on his portrayal of the oppressive aspects of life in Oceania, the superstate in which Nineteen Eighty-Four is set.

Today, however, a different feature – which as recently as 2019, some critics dismissed as “obsolete” – is getting more attention: its vision of a world divided into three spheres, controlled by autocratic governments that constantly form and then break alliances.

In 2022, Vladimir Putin initiated Russia’s full-on invasion of Ukraine. This year began with the US mounting a raid on Venezuela and snatching its president, while Donald Trump speculated about US actions against various other countries in Latin America and Greenland. Meanwhile, Xi Jinping regularly repeats China’s intention to “reunify” with Taiwan – by force if necessary.

“Orwell-as-prophet” commentators began showing more interest in the superstate idea early in the decade, often leading with references to Putin’s imperial ambitions. This trend became more pronounced when Trump’s second term began.

Last year, American historian Alfred McCoy led with a tripolar reference in his Foreign Policy essay: “Is 2025 the New 1984?” A Bloomberg report on the Trump-Putin summit in Alaska last August was headlined: “It Looks Like a Trump-Putin-Xi World, But It’s Really Orwell’s”. The article described Nineteen Eighty-Four’s fictional model of global affairs as “prophetic”.

Many observers now see Big Brother-like leaders wielding power in Washington, as well as in Moscow and Beijing. In her first essay of 2026, Anne Applebaum wrote in The Atlantic that: “Orwell’s world is fiction, but some want it to become reality.”

The American journalist and historian noted a dangerous desire of some for “an Asia dominated by China, a Europe dominated by Russia, and a Western Hemisphere dominated by the United States”. Social media is awash with comments and maps in the same vein.

Orwell’s influences

Analysts have claimed that elements of Orwell’s portrayal of politics inside Oceania paralleled various parts of dystopian novels written before Nineteen Eighty-Four. They cite, in particular, the potential influence of Jack London’s The Iron Heel (1908) and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World (1932) – works Orwell discussed in a 1940 essay.

Then there’s Yevgeny Zamyatin’s novel We (1921), which Orwell wrote about in 1946, and Arthur Koestler’s Darkness at Noon (1940), which he wrote about in 1941. Both inspired him with their criticism of the real Soviet Union.

Could these or other utopian and dystopian texts – such as Ayn Rand’s Anthem (1938), Sinclair Lewis’s It Can’t Happen Here (1935), and Noël Coward’s play Peace in Our Time (1946) – have given him ideas about future geopolitics?

In fact, most of the works mentioned downplay or ignore international issues. Koestler focuses on one unnamed totalitarian country, Zamyatin and Huxley on a single world-state, London and Lewis on an America transformed by a domestic tyrannical movement, and Coward a Britain conquered by Hitler.

Two other novels provide partial precedents. The first is The War in the Air (1908) by H.G. Wells, an author Orwell read throughout his life. It has a tripolar side, depicting a war between Germany, the US and Britain, and a Chinese and Japanese force. The second is Swastika Night by Katharine Burdekin (writing as Murray Constantine).

Orwell never referred to Swastika Night in any publication, and his most prominent biographer, D.J. Taylor, has claimed there is no definitive evidence that he read it. However, as it was a Left Book Club selection and he was a Left Book Club author, Orwell would at least have known about it. The novel describes a world divided into two rival camps, not three, but portrays allies becoming rivals. The competing superstates are Nazi Germany and imperial Japan, who were on the same side when the book was written.

In his own words

The most satisfying place to look for inspiration for Nineteen Eighty-Four’s geopolitical vision, though, is in Orwell’s own experiences and non-fiction reading. Before the 1940s, Orwell spent a lot of time learning and writing critically about three oppressive systems: capitalism, fascism and Soviet communism.

In terms of capitalism, working as a colonial police officer in Burma in the 1920s left him disgusted with what he called the “dirty work of empire”. Living in England later led him to write works on class injustices such as The Road to Wigan Pier (1937).

In terms of fascism, he wrote scathingly about Hitler and Franco. Orwell was also appalled by accounts of repression under Stalin. His time fighting in Spain reinforced his dark view of Moscow and he saw erstwhile allies become arch-enemies as the anti-Franco coalition broke down, and the Soviets began treating groups that had been part of it as villains.

Second world war news stories had an impact as well. In 1939 and 1941 respectively, newspapers were full of reports of Moscow and Berlin signing a non-aggression pact, and then of Moscow switching sides to join the Allies.

And in a 1945 essay, Orwell mocked news of many people on the left embracing the fervently anti-Communist Chinese Nationalist Party leader, Chiang Kai-shek, once he was with the Allies – seemingly having forgetten their earlier disdain for Chiang’s brutal effort to exterminate the Chinese Communist Party.

WInston Churchill, Franklin D Roosevelt and Josef Stalin site on chairs together.
Carving up the world: Stalin, Roosevelt and Churchill at the Tehran conference in 1943.
U.S. Signal Corps photo

But perhaps the most notable 1940s news story of all relating to Nineteen Eighty-Four’s geopolitics has been flagged by Taylor as one that broke in 1943. He notes that Orwell sometimes claimed a key inspiration for his final novel were the reports of Roosevelt, Stalin and Churchill talking at the 1943 Tehran conference about carving up the post-war world into three spheres.

Nineteen Eighty-Four has had extraordinary longevity as a go-to text for political commentary. There are many explanations for its staying power, but right now a key feature of it may be its relevance to thinking about both repression of dissent and Newspeak-style propaganda in many individual countries – and the unsettling geopolitical tensions in the world at large.

The Conversation

The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. How George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four predicted the global power shifts happening now – https://theconversation.com/how-george-orwells-nineteen-eighty-four-predicted-the-global-power-shifts-happening-now-273122

Springboks legend won’t hold grudge if Tony Brown chooses All Blacks

Source: Radio New Zealand

Tony Brown. photosport

Former South Africa captain Jean de Villiers says he will not hold a grudge should Tony Brown decide to exit the Springboks and return to New Zealand ahead of the 2027 Rugby World Cup.

Following Scott Robertson’s shock departure as All Blacks head coach last week, New Zealand Rugby are searching for his successor midway through a Rugby World Cup cycle.

Jamie Joseph has been touted as the favourite to take over and that has linked Brown to a position within the next All Blacks coaching group, despite being the Springboks’ assistant coach.

Speculation is rife that Brown and Joseph will once again combine ahead of the global tournament in Australia, with the pair long-time colleagues having coached together at the Highlanders and in Japan.

It would be a huge blow for the Springboks should that happen with Brown playing a significant role in their development since the 2023 World Cup triumph.

Brown is contracted to South Africa Rugby and has confirmed to The Post that he has no out-clause with the Springboks that would allow him to coach the All Blacks in the wake of Robertson’s sacking – and nor has he been tapped on the shoulder by NZR.

“I’m obviously contracted,” Brown told The Post. “I don’t have an out of my contract, so I’m back in South Africa [until the Rugby World Cup].”

It raises the prospect of NZR needing to pay a huge break-fee to SA Rugby if they want to pursue Brown.

De Villiers told the Boks Unpacked podcast the conundrum Brown faced is “an extremely difficult one”.

“It’s an interesting one. As a human being, I absolutely only have praise and respect for Tony Brown, I think he’s a fantastic guy,” de Villiers said.

Former Springboks captain Jean de Villiers. PHOTOSPORT

“I had the pleasure of playing one season with him at the Stormers and I’ve spent some time with him since he’s been back in his coaching role, and he is just a top person.

“You go in and you become a coach, and you want to be successful in that role as well. He’s been fantastically successful with the Springboks with what he’s added.

“If you can potentially be in the situation where he is closer to his family, it makes more sense for him in his personal capacity and for his family, and maybe financially etc. Can we hold it against him? I don’t think you can.

“But is he the kind of person who will just leave a project halfway through? I don’t think he will either, so it’s an extremely difficult one.”

On Monday, South Africa head coach Rassie Erasmus took to social media by posting a meme of Brown, captioned, ‘I’m not leaving’, but there will concern among Boks fans that he will want to go back to their historic rivals.

“Either way I think the right thing will happen. Throw in Rassie Erasmus’ name there and I’m pretty sure his contract with Tony Brown will have been watertight,” de Villiers said.

NZR is in the early stages of the recruitment process, with chair David Kirk saying last week they would “cast the net wide”.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Italian fashion designer Valentino Garavani dies at 93

Source: Radio New Zealand

Italian fashion legend Valentino Garavani, whose elegant evening gowns were favoured for decades by some of the world’s most glamorous women, has died at 93, according to his foundation.

Born in the northern town of Voghera, Italy, in 1932, Valentino – who was popularly known by his first name – learned his trade in the haute couture ateliers in Paris before founding his own line in Rome in 1959.

Early on, he became known for his red dresses, in a rich scarlet shade that became his signature colour to the extent that it was known within the industry as “Valentino red”.

In 1960, he met his long-time business partner (and, for 12 years, romantic partner) Giancarlo Giammetti, then a young architecture student. Together, the pair turned Valentino SpA into an internationally recognised brand.

One of Valentino’s first famous customers was the actress Elizabeth Taylor, whom he met while she was filming Cleopatra in Rome in the early 1960s.

Other glamorous followers – and buyers – of Valentino’s work in the early years of his career included Begum Aga Khan, Queen Paola of Belgium, the actresses Audrey Hepburn and Joan Collins and Jacqueline Kennedy, who even wore a Valentino gown to wed Greek shipping giant Aristotle Onassis in 1968.

His popularity would continue as the decades progressed.

Valentino spent much of the 1970s in New York, surrounded by a wide circle of friends that included the artist Andy Warhol and Vogue editor Diana Vreeland. In the 1990s, he became a favourite of the decade’s supermodels, including Claudia Schiffer and Naomi Campbell.

His creations also featured regularly on the red carpet.

At the Oscars alone, noteworthy Valentino ensembles over the years have included the heavily-beaded gown Jane Fonda wore in 1981 when she accepted the Best Actor prize for her father, Henry; the vintage black-and-white gown Julia Roberts wore in 2001; the pastel mint caftan-style gown Jennifer Lopez wore in 2003 and the sunshine yellow gown Cate Blanchett wore in 2005. (Both Roberts and Blanchett won Oscars in those respective years.) At the 2002 Academy Awards, Anne Hathaway walked the red carpet in an ornate Valentino gown, accompanied by the designer himself.

In more recent years, Zendaya, Carey Mulligan and Gemma Chan have been among fashion plate Oscars attendees wearing the label to much acclaim.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon confirms h’es about to announce 2026 election date

Source: Radio New Zealand

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. RNZ / Samuel Rillstone

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon is expected to announce when this year’s election will be held tomorrow.

The first National Party caucus of the year gets underway on Tuesday afternoon in Christchurch, where Luxon is expected to announce the date of the election at the end of the retreat on Wednesday.

“It’s a chance to bring our team together and align on the year ahead,” Luxon told Morning Report on Tuesday.

While Luxon was tight-lipped over who was speaking at the event, he said he would be announcing the election date.

“I will announce the election date, and that’s just because that’s been a strong convention in New Zealand, I think it gives everybody clarity,” he said.

“Once announced, we get back to the job of getting on with the show and getting the country sorted.”

If announced at the National Party’s annual retreat, it would continue the tradition in recent years of setting a date at the start of the political year.

The decision of when to hold the election is up to the prime minister, who can pick any date at any time, as long as it’s called before the end of the current three-year parliamentary term.

The last possible legal date for this year’s election to be held is 19 December.

Several pundits are picking the election to be called for after the American mid-terms set for 3 November, which will be a key indicator for how US President Donald Trump’s remaining two years in office will fare.

Saturday, 7 November has been mentioned most frequently as a likely date.

Every general election for the past 30 years, since the introduction of MMP in 1996, has been sometime between September and November, except for one.

It comes after Luxon delivered his State of the Nation speech, hosted by the Auckland Business Chamber, on Monday.

There were also no policy announcements during the speech, though Luxon repeated National’s pledge to raise the default KiwiSaver contribution rate if re-elected.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

When will Election Day be, and how is it decided?

Source: Radio New Zealand

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon is expected to announce the 2026 Election Day soon. RNZ / Marika Khabazi / Photo illustration / 123rf

Explainer – Only one person can decide when Election Day 2026 is. How is it picked, and when is it likely to be?

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon is set to announce a date this week, continuing the tradition in recent years of setting a date at the start of the political year.

It’s the starting gun that fires off a year-long sprint to determine the next Parliament, but how does the PM make this decision? Here’s how it works.

Who decides when the election will be?

It’s all down to the prime minister’s call.

The Cabinet Manual which guides central government states that “the Prime Minister alone” has the right to advise the governor-general to dissolve Parliament and call a general election.

However, in the current National-led coalition government, Luxon would definitely be consulting partners New Zealand First leader Winston Peters and ACT leader David Seymour before announcing any date, said Massey University professor of politics Richard Shaw.

“The decision won’t be one that the leader of the National Party takes without having had extensive conversations with the leader of the two coalition parties,” he said.

“The prime minister will front this, but it will be an announcement on the part of the government.”

Luxon on Tuesday morning would not be drawn on the exacty date, but confirmed to RNZ he would be announcing the date this week.

“I will announce the election date, and that’s just because that’s been a strong convention in New Zealand.”

When are they required to make that call?

They can pick a date any time, but an election has to be called before the end of the current three-year parliamentary term.

The last possible legal date for this year’s election to be held is 19 December.

What can we expect? When could it be?

Several pundits are picking the election to be called for after the American mid-terms set for 3 November, which will be a key indicator for how US President Donald Trump’s remaining two years in office will fare.

Saturday, 7 November has been mentioned most frequently as a likely date.

“My money is on” that date, Victoria University of Wellington professor of law Dean Knight said.

Every general election for the past 30 years since the introduction of MMP in 1996 has been sometime between September and November except for one.

Christopher Luxon and family watch election returns on Election Night 2023. Supplied / National Party

How does a PM make that decision?

The date of an election is a symbolic beginning for the months of electioneering and campaigning ahead.

It’s not required that election days be on a Saturday, but that’s the longstanding convention which allows for greater turnout.

When choosing a date, prime ministers want to avoid things like public holiday weekends, major central bank decisions, the start of Daylight Savings Time or other major events. In 2011, Key made sure to pick a date after the Rugby World Cup final which was hosted in New Zealand.

“You narrow things down,” Shaw said. “It’s an art as much as a science.”

“There are very few rules for how all this happens. It’s largely vibes-based, really.”

Are elections always about the same time?

It’s pretty typical now for an election date to be named for Spring and to be announced early in the year.

While it’s not required, Knight said that at this point, the early call is quite bedded in.

“I have no doubt that the practice that the prime minister announce the election date well in advance, in the first or second month of an election year, has now crystallised into a constitutional convention.”

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announced on 19 January the 2023 election would be on 14 October, and in 2020 she announced on 28 January an election for 19 September.

Jacinda Ardern celebrates on Election Day 2020. Getty Images

Back in 2017, Prime Minister Bill English announced on 1 February the vote would be 23 September, while in 2014, Prime Minister John Key didn’t announce until 10 March the 20 September election date. In 2011, Key announced the election on 2 February, and it wasn’t held until 26 November.

“The rhythm of parliamentary terms means a general election for a full-term Parliament usually falls in October/November; an announcement in January/February gives folk 9 or 10 months’ advance warning – unlike the old days when it was often only a couple of months’ advance notice,” Knight said.

Prime Minister Helen Clark tended to call elections later – not until June, July and September in 2002, 2005 and 2008, respectively. But that seems to have gone out of vogue.

“An early announcement, as seen in the last five elections, is no longer merely a good idea but is now obligatory and would be met with political heat if ignored,” Knight said.

“You generally get a reasonably early announcement for all kinds of reasons, some of which have to do with stability and predictability,” Shaw said.

Parliament typically runs for the entire three-year term, but there’s actually no law requiring the election to wait until the term ends. An election can be called even earlier – what is known as a “snap” election. Perhaps the most famous snap election was Robert Muldoon’s call in 1984 for a vote that was held one month later.

Robert Muldoon’s snap election in 1984 was one of the most surprising election calls of the past 50 years. Alexander Turnbull Library

The only election in recent years that came far earlier than expected was the one Helen Clark called in 2002 for 27 July. Clark called that election in mid-June, after Labour’s coalition with the Alliance party fell apart.

Once the election is called, it’ll still be some time before the regulated period for election advertising begins – it runs the three months before the election date. Before the election, Parliament must officially dissolve and on Writ Day, the governor-general will issue formal direction to the Electoral Commission to hold the election.

This year, the election will take place under changes in the new Electoral Amendment Bill that passed Parliament just before Christmas. Among other things, it requires people to enrol at least 13 days before the election and ends same-day voter enrolment. The government said the bill would improve the timeliness, efficiency and integrity of elections, but the opposition said it would suppress voting.

Do other countries decide election dates like this?

It’s fairly common in many parliamentary democracies, unlike places like America where the date of Election Day is always the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November (typically, around 2 to 8 November).

Australia, the UK and Canada all have similar processes where the PM must call an election before their term ends, or earlier if they want a snap election – sometimes to confirm a new leader’s power base.

Last year, when long-standing Canadian PM Justin Trudeau stepped down, his replacement Mark Carney called a snap election for the very next month, which he easily won. Japan’s new prime minister Sanae Takaichi, who just took office in October, has also called for a snap election as soon as February.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Price of meth at new low, cocaine demand growing according to Drug Trends Survey

Source: Radio New Zealand

Methamphetamine seized at the border in March 2025. Supplied / Customs

The price of methamphetamine is the lowest it has ever been in New Zealand according to new research.

The average price of a point, or 100 milligrams – a standard dose, is now $74.

The price of a gram halved within eight years – from $563 in 2017 to $334 in 2025 – or $253 when adjusted for inflation.

The Drug Trends Survey found that consumption had also doubled within a year.

More than 8800 people took part in the latest survey, conducted by Massey University’s SHORE and Whāriki Research Centre between 9 May and 6 October 2025.

Leader of the drug research team Professor Chris Wilkins said the increase in the use of methamphetamine was a concern.

He said methamphetamine used to only come from Myanmar, but Mexican drug cartels were increasingly identified as trafficking the drug to New Zealand.

Researchers also found there were more people using cocaine in New Zealand than ever before.

Wilkins said it was an emerging drug, as the use remained low compared to methamphetamine.

More than 40 percent of users said the drug was easy to obtain, compared to less than 20 percent in 2018.

The price remained high, although the average cost was unknown, and was disproportionately used by those with a higher income.

Wilkins believed the increase was also linked to Mexican drug cartels.

Vaping had declined recently the survey found. 123RF

It also found a decline in the use of alcohol, as well as smoking and vaping.

“We tracked a sharp rise in vaping from 2020 to 2024, but more recently this has declined, perhaps reflecting stricter regulation of retail vape outlets and greater social controls, particularly for youth,” Wilkins said.

Wikins said there was also a decline in the use of MDMA and LSD, which was a surprise, as there was a growing interest in these drugs for therapeutic use.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Person critically hurt after assault in Taranaki

Source: Radio New Zealand

Police were called to Ihaia Road in Ōpunake at around 10.15pm on Monday. RNZ / Marika Khabazi

A person has been critically injured in an assault in Taranaki overnight.

Police were called to Ihaia Road in Ōpunake at around 10.15pm on Monday after reports a person had been seriously assaulted.

The person was taken to hospital in a critical condition.

Police said cordons are in place and Ihaia Road is closed as officers work to determine the circumstances of the assault.

Ihaia Road is expected to remain closed for several hours. Members of the public are advised to avoid the area.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Health survey shows attitudes to sun protection, skin cancer slipping

Source: Radio New Zealand

The slogan ‘Slip, slop, slap and wrap’ seems to have been forgotten. 123RF / Sosiukin

Public health researchers say more than a decade of underinvestment in skin cancer prevention has resulted in a “lost generation” largely unaware of the risks of sunburn, and ignorant of the once-popular slogan ‘Slip, slop, slap and wrap’.

The 2025 National Skin Cancer Survey – a Cancer Society and University of Otago collaboration – asked 2198 adults aged 18 years and over about their attitudes to sun protection.

Its authors said the results, published on Tuesday, revealed high rates of reported sunburn and widespread misconceptions about sun safety, and showed that positive attitudes towards tanning persist.

They said renewed investment and action in skin cancer prevention was urgently needed.

Te Whatu Ora and the Ministry of Health have been approached for comment.

Otago University senior research fellow and lead author Bronwen McNoe said the high levels of reported sunburn were surprising and concerning.

Nearly two-thirds (64 percent) of respondents reported at least one sunburn during the 2024/25 summer, with 26 percent reporting a severe sunburn – pain for two or more days, or blistering.

McNoe said such rates had not been seen since 2010.

“It’s quite high, given that sunburn is an important risk factor for melanoma [skin cancer] development.

“Particularly concerning is the rate of sunburn in young people,” McNoe said, with the rate among young women “very, very high”.

The survey found 18-24-year-olds reported the highest rates of sunburn at 82 percent, with 87 percent of females reporting they’d been sunburned at least once last summer.

Half of all 18-24-year-olds reported severe sunburn.

McNoe said the results could be attributed to a lack of investment in national skin cancer prevention and sun protection campaigns over the past 15 years, in addition to the rise of social media influence.

“Not all young people even know what the slogan, ‘Slip, slop, slap, wrap’ is, which is reflective of that lost generation, if you like.

Sunburn stats painted an alarming picture among adults aged 18-24. Public Health Communication Centre

“The other thing that’s happened is that we’ve got global influences influencing that younger population.

“The likes of TikTok, we’ve got a real problem this summer with young people… particularly young women, following that trend with the high UV index [and wanting] to go out and tan, which is really concerning.”

McNoe said the survey showed myths and misconceptions about sunburn and sun protection also persisted.

The report found a third of respondents believed a cap provided adequate sun protection and thought SPF50 didn’t need to be re-applied as often as lower ratings.

“A quarter of New Zealanders believe a suntan protects you against melanoma, which it certainly doesn’t,” McNoe said.

She said sunburn damaged cellular DNA, which could result in skin cancer down the line.

“Tanning is just your body’s defence mechanism to protect you from that DNA damage, so it’s really just a sign that your skin is damaged.”

She said there was latency period between sunburn and skin cancer, and if current trends continued, a spike in skin cancer rates could be expected in 20-30 years.

According to the report, close to $495 million is spent on skin cancer treatment in New Zealand every year.

McNoe said skin cancer was highly preventable, with more than 90 percent of the 100,000 annual diagnoses linked to excessive sun exposure and, therefore, prevention was worth investing in.

She said campaigns raising awareness about the harm of sunburn, as well as policies around providing sun protection and shade in workplaces, schools and public spaces, could help turn around New Zealand’s skin cancer rates.

She said Australia had invested in such campaigns over the past 40 years and, unlike New Zealand, was now seeing a decline in skin cancer rates, particularly in younger populations.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

A fisherman’s yellow leggings helped save them after capsizing at Tolaga Bay

Source: Radio New Zealand

Three men spent six hours in the water off Tolaga Bay before a major search and rescue effort reached them. Supplied / NZDF

Yellow leggings and fuel tanks helped three cray fishermen who were in the water for about seven hours after capsizing near Tolaga Bay be rescued.

The men were found off Tolaga Bay on Wednesday, after their commercial boat Sidetracked capsized suddenly when it got tangled in a craypot line.

On board the boat were skipper Nicholas Destounis, second skipper Blake Powell and third deck hand Aaron Bastion.

Destounis said after the line got tangled they quickly got washed onto the reef, with breakers then coming over the boat filling it up with water and rolling it over.

As a commercial boat, he said they had lifesaving gear onboard, but the boat flipped so quickly they didn’t have time to grab it.

“We eventually got clear of the reef and picked up some flotation devices, which were two fuel tanks.”

The tanks floated out of the boat after it flipped, which Destounis said he then tied them together with some rope he had on him.

“We were spread apart at first, but we decided to all get together and we frantically tried to paddle in towards Marau Point, but the wind and the tide were against us.”

Destounis said the wind was blowing them down the coast.

“So it was blowing us out to sea and we were trying to paddle against it. But we kept paddling trying to get closer for seven hours and we just end up in a straight line rather than getting blown further out to sea.”

He said they tried to head towards an island but drifted past it, and at the time they were rescued their hope was to end up close to land on the south end of Tolaga Bay.

Three men spent six hours in the water off Tolaga Bay before a major search and rescue effort reached them. Supplied / NZDF

Rescuers spotted overhead

One of the first on the scene was an RNZAF P-8A Poseidon, that morning’s training flight having quickly become a real-life search.

Destounis, who had been wearing yellow leggings, said the men used them to signal the aircraft.

“Once they got closer, [we] waved the yellow leggings in the air, and we were spotted.”

Following the rescue Flight Lieutenant Pilkinton said the bright-coloured object make it easier for the crew to spot them.

The crew then contacted the rescue helicopter, which arrived on the scene in minutes and dropped smoke in the water that the Coastguard was able to see easily.

The men were then pulled out the water by Coastguard volunteers, along with three Surf Life Saving IRBs and taken to Tolaga Beach.

“Once I got onto the rescue boat, I just had to lie down. I found it hard to stand up. My legs were like jelly,” Destounis said.

He said they were greeted by family, friends and rescuers when they arrived at the beach before being whisked to Gisborne hospital.

He said there were a lot of tears and hugs upon returning home.

“We certainly felt as though we were wanted.”

Cost of a capsize

For Destounis fishing on Sidetracked is his primary source of income.

But the last five years had been tough, he said, between Covid, cyclones and issues with forestry slash.

“We’ve had no significant income for five years and we were hoping that we could get something done in this one,” he said. “It didn’t start the way we wanted.”

Sidetracked has since been recovered and Destounis’s focus is on getting back in the water and getting business back underway.

But he said getting the boat rebuilt or replaced would come at a high cost.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Hurricanes wing Fehi Fineanganofo heading to England after 2026 season

Source: Radio New Zealand

Hurricanes wing Fehi Fineanganofo. Photosport / Patrick Hoelscher

Hurricanes wing Fehi Fineanganofo will be heading to the English rugby premiership following the 2026 Super Rugby Pacific and NPC seasons.

The Newcastle Red Bulls have signed Fineanganofo on a two-year deal from the beginning of the 2026-27 Prem season.

Since signing with the Hurricanes in November 2024, the 23-year-old has made 12 appearances and scored six tries for the club.

In addition to his time with the Hurricanes, the dynamic wing has also played three NPC seasons with Bay of Plenty and was a standout for the All Blacks Sevens between 2023 and 2024, featuring for the side at the 2024 Paris Olympics.

“I’m really excited for this new challenge and opportunity at Newcastle Red Bulls, but my main focus right now is Super Rugby Pacific and the NPC here in New Zealand,” Fineanganofo said.

“I’m super grateful to New Zealand Rugby, the All Blacks Sevens, Bay of Plenty, and the Hurricanes for the chance to achieve my dream of becoming a professional rugby player.

“I’m especially grateful for the support I’ve had over the years, getting me through injuries and back on the field. I want to end this year the right way and chase trophies in both Super Rugby Pacific and the NPC.

“After that, I can’t wait to start a new chapter with Newcastle and the brand of rugby they want to bring to the Premiership.”

While disappointed to lose a player of Fineanganofo’s quality, Hurricanes head coach Clark Laidlaw remains supportive of his decision to head abroad.

“We’ve really enjoyed Fehi’s introduction to Super Rugby Pacific, and we feel there is a hugely exciting future ahead for him,” Laidlaw said.

“Obviously, he’s made his decision to go overseas to Newcastle, and we’ve been in open communication the whole way through it. I understand, respect, and support the decision he and his family have made.

“We look forward to him playing well this year and finishing well in New Zealand rugby, and then wishing him all the best for the future and in his career.”

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Tight job market fuels interest in overseas volunteer work

Source: Radio New Zealand

Kate Wareham shops in markets at Apia, Samoa. Supplied/VSA

An organisation offering volunteer work abroad says New Zealand’s tight job market is fuelling interest in its assignments and it has plenty on offer.

Some local charities are turning away people wanting to volunteer amid a flood of interest they say is linked to the high rate of unemployment.

Volunteer Service Abroad (VSA) chief executive Kate Wareham has noticed an increase in people applying who were out of work.

“It could be triggered by a redundancy or just a challenge in the job market here in New Zealand, but often it’s something people have been thinking about for quite a while,” she said. “It’s been tucked away in the back of their mind.”

VSA offers about 150 assignments each year for those who can commit to at least a year, with travel and accommodation costs paid for and an allowance provided for food.

Wareham said they worked across 10 countries in the wider Pacific, teaming up with organisations on the ground that worked alongside local businesses, schools, health centres and environmental projects.

“I’ve seen some incredible people come through our volunteer programme recently, from neurosurgeons to amazing vets, through to people who are specialised in water engineering or climate-related work, and the skillsets are certainly quite deep.”

She said the work could be very rewarding.

“The thing that unites people interested in this volunteer work is a real desire to make a difference, a level of resilience and adaptability, because things don’t always go to plan, and also the interest in working across cultures and understanding that things are going to be different to what you’re used to here in New Zealand.”

VSA is funded by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, and offers roles to anyone aged up to 75. Partners can join them, but not children.

Marie Aekins is about to embark on her sixth assignment with the organisation. She has worked on Bougainville Island in Papua New Guinea and Tonga, and is about to return for a second assignment in Vanuatu.

She lived in Vanuatu as a child, when her dad worked there, and plans to celebrate her 60th birthday there.

“I love the country and the people and the food,” she said. “There’s so many things I love about it.

“I think, because I had such a great childhood over there, it’s come full circle to go back there, and now being able to have the privilege of actually living and working there.”

She will use her administration skills to help local businesses thrive.

Marie Aekins with local Tongan businessman Minoru Nishi attend VSA 60th anniversary. Supplied/VSA

“The thing I enjoy the most is getting to learn about different cultures and the people in our Pacific neighbours, working alongside them trying to learn the language. Just being immersed in a different culture, I get so much out of it, much more than I put in, I feel.”

If the thought of exotic creatures comes to mind, Aekins says she only had one bad encounter – a giant centipede in her bed.

The rest is adventure.

While on Bougainville, she and other Kiwis swam in the croc-infested sea, under the watchful gaze of a local spotter.

“It’s kind of a rite of passage that you go in once,” she said. “There were three New Zealand police stationed down there at all times, so one day, a group of us did go [in the sea].

“I was in and out of there like a shot, let me tell you.”

Heath Ingham chairs the Aotearoa Cultural and Volunteer Exchange, which is part of a global federation offering roles in 20 countries with non-profit organisations for school-leavers and those aged up to 35.

“There is a lot to choose from, like working in kindergartens or Montessori in various European countries, working with turtle hatcheries in Central America… teaching English in Taiwan.”

He said interest had increased, because the cost to embark on such a volunteer exchange for a year is often the equivalent of a month in London.

“We know that the traditional OE to the UK is still a popular thing with Kiwis, but I think people now are just trying to see what more is out there, because it is so expensive.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Concern ‘ghost houses’ will turn Queenstown into trainwreck

Source: Radio New Zealand

A former World Bank senior economist says people buying holiday homes and leaving them empty in Queenstown for much of the year are on track to “hollow out” the town, unless authorities take strong action to build more affordable housing for workers.

Data suggests, at any given time, more than a quarter of the district’s properties are unoccupied.

On Census night 2023, there were 3480 empty dwellings and 3402 listed as ‘residents away’, compared with 18,219 properties occupied or under construction.

At the same time, the cost of renting or buying a house has risen sharply, and more than 1600 households have joined a waitlist for an affordable housing scheme.

Ralph Hanan, who has lived in Queenstown for nearly two decades and spent 29 years at the World Bank, said the number of empty houses would likely increase in coming years.

He told RNZ councils and the government could not compel people to rent their properties out.

“If these ‘ghost houses’ were available, of course, that means that the money that went into new developments for new housing could be spent somewhere else for a more productive enterprise within our economy,” he said.

Housing development in Queenstown. RNZ / Nate McKinnon

“I think it’s a real long shot to expect people who have a house here to open it up for 9-10 months of the year to whomsoever to come and live. It’s not good economics, but it’s reality.”

Hanan said urgent structural changes were needed to ensure Queenstown remained a viable place to live and work, including affordable housing for local workers.

A town increasingly owned from afar

Little data is available on exactly who owns Queenstown’s “ghost houses”, but property maintenance companies told RNZ they had noticed a major shift in the market.

Peak to Peak Property Services director Matthew Kurtovich said about 60 percent of his clients either rented out their homes as short-term accommodation or kept them empty, except for the “one or two weeks a year” they visited.

“We’ve had a huge shift to absentee owners,” he said. “The business was predominantly built over locals and providing service for locals, but as the places change and become a lot more holiday destination, there’s a lot more investment properties around and a lot more apartment complexes that we deal with.

“It’s definitely a change of scope for the business in the last 10 years.”

In recent years, several other maintenance businesses had emerged, catering specifically for absentee owners – offering to pay bills, clean gutters, keep cars WOF-compliant and even stock fridges for people who lived away from Queenstown.

Those companies declined to speak to RNZ.

Low-rental yields discouraging landlords

Some Queenstown propertyowners would rather let their homes gather dust than rent them out, a property investment specialist said, because rental income lagged far behind soaring property values.

Peak to Peak Property Services director Matthew Kurtovich said about 60 percent of his clients either rented out their homes as short-term accommodation or kept them empty between visits. RNZ / Nate McKinnon

Despite Queenstown rentals being among the most expensive and under-demand in the country, Opes Partners managing partner Andrew Nicol said property owners did not have much to gain from long-term tenants.

“It is really expensive to own a property there,” he said. “The yields are just disproportionately low at the moment.

“I don’t know that they’ll catch up any time soon. I’ve seen yields as low as three percent for people that are buying investment properties.”

Nicol said healthy-homes requirements and tenancy rules introduced by the previous Labour government – even those later repealed – had pushed some landlords off the long-term market.

Meanwhile, people could only rent out a house as a short-term rental – for example, an Airbnb – for a maximum of 90 days without resource consent.

“Because of the restrictions around tenancies – healthy homes and not being able to give a nine-day termination – there were a lot of properties taken off the market,” he said. “If you were really rich and you had no debt, and it was just a bit of a hassle, [you might think], ‘Well, I’ll rent it out for the 90 days I’m allowed to and then I’ll have it empty the rest of the year’.

“Or, ‘I’ll just have it empty [all the time]’. There are some people like that.”

However, he said that was slowly changing, with more rentals coming back online in Queenstown, after the re-introduction of no-fault evictions and other measures designed to give landlords more confidence.

On the other hand, it was becoming more costly to use houses for short-term accommodation, Nicol said.

“I know a lot of people have made some really good money, but the cost of cleaning, for example, has gone up quite significantly in Queenstown and the Airbnb fees have gone up. There’s further GST implications now.

“You can make some really good money, but there are just significant costs that go with that as well.”

Capital gains tax could make a difference – mayor

Mayor John Glover said many of Queenstown’s ghost houses were legitimate holiday houses bought by people who intended to visit or move down eventually.

“A lot of people, even in New Zealand, they’re cashed out,” he said. “They’re maybe retiring, they want to move down, or have the opportunity to come and have their holidays here.

“We live in a free market economy.”

Yet empty houses were a “fundamental” problem in Queenstown and in Wānaka, he said.

Queenstown Mayor John Glover. RNZ/ Katie Todd

“There’s a place for holiday homes all over the world and tourism hotspots, it’s always the case,” Glover said. “Elsewhere in the world, various interventions come along, such as local ownership clauses on new developments, that try to address the fact that there are far more people with money than the people trying to live and work here.”

He said a capital gains tax on second homes might lead to fewer ghost houses, although he framed that as a broader governmental debate.

Personally, he would be prepared to pay a capital gains tax, if it meant more services for the town.

“I think, if we want to have some of the things in this country that we aspire to, we need to look at how we get the revenue to do that,” Glover said. “I’m constantly told by people, if you go to Sweden, you get free education, the public transport is cheaper, there’s all sorts of benefits, health services, and they’ll have 75 percent top tax rates, they’ll have capital gains tax, they’ll have inheritance tax.

“The issue is we don’t have those in this country.”

In the meantime, Glover said he was focused on ensuring Queenstown had a good supply of rental stock.

He said Simplicity’s plan to build up to 600 long-term rental houses on Ladies Mile would help.

Glover would also like to see the Queenstown Lakes Community Housing Trust scaled up, potentially by requiring developers to contribute to it.

“We’re trying to twist the arm of government and make the case that, when landowners get a significant zoning uplift and so they go from farm paddocks to housing estates, then maybe we get to capture some of the value of that.”

Pressure on the workforce

Ralph Hanan said he’d like to see 10 percent of the properties at each new housing development set aside for the housing trust’s affordable schemes.

Without action, he warned, workers would be pushed out of the town and more houses would sit empty in the centre.

“If we don’t do more to retain these people, they’re going to move out of our area,” Hanan said. “They may move to dormitory suburbs like Cromwell, which is already the case, or the south of Lake Wakatipu and Kingston, which is already being developed.

“They will move out of our Queenstown City urban area pretty soon and that is not good for any city.”

“Ultimately, if you’re looking 50 years down the track, I suppose Queenstown is heading to become to become a trainwreck. It will be a place that will be less attractive for foreigners to want to come to and less attractive for people to want to live in.

“We have to avoid that. We’ve got to have structural change to make sure that we are a balanced, caring community, including all types of workers, diversity of people and diversity of our economy.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Kiwi photographer Max Alexander turns camera on ‘planetary defence’, space junk

Source: Radio New Zealand

Max Alexander will photographing New Zealand skies, while travelling here this summer. RNZ/Robin Martin

An award-winning New Zealand photographer, who has an asteroid named after him for his work in space sustainability, describes the honour as a “tremendous thrill”.

Papakura-raised, but UK-based Max Alexander is quick to point out his namesake ‘6548 Maxalexander’, discovered in 1988 by Belgian astronomer Henri Debehogne, is no threat to Earth, despite being 12km wide.

“It’s in the asteroid belt, so there’s no need to worry about it,” he said. “It’s the same size as the asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs 66 million years ago, but you don’t need to wear a hard hat to work tomorrow – it’s all fine.”

The former New Plymouth Boys’ High School student describes himself as a science communication specialist, who uses visual storytelling to get messages across.

He said the timing of the International Astronomical Union honour – which followed a nomination from a former professor of his at the University Collage of London – was interesting, as his current work involved illustrating “planetary defence”.

Two hours before dawn, the sunlit trails of constellations of Orion, Taurus and the Milky Way are captured individually, using long-exposure photography. Max Alexander

“Deflecting asteroids is the only natural disaster you can do something about,” he said. “You can’t do anything about an earthquake or a volcano here in Taranaki, or a tsunami or whatever, but an asteroid, you can deflect it.”

Alexander explained NASA’s Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) mission a few years ago had successfully changed the orbit of the asteroid Dimorphos.

“I’m involved with the Hera mission – the European Space Agency’s follow up mission – that will go and characterise the impact crater from the American DART mission, which fired a 600kg mass at the asteroid and managed to deflect it very successfully.”

Alexander said the work was important work, because one day an asteroid would need to be deflected from its orbit, as it had a chance of hitting the Earth.

“Importantly, there’s an asteroid called 2024 YR4 and, in 2032, it has a 4 percent chance of hitting the moon. That probability is likely too high for NASA, so they may be deflecting that asteroid.”

The photographer, who trained at the Wellington Polytechnic School of Design, would take pictures of efforts to protect the Earth from asteroids, so-called “planetary defence”.

The work included photographing the people and facilities at the forefront of this important project, and also impact craters around the world over the next two years.

It would culminate in an exhibition, also featuring still and video images taken from the RAMSES spacecraft, which will accompany Apophis, a 375m asteroid, as it safely passes close to Earth in 2029.

This hypervelocity impact test hangs like a piece of art in the home of Donald Kessler. In the 1970s, Kessler and colleague Burt Cour-Palais studied the build-up of space debris in Earth’s orbit. Max Alexander

Alexander said he was working as a freelance commercial/editorial photographer in Britain, when a trip to shoot the Northern Lights awakened an interest in astronomy and astrophysics, which he subsequently studied at University College London.

“I sort of changed career paths from then, and so now I specialise in the astronomy sector for international and inter-governmental organisations, and also the space industry, the UK Space Agency, European Space Agency.

“I’m a commissioned photographer for them, but also run my own projects as well, mainly about environmentalism for space, how we’re now starting to pollute space and what are we doing about the problem space sustainability.”

Alexander said much of his work was artistic in nature and the exhibition ‘Our Fragile Space’, put together over three years, was shown at the UN General Assembly and the Lloyds Building, and would soon be exhibited at the Royal Academy of Arts Courtyard in London.

Aluminium scrap piled high at a junkyard at Andalusia, Spain. Most of the debris in space is made of aluminum and there is about 10,000 tonnes of it up there. Max Alexander

It had been credited with influencing European space policy and contributing to the UK government’s creation of ISAM (In-orbit, Servicing, Assembly and Manufacture), which Alexander described as a policy of moving towards a circular-economy in space.

“There are studies showing that, in 10 years’ time, there will likely be 10 times the number of satellites in Low Earth Orbit from 10,000 to 100,000, which is the trajectory we’re currently on.

“This is the trend. You could end up affecting the delicate balance of the upper atmosphere.”

Essentially, satellites breaking up while re-entering Earth’s atmosphere released particles that could impact atmospheric chemistry and potentially slowing the repair of the ozone layer, for example.

A Space X Falcon 9 rocket heads for orbit, leaving a trail of exhaust vapours behind it. The effect of these gases in our atmosphere is now a subject for environmental investigation. Max Alexander

Alexander, whose work also showcased the benefits of the space programme, said he favoured “an everything in moderation” approach.

“We need to become good stewards of the near-space environment, to be more sustainable in space. One tangible example would be to refuel satellites.

“Satellites, as soon as they run out of fuel, that’s the end of them and they’re not just floating around. They’re travelling at tremendous velocities – you’ve essentially created space debris.

“To address the problem today, you could refuel them, you could extend the life of these missions. You could try and recycle the materials.”

As part of the ‘Our Fragile Space’ exhibition, Alexander took long-exposure photographs of the sky to illustrate the number of satellites in space and used his access in the sector to secure images of examples of material sent into orbit, creating a visual representation illustrating the potential amount of space debris already existing.

Spanish astronomer Amelia Bayo contemplates the Milky Way in the Atacama Desert, Chile. Max Alexander

His work on the project – in collaboration with Steve Kelly and Stuart Clark – was recognised with the Sir Arthur Clarke Space Achievement Team Media Award (2025), presented by the British Interplanetary Society.

Alexander also had the unique experience of teaching British astronaut Tim Peake how to take photographs while he was aboard the International Space Station.

“I photographed him during his training at different times and he was very interested in my cameras, because the same Nikon cameras were on the International Space Station.

“After some informal training, he invited me to go on his email list and to give him training when he was on the space station. I waited about a month, just so he’d got settled in, sent him an email, and then we then went through the process and the technical requirements of shooting from space.”

Alexander said they discussed good photography practice, both technical and aesthetics, and applying that to working in zero and microgravity.

“The European Space Agency ended up publishing all those emails and notes, and they asked me to choose my favourite 20 pictures that he took. He got very well known for his photography.

“I don’t want to take the credit – he very quickly took to being a photographer in space.”

Alexander said he would turn his camera towards New Zealand skies for his latest project, while travelling here over the summer, but would also bask in the honour of having an asteroid named after him – at the same time as Polynesian navigator Tupaia, who sailed on the Endeavour with James Cook, no less.

“I’m extremely proud of it, absolutely,” he said. “It’s very motivating for my work to have that asteroid named after me.

“My family is going to make me an asteroid-themed cake down in Christchurch, I’ve been told, to mark the event, with sparklers and all sorts.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

All Whites to host Finland and Chile in first NZ-hosted FIFA Series

Source: Radio New Zealand

The last time the All Whites were at Eden Park they qualified for the 2026 Football World Cup. Shane Wenzlick / www.photosport.nz

Nearly a year after they secured qualification for the Football World Cup with a victory on Eden Park, the All Whites will return to the stadium to farewell fans ahead of the global tournament.

The All Whites have confirmed their final home games ahead of FIFA World Cup 2026, taking on Chile and Finland at Eden Park in Auckland this March as part of the first FIFA Series held in Aotearoa.

The FIFA Series brings together four competing nations to play quality international fixtures against other top sides.

The four-nation FIFA Series also includes Cape Verde, which qualified for the FIFA World Cup for the first time in 2026.

World number 52 Chile and 75th-ranked Finland did not qualify for the World Cup kicking off in June, but for the All Whites (ranked 87) and Cape Verde (67) the FIFA Series will be part of an extended warm-up for the World Cup co-hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico.

Finland will become the first men’s UEFA nation to play in New Zealand in over 30 years.

Hosting a UEFA nation has been almost unheard of in NZF’s history, with only England (1991) and Hungary (1982) making the trip, while a strong Soviet Union XI toured in 1986.

Finland is not a European heavyweight, but will be strong opposition regardless, given the depth of the UEFA Confederation. In 2024, they faced the likes of England and Portugal, and their opponents last year included the Netherlands, Norway and Poland.

All Whites head coach Darren Bazeley is excited about the prospect of taking on two high-quality teams at home ahead of the FIFA World Cup 2026.

“These games are perfect for us as they will give us a real test and aid our preparation for the FIFA World Cup, while also being at home and giving fans the opportunity to support the team before we head to Canada, Mexico and the USA.

“Both Chile and Finland will be challenging opponents, so we expect some really competitive matches, which is exciting for everyone.

“2026 is going to be a massive year for football, so it’s great to announce these fixtures and kick it off in the best way possible,” Bazeley said.

All matches will be played at Eden Park, with double-header match days on Friday 27 and Monday 30 March 2026, kicking off at 4pm and 7pm.

The first match day will see Chile take on Cape Verde, before the All Whites face Finland.

The second match day will see Cape Verde versus Finland, followed by the All Whites hosting Chile.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Westpac survey shows New Zealanders are starting the year with financial stress

Source: Radio New Zealand

The fall of interest rates has done little to ease the financial stress many New Zealanders are experiencing RNZ

Many New Zealanders are starting the year feeling stressed about money despite interest rates having fallen, one bank says.

Westpac surveyed just over 1000 of its customers and found 28 percent said their holiday spending would probably or definitely cause financial stress in the new year. Another 23 percent thought it might.

Just under 20 percent said they planned to use debt to cover their costs. Just under three-quarters said they were very or moderately concerned about the cost of living.

Westpac managing director of product sustainability and marketing Sarah Hearn said there had been an increase in the number of people applying for debt consolidation loans as well as increases in the amounts they were asking for.

“While we have seen a reduction in interest rates over the last year it’s clear that people and our customers are still feel very much the cost of living and the pressure of finances is present still.

“At this time of the year, though, we would tend to see in the coming months more debt consolidation going on as people look to kind of get their finances in order and simplify the debt that they may have into the one.”

Almost a quarter said additional costs in January and February added pressure, including annual bills and the cost of sending kids back to school.

“A really high portion of people said that they’d be expecting more financial pressure at this time of the year.

“One in four people pointed out that it’s the annual bills that would be coming through, life insurance and paying off summer holidays, but it’s also the additional expenses like children going back to school. paying off the summer holiday. So some of those incidental expenses that you typically see more in January, school uniforms, books, laptops, all those sorts of things, there’s a real spike. So that puts additional pressure on top of what is already a cost of living pressure that people are feeling.”

Hearn said people were sometimes consolidating by now pay later debt, or credit card and personal loans.

If the problem was bigger than debt consolidation could fix, she said people should speak to their banks to work out what options could be available.

Loan Market mortgage adviser Bruce Patten said he was dealing with more people who wanted to top-up their mortgages to clear other debt.

“With the current market conditions there are a lot of people getting top ups to consolidate debt due to the cost of living pressures, so car or boat finance is being extended over a longer period under mortgages to provide some relief.”

This can mean lower repayments in the short term but cost more overall if the loan term is extended and people end up carrying the debt for longer.

Sign up for Money with Susan Edmunds, a weekly newsletter covering all the things that affect how we make, spend and invest money.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Research reveals a surprising line of defence against cyber attacks: accountants

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Charlene Chen, Senior Lecturer in Accounting, Macquarie University

Egor Komarov/Unsplash

When Optus, Medibank and non-bank lender Latitude Financial were hit by separate cyber attacks in the past few years, millions of Australians felt the fallout: stolen personal data, disrupted services and weeks of uncertainty. Each breach raised the same uncomfortable question: how can this keep happening?

Australians are often told cybercrime is unavoidable. Companies store vast amounts of data. Systems are complex. Attackers are sophisticated. Breaches feel like a matter of “when”, not “if”.

As a result, responses tend to focus on technology: firewalls, encryption, software updates and staff training. These are all important. But cyber risk is not just a technical problem. It is also a governance problem.

Our research suggests a quieter line of defence against attacks is already embedded inside many companies, albeit one many people rarely think about: auditors – a specialised type of financial accountant.

We found auditors who have previously worked with a company that suffered a cyber breach become far more vigilant across all their other clients. That experience changes how closely they question systems, controls and risk – even at companies that have never been hacked.

Asking the tough questions

Behind every system in a company sits a set of decisions: who is responsible, how risks are monitored, whether warnings are acted on and whether controls work in practice. This is where auditors come in.

Auditors are independent professionals who examine whether a company’s financial reporting systems and internal controls are working as they should. Internal controls are the checks and processes that help prevent errors, fraud or system failures.

Auditors do not write code or manage servers. But they ask hard questions about how systems are designed, who oversees them and whether management understands the risks.

As companies have become more digital, financial systems and IT systems have become deeply intertwined. A failure in one can quickly affect the other.

A laptop with a glowing red screen
Company IT systems are increasingly a major focus for auditors.
Fili Santillán/Unsplash

What we did and what we found

Our research examined more than 2,800 companies in the United States over a 16-year period. We tracked what happened after an auditor’s client suffered a cyber breach – and how that experience affected the auditor’s work with other clients.

The pattern was clear. Auditors who had dealt with a breached client became tougher elsewhere. We found they were 21% more likely to identify serious weaknesses in systems and controls at their other clients.

These were not random or defensive decisions. The weaknesses were often linked to technology oversight and access controls, areas closely tied to cyber risk.

Just as importantly, when these auditors issued a clean bill of health – meaning they did not identify major control problems – those companies were less likely to suffer a cyber breach later. Their clean assessments were more reliable.

A tougher mindset

We also interviewed auditors who had worked with breached clients. Their responses revealed a shift in mindset. One told us:

In the past, whatever came from the system, we said, “it’s OK, because it’s from the system”. Now we always ask: “is this really accurate?”

Others described spending more time testing controls, questioning management assumptions and involving IT specialists earlier. Living through a breach made risks tangible rather than abstract.

As one interviewee put it, breach experience becomes something that “can be brought across different clients”.

Lessons for Australia

Although our study uses US data, the implications are highly relevant to Australia.

Australia has experienced some of the world’s most high-profile cyber breaches in recent years. Cybercrime is one of the fastest-growing threats to Australian businesses.

Regulators are responding. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission has warned boards that cyber resilience is now a core governance responsibility. The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority requires financial institutions to demonstrate strong information security practices.

There is another local reason this matters. Australia’s largest listed companies are audited largely by global firms such as PwC, Deloitte, EY and KPMG. These firms share methodologies and lessons across borders.

That means insights from overseas breaches can influence audit practice in Australia before the next crisis hits.

Another dimension of cyber risk

Auditors are not cybersecurity experts, and responsibility still lies with company management and boards.

But auditors bring scepticism, independence and a system-wide perspective that many organisations lack internally. Their work often happens quietly, long before consumers feel the impact of a breach.

For investors, there is also a signal. Companies audited by breach-experienced auditors, especially when those auditors give a clean assessment, are statistically less likely to be hacked later. Audit quality is another dimension of cyber risk.

As cyber threats escalate, the auditing profession may be forced to evolve further. For Australian companies, that evolution could be timely. With public trust fragile and regulatory scrutiny increasing, learning from past breaches, even those overseas, may help prevent the next major data breach headline at home.

The Conversation

Charlene Chen does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. Research reveals a surprising line of defence against cyber attacks: accountants – https://theconversation.com/research-reveals-a-surprising-line-of-defence-against-cyber-attacks-accountants-272428

Weather live: Northland, Auckland, Coromandel in line for another blast of heavy rain

Source: Radio New Zealand

Northern areas are in line for another blast of heavy rain and winds, days after parts of Northland were flooded.

MetService has issued orange heavy rain warnings for Northland, Auckland north of the Harbour Bridge and Great Barrier Island, as well as the Coromandel Peninsula.

A strong and humid easterly flow is expected to bring heavy rain, with severe thunderstorms and localised downpours possible.

That won’t be the last of it, with forecasters saying another weather system coming in later this week will likely spark more warnings and watches.

Follow the RNZ liveblog at the top of the page for the latest updates.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Lead, arsenic and other toxic metals abound in tattoo inks sold in Australia – new study

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By William Alexander Donald, Professor of Chemistry, UNSW Sydney

Lucas Dalamarta/Unsplash

In recent decades, millions of Australians have embraced body art – an estimated 30% of adults have a tattoo. Over a third of those with tattoos have five or more pieces.

Trend reporting from industry and lifestyle sources suggests designs are becoming increasingly large, colourful and complex. Although tattoos have become more common, less attention has been paid to what’s in the inks being injected into people’s skin.

In a study published today in the Journal of Hazardous Materials, our team analysed tattoo inks available in Australia. We found they contain carcinogenic organic chemicals and toxic metals at levels that wouldn’t meet existing European safety standards.

Tattoo ink regulations

Injected into living tissue, tattoo inks are designed to last essentially permanently. Once in the body, pigments can persist, migrate through the lymphatic system or slowly break down over time.

Concerns about tattoo ink composition are not new. In Europe, early guidance on such inks emerged more than a decade ago, and was initially non-binding. As tattooing became more widespread, regulators moved towards stricter controls.

Since 2022, the European Union has enforced binding chemical limits on tattoo inks, restricting metals including arsenic, cadmium and lead as well as specific organic compounds that are known or suspected to be carcinogenic. Tattoo inks that don’t comply cannot be legally sold in EU member countries.

Australia doesn’t have an equivalent national framework for regulating tattoo ink. There’s minimal routine oversight of what tattoo inks contain in Australia, and consumers have limited information available. There’s no requirement to perform routine batch testing of inks sold in Australia.

Oversight relies on voluntary compliance, with one government survey released in 2016, and updated in 2018. That survey found many inks wouldn’t meet European guidelines, which at the time were less restrictive than the current EU framework.

Similar issues with tattoo inks have been found in the United States, Sweden and Turkey. Problems included inaccurate labelling, elevated metal concentrations, and in some cases evidence of cellular toxicity in lab tests. While people sometimes have acute reactions to tattoo ink, detecting potential long-term or chronic exposures is much harder.

What we did and what we found

The project began with an interesting question from a high school student. As part of her senior year research project, Bianca Tasevski, then at St Mary Star of the Sea College in Wollongong, contacted the School of Chemistry at UNSW Sydney to ask what was actually in tattoo inks.

To answer the question, we analysed 15 tattoo inks including black and coloured inks sold in Australia. The inks were all from major, established international brands widely used by tattoo artists.

This analysis provides a snapshot of inks currently sold in Australia, and was not intended to monitor batches across locations as a surveillance exercise, which is a role arguably more suited to regulators. Thus, specific brands are not disclosed.

With two standard, widely used laboratory approaches, we measured the concentrations of metals in the inks and screened for a broad range of organic chemicals.

Every ink we tested would have failed at least one EU safety requirement. We detected multiple toxic metals at concentrations exceeding EU law. These include arsenic, cadmium, chromium and lead. Although detected at trace levels, these concentrations are considered unacceptable for tattoo inks by EU regulators.

We also identified organic compounds in some inks, including aromatic amines restricted in EU countries because of their carcinogenic potential.

Some patterns emerged across ink types. Black inks contained a broader range of regulated metals, while brightly coloured inks often contained high levels of specific pigment-associated metals.

Black inks contained a broader range of regulated metals.
Pavel Danilyuk/Pexels

Why pigments often contain metals

Ideally, tattoo pigments should be bright, stable and resistant to fading. Metals are particularly important in obtaining such properties.

Metals are not always intentionally included in inks. They can be residues or impurities from pigment manufacturing, or byproducts from incomplete purification.

In our study, we found extremely high concentrations of some pigment-associated metals including titanium, aluminium and zirconium in specific coloured inks.

These metals aren’t currently restricted in tattoo ink under EU legislation, but their presence at such high levels is notable because of long exposure times, unknown chemical forms, and unknown effects of chronic exposure.

Ink chemistry is not the same as health risk

We’re not toxicologists, and our study doesn’t assess health effects. Our work was limited to analysing the chemical composition of tattoo inks. We didn’t measure how much of these substances are absorbed into the body, how they behave over time, or whether they cause any harm.

Health effects will depend strongly on many factors including chemical form, dose, exposure time and individual biology. Cancer Council Australia advises tattoos have not been shown to cause cancer, but notes concerns about ink composition.

A number of epidemiological studies have examined potential links between tattoos and health outcomes. However, such studies are challenging to interpret without directly measuring ink chemistry or exposure.

We need better regulation

The findings point to a clear regulatory gap in consumer protection. Many tattoo inks available in Australia wouldn’t meet current EU standards and there’s no routine system in place to identify or address this blind spot.

A sensible, practical step would be increasing the monitoring of tattoo inks and reviewing Australian standards to align with international best practice. This would improve transparency, provide clearer information to consumers, and reduce unnecessary exposure to hazardous substances.

Tattoos are a form of self-expression that many Australians value. As with other products that are injected into the body, knowing what they contain is a reasonable starting point for oversight and informed decision-making.

William Alexander Donald receives funding from the Australian Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council, Department of Education, icare Dust Diseases Board, Coal Services NSW Health & Safety Trust, and several industry research contracts, however none are related to tattoo inks or the tattoo industry. He is an advisor to Preview Health and Mass Affinity. He is president of the Australian & New Zealand Society for Mass Spectrometry.

Jake P. Violi does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. Lead, arsenic and other toxic metals abound in tattoo inks sold in Australia – new study – https://theconversation.com/lead-arsenic-and-other-toxic-metals-abound-in-tattoo-inks-sold-in-australia-new-study-273451

A year on from his second inauguration, Trump 2.0 has one defining word: power

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Bruce Wolpe, Non-resident Senior Fellow, United States Study Centre, University of Sydney

As Donald Trump celebrates the anniversary of his second inauguration as president of the United States and begins his sixth year in office, his greatest asset is power. He covets absolute power.

The greatest threat to how Trump completes his term is how he wields his power.

Indeed, in the most foolish act in foreign policy in Trump’s presidency, he has threatened punitive tariffs on Denmark and seven other NATO allies in Europe to force the sale of Greenland to the United States. They are outraged. This is a ridiculous ploy that will not deliver Greenland to Trump.




Read more:
Trump has threatened European countries with higher tariffs if he doesn’t get Greenland. Will it work?


Trump’s escalation in Denmark has already strengthened Putin’s iron resolve to get as much of Ukraine as he can. Prospects for ending the war in Ukraine are now near zero.

On top of Trump’s pending tariffs on Europe, if Trump seizes Greenland, the consequences will shake the world – including Australia. NATO will be terminated. Australia will face an existential question of whether, under those circumstances, it must terminate its alliance with the US.

We can see in a raft of polls at this one-year mark of Trump’s second term that voters across the country are expressing growing disquiet about his management of the economy and the affordability of housing and groceries, the raids by ICE agents as they seize and deport migrants as we saw last week in Minneapolis, and uncertainty about Trump’s foreign adventurism in the Americas and with Iran.

Trump is exercising this power because he can. This will jolt Republicans in Congress to break with Trump on this issue – the first such rift between Trump and his party since his re-election.

Welcome to Trump’s year six.

Trumpism in his second term

Following his election victory in 2024, Trump has been faithful to three of four pillars of Trumpism that made his base a movement that has changed America:

  • nativism (favouring US-born citizens over immigrants)

  • protectionism and tariffs

  • America First nationalism (“Make America Great Again”).

To those ends, Trump is acting aggressively, with immigration agents arresting and deporting tens of thousands, and threats to deploy US troops in American cities to enforce these policies. Trump has imposed punitive tariffs against every trading partner – including Australia, which has a significant trade deficit with the United States. Trump demands foreign companies invest in the United States and build new factories.

But on the fourth Trumpism pillar – America-First isolationism as a driver of America’s foreign policy – Trump has redefined his foreign policy settings with grander ambitions.

Trump has rejected the history of the US waging wars to project American values: protecting Asia from communism in Korea and Vietnam; turning back brutal aggression in Kuwait; punishing the export of radical Islamic terrorism in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Trump has applied these lessons to Iran – so far. It is one thing to take out Iran’s nuclear capability. It is another to do regime change – a bridge too far back to the “forever wars” Trump despises.

Trump has buried America’s posture of globalism. He has withdrawn the US from virtually all the architecture, save the United Nations itself, erected after the second world war to ensure global security, stability and prosperity. He has ordered the US out of global organisations, and has cut billions in foreign aid.

The US attack on Venezuela was about much larger goals than arresting its leader. It was about power – controlling power over critical resources in the Americas, from Venezuela to Greenland and everything in between, from Mexico to Cuba to Canada.

Politics at home

Trump is paying a high price at home for his activism in wielding power abroad. Every day Trump spends projecting power outside the United States means he is not paying attention to the American people.

A recent poll shows 56% of US adults believe Trump has gone too far on Venezuela. 57% do not want the US to strike Iran. Even before Trump’s tariff announcement on Greenland, only 17% approved of Trump’s desire to acquire Greenland, and 71% rejected using military force to do it.

Trump’s overall polls are bad. His approval rating is 40% – nearly 10 points down since his inauguration – and disapproval is at 60%. AP-NORC also finds that “Trump hasn’t convinced the Americans that the economy is in good shape.”

CNN polling reports that 55% of those surveyed believe Trump’s policies “have hurt the economy” and that Trump is not doing enough to lower prices. Grocery prices are up sharply. The latest Wall Street Journal poll shows Trump is underwater by double digits on handling inflation, and that he is not focusing enough on the economy.

On immigration, the unrest in Minneapolis and other cities from the harsh methods employed by ICE agents is also taking a toll, with Trump’s approval on that issue lagging below 40%.

But even with all these red flags and warnings from the field, Trump is undeterred. He believes that as president, he can do anything he wants to do. Guardrails that have for decades protected America’s democracy have been cast aside.

Trump has not been blocked – yet – by an ultra-conservative Supreme Court or the pliant Republican Congress for the tariffs he is imposing, the government agencies he has shut down, the monies appropriated by Congress he has terminated, the hundreds of thousands of government employees he has fired, the military strikes he has ordered without advising, much less getting approval from, Congress.

Trump is seeking more control over the economy by seeking to prosecute the chair of the Federal Reserve Bank, an independent agency that sets monetary policy, and to pack its board with loyalists to Trump’s demands that interest rates be lowered.

Since his inauguration, Trump has instructed the Justice Department to prosecute those who attempted to bring him to justice in courtrooms and impeachment proceedings in Congress.

Trump’s musings on power

As Trump consolidates his power, Trump’s musings become imperatives. After months of expressing a desire to own it, Trump is now acting aggressively to conquer Greenland.

At home, Trump is now also musing – twice so far this month – over whether the US midterm elections will be cancelled. Trump knows the likelihood of the Democrats taking back control of the House of Representatives is high. That is precisely what he suffered in the 2018 congressional elections in his first term.

Trump told Reuters last week, “We shouldn’t even have an election,” because of all his great successes.

In January, Trump told Republicans in the House, “I won’t say cancel the election, they should cancel the election, because the fake news would say, ‘He wants the elections cancelled. He’s a dictator.’ They always call me a dictator.” He told them that if the Democrats take the House back they will “find a reason to impeach” him.

Any steps taken – such as declaring martial law to suspend the midterm elections – will be catastrophic. And that is an understatement.

Based on Trump’s restless mind and command of what he believes is absolute power, at stake this year are the future of democracy at home and alliances abroad.

Bruce Wolpe receives funding from the United States Studies Centre. He has worked with the Democrats in the US Congress and for Prime Minister Julia Gillard.

ref. A year on from his second inauguration, Trump 2.0 has one defining word: power – https://theconversation.com/a-year-on-from-his-second-inauguration-trump-2-0-has-one-defining-word-power-273697

I think I’m grinding or clenching my teeth. Why? And can anything help?

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Arosha Weerakoon, Senior Lecturer and General Dentist, School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland

Andrea Piacquadio/Pexels

Day or night, many of us grind or clench our teeth, and don’t even realise we’re doing it. Here are three questions to ask yourself.

At least once a week, do you:

  • feel sore in your temple, face, jaw or near your ear?

  • have pain when you open your mouth or chew?

  • feel your jaw lock, click or become stuck?

If you answered “yes” at least once, you may be grinding or clenching your teeth (known as bruxism).

So why do we do it? And is there any way to stop? Let’s take a look.

What happens when you clench or grind?

Clenching or grinding your teeth is involuntary. We unconsciously activate our chewing muscles, tightening or thrusting the bottom jaw and clenching the teeth together or grinding them against one another.

Nearly one in six of us do this while sleeping, and one in four while awake.

Grinding your teeth while asleep makes a distinct noise. (If you share a bed, your partner might be able to tell you about it!)

The sound of teeth grinding is like nails scraping a board.

Is it bad for you?

Mild, occasional grinding or clenching isn’t usually a problem.

But if you do it often or very forcefully, this habit can cause many tooth, jaw joint and muscle issues, interrupt sleep, and contribute to tension headaches or ear pain.

These issues can become painful and be expensive to manage.

Over time, it can also fracture and crack your teeth.




Read more:
What happens to teeth as you age? And how can you extend the life of your smile?


Why do I clench or grind my teeth?

There is usually a mix of physical, mental and lifestyle factors.

You are more likely to clench and grind if you:

There is also a strong link with sleep apnoea, a condition which stops you breathing regularly while asleep and deprives your brain and body of oxygen.

Low oxygen triggers the release of stress hormones. These increase your heart rate and activate full body muscle spasms, which can also increase grinding and clenching.

Can my dentist tell from looking at my teeth?

Your dentist will usually review any health issues and medications. They may ask if you experience jaw pain, headaches, difficulty chewing or jaw locking. They may also ask about your sleep experience.

In your mouth, your dentist will look for teeth or fillings that have been chipped or worn down.

Teeth that are unusually worn down can also be a sign of acid reflux. This causes stomach acid to seep into the mouth, which softens the hard enamel that protects your tooth.

As a result, people who clench and grind their teeth and also suffer from reflux tend to chip and wear down their teeth a lot faster.

Another common sign is white ridges inside your cheeks and scallop-shaped indentations around your tongue. These are formed when the cheeks and tongue get caught against the teeth when you clench or grind them.

Other signs your dentist will look for include:

  • shrunken or receded gums

  • loose or wobbly teeth and

  • teeth that have moved away from their original position.

A dentist may be able to tell you are grinding or clenching by looking at your teeth.
Benyamin Bohlouli/Unsplash

What can I do about it?

Clenching and grinding your teeth is highly manageable. Your health practitioner can help you identify the causes and manage symptoms.

Your doctor can review your medications and investigate potential underlying issues, such as reflux, arthritis in the jaw or sleep apnoea.

You can also ask your doctor to assess you for sleep apnoea to see if you need a polysomnograph test.

This test is the gold standard used to diagnose sleep disorders, including clenching and grinding your teeth.

To check if the test is required, your doctor will ask questions about your sleep experience, fatigue levels and whether you fall asleep while doing everyday activities.

A physiotherapist who specialises in jaw pain can help with joint locking, clicking or tension headaches with a combination of tailored exercises and stretching.

Pain-relieving medication can also help.

Your dentist may recommend a night guard or occlusal splint to protect your teeth from wear, reduce muscle tension and jaw clicking. These are acrylic or nylon appliances custom-made to fit over the teeth in your top jaw – like a sports mouth guard, but smaller.

When these options don’t relieve symptoms, some people may consider botox injections to block the signals that control specific jaw muscle movement, reducing clenching and associated pain.

However, botox is expensive and not effective for everyone. It is also short-acting, so will require frequent visits to a neurologist or specially trained dentist.

The bottom line

If you think you’re clenching and grinding your teeth, speaking to your doctor or dentist is the best place to start.

But remember, physiotherapy, night guards and painkillers treat the consequences of clenching and grinding, not its causes.

So it’s also worth thinking about ways to reduce your stress and develop good sleep habits.

Some simple adjustments to relax and unwind – such as drinking less caffeine and alcohol and keeping devices out of the bedroom at night – may improve your health and help avoid pain and expensive treatments.

Arosha Weerakoon owns a dental practice. She is a member of the Australian Dental Association and a Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Dental Surgeons.

Amit Arora receives funding from the Australlian National Health and Medical Research Council and NSW Ministry of Health. He is a dental practitioner member (Teaching and Research) on the Dental Board of Australia.

ref. I think I’m grinding or clenching my teeth. Why? And can anything help? – https://theconversation.com/i-think-im-grinding-or-clenching-my-teeth-why-and-can-anything-help-270294

The yellow-legged hornet eradication is on track – but the next few months are crucial

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Phil Lester, Professor of Ecology and Entomology, Te Herenga Waka — Victoria University of Wellington

Jonathan Raa/Getty Images

New Zealand now has a genuine chance to stamp out one of the most damaging invasive insects to reach our shores: the Asian yellow-legged hornet.

But what happens over the next few months might just decide whether the species is eliminated or becomes established.

It has now been three months since the yellow-legged hornet was first detected in Auckland and the eradication response is showing real signs of progress.

So far, 43 queen hornets have been found and killed in Auckland. Each one represents a nest that would otherwise have produced thousands of voracious workers, capable of consuming huge numbers of insects, including key pollinators such as honey bees.

Worse still, by autumn those same nests would have produced thousands of new queens. That next generation would have dispersed widely, helping the hornet spread across much of New Zealand.

We only need to look to overseas experience to see what is at stake. In parts of Europe where the yellow-legged hornet has become established, losses of honey bee hives of 30% to 80% have been recorded. There have also been serious risks to people, with stings causing intense pain and swelling, and, in rare cases, severe allergic reactions that have proved fatal.

Encouragingly, the response led by the Ministry for Primary Industries appears to have been effective, with many nests located and destroyed.

And the contribution from the public has been extraordinary. Of the 43 nests discovered, 18 were from public notifications. More than 9,520 reports of suspected hornets have been submitted from across the country.

These reports have directly helped locate nests, which so far have all been found around Glenfield and Birkdale on Auckland’s North Shore.

This first phase of the eradication programme has achieved what we hoped. Early on, new nests were being discovered almost daily. The more that crews searched, the more they found.

Importantly, the response now appears to have reached a point where intensive searching no longer turns up new nests on a daily or weekly basis. That is encouraging, but it does not mean the job is done. For eradication to succeed, every last nest must be found and destroyed.

The next phase – and why it’s crucial

The next phase of the response, running through January and much of February, will mostly rely on trapping and tracking worker hornets.

Any surviving nests are likely to change behaviour. Queens and workers from early
“primary nests” typically relocate higher into nearby trees, forming larger “secondary nests” that are hard to find.

These nests can contain many thousands of workers and hungry larvae that need constant feeding.

From now on, hornet workers from any remaining nests will become more abundant and more visible. This is when public vigilance matters most.

Hornets may be attracted to beer, gardens, fruit trees and beehives. Setting traps, photographing suspicious insects, and submitting reports to MPI’s hotline will help us to find those nests and might make the difference between eradication success and failure.

Once hornet workers are discovered, their nest can be tracked. The search crews now have the equipment to capture and tie small radio-trackers to foraging workers.

When the hornet flies back to its nest, it unknowingly leads search crews straight to it, enabling entire colonies to be destroyed.

Later in February, before new queens and males are produced in autumn, the programme will enter its final phase: baiting with Vespex.

Vespex is a protein bait developed in New Zealand for controlling invasive Vespula wasps. It won a World Wildlife Fund Conservation Innovation Award in 2015 for its effectiveness in killing invasive wasps and protecting native ecosystems.

Wasps and hornet workers are attracted to Vespex and carry the bait back to their nests, where it eliminates the colony. Importantly, previous work has shown Vespex to be safe for pollinators such as honey bees.

I see Vespex as a vital safety net. It can be deployed cheaply over the area of infestation, helping to eliminate any small or cryptic nests that might otherwise be missed.

For eradication to work, we must get every last nest.

Keeping the momentum going

Biosecurity Minister Andrew Hoggard has committed $12 million to support the hornet eradication response through to June 2026. This level of funding is fantastic and should provide much needed resources.

For eradication to succeed, continued community involvement will be essential. Public reporting of sightings, the use and monitoring of traps, and vigilance by beekeepers – particularly around hive entrances where hornets may be hawking bees – all remain vital to locating any remaining nests.

Public support to date has been outstanding and has played a substantial role in the discovery of nests. Peoples’ contribution remains essential and arguably more important now than at any earlier stage of the response.

Clear guidance on identifying yellow-legged hornets, making traps and submitting sightings is available through the Ministry for Primary Industries.

We have a major opportunity to eradicate this species from New Zealand in 2026. The next few months will determine whether that opportunity is realised.

Phil Lester serves on the Technical Advisory Group for the Ministry for Primary Industries’ hornet response.

ref. The yellow-legged hornet eradication is on track – but the next few months are crucial – https://theconversation.com/the-yellow-legged-hornet-eradication-is-on-track-but-the-next-few-months-are-crucial-273696

Thinking of a tutor for your child? 5 things to consider first

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ben Zunica, Lecturer in Mathematics Education, University of Sydney

SolStock/ Getty Images

As the new school year approaches, many parents may be thinking about getting a tutor for their child.

Media reporting estimates one in six Australian students get tutoring at some point in their schooling, to help them catch up, qualify for specific schools or prepare for important exams.

But how should parents approach the task of finding a tutor? Our 2025 research highlighted the lack of national standards for tutor qualifications, safety practices and teaching quality. This means parents often have little guidance on choosing a provider they can trust. Unlike school teachers, anyone can call themselves a “tutor” in Australia.

Here are five considerations to help families make more informed, confident decisions about hiring a tutor.




Read more:
Private tutoring for school kids is ‘booming’. But this poses risks for students


1. Start with clear goals

Begin by talking to your child to get a shared understanding of what you and they hope tutoring will achieve. Also have a discussion with their classroom or subject teacher who can give advice on the focus, frequency and type of tutoring.

For some students, the goal may be improved performance on assessments. For others, the priority might be rebuilding confidence, strengthening maths or literacy skills, or developing an enjoyment of learning.

Then identify two or three measurable goals. This allows parents to monitor progress over time and hold tutors accountable.

Ask your tutor how they might go about achieving these goals to ensure everyone is on the same page.

It is important to review progress after a few months, and check in with the classroom teacher. If goals are not being met, the arrangement should be reconsidered. Effective tutoring should complement classroom learning and aim to make itself unnecessary over time.

2. Understand your budget and the support you need

Tutoring varies widely in format, cost and purpose.

One-to-one sessions can provide targeted support, but can be more expensive. Group settings may offer structure, peer motivation and reduced cost.

Families should also decide whether they prefer a qualified teacher or whether a university student or specialist tutor with relevant subject expertise can meet their needs.

For example, if your child needs help catching up, a tutor with a teaching qualification who understands the relevant curriculum and teaching methods might be best. If your child needs help with difficult homework questions, a university student may be OK.

Importantly, higher fees do not always guarantee higher quality tutoring. Parents should instead look to try and match up their goals, the tutor’s expertise and their household budget.

You also need to consider how many hours you want your child tutored each week. Evidence suggests shorter, high-quality targeted sessions are best.

3. Check safety and qualifications

Because the tutoring industry is sparsely regulated, parents need to make sure tutors are safe and appropriately skilled.

At a minimum, families should request a Working With Children Check or equivalent and evidence of relevant qualifications.

Relevant qualifications may include a teaching degree, subject-specific university studies or other credible training, for example, via the Australian Tutoring Association.

If your child is in early primary school, you should consider sitting in on the sessions or at least remaining close by.

4. Meet the tutor first

Parents should arrange a preliminary meeting with the tutor or tutoring centre before you commit.

This meeting can reveal whether the tutor’s communication style, expectations and learning environment are a good fit for the child. Parents should ask how the tutor assesses student needs, aligns instruction with the school curriculum, provides feedback, and handles homework or preparation requirements.

This meeting may also provide an opportunity to determine whether the tutor(s) foster a safe, supportive environment in which the child feels comfortable.

A reputable tutor should be happy to engage in these initial conversations free of charge.

5. Be aware of red flags

Red flags could include guarantees of rapid or dramatic results, requests for large up-front payments, or reluctance to explain teaching approaches and qualifications.

Also watch out for tutors who avoid communication with parents or schools, avoid discussing progress, or rely exclusively on worksheets and test drilling. This approach is unlikely to develop your child’s understanding.

High-quality tutors should be transparent about their methods, welcome questions, and view tutoring as a supportive complement to school learning rather than a replacement.

The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. Thinking of a tutor for your child? 5 things to consider first – https://theconversation.com/thinking-of-a-tutor-for-your-child-5-things-to-consider-first-271742

Uncanny, curious and awesome: an expert in psychology breaks down what we feel in the face of Ron Mueck’s sculptures

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Lisa A Williams, Associate Professor, School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney

Ron Mueck Woman with Sticks 2009 (detail), mixed media, 170 × 183 × 120 cm, Collection Fondation Cartier pour l’art contemporain, Paris, acquired 2013 © Ron Mueck, photo: museum Voorlinden, Wassenaar, the Netherlands, Antoine van Kaam

I recently experienced Ron Mueck: Encounter at the Art Gallery of New South Wales. I have no training in art appreciation or history, and I went with minimal prior knowledge about Mueck’s work or the pieces in the exhibit.

I had, however, heard his works are psychologically evocative. So I approached the experience with an open mind, and a social psychologist’s inquisitiveness.

If I had to choose three words to capture my naive experience, they would be uncanny, curious and awesome. I’ll explain.

Uncanny

The most dominant feature of my experience was a deep sense of uncanniness.

The uncanny valley is the point where the normally positive linear relationship between how human-like a robot is, and how familiar and likable it is, dissolves. Robots in the uncanny valley are perceived as creepy and eerie, and elicit repulsion instead of attraction.

Ron Mueck, Woman with Shopping, 2013 (detail), mixed media, 113 x 46 x 30 cm, Collection Thaddaeus Ropac.
© Ron Mueck, photo: Hauser & Wirth

The concept also applies to art. Many of Mueck’s works are uncanny. His sculptures are superbly realistic. The wrinkles at an elbow. The whites of the toenails. The curve of a nose.

But Mueck also plays with features that undermine realism, tipping into hyperrealism. Many pieces are too large, or too small, to actually be human. The viewer’s mind is trapped: how can the sculpture seem so real but also be so obviously not real?

Installation view of the Ron Mueck: Encounter exhibition, featuring Dark Place 2018, ZAMU, Amsterdam.
© Ron Mueck, photo © Art Gallery of New South Wales, Felicity Jenkins

My visceral reaction to Dark Place, a large 1.4 metre face of a man with a menacing expression, epitomises the uncanny valley. Just as soon as I stepped into the darkened viewing area, I backed away quickly, saying “nope!” (hopefully quietly) to myself. Yes, I knew he wasn’t real. But he felt so real. I was, he was, we were in the uncanny valley.

One explanation for the uncanny valley is “violated expectations” where a human replica seems real – but the realisation it’s not brings about a sense of unease.

At first glimpse, it wouldn’t be implausible that Ghost, a woman in a swimsuit leaning against a wall, would turn her head, push off the wall and walk away. But of course she can’t – she’s not real. Uncanny.

Ron Mueck Ghost 1998/2014, mixed media, 202 × 65 × 99 cm, YAGEO Foundation Collection, Taipei.
© Ron Mueck, photo: Alex Delfanne

Other explanations of the uncanny valley call on mind perception, whereby human mental capacities are attributed or denied to entities in the world. Human replicas such as artworks don’t have the capacity to think and feel as humans do – but are often depicted as being able to do so.

Mueck’s faces invite the viewer to contemplate what’s being thought or felt. A poignant example of this is Spooning Couple, featuring a couple in bed. The pair’s body positions are telling – including the man’s arm tucked at his chest rather than over his partner’s body, and the slight gap between them. But their contemplative faces present a depth of thought that is – without a better word – uncanny.

Ron Mueck, Spooning Couple 2005, edition 1/1, mixed media, 14 x 65 x 35 cm.
Collection Glenn and Amanda Fuhrman NY, image courtesy the FLAG Art Foundation

Based on all of this, you might surmise I didn’t enjoy the exhibit. But, esthetic experience is multidimensional. It wasn’t all eerie, aversive uncanniness.

Curious

Most notably, I experienced moments of acute curiosity, the emotional experience of wanting to fill a gap of the unknown.

Mueck’s work drives the audience to wonder why he made the decisions he did. This is perhaps most pronounced in Young Couple, which depicts a pair of adolescents standing next to one another. Intriguing even from the front, my curiosity was spiked on walking around the back and seeing the acute angle and tightness of their held hands.

Installation view of the Ron Mueck: Encounter exhibition, featuring Young Couple 2013, YAGEO Foundation Collection, Taipei.
© Ron Mueck, photo © Art Gallery of New South Wales, Felicity Jenkins

My reaction was instant: what is happening here? A moment of reproach? Conflict? Possession? There’s no way to know.

Other curious choices peppered the exhibit. The consistent flat-footedness of Mueck’s figures. The odd selection of non-humans included a chicken, dogs, a pig. The juxtaposition of solo statues and pairs of people with a large group of oversize growling dogs.

Installation view of the Ron Mueck: Encounter exhibition, featuring Havoc 2025, courtesy the artist and Thaddeus Ropac, London – Paris – Salzburg – Seoul – Milan.
© Ron Mueck, photo © Art Gallery of New South Wales, Anna Kucera

Unfulfilled curiosity can sometimes be frustrating. At the exhibit, though, sitting with the questions was satisfying. One point of art, it seems, is to raise more questions than answer them. In this, Mueck has succeeded.

Awesome

Rounding out the trio of characteristics of my experience is awe: the emotion experienced when we witness something outside our understanding, often vast or complex. The experience is wonder and amazement.

Mueck’s works dance in the space between possible and impossible, just beyond the line of comprehension. I lost count of how many times I thought in wonder, “How did he do that?”

It’s unfathomable to me that someone can create something so very lifelike and evocative. To consider the skill required to produce his pieces was a process of expanding my own mind.

Installation view of the Ron Mueck: Encounter exhibition, featuring Couple Under an Umbrella 2013, Giverny Capital Collection.
© Ron Mueck, photo © Art Gallery of New South Wales, Felicity Jenkins

Speaking now as a positive emotion researcher, I think the key to the impact of Encounter rests in what we know about the outcomes of experiencing awe.

This unique emotion shifts the way we think about the world, creating what’s been coined the “small self effect”. In awe, we feel smaller in relation to the world around us. This change in perspective is powerful. It prompts curiosity and critical thinking. Awe also drives a desire for social connection, a sense of satisfaction with life and generosity.

By evoking awe, Mueck is shifting the way people see and interact with their worlds. That is powerful indeed.

Ron Mueck: Encounter is at the Art Gallery of New South Wales until April 12.

Lisa A Williams has received funding from the Australian government (Australian Research Council; Department of Industry, Science, and Resources).

ref. Uncanny, curious and awesome: an expert in psychology breaks down what we feel in the face of Ron Mueck’s sculptures – https://theconversation.com/uncanny-curious-and-awesome-an-expert-in-psychology-breaks-down-what-we-feel-in-the-face-of-ron-muecks-sculptures-271830

Kiwis smashing it abroad: The best thing that happened to Christopher Yu was being made redundant

Source: Radio New Zealand

Across borders and industries, New Zealanders are carving out space, building influence and exporting creativity. In this series, RNZ speaks to Kiwis making their mark abroad, those coming home, and those living somewhere in between.

Before Christopher Yu became the co-founder of prestige fragrance houses Colour & Stripe and Ostens — whose clients include the Kardashians and Cate Blanchett — he helped build then-unknown French brand Diptyque into a global name.

Seven years after selling the business, Yu was still fielding calls from fashion royalty: Tom Ford, Karl Lagerfeld and Gucci, all asking for scented candles.

Christopher Yu.

Supplied

More confirmed yellow-legged hornet sightings, but still confined to North Shore

Source: Radio New Zealand

The sightings have so far been contained to the Glenfield and Birkdale areas. RNZ / Isra’a Emhail

The number of queen yellow-legged hornets found in Auckland this summer has reached 43.

Yellow-legged hornets (Vespa velutina), a pest hornet not known to be established in New Zealand, are considered a biosecurity concern, due to the potential impact on honeybee and wild bee populations.

Sightings, which started in late October, have so far been contained to the Glenfield and Birkdale areas on Auckland’s North Shore. 

Biosecurity Commissioner Mike Ingliss said help from the public had been “overwhelmingly positive”.

“We’ve had over 9770 notifications to date throughout the country, which allows us to focus our priority on where the confirmed sightings are, and we’ll continue to do that to eradicate the hornet.

“We’re urging Aucklanders to continue to be on the lookout for yellow-legged hornets or nests.”

Ingliss said, although they had received reports of possible sightings across the country, no sightings had been confirmed outside North Auckland.

He said many reports proved to be other species upon investigation. More than 500 registered beekeepers and apiaries were helping to search an 11km area.

“The focus is finding these queens, so they don’t hibernate over the winter period and then come back out next year.

“We’re in a good space, we’re confident in terms of resourcing.”

Thirty confirmed queen hornets were found with either developed nests or evidence of nesting. 

He encouraged people to continue reporting suspected sightings of the hornets or their nests, and to provide an exact location when making a report.

You can make reports:

  • By calling the exotic pest and disease hotline on 0800 809 966
  • By emailing info@mpi.govt.nz
  • Or online at report.mpi.govt.nz (select the ‘plants, spiders or insects’ option from the dropdown list).

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Invercargill councillors reject claims they failed former Mayor Tim Shadbolt

Source: Radio New Zealand

Partner Asha Dutt speaks at Sir Tim Shadbolt’s funeral.

Former Invercargill mayor Nobby Clark disputes claims made at Sir Tim Shadbolt’s funeral that his colleagues have blood on their hands.

Sir Tim’s partner, Asha Dutt, told mourners on Friday that his health turned due to the extreme stresses placed on him by people who should have had his back.

However, several councillors have questioned her account, saying Sir Tim was supported and had friends around the council table in his final term.

Dutt promised some parting shots, when she publicly farewelled her partner – and she did not hold back.

She described his final term as mayor – from 2019-22 – as truly awful and detailed accusations she promised Sir Tim she would raise, including that she believed the 2019 council had blood on their hands.

“It wasn’t Tim who ailed and wasn’t capable of doing his job,” she said. “It was the extreme stresses that were placed upon him by people that should have supported him that turned his health and turned my own.”

Mourners at Sir Tim Shadbolt’s funeral in Invercargill. Katie Todd

A tumultuous term was marked by talk of possible government intervention, after rising tensions between elected members and a 2020 review finding a leadership void and saying Sir Tim was increasingly unable to do his job.

At the time, Sir Tim said the report scapegoated him for the failings of council, which was not giving him enough support.

Dutt said his colleagues should be ashamed.

Former mayor and Sir Tim’s deputy, Nobby Clark, disagreed that the long-serving mayor lacked support.

“That’s not the truth at all,” he said. “He had failing health and that’s just the fact of it.

“Everybody in Invercargill knows that. He struggled through the last term, so you try and help.”

Former Invercargill Mayor Sir Tim Shadbolt. Otago Daily Times / Stephen Jaquiery

He believed most councillors supported him, and pointed to the findings of the 2020 independent Thomson report as evidence of the leadership issues they faced and the steps they sought to take.

“The comments she made were inaccurate,” Clark said. “It just showed that she was angry right til the very end, which is a shame, because Tim was not like that.

“Tim was a really nice guy and a pleasure to sit with. He was a great orator.”

He described Sir Tim as a man who commanded the attention of everyone when he walked into a room and really connected with others, particularly people who were disadvantaged.

Former councillor Peter Kett, who considered himself a true friend of Sir Tim, even before he became mayor, said Dutt’s words were hard to hear.

“I’m really gutted at what she said,” Kett said. “Some councillors had blood on their hands, but the way it sounded that all of us had blood on our hands, like myself, I just wanted to help him.”

Some councillors treated Sir Tim like rubbish, but he did have friends in the council chambers, he said.

Kett was disappointed to be painted with the same brush.

“Just so sad that she had to say that, because she knows that I’m a true friend of his and, when he went in to full time care, Asha gave me permission with the people at the rest home to go and visit Tim whenever I liked.”

He described seeing Sir Tim shuffle out of one difficult council meeting, before going into the mayoral lounge.

“He was crying and I put my arm around him. I said, ‘Tim, what can I do?’

“He said, ‘Oh, get me a sandwich or something’. I said, ‘There are some sandwiches and cakes in the committee room’.

“He said, ‘I’m not going back in there, would you bring me some food please?’, so I went and got him some food, asked him if he wanted a drink and then I drove him home.”

Kett laid the lack of support and stress at the feet of then-chief executive Clare Hadley, saying she regularly met with committee chairs and deputy chairs, and decisions were made in those meetings, before being taken to council.

In response, Hadley said she was happy to leave that term behind her and she had no comment.

Former councillor Graham Lewis said he was surprised and hurt by Dutt’s remarks.

She did not mention that several councillors tried to help Sir Tim through some of the council agendas before meetings or that he would drive him home after meetings, he said.

“Asha was obviously going through a lot of grief and a lot of upset,” Lewis said. “I’m not putting her down, I’ve got a lot of respect for her and also had huge amount of respect for Tim.

“That’s basically all I can say. It was troubling times.”

Former Invercargill mayor Nobby Clark insists Sir Tim still had support on the council. ODT/Supplied

Councillor Allan Arnold did not believe Sir Tim lacked support, but declined to describe his final term.

“It’s water under the bridge, as far as I’m concerned,” he said. “I have fond memories of Sir Tim personally.”

Councillor Ian Pottinger said his only comment was “de mortuis nil nisi bonum – do not speak ill of the dead”.

The Invercargill City Council said it did not wish to make any comment.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

PM Christopher Luxon says tariffs ‘not the way forward’ in dispute over Greenland

Source: Radio New Zealand

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon fronts media after his State of the Nation speech. RNZ / Calvin Samuel

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says “tariffs are not the way forward”, as the United States and the European Union go head to head over Greenland.

“We don’t want to see a downward spiral of tariffs and tit-for-tat tariffs, it’s just not acceptable” Luxon told media, after his State of the Nation speech on Monday.

Earlier this week, US President Donald Trump threatened eight European allies with a 10 percent additional tariff for opposing his plans to buy or annex Greenland.

The EU was reportedly considering retaliatory tariffs worth about 93 billion euros, the equivalent of about NZ$187 billion.

Luxon said it was in New Zealand’s interest to see a “healthy trans-Atlantic relationship in place”, through discussion, debate and dialogue.

“If the US has genuine concerns around Arctic security, we’ll have those conversations.”

He wouldn’t say whether it was appropriate for the EU to retaliate with tariffs.

“That’s a decision for them to make.”

His comments were the first time Luxon had spoken publicly about international events, following the summer break.

He said events in Iran were “incredibly concerning” and “worrying”.

“When you actually see a government using its own forces to kill its own citizens – utterly unacceptable.”

Luxon was also asked about the strike conducted by the United States on Venezuela, in which President Nicolas Maduro was captured.

He said he didn’t have “a lot of time for Nicolas Maduro” and the New Zealand government hadn’t recognised his government – “We saw it as illegitimate” – but he expected every country to be “compliant with international law”.

Ultimately, he said, it was “up to the US to demonstrate that they were compliant with international law”.

“That’s up to them to demonstrate that, as it is for every individual country, to say that they’re operating with an international law.”

Asked why he didn’t speak about the issue earlier, he said Foreign Minister Winston Peters summarised the situation “superbly well” in his statement.

“I didn’t need to add anything more to it.”

On Monday, Labour leader Chris Hipkins said the government could have been “more visible and more principled” on all those issues.

“Standing up for international laws [and] international rules is something New Zealand has taken very principled positions on in the past, and we should continue to do so.”

Labour condemned the US attack on Venezuela as a “breach of international law”.

Hipkins said he had “no time” for the previous government of Venezuela, “but going and effectively taking over a country with no international law behind you is a very, very big step for the United States to take”.

“For New Zealand to say nothing about that, I think, has been an abrogation of what has previously been a very principled foreign policy position by New Zealand.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

KiwiSaver or your house – which is likely to give better investment returns?

Source: Radio New Zealand

Other investments have been outperforming housing in recent years. (File photo) Unsplash/ Li Rezaei

Your KiwiSaver might have given you a better return than your house over the past 10 years, and experts say the same is probably true of the next 10.

Realestate.co.nz spokesperson Vanessa Williams said while people were often told house prices doubled every 10 years, that had not been the case in the decade since 2015 based on the site’s asking prices.

Between 2015 and 2025 New Zealand’s national average asking price increased by 55.1 percent, from $556,931 to $863,747.

Auckland experienced a 23.5 percent increase as average asking prices rose from $846,730 in 2015 to $1,045,328 in 2025.

By comparison, the NZX50 lifted 4.92 percent a year over the past 10 years on price alone, or 57.67 percent. Bitcoin rose 50,000 percent. Gold lifted more than 270 percent.

Morningstar said that in the 10 years to September, aggressive KiwiSaver funds as a group had returned an annualised 9.7 percent a year or a cumulative roughly 150 percent.

University of Auckland finance expert Gertjan Verdickt said it was not surprising to see other investments outperforming housing.

“If you look at the real returns of housing over the long term, after adjusting for taxes, quality… the return is positive but very low.

“On average, over the last few centuries, that return is around 2 percent to 3 percent per year. That is not bad but it’s definitely not as good as other asset classes, such as equities and bonds.

“The correlation with the equity market is also relatively large, so it offers modest diversification opportunities. Thus, housing is not a bad asset to have per se, but it’s generally overemphasised as ‘the holy grail’.”

Kernel Wealth founder Dean Anderson said shares had consistently outperformed property investment over long periods.

“That is not an unusual trend. It is actually almost an expected trend over the long term.”

A key difference for many investors is that they can borrow to invest in houses in a way that is generally not possible with other assets.

“The difference is obviously borrowing, but that is a double-edged sword,” Anderson said.

“And the leverage that comes from that can be quite negative, as some have experienced in recent years if there is a downturn. So I think the biggest warning for most investors It’s not just the mindset of thinking that property doubles every 10 years, but I think we’ve also started to realise that property is also not just a guaranteed bet.”

He said different regions, suburbs and types of houses could also perform differently.

“It is actually still common for property values to fall. which I think is the more important awareness now.

“Not only have we assumed that property doubles every seven to 10 years, we’ve also typically had this mindset of thinking that it also only goes up.”

Anderson said KiwiSaver was many people’s biggest asset outside their homes. It would not be unreasonable for someone in a growth fund to get better returns from that than their property, he said.

“I think it’s going to be really interesting to see the appeal of property from an investment perspective going forward as KiwiSaver balances get bigger, as people become more aware of other things they can invest in – not just property, but in shares, in digital assets, and that the returns of those other assets have been as strong or stronger… I think we’re becoming more educated.”

He said there would also be a wealth transfer over the next ten years as older generations sold their investments.

“New Zealand has a disproportionately large amount of our wealth, particularly by baby boomers and others, tied up in residential profit investment. Now, a lot of those holders of property, either to fund retirement or, as part of, inheritance wealth transfer. are potentially going to be looking to sell those assets. And you’ve got a lot of people now into that retirement stage where the rental income and costs maybe not funding the lifestyle that they need and are slowly liquidating some of those assets.

“So I suspect that we’ll actually see an increase in supply over the next 10 years, not only from growth of new builds, but also the vast majority of current holders looking to realise a return from those properties and create liquid cash flow.”

He said that could help avoid the sorts of surges in house prices seen in past decades.

Realestate.co.nz said some parts of the country did double in price over 10 years. Gisborne was up 145.5 percent, Manawatu-Whanganui 121.5 percent and the central North Island up 119.2 percent.

Cotality chief property economist Kelvin Davidson said the idea of doubling each decade had always been quite general. “Even during boom phases, depending on which particular 10-year period you choose, there might not have necessarily been 100 percent growth.”

He said it was not “magic” and had to be driven by underlying factors. Interest rates trending down, a relatively favourable tax system, tight land supply and a shift to two-income households had all pushed prices up. These factors were likely to have less impact in future, he said,

“It looks like the tax rules will change at some point, I don’t know when, I don’t know what they might be, but there is a growing appetite for a tax system that’s perhaps a little bit less favorable for property, you know, obviously capital gains tax is on the radar right now, but there could be other things as well.”

Government moves to free up land could also help keep prices lower, he said.

“Whatever you think is the natural growth rate, historically it’s probably been 6 or 7 percent over the long run, I think there’s every reason why that would be lower in future, maybe four or five. House prices will still double if you give them long enough but that period of time will be longer than it’s been in the past.”

Sign up for Money with Susan Edmunds, a weekly newsletter covering all the things that affect how we make, spend and invest money.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Most UPNG students don’t want independence for Bougainville, new survey shows

ANALYSIS: By Anna Kapil and Stephen Howes

It is well known that the people of Bougainville want independence. In the 2019 referendum, 98.3 percent of them voted for it.

And in 2025, Ishmael Touroma, a strong advocate of independence, was re-elected to the position of President of the Autonomous Region of Bougainville, further confirmation of the widespread support for independence among the people of Bougainville.

But what do the people of PNG think about Bougainville independence? Much less is known about this. As a start, we included a question about Bougainville independence in the 2025 annual survey of University of Papua New Guinea (UPNG) students.

When asking the question, we reminded the students we surveyed of the strong support in Bougainville for independence, and told them that, as mentioned above, “in a recent referendum, an overwhelming majority (98.31 percent) of voters in Bougainville chose to have full independence from PNG over greater autonomy.”

We then asked the students to consider this outcome when selecting from one of four options that we presented to them.

They could say that Bougainville should be granted full independence, that it should remain in PNG with greater autonomy, that they oppose any changes in Bougainville’s current status, or that they were unsure.

Only 27 percent of the 389 School of Business and Public Policy students who took the survey supported full independence. The majority, 59 percent said that Bougainville should remain part of PNG but with greater autonomy. Of the balance, 11 percent said they were unsure and 3 percent said that they supported no change in the current status.

Opposition to independence was widespread across all four regions of PNG, but was slightly stronger among students from the Momase and Highlands regions, and lower among students from the Islands and Southern regions.

However, these differences are not statistically significant. Even in the Islands region, which might be expected to be more sympathetic to Bougainville independence, a majority of students were in fact opposed.

The most supportive was the Southern region, but even there 51 percent of students were opposed to independence.

Female students were slightly more supportive of independence (25 percent male vs 30 percent female). Male students were more likely to support greater autonomy (62 percent vs 52 percent) and women were more likely to be unsure (15 percent vs 9 percent). Again these differences were not statistically significant.

In summary, this survey of some almost 400 UPNG students found widespread opposition to Bougainville independence. We want to stress that we are not endorsing these views, nor criticising them. We are just reporting them.

The opposition we find among students is probably reflective of views more generally in PNG, at least among the elite, and might help explain why PNG’s political leaders are dragging their feet on the issue if not “fundamentally opposed” to independence.

Few, such as the former prime minister Peter O’Neill, have come out openly to express their opposition to independence. But few, such as the late Morobe Premier Luther Wenge, have been openly supportive either.

There seems to be a general reluctance among PNG’s political leadership to respond to the 2019 referendum result, much to the frustration of Bougainville’s political leadership.

On the one hand, it seems that no-one wants a confrontation. On the other, PNG’s political leadership, like UPNG’s student body, doesn’t seem to find the 2019 referendum result a convincing reason to support the cause of Bougainville independence.

If our survey is anything to go by, the PNG elite is willing to compromise (to allow Bougainville greater autonomy) but not to support its break away from the nation.

If Bougainville wants independence, it will have to do more to win hearts and minds in the rest of PNG. Our survey shows that it is not enough to simply reiterate the overwhelming support that independence has within Bougainville.

The students were explicitly reminded of this and still only one-quarter supported independence. If Bougainville is to succeed in its independence aspirations, it will need to do more to convince PNG’s elite, or at least its future elite, why it should be allowed to break away.

Anna Kapil is a Lecturer at the University of Papua New Guinea. She completed a Master of International and Development Economics at the Australian National University. Anna was a Greg Taylor Scholar at the Development Policy Centre.

Dr Stephen Howes is director of the Development Policy Centre and professor of economics at the Crawford School of Public Policy at the Australian National University.

For other findings from the 2025 survey, see this article series and the 2025 PNG Update presentation. The results of the first survey, conducted in 2024, are reported here. Statistical significance was judged using the Chi-square test. Republished from the DevPolicy blog under Creative Commons.

Article by AsiaPacificReport.nz

View from The Hill: Liberals tick off deal on hate crime measures

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

While federal parliament devoted Monday to emotion-filled Bondi condolence speeches, behind the scenes government and opposition inched to a deal to pass on Tuesday Labor’s fall-back measures relating to hate.

Late Monday, the Liberal Party room ticked off on the agreement.

The legislation will be introduced into parliament on Tuesday morning and put through both houses in a day. The measures will facilitate the banning of organisations that promote racial hatred, as well as enabling the refusal or cancellation of visas on the basis of hate-motivated conduct.

The deal is a parachute for both Anthony Albanese and Sussan Ley, who have each been criticised as they faced off in an impasse over the government’s earlier, now split, omnibus bill.

While everything is being undesirably rushed – illustrated by the fact the report of a parliamentary inquiry into the measures was not expected to be tabled until Tuesday – both sides on Monday were anxious for a quick settlement.

The government, after having to scrap the anti-vilification part of its original package, wanted to deliver what was left of its measures at this special parliamentary sitting. The opposition was aware of the risk of looking hypocritical if it were to oppose everything.

The changes obtained in the negotiations include:

  • strengthening aggravated offences so all extremist preachers and leaders, including visiting speakers, are captured by the law

  • strengthening the role of parliament in examining these powers, including by inserting mandatory two year reviews by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security to ensure new powers are effective, proportionate and accountable

  • making the Prohibited Hate Groups Listing Framework more targeted to those most dangerous hate groups seeking to incite violence

  • requiring consultation with the Leader of the Opposition on both the listing and delisting of extremist organisations, strengthening the bipartisan approaching to national security

  • closing gaps in hate crime definitions so Commonwealth offences are properly covered, and

  • ensuring migration powers are used decisively to remove extremists who threaten community safety.

The broad changes the opposition wanted went through Sunday’s shadow cabinet meeting.

The Nationals were still examining the detailed outcome on Monday evening.

Nationals leader David Littleproud told the ABC’s 7.30 program the Nationals wanted to make sure the proposed ban on hate groups did not contain any “overreach”. “We are trying to do that as quickly and carefully as we can,” he said.

Albanese and Ley met early Monday. The opposition put forward changes it sought, which the government took away to consider.

The opposition is set to vote against the package’s gun reform measures but these are assured of passage with the support of the Greens.

Nationals Senate Leader Bridget McKenzie said in a statement the Nationals would oppose “unfair gun laws which will punish law abiding Australian firearms owners for the actions of Islamic extremists”.

By Monday afternoon, the detail of the measure relating to banning organisations appeared the main issue being finessed.

Opposition home affairs spokesman Jonno Duniam said it was “excellent” that the government at the weekend ditched the racial vilification provision in its original package. “They were unworkable and the cost, the potential impacts on freedom of speech, were not worth contemplating in the rushed process we’re going through.”

But, asked whether the government should go back to an anti-vilification measure, given the special envoy to combat antisemitism Jillian Segal recommended it, Duniam told Sky the government “should consider bringing it back and indeed go through a proper process”.

Crossbencher Allegra Spender said, “I am deeply disappointed that our parliamentarians have not been able to unite around anti-vilification legislation. We have heard a lot of speeches today about pushing out hatred and extremism, but our MPs haven’t yet been able to unite around a practical way of achieving that vision.”

Victorian Labor MP Josh Burns, who is Jewish, said: “I know that there would be people inside the Coalition right now who would be deeply uncomfortable with their position on the racial vilification and serious vilification clauses that should have been in this bill.

“I genuinely hope that there’s no incidents and that no one has to deal with this. And if that’s the case, and we can all walk away and we’ve got enough done. Well, so be it. But I fear that that may not be the case,” he said.

Michelle Grattan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. View from The Hill: Liberals tick off deal on hate crime measures – https://theconversation.com/view-from-the-hill-liberals-tick-off-deal-on-hate-crime-measures-272435

One year into Trump’s second term – repressive US president on track to join world’s worst press freedom predators

After winning re-election in 2024, Donald Trump promised to be a dictator “on day one”.

When it comes to press freedom, he has kept his word, extending the war on the press he launched while running for his first term with grave attacks on access to reliable information worldwide.

Reporters Without Borders (RSF), which monitors “press freedom predators” worldwide, has compiled a timeline of his administration’s assaults on the media in the past year and warns that he risks sinking to the levels of authoritarian regimes.

President Trump’s hostility towards the media predates his return to the White House in 2025. For the past 10 years, he has labelled journalists and media outlets he disagrees with as “the enemy of the people” and “fake news”.

His attacks coincide with a broader decline in the news media’s public esteem: according to Gallup, only 28 percent of Americans have a “great deal” or “fair amount” of trust in the media.

In his second term in office, though, Trump has matched his history of violent rhetoric with a series of concrete actions that have severely damaged freedom of the press in the United States and around the world.

In the past 12 months, he has censored government data, dismantled America’s public broadcasters, weaponised independent government agencies to punish media that criticise his actions, halted aid funding for media freedom internationally, sued disfavored outlets, applied pressure to install cronies to lead others, and more

These actions echo the anti-press measures of the ruthless dictators in the “political” category of the 2025 Press Freedom Predators List, such as President Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Similar alarming levels
RSF is concerned that Trump’s increasingly authoritarian tactics could eventually descend to similarly alarming levels.

The Press Freedom Predators List exposes systemic attempts to silence the free press by highlighting actors who wield an outsized, harmful influence on press freedom in five categories: political, security, legal, economic and social.

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Brendan Carr has already made the 2025 list in the “legal” category, while Trump-aligned tech mogul Elon Musk was featured in the “economic” category.

January: the explosive start to Trump’s second term
January 7 – In an early example of a company prematurely complying with Trump’s threats, Meta guts its fact-checking programme. CEO Mark Zuckerberg and several other Big Tech executives attend Trump’s inauguration soon thereafter.

January 20 – Trump issues an executive order “ending federal censorship,” effectively eliminating government monitoring of misinformation and disinformation.

January 22 – FCC Chairman Brendan Carr reinstates previously dismissed licensing complaints against three major US television broadcasters, ABC, CBS, and NBC,for their 2024 election coverage, but declines to reinstate a similar complaint against Trump-friendly cable outlet Fox News.

January 29 – Carr launches a full investigation into public media networks PBS and NPR, complementing political efforts to cut their federal funding.

January 24 – Trump freezes almost all foreign aid, dismantling the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and cutting more than $268 million allocated by Congress to support media freedom worldwide. Independent news outlets around the world are thrown into chaos.

February: sanctions and censorship
February 3 – The Trump administration takes down thousands of US government pages covering information ranging from vaccines to climate change.

February 6 – Trump issues sanctions against International Criminal Court officials in retaliation for their investigation into war crimes committed by Israeli forces in Gaza, including attacks against hundreds of journalists.

February 8 – Trump demands a $20 billion settlement from CBS over the network’s editing of an interview with his election opponent, former Vice President Kamala Harris.

February 11 – The White House bars Associated Press reporters from covering White House events in retaliation for their refusal to adopt Trump’s preferred name for the Gulf of Mexico.

February 21 – The Trump administration lays off workers responsible for handling FOIA requests for information, creating barriers for reporters’ access to vital data.

February 25 – The White House announces major changes to the White House press pool and declares it will be choosing who is allowed to attend press briefings.

March: US public broadcasters gutted
March 14 – Trump issues a decree dismantling the US Agency for Global Media, which oversees the allocation of funds to US public broadcasters Voice of America (VOA), Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), the Middle East Broadcast Networks (MBN), Radio and Television Marti,  and Radio Free Asia (RFA). RSF soon files a lawsuit to save VOA.

March 14 – Trump baselessly accuses the news media of “illegal behavior” in a speech widely seen as encouraging the Department of Justice to target Trump’s perceived enemies in the media.

March 15 – The Trump administration places all Voice of America (VOA) personnel on administrative leave, stopping virtually all news production.

April: more cuts to public media
April 13 – Trump begins to punish law firms taking pro bonowork he doesn’t agree with, including the protection of journalists.

April 15 – The Trump administration announces that it plans to cut funding for NPR and PBS.

April 25 – The Justice Department rescinds a policy that prevented reporters’ phone records from being searched.

May: Pentagon access limited
May 13 – All wire service reporters are barred from Air Force One during Trump’s trip to the Middle East.

May 15 – Over 500 VOA employees receive termination notices, despite a court order injunction won by RSF and co-plaintiffs including VOA journalists and their unions.

May 24 – Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth limits access for credentialed press within the Pentagon, hindering vital reporting on the country’s defence headquarters.

June: police violence against reporters
June 3 – USAGM senior advisor Kari Lake lays out plans to cut more than 900 employees from the USAGM workforce.

June 8 – Trump sends the National Guard to Los Angeles following protests over immigration raids.

June 14 – Journalist Mario Guevara is detained while reporting on immigration raids in Atlanta, Georgia. Though the charges against him are dropped and he is ordered released, local police transfer him to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which begins deportation proceedings against him, despite his legal work status.

July: Trump critic taken off air
July 11 – Judge issues a temporary injunction against the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) for using excessive force. Since June 6, at least 70 attacks against journalists have been reported.

July 18The Late Show with Stephen Colbert is not renewed after the late night host Colbert criticises the settlement between CBS’ parent company Paramount and President Trump, casting a pall over the network’s political independence.

July 19 – Trump sues the Wall Street Journal for its report on his ties to disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

August: restrictions for foreign journalists
August 8 – The Department of Homeland Security proposes severe restrictions to visas for foreign journalists in the US.

August 26 – Trump-appointed ambassador to Türkiye Tom Barrack tells Lebanese reporters to “act civilised” and accuses them of being “animalistic” when they ask him questions.

September: crackdown fueled by death of Charlie Kirk
September 17 – In another dangerous precedent for censorship, ABC pulls late-night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel off the air after pressure from FCC Chairman Brendan Carr over Kimmel’s comments on Republican politicians’ reaction to Charlie Kirk’s death.

September 19 – The Department of Defence requires reporters to sign an unconstitutional oath pledging to only publish information “authorised for public release,” prompting the vast majority of the Pentagon press pool to walk out en masse.

September 28 – Reporter Asal Rezaei has a pepper ball shot through her car window outside an ICE facility in Broadview, Illinois. ICE agents also pointed their guns at journalists, and several other reporters were hit by pepper balls in the following days.

September 29 – YouTube, one of the largest sources of news for Americans, agrees to pay $24.5 million to settle a lawsuit with Trump after his social media accounts were suspended following the January 6, 2021 insurrection.

September 30 – An ICE agent assaults two journalists outside an immigration court in New York City. One of them, L. Vural Elibo from Turkish outlet Anadolu, is hospitalised.

October: journalist deported after months behind bars
October 3 –  Mario Guevara is deported to El Salvador after more than 100 days in ICE custody.

October 17 – Trump refiles a defamation lawsuit against the New York Times for its reporting on the 2024 election.

October 18 – LAPD officers attack journalists at No Kings Protest in direct violation of an injunction issued in July.

October 28 – Reporters are barred from covering an immigration hearing in Maryland. Journalists’ ability to access immigration proceedings are hindered due to a government shutdown.

October 31 – The Trump administration restricts media access in the West Wing of the White House, barring reporters from a second-floor area known as “Upper Press,” traditionally open to reporters and White House communications staff.

November: new government website created to smear media outlets
November 10 – Trump threatens to sue the BBC over its editing of footage from the insurrection instigated by pro-Trump supporters on January 6, 2021.

November 17 – The State Department announces new restrictions and press pass rules for journalists attempting to enter the Harry S. Truman building.

November 18 – Trump dismisses the 2018 murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi and defends Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Muhammed bin Salman.

November 18 – Trump shouts “Quiet, piggy!” at Bloomberg journalist Catherine Lucey, one of several personal attacks he lobs at multiple women reporters throughout November and into the early days of December.

November 28 – The Trump administration launches a “Hall of Shame” webpage targeting various media outlets and encourages citizens to submit complaints to a White House-run tip line targeting journalists.

December: a court defied
December 2 – Trump announces he will close overseas VOA offices, contradicting a judge’s return-to-work order from April.

December 10 – Trump inserts himself into the potential merger of Warner Bros. Discovery, Paramount and Netflix, pressuring for the sale of news channel CNN.

December 20 – CBS editor-in-chief Bari Weiss pulls a story about deportation from the programme 60 Minutes, sparking backlash over the politicisation of the network.

First published by RSF on 14 January 2026. Republished by Pacific Media Watch.

Article by AsiaPacificReport.nz

Seatbelt injuries reveal truth behind Nelson crash that injured pregnant woman

Source: Radio New Zealand

Seatbelt wounds revealed the real culprit in the Nelson crash last October. Photo / 123RF

A drunk and disqualified driver who crashed and flipped his faulty car with his pregnant partner in the passenger seat tried to say she was behind the wheel at the time.

However, bruises from the seatbelt injuries found on Adam Michael Hubac and the woman revealed the truth – he had been behind the wheel and not her, Judge Tony Snell said.

Hubac was sentenced to 150 hours of community work in the Nelson District Court and disqualified from driving for a year on charges that included careless use of a vehicle causing injury, driving while disqualified and driving with excess breath alcohol, after the crash last October in the Lee Valley, south of Nelson.

Hubac was also sentenced on cannabis charges, after police found utensils and a small amount of cannabis in the car.

Judge Snell said, in essence, Hubac had driven drunk while disqualified, knowing there was a problem with the power-steering in his car.

He also left the scene after the crash, but it was accepted that he was seeking emergency help for his partner, who was 28 weeks pregnant at the time and was injured.

The court heard Hubac was disqualified from driving for six months last May, on a charge of driving with excess breath alcohol.

However, on the afternoon of 9 October last year, he and his partner were travelling on Lee Valley Rd, when Hubac rounded a corner, lost control and hit a bank, which caused the vehicle to overturn and land on its roof.

Police said Hubac went to Richmond, some distance away, seeking help. Police then identified him as a disqualified driver and a breath test revealed he was over the limit, with a breath alcohol level of 545 micrograms of alcohol per litre of breath.

At the scene, police found evidence of Hubac’s illicit drug use, including a bong and 2g of cannabis plant.

Hubac told police he knew he was a disqualified driver and initially told them he had not been driving, but police quickly found from the pair’s seatbelt injuries that this was not the case.

His partner received a large cut, which required stitches, and suffered shoulder injuries.

Judge Snell noted Hubac’s “modest” history of offending on dishonesty and cannabis matters dating back to 2013, and then further offending in 2019, including an assault matter and drink-driving.

In the recent offending, Hubac should not have been driving, because he was disqualified, and knew there was a problem with the car, which made the drink-drive matter worse, Judge Snell said.

From a starting point of 200 hours’ community work, Hubac was sentenced to 150 hours, after his early guilty pleas, and was disqualified from driving for 12 months.

This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Body found on rocks on Auckland’s North Shore by member of public

Source: Radio New Zealand

The body was found near Gilberd Place in Torbay. RNZ / Richard Tindiller

A member of the public has found a body on rocks on Auckland’s North Shore.

Police said the body was found near Gilberd Place in Torbay shortly before 4pm Monday.

An investigation into how the person died was now underway, a spokesperson said, and the death was being treated as unexplained.

A scene examination took place on Monday afternoon.

Police said they would provide further information, when they were in a position to do so.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Life after the ‘Big 4’: are tennis’ modern stars cutting through like they used to?

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Robert Joseph Gill, Associate Professor in Media and Communication, Swinburne University of Technology, Swinburne University of Technology

Tennis’ four Grand Slams (the Australian, French and United States Opens, as well as England’s Wimbledon tournament) attract millions of spectators and billions of viewers each year.

Melbourne’s Australian Open kicked off on Sunday and more than 1.2 million people are expected through the gates this year, with a global media audience of 2.2 billion viewers.

As the sport has evolved, fans have gravitated to vibrant personalities alongside incredible sporting spectacles.

Since the commercial media networks began to broadcast these major events, the marketing and branding opportunity for players has boomed.

Once, the greats of the sport were household names. Is this still the case?

The power of greatness

Through the 1970s and 80s, tennis introduced the world to some remarkable players and rivalries, including Jimmy Connors, John McEnroe, Bjorn Borg, Billie Jean King, Martina Navratilova and Chris Evert, to name a few.

These players developed rockstar status with the press and public.

More recently, sport fans have been spoilt with the quality of tennis and intense rivalry that existed between the “Big 4” men’s champions (Novak Djokovic, Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and to a lesser extent, Andy Murray) and the flamboyant Williams sisters (Serena and Venus) in women’s tennis.

Only Djokovic is still regularly playing, although Venus Williams ended a three-year hiatus thanks to an Australian Open wildcard but was beaten in the first round on Sunday.

The Big 4 developed in the early 2000s when the rising talents of Djokovic, Federer, Nadal and Murray began an intense rivalry.

From 2003 to 2025, the quartet won a combined 69 Grand Slam titles from a possible 91 majors.

They also became celebrities far beyond the tennis court.

Individual athletes rely on their own character and skills to market themselves, as opposed to the combined image for a team.

The Big 4 had personality to burn, shaped by their on-court exploits. Each had their own authentic demeanour which they used for endorsements, sponsorships and business opportunities.

During the same period, women’s tennis was dominated by the Williams sisters: Venus (who won seven Grand Slam singles titles) and Serena (23 titles).

They were regarded as trailblazers for the empowerment of Black female athletes. Outside of tennis, both have enjoyed successful business enterprises.

What separates the Williams sisters from other women’s tennis stars was their willingness to take risks backed up by a powerful and aggressive game style. This won the sisters enormous respect and a huge fan base. The crowds also seemed to enjoy their iconic playing outfits.

When these champions were dominating on the court, they were worldwide celebrities and their impact resonated with many non or casual sports fans.

But since their retirements, there has been a void. In fact it’s safe to suggest only the most hardcore tennis fan could name the top handful of male and female players for the Australian Open.

There’s no denying the number one and two men’s seeds, Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner, have built up an incredible rivalry. Amazingly, they played each other in the final of all eight majors during 2024-2025, with each winning four.

But would the casual fan be aware of their blossoming greatness, like they did during the emergence of Federer and Nadal?

A similar question can be asked in the women’s draw despite the star power of current number one Aryna Sabalenka and Iga Swiatek, Coco Gauff and Mirra Andreeva.

The modern media landscape

Tennis has grown significantly since the 2000s and players have come to prominence from across the globe.

The rise of social and digital media has led to increased promotion and publicity.

Brand control through direct digital communication with fans can bypass traditional media gatekeepers.

This may be the reason why many modern professional athletes have less of a traditional media presence – they are happy to connect directly to fans via social media.

Despite these emerging opportunities, it’s the old champs who still rule the roost online, with Serena Williams, Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, Naomi Osaka and Maria Sharapova considered to be the most powerful social media influencers.

What can we put it down to?

When the Big 4 and the Williams sisters were dominating on the court, tennis was often the talk around the office coffee room. Often, casual fans were even part of the conversation.

Their appeal and popularity might have been the result of a golden era of tennis as the sport’s global appeal spiked.

Perhaps the sporting world is still warming to the new era. Maybe modern players are more comfortable seeking to reach their fans through their own controlled platforms.

Possibly, the answer is longevity. The Big 4 and the Williams sisters built their fan base for close to two decades – today’s stars might just be getting started.

The Conversation

Robert Joseph Gill does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. Life after the ‘Big 4’: are tennis’ modern stars cutting through like they used to? – https://theconversation.com/life-after-the-big-4-are-tennis-modern-stars-cutting-through-like-they-used-to-273350

Council of Trade Unions survey shows incomes not keeping up with cost of living

Source: Radio New Zealand

Council of Trade Unions’ annual Mood of the Workforce survey showed incomes are falling even more behind on the cost of living. RNZ

A major union-backed survey shows more workers reporting their incomes are not keeping up with the cost of living.

The Council of Trade Unions’ annual Mood of the Workforce survey showed nearly 60 percent of the more than 3000 surveyed saying their income had fallen behind the cost of living, compared to nearly 50 percent last year.

CTU president Sandra Grey said workers were not coping.

“People are saying if their car breaks down ‘we’re in real trouble, we won’t be able to get to work, and we won’t be able to afford to fix it,’” Grey said.

“People are also saying ‘I can’t afford decent food for my children’ — so this is really dire.”

Grey said she had “no doubt” workers were struggling in the economic environment due to job losses and the cost of living.

On workplace health and safety, just over 70 percent felt they were able to have a say on the issue, while 29 percent did not.

Some haven’t received a pay rise in five years

The survey showed union members were more likely to receive annual pay rises.

Of those who received a pay rise in the past year, nearly 50 percent were members, while 42 percent of were non-members.

However, the survey also showed some workers had not received a pay increase in more than five years.

Of those who had not received an increase in that period, 10 percent were non-union members, and just over 3 percent were union members.

“That is absolutely staggering,” Grey said, referring to those who had not received a pay increase in five years.

“How do you go an pay for your groceries if you haven’t had a pay rise in five years? How do you make sure you can give your kids the shoes and the coats they need when it comes up to winter,” she said.

Grey said the reality was for some workers, both things were becoming harder.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Man dead after drowning near Coromandel beach

Source: Radio New Zealand

WESTPAC RESCUE HELICOPTERS

One person has died following a water-related incident in Hahei this afternoon.

At around 3.15pm on Monday, Police were alerted to a man in need of assistance in the water near Tutaritari Road.

One helicopter, one ambulance and a first response unit was dispatched to the scene.

The man was located in the water and was taken ashore in a critical condition.

Sadly, despite best efforts by emergency services, the man died at the scene.

Enquiries into the incident are ongoing.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Basketball: Steven Adams injured in Rockets win

Source: Radio New Zealand

Steven Adams has a sprained ankle. AFP

New Zealand basketballer Steven Adams could be set for another injury lay-off in the NBA after falling heavily in the Houston Rockets’ 119-110 win over the New Orleans Pelicans.

On Monday, the Rockets centre sprained his left ankle in the fourth quarter while attempting to block a Zion Williamson layup.

Adams had to be helped from the court by medical staff as he could not stand unassisted.

Adams had come into the starting five against the Pelicans as a replacement for Tari Eason who as out with an ankle injury.

Rockets head coach Ime Udoka gave a brief update on the New Zealander’s condition post-game.

“Nothing broken, not a high ankle sprain, not sure about anything as far as time wise but quite a bit of swelling and pain and obviously couldn’t put much weight on it,” Udoka said.

Before being helped off the court in Houston Adams had scored five points, had 10 rebounds and 2 assists in 27 minutes.

The 32-year-old has been an important player for the Rockets this season and is averaging 5.9 points and 8.6 boards across 22.7 minutes in 31 games.

Adams has had injury trouble before, he missed a few games earlier this season with a right ankle injury and missed the entire 2023-24 season with a knee injury.

The Rockets have a 25 win 15 loss record this season and are fifth in the Western Conference.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand