Page 18

100 critically endangered Mahoenui giant wētā released into Taranaki’s Rotokare Sanctuary

Source: Radio New Zealand

About 100 critically-endangered Mahoenui giant weta have been released into the Rotokare Sanctuary in Taranaki this week as part of efforts to preserve the taonga species. Supplied / Adrian Cleary

About 100 critically endangered Mahoenui giant wētā have been released into the Rotokare Sanctuary in Taranaki this week as part of efforts to preserve the taonga species.

Despite being one of the world’s largest insects – females weigh in at about 25 grams and are about the size of a mouse – the “gentle giants” are vulnerable to mammalian predators.

First discovered during the 1960s in remnant tawa forest at Mahoenui in the King Country – from which it takes its name – the ingenious wētā was later found taking refuge in gorse.

Department of Conservation (DOC) Mahoenui giant wētā technical advisory group leader, Amanda Haigh, said the wētā had come up with a cunning plan to defeat their predators.

“What was an accident of a piece of hill country that had some goats in it, some gorse left to go wild, these wētā moved in and because gorse was so dense and they could hide in it and it meant the rats and the mice couldn’t climb in and eat them. It created this little haven for them.”

DOC’s Amanda Haigh walks a weta into the release point. RNZ / Robin Martin

But unfortunately that plan had come unstuck.

“What has been happening in about the last 10 years is we’ve had a massive decline in the population and the habitat is changing and the predators are starting to take hold, so what we’ve been doing is starting to do translocations to get new populations established in other places and spread the risk.”

Landcare Reseach Manaaki Whenua scientist and Mahoenui giant wētā expert Corrine Watts said there was no denying the insects were large, but that wasn’t all that was special about them.

Mahoenui expert Corinne Watts was the only person to handle the larger weta during their release. Supplied / Adrian Cleary

“Females are about the size of a mouse. They range between 20 and 25 grams. The males are smaller, maybe 18-20 grams.

“But what’s really amazing about the Mahoenui giant wētā compared to other giant wētā that we have in New Zealand is they have two colour morphs, so you can get a very dark brown colour morph and almost like a speckled yellow colour and that’s quite different among giant wētā.”

Efforts to translocate Mahoenui giant wētā had proven difficult and populations have only survived in predator-free environments similar to Rotokare at Sanctuary Mountain Maungatautari, Mahurangi Island off the Coromandel and on private land at Warrenheip, near Cambridge.

Mahoenui giant weta expert Corinne Watts was the designated weta handler at the release. RNZ / Robin Martin

Watts was the designated handler for the four larger wētā released at Rotokare.

She had no qualms about handling the wētā which were almost the size of her hand.

“The feel cold and so quite often they’ll sit on your hand to gain warmth from your hand because they’re cold-blooded, so they feel cold.

“And they are not going to try and jump too much because something that big could really hurt themselves, so I just think of them as gentle giants really.”

Watts said she’d never been bitten by a giant wētā.

Conservation manager at Rotokare Fiona Gordon said the translocation had been years in the planning.

“When we first started the conversation there were so few individuals in the Waikato reserve itself that a wild to wild translocation didn’t really seem feasible and has now been made possible thanks to the captive breeding programme at the Otorohanga Kiwi House, so we’re immensely grateful for their support and the work that’s gone into preparing those individuals that are able to be here today.”

Rotokare Senic Sanctuary conservation manager Fiona Gordon. RNZ / Robin Martin

Gordon said the majority of the wētā being released were three-quarters of the way to be adults.

“A couple of them are a little bit bigger, so they’ll be being released directly into trees and hopefully in years to come we’ll be encountering them across the forest but that won’t be for a few years.”

Otorohanga Kiwi House wētā keeper Danielle Lloyd had a soft spot for the creatures and it was a bittersweet moment to see them released.

“They all have their own little personality. I know they’re just insects to most people, but because I spend almost everyday with them I learn all of their little ticks and what makes them go and what makes them happy.

“They’re just awesome creatures. If you look at their little faces they’re actually quite cute. They do have spiky legs and they can look a bit scary, but if you actually give them a chance they’re great.”

Otorohanga Kiwi House weta handler, Danielle Lloyd explains how the juvenile weta would be release in bamboo tubes. RNZ / Robin Martin

Marina Rauputu – in whose gorse bushes the wētā were discovered in Waikato – accompanied Mōkau Ki Runga hapu members for the handover to Rotokare manuwhenua Ngāti Tupaia.

It was a full circle moment for her.

“It’s very special because I’m from Taranaki. I’m from Whakamara where my grandparents settled, so in a way it’s like a merging of not just the wētā but almost like two iwi coming together at this one spot at Rotokare and it’s like coming home for me.”

Marina Rauputu once owned the land where the giant weta were found thriving in gorse. RNZ / Robin Martin

Mahoenui giant wētā are tree-dwelling omnivores with a lifecycle of about two years. Females lay eggs in the ground at about 100 a time.

The Rotokare Scenic Sanctuary release was the first of many planned for the predator-fenced sanctuary with the aim of establishing a permanent Mahoenui giant wētā population.

Mahoenui giant wētā are tree-dwelling omnivores with a life cycle of about two years. Supplied / Adrian Cleary

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Why convicted drug smuggler Karel Šroubek still hasn’t been deported

Source: Radio New Zealand

Karel Šroubek does not want to be deported back to the Czech Republic. (File photo) Carmen Bird Photography

  • Šroubek, also known as Jan Antolik, is still in New Zealand seven years after then Immigration Minister Iain Lees-Galloway ordered his deportation
  • He used a false passport, smuggled in drugs and has been in New Zealand for 22 years
  • He has lost an appeal to judicially review the decision, after a tribunal ruled against him

Analysis: “This will go to court. It will be tied up for years. I don’t think we’ve heard the last of Karel Šroubek by any measure.”

That’s how National MP Michael Woodhouse summed the 2018 debacle in which the drug-smuggling kickboxer was on the cusp of being deported, then granted residence and then facing deportation again – all in the space of 10 weeks.

The Court of Appeal has now rejected Karel Šroubek’s latest attempt to avoid being sent back to the Czech Republic.

But in keeping with the pitch and sway of his storied existence, there may still be avenues which he could go down to stay in New Zealand.

His case hit the headlines in 2018 when former immigration minister, Iain Lees-Galloway, was asked whether to deport him – and instead granted him residence.

That was despite his jail time (five years, nine months in 2016 for importing nearly 5kg of MDMA) and being wanted by Czech police.

An image released of Karel Šroubek by Interpol. (File photo) Supplied / Interpol

The long-running saga began more than 20 years ago, when Šroubek used an alias and forged passport of fellow kickboxer Jan Antolik to visit New Zealand in 2003.

That was because under his real name, he was wanted for assault in a fatal shooting in Prague. Also unbeknownst to authorities he had not yet served a (four-and-a-half-year) jail sentence for assaulting two police officers and a taxi driver in 1999.

Four years after arriving in New Zealand, he was given police diversion for possession of a knife and, in 2008 and 2009, he faced charges of assault, but was subsequently acquitted.

Meanwhile, Šroubek had been granted residence in 2008, under his false Antolik name.

That fraud was eventually discovered, and in 2011, he was found guilty at trial of possessing a false passport and giving false information.

Why is he still here?

He told the court he had no convictions in the Czech Republic and that he was genuinely fearful of returning there.

The judge granted him a discharge without conviction – meaning he could avoid authorities attempts to deport him – unaware that between 2007 and 2009, Šroubek had returned to his homeland on three separate occasions.

In September 2014, Šroubek was charged with the drugs offences that landed him in jail and made him liable for deportation. In 2018 he appealed to then immigration minister, Iain Lees-Galloway.

Former Immigration Minister Iain Lees-Galloway. (File photo) RNZ / Dom Thomas

The minister took less than an hour to not only reverse the deportation order, but to also grant him residence in his real name. It emerged the minister knew of his Czech convictions when he made his decision.

He “urgently reviewed” the residence approval when a political firestorm erupted, and Šroubek once again faced deportation – this time because the government judged him as an “excluded person”, whose visa was granted in error.

Further adding to the murky decision-making were claims Šroubek’s then wife had engineered the revelations through National Party MPs during the couple’s marital breakdown.

Enter the lawyers

Meanwhile, Czech authorities tried to extradite him. Šroubek’s previous immigration lawyer Simon Laurent told RNZ the deportation could be challenged in court as abuse of process or double jeopardy as the minister knew of the pertinent information when he made his first decision.

The case had been inching its way through multiple tribunal and court appeals in the intervening years, partly because of Covid-related delays.

In January 2023 Šroubek filed an application for judicial review in the High Court at Auckland of the deportation decision and the tribunal rulings.

But he was barred from appealing part of the decision because of statutory time limits, and took that fight to the Court of Appeal.

That legal argument played out in March this year, and the decision to dismiss his appeal came out on Monday.

In 2018, former immigration minister Michael Woodhouse said the minister had left the government vulnerable to a legal challenge that “Mr Šroubek’s lawyers will drive a bus through”. His suggestion the case would be tied up in court for years are as prescient now as they were accurate then.

The judicial review may leave Šroubek with only the chance of a legal challenge to argue that he has ‘exceptional’ humanitarian grounds to remain here.

With so many twists and turns so far, it does not seem likely Šroubek’s fated story in New Zealand will come to a quick end. It may not even be the beginning of the end.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Justice Committee recommends passing Electoral Amendment Bill with some amendments

Source: Radio New Zealand

Parliament’s Justice Committee has recommended the Electoral Amendment Bill be passed by majority, but suggested some amendments. RNZ / Nate McKinnon

Parliament’s Justice Committee has released its report into the Electoral Amendment Bill.

The select committee recommended the bill be passed by majority, but suggested some amendments.

The bill would prevent same-day enrolments, establishing a deadline of 13 days before election day for people to enrol or update their details.

It would also ban prisoners from voting, and tighten up the rules around treating. Postal requirements for voting will also be removed.

The bill had its first reading in July.

The committee proposed “transitional arrangements” for prisoner voting, so that disqualification would only apply to all prisoners detained for a sentence of three years or more, and prisoners sentenced to less than three years whose relevant offence occurred after the bill’s commencement.

This, the committee said, would address situations where someone sentenced to less than three years’ offence may have been committed at a time when the law did not disqualify them.

The bill also allows for the introduction of automatic enrolment updates, so the Electoral Commission can update someone’s address directly following a data match.

The committee proposed amending the bill so the Electoral Commission needs to notify that person their address would be updated.

It also proposed an amendment so Electoral Commission could remove someone’s name from the dormant role and register them as an elector, if it is satisfied they should be registered.

In its differing view on the bill, Labour said the government’s suggestion the bill was necessary to improve the timeliness, efficiency, integrity, and resilience of elections was “a fiction” and the bill would role back one of the most accessible voting systems in the world.

“Much of this legislation has the effect of suppressing voting. We are deeply concerned that many people will be unable to vote at the next election and either be refused access to the ballot box, or have their vote disallowed because they did not appropriately update their enrolment before voting commenced. If this occurs there is a real risk that the legitimacy of the outcome of the election will be undermined.”

The Green Party also considered it “concerning” that the flexibility would be removed.

“Voting habits for life are formed during these formative years so if our election settings are permissive of the busyness and chaos of everyday life, particularly for young people, this will have flow-on, lifelong effects.”

The Greens also opposed the prisoner voting ban in the strongest possible terms.

“When a person is sentenced to a term of imprisonment, they relinquish their freedom of movement. People in custody do not relinquish their human rights, nor their civic rights, or any set of rights besides freedom of movement.”

Te Pāti Māori also opposed the bill, claiming it would “rig” the next election in the government’s favour.

“This bill will disproportionately impact our rangatahi, Māori, Pasifika, and Asian communities, and a majority of the disenfranchised voters would not support any of the government parties.”

Te Tai Tonga MP Tākuta Ferris said the expansion of treating offences was “criminalising tikanga” and the earlier enrolment deadline “ignores the lived realities of Māori voters”.

In July, Attorney-General Judith Collins found the bill to be inconsistent with the Bill of Rights Act, and indicated 100,000 or more people could be directly or indirectly disenfranchised by the rules banning enrolment in the final 13 days before an election.

Collins also found the blanket disqualification from registration for people in prison would disenfranchise people who had a right to vote, and could not be justified.

The government, however, is pressing ahead, with the Prime Minister and Justice Minister both of the view that being a member of society comes with rights and responsibilities.

The committee received 2738 written submissions on the bill, from 2708 submitters.

The Ministry of Justice found 80.2 percent of submitters opposed the bill, with 0.5 percent supporting it.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Labour gathers for AGM as it shifts into campaign mode

Source: Radio New Zealand

Labour leader Chris Hipkins. (File photo) RNZ / Mark Papalii

Labour leader Chris Hipkins says he’s confident his party has changed enough since the 2023 election to win next year’s contest.

Speaking to RNZ before Labour’s annual general meeting in Auckland on Friday night, Hipkins said the party was shifting from reviewing policy to campaign mode.

“The focus for us now is to really get onto a campaign footing. We’ve been consolidating after the last election, we’ve been reviewing all our policy.

“We’re largely through that process now and so now we’re really getting onto a campaign footing and getting ready to win the election next year.”

The party went back to the policy drawing board after voters emphatically voted it out off the back of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Roughly one year out from next year’s election, Labour had so far presented the electorate with a pared back policy platform.

It includes a New Zealand Future Fund, a gaming rebate and a capital gains tax to fund three free GP visits and cervical screening.

This time last year, Hipkins told Labour’s membership the electorate had voted for change in 2023, and the party would have to change to win it back.

“The policy announcements that we’ve made already are very different from the sorts of things we were talking about in government last time,” he said this week.

Casting his mind back to 2023, Hipkins said he had laid down his conditions on staying on as leader just four days after the bruising election result.

“I said to the team pretty clearly, if you want me to stay as the leader, one of the conditions for that is going to be that we are going to work cohesively together as a team and I will be focused on making sure that happens, and that’s exactly what has happened.”

Hipkins successfully pitched its long-awaited capital gains tax in October, though he was pushed to do so earlier than planned after details were leaked to RNZ.

It was hardly the start the party would have wanted for such a contentious policy, though Hipkins said the idea seemed to have landed well.

“We worked through the capital gains tax policy very, very carefully to make sure that what we were putting before the electorate was something that people could understand the need for and they could understand how it would work and it’s landed very well with the New Zealand public.

“Our work on the three free doctors visits, similarly, went through a very thorough process so that we could be confident that we could deliver on that commitment.”

Labour’s policy platform as it stood was one big bottom line for the party, he said.

“These are things that we will deliver on in government,” he said.

Labour has capitalised on voter disillusionment with the coalition, leading National on the cost of living, health, the economy and housing in the latest IPSOS Issues Monitor survey.

However on current polling numbers it couldn’t go it alone and would need the support of the Greens and Te Pāti Māori

Hipkins had been keeping the Māori Party at arms length ever since internal ructions began and had since laid out his party’s intention to contest all of the Māori seats.

“I think Te Pāti Māori has got themselves into a world of difficulty. They’re not in any fit shape to play a constructive role in the current Parliament, much less a future government.

“And that’s one of the reasons that we’re going to be out there to win every one of those Māori seats back at the next election. I know Māori voters want a change of government at the next election, and my message to them is, voting Labour guarantees you a change of government.”

Voters would have to wait until next year to learn more about Labour’s policy platform heading into the election, with only small fry ideas to come in 2025.

“There’s a little bit more to come. They’re not major announcements but they will colour in a few of the blanks for people,” Hipkins said.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Smokefree choking

Source: Radio New Zealand

“If you match a tobacco cigarette in a joint in terms of the same size and smoked in the same way, cannabis results in five times higher levels of carbon monoxide” – physician and academic Richard Beasley. Elsa Olofsson

New Zealand was once a world leader in getting people to give up cigarettes, but we seem to have pulled up the brakes

In 34 days we hit the deadline for our world-leading ambitions to get our smoking rate down to less than five percent of the population.

To reach that Smokefree 2025 target we need 120,000 people to quit smoking pretty much immediately.

“That’s about 63,000 Māori, 21,000 Pasifika, 35,000 Europeans needed to quit,” says Chris Bullen, Auckland University public health professor and a leading researcher in the smokefree Aotearoa sector.

We’re not going to make it, but have we failed?

It depends on who you are, says Bullen.

“It’s come down and spectacularly so for certain populations,” he says.

Pākehā women living in high income suburbs have already reached the goal – that demographic is well below five percent.

For Māori it is three times the five percent target, Pasifika smokers are double the desired number.

Today, The Detail looks at why we missed the goal, the impact of this government’s removal of smokefree protections introduced by the previous Labour government under the Smokefree Action Plan, and what is next in the tobacco control battle.

When Smokefree 2025 was launched around 2011/2012 after a recommendation from the Māori Affairs Selection Committee, around 16.4 percent of adult New Zealanders smoked.

The latest figures from the annual NZ Health Survey show that figure is now 6.8 percent, similar to the previous year but down from 11.9 percent in 2019/20.

Some say we should celebrate what we’ve achieved, and they rubbish the latest rankings in the Global Tobacco Industry Interference Index, which has seen us plummet from second to 53rd place.

But dig into the numbers and they reveal deep inequities with Māori smoking rates at 15 percent and Pasifika at 10.3 percent.

“It’s an absolute failure and I think the present government’s been particularly bad in doing it,” says Anaru Waa, associate professor at Otago University based in Wellington. His research focuses on how we can eliminate tobacco-related harm among whānau Māori.

He’d like to see our Smokefree aim shifted out to 2030, and for it to be not just smoke-free but nicotine-free, because of all the new nicotine products on the market.

Bullen says the launch of Smokefree 2025 around 13 years ago was a breakthrough.

“It was an important lesson for me was that setting goals and targets can be very powerful,” says Bullen. “But it was also a lesson in that it seemed so far away, that for politicians on a three-year electoral cycle it was somebody else’s issue to grapple with.”

“So I guess they thought they’d just get a free ride because smoking was going out of fashion and by 2025 it would be a thing of the past. Of course it’s not.”

Bullen says there’s been cross party support for the idea and ongoing tobacco tax increases and regulations such as smokefree cars and indoor spaces all add up to incremental changes.

“But it was not until Ayesha Verrell (former Labour Health Minister) took up the cause and said 2025 is almost upon us, we need to do something. And that’s where the action plan was promoted and became law, very briefly, until it was repealed when the coalition government took power.”

Labour’s Smokefree 2025 Action Plan included three key measures; banning the sale of cigarettes to anyone born after 2009, slashing the number of tobacco retailers and cutting 95 percent of the nicotine from cigarettes.

But before the measures came into force the legislation supporting them was repealed by the Coalition Government.

Bullen says the policy was supported by the majority of New Zealanders in polling and by the vast majority of healthcare professionals. The repeal mobilised protestors with placards to the streets.

He says the repeal cannot entirely be blamed for the failure to hit the Smokefree target across the population but it sent a subtle message to smokers, “to say, you know our foot’s gone off the accelerator pedal, maybe it’s not so bad”.

The removal of targets for GPs and hospitals to give brief advice and support to people to quit smoking, also had an impact.

“Different governments do these things for various other reasons but that has had a measurable decline in the number of referrals coming to smoking cessation services from GPs.

“The whole system has to work together and I don’t think we’ve had a co ordinated, focussed system that’s really messaged loudly that we have got a goal as a nation and it’s something we can do collectively to support each other to get to that goal. That voice hasn’t been shouted loudly enough.”

The associate health minister Casey Costello has defended the government’s policies and called the Smokefree target ‘ambitious’. She has pointed to the latest figures that show that smoking among young people is below 3.2 percent as the best news.

“That’s exactly what we wanted our young people to see. We wanted our young people not to start,” she has said.

But Anaru Waa says New Zealand’s policies are not keeping up with the new products that are constantly being developed by the tobacco industry designed to hook young people.

“Nicotine drinks, nicotine gummy bears, you name it, just shove nicotine in it and you’ve got a hooked population.

“These aren’t nicotine replacement therapies with low nicotine ….. nicotine is a very highly addictive drug and the industries are awfully good at making it palatable and easy to get addicted to very quickly, then you tend to have the addiction for life.”

He says to achieve the Smokefree goal the measures that were scrapped by this government need to be returned but he also wants strict policies to extend further to products including vapes, with the ultimate aim of shutting out the tobacco industry.

“For some people who can’t quit it (vaping) might be an alternative but we also know that most of the people taking up vapes are youth and young adults and a lot of them have never smoked at all.

“These are the new generation of people using nicotine products and I’m thinking in 20 or 30 years time they’ll wonder why they were thrown under the bus at a time we could have prevented that.”

Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here.

You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

An acre full of colourful Christmas lights, extravagant animations

Source: Radio New Zealand

“It’s dead Christmas,” Carl Yates says. Around him, a graveyard of sleeping elves, reindeer and toy soldiers lay still.

‘twas eerily quiet at Shands Road when RNZ visited. Not a creature was stirring, not even a mouse.

Tangles of wires wound their way between model carnival rides, above them rows of thousands of fairy lights hung dull and lifeless.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Principals stunned no tally kept of schools testing positive for asbestos from coloured play sand

Source: Radio New Zealand

The latest coloured sand products to be recalled over asbestos fears. Supplied

The lack of a full and proper tally of how many schools are testing positive for asbestos from coloured play sand has stunned principals and a teachers union.

Initially, RNZ was told by the Ministry of Education that no count was being kept.

It was later able to provide what it said were incomplete figures after its minister, Erica Stanford, said a tally was being kept by the ministry.

Nine schools or early learning services have so far returned positive asbestos tests, while 39 have returned negative results.

Results for another 129 are either not known, or still being waited on.

The Ministry of Education cautioned the figures were based on voluntary reporting and therefore “should not be taken as a full picture”.

“Schools and early learning services are not required to report testing or share results with the ministry, as their immediate priority is keeping students, children and staff safe,” operations and integration leader Sean Teddy said.

But others said a complete picture was exactly what was needed and that there should be a full and official tally.

“This is shocking, it really confounds me that the ministry has not got more of a handle on this situation,” Principals’ Federation president Leanne Otene said.

“The guidance has been ambiguous and it has made it really difficult for schools to respond consistently and confidently,” she said.

Principals’ Federation president Leanne Otene. Supplied

She said principals have acted with appropriate caution and prioritised health and safety when commissioning testing at their own cost.

“But that has not been alongside clear, consistent messaging from the Ministry of Education,” Otene said.

“I am absolutely blown away that we have not been given more direct guidance on ensuring that we keep adequate records of when we have sent any product in to be tested, and the results of those tests, and we have not been asked to write incident reports that can be then presented to the ministry, to be put into our school boards’ meetings so that in 30 years, in 20 years, in 10 years there’s a record of action that that school took in relation to the advice and guidance and the results of those tests.

“I’m really concerned that there is no advice around that,” Otene said.

Trying to find how many schools have tested positive

RNZ asked ministries and the agency involved in the ongoing play sand recalls for overall numbers on how many schools and early learning centres had got tests.

It also asked for how many positive results had been returned.

WorkSafe said it did not hold information on test results in educational facilities.

“The Ministry of Education is best placed to advise how many schools or early childhood centres are responding or actions taken,” it said.

The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment had a similar response.

“This responsibility would sit with Ministry of Education,” it said.

The Ministry of Education initially said no count was being kept.

“We are not keeping a register of the number of tests commissioned by schools or early learning services, nor have we requested to be advised of the results of the tests they may commission,” it said.

RNZ then asked Education Minister Erica Stanford about her ministry not keeping a record of positive results.

“My expectation is that’s exactly what the ministry is doing. They have been out in the regions with all of their regional managers contacting every single school and I have been getting daily updates on which schools have it, which ones are open, which ones are closed, which ones need cleaning, so we have all that data and it is my expectation that the ministry is holding it and tracking it,” she said.

Education Minister Erica Stanford. RNZ / Mark Papalii

When RNZ said the ministry had said there was no register, the minister said, “Well, I’ve got that information so I’ll be happy to give it to you.”

Stanford’s office then referred RNZ back to the Ministry of Education, which earlier said there was no central register.

It was then that it was able to provide the figures on the information it had, warning it was incomplete and not a full picture because it was based on voluntary reporting.

Why is a count of positive tests important?

Terri-Ann Berry is an associate professor at AUT and also board chairperson of the Mesothelioma Support and Asbestos Awareness Trust.

She said having a central register was important, and the lack of one was very concerning.

“We can’t undo what has already happened unfortunately, but what we can do now is we can start looking at providing good evidence so that if anything in the future does happen, if anybody does develop any symptoms, that we can actually have good notes and reporting to be able to get ACC funding to help with any treatment,” she said.

Berry said there was no understanding at the moment of how likely it was that children have inhaled the fibres.

“I really think it’s important that we do actually find a way to bring a list together, there really should be some action plan to my mind where we’ve got systematic testing so that we actually know what the situation is and it doesn’t just rely necessarily on the voluntary test,” she said.

“All that tells you is that nine schools have got a positive result, and those parents are probably understandably worried, but what about all the other schools? Just because there is no result doesn’t mean that there isn’t a contamination, so no I don’t think the voluntary system is enough in this circumstance.”

Stephanie Mills, the NZEI national secretary, was also critical of a voluntary approach to reporting.

“It is a failure of regulatory systems, and so it is not good enough to take a voluntary approach when we are dealing with asbestos which is a banned substance, which causes long term illness to people, to which we’re now exposing children and teachers and other educators,” she said.

“I don’t think we have seen a responsible enough approach from government centrally, and what we now need is to know more but we also need to put in place steps so that this does not happen again.”

Coloured sand recalls now at five

Another children’s sand product was recalled on Thursday, the MIKI Sand Art Set, of which 570 were sold in 2023 between July and December.

According to MBIE, it is supplied by Australia-based Sax International.

The ministry said testing had found unidentified mineral fibres that were consistent with asbestos.

The other products with recalls were the Rainbow Sand Art Toy, the 380g Craft Sand, the 14-piece Sand Castle Building Set and Blue, Green and Pink Magic Sand from Kmart, and Rainbow Sand and Creatistics products.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Erebus victim’s daughter furious memorial will be in Christchurch instead of Auckland

Source: Radio New Zealand

The koru on the tail of Air New Zealand Flight TE901 at the site of the Mount Erebus crash. Colin Monteith / Antarctica New Zealand Pictorial Collection

The daughter of one of the victims of the Erebus disaster is disgusted that a memorial will be built in Christchurch.

It has been 46 years since the Air New Zealand scenic flight crashed into Mt Erebus in Antarctica, killing 237 passengers and 20 crew.

After decades of back and forth, the government has announced a memorial would be erected at Cracroft Reserve in Christchurch.

Simone Bennett, whose father David was one of the crash victims, lives in Auckland and is furious that the memorial will be so far away.

The government has announced a memorial will be erected at Cracroft Reserve in Christchurch. RNZ / Samantha Gee

However, the Air Line Pilots’ Association (NZALPA) is thrilled the memorial is finally being built, and in Christchurch.

The preferred site for the memorial is Cracroft Reserve, but the Avon riverbank is being held as an alternative option.

Andrew McKeen, a 787 pilot and president of the association, said the long-awaited memorial would finally honour victims of New Zealand’s worst aviation disaster.

“Christchurch serves as New Zealand’s gateway to Antarctica and was the intended stopover point for TE901’s return to Auckland,” he said in a statement.

“Since the tragedy many of our members have retired or passed on. Others still remember the turbulent months that followed that day in 1979 and the efforts NZALPA made to defend the professional reputations of their colleagues from unfair conjecture and blame.”

McKeen reiterated that Captain Jim Collins and First Officer Greg Cassin had been cleared by a Royal Commission of any suggestion that negligence contributed to the disaster.

“We will now have a permanent national memorial. Erebus will forever be remembered by our industry and especially our members.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Study discovers wells containing 40,000-year-old groundwater, warns of taking too much water

Source: Radio New Zealand

Programme co-lead Uwe Morgenstern sampling a spring. Supplied / Earth Sciences New Zealand

A world-first study of New Zealand’s aquifers reveals that some wells contain groundwater that is 40,000 years old with scientists warning they’ll be put at risk if too much water is taken.

Earth Sciences New Zealand has developed a series of maps and models identifying the source and flow patterns of our aquifers and large river catchments, as part of a six-year research programme.

It’s found that groundwater provides 40 percent of our drinking water, and has discovered that more than 80 percent of the water flowing through our rivers, streams and wetlands when it’s not raining, is from aquifers.

“That is far, far more than we previously thought and underlines the importance of the inter-connected management of groundwater and surface water if we want to ensure our streams continue,” said Principal Scientist Catherine Moore.

The median age of groundwater in the Heretaunga Plains Aquifer at a depth of 20-30 metres. Supplied / Earth Sciences New Zealand

Earth Sciences New Zealand developed the innovative National Groundwater Age Map from more than 1000 groundwater samples to give an overview of groundwater age and groundwater/surface water interaction across the country.

It found that most wells contain water between one and 100 years old.

However, some deep wells in the Taranaki and Marlborough regions hold water that’s over 40,000 years old because it takes so long for surface moisture to seep down into the aquifer.

“The danger is if it takes a long time to replenish we are at risk of taking too much water too quickly. Where water is very old we need to take less water and also look for where water is younger and take water from those areas,” said Moore.

The programme uncovered new insights about connection between groundwater and surface water. Supplied / Earth Sciences New Zealand

Areas such as the Wairau, which had the youngest groundwater – taking only two weeks to move through the aquifer system. However the scientists warned that this also presented a challenge as younger systems could be vulnerable to contamination from live pathogens and nitrate loads, whereas older water presented a challenge with nitrate contamination potentially taking decades to work its way through the aquifer.

“Knowledge of water age and flow rates is important for managing potential contamination of drinking water. We’ve created a drinking water protection zone guideline to help protect wells

from pathogens in the fast-flowing groundwater found in some of our aquifer systems, such as the Heretaunga Plains,” said programme co-lead and principal scientist Uwe Morgenstern.

The Heretaunga Plains were used as a case study for the modelling, as the Paritua Stream at Bridge Pa in Hawke’s Bay dried up in 2021. Community spokesperson Robert Turner said the stream levels had been declining for years and it’s made it harder for iwi to collect mahinga kai.

“We lost a lot of our kokopu. Eels were stuck in holes. If you look at it in Māori eyes, our river is calling for help,” said Turner.

More than 1000 groundwater samples were analysed to develop the National Groundwater Age Map. Supplied / Earth Sciences New Zealand

To understand why it ran dry, the project team gathered historical evidence, including inforamtion around the 1931 Napier earthquake, land clearances, gravel extraction, surface water diversions adn irrigation.

And what they found was a surpirse, as the strongest influence on the flow of Paritua Stream was actually rainfall – not groundwater from the nearby Ngaruroro River as previously thought.

Catherine Moore said that’s given scientists ideas for how to help the stream.

“A wetland restoration engineered a certain way, or directly putting water into the stream, would be sufficient to get that stream to flow if the rate at which that was done was high enough,” she said.

The Te Whakaheke o Te Wai team worked closely with mana whenua in the Heretaunga Plains to understand community concerns about groundwater in the region. Supplied / Earth Sciences New Zealand

The newly created National Groundwater Model was expected to cut costs for councils, by giving them quicker access to data that could inform decisions around how much water can safely be taken, and from where.

The interactive map includes data such as geology and soil characteristics, climate, surface water hydrology, groundwater levels, and groundwater age. It can zoom in from national to regional to local scales and can be used to test different scenarios.

“These tools allow decision-makers to build models more cost-effectively, so that they can answer environmental management questions more quickly, wherever they are needed,” said Moore.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

17,000 healthworkers strike for the second time in a month

Source: Radio New Zealand

Protesters in the ‘mega strike’ in Hamilton, October 2025. Libby Kirkby-McLeod / RNZ

  • Mental health and public health nurses, allied health workers and policy staff will strike from 1pm to 5pm
  • Hospitals and mental health units remain open, but some clinics and home visits cancelled
  • PSA accuses Health NZ and the government of failing to deal with under-staffing and under-resourcing
  • Health Minister calls on management to improve recruitment timeframes for frontline clinical roles

About 17,000 healthworkers are striking today for the second time in a month after mediation failed between the Public Service Association and Health NZ.

Meanwhile, nurses and senior doctors remain locked in their own long-running disputes, as the upheaval in the health sector appears set to continue to be a giant headache for the government heading into election year.

PSA national secretary Fleur Fitzsimons said the government needed to “enable Health NZ to come to the table with a fair pay offer” for members, including allied health staff, policy specialists, mental health and public health nurses and healthcare assistants.

“So far all of the offers are taking us backwards and don’t represent the safe staffing levels that we know hospitals need,” she said.

“This strike represents a frustration with the inability of the government and Health NZ to properly staff our hospitals and offer a pay increase that keeps pace with the cost of living.

“These workers are striking reluctantly in support of the public health system they want for New Zealanders.”

Patient safety the priority – Health NZ

Health NZ executive national director, people & culture and health & safety, Robyn Shearer, said she could reassure the public that plans were in place to ensure the continued delivery of hospital and community health services during the strike.

“Patient safety will remain our priority throughout the strike.”

Hospitals, emergency departments, crisis and acute mental health services and most community services would remain open, but some “routine” clinics and home visits would be cancelled.

Anyone with a hospital or community appointment should attend unless they were contacted directly to reschedule.

“Looking forward we believe further bargaining is the best way forward to resolve outstanding issues.”

Health minister wants HNZ to cut red tape – while unions appeal to PM

Health Minister Simeon Brown. RNZ / Mark Papalii

Meanwhile, Health Minister Simeon Brown has called on Health NZ to “rapidly devolve decision-making” to its four regions and 20 districts.

In his publicly released [https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/2025-11/health-nz-letter-of-expectations-27-11-2025.pdf

letter of expectations] to Health NZ, he said that included “removing unnecessary bureaucracy and improving recruitment timeframes for frontline clinical roles”.

However, all the major health sector unions – including the PSA, the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists and the Nurses Organisation – have signed a joint letter to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon urging him to help resolve impasses with their respective collective bargaining.

Together with public sector unions representing teachers, principals, firefighters, home support workers and 111 emergency dispatchers, they said workers were frustrated with the lack of progress at a time when the demand on their frontline services was increasing.

NZNO chief executive Paul Goulter said there was “a concerning common approach to bargaining from the coalition government”.

“For this reason, we believe it is appropriate for Prime Minister Christopher Luxon to step in and meet with workforce representatives to explore ways forward and settlement options.”

More than 100,000 essential workers held strikes throughout the country last month.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Wellington’s Transmission Gully to close for southbound traffic over weekend, while trains replaced by buses

Source: Radio New Zealand

Transmission Gully will be closed over the weekend. (File photo) RNZ / Charlie Dreaver

The transport network between Wellington and the Kāpiti Coast will be under some pressure this weekend with State Highway 1 Transmission Gully closed to southbound traffic, and Metlink trains being replaced by buses.

NZTA would close the southbound side of Transmission Gully after it postponed its closure last week while it revised its roadworks and traffic plan.

The revision came after an earlier closure on Transmission Gully caused significant congestion and delays.

NZTA said the southbound closure would be in place from 10am on Friday until 4.30am on Monday, weather permitting.

Southbound traffic would need to detour via State Highway 59 while the closure was in place.

It said there would also be a northbound lane closure on the motorway, which was expected to cause delays for northbound traffic.

Transmission Gully. (File photo) RNZ / Angus Dreaver

Mark Owen, regional manager for lower North Island/top of the South, said people needed to prepare for long queues and travel delays, and should try to avoid the peak congestion times expected on Sunday afternoon.

“These are major works on a key part of our state highway network. An impact on traffic is unavoidable, and it is essential that drivers are prepared for it.”

He said NZTA had identified problems, such as pinch points on the SH59 detour route, and taken steps to address them.

“We will have extra staff on duty to manage traffic, and we will close off the SH59 Link Road, which we saw added to congestion for traffic trying to use the detour route,” he said.

But he said now was the best time for them to do the roadworks.

“This must be done during the warmer summer weather. It cannot be done during winter, as the repairs would not work. We also want to get the drainage work completed so the motorway can be open to traffic during the busier Christmas/New Year holiday period.”

Metlink senior manager of operations, Paul Tawharu said buses replacing Metlink train services on the Kāpiti Line this weekend were due to KiwiRail making “vital improvements” to the rail network.

He said as NZTA was also carrying out maintenance on Transmission Gully this weekend, buses replacing trains during this maintenance would be detoured with all other traffic.

“We strongly encourage Metlink passengers to plan ahead and expect delays this weekend. They can keep up to date with service changes on the Metlink website or app.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

‘Phenomenal’ response: $70m raised for Icehouse Ventures seed fund to help start 30 businesses

Source: Radio New Zealand

Icehouse Ventures chief executive Robbie Paul. Smoke Photography Ltd

Icehouse Ventures says the response to its latest early-stage seed fund has been “phenomenal”, raising a record $70 million to help at least 30 ventures get started.

Chief executive Robbie Paul said the market was hot, with new investments continuing to flow from family offices and individuals.

“The venture capital and startup ecosystem is extremely vibrant and I think the reason is that most companies are operating on very long-term time horizons,” he said.

“They don’t start a company because the market’s bad and they don’t give up for the same reason.

“They have big missions that they’ve been thinking about and researching and working on for a very long time, and will continue to pursue those irrespective of who’s in power, who’s in the White House, what the weather is and anything else.”

The fund was capped at $75m, with an end-of-year deadline to raise the last $5m.

“It feels like we’ll hit that fairly shortly.”

A maturing ecosystem

Paul said Icehouse had been hoping to raise $30m for Seed Fund IV, but quickly attracted investment from 363 investors, with 80 percent based in New Zealand.

He said more than half of the investors were entirely new to Icehouse Ventures, while 147 had backed the firm’s prior seed funds, with a core group of 26 invested in all four, and 17 investors from the United States, China, Singapore, India and Germany contributing a combined $22m.

“The success of Seed Fund IV demonstrates a renewed belief in Kiwi entrepreneurs and signals that the startup economy is very much back in motion,” Paul said.

He said the investment represented a maturing of the venture capital ecosystem.

Past recipients pay it forward

“The rise of the ecosystem was inevitable because entrepreneurs build businesses over time horizons that far exceed presidential terms and macro-economic swings.”

Cheque sizes had grown significantly, with commitments ranging from $25,000 to $5m in Seed Fund IV.

Paul said the most encouraging trend was the rise of founder-investors who have scaled companies of their own and were reinvesting into the ecosystem that backed them.

Nearly a dozen had invested in the latest fund, including the co-founders of award-winning global educational software business, Kami.

“Founders know the difference that early capital and the right partner can make,” Paul said.

“Having a large cohort of entrepreneurs in our fund means we can tap into their expertise to help the next generation.”

Where the money goes

Seed Fund IV was the largest seed fund in the country’s history, with $6.3m already committed to eight NZ-founded startups over the next three years.

The early investments included AI presentation creator, Aether, design collaboration platform, Harth, and industrial engineering software, Spaceproof, and fraud-prevention technology startup, Static Technologies.

“Our goal with the seed fund is to invest as early as possible,” Paul said.

“Success for us is finding companies who’ve never raised money and sometimes are not even established, and to start investing with small amounts at that point, and then to invest further as they achieve technical and commercial milestones.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Politics with Michelle Grattan: Sussan Ley on Barnaby’s defection and how the environment law deal ‘fell apart’

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has had a rugged start as leader. With Liberal rivals Angus Taylor and Andrew Hastie circling for her position, Ley needs to not only survive, but rebuild her party from its historic lows in the polls.

Just hours after Labor announced a new deal with the Greens to pass new environment laws, and former Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce quit his party and the Coalition, Ley joined us on the podcast.

On Joyce’s defection to become an independent MP and potentially join One Nation, Ley said she would leave the commentary to others.

Barnaby, while being a friend of mine – has been for many years, we’re both long-term colleagues in the parliament – is a free agent when it comes to why he’s leaving the Nationals, what he’s going to do next.

These are all matters for him I wouldn’t commentate on. And I don’t sit in the Nationals’ party room. So I really can’t comment on what goes on there, or what any of the thinking might be right now.

With respect to our coalition with the Nationals, I do want to say this: that we are stronger together, the Liberals and Nationals. I firmly believe that, because together we can fight this Labor government as the non-Labor parties of opposition.

On Thursday morning, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced his government had struck with the Greens to pass new environment laws.

Ley says the Opposition had been negotiating with the government into early Thursday morning – until “that fell apart” and the deal with the Greens was announced.

At nine o’clock [Wednesday] night, I was talking to Senator [Jonno] Duniam and the Shadow Minister of Environment Angie Bell, and they were showing me a table with where we had got to with seven key requests around amendments and how the conversation was going […] and they had early conversations very early this morning.

[…] I honestly think there wasn’t an intention to make it work with us. The simple reason for that is there isn’t a rule that says this has to be completed today. There’s actually a committee process that was stretching into next year, into March, in fact.

[…] I think [this was] very rushed. And I’m very doubtful how this is actually going to achieve what the prime minister has said it will around either protecting the environment, but more importantly speeding up approvals processes.

On Ley’s previous support for a net zero emissions target for 2050 compared to her party’s policy now, Ley said that changing circumstances led her to change her view.

I’m 100% committed to the policy that I’m talking about today.

I looked at the circumstances we’re facing, the evidence about what the transition to a long-term target of net zero has meant for the economy and the country and for households, and realised that we are totally on the wrong track.

So in expressing views about net zero in the past, I would see them through the prism of I care about climate change, I care about reducing emissions. I want Australia to play its part. I meant that then, I mean that now.

This week, the latest Australian Election Study revealed voters ranked Labor ahead of the Coalition as the preferred party on economic management and taxation for the first time.

Asked about the Coalition’s chances of winning at the next election, Ley said she doesn’t accept it will take two elections to get back to government:

Not at all. The role of opposition is to hold the government to account, to fight for what we believe in, to develop that policy offering and to take it forward. And I think this is a terrible government. I don’t think this government deserves to win the next election.

There is no agenda. There is no ambition for Australians. And what has been delivered this year […] is higher power prices, higher inflation and […] a really challenging budget bottom line for individual households, with the prospect of higher interest rates next year. So higher cost of living sums all that up and families are hurting.

On attracting more women to the party, Ley congratulated both of the newly-elected Liberal leaders in Victoria in New South Wales. But she said she remains “agnostic” about how the party attracts more women.

I just want to recognise those outstanding female leaders: Jess Wilson in Victoria, Kellie Sloane in New South Wales, and of course we have the chief minister of the Northern Territory, Lia Finocchiaro. And they are shining examples for Liberal leadership across this country at a state and territory level.

[…] As I’ve mentioned before, the role of candidates and selection is one that individual divisions make. We don’t do it from the federal organisational level, nor should we.

We’ve got [Senator] James McGrath doing a longer-term review of how we make the Liberal Party – like many organisations – more relevant to the job that we want to do for Australians and the role that people can play in that if they join us as members.

[…] I’m agnostic about how we achieve more women. But we must get there.

The Conversation

Michelle Grattan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. Politics with Michelle Grattan: Sussan Ley on Barnaby’s defection and how the environment law deal ‘fell apart’ – https://theconversation.com/politics-with-michelle-grattan-sussan-ley-on-barnabys-defection-and-how-the-environment-law-deal-fell-apart-270801

Grattan on Friday: when the music stopped, Greens had out-stepped flat-footed Liberals on environment deal

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

Come dance with me! That was Environment Minister Murray Watt’s invitation to the opposition as he prepared to push through his reforms to the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.

Yes, get up and dance! That was business’s clear message to the Coalition. But it wouldn’t, or couldn’t agree with the government on mutually acceptable steps. The Greens could, and did. They won concessions on native forest logging and land clearing, and the exclusion of fossil fuel projects from the fast track approval process.

Finally, after more than five years, the EPBC job was done.

Watt always said he was open to dealing with either the Coalition or the Greens. The opposition is making all sorts of excuses, including that the legislation was rushed, but the bottom line is the Liberals failed an important test. It is the more galling because Ley, as environment minister, commissioned the independent review from Graeme Samuel that reported in 2020, on which this legislation is based.

The argument that the detailed legislation should have been held over until next year may appear superficially attractive but is flawed. The issue has dragged on for too long and more delay would only have invited slippage.

The government said the opposition was a shambles in its negotiations, including adding new demands as late as Wednesday. Among the Coalition negotiators Jonno Duniam, manager of opposition business in the Senate, seemed, according to Labor sources, the keenest to get a deal.

A week ago Duniam had certainly been confident there would be a Coalition-government agreement. Duniam was brought into the discussions in the last couple of weeks to support Angie Bell, the shadow environment minister. A Tasmanian from the conservative wing of the Liberals, Duniam is home affairs spokesman, but was previously shadow environment minister. In the Morrison government, he was assistant minister for forestry and fisheries, working under then-agriculture minister, Nationals leader David Littleproud. He was popular in the Littleproud office. “He did the shit Littleproud didn’t want to do,” says one observer from the time.

It’s not just business that would have preferred the deal to be with the Coalition. Western Australian Labor premier Roger Cook said on Thursday:

there has been a missed opportunity here and that missed opportunity was to do an agreement with the Liberal Party to make sure the legislation perhaps had further reflected the concerns about industry.

Samuel said after the decision that the Coalition had “dealt themselves into irrelevancy, following five years of obfuscation, obstruction and contradiction”. He said if business had problems with the legislation it should not complain to the government or the Greens, but to the opposition.

The reform is a major win for a government whose critics on the left are calling for it to be more reformist (although it doesn’t satisfy those who are hardline on fossil fuels). It should significantly speed up decisions for development projects as well as provide better environmental protection. It’s an impressive achievement personally for Watt, a pragmatic Queenslander from the left, who is one of the government’s best performing ministers.

Watt set out his determination to secure the legislation this final sitting week of 2025, consulted widely, negotiated endlessly, and was relatively transparent. He worked closely with the prime minister, who came into the negotiations in the closing stages to ensure a deal could be landed that was acceptable to stakeholders and deliverable quickly through the Senate.

While Watt could bask in his success, two colleagues, Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Climate and Energy Minister, Chris Bowen have ended the parliamentary year under substantial pressure.

As Chalmers prepares the budget update, released mid next month, this week’s uptick in inflation, to 3.8% over the year to October, not only underscores that home buyers won’t be getting any interest rate fall in the foreseeable future, but suggests the next rate move could possibly be up rather than down.

Chalmers is struggling to contain government spending for the next budget. That will hit the public service – which has just been told to find savings – but also likely other areas. Spending in general is running too high, and the early days of the term are when hard decisions need to be taken. Adding to Chalmers’ difficulties are calls for the mid-year update to extend relief on power bills, given the high energy costs. Chalmers says a decision has yet to be made.

In coming months Bowen will feel the political heat as much as Chalmers. The opposition targeted him in parliament, after the Australian government’s compromise deal with Turkey over next year’s United Nations climate conference (COP) which will see Bowen (as a consolation prize) in charge of negotiations.

The opposition is dubbing him the “part time” energy minister; Bowen insists the COP role can be readily fitted with his ministerial job. He was anxious to point out that most recent COP negotiators had had full ministerial positions as well. Within the government, there is a wait-and-see attitude on how the dual role will go for Bowen, who has his critics in Labor. Although the overload is seriously questionable – given the troubles in the energy transition and the political problem of power prices – the government can argue it is only for a year.

As the parliament wound down, a ceremony was held for the unveiling of former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull’s official portrait, with guests including former Liberal ministers Julie Bishop, George Brandis and Christopher Pyne. Unsurprisingly, Turnbull had some acerbic comments about the opposition’s performance on the environment bill, telling reporters, “the Coalition could have played an active role, but they chose not to. […] what few supporters they have left in the business community will just be horrified”. Ley dashed in for the obligatory handshake with the man in whose ministry she served, and then resigned from over a travel claim issue.

It was (of course) Barnaby Joyce who put on the show of the day, with his announcement to the parliament of his formal departure from the Nationals. Seeking relevance, the maverick is considered to be on his way to One Nation, although he is taking the slow train, and will for the moment be an independent.

Joyce, the smell of power in his nostrils, is likely to run as a One Nation candidate for the Senate. There, he said, they’d “have to come to me on each piece of legislation and say ‘what are your views?‘ I’ve done the Senate before – eight years, seven months and a day. I know that I know the job.”

The Conversation

Michelle Grattan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. Grattan on Friday: when the music stopped, Greens had out-stepped flat-footed Liberals on environment deal – https://theconversation.com/grattan-on-friday-when-the-music-stopped-greens-had-out-stepped-flat-footed-liberals-on-environment-deal-269918

New Zealand’s biggest navy ship made transit through sensitive Taiwan Strait this month

Source: Radio New Zealand

The HMNZS Aotearoa. (File photo) Supplied / NZDF

New Zealand’s biggest navy ship HMNZS Aotearoa has made a trip through the sensitive Taiwan Strait.

The Strait is part of the South China Sea, over which several countries, including China and the Philippines, have contested territorial claims.

Reuters reported Chinese forces tracked and followed the ship.

Defence Minister Judith Collins said the supply vessel had been on deployment since September after having maintenance done in Singapore.

It sailed through the Strait on 5 November on its way to the North Asian region to take part in UN monitoring of sanctions against North Korea.

Collins said all actions during the transit had been safe, professional and consistent with international law.

That included exercising the right to freedom of navigation, as guaranteed under the United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea.

“The NZDF conducts all activities in accordance with international law and best practice. By doing this, we are demonstrating our commitment to the international rules-based system in our near region – the Indo-Pacific”.

The Aotearoa also sailed through the Strait last year in September. The minister said at the time it was with an Australian ship as part of routine activity.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Residents warned to keep windows shut after series of scrub fires break out in Otago and Southland

Source: Radio New Zealand

A scrub fire in Palmerston. Supplied / Martin Neame

Authorities are warning residents in the Otago town of Palmerston near a pine tree blaze to keep their windows and doors shut due to smoke.

The fire started at 2:35pm on Thursday near Goodwood Rd and had been fought by ground crews and four helicopters.

It was now contained, but burnt through 25 hectares of pine.

Fire and Emergency said there was no risks to homes but smoke may blow towards the town on Thursday night.

“People in the vicinity of the fire should keep windows and doors shut and stay inside if possible.

“Remember to also keep the ventilation systems in your house and car turned off.”

Fire crews were expected to mop up the blaze on Friday morning.

It was one of nine fires across Otago and Southland on Thursday which had all been contained or extinguished by 9pm.

Near the Southland town of Mataura, State Highway 96 would remain closed over Thursday night between State Highway 1 and Waimumu due to a now contained fire which was 300 x 200m in size.

Nine fire trucks and two helicopters tackled the fire at a forestry block.

It would be extinguished on Friday morning.

Meanwhile, four crews were called to a paddock fire in Papakaio in the Waitaki district sparked by a trampoline blowing into powerlines.

Two crews were working on a smouldering tree near Whitstone.

The wind blew three branches onto two cars in Oamaru but Fire and Emergency (FENZ) said a dog in one of the cars was not hurt.

A paddock fire that broke out on Johnston Rd on the outskirts of Balclutha about 1pm had been contained.

FENZ said 30 firefighters on the ground and two helicopters with monsoon buckets were now working to put it out.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Aucklanders against plan to trial fortnightly rubbish collections

Source: Radio New Zealand

About 80 percent of written submissions were against the a proposed trial to halve the number of kerbside collections in Te Atatū, Panmure, Tāmaki, Clendon Park and Weymouth. Supplied / Auckland Council

Aucklanders are overwhelmingly against a plan to trial fortnightly rubbish collections.

Auckland Council received 5086 submissions on a proposed trial to halve the number of kerbside collections in Te Atatū, Panmure, Tāmaki, Clendon Park and Weymouth from February to August.

About 80 percent of written submissions were against the trial.

Auckland Council’s general manager of waste solutions, Justine Haves, said there were some common themes.

They included worries about managing fuller bins, smells, hygiene and whether they would have enough bin space, particularly in big households.

The council had ideas about to help, he said.

“If the trial goes ahead, we will offer additional and larger bins at no cost, support households with higher waste needs, and provide a one-off rates remission for participating ratepayers,” he said

There was some positive feedback.

“Supporters highlighted the need to reduce waste to landfill and the opportunity to test the service before any wider decisions are made,” he said.

“Some also noted they don’t produce enough rubbish to need a weekly collection,”

The trial was part of a plan by the council to reduce household kerbside waste by 29 percent by 2030.

There were 2377 written submissions from the trial area, with another 2090 from other places.

About 5 percent of people made face-to-face submissions, with those people more likely to be evenly split.

A decision on whether to go ahead would be made next month.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Dunedin City Council will ask for interest to set up housing outreach service

Source: Radio New Zealand

RNZ / Nate McKinnon

The Dunedin City Council will ask for expressions of interest to set up a housing outreach service in a bid to help address a growing homelessness crisis

.

The council was originally discussing setting up an in-house service immediately for $270,000, but a new motion opted to ask for proposals from community providers and report back to council with the options instead.

The vote narrowly passed by eight votes against seven.

A report tabled at Thursday’s council meeting said homelessness and housing insecurity were rising among Dunedin’s young people, and the city’s transition home was under increasing pressure with a long and growing waiting list.

During the debate, different councillors flagged the horror stories they knew about in the city – mothers living in cars with babies, tents set up in parks and reserves, and a family of seven sleeping in two cars.

Councillor Andrew Simms put forward the new motion, saying it was clear the elected members all believed that council had a role to play in addressing homelessness in the city, the debate was around how to achieve that.

His motion was not shutting the door on an in-house outreach service, but sought to hear from trusted and established providers about what they could do before they examined all of the proposals, he said.

He believed there could be more cost effective ways of creating an outreach service than the proposed $270,000 in-house service that included two full time equivalent staff and a moderate operating budget.

The passed motion allows the chief executive to develop the terms for service including an initial three year service starting in April, performance measures and community outcomes, and annual reporting, before staff ask for expressions of interest to deliver the service.

Councillor Marie Laufiso did not support the motion, instead foreshadowing that she would support setting up a council-led housing outreach service immediately.

This service needed to be built yesterday and it was frustrating that they had not been able to give staff the resources they needed to set one up, she said.

Councillor Christine Garey said the message from the community on the frontline was they were looking to the council for leadership.

She called for a bold, courageous decision, saying they needed to put their money with their mouth was and should go with an in house model.

Councillor Russell Lund, who supported the motion, said it was naive to think that the council could provide the same kind of service that established organisations offered in such a short timeframe.

Councillor Lee Vandervis also backed the motion, saying it potentially gave them the best of both worlds by ensuring those with expertise were involved, allowing for local sponsors and had the potential to get up and running quicker.

Councillor Jules Radich called the proposal “practical”.

Councillor Brent Weatherall said he believed the problem was out of control and existing outreach services were the most cost effective option.

Councillor Mandy Mayhem, who voted against the motion, said they needed urgent and immediate action.

Councillor Steve Walker said it was clear they wanted a solution, but they were getting bogged down on how to get there.

He backed setting up an in house model before considering possible transitions further down the track.

Mayor Sophie Barker supported the plan to explore different proposals, saying they needed to make the right decision rather than a fast one.

In the original proposal, the council said the new service would connect people to the appropriate support service, help them use the services, respond to people at high risk of harm and work with emergency services to de-escalate situations.

During the public forum, Aaron Hawkins from the Otago Housing Alliance told the council that more public housing was needed in the long term, but right now more support was needed for people experiencing homelessness.

“There’s no outcome of any review that won’t tell us that this outreach service is needed and needed urgently in our city,” he said.

The government had acknowledged that the need existed, but they had not gone far enough, he said.

The report said the Ministry of Social Development had recently funded Catholic Social Services to support people experiencing homelessness and help to link them to the Ministry’s services.

That initiative was expected to run for up to one financial year.

The Alliance surveyed council candidates ahead of the election with the overwhelming majority stating they believed the council had a role to play in addressing homelessness in the city, he said.

“This is the first opportunity you have as elected members to make a meaningful contribution to that work.”

He would love for central government to see this as a core part of its responsibilities and resource it adequately.

“But they don’t and we can’t wait for government to come and save us, we need to be in control of our own destiny.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Construction of controversial sewerage pipeline near Rotorua lake heads back to court

Source: Radio New Zealand

The scheme would connect about 440 Lake Tarawera properties to the public wastewater network. (File photo) Michal Klajban

The construction of a controversial sewerage pipeline near a Rotorua lake is set to head back to court.

The Rotokākahi Board of Control (RBOC) was taking the Rotorua Lakes Council to the High Court over the Tarawera Sewage Scheme which would connect about 440 Lake Tarawera properties to the public wastewater network.

Part of the pipeline, 1.4km of it, would run along Tarawera Rd parallel to Lake Rotokākahi an area considered wāhi tapu by mana whenua, with tūpuna (ancestors) buried nearby during the 1886 Mt Tarawera eruption.

The construction of the pipeline had been intermittent, with protests, an occupation of the area and seven arrests for trespass in February 2025.

Speaking to RNZ in February, Rotorua Lakes Council chief executive Andrew Moraes said the scheme would remove the need for properties in the vicinity of Lake Tarawera to have septic tanks which often leak into the lake.

“We have almost 20km of pipe throughout the district of similar type and construction that is installed a similar distance from our other lakes and we’ve had no incidences of those pipes leaking in the history of this district,” he said.

Board spokesperson Te Whatanui Leka Skipwith said the council’s refusal to honour genuine consultation with mana whenua had pushed this into the courtroom.

“We welcome our day in court – because we’ve had enough. Council has ignored consultation, disrespected the process, and pulled last-minute legal stunts whenever we pushed back.

“On December 1, they’ll have to front. No more hiding behind rushed paperwork, closed-door deals or political convenience. This is a chance for mana whenua to finally challenge the council on neutral ground – and to make it clear that we will always protect Rotokākahi, no matter who tries to silence us.”

Skipwith said the message from the RBOC consultation must be real, legal obligations must be honoured and mana whenua decision-making must be respected.

A previous bid to stop the pipeline being installed had failed in the Environment Court.

The hearing at High Court at Rotorua was set to begin on Monday, December 1.

RNZ approached Rotorua Lakes Council who said as the matter was before the courts, it would not be appropriate to comment.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

East Sepik Governor Bird slams Marape’s ‘risky’ 2026 Budget overspend

By Scott Waide, RNZ Pacific PNG correspondent

Papua New Guinea’s 2026 National Budget has drawn immediate opposition criticism from East Sepik Governor Allan Bird, who says the government continues to overspend, overestimate revenue, and deliver few tangible results for ordinary citizens.

The K$30.9 billion (about NZ$12.8 billion) spending plan, unveiled earlier this week, has been characterised by analysts as highly political and aligned with next year’s election cycle.

Critics argue the Marape government has again prioritised high-visibility projects over long-term structural programs that would strengthen essential services.

Bird said this year’s budget followed a familiar pattern — record allocations on paper, but limited real-world improvements.

He pointed to ongoing shortages in medicines, persistent law and order challenges, and what he viewed as a widening gap between spending announcements and service delivery outcomes.

He has also raised concerns about revenue assumptions, noting that last year’s budget was short by K$2.5 billion and required significant mid-year corrections.

Bird believes similar risks exist in the 2026 plan, warning that overly optimistic revenue forecasts could again lead to financial strain.

Flawed fiscal discipline
Another key criticism centres on fiscal discipline. According to Bird, spending outside the formal budget framework remains common, with additional expenditures later reconciled in the Final Budget Outcome.

He said this practice undermines transparency and highlights deeper issues in the government’s financial management.

While the government insists the budget focuses on infrastructure, job creation, and community development, public reaction online has been overwhelmingly sceptical.

Many Papua New Guineans are questioning why record-high spending has not translated into better healthcare, education, or security.

For Bird and many critics, the central measure of any budget is whether it improves the everyday lives of citizens. Based on recent years, they believe the benefits have been limited — and they see little in the 2026 budget to suggest that trend will change.

This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

Article by AsiaPacificReport.nz

Bioeconomy Science Institute to ask for voluntary redundancies

Source: Radio New Zealand

Bioeconomy Science Institute CEO Mark Piper SUPPLIED/PLANT & FOOD RESEARCH

The Bioeconomy Science Institute is planning to ask for voluntary redundancies from all permanent staff.

The institute – formed in July – saw the merger of AgResearch, Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research, Plant & Food Research and Scion into a single organisation as part of an overhaul of the science sector.

CEO Mark Piper said the proposed voluntary redundancy offer was part of a financial improvement process to support the new organisation.

It employs 2300 people and its headquarters is at the Lincoln University Campus in Canterbury.

Piper said voluntary redundancy, “would give individuals space to reflect on their own aspirations as we shape the next phase of our institute”.

“These steps will help us build a more connected and resilient organisation, positioned to support our partners and continue delivering research that matters. Our priority through this process remains maintaining continuity across our research and supporting New Zealand’s bioeconomy.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Crypto accountant warning investors that tax collector is coming for them

Source: Radio New Zealand

Last year IRD signalled it was honing in on people dealing crypto who were not declaring their income. Supplied

A crypto accountant is warning investors that the tax collector is coming for them, with seven out of ten people trading in crypto assets currently side stepping their tax obligations.

In July last year IRD signalled it was honing in on people dealing crypto who were not declaring their income.

The Department had identified had 227,000 unique crypto asset users in New Zealand undertaking around 7 million transactions with a value of $7.8 billion.

Accountant Tim Doyle specialises in cryptocurrency and said nearly a third of his clients have now received letters from IRD calling in tax they owe.

Doyle told Checkpoint while the law does outline that tax must be paid on crypto, the reality is a little more confusing.

“New Zealand doesn’t have a capital gains tax, so you can own property or own shares in companies and not have to pay taxes,”

“But with crypto because it’s digital because it’s intangible, ID have the default position that it’s a speculative investment and people have it likely acquired it for the purpose of disposal and that’s why they want to tax every single dollar of gains from it.”

Not everyone has to pay tax on crypto, it is only when the crypto is acquired with an intention to dispose that it must be paid.

“So that’s actually going to capture most investors or most crypto investors.”

An investor can have crypto sitting for as long as they like without having to pay tax on it, but as soon as they sell it, tax comes into play.

“As soon as they sell it to New Zealand dollars or they sell it from one token to another, that’s the time that any gains or losses are realised, and that’s the taxable point.”

Doyle said the amount of unpaid tax on crypto was “significant”, and over the past few years his business alone has been filing two to three voluntary disclosures a week.

The tax bills that have come through his office range from a few thousand dollars to a few million.

He said he has one client currently owing around $600,000, after his crypto took a huge dive.

“He put $100,000 New Zealand dollars into crypto, he was able to turn that into about $1.6 million over a couple of years… he took those tokens and he moved them into another token, which is a taxable event.”

“Rather than cashing it out and paying his taxes because he didn’t know about crypto tax, he left his crypto investment in the market.”

Doyle said the investments declined in value, back down to $100,000, leaving the client with a debt he doesn’t have the wealth to now pay.

He said it is clear there has been a stronger crackdown from IRD recently.

“I think there’s a strong mandate from this government to not only crack down on crypto tax, but just wider taxes as a whole.”

“Certainly IRD are sending out letters and requesting information on crypto from investors.”

Every single dollar of crypto is taxable at a taxpayers marginal tax rate, which could be as high as 39%.

“It’s treated the same as normal income, which is quite unfavourable and perhaps inconsistent from other asset classes.”

Doyle said cryptocurrency asset holders who are owing tax will first receive a warning letter from IRD, and may face an audit.

If the asset holder then doesn’t become compliant, further steps will be taken.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Millions spent on new speedway track at Auckland’s Waikaraka Park

Source: Radio New Zealand

Millions of dollars have been spent on a new speedway track at Auckland’s Waikaraka Park, with drivers calling it “a win” for the motor sports community.

An $11 million construction project has finished just in time for the first Auckland race of the 2025-2026 speedway season on Saturday.

Speedway New Zealand, the governing body of the sport in Aotearoa, certified the safety of the new track on November 26.

It was the first new speedway track the country had built in the last 25 years.

Midget car driver Ben Morrison was stoked to test out the track for the first time on Thursday, a year after the upgrades were first announced.

Midget car driver Ben Morrison. RNZ / Marika Khabazi

“We’ve all followed the progress on social media and seen how it’s tracking. Huge credit to the people who have been building this in the wettest months of the year, and they got it done just in time.

“It was a whole lot of fun out there. I think it’s got potential to be the best track in the country.”

In October 2024, Auckland Council made the controversial decision to end nearly 100 years of speedway racing at Western Springs and move all speedway to Waikaraka Park in Onehunga.

Sprint car driver Luke Brown, who also owned and worked on his car, said it was sad to see speedway end at Western Springs.

“It is sad that Western Springs is gone. Awesome place, awesome venue, awesome history.”

But he said the new track was a massive improvement from what the city had to offer before, and it made more sense to have a single venue for motorsports.

The new and improved speedway track opens on Saturday. RNZ / Marika Khabazi

“For me, I think it’s a vast improvement in terms of spectator viewership and potential sponsorship. It’s one facility run by two different groups. It’s the best of both worlds; you can pick and choose which [speedway] classes you want or don’t want to see.

“The facilities are good, and they’re only going to get better. Overall, I think it’s a win.”

After its facelift, Waikaraka Park now sported a wider track, new lighting and toilet facilities, and an improved speedway safety wall and catch fence.

A new pit area had been built, fitting up to 130 racers at a time, 40 more than before. The pit would also be open to fans during racing, for them to mingle with drivers.

There was also a new heritage wall, honouring the track’s history from when speedway racing started there in 1967.

Auckland Stock and Saloon Car Club, which hosted speedway events at Waikaraka Park, said at the moment, the venue could accommodate 4500 spectators at a time, with 3000 in the grandstand.

Waikaraka Park can accommodate 4500 spectators at a time. RNZ / Marika Khabazi

Club promoter Bruce Robertson said the new track, designed by an architect who is a former speedway driver, was similar to international speedway tracks.

“We’ve really got a great facility here for racing and the track’s banked as well, which is unusual for a New Zealand track; there’s only one other that has a banked track. This is something they’ll get used to and enjoy American-style racing.”

He said the consolidation of speedway in Auckland to just one venue means drivers and fans would have a better experience.

“There’s still some thinking Western Springs [speedway] should continue on. But if this [upgrade] wasn’t done, they would have nowhere to race.

“I’ve invested a lot in Western Springs, unfortunately, but times have changed.”

They were expecting sell-out crowds for their upcoming events.

Racing will return on Saturday. RNZ / Marika Khabazi

Waikaraka Park had a lease in place until 2051, with the club, which would now host all four-wheel speedway classes, including the open wheel classes that previously raced at Western Springs.

Meanwhile, the Western Springs Speedway Association was taking Auckland Council to court.

Spokesperson Jason Jones believed having just one venue for speedway would not help the sport’s growth.

“We’re happy for Waikaraka, but it’s not a solution for the entire sport whatsoever.

“Anyone who says it’s a great thing for speedway moving forward is not being truthful.”

He argued Western Springs could accommodate larger crowds, which would attract more money from sponsors.

“A key aspect of the business model with motorsport is sponsorship, if you own a car or your race, and that’s solely based around bums on seats. The less people you have at a venue, the less exposure you have for your branding, and the less likely it is for you to gain sponsorship.”

Celebrating the opening of the new track, Tātaki Auckland Unlimited (TAU) chief executive Nick Hill said focusing on Waikaraka was the right call.

Tātaki Auckland Unlimited (TAU) chief executive Nick Hill. RNZ / Marika Khabazi

“Not everybody has been supportive of these changes and the consolidation, but that’s the history of all sporting venues when they consolidate or move somewhere new.

“People are very passionate about their experiences with sport, and there’s a lot of history with the [speedway] venues. But this secures the future of speedway in Auckland in one place, and at one venue.”

TAU were looking at adding more spectator seating at Waikaraka Park in the future.

Auckland Council was expected to make a final decision about how Western Springs Stadium will be used going forward early next year.

Racing will return to Waikaraka Park from Saturday, November 29, for stock and saloon cars, followed by open-wheel racing on Saturday, December 13.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Proposed Waikato housing subdivision sparks land occupation

Source: Radio New Zealand

The occupation site near the shores of Lake Whakamaru in Waikato. LIBBY KIRKBY-MCLEOD / RNZ

A proposed 66 house subdivision near the shores of Lake Whakamaru in Waikato has sparked a land occupation by a local hapū.

But the issues Ngāti Te Kohera were fighting for go much deeper than the one development; and they might not be easy to solve.

When Jonathan Quigley set about asking for his land to be rezoned from rural to rural-lifestyle, he thought he did everything right.

“We consulted extensively with iwi and they helped, through conversations with them, they helped essentially inform the end result,” he said.

He said the feedback from iwi leaders he engaged with was that the consultation had been well done.

“So, you can imagine our surprise when we then had an occupation start on the end of the first day of the [plan change] hearing,” he said.

Ngāti Te Kohera hapū representative Craig Ahipene said they had problems with the proposed development culturally, environmentally and legally – and thought it would just be an eyesore.

However, many of the group’s concerns go back to the history of how the land fell into private hands, and to the way the crown developed the hydro lake in the first place.

“The river was flooded to form the new hydro lake that is there today. Unfortunately, the crown at the time didn’t allow us, and other hapū, to remove our dead,” Ahipene said.

The land near the shores of Lake Whakamaru in Waikato. LIBBY KIRKBY-MCLEOD / RNZ

This meant any development near the lake which might result in pollution of the river was deeply concerning to the hapū.

“Human waste that goes into that river is a grievous cultural harm to the mana and tapu and mouri of our dead ancestors, and ourselves as well because we are the protectors of that.”

Quigley said the proposal took that concern on board and had been developed so no sewage could get in the river, along with mitigating other environmental concerns.

Local Hope Woodward was against the development and said it might be well planned but the lakeside was not the place for 66 houses.

“It’s going to be an environmental experiment basically and this space just doesn’t need it,” she said.

She wanted the area to be protected as undeveloped land.

“We don’t have a lot of spaces like this left around our country and this is only going to set a precedent for further developments.”

The occupation was not on Quigley’s land but on the public land reserve right in front of it.

He said he’d been told the area was now under a rāhui and restrictions apply to when and how he and his family could use the reserve.

A South Waikato District Council spokesperson said it was aware of public access being restricted to the site and had seen reports of an apparent rāhui being put in place for part of Lake Whakamaru Reserve.

“However, this has not been officially communicated to us in any form. Raukawa, as the iwi who carry mana and responsibility for the hapū currently occupying the area, are the appropriate body to work with the group on this matter,” the spokesperson said.

The council said it respected the group’s right to peaceful protest, with maintaining public access to the site and the safe management of any fire present being its key concerns.

Both Quigley and those occupying the land said interactions at the lake are generally respectful, though online things have got personal.

“I’ve received death threats via Facebook, so that’s not fun,” he said.

Quigley felt lies had been spread about him and the development online, and it was an enormously stressful situation for his whole family.

“My wife is pretty strung out knowing what I’m going through, my kids are old enough to see that it’s having an effect, and it’s all for stuff that’s not actually accurate.”

Jacinta Rata had been occupying the land since day one and said the occupation was affecting those taking part.

“We’ve all had to sacrifice a lot to be here on the ground,” she said.

She said it wasn’t a situation anyone wanted, even those taking part in the occupation.

“But you know, I think if we didn’t do it, it would be harder to live with… if we didn’t do anything,” she said.

Ahipene said regardless of the outcome of the proposed development, the hapū expected the occupation to continue until they could preserve the land.

And that’s bigger than Quigley.

“The crown basically has created this problem through its processes in history and so the crown needs to be part of the solution as well,” said Ahipene.

Not that he had much faith in the current government. His faith was with where he felt the mood of the public was.

“The majority are against this [government’s] attack on the environment, we’re against this attack on Māori rights,” he said.

The proposed plan change was now with South Waikato District Council planning commissioners, and a decision was expected in the next few months.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Dunedin man charged with arson over Waikaia fire from almost two years ago

Source: Radio New Zealand

The fire which took place at a home on Elswick Street on 21 February 2024. Police / supplied

A man has been charged with arson in relation to a house fire in the Southland town of Waikaia that happened almost two years ago.

Emergency services were called to the home on Elswick Street on 21 February 2024, where the blaze caused extensive damage.

Damage from a fire in Waikaia, February 2024. Police / supplied

On Wednesday police charged a 35 year old Dunedin man with arson who was due to appear in Gore District Court on 17 December.

Detective Sergeant Brian McKinney thanked members of the public who provided information to police for their investigation.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

National MP Carlos Cheung says he is ‘deeply saddened’ over Hong Kong fire

Source: Radio New Zealand

People look on as thick smoke and flames rise during a major fire at the Wang Fuk Court residential estate in Hong Kong’s Tai Po district. TOMMY WANG / AFP

National MP Carlos Cheung and several other Hong Kong New Zealanders have expressed their sadness and concern over the major fire that has killed dozens.

The blaze engulfed multiple residential towers in Hong Kong’s Tai Po district.

“I am deeply saddened by the devastating fire in Hong Kong last night,” MP Carlos Cheung said.

“As someone who was born in Hong Kong and came to New Zealand as a teenager, this tragedy feels especially close to home. My heart goes out to all the families who have lost loved ones, those who are injured, and everyone affected by this horrific incident.”

The fire, which has engulfed multiple residential towers in Hong Kong’s Tai Po district, has killed 44 people with around 270 missing.

“I also want to acknowledge the bravery of the first responders who put themselves at risk to save others,” Cheung said.

“As a New Zealand Member of Parliament, I stand in solidarity with the people of Hong Kong during this incredibly difficult time, and I hope for a full and transparent investigation so that answers and accountability can be found.

My thoughts are with all those grieving and with the survivors who now face an unimaginable recovery.”

The complex includes 2000 apartments and houses over 4600 people, many of whom were pensioners.

A Hong Kong New Zealander says he and his friends are saddened by the big fire in Tai Po.

Garry Ko, a committee member at the Hong Kong New Zealand Business Association, says he used to live close to the area where a few high-rise buildings are on fire.

“As someone born in Hong Kong, I’m really saddened when I saw news about the fire. Although I [have left] Hong Kong now, Tai Po is always home in my heart,” he says.

Garry Ko says he has been keeping a close eye on the response to the blaze and his organisation will discuss what they can do to help.

Another Hong Konger living in New Zealand Anthony Lo says he hopes these who are unaccounted for in the fire could be found safe.

Three men have been arrested on suspicion of manslaughter in relation to the deadly blaze – two directors and a consultant of a construction company.

All election-related work has been paused in the city.

– RNZ/CNN

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Death of Caleb Moefa’auo after being pepper sprayed haunts Corrections staff

Source: Radio New Zealand

An image of Caleb Moefa’auo positioned in the witness box at an inquest into his death in custody. RNZ/Felix Walton

A Corrections officer says the death of a man they pepper sprayed in Mt Eden Prison has stayed with them.

The second phase of a Coronial Inquest into the death of Caleb Moefa’auo is underway in the Auckland District Court.

It will focus on the circumstances of his death, how his mental health contributed to what happened and whether the officers involved adequately took this into account.

Moefa’auo had been previously diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder, and was staying at Tiaho Mai – a residential unit to support people with mental health issues – after pleading guilty to aggravated assault and shoplifting in June, 2021.

He was sent to Mt Eden Corrections Facility in December, 2021 after allegedly assaulting a fellow patient at Tiaho Mai, and was later placed in the prison’s Intervention and Support Unit, after being found to be at risk of self-harm.

The 26-year-old had a cardiac arrest after being pepper sprayed in 2022, in an altercation over returning towels following a shower.

Caleb Moefa’auo was only 26 when he died. Supplied

On Thursday, the officer who sprayed Moefa’auo gave tearful evidence, pausing a number of times to wipe their eyes.

The officer, who cannot be named, had been charged with assault but was acquitted in a trial by jury.

They said they would’ve approached Moefa’auo differently, if they had known more about him.

“It wasn’t until after his death that I found out that he had come from an acute mental health ward, hadn’t been taking his medication, and had not slept the previous night,” they said.

“Looking back now, I think I would have approached him differently if I had known more about him. The more information about the people we are looking after, the better decisions we can make.”

The officer believed using pepper spray was necessary to gain control of the situation.

“I want to be clear that my decision to use pepper spray was not because Caleb had more than one towel,” he said.

“The towel issue was what started the interaction, but my decision to draw and then use spray was about the situation becoming unsafe, and needing to regain control.”

The officer said they drew the spray as a warning, but couldn’t see any sign of Moefa’auo following instructions.

The officer said the decision to use pepper spray was made in good faith.

Looking back, the officer said he might have tried talking to Moefa’auo for longer or creating more space between them.

“At the time, I saw risk from Caleb’s non-compliance, his size, his raised and agitated behaviour, and the wet towels which can be used as a weapon or ligatures.”

The officer addressed Moefa’auo’s family who sat sullenly at the back of the courtroom.

The parents of Caleb Moefa’auo, Fereti Moefa’auo and Justine Lauese. Nick Monro

The officer choked back tears as they spoke about the impact of Moefa’auo’s death.

“Caleb’s death has stayed with me,” they said.

“I have replayed those moments many times in my mind and have reflected deeply on what happened that day, what began as a situation I believed I needed to manage for safety reasons ended in the outcome that none of us could have foreseen or wanted.”

They recognised the deep loss the Moefa’auo family carried, the officer said.

‘I try talk to the prisoners like they’re human’ – staffer says

The Coroner’s Court heard earlier on Thursday from another Corrections officer who tried to take Moefa’auo’s towel prior to him being pepper sprayed.

In phase one of the inquest, which took place in July, Counsel assisting the Coroner, Rebekah Jordan, outlined the series of events leading up to Moefa’auo’s death.

He had taken a shower that day, and used three towels to dry himself.

Caleb pictured with his mother. Supplied

After taking a fourth, an acting senior corrections officer approached him, holding a can of pepper spray.

Moefa’auo was told to pass the towel to another officer, which he did, before being directed to get on his knees.

When Moefa’auo began to rise, the acting senior officer shouted at him, before spraying him.

“Caleb was clearly affected by the pepper spray. A number of officers restrained Caleb on the ground and placed him in handcuffs… While this was happening Caleb repeatedly apologised and made the first of a number of comments that he could not breathe,” Jordan said.

The officers took him back to his cell, where he stopped responding.

The Corrections officer on Thursday said as they read their statement Moefa’auo was “passively resisting” when asked to hand the towel over.

“At the time of speaking to Caleb about the towel, I didn’t perceive him as a threat,” they said.

“The response that I was using to get the towel from Caleb, I believe, was appropriate, in that it was verbal communication, and I felt that I was going to be able to safely resolve the situation by talking to him.”

However, as Moefa’auo went to pick up more towels, he was confronted by other officers and the situation escalated, leading to the pepper spraying.

Coroner McKenzie asked the staffer how they balanced looking after their own safety with the safety of inmates in their day to day prison work.

“Is there an emphasis on one safety over the other,” she asked.

“Ever since I started this job, I try talk to the prisoners like they’re human, because they are,” the staffer said.

“I never go high, I never go low, I try and stay in that level with them, try and gain compliance, and that’s how I build my confidence in dealing with prisoners.”

Officer Scrutinised by family’s lawyer

The lawyer representing Moefa’auo’s family, Sam Wimsett KC, grilled the officer on the stringent rules around towels.

A badge made by the family of Moefa’auo. RNZ/Finn Blackwell

“Is it written down somewhere, what you were told?” he asked.

“Not to my knowledge” the officer replied.

“Is there a manual with these types of things?”

“Not that I know of,” the officer responded.

He asked if the officer thought they could’ve given Moefa’auo more of a warning, to which the officer agreed.

Wimsett pointed out pepper spray fell under the use of force, and that the physical use of force was meant to be the final option.

He questioned what other options the officer used to try de-escalate the situation.

“No other options,” the officer said.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

How England’s Premier League is trying to stop football’s financial arms race – without a salary cap

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By James Skinner, Dean Newcastle Business School/Professor of Sport Business, University of Newcastle

Debates about financial regulation in sport often begin with salary caps: strict, transparent cost-control mechanisms common in North American and Australian leagues.

They’re credited with improving competitive balance and financial sustainability, so many might assume English football would follow suit.

While England’s Premier League is preparing the most significant overhaul of its financial rules in a generation, it is avoiding a hard salary cap in favour of a bespoke framework designed for Europe’s promotion and relegation ecosystem and globally fluid transfer market.

So why have these rules been implemented, and will they help address football’s financial arms race, given one of the world’s richest and most financially unequal sporting competitions still refuses to introduce a salary cap?

What’s changing in the Premier League?

The Premier League recently announced that from 2026–27, clubs will move away from the Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR) introduced in the 2015–16 season, and towards a model centred on controlling football-related spending and ensuring long-term financial health.

The league’s stated aims are clarity, predictability and resilience. They shift focus from backward-looking accounting to real-time cost control and robust balance-sheet strength, with closer alignment to the approach of the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA).

Owners will retain freedom to invest in stadiums and infrastructure, but will face tighter constraints on wages, agent fees and “transfer amortisation” – an accounting practice where clubs spread the cost of a player’s transfer fee over the length of their contract to reduce annual costs and stay within spending limits.

Introducing the ‘squad cost ratio’

At the heart of the reforms, the squad cost ratio (SCR) caps how much a club may spend on its first-team squad (wages, agent fees and transfers) relative to its football revenue.

The headline limit is 85% of eligible income, with a small buffer for newly promoted sides to ease the transition.

In practice, a club generating £300 million (A$609 million) from match day, commercial and league distributions could spend around £255 million (A$518 million) on its squad.

Overspending can result in sanctions, including points deductions.

Unlike PSR’s three-year, business-wide profitability test, this squad cost ratio isolates football costs and is monitored during the season, making it easier to understand and harder to game.

Infrastructure and academy investment sit outside the ratio, which means the rule will likely curtail short-term arms races in player wages and fees.

The intent is to stop clubs overspending to keep pace with rivals, enhancing competitive balance without prescribing a hard salary cap.

The second pillar

The second pillar — sustainability and systemic resilience (SSR) — introduces financial health checks aimed at ensuring clubs are solvent and can survive unexpected financial shocks.

Three tests apply:

1. Working capital test. This verifies clubs hold enough cash and commitments to meet month-to-month obligations.

2. Liquidity test. This assesses whether a club can withstand an £85 million (A$173 million) adverse shock, such as lost broadcast income or failure to sell a player during the transfer window.

3. Positive equity test. This requires phasing in the replacement of owner loans with real investment – for example, instead of an owner lending £100 million that must be repaid, the owner invests £100 million as equity, making the club financially stronger.

Together, these measures push for stronger balance sheets, reduced reliance on risky debt and greater transparency, vital after years of insolvency threats across England’s football ecosystem.

By embedding resilience alongside cost control, the framework aims to curb boom-and-bust cycles and protect competitive integrity.

Some concerns remain

Despite its promise, the framework raises practical and strategic concerns.

First, English clubs may face competitive disadvantages in European markets if the rules around how they can generate and spend revenue are stricter than those used abroad. Minor differences may compound in a global talent race, potentially constraining investment in elite players over time.

Second, mandating equity injections while phasing out soft loans raises the cost of capital and narrows financial engineering options, making clubs more expensive to run and less attractive to private equity investment, especially mid-table teams with limited profits.

Third, and most acute, is valuation risk: SSR gives regulatory weight to “squad market value”, a volatile and loosely defined metric. Without clear standards, player valuations can legitimately diverge by tens of millions, allowing clubs to manipulate these valuations to meet financial rules instead of improving real finances.

Closing loopholes on operating spend and debt may inadvertently open a larger one around player valuations, which are harder to audit and easier to manipulate.

Will these changes work?

The two key components shaping the Premier League’s path are the SCR, a cap-like limit tied to football revenue, and SSR, which measures liquidity, working capital, and equity strength to secure financial health.

Ultimately, the question is whether these changes will deliver the desired financial transparency, or just create new loopholes.

A traditional hard salary cap for Premier League clubs remains unlikely. The Professional Footballers’ Association has warned it would unlawfully restrict trade, and leading legal opinions argue rigid caps risk breaching UK or EU employment and competition law and don’t fit a football pyramid system.

The Premier League’s innovative approach could set a benchmark, but we will have to wait and see if it becomes a yardstick for other leagues.

The Conversation

The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. How England’s Premier League is trying to stop football’s financial arms race – without a salary cap – https://theconversation.com/how-englands-premier-league-is-trying-to-stop-footballs-financial-arms-race-without-a-salary-cap-270666

Long-sought environmental law reform is finally here. But will the compromise deal actually protect nature?

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Justine Bell-James, Professor, TC Beirne School of Law, The University of Queensland

Brayden Stanford/Pexels, CC BY-NC-ND

Today is a landmark day for environmental law. After years of false starts and abandoned promises, Labor has finally struck a deal with the Greens to pass long-awaited changes to the federal Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act. The laws are expected to pass the Senate today – the final parliamentary sitting day of the year.

Change is long overdue, as the 25-year-old laws have been shown to be not fit for purpose. Australia’s unique species and ecosystems are in real trouble. Threatened species populations are falling year after year, while climate change is driving species to extinction and ecosystems towards collapse.

Significantly, neither Labor nor the Greens are declaring the bill a complete success. In its second reading today, Labor Senator Michelle Ananda-Rajah described the bill as “not perfect”, while the Greens described it as falling “woefully short” on climate.

Environment Minister Murray Watt was negotiating with both the Coalition and the Greens to pass the laws. While the Greens agreed to the deal and extracted key concessions on native forest protections, Watt has left some wins for business and the Liberal Party.

The compromise deal is indeed far from perfect. But after five years of stalled reforms, it’s clear significant compromise was the only way for the laws to pass.

What was in the original reform bill?

In late October, Labor introduced reforms that proposed a slew of changes to existing environment laws.

These included provisions for:

  • making national environmental standards to guide decision-making
  • a new federal environmental protection agency
  • planning at a bioregional scale to assess cumulative damage across a landscape

These changes were broadly positive. But other elements raised considerable concern, namely:

  • considerable ministerial discretion over whether to apply the new national environmental standards to development applications
  • a wide-ranging national interest exemption allowing the government to fast-track projects in the undefined “national interest”
  • fast-tracking for some decisions
  • allowing developers to pay into a “restoration fund” to compensate for biodiversity loss despite evidence it worsens biodiversity loss
  • excluding native forest logging from Commonwealth oversight
  • plans to devolve environmental decision-making to states, with the pro-mining and anti-regulation Western Australian government the first in line.

The original 500-page draft bill had areas of considerable uncertainty, such as requiring the minister to knock back developments if satisfied they would have “unacceptable impacts”. The idea was sound: create red lines where projects don’t have to be considered if damage to the environment would be too great. But the definitions were confusing and subjective.

For instance, an “unacceptable impact” on a critically endangered species was defined as one that “seriously impairs, will seriously impair, or is likely to seriously impair” species viability. But “seriously impair” was nebulously defined as “something if, compared to the action not being taken, the impact results in the thing being seriously altered for the worse”. Industry criticised this for setting the bar too low, fearing it would stop projects in their tracks.

What concessions have the Greens secured?

While the Labor-Greens deal means the bills can now pass the Senate, it hasn’t fundamentally changed what was introduced by Labor. The concessions include:

  • better protection for native forests
  • banning fast-tracking of new coal and gas projects
  • reining in ministerial discretion.

The Greens are claiming their major concession is the removal of a longstanding exemption for the logging industry for areas of native forest covered by Regional Forest Agreements. Forested areas under these agreements currently have no protection from federal environment laws.

Under the changes, these agreements will have to comply with the laws and meet higher standards within 18 months. The deal contains compensation for forestry workers. This is a clear win for the environment.

The Greens also secured modest progress on climate, but far short of their long-sought climate trigger, which was a non-starter for Labor.

Instead, the bill will be amended to remove coal and gas projects from fast-tracked approvals and to prevent the minister from declaring these to be projects to be in the “national interest”.

Crucially, the Greens claim the deal will tighten ministerial discretion. The original reforms said the minister “must be satisfied” a decision is “not inconsistent with” the National Environmental Standards. This gave the environment minister of the day wide leeway to depart from the standards and approve projects. The Greens are claiming a major win here by changing the language from “not inconsistent with” these standards to “consistent with”. This isn’t semantics – it’s a stricter legal test.

The amendments will also bring more land clearing under the environment assessment regime and allow the minister to declare some matters too important to be offset by paying into the new Restoration Contributions Fund. This could be a potentially important safeguard.

Wins for the Liberals?

In recent months, Watt has pitched these reforms as a win for the environment and for business, which would benefit from faster approvals. But businesses were wary of the nebulous concept of “unacceptable impacts”.

It looks like Liberal Senator Jonathon Duniam’s proposed changes to the definition of “unacceptable impacts” have been supported.

The definition of an “unacceptable impact” on a critically endangered species has been pared back to “seriously impairs […] viability”. This means projects can’t be knocked back if they are only likely to seriously impair viability.

“Seriously impair” has now been redefined as “something if, compared to the action not being taken, the impact results in an impairment or alteration of the thing that is of a severe nature and extent”. These are terms requiring subjective interpretation, but “severe nature” may make it harder to reject projects than “seriously altered for the worse”.

Will the new legislation stem the damage to nature?

The bar for improvement is low. Australia’s current environment laws are riddled with administrative discretion. Many projects are never assessed, and 99% of projects assessed under these laws are given the green light.

The revised bill contains some key elements proposed by the scathing 2020 Samuel Review, such as provision for National Environmental Standards, while the concessions won by the Greens reduce ministerial discretion. Samuel described today’s deal as a “great balance” between environment and business concerns.

Much will be up in the air even after these laws pass. The government has only drafted two of the many environmental standards anticipated, one on matters of national environmental significance and one on environmental offsets. It remains to be seen whether these standards will improve decision-making, and they are also not yet finalised. Major questions around the interpretation of language in the new laws may need to be hashed out in future court proceedings.

The Greens were unable to remove Labor’s new “pay to destroy” from the laws. This is a significant concern, as the controversial ability for developers to pay into a restoration fund will likely be seen as the easy route. This mechanism is already up and running in New South Wales, with poor outcomes.

What now?

These reforms are the end of a tortuous process – and the start of another, far bigger, job. To be successful, they will need to be coupled with far greater public investment and rigorous enforcement.

The true test of these reforms will be whether we succeed in the ultimate act of conserving and recovering the wildlife and places Australians know and love.

The Conversation

Justine Bell-James receives funding from the Australian Research Council, the Great Barrier Reef Foundation, the Queensland Government, and the National Environmental Science Program. She is a Director of the National Environmental Law Association and a member of the Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists.

Euan is a Councillor within the Biodiversity Council, a member of the Ecological Society of Australia and president of the Australian Mammal Society.

Phillipa C. McCormack receives funding from the Australian Research Council, Natural Hazards Research Australia, the National Environmental Science Program, Green Adelaide, the North East NSW Forestry Hub and the ACT government. She is a member of the National Environmental Law Association and International Association of Wildland Fire and affiliated with the Wildlife Crime Research Hub.

Yung En Chee receives/has received funding from the Australian Research Council. She also receives funding and research contracts from Melbourne Water through the Melbourne Waterway Research-Practice Partnership 2023-2028. Yung En is a member of the Society for Conservation Biology.

ref. Long-sought environmental law reform is finally here. But will the compromise deal actually protect nature? – https://theconversation.com/long-sought-environmental-law-reform-is-finally-here-but-will-the-compromise-deal-actually-protect-nature-270775

Turning old bread into flour and then into tasty tortillas

Source: Radio New Zealand

What started with a “stir crazy” chef armed with a Nutribullet during lockdown, is now an award-winning company looking to tackle a major element of the country’s food waste problem.

Rescued Kitchen is aiming to cut down on one food most commonly ending up in the bin – bread – which it is turning back into the very flour it was made from.

This week it was revealed Kiwis are wasting over one million tonnes of food each year.

While the business is currently only able to make a small dent in this number, a major upscaling operation means they are hoping to eventually take a mighty slice out of the country’s food waste.

Royce Bold, the inventor of Rescued Bread Flour, admits taking bread back to the main ingredient it started as is not an easy idea to get your head around.

He said while it may be scientific, it is not rocket science.

“Bread is pretty much 70% wheat, 30% water, a little bit of yeast salt and sugar, that’s good old-fashioned bread.”

“We dehydrate the bread, and once it’s got the right water activity it’s then ground into a fine power, it’s then sieved and that’s when it becomes bread flour.”

From there, the flour goes into cakes, biscuits, baking mixes and more, acting as a more sustainable substitute to a regular flour.

With the flour and the various treats it is made from now being supplied to hotels, catering companies and other businesses, it is fair to say things have come a long way since Bold first came up with the idea.

“Basically, I made the first batch of bread flour during lockdown in my oven and a Nutribullet and it was one of those ‘what the’ moments.”

The bread is donated by supermarkets two days before its sell-by date.

While it doesn’t act exactly like the flour people are used to, Bold said it has it’s own unique selling points.

“The first thing I made out of it was a sweet pastry and it rolled really well which I was quite amazed with, and then when I cooked it, it had a really unique oatiness to it and a really short crumble to it and it was kind of a taste sensation, and then from there I was like this has got limitless applications.”

Five years later, Bold isn’t the only one enjoying the recycled flour.

When Arturo Luna from Remarkable Tortillas was approached by Bold with the idea to try out a batch of tortillas using the bread flour, he didn’t hesitate to jump on board.

It hasn’t all been smooth sailing, Luna said he has lost track of the number of tweaks that have been made since the first trial.

“It wasn’t a straight path, we were doing a good job at the beginning and said yeah it’s working, but one thing is you finish a product and it looks nice, then you also have the shelf life of the tortilla is important, and the texture and the flavour and the actual product itself not moulding, there’s so many variants.”

But after all that trial and error, the tortillas have exceeded all expectations, with the company planning to soon produce their smallest tortilla size using only recycled flour.

“From the feedback we have been getting, the flavour is better than a usual flour tortilla, and it has a more rich flavour, it has a little bit of bread flavour in there which makes it nicer than just a flour tortilla, it’s nice and soft, and it’s sustainable.”

Bold said it is collaborations like these that have allowed them to continue to scale up.

Now they’re not just saving bread.

Twice a week a huge shipment of tomatoes arrives.

Too red, too orange, or too green, too small, too wonky or just not quite right. To the naked eye they look delicious, but they are not good enough to make into onto the supermarket shelves.

While they used to be binned, the Rescued Kitchen transforms them into chutneys, relishes, and the sauce that ends up in school lunches around the country.

But Bold said it is still just the beginning.

“So far we’ve rescued about 200 tonnes of bread, which is quite substantial, but unfortunately it’s just the tip of the iceberg.”

The current process to make the bread flour can take up to a week to make 400kg of the flour, and the time makes the product expensive.

Now the team are partway through upscaling to different system that can process one tonne of bread a day.

“We’ve done a bit of difference, but the only way that we can truly make a difference in the food waste problem that’s facing our planet, not just NZ but our whole planet is by scale.”

The team at Rescued Kitchen hopes to have an upscaled production system up and running by early next year.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Finance Minister urges banks to slash home loan rates after latest OCR cut

Source: Radio New Zealand

Finance minister Nicola Willis said banks should pass on as much as possible. (File photo) Nick Monro

Finance Minister Nicola Willis has urged banks to slash their home loan rates by passing on “as much as possible” of the latest cut to the official cash rate (OCR).

Banks began dropping floating rates on Wednesday after the Reserve Bank cut the OCR by 25 basis points, as expected, to 2.25 percent, the lowest since June 2022.

Speaking in Auckland on Thursday, Willis said the Reserve Bank would monitor how banks responded to the OCR cut, but she hoped it would flow through to mortgage-holders.

“My message to the New Zealand banks is a very clear one: pass on as much as possible,” she said.

“When you do, that makes a significant difference to our economy. And actually, as some of New Zealand’s biggest businesses, you have a stake in this economy. So pass those rates on.”

In its forecasts released on Wednesday, the central bank said the risks for inflation were “balanced”.

Willis told reporters she expected the economy to pick up and inflation to come down even more next year, meaning a real difference to the cost-of-living.

“Conditions are going to get easier for a lot of New Zealand workers and families,” she said.

“All of the data and indicators I’m seeing tell me that next year will be a lot better.”

Willis accepted people were under “no obligation” to believe her analysis until they started feeling the improvement for themselves.

“New Zealanders have been very resilient,” she said. “Your efforts are not in vain… we have better times ahead of us.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Judge Ema Aitken has bid for legal clarity rejected before conduct hearing

Source: Radio New Zealand

Judge Ema Aitken allegedly shouted NZ First leader Winston Peters was lying. RNZ Insight/Dan Cook

A judge accused of disrupting a New Zealand First event has had her bid for legal clarity rejected.

District Court Judge Ema Aitken was accused of disrupting a function at the exclusive Northern Club in Auckland last November, allegedly shouting leader Winston Peters was lying.

She argued she didn’t shout, she didn’t recognise Mr Peters’ voice when she responded to remarks she overheard and she didn’t know it was a political event.

A judicial conduct panel – made up of retired Court of Appeal Judge Brendan Brown KC (chair), sitting Court of Appeal Judge Justice Jillian Mallon and former Governor-General Sir Jerry Mateparae – will review Judge Aitken’s conduct at a hearing next year.

This week, at a preliminary hearing in Wellington, Judge Aitken’s lawyer, David Jones KC, sought to clarify the legal test for judicial misconduct justifying removal from the bench.

“You have to have something to aim at, you have to have something to establish,” he said. “Here we have the difference – for example – between misconduct and misbehaviour, and we have to know how egregious that has to be, in order for the contemplation of removal to be considered.”

Special counsel Jonathan Orpin-Dowell, one of two lawyers presenting allegations of misconduct to the panel, replied that parliament didn’t intend to set a threshold for misbehaviour.

In a decision released this week, panel chair Brown KC said he wouldn’t decide on a legal test before the hearing, when each case depended on its own facts.

“In the circumstances where we have not read any briefs of evidence, we are currently operating in a factual vacuum,” he said. “In any event, we cannot make findings of facts, until we have heard the evidence [including cross-examination] at the hearing.”

There wasn’t any prejudice against Judge Aitken by not ruling on a legal test, as she has the statement of allegations made against her, Brown KC said.

Judge Aitken’s lawyers sought clarity over the word “heckled” in the allegations made against her, saying the Oxford Dictionary‘s meaning of “interrupting a public speaker with derisive or aggressive comments” wasn’t appropriate for the circumstances.

The request was declined by the panel, who agreed with the opposing lawyers that the word would be considered in the hearing.

Jones KC also sought to clarify the level of knowledge or intention which would need to be established at the hearing.

The Special Counsel said the allegations against the Judge were that she “either knew, or in the alternative, ought to have known she was commenting on politically contentious matters” when she spoke at the event.

Jones KC argued the hearing would need to establish Judge Aitken knew of the political context when she spoke at the event – not what she, as a judge, ought to have known.

He questioned whether the lawyers were making an allegation of dishonesty against the judge in their case against her, but the special counsel submissions were that there was no specific allegation of dishonesty against the judge.

The panel said the question of what the judge knew would be considered in the hearing and it wouldn’t make a ruling on it in advance.

The judicial conduct panel will consider Judge Aitken’s behaviour at a hearing in February.

It will determine facts and write a report to the g-eneral, including whether the removal of the judge is justified.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

The Hong Kong high-rise fire shows how difficult it is to evacuate in an emergency

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Milad Haghani, Associate Professor and Principal Fellow in Urban Risk and Resilience, The University of Melbourne

Tommy Wang/Getty

The Hong Kong high-rise fire, which spread across multiple buildings in a large residential complex, has killed dozens, with hundreds reported missing.

The confirmed death toll is now 44, with close to 300 people still unaccounted for and dozens in hospital with serious injuries.

This makes it one of Hong Kong’s deadliest building fires in living memory, and already the worst since the Garley Building fire in 1996.

Although more than 900 people have been reportedly evacuated from the Wang Fuk Court, it’s not clear how many residents remain trapped.

This catastrophic fire – which is thought to have spread from building to building via burning bamboo scaffolding and fanned by strong winds – highlights how difficult it is to evacuate high-rise buildings in an emergency.

When the stakes are highest

Evacuations of high-rises don’t happen every day, but occur often enough. And when they do, the consequences are almost always severe. The stakes are highest in the buildings that are full at predictable times: residential towers at night, office towers in the day.

We’ve seen this in the biggest modern examples, from the World Trade Center in the United States to Grenfell Tower in the United Kingdom.

The patterns repeat: once a fire takes hold, getting thousands of people safely down dozens of storeys becomes a race against time.

But what actually makes evacuating a high-rise building so challenging?

It isn’t just a matter of “getting people out”. It’s a collision between the physical limits of the building and the realities of human behaviour under stress.

It’s a long way down to safety

The biggest barrier is simply vertical distance. Stairwells are the only reliable escape route in most buildings.

Stair descent in real evacuations is far slower than most people expect. Under controlled or drill conditions people move down at around 0.4–0.7 metres per second. But in an actual emergency, especially in high-rise fires, this can drop sharply.

During 9/11, documented speeds at which survivors went down stairs were often slower than 0.3 m/s. These slow-downs accumulate dramatically over long vertical distances.

Fatigue is a major factor. Prolonged walking significantly reduces the speed of descent. Surveys conducted after incidents confirm that a large majority of high-rise evacuees stop at least once. During the 2010 fire of a high-rise in Shanghai, nearly half of older survivors reported slowing down significantly.

Long stairwells, landings, and the geometry of high-rise stairs all contribute to congestion, especially when flows from multiple floors merge into a single shaft.

Slower movers include older adults, people with physical or mobility issues and groups evacuating together. These reduce the overall pace of descent compared with the speeds typically assumed for able-bodied individuals. This can create bottlenecks. Slow movers are especially relevant in residential buildings, where diverse occupants mean movement speeds vary widely.

Visibility matters too. Experimental studies show that reduced lighting significantly slows down people going down stairs. This suggests that when smoke reduces visibility in real events, movement can slow even further as people hesitate, misjudge steps, or adjust their speed.

Human behaviour can lead to delays

Human behaviour is one of the biggest sources of delay in high-rise evacuations. People rarely act immediately when an alarm sounds. They pause, look for confirmation, check conditions, gather belongings, or coordinate with family members.

These early minutes are consistently some of the costliest when evacuating from tall buildings.

Studies of the World Trade Center evacuations show the more cues people saw – smoke, shaking, noise – the more they sought extra information before moving. That search for meaning adds delay. People talk to colleagues, look outside windows, phone family, or wait for an announcement. Ambiguous cues slow them even further.

In residential towers, families, neighbours and friend-groups naturally try to evacuate together. Groups tend to form wider steps, or group together in shapes that reduce overall flow. But our research shows when a group moves in a “snake” formation – one behind the other – they travel faster, occupy less space, and allow others to pass more easily.

These patterns matter in high-rise housing, where varied household types and mixed abilities make moving in groups the norm.

Why stairs aren’t enough

As high-rises grow taller and populations age, the old assumption that “everyone can take the stairs” simply no longer holds. A full building evacuation can take too long, and for many residents (older adults, people with mobility limitations, families evacuating together) long stair descents are sometimes impossible.

This is why many countries have turned to refuge floors: fire- and smoke-protected levels built into towers as safe staging points. These can reduce bottlenecks and prevent long queues. They give people somewhere safe to rest, transfer across to a clearer stair, or wait for firefighters. Essentially, they make vertical movement more manageable in buildings where continuous descent isn’t realistic.

Alongside them are evacuation elevators. These are lifts engineered to operate during a fire with pressurised shafts, protected lobbies and backup power. The most efficient evacuations use a mix of stairs and elevators, with ratios adjusted to the building height, density and demographics.

The lesson is clear: high-rise evacuation cannot rely on one tool. Stairs, refuge floors and protected elevators should all be made part of ensuring vertical living is safer.

The Conversation

Erica Kuligowski is affiliated with the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE) as a Section Editor for their Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering (Human Behaviour Section) and as a member of the Board of Governors for the SFPE Foundation. From 2002 to 2020, Erica worked as a research engineer and social scientist in the Engineering Laboratory of NIST, where she contributed to NIST’s Technical Investigation of the 2001 WTC Disaster and received US government funding to study occupant evacuation elevators.

Ruggiero Lovreglio receives funding from the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (New Zealand), Royal Society Te Apārangi (New Zealand) and NIST (USA)

Milad Haghani does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. The Hong Kong high-rise fire shows how difficult it is to evacuate in an emergency – https://theconversation.com/the-hong-kong-high-rise-fire-shows-how-difficult-it-is-to-evacuate-in-an-emergency-270774

Unions call for Luxon to step in and resolve collective bargaining impasses

Source: Radio New Zealand

A letter has been sent to the Prime Minister. RNZ / Mark Papalii

Unions want the Prime Minister to step in and resolve their collective bargaining impasses, frustrated that progress is not being made.

The joint letter to Christopher Luxon was signed by the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists, New Zealand Nurses Organisation, New Zealand Professional Firefighters Union, Post Primary Teachers’ Association, NZEI Te Riu Roa, and the Public Service Association.

“The recent strike action, rallies and marches is evidence of that frustration on the part of union members. At those rallies and marches there was a clear call for the government to listen to those workforces and to urgently make progress on the matters relating to those workforces and the bargaining,” the letter said.

“We believe that it is appropriate in these circumstances for the Prime Minister to step in and meet with the unions’ leaders to explore possible ways forward and settlement options. While there are different issues in each sector we see there is sufficient commonality across the bargaining to make that an appropriate step.”

The unions believed the prime minister’s intervention would mean the impasses could be moved on, and bargaining could be concluded satisfactorily for all parties.

The prime minister’s office confirmed to RNZ the letter had been received, and said the sender would be responded to directly.

More than 100,000 people walked off the job last month, despite rallies in some parts of the country not going ahead due to weather.

Last month, Luxon heavily criticised the organisers of the strike, saying it was “politically motivated” and he felt no need to meet with them.

“The negotiations, the terms and conditions, are done between the Public Service Commissioner doing the centralised bargaining and also the CEO of Health New Zealand, who are the employers, with the respective unions,” he said at the time.

The strike was held on the same day as former Prime Minister Jim Bolger’s funeral, which Luxon attended instead.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Businesses outraged at local board vote against having more events at Auckland’s Eden Park

Source: Radio New Zealand

Metallica play at Auckland's Eden Park, November, 2025.

Metallica playing at Auckland’s Eden Park last week. (File photo) Tom Grut

A local community board has voted against having more concerts at Auckland’s Eden Park, angering a local business association.

The government wants to boost the number of gigs allowed at the venue to 12 large and 20 medium concerts a year. At the moment it was limited to six artists playing a total of 12 gigs a year.

RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop wrote to Auckland Council with an eye on loosening restrictions on Eden Park’s operations which he said were costing hundreds of millions of dollars in lost revenue.

The government was now seeking feedback from the public and council on the findings.

The Albert-Eden local board has voted no to supporting that plan, which infuriated the Dominion Rd Business Association.

The association’s manager Gary Holmes told Checkpoint the decision was “economic vandalism” in his eyes.

“We’ve got business on Dominion Rd fighting to survive a rescission and here we’ve got a local board turning away $250,000 of economic stimulus for our area alone per event and they’re ignoring their own voters.

“We know over 70 percent of locals support more concerts. It’s not just out of touch with businesses but out of touch with reality.”

Holmes said the association had market view data that had shown the impact of spending over time.

“For example, when Coldplay played last year our dining revenue jumped by 25 percent.

“Because we’re competing with Sydney and Melbourne it’s crazy to turn away that kind of money due to restrictions on Eden Park.”

Holmes said the local board needed to listen to residents who wanted a “vibrant city”.

“We want to be a destination.”

Eden Park’s CEO Nick Sautner told Morning Report on Thursday morning, the national stadium was being “hampered by a bureaucracy of restrictions”.

“If I was the CEO of a toll road or a shopping centre and had 90 percent idle capacity people would be asking questions. My idle capacity is a result of our constraints and so, Chris Bishop’s initiative to implement these changes enables business to do business.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Health Minister Simeon Brown demands revamped decision-making from Health NZ

Source: Radio New Zealand

Simeon Brown expects Health NZ to revise policy by 31 December. RNZ / Mark Papalii

The health minister has told Health New Zealand he wants more of a focus on decision-making closer to the frontline and expects a plan by the end of the year.

Simeon Brown’s letter of expectations to chair Lester Levy sets out the government’s priorities for 2026/27 and his feedback on the 2025/26 year so far.

“It is clear to me that Health NZ is too centralised,” Brown wrote. “Too many decisions are made by people who are removed from the problems that frontline clinicians are trying to solve.

“This is causing significant frustration for local districts and stifling innovation, which could lead to efficiencies, which deliver more care for patients within the budgets, which have been set.”

Brown said he expected Health New Zealand to develop policy by 31 December, showing how it planned to devolve decision-making to regions and districts.

The government re-established the Health New Zealand governance board in July, with Levy moving from his commissioner role to chair.

On Thursday, it was revealed hospitals in Wellington were waiting up to six months for Health New Zealand approval to begin recruitment for frontline roles.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Barnaby Joyce quits Nationals, as he eyes One Nation Senate seat

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

Barnaby Joyce has finally announced he is quitting the Nationals Party, declaring he is “strongly considering” running for a Senate seat for One Nation in New South Wales at the next election.

But the maverick MP is not switching to One Nation immediately, despite widespread expectations and his much-publicised tete-a-tete dinner with party leader Pauline Hanson earlier this week.

Joyce announced his resignation from the Nationals in a brief speech to the House of Representatives before question time on Thursday, and elaborated to the media afterwards.

He told the House that where he sat in the chamber was the “ejection seat. It’s about as far away as you can get from the despatch box. And if you’re sitting here, they want you out there.”

He said in the past he had been asked to leave twice by former opposition leader Peter Dutton. He also again made clear his resentment about how he had been treated by Nationals Leader David Littleproud.

He said apart from a 90-second conversation with Littleproud – after he announced several weeks ago that he wouldn’t recontest his New England seat and would not attend partyroom meetings – he had had no communication with the leader or deputy leader of the Nationals.

“So that’s disappointing. So after 30 years with the National Party, I am resigning from the party. And that leaves me with a heavy heart. And I apologise for all of the hurt that that will cause. I really do.”

Joyce has had a mixture of entreaties to stay and criticism from Nationals colleagues in recent weeks, amid the speculation about his future move to One Nation.

Joyce started his parliamentary career in the Senate in 2005 after winning a Queensland Senate seat at the 2004 election. He made it clear on Thursday that he would like to enjoy the potential power that being a crossbench senator could bring.

“It’s the appeal also of the Senate, of just review[ing] and amend[ing] legislation. […]You’d have to come to me on each piece of legislation and say ‘what are your views?’ I’ve done the Senate before – eight years, seven months and a day. I know that I know the job.”

In a tumultuous career in the Nationals, Joyce led the party twice, and served twice as deputy prime minister.

Michelle Grattan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. Barnaby Joyce quits Nationals, as he eyes One Nation Senate seat – https://theconversation.com/barnaby-joyce-quits-nationals-as-he-eyes-one-nation-senate-seat-270798

How to cool your house down without turning on the heat pump

Source: Radio New Zealand

Feeling the heat? Keeping the air conditioning on full blast might feel tempting, but your bank account won’t thank you for it.

Luckily, ventilation experts Stephen McNeil and Dr Manfred Plagmann have a few tips on how to cool your house naturally – without the sky-high energy bill.

“The fundamental issue is really solar gain, it’s the sun coming in through your windows that’s the main reason your building’s getting too hot,” explains McNeil, a senior building scientist at the Building Research Association of New Zealand (BRANZ).

BRANZ ventilation experts Stephen McNeil and Dr Manfred Plagmann have a few tips on how to cool your house down this summer.

Supplied / Becky Collins

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Seats vanish from bus stops across Auckland, AT yet to file police report

Source: Radio New Zealand

Benches have been disappearing from bus shelters across Auckland. Supplied/ Jon Turner

Benches are being stolen from bus shelters across Auckland but the city’s transport agency has yet to file an official report to police despite knowing about the issue for three weeks.

Auckland Transport told RNZ it was aware of benches being removed from about 65 of the city’s 3000 bus stops.

“It’s possible these benches are being sold as scrap metal. We are in the process of sourcing benches constructed from different materials making them difficult to graffiti and a less desirable scrap product,” said its manager of public transport real time and response, Rebecca Temple.

Temple said it’s unfortunate that anti-theft bolting on the seats wasn’t able to stop them being removed.

AT said in a statement that it “notified” police about three weeks ago, when it first became aware of the seats going missing.

But it said it’s yet to file a formal report.

“We have not filed a formal police report because we are still gathering information on the sites where seats have gone missing to include in a report to police,” it said.

“We have been gathering information on all 3000 bus shelters to try and understand the full extent of the issue across the network. This is due to be filed in the next day or so,” said AT.

“We work with the police daily and so lodging this complaint is just the formality not the reality. We sit together in our operations centre,” it added.

Meanwhile, a police spokesperson said they were not “immediately aware” of bus stop benches being stolen.

One of the shelters where there is nowhere to sit. Supplied/Jon Turner

‘Are they just waiting for more to be stolen?’

Puketāpapa Local Board member Jon Turner said he first noticed the missing benches when going for a run down Mount Eden Road, and spotted eight missing.

Since he posted to social media, he’s received reports of others missing in Sandringham, Avondale and around Greenwoods Corner on Manukau Road.

Turner said AT should be taking action now, rather than waiting longer to make a police report.

“How long are they going to keep waiting to make a report, when the things have already been stolen?

“Are they just waiting for more to be stolen to add to the list?,” he said.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Series of scrub fires break out in Otago and Southland

Source: Radio New Zealand

A scrub fire in Palmerston. Supplied / Martin Neame

Fire crews and helicopters are battling a series of scrub fires in Otago and Southland fanned by strong winds.

In Southland, nine trucks and two helicopters were tackling a forestry block fire near Mataura that broke out about 2.10pm.

The fire has closed State Highway 96 between State Highway 1 and Waimumu. It is expected to remain closed overnight.

In Palmerston, six trucks and three helicopters were dealing with a fire in pine trees near Goodwood.

Four crews were also called to a paddock fire in Papakaio in the Waitaki district sparked by a trampoline blowing into powerlines.

Two crews were working on a smouldering tree near Whitstone.

The wind blew three branches onto two cars in Oamaru but Fire and Emergency (FENZ) said a dog in one of the cars was not hurt.

A paddock fire that broke out on Johnston Road on the outskirts of Balclutha about 1pm has been contained.

FENZ said 30 firefighters on the ground and two helicopters with monsoon buckets were now working to put it out.

People are advised to avoid the area and said anyone affected by smoke should close their windows and doors and stay inside if possible.

Fire and Emergency had warned people to avoid lighting fires outdoors in Otago on Thursday and Friday because of warm, windy conditions.

Paid firefighters were due to strike around the country on Friday by walking off the job from 12pm to 1pm.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

- ADVERT -

MIL PODCASTS
Bookmark
| Follow | Subscribe Listen on Apple Podcasts

Foreign policy + Intel + Security

Subscribe | Follow | Bookmark
and join Buchanan & Manning LIVE Thursdays @ midday

MIL Public Webcast Service


- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -