Page 16

Public criticism of staff by Dunedin City councillor serious breach of code of conduct

Source: Radio New Zealand

Benedict Ong complained about the staff member to the council’s chief executive and two journalists. Supplied

A Dunedin City councillor was in serious breach of the council’s code of conduct when he publicly criticised a staff member, an independent investigator has found.

Benedict Ong sent an email complaining about the staff member’s performance to the council’s chief executive and two local journalists in February.

Dunedin councillors are set to consider possible sanctions for Ong at a meeting on 25 March, which could include a demand for a public apology or a vote of no confidence.

Ong will also be given a chance to defend himself.

The independent investigation led by barrister Steph Dyhrberg found that Ong’s actions could have been a deliberate attempt to retaliate against the staff member and discredit her.

“By disclosing the allegations to the media, Cr Ong breached the requirements to treat all employees with courtesy and respect and avoid publicly criticising any employee,” she said.

Councillor Ong had earlier filed his own code of conduct complaint against councillor John Chambers, saying he had made inappropriate remarks during a meeting.

An investigator reviewed the evidence, including a transcript of a phone call with a council staff member, and found that Ong’s version of events was not supported.

The complaint was dismissed because it lacked substance.

On 4 February Ong wrote to the chief executive and journalists accusing the council staff member of “apparent political bias” and a “lack of political neutrality”.

While he did not name the staff member, she was found to be “readily identifiable” to journalists.

Dyhrberg said Ong had already been put on notice several times about maintaining confidentiality.

“It is reasonable to infer Cr Ong knew what he was doing was inappropriate,” she said.

“No-one should be victimised or discredited for agreeing to participate in a code of conduct complaint process.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Iraq war’s aftermath was a disaster for the US – the Iran war is headed in the same direction

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Farah N. Jan, Senior Lecturer in International Relations, University of Pennsylvania

The United States military achieved every objective it set when it went to war in Iraq in 2003. Decapitation: Saddam Hussein was captured, tried and hanged. Air dominance: total, within days. Regime collapse: The Iraqi government fell in 21 days.

Now, consider Iraq more than 20 years after the U.S.-Iraq war. Iraq is still an authoritarian state governed by political parties with deep institutional ties to Tehran. Iranian-backed militias operate openly on Iraqi soil – some holding official positions within the Iraqi state.

The country the U.S. spent US$2 trillion and 4,488 American lives to remake is, by any reasonable measure, within the sphere of Iran’s influence.

As an international security scholar specializing in nuclear security and alliance politics in the Middle East, I have tracked the pattern of U.S. military success across multiple cases.

But the military outcome and the political outcome are almost never the same thing, and the gap between them is where wars fail.

Two and a half millennia ago, Thucydides recorded the Athenian empire at its most confident in his “History of the Peloponnesian War”: “The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.” Athens then destroyed Melos and launched the Sicily Expedition with overwhelming force and no coherent theory of governance for what came next.

The lesson, then and now, is not that empires cannot destroy. It’s that destruction and governance are entirely different enterprises. And confusing them is how empires exhaust themselves.

The U.S. military can destroy the Iranian regime. The question that the Iraq precedent answers – with brutal clarity – is what fills the power vacuum when it does?

The military and political ledger

In April 2003, American L. Paul Bremer arrived in Baghdad as the head of the Coalition Provisional Authority, which served as a transitional government, and issued two orders that would define the next two decades.

Order 1 dissolved the ruling Baath Party and removed all senior party members from their government positions, purging the administrative class that ran its ministries, hospitals and schools. Order 2 disbanded the Iraqi army but did not disarm it. Approximately 400,000 soldiers went home with their weapons and without their paychecks.

Washington had just handed the insurgency – the Sunni-led armed resistance that would turn into a decade-long war – its recruiting pool. The logic behind Bremer’s de-Baathification was intuitive: You cannot build a new Iraq with the people who built the old one. The logic was also catastrophic

A man in a suit and tie walks in a desert.

L. Paul Bremer prepares to board a helicopter in Hillah, Iraq, during a farewell tour of the country on June 17, 2004. AP Photo/Wathiq Khuzaie

Political scientists have long observed that countries are held together not by ideology but by organized coercion. That is, by the bureaucratic machinery, institutional memory and trained professionals who keep the lights on and the water running. Destroy that machinery, and you do not have a clean slate. You have a collapsed state, and collapsed states do not stay empty of leadership.

They fill, and they fill with whoever has the most organizational capacity on the ground. Iran had been building that capacity in Iraq since the 1980s, cultivating Shia political networks, exile parties and militia groups during and after the Iran-Iraq War and beyond with the explicit goal of ensuring a post-Saddam Iraq would never again threaten Iranian security.

Tehran did not need to build infrastructure in Iraq after the U.S. invasion, because it had spent the previous two decades building it. When the old order collapsed, Iran’s networks were ready.

The opposition the U.S. had cultivated in IraqAhmed Chalabi and the Iraqi National Congress – had Washington’s ear but no Iraqi constituency. They had not governed the country, or built networks inside it.

The lesson is that military success created the precise conditions for political catastrophe, and that chasm is where American strategy has gone to die – in Iraq and in Libya, where the Obama administration helped bring about regime change in 2011, but where political instability has endured since. And perhaps now in Iran.

The vacuum is not neutral

The fundamental misunderstanding at the heart of American regime-change strategy is the assumption that destroying the existing order creates space for something better.

It does not.

It creates space for whoever is best organized, best armed and most willing to fill it. In Iraq, that was Iran.

The question now is who fills it in Iran itself.

In Iran, the group that meets all three criteria – organized, armed and willing – is the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The Revolutionary Guard is not simply a military institution. It controls an estimated 30% to 40% of the Iranian economy and runs construction conglomerates, telecommunications companies and petrochemical firms. And it has cultivated a parallel state infrastructure for decades.

Since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s death at the start of the U.S.-Israeli bombing campaign, the Revolutionary Guard has taken effective control of decision-making. As one Iran expert told NBC News: “Even if they replace the supreme leader, what is left of the regime is the IRGC.”

The succession confirmed it: Mojtaba Khamenei, with deep ties to the Revolutionary Guard, was named supreme leader on March 8, 2026. It’s a Revolutionary Guard-backed dynastic succession that represents maximum continuity with the old regime, not regime change.

You cannot dismantle the Revolutionary Guard without collapsing the economy, and a collapsed economy does not produce a transition government; it produces a failed state. Washington has already run that experiment in Libya.

You cannot leave the Revolutionary Guard in place without leaving the regime’s coercive core intact. There is no clean surgical option of dropping bombs, killing certain people and declaring it a new day in Iran.

The Iranian opposition in exile, the Mujahedeen-e-Khalq; the monarchists who support the return of the late-shah’s son to lead the country; and the various democratic factions all present the same problem Chalabi did in 2003: Washington access, no domestic legitimacy.

Military men holding rifles march on a street.

Revolutionary Guard troops march in a military rally in Tehran on Jan. 10, 2025. Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images

The Mujahedeen-e-Khalq is listed as a terrorist organization by Iran and is widely despised inside the country. The monarchist movement has not governed Iran since 1979, and its corrupt, despotic leader was overthrown in the revolution. The democratic reform networks that had been building momentum inside Iran were not saved by the U.S. strikes. The regime had already crushed the movement in January, detaining and killing thousands.

Decades of research on rally-around-the-flag effects confirm what common sense suggests: External attack fuses regime and nation even when citizens despise their leaders. Iranians who were chanting against the supreme leader are now watching foreign bombs fall on their cities.

Iraq in 2003 had 25 million people, a military degraded by 12 years of sanctions, and no active nuclear program. Iran has 92 million people, proxy networks that would not disappear if Tehran fell – in fact, they would activate – and a stockpile of over 880 pounds of highly enriched uranium that the International Atomic Energy Agency has been unable to fully account for since the 2025 U.S. and Israeli strikes.

The question Washington hasn’t answered

Who governs 92 million Iranians?

President Donald Trump has said whoever governs Iran must receive Washington’s approval. But a veto is not a vision.

Approving or rejecting candidates from Washington requires a functioning political process, a legitimate transitional authority and a population willing to accept an American imprimatur on their leadership — none of which exists.

Washington has a preference; it does not have a plan. If the objective is eliminating the nuclear program, then why does Iran still hold an unverified stockpile of weapon-usable uranium eight months after the 2025 strikes? The strikes have not resolved the proliferation question. They have made it more dangerous and less tractable.

If the objective is regional stability, why has every round of strikes produced a wider regional war?

Washington has no answer to any of these questions – only a theory of destruction.

ref. Iraq war’s aftermath was a disaster for the US – the Iran war is headed in the same direction – https://theconversation.com/iraq-wars-aftermath-was-a-disaster-for-the-us-the-iran-war-is-headed-in-the-same-direction-277585

Jevon McSkimming asked to pay back taxpayer-funded hotel nights with Ms Z

Source: Radio New Zealand

Jevon McSkimming was sentenced in December to nine months of home detention. RNZ/Samuel Rillstone

Police Commissioner Richard Chambers asked disgraced former Deputy Commissioner Jevon McSkimming for a “swift reimbursement” of funds used to pay for up to 10 stays at hotels in Wellington during an affair.

Chambers wrote to McSkimming last week after the Independent Police Conduct Authority released a summary of its investigation into McSkimming’s decision to invite a woman he was having an affair with – Ms Z – to stay with him in hotel accommodation paid for by police, on numerous occasions, primarily in 2016.

In the letter, obtained by RNZ under the Official Information Act, Chambers referred to the IPCA’s report in relation to his “overnight status in Wellington hotels with Ms Z”.

“You have confirmed that 8-10 times you stayed with Ms Z in Wellington hotels at the expense of police, but ultimately the taxpayer. The IPCA made an adverse finding in this respect.

“It is appropriate for you to reimburse police for these 8-10 hotel stays, and you are asked to reimburse police as soon as possible. You have knowledge of the hotels in which you stayed and the approximate cost at the time.”

Chambers said he welcomed McSkimming’s response and “swift reimbursement”.

The IPCA said its investigation was “impaired by a lack of records of travel expenditure and credit card statements from the time, due to the nine to 10 years that has elapsed since the spending occurred”.

The IPCA had not been able to review McSkimming’s credit card expenditure, and relied on the evidence of the complainant, McSkimming, his former executive assistant and one of his supervisors at the time.

“In 2016 and 2017, Mr McSkimming’s workplace was at Police National Headquarters in Wellington. He lived about 60-70kms away.”

McSkimming and his executive assistant at the time told the IPCA that he was regularly required to attend functions or late meetings in Wellington or catch early morning flights.

“On those occasions, his executive assistant would book accommodation at a Wellington hotel, paid for by police. The rationale for these bookings was explained to us as being to avoid a long drive home after a work event, or where he was required to attend a social function to ensure he was not having a drink and then driving.”

McSkimming told the IPCA he thought Ms Z stayed with him eight to 10 times.

“This is corroborated by Ms Z. Mr McSkimming breached policy by not informing his senior manager approving the travel that she would be staying with him. If he had done so, we consider it highly likely that approval would have been declined.

“In any case, whether or not he informed his manager, he breached the Police Code of Conduct by staying in hotels at Police expense and inviting the woman with whom he was having a sexual relationship to join him. If he had paid for the hotels himself, that would have been a different matter. However, the fact that the hotels were paid for by police gives rise to the perception that he was using taxpayer money to further a clandestine affair, thus bringing police into disrepute.”

Police Commissioner Richard Chambers. RNZ / Samuel Rillstone

Chambers earlier said he was “very concerned” to learn of McSkimming’s use of hotels in Wellington and agreed with the findings of the IPCA.

“This showed a disregard for taxpayers’ money and Police expenditure policy.”

Chambers said the police policy for sensitive expenditure required spending to be reasonable and able to withstand parliamentary and public scrutiny.

Mitchell earlier said he welcomed the IPCA report and its findings, which showed the investigations conducted by police were appropriate and adequate.

“Any misuse of taxpayer money is, under all circumstances, unacceptable. I support the Commissioner in his efforts to recoup these expenses,” Mitchell said.

“It is my view that unless there are exceptional work-related circumstances, staff should not require hotel accommodation in the same centre as their normal place of work.”

McSkimming’s expenses

RNZ earlier requested a copy of all expenses made by McSkimming covering the time of his affair.

Police responded with a screenshot of an expenses claim from 2017 and credit card statements for McSkimming covering the 2018 calendar year.

“New Zealand banks retain credit card statements for seven years, after which records are no longer available. No additional expenses have been identified beyond those attached, and credit card records for 2016 and 2017 are no longer held as they fall outside the seven-year timeframe. Therefore, any additional credit card statements are unavailable, and police have no reason to believe these records are held by any other agency.”

McSkimming’s work credit card had a $2000 limit. The 2018 credit card statements reveal he spent some time in Canada and the United States early in the year.

On 6 April, McSkimming stayed at the Thorndon Hotel, about a five-minute walk from Police National Headquarters. The accommodation cost $121.

A significant number of expenses relate to purchases at Wellington International Airport.

In November 2018, there were some expenses at SkyCity Hotel in Auckland and a $229 payment for Audioblocks, as well as an $80 excess baggage payment in Wellington. There was also an $80 transaction at Queenstown Airport.

He also spent $112 at Millbrook Resort in Arrowtown.

In December, there was a $147 payment at Wellington International Airport, followed by a $98 payment later that month.

RNZ asked Richard Chambers for comment on the expenses detailed in the OIA.

“This happened a number of years ago and without detailed records of the reasons for this expenditure, I cannot say whether it was appropriate,” he said.

“However, these expenses would have been considered against the travel policy at the time and were approved by a supervisor.”

Chambers said it was appropriate for police policy to provide for reasonable expenses for executive travel.

“Those expenses can include the use of hotels, parking, petrol and transport such as taxis. Such expenses should only be for work-related purposes, reasonable, and able to withstand public scrutiny.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Rugby: Crusaders teammates trade punches as tensions spill over at training

Source: Radio New Zealand

Crusaders’ forward Kershawl Sykes-Martin is one of the players reported to have been involved in the dust-up in training. Joe Allison

Days after a significant loss to the Blues, tensions rose at Crusaders training on Tuesday with reports of punches thrown.

Stuff is reporting prop Kershawl Sykes-Martin and lock Will Tucker were involved in a dust-up at Rugby Park in Christchurch during a contact session.

Captain David Havili was reportedly the man to break up the altercation.

After training, coach Rob Penney did his best to downplay the tension, telling reporters he was not fazed by the clash between his players and even welcomed it.

“So there should be,” Penney said when asked if there was tension in the camp after the 29-13 defeat to the Blues.

“It was a really lovely sight to see, actually. It is a reflection of how much it means. The boys aren’t happy with the performances and the outcomes.

“Very proud young men are going to come up against each other, and create a bit of sandpaper from time to time.

“But it’s not a thing that is going to affect negatively. We are all over it, the boys are fine.”

Penney expected there could be more scuffles at training in the future.

“It’s not the first time and it won’t be the last.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

National Party politicians rule out leadership bid

Source: Radio New Zealand

Education Minister Erica Stanford has often been tipped as a possible leadership contender. RNZ / Marika Khabazi

Education Minister Erica Stanford has been damning in her assessment of last week’s disastrous poll result for National, calling it a “bad week” for the party and for the caucus.

Speculation has been swirling about Prime Minister Christopher Luxon’s leadership after the Taxpayers’ Union Curia Poll result put National on 28.4 per cent – the party’s lowest result since Luxon became leader.

Asked on Tuesday whether she was happy with the result, Stanford – often tipped as a possible leadership contender – said: “No, of course not”.

“We’ve got to do a lot better as a party, all of us pull together, we’ve got to respect what voters are telling us,” she said.

In addition to the horror poll, Luxon also struggled to articulate the government’s position on the Iran conflict and flubbed his answers to questions on the same topic at his post-Cabinet press conference last week.

Asked whether it was a bad week for the prime minister, Stanford said the result reflected poorly on the party.

“I would say it’s a bad week for the National Party and our caucus, and we’ve got to do better all of us together, pull together and remember that our focus is on the New Zealand people, and in my case, raising student achievement,” Stanford said.

Any speculation she was vying for the top job was “reporters interviewing their own typewriters”, Stanford said, adding that she supported the prime minister “100 percent”.

On Tuesday afternoon, Stanford ruled out making any bids for the leadership.

“We have a leader, he’s doing a really good job, and I am part of a high-performing team just doing my job, reforming the education system.”

In a busy day in Parliament – when the Covid-19 inquiry report was released, National MP and Minister Shane Reti announced his retirement, and MP Mariameno Kapa-Kingi was reinstated to Te Pāti Māori by the High Court – National Party ministers and backbenchers were resolute in their support of the prime minister.

Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka said he had “no intentions” to run for the top job. RNZ / Mark Papalii

Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka said he backed Luxon and looked forward to the coming election campaign.

Asked whether he wanted to be the leader, he repeatedly said he had “no intentions” to run for the top job but also refused to rule out a future bid.

“It’s got nothing to do with me… I’m not here to answer questions about me running for the leadership, because, as you know, I support the prime minister.”

Tim Costley, MP for Ōtaki, said that asking Luxon to step down, should his polling worsen, had never crossed his mind.

“We’ve got a strong caucus. We’ve got 49. We’re looking great.”

Banks Peninsula MP Vanessa Weenink said she was not concerned about her seat, which was one of the most marginal at the last election.

“I’m not worried about my job. I’m not worried about my seat. I’m worried about the country if we have an alternative government.”

Takinini MP Rima Nakhle put her level of support for the prime minister at “123 percent”, while Upper Harbour MP Cameron Brewer said the caucus was unified.

“We respect the guy, we’re tight, we’re disciplined, and you can see that with all our answers in the last 72 hours. You know, we actually just want to get on with the job.”

The prime minister himself continued to brush off concerns about the poll, telling reporters on Tuesday that the party’s caucus meeting would feature normal business, adding the team was “really united, really focused, really driven”.

But Labour leader Chris Hipkins blasted National for getting itself into “one heck of a mess”.

“They promised they were going to fix the economy, they’ve shrunk it. They promised they were going to get Kiwis into work, more Kiwis are unemployed now. They promised they were going to fix government debt, government debt’s gone up. They promised they were going to fix the cost of living, the cost of living’s got harder for New Zealand households.

“Whether it’s Christopher Luxon or one of the other ministers who was involved in all of those decisions leading the National Party, the problem is they haven’t done what they said they were going to do.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Move-on orders ‘not welcome here’, Wellington leaders say

Source: Radio New Zealand

The move-on powers announced in February will mean police can move on rough sleepers or people displaying disorderly behaviour as young as 14-years-old. RNZ / Richard Tindiller

The Wellington region’s mayors, as well as iwi, church and social support agency leaders, say the government’s proposed move-on orders are not welcome in the region.

An open letter decrying the introduction of powers to enable police to relocate people from certain areas – under threat of fines or imprisonment – has been sent to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon.

But Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said the letter was “overly simplistic” and its signatories were “ignoring the facts”.

The letter – signed by 21 Wellington leaders – described the initiative as a “superficial and unhelpful” approach.

“Whilst we accept and understand that anti-social behaviour on the part of some must be able to be responded to, we don’t consider that moving a person to some other unspecified place fixes the problem, nor does anything to address the issues that individual is dealing with, and in fact, potentially causes significant harm,” the signatories wrote.

Breaching a move-on order – which would require someone to leave an area for up to 24 hours – risked a fine of up to $2000 or a three month jail term.

Community leaders ‘united’ in opposition – Mayor Andrew Little

Wellington City Mayor, Andrew Little, said it was important to show the government that leadership in the region was united in opposition to the legislation.

“What we’re all trying to do is just emphasise to the government that – if they’re serious about dealing with the issue – we actually need to be focussed on what the underlying solutions are. Not cosmetic measures that shift the problem to somewhere else,” Little said.

Little said he understood community and business concerns over rough sleeping and antisocial behaviour – but the initiative failed to offer any real solution to the problem.

“[The signatories] are all organisations that [have] people in the front-line dealing with the homelessness and rough sleeper issue and they don’t take their roles and responsibilities lightly. We know it causes concern to a lot of people – including people whose lives and business are disrupted by it. But the move on order – as a response to it – simply is not a solution,” Little said.

Legislation sends the wrong message to vulnerable people

Porirua mayor Anita Baker said the “vast majority” of people who found themselves on the streets we’re struggling with complex issues including mental health challenges, drug dependancy and a lack of appropriate services and housing options.

Baker said the legislation risked sending the wrong message to already disadvantaged people.

“It’s sending an indication to these people that we don’t really care. A $2000 fine, how are they even going to pay that? They can’t afford to be in a house so I think it is unhelpful.

We need more mental health services, we need more houses, how about providing those?” Baker said.

She said the legislation offered nothing to organisations already working to improve the circumstances of people living rough.

“Across the Wellington region there is already a strong collaborative approach between councils, police, health providers, housing organisations, iwi and NGOs.

“The focus is on outreach, connecting people to services, and creating pathways into stable housing. That work recognises that homelessness and related behaviour are usually the visible end of much deeper issues. Our priority will continue to be solutions that address those causes rather than measures that simply push the problem somewhere else,” Baker said.

Letter ‘overly simplistic’ – Paul Goldsmith

Goldsmith responded to requests for comment sent to Luxon.

He said the letter was “overly simplistic” and it’s signatories were “actively choosing to ignore the facts”.

“Only people who refuse those orders, will face prosecution. A move-on order, is not a criminal charge.

“This is about reclaiming our streets and our city centres for the enjoyment of everybody who visits, works and lives there” Goldsmith said.

Goldsmith said police had “the expertise to connect people with the support services they may require”.

“New Zealanders are fair-minded people, and our culture is one where we seek to help those who are in need, but that doesn’t mean we should accept our city centres, particularly our showcase tourist spots, becoming places of intimidation, and dysfunction,” Goldsmith said.

A protest against the move-on orders by people living and working in Auckland’s central city. Supplied

Police ‘overworked as it is’

Police Association head Steve Watt said police on the beat were “overworked as it is” did not have the resources to deal with the issues that led to people sleeping on the streets.

“The vast majority of people that are out on the street suffer from mental health issues, financial issues, anxiety issues. They’re all issues that really need to have specialist capability wrapped around them as opposed to police picking them up off the street and moving them along,” Watt said.

Watt said some members did welcome the additional powers but he felt the tools to deal with criminal behaviour on the streets were already available to police.

“There is legislation in place in order to deal with people that are on our streets, acting disorderly, being threatening towards members of the public or being offensive.

“We have powers under the Summary Offences Act in which we can deal with this. So what we’re talking about here is non-criminal activity and basically having an order to ship that problem down the street,” Watt said.

Legislation ‘another layer of mistreatment’

CEO of Te Rūnanga o Toa Rangatira, Helmut Modlik said the legislation would add “another layer of mistreatment” into already difficult lives.

“Moving somebody from one spot to an undisclosed second spot without any substantive response to the reason why they were there in the first place is – by my definition – ‘superficial’.

“We don’t want want anything that just adds another layer of mistreatment, or ignoring or unhelpfulness into the lives of these people whose lives are full of all of that,” Modlik said.

He said the legislation was far removed from what he understood to be the values of New Zealanders.

“Nobody likes to see extreme examples of homeless people making a nuisance of themselves. But if people take just a few minutes just to actually understand what’s going on for those poor souls – why they’re there and what’s going on – then a very different response is what follows.

“That should guide us. That should guide our public policy, that should guide our investable activity in this domain. Not a nod to a narrow spectrum of interests and a superficial response. Which is what it is.

“There’s nothing about it that aligns with my understanding of what kind of people we are here in Aotearoa,” Modlik said.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

To help save NZ’s native species, we must move past the extinction blame game

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Nic Rawlence, Associate Professor in Ancient DNA, University of Otago

Each time another study about human-driven species extinction hits the news in Aotearoa New Zealand, a familiar pattern unfolds in online comment sections.

As researchers in this field, we have seen how quickly new findings about biodiversity loss are overshadowed by a debate over who is responsible.

We have repeatedly encountered blunt statements such as “why should Māori have a say?” linked to arguments that Māori caused species declines.

Given the long dominance of European colonial perspectives in natural history and archaeology, it is perhaps unsurprising that such claims provoke strong responses.

Some Māori counter with statements such as “we didn’t cause moa extinction, we were the first conservationists”.

We have seen arguments that treasured species such as kuri (Polynesian dogs) would not have been allowed to go feral, and that the extinction of the Waitaha penguin was due to competition for nesting sites with hoiho yellow-eyed penguin, despite evidence to the contrary.

Such responses reflect frustration with research – and at times media coverage – framed in ways that appear to assign blame without sufficient context.

One news article on the translocation of takahē onto Ngāi Tahu land, for example, linked the species’ “decline” to land confiscations, despite evidence of a more complex history.

This isn’t a phenomenon unique to New Zealand. The causes of ecosystem modificationn on Rapanui (Easter Island) and megafauna extinction in Australia have been hotly debated. In Australia, responsibility has been variously attributed to human activity, climate change, or some combination of the two.

Ultimately, this blame game does little to advance understanding.

In Aotearoa, moving beyond it is essential if mātauranga (Māori knowledge systems) is to inform evidence-based kaitiakitanga (guardianship and stewardship) and the conservation of taonga (treasured) species.

Placing extinction in context

Throughout history, human expansion has often been followed by waves of extinction.

This is especially apparent in the Pacific, where island species – often slow-breeding and long-lived – have been especially vulnerable. Hunting for food, habitat clearance and the introduction of predators such as rats and dogs tipped ecosystems out of balance.

Eventually, a new balance was reached with humans as part of the ecosystem and the development of or modification of existing tikanga (customs).

Polynesians brought to Aotearoa kiore (Pacific rat), kuri and a suite of plants such as taro and kumara. With few available protein sources – there were no chickens or pigs – these earliest settlers relied heavily on hunting, particularly in southern Aotearoa where Polynesian horticulture was not viable.

Many species could not withstand even low levels of hunting, especially when combined with predation from introduced animals. People needed to eat, plain and simple.

Modelling suggests that for moa hunting to have been sustainable, more than half of the South Island would have needed to remain a “no-take” zone – and there is little reason to think the moa’s fate would have differed had Europeans arrived first.

Why language and inclusion matter

Effective science communication places findings in context and avoids language that overreaches the evidence or assigns unsupported blame.

A case in point was a recent study that described soot from human-induced forest fires in ice core samples retrieved in Antarctica and linked it to “Māori arrival in New Zealand”.

Some Māori saw the framing as suggesting responsibility for pollution in a region often perceived as pristine. There was considerable push back by New Zealand scientists, including Māori palaeoecologist Rewi Newnham, who showed the soot could have come from fires in Australia or South America around the same time.

It highlighted the problem of talking “about Māori without Māori” – and the importance of including Indigenous perspectives to ensure balanced interpretation of results.

We have seen similar tensions arise in discussions about rats. Pest eradication initiatives often treat all three rat species in Aotearoa as interchangeable, overlooking the distinct history of kiore.

While kiore undoubtedly contributed to ecological change, they were also a valued food source, seasonal indicator and taonga carried across the Pacific with intention and care.

Grouping kiore with Norway and ship rats oversimplifies that history and risks reinforcing the same binary thinking that underpins the extinction blame debate.

When nuance is stripped from species histories, our understanding of Māori relationships with animals are flattened. And opportunities are lost to learn from complex traditions of coexistence and management that could inform conservation today.

Moving forward with mātauranga

Society would do well to heed the whakataukī (traditional proverb) kia whakatōmuri te haere whakamua – to “walk backwards into the future with our eyes fixed on the past”.

Lessons from both Māori and Pākehā histories can help inform evidence-based kaitiakitanga, conservation management and sustainable mahinga kai (customary food gathering).

The knowledge gained from palaeontological and archaeological research should be viewed as an opportunity to give back knowledge to Māori lost due to colonialism, such as how Polynesians adapted to Aotearoa’s dynamic environment and evolved into Māori.

Within many Māori narratives of the natural world lie detailed ecological insights, shaped by generations of close relationship and observation.

These stories reflect deep understandings of population dynamics, seasonality and balance – knowledge grounded in lived experience and careful attention to place.

Reengaging with these ways of knowing alongside contemporary science offers more than historical understanding. It opens pathways toward more adaptive, relational and enduring forms of conservation in a rapidly changing world, such as is being done in the East Otago Taiapuri and between Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research and the Tūhoe Tuawhenua Trust.

Throwing blame about human impacts in the past is unproductive.

It is knowledge such as mātauranga, developed over centuries in Aotearoa and over millennia in other Indigenous cultures, alongside established conservation tools, that is needed to tackle Aotearoa’s ongoing biodiversity crisis.

ref. To help save NZ’s native species, we must move past the extinction blame game – https://theconversation.com/to-help-save-nzs-native-species-we-must-move-past-the-extinction-blame-game-276954

Gamblers can now bet on the outcome of wars – and that’s a problem

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Karoline Thomsen, Ph.D. Candidate, UNSW Sydney

The growing threat of conflict in the Middle East last week prompted a flood of activity in a little-known area of betting: prediction markets in which users can bet on a particular military action.

One user of the Polymarket betting platform won US$4,500 (A$6,350) by predicting the exact date of the United States striking Iran.

In total, Polymarket users bet more than US$4 million (A$5.65 million) on the US-Iran strikes occurring on February 28.

We are academics who have researched international criminal and humanitarian law and emerging trends in geopolitics on social media platforms.

So, what is Polymarket, how do these platforms work, and what are the potential risks?

What is Polymarket?

Polymarket is a cryptocurrency-based prediction market that offers an extremely wide range of foreign policy events for users to bet on.

Its main competitor, Kalshi, offers sports and policy bets, but not military bets.

The bets themselves are not gambling in a traditional sense, where the house sets the odds. Instead, it’s a contract where the price fluctuates much like shares traded on a stock exchange.

Users can suggest ideas for bets, but the bets are created by Polymarket.

The day-by-day US-Iran strike bet was accompanied by a series of other bets on the conflict, including:

  • the possibility of Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz
  • when US troops would enter Iran
  • what targets Iran might hit.

Bets related to the current war in Iran totalled US$529 million (A$726 million).

Users can also gamble on the Russia-Ukraine war, using real-time war maps synchronised to the Polymarket app to inform their bets – the same maps Ukrainians check for survival.

All payments are made in cryptocurrency.

Polymarket does not charge trading fees, except on its 15-minute crypto markets. These are comparable to day-trading stocks – users have to trade them swiftly for financial gain.

Instead, it has been reported the business model relies on the sale of the data generated on the platform.

While Polymarket hasn’t revealed whether it sells the data it collects, in other financial contexts, data is a valuable commodity. It is regularly sold to policymakers, advertisers and researchers.

The Conversation contacted Polymarket for comment but did not receive a reply before this article’s deadline.

Bans and grey areas

Polymarket was launched in the US in 2020 but it was banned for American users from 2022–25. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission found it to be non-compliant with gambling legislation.

More than 30 countries reached similar findings and banned the platform, with some such as Australia geoblocking the site.

Polymarket argued it is not a gambling company because the odds are set not by the house, but by user-determined probability contracts.

This argument was favourably received by the 2025 Trump administration, which overturned the ban.

Donald Trump Jr is a major investor in Polymarket, a strategic advisor to Kalshi, and the director of an upcoming expansion to the Truth Social universe: Truth Predict (another prediction market).

The bets on offer on these platforms raise a host of legal, political and moral questions.

Benefiting from misery

Users are betting millions of dollars on what they believe to be the probability of the US striking Iran or the likelihood of a particular city of Ukrainian civilians being captured by Russian forces.

These gamblers stand to benefit financially from the pain of innocent civilians.

Reducing complex military decisions to a yes/no gamble dehumanises the civilians trapped in the conflict and potentially paves the way for malicious activity.

What if an official in power was influenced by the bets they or their constituents had placed when deciding precisely when to bomb another country?

What if it was revealed after a military strike that a decision-maker personally profited from the choice to press the button on a specific date, or to use a specific weapon for the strike?

Concerns about inside information

This is not as far-fetched as it sounds. Several Israeli soldiers are currently under arrest and are facing an internal investigation for allegedly using classified information to inform their bets on Polymarket about strikes Israel would or would not pursue.

The case of a man winning US$400,000 (A$570,000) just hours after placing a correct bet on when the US would capture Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has led to speculation of misuse of insider information.

Polymarket is designed to minimise transparency regarding who places what bets and based on what information.

Polymarket claims to offer anonymity to users but corruption allegations against a few mysteriously lucky bettors indicates that in some cases, users may be identified.

The value of data

The value of the data generated depends on who is buying it and what value they place on it.

Data from bets on US military action in Iran might attract a higher price from states in the region than data on the expected likelihood of a hurricane in South Carolina.

Polymarket might, therefore, issue more bets on extreme events that attract attention.

This, combined with the anonymous design, makes it a potentially dangerous tool of information warfare: very little prevents hostile actors from placing bets and polluting the public discourse.

A foreign state could place bets on the odds of a war in their interest, for example. This can change the public discourse and additionally impact the values of the bets, with financial implications for the other gamblers.

Further, by monitoring what bets are available, a hostile state can assess what issues to sew disinformation into.

How Polymarket manages its data is unknown. It is unclear what data specifically Polymarket stores, to whom it is sold and in which configurations, and what the data is used for by the purchasers.

But selling data on the public’s expectations of war requires much more scrutiny.

ref. Gamblers can now bet on the outcome of wars – and that’s a problem – https://theconversation.com/gamblers-can-now-bet-on-the-outcome-of-wars-and-thats-a-problem-277374

West Papua’s humanitarian crisis stalls Prabowo’s ‘global peacemaker’ credibility bid

ANALYSIS: By Ali Mirin

Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto has increasingly presented himself on the international stage as a mediator and promoter of peace.

Yet this global diplomatic posture raises a critical question: how credible is Indonesia’s claim to peace leadership while a prolonged humanitarian crisis continues in West Papua?

In late February 2026, Prabowo offered Indonesia’s services to mediate rising tensions involving the United States, Israel and Iran, even stating he was prepared to travel to Tehran if both parties agreed to dialogue.

The message was reinforced when former Indonesian vice-president Jusuf Kalla met Iran’s ambassador, Mohammad Boroujerdi, on 3 March 2026 to reiterate Indonesia’s readiness to facilitate diplomatic engagement.

In response, Iran publicly welcomed the gesture but tempered expectations.

Iranian officials insisted that any meaningful mediation must include condemnation of US and Israeli military actions, warning that diplomatic initiatives without political clarity may have limited effectiveness.

The exchange highlighted both Indonesia’s aspiration to play a larger diplomatic role and the complexities of international conflict mediation.

Peacebroker limitations
However, Indonesia’s attempt to position itself as a global peace broker has already faced significant limitations. In 2023, Prabowo proposed a peace plan for the war between Russia and Ukraine.

The proposal, which included controversial suggestions such as a demilitarised zone and a referendum in disputed territories, was quickly rejected by Ukrainian officials. The response exposed the limited influence of Indonesia’s mediation efforts in conflicts far beyond Southeast Asia.

While presenting himself internationally as a peacemaker, critics argue that Prabowo has largely paid lip service to human rights at home, particularly regarding the unresolved crisis in West Papua.


Indonesian protesters denounce US link over Iran war         Video: Al Jazeera

While Indonesia promotes its diplomatic role in international conflicts, violence and instability continue to affect civilians in West Papua.

On 11 February 2026, only weeks before Prabowo’s international mediation initiative gained attention, a small civilian aircraft operated by Smart Air came under gunfire shortly after landing at Korowai Batu airstrip in Boven Digoel, West Papua.

A spokesperson linked to the military wing of Free Papua Movement (TPNPB- OPM) later claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the aircraft had allegedly been used to transport Indonesian security forces.

The roots of the crisis stretch back to the early 1960s, when Indonesia invaded and took control of the territory following the withdrawal of Dutch colonial administration.

Act of Free Choice controversy
The subsequent 1969 referendum, known as the Act of Free Choice, remains one of the most controversial political processes in modern Southeast Asian and South Pacific history.

Rather than a universal vote, approximately 1025 selected representatives voted under significant political and military pressure.

Many Papuans and international observers argue that the process failed to meet internationally recognized standards for self-determination. As a result, the legitimacy of the referendum continues to be contested, and its legacy remains a central grievance fueling decades of political resistance and armed conflict.

For many analysts and human rights advocates, the Papua conflict cannot simply be framed as a domestic security problem. Instead, it represents a protracted humanitarian and political crisis that has yet to find a comprehensive and inclusive resolution.

In this sense, the issue has become what some observers describe as a long-standing wound within the Indonesian state.

Such incidents highlight the tragic reality faced by ordinary Papuans, who often find themselves caught between military operations and Papuan resistance attacks.

Civilians bear the brunt of a conflict that has persisted for decades without meaningful political dialogue capable of addressing its underlying causes.

Rising internal displacement in West Papua
According to reports by human rights organisations and humanitarian groups, displacement in West Papua has increased significantly in recent years.

The number of internally displaced persons (IDPs) has risen dramatically, from roughly 55,000 at the end of 2023 to more than 103,000 by October 2025. Many displaced communities face severe shortages of food, healthcare, education, and basic security.

These figures reflect a broader systemic failure to protect civilians and provide sustainable solutions for affected communities. Despite decades of development initiatives and official rhetoric emphasising stability and prosperity in Papua, the lived reality for many residents remains defined by insecurity and displacement.

Prabowo’s own military history also continues to shape international perceptions of Indonesia’s human rights record. During the Indonesian occupation of East Timor between 1975 and 1999, Prabowo served as an officer in Indonesia’s elite special forces, Kopassus.

Human rights organisations have linked him to operations accused of abuses against civilians during that period.

Following the 1999 referendum that ultimately led to East Timor’s independence, the United Nations supported investigations into violence carried out by Indonesian-backed militias and security forces.

Although Prabowo was never tried or convicted by an international court, activists and some Timorese leaders have long argued that senior Indonesian officers should have faced deeper scrutiny.

Shaping of credibility
In international diplomacy, credibility is often shaped not only by external initiatives but also by a state’s domestic human rights record. When internal conflicts remain unresolved, claims to global moral leadership can face heightened scrutiny.

Prabowo was also involved in military operations in Papua during the 1990s. One of the most widely discussed incidents was the 1996 Mapenduma hostage crisis in the highlands of what is now Nduga Regency.

Human rights organisations have documented allegations of abuses committed by Indonesian security forces during that period.

Additional controversies have surrounded claims that aircraft bearing the emblem of the International Committee of the Red Cross were misused during operations. Such allegations, whether proven or not, continue to raise questions about adherence to international humanitarian law and contribute to lingering distrust among Papuan communities.

Taken together, these historical and contemporary dynamics create a sharp contrast between Indonesia’s global diplomatic ambitions and the unresolved realities within its own borders.

In international diplomacy, credibility is closely tied to domestic consistency.
It is difficult to advocate peace abroad while unresolved grievances and allegations of human rights violations persist at home.

For Indonesia, genuine leadership in global peacemaking would require more than diplomatic offers on the world stage. It would involve confronting the deeper structural issues underlying the conflict in West Papua.

Ensuring accountability
This would include ensuring accountability for past abuses, protecting civil liberties, and opening inclusive political dialogue that allows Papuans to meaningfully participate in shaping their own future.

Without such reforms, Indonesia’s peace diplomacy risks being perceived less as principled international engagement and more as a form of strategic public relations. The gap between Jakarta’s diplomatic rhetoric and the lived experiences of Papuan civilians remains stark.

Ultimately, Indonesia’s credibility as a global peacemaker will depend not only on its willingness to mediate conflicts abroad but also on its ability to address the long-standing humanitarian and political crisis within West Papua.

Until that gap is bridged, Indonesia’s aspirations for global diplomatic leadership will continue to face serious questions about legitimacy and moral authority.

The continued instability in West Papua also has broader regional implications for the Pacific, where several governments and civil society groups have increasingly raised concerns about the humanitarian situation faced by indigenous West Papuans.

Ali Mirin is a West Papuan from the Kimyal tribe in the highlands bordering the Star Mountains region of Papua New Guinea. He holds a Master of Arts in international relations from Flinders University in Adelaide, South Australia.

Article by AsiaPacificReport.nz

ER Report: A Roundup of Significant Articles on EveningReport.nz for March 10, 2026

ER Report: Here is a summary of significant articles published on EveningReport.nz on March 10, 2026.

Here’s why you might want to clean your headphones
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rina Wong (Fu), Research Fellow, Health Sciences, Curtin University Whether it’s enjoying a podcast, listening to music or chatting on the phone, many of us spend hours a day using our headphones. One 2017 study of 4,185 Australians showed they used headphones on average 47–88 hours a

As tonnes of illegal tobacco sneak in past our borders, we risk missing a threat that could cost us billions
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Simon McKirdy, Professor of Biosecurity and Deputy Vice Chancellor of Global Engagement, Murdoch University Australia regularly makes global headlines for its strict biosecurity rules for international travellers. Failing to declare food, animal products and plant material – from an apple, to forgotten McMuffins or plant cuttings –

It’s tempting to offload your thinking to AI. Cognitive science shows why that’s a bad idea
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Misia Temler, Research Affiliate, Psychology, University of Sydney With so many artificial intelligence (AI) products on offer now, it’s increasingly tempting to offload difficult thinking tasks to chatbots, agents and other tools. As we chart this new technological terrain, more and more we’re exposed to vast amounts

Australia has granted some Iranian soccer players asylum – but 2 questions remain
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Catherine Ordway, Visiting Scholar, UNSW Sydney Last week, the Iranian soccer team refused to sing the national anthem before their Asian Women’s Cup opener on the Gold Coast. It was a silent protest in solidarity with thousands killed in deadly crackdowns in Iran. But some of these

Second COVID inquiry: why being politically prepared for the next pandemic is crucial
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Grant Duncan, Research Associate, Public Policy Institute, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau COVID-19 changed the course of New Zealand’s political history. Labour’s 50% of the vote in 2020 came from a huge electoral swing as a reward for the main coalition party’s effective evidence-based policies, and

5 members of Iranian women’s soccer team defect, Australia deploys RAAF plane and missiles to Gulf
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra The Albanese government has given humanitarian visas to five members of the Iranian women’s soccer team, including its captain, to enable them to remain in Australia, and is offering protection to any more of the women who want to defect.

’10 classrooms full of children’ – US-Israeli war kills hundreds of Iranian, Lebanese kids
Zahra Sultana has mocked US and Israeli pretensions, saying in a BBC interview on Sunday — International Women’s Day — that the girls in the Minab school were slaughtered “apparently to liberate women”. SPECIAL REPORT: By Brett Wilkins of Common Dreams US and Israeli airstrikes have killed nearly 300 Iranian and Lebanese children over the

COVID inquiry phase two: 4 main lessons to improve NZ’s future pandemic resilience
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Murdoch, Distinguished Professor, University of Otago A second Royal Commission of Inquiry into New Zealand’s experience and handling of the COVID pandemic released its substantial report today, running to several volumes and hundreds of pages. The coalition government commissioned the inquiry to specifically examine key decisions

I’ve studied MAGA rhetoric for a decade, and this is what I see in Hegseth’s boasts, action-movie one-liners and gloating over dominance
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Casey Ryan Kelly, Professor of Communication Studies, University of Nebraska-Lincoln When Secretary of Defense James Mattis addressed the intensification of U.S. combat operations against the Islamic State group in 2017, he assured the American public of his commitment to “get the strategy right” while maintaining “the rules

AUKUS is binding Australia to a dangerous, unpredictable leader. We need a Plan B now
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Hugh White, Emeritus Professor of Strategic Studies at the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, Australian National University In a dangerous and uncertain world, what should US allies do? Draw closer to America, or pull away? When the United States under President Donald Trump is itself among the

5 top tips for the perfect compost – according to science
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Gregory Moore, Senior Research Associate, School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, The University of Melbourne As a young boy, I had to contend with my grandfather’s compost heap. It was a veritable Vesuvius of foul-smelling, putrescible plant waste, a metre high and hidden behind a privet

As global trade rules falter, how can Australia protect itself from economic coercion?
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Draper, Professor, and Executive Director: Institute for International Trade, and Director of the Jean Monnet Centre of Trade and Environment, Adelaide University The United States was once a champion of fair trade rules. Now, it has transformed into a rampaging Viking seeking extortionate tributes. This shift

The Oscars aren’t a meritocracy – there’s a complex formula for winning
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By William Simon, Casual Lecturer (Education and English Departments), University of Tasmania Every January, Hollywood is overtaken by a massive Oscar prediction game, with studios, critics and commentators all playing a role in shaping the debate. But choosing a winner is more complicated than acknowledging a film’s artistic

How ‘looksmaxxing’ self-improvement apps are marketing misogyny to young men
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Marten Risius, Adjunct Senior Fellow, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland A theory about male “sexual market value” that began in online manosphere forums is now appearing in the TikTok feeds of Australian teenagers — repackaged as AI-powered “looksmaxxing” apps. The idea is closely tied to

Your child has pathological demand avoidance? Here’s what it means – and 9 tips for what to do
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Nicole Rinehart, Nicole Rinehart, Professor, Clinical Psychology, Director of the Neurodevelopment Program, School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University For some children, everyday demands such “brush your teeth” or “time to get off of your computer game”, can trigger intense anxiety

US military opens environmental review for expanded Marianas training footprint
By Mark Rabago, RNZ Pacific Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas correspondent The United States military has begun the formal environmental review process for the continuation of large-scale training and testing activities in waters around the Northern Mariana Islands and on Farallon de Medinilla. The Department of the Navy, including the US Navy and Marine Corps,

ER Report: A Roundup of Significant Articles on EveningReport.nz for March 9, 2026
ER Report: Here is a summary of significant articles published on EveningReport.nz on March 9, 2026.

Here’s why you might want to clean your headphones

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rina Wong (Fu), Research Fellow, Health Sciences, Curtin University

Whether it’s enjoying a podcast, listening to music or chatting on the phone, many of us spend hours a day using our headphones. One 2017 study of 4,185 Australians showed they used headphones on average 47–88 hours a month.

Health advice about headphones tends to focus on how loud sounds might affect our hearing. For example, to avoid hearing loss, the World Health Organization advises people to keep the volume at below 60% their device’s maximum and to use devices that monitor sound exposure and limit volume.

But apart from sound, what else is going in our ears? Using headphones – particularly in-ear versions such as earbuds – blocks the ear canal and puts the skin in contact with any dirt or bacteria they may be carrying.

Here’s what you need to know about keeping your ears clean and safe.

First, let’s take a look at your ear

Over-ear headphones cover the entire external ear – the elastic cartilage covered by skin that’s shaped to trap soundwaves. In-ear headphones (as well as hearing aids) are shaped to fit and cover the entrance to the external ear canal, which is called the concha.

Sound vibrations travel through the ear canal – which is S-shaped and a few centimetres long – to reach your ear drum.

Deeper parts of the ear canal produce earwax and oils. These help keep your skin healthy, hydrated and less vulnerable to infection.

Tiny hairs in the ear canal also help regulate temperature and keep foreign debris out. These hairs and earwax help trap and move small particles, shed skin and bacteria out of the ear canal.

Earwax is the ear’s self-cleaning method and we only tend to notice it when there’s too much.

Excessive buildup can block your hearing or even clog the mesh of your earpods. But don’t try to dig earwax out of your ears yourself. If you’re concerned, speak to a pharmacist or GP for advice.

Diagram showing earwax in the ear canal.
We generally only notice earwax when there’s too much. Alexander_P/Shutterstock

How headphones can affect the ear’s bacteria

Healthy ear canals host a range of non-harmful microbes – mainly bacteria, but fungi and viruses too. They compete for space and nutrients, and this diversity makes it trickier for any potential pathogens (disease-causing microorganisms) to take hold.

But wearing headphones (and other in-ear devices such as hearing aids or ear plugs) may upset the balance between “good” and “bad” bacteria.

One 2024 study compared bacteria in the external ear canals of 50 people who used hearing aids and 80 who didn’t. The researchers found hearing-aid users – whose external ear canals are blocked for extended periods – had fewer types of bacteria than those who didn’t.

Another 2025 study looked at how using headphones (including over-ear, in-ear and on-ear) affected fungi and bacteria in the ear canal. It found using headphones was linked to a greater risk of ear infections, especially if people shared them.

This may because wearing headphones – especially in-ear devices – makes the external ear canal hotter and more humid. Trapped moisture is especially likely if you exercise and sweat while wearing headphones.

Higher humidity increases your risk of ear infection and discharge, including pus.

Wearing in-ear devices such as hearing aids or headphones for extended periods can also interfere with the ear’s natural “self-cleaning” function, aided by earwax.

So, what should I do?

Most of us need – or like – to wear headphones in our day-to-day routines. But for good ear health, it’s important to give your ears a break.

Allow your ear canals to “breathe” at different points throughout the day so they’re not constantly blocked and growing humid and hot.

You could also try bone conduction headphones. These don’t block the ear canal, because they transmit sound through your skull directly into the inner ear, without needing to block the ear canal. These can be expensive though. And while they allow our ears to breathe, high-intensity vibrations (high volume) can still damage hearing, so as with all headphones caution is required.

Other tips

Clean your devices regularly

Recommendations range from once a week to daily to after a physical workout.

For example, you can wipe them with a cloth or use a soft-bristled children’s toothbrush dampened with mildly soapy water. Blot dry with a paper towel and allow a few hours of drying before recharging or reuse.

But it’s best to follow your manufacturer’s guidelines. And don’t forget to clean the case and the body of your earbuds too.

Don’t use headphones when sick

If you have an ear infection, avoid using earphones as they may increase the temperature and humidity in your ear and slow recovery.

Watch for symptoms

If your ears become itchy, red or have discharge, stop using in-ear devices and seek medical advice.

ref. Here’s why you might want to clean your headphones – https://theconversation.com/heres-why-you-might-want-to-clean-your-headphones-255590

As tonnes of illegal tobacco sneak in past our borders, we risk missing a threat that could cost us billions

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Simon McKirdy, Professor of Biosecurity and Deputy Vice Chancellor of Global Engagement, Murdoch University

Australia regularly makes global headlines for its strict biosecurity rules for international travellers.

Failing to declare food, animal products and plant material – from an apple, to forgotten McMuffins or plant cuttings – can result in fines of up to A$6,600, potential prosecution and cancellations of visitor visas.

There are good reasons for those rules: Australia has managed to keep its environment and agriculture free of many invasive pests and diseases. Yet the volume of goods coming into Australia makes it hard to catch everything, especially biosecurity threats coming in on ships.

And that’s a problem – because if tonnes of illegal tobacco keep getting past our border security, undetected, we risk increased exposure to invasive pests that could cost our farmers billions.

Why tobacco is a biosecurity risk

The social and economic problems caused by Australia’s illegal tobacco trade have been widely reported, including ongoing firebombings, shootings and intimidation targeting tobacco retailers across several states.

But while the scale of the booming illicit trade is well known, its biosecurity risks have received little public attention. This is a significant omission.

Around 575 tonnes of illegal tobacco products – cigarettes, loose leaf tobacco and vapes – were produced in Australia in 2024-25, according to official estimates.

But far more – an estimated 3,312 to 5,397 tonnes in the same year – was imported. It arrives mainly on ships coming in via China, Hong Kong, Singapore and the United Arab Emirates.

About 2,244 tonnes of that was seized in 2024-25. So thousands of tonnes more have been getting in undetected.

Illicit tobacco is a dried plant product and a biosecurity risk in its own right. The Australian government also lists tobacco as a potential carrier of many pests that pose significant threats to our agriculture and environment.

Khapra beetle: a high-impact hitchhiker

US Customs found these 13 live larvae in a package of jujubes fruit on a flight landing at Dallas International Airport. US Customs and Border Protection, via Wikimedia Commons

One such pest is the khapra beetle, a known hitchhiker on ships.

This tiny insect, just 1.6–3mm long, infests grain and other dry organic material, rendering it unfit for human or animal consumption. It’s the number one biosecurity threat to Australia’s $26 billion grain industry.

An incursion of khapra beetle would result in loss of access to key overseas markets, estimated at more than $15 billion over 20 years. Prevention is critical.

Native to India, khapra beetles have spread around the world in a wide variety of products, from food (such as rice) and other products (such as a box of children’s nappy pants in Australia last year), to packaging and machinery.

The larvae are exceptionally resilient and can hibernate in sea containers for years.

Khapra beetle has been detected numerous times at our border, with a marked increase in 2020. Those extra detections came after the federal government introduced emergency measures to address the growing risk of khapra beetles arriving in sea containers.

Two images of a two-storey home, before and after being wrapped in white plastic for fumigation

This home in Western Australia had to be wrapped in plastic and fumigated in 2007, after a newly arrived couple from the UK discovered khapra beetles and larvae in their belongings. Rob Emery

One notable detection was in 2007, when a couple who had migrated from the United Kingdom found khapra beetles in belongings that had spent six weeks at sea.

The woman discovered beetles inside a mug and, worse, larvae in her wrapped wedding dress. It turned out many other belongings were infested. The entire two-storey house was shrink-wrapped in plastic and fumigated.

Importantly, it was a successful eradication, and the grain industry was protected.

How illegal tobacco raises the risks of invasive pests

Any trade that’s illegal is more likely to use sea containers that are not cleaned, fumigated or adequately documented.

Added to this, tobacco is often sourced from high-risk regions with fake declarations.

In addition to khapra beetles, other pests could be introduced from imported tobacco.

One example is insecticide-resistant tobacco beetles. These beetles are common in Australian grain storages as well as households. However, the introduction of resistant strains could make it more difficult to control in museums, galleries and libraries – where they can cause severe damage to preserved animal specimens or book-bindings – as well as in household pantries.

Citizen scientists have reported the presence of tobacco beetles more than 200 times using the free MyPestGuide Reporter photo app. This tool was developed by Dr Darryl Hardie and one of us (Rob Emery) to make it easier for the public to report pests they find in various household commodities, including in their tobacco.

Community vigilance, combined with strong border controls, remain essential for protecting Australia from the biosecurity consequences of illicit imports.

Why we need to boost detection at our ports

Public debate about curbing illegal tobacco sales has largely focused on state government enforcement efforts. However, the first, most effective line of defence is at the border.

The relatively low interception rate for a bulky and easily recognisable commodity such as tobacco raises broader questions about our ability to detect less visible threats – like tiny beetles – that may carry even greater biosecurity risks.

Investment in maintaining and strengthening Australia’s border biosecurity must remain a national priority. Detection of illicit tobacco arriving at our ports urgently needs to improve.

Failure to implement effective biosecurity controls across all Australian ports exposes our environment and our farmers to risks worth billions of dollars.


Thanks to Dr Darryl Hardie for his contribution to this article.

ref. As tonnes of illegal tobacco sneak in past our borders, we risk missing a threat that could cost us billions – https://theconversation.com/as-tonnes-of-illegal-tobacco-sneak-in-past-our-borders-we-risk-missing-a-threat-that-could-cost-us-billions-277614

It’s tempting to offload your thinking to AI. Cognitive science shows why that’s a bad idea

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Misia Temler, Research Affiliate, Psychology, University of Sydney

With so many artificial intelligence (AI) products on offer now, it’s increasingly tempting to offload difficult thinking tasks to chatbots, agents and other tools.

As we chart this new technological terrain, more and more we’re exposed to vast amounts of information and highly sophisticated software that offers to do the thinking for us. In just a few seconds, tools such as ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini can draft your emails, generate a caring birthday message for a friend, or even summarise the plot of that novel you haven’t gotten around to reading.

Such increased offloading has raised the fear that people will become overly reliant on AI. This could have unintended consequences, such as eroding our critical thinking skills and declining our overall cognitive ability.

This fear is not unfounded. Research from our lab suggests the online environment exploits our cognitive tendencies – individual differences in how we think, perceive, pay attention and remember. In turn, some people end up taking more mental shortcuts and only engaging with information superficially. Other studies have linked high AI use to increased laziness, anxiety, lower critical engagement and feelings of dependence.

Yet it may be how we use AI that’s the problem, rather than the fact we do it at all. Generally, relying on external sources is fine – we do this constantly. But it’s important to remain in control of what we choose to offload, and why.

How do we even know things?

We all constantly rely on each other’s knowledge to function as a society. Doctors provide medical information, engineers are in charge of construction, financial advisers give investment tips, and so on.

All this spread of expertise provides each of us with more knowledge than we can individually hold. In other words, we constantly balance offloading (letting someone else do the thinking) with scaffolding (relying on external knowledge sources to enrich our own thinking).

Scaffolding often happens when we learn. For example, a teacher doesn’t write an essay for their student – instead, they provide feedback so the student can connect, integrate, and grow their knowledge base.

Crucially, we also don’t offload all thinking tasks to one specific person. Instead, we carefully consider the person’s trust and expertise before accepting their advice, tools or support. We also check how the new information fits in with what we already know.

As our knowledge grows in a certain area, we rely less on outside support, just as a student relies on a teacher until they learn enough to stand on their own.

It’s not just our brains doing the work

Cognition (our thinking skills) is the central concept in all of this. Our minds engage in three fundamental tasks:

  • encoding information (taking it in so the brain can parse it)
  • storing information, and
  • retrieving information.

Cognition relies on how well these three mental tasks work together. When we’re overwhelmed with information, distributing tasks to outside sources lessens that mental effort.

Research shows when our attention is strained, our minds focus more on encoding information while sacrificing storage and retrieval, which are more taxing.

Intuitively, it’s easy to assume all our cognition just happens in the brain. But our cognitive processes are sometimes extended to things in the environment. These external sources can be people, physical objects and digital tools. A diary is an extension of your mind if you use it to retrieve memories you’ve written down.

However, flippantly offloading your knowledge acquisition and storage to external sources – such as asking ChatGPT any question that pops in your mind – can have an impact on your critical thinking skills. This is because acquired knowledge actively interacts with newly encoded information in our minds: we convert information we come across in a way that makes sense to us.

And the more knowledge we hold, the greater our capacity to encode and critically interpret new information. For example, knowledge of Hitler and Mussolini in the context of the second world war helps us to better understand the modern dangers of dictatorship.

Hard work can be rewarding

To restore balance, we need to perform the more difficult cognitive tasks ourselves, not just offload them whenever it’s convenient.

The faster and easier option isn’t always the best – just like choosing to walk to your friend’s place provides better exercise for your body and mind than driving there does.

Sometimes hard work can be rewarding. When faced with using AI tools, you can either choose to control them, or let them control you.

One way to balance your relationship with AI tools is to use reflective practices. Ask yourself: how do you feel after using AI? Do you feel proud and satisfied, or do you feel more anxious and more overwhelmed? Have you replaced or scaffolded your cognition today? What tasks can you do to expand your mental capabilities tomorrow?

For a successful relationship with AI, we need to exercise all our mental skills – otherwise we really do risk losing them.

This may not always be easy, but it remains in our control.

ref. It’s tempting to offload your thinking to AI. Cognitive science shows why that’s a bad idea – https://theconversation.com/its-tempting-to-offload-your-thinking-to-ai-cognitive-science-shows-why-thats-a-bad-idea-276766

Australia has granted some Iranian soccer players asylum – but 2 questions remain

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Catherine Ordway, Visiting Scholar, UNSW Sydney

Last week, the Iranian soccer team refused to sing the national anthem before their Asian Women’s Cup opener on the Gold Coast.

It was a silent protest in solidarity with thousands killed in deadly crackdowns in Iran.

But some of these athletes could be facing the death penalty should they return home, after being labelled “war traitors” on Iranian state television.

Late on Monday, news broke that five players have been granted asylum in Australia and are now safe with police.

So how did it get to this and what may happen next? And what about the rest of the team?

‘Wartime traitors’

Sport, and soccer in particular, carries enormous political weight in Iran.

Athletes are symbols of the nation’s endurance. Their victories are political capital while their silence is viewed as a threat.

It’s perhaps no surprise, then, the players’ refusal to sing the national anthem sparked fury with regime hardliners, days after US-Israel strikes on the country.

Radical conservative television presenter Mohammad Reza Shahbazi, who is considered a mouthpiece for the Iranian government, characterised the women’s team as “wartime traitors” for not singing the anthem, and called for reprisals.

The team subsequently sang and saluted the anthem at their next two matches, but the pressure on them did not abate.

If some members of the team return home, they may be charged for a crime that attracts the death penalty in wartime.

For those who stay in Australia, it’s likely their families’ safety will be threatened.

On Sunday, after Iran’s third and final match of the tournament, supporters protested around the team’s bus leaving the stadium, expressing their fear for the team’s safety.

Supporters surrounding the bus reported noticing at least one player making the hand gesture signalling for help (SOS) from the bus window.

Visas granted

As the situation escalated on Monday, US President Donald Trump implored Australia to give the athletes asylum.

He initially claimed the athletes were being forced to leave Australia, but later posted “he’s on it!” after discussing the issue with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

On Tuesday morning, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke confirmed five Iranian athletes have been granted humanitarian visas to stay in Australia after escaping the squad’s security detail.

Burke said the the Australian government was keeping the door open for other athletes to claim asylum:

Last night, I was able to tell five members of the Iranian women’s soccer team that they are welcome to stay in Australia, that they are safe here, and they should feel at home here. Not everyone on the team will make a decision to take up the opportunity that Australia would offer them. What matters here is that they have the best agency they can over those decisions. So we’re making sure that the opportunity to seek assistance is there.

Two more questions

The dramatic events have sparked two serious questions.

First, what could the football organisations involved – the International Federation of Association Football (FIFA), the Asian Football Confederation (AFC), and Football Australia – have done to be more prepared?

All have policies that promote and protect human rights. A human rights assessment is also done as part of the host nation bid process.

FIFA has a human rights framework to which bidding host nations must adhere, focused on protecting players and their entourage from discrimination and other human rights abuses.

This framework is also reflected in the AFC statutes for its members, including Football Australia.

Football Australia, as Asian Cup host, states in its constitution that it:

strive(s) to promote the protection of human rights in accordance with FIFA’s human rights policies and commitments.

Beau Busch, Asia/Oceania president of world soccer’s professional players’ association, FIFPRO, said the refusal to sing the anthem had been anticipated.

Busch said he had written to FIFA, the AFC and the tournament organisers on February 11 to express concern for the players’ welfare and offering to work proactively to protect their human rights, but did not receive a reply.

This lack of preparedness meant the Iranian athletes were forced into a last-minute, life-or-death decision under immense pressure.

A second question revolves around the Iranian team’s security detail, which includes people linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

While in Australia, the players have been extremely restricted both inside their hotel and at press conferences by their minders – unable to speak with friends or move freely.

Australia officially listed the IRGC as a state sponsor of terrorism in November 2025.

The IRGC has a strong influence over the Iranian Football Federation, including through its president, Mehdi Taj, who is one of five vice-presidents of the AFC.

But how were these security personnel allowed into the country?

Julian Leeser, Shadow Minister for Education, said anyone associated with the IRGC should be detained.

Lessons for the future

So what lessons can be learned to reduce the chances of this gut-wrenching situation happening again?

A similar situation may emerge in June at the men’s FIFA Men’s World Cup in the United States, Canada and Mexico, for which Iran has qualified.

The president of Iran’s soccer federation has stated he “does not know” if the team will compete, as the US government has not confirmed who from the security team will receive visas to enter the country. The current visa rules in the US places a full restriction on Iranian nationals entry with exceptions subject to case-by-case waivers.

If they do play, FIFA and the World Cup’s local organising committees must be prepared for similar scenes.

Of course, sports organisations aren’t the United Nations. But if these powerful organisations are more proactive and prepared – with clear safeguards and secure access to support – it should help minimise the drama that has affected, not just the athletes and their coach, but their friends and families abroad.

ref. Australia has granted some Iranian soccer players asylum – but 2 questions remain – https://theconversation.com/australia-has-granted-some-iranian-soccer-players-asylum-but-2-questions-remain-277834

Second COVID inquiry: why being politically prepared for the next pandemic is crucial

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Grant Duncan, Research Associate, Public Policy Institute, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau

COVID-19 changed the course of New Zealand’s political history.

Labour’s 50% of the vote in 2020 came from a huge electoral swing as a reward for the main coalition party’s effective evidence-based policies, and then prime minister Jacinda Ardern’s leadership.

It gave the party the first (and possibly last) single-party majority under the MMP proportional system.

But as the second report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into COVID-19 says, “New Zealand’s exit from the elimination strategy was difficult, rather than prepared and staged.”

In late 2021, the report adds, “social licence and willingness to comply with restrictions diminished”.

Central decision-makers became risk-averse and didn’t keep up with shifts in public sentiment from late 2021. This contributed to a decline in public confidence and to Labour’s election defeat in 2023.

NZ First’s return to parliament with 6% of the vote in 2023 was aided by voters who had resisted vaccination. In its coalition agreement with National, NZ First negotiated to widen the COVID inquiry to focus on vaccine mandates, lockdowns and testing systems.

While politically contested, this phase two inquiry report is still valuable for what it reveals.

Deep social divisions

Whether one supported the previous government’s pandemic responses or not, everyone has been affected by those policies which now form a big part of our life stories.

It was the largest fiscal outlay (NZ$70.4 billion) and the biggest national emergency in recent history. That calls for a thorough policy evaluation to help prepare for similar public-health emergencies in future, if not to heal some of the wounds that were opened.

The second report of the royal commission airs many (now familiar) grievances about the vaccine, the vaccine mandates, the lockdowns and their consequences.

Personal submissions to the inquiry reflect a deep social division – and the strength of feelings still associated with that – as well as much support for those policies.

If New Zealanders were to face a similar health emergency in the near future, these often unresolved differences of opinion would reemerge and affect public compliance. New measures would remind people of “last time”.

It doesn’t end the conversation simply to say “thousands of lives were saved”, maybe even 20,000 when compared with the mortality rate in the US. Saving or prolonging lives has consequences for those who live through and pay for the policy choices, especially on such a profound scale.

Unpredictable consequences

Any rational evaluation of the COVID response is inevitably clouded by politics, however, even after all the scientific evidence is weighed up. Using evidence to inform policy is essential, but even the best evidence doesn’t dictate what a whole country ought to do.

Decision-making is political and has consequences, some of which will be unpredictable. In May 2020, for instance, a vaccine strategy was drafted, but the report notes this “did not anticipate the extent to which concerns about vaccine safety would emerge”.

Similarly, no one was predicting the ostracisation of fellow citizens that would follow from vaccine mandates. Many of the personal impacts of that policy are now usefully recorded in the report.

It was already clear before the 2020 election, however, that most National and ACT supporters believed the economic costs of lockdown were too high and outweighed the public-health benefits.

More people, especially on the left, agreed with the Labour-led government’s line that it would damage the economy more in the long run if we had no strict lockdown.

Many people wanted to hang on to “elimination” as a permanent objective; others wanted the country to learn “to live with COVID” – as we now do.

Labour’s resounding 2020 victory may have convinced many that the debate over pandemic policy was won. But there was more to come: controversy over managed isolation and quarantine, and vaccine mandates.

In mid-2022, a spike in inflation induced by the massive fiscal response led to the cost-of-living crisis that became the leading issue in the 2023 election – and which looks set to become a leading issue in this year’s election as well.

Readiness for next time

The second COVID report will inevitably be politicised – in fact, the National Party began scoring points the moment the report’s embargo lifted.

But it’s important differing opinions are heard now, without judgement, to uphold democratic values.

To be serious about a public-health response means to take seriously the word “public” and take account of the effects of policies on people and communities.

That includes the experiences, needs and opinions of the ordinary people who were directly affected by the pandemic and by the government’s policies.

This also means hearing out those who don’t agree with expert advice. Some of the opinions shared with the Royal Commission are, in my opinion, misguided. But they should nonetheless be heard, given the magnitude of the experience and its effects on lives.

Those who support the actions taken by the Ardern government can validly agree that some things could have been done better, as current Labour leader Chris Hipkins has accepted.

Those who don’t support those policies and actions might also accept the Ardern government was making what it judged to be the best decisions with the information at hand, but in the face of deep uncertainty and rapid change.

There was no way through that emergency without some “unkind” measures, and doing nothing was not an option.

Will New Zealand be wiser and better prepared next time? It is to be hoped the Royal Commission’s work will help guide a future government, if and when that next time comes.

ref. Second COVID inquiry: why being politically prepared for the next pandemic is crucial – https://theconversation.com/second-covid-inquiry-why-being-politically-prepared-for-the-next-pandemic-is-crucial-277848

National’s Shane Reti to retire from politics

Source: Radio New Zealand

Shane Reti will retire at the election. RNZ / Mark Papalii

Former National deputy leader Dr Shane Reti has announced he will retire at this year’s election.

The Whangārei MP has been in Parliament since 2014. He lost the Whangārei in 2020, before regaining it in 2023.

Reti is currently minister for universities, science and technology, Pacific peoples, and statistics.

The MP said he was “feeling good” about the decision, and was leaving because he needed to spend time with his family.

Reti teared up as he told RNZ his reasons for leaving.

“I’ve missed many birthdays. I’ve actually missed my family’s weddings as well. There’s only so many birthdays and weddings you can miss.”

He took on the Minister of Health role after the 2023 election, before notably losing the role in a 2025 reshuffle.

Reti said the role was “a wonderful job” and one he was “probably built for,” but was satisfied with the work he had done, particularly expanding the breast cancer screening age.

“There are things that we’d all like to do. But I need to spend time with my family, so it’s not that at all. It’s just time. Even if I had the portfolio, it’s just time.”

He served as National’s deputy leader under Judith Collins, briefly acting as interim leader after Collins lost a vote of no confidence in 2021.

“Yeah, that’s a Trivial Pursuit question coming up with the Young Nats sometime, isn’t it? Look, it was a privilege to be the safe pair of hands the party could turn to in tumultuous times.”

Reti said he “always felt valued” by the party.

“Highlights include progressing the four lanes to Whangārei and advancing policies that as Minister of Health expanded breast cancer screening for 70-74-year-old NZ women and established a 3rd medical school at Waikato,” he said.

“Reshaping the science and technology sector to look more like other small advanced economies that improves benefits to taxpayers has been a privilege – especially amalgamating the seven Crown Research Institutes into three Public Research Organisations.”

While he maintained his practicising certificate, he did not anticipate owning a practice and doing full-time medicine again.

Reti is the fourth National MP to confirm they will not stand at the election, following Collins, Maureen Pugh, and Paulo Garcia. Meanwhile Port Waikato MP Andrew Bayly will not stand in his electorate, and instead seek a place on the list.

With Collins set to leave Parliament in the coming weeks, it means the prime minister may do a wider ministerial reshuffle and return Reti to the backbenches.

Christopher Luxon said Reti was a “stand-up human being” and a “good, good person” who had helped him settle into Parliament when he first arrived in 2020.

“I love him a lot,” Luxon said.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Jury retires in Leman murder trial

Source: Radio New Zealand

Michael Scott Rodger is accused of murdering Richard Leman. RNZ / Nathan Mckinnon

A High Court jury has retired to consider its verdict in the case of a man accused of murdering and dismembering Canterbury father-of-three Richard Leman.

Michael Scott Rodger, 46, is accused of murdering Leman, 41, whose body was found in the boot of his own car parked at an abandoned house in Tyler Street in Rangiora in April 2023.

Leman’s torso was found in the car but his head, legs and arms are still missing.

Rodger denies shooting or killing Leman.

In summing up on Tuesday, Justice Eaton told jurors the evidence of key Crown witnesses Morgan Grant and Sara Plimmer was disputed by Rodger’s lawyers, who claimed the pair lied during the trial.

“The Crown case is that Ms Grant and Ms Plimmer have both given in evidence a truthful, reliable account as to who shot and killed Richard Leman,” he said.

“That is very much contested by the defence and [the Crown] responsibly acknowledges that it will be appropriate for you to exercise real caution when you come to assess the evidence by those two because of everything that has surfaced in this trial.”

In 2024, Grant pleaded guilty to a charge arising from the investigation into Leman’s death, although the details remain suppressed.

Eaton explained to jurors that the onus was on the Crown to prove Rodger’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The Crown argued the objective evidence, including CCTV and telecommunication footage and forensics, proved Rodger was responsible.

Rodger’s lawyers said there was reasonable doubt about who killed Leman and the Crown’s two key witnesses were unreliable.

Defence lawyer Ethan Huda accused the Crown of being underhanded and dishonest by omitting key evidence from a pathologist during closing arguments.

The jury retired to deliberate on Tuesday afternoon.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

5 members of Iranian women’s soccer team defect, Australia deploys RAAF plane and missiles to Gulf

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

The Albanese government has given humanitarian visas to five members of the Iranian women’s soccer team, including its captain, to enable them to remain in Australia, and is offering protection to any more of the women who want to defect.

The elaborate operation to give the women protection culminated late Monday night, with the Australian Federal Police moving the women, who were staying at a Gold Coast hotel, to a safe location.

Home Affairs minister Tony Burke, met with the women at the Gold Coast location. He told a Brisbane news conference early Monday that the women were happy to have their names and photographers released. “They want to be described as who they are.[…] they’re not activists, they’re athletes who want to be safe.”

The women, who were pictured with Burke, are Zahra Ghanbari, captain of the Iranian women’s national football team. Fatemeh Pasandideh, Zahra Sarbali, Atefeh Ramazanzadeh and Mona Hamoudi.

Burke stressed if remaining team members wanted to make a similar decision, “the same opportunity is there. Australia has taken the Iranian women’s soccer team into our hearts.

“These women are tremendously popular in Australia, but we realise they are in a terribly difficult situation with the decisions that they’re making. But the opportunity will continue to be there for them to talk to Australian officials if they wish to.”

Prime Minister Albanese briefed United States President Donald Trump in the early hours of Tuesday on the situation. The call lasted reportedly some 40 minutes and ranged beyond the women.

Trump on his social media platform Truth Social. Truth Social

“President Trump rang me this morning just before 2:00 AM. We had a very positive discussion. He was concerned about the Iranian women in the soccer team and their welfare and their safety if they returned home,” Albanese said at a Tuesday news conference.

The women made a gesture of defiance at their first match of the Asian Cup when they declined to sing their national anthem. They were denounced as traitors on Iranian state TV. At their next match they sang and saluted.

Burke described the scene after “everything had been signed off”.

“There were lots of photos, lots of celebrating, and then a spontaneous outcry of ‘Aussie, Aussie, Aussie, oi, oi, oi’. These women are great athletes, great people, and they’re going to feel very much at home in Australia.”

Deployment of RAAF plane to Gulf

News of the defections came as the government announced the deployment, in response to requests from the region, of an E-7A Wedgetail to the gulf “to help protect and defend Australians and other civilians”.

Albanese said this followed a “conversation that I had with the President Mohammed bin Zayed [of the United Arab Emirates] and other requests”.

The plane – which was recently deployed to Europe as part of assistance to Ukraine – goes with 85 Australian Defence Force personnel, for an initial four weeks. The government is also sending Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles to the UAE.

A Royal Australian Air Force E-7A Wedgetail. Rob Griffith/AP

Albanese stressed that the deployment was purely for defensive purposes. “We’re not taking offensive action against Iran”, he said, and highlighted the large number of Australians in the region.

“The first priority of my government is and always will be to keep Australians safe. There are around 115,000 Australians in the Middle East, around 24,000 of those in the UAE.”

Bowen says don’t panic about fuel

As fuel prices rise sharply the Minister for Climate Change and Energy, Chris Bowen, told Australians “there is no need for panic buying.

“Now, I do have a great deal of concern and empathy for those farmers in particular who, because of the situation with the supply chain in regional Australia, are having difficulty getting diesel.

“But I do need to emphasise this is managing a huge spike in demand, not an impact on supply at this point.”

Minister for Foreign Affairs Penny Wong, Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Minister for Climate Change Chris Bowen arrive at a press conference at Parliament House in Canberra, Tuesday, March 10, 2026. Mick Tsikas/AAP

Bowen said the government was convening a round table of the National Farmers Federation, the oil companies, the peak groups and Trucking Australia, “to ensure that the flow of communication between those groups is as strong as it could be”.

He said the important thing to know was there was “no need to be concerned at this point about the supply of diesel or petrol […] because our stocks are as high as they were before this crisis began. But we do need to work to ensure that as much as possible is flowing to farmers”.

ref. 5 members of Iranian women’s soccer team defect, Australia deploys RAAF plane and missiles to Gulf – https://theconversation.com/5-members-of-iranian-womens-soccer-team-defect-australia-deploys-raaf-plane-and-missiles-to-gulf-277244

Convicted double-murderer Scott Watson granted leave to appeal to Supreme Court

Source: Radio New Zealand

Convicted double-murderer Scott Watson has been granted leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. File picture. Pool / John Kirk-Anderson

Convicted double-murderer Scott Watson has been granted leave to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Watson was sentenced to life imprisonment for murdering Ben Smart and Olivia Hope in the Marlborough Sounds and has now been behind bars for more than 26 years.

The Blenheim friends, aged 21 and 17, were last seen stepping off a water taxi onto a stranger’s yacht in Endeavour Inlet the early hours of 1 January, 1998, after a New Year’s Eve party at Furneaux Lodge. Their bodies have never been found.

Watson was found guilty of the murders in 1999 after an 11-week jury trial involving about 500 witnesses.

He appealed his convictions after the trial but the application was dismissed. He made another two applications that were unsuccessful before a 2017 bid for a royal pardon was granted, with the case heard by the Court of Appeal in 2024.

It focused on the use of photo montages shown to witnesses ahead of the original trial and the reliability of forensic testing used to show two hairs found on Watson’s boat that belonged to Hope.

Watson relied on new expert opinion challenging the reliability of the forensic evidence at trial about the two hairs found on a tiger-patterned blanket aboard his boat.

It also considered whether a photo montage used by police had predisposed witnesses to pick out Watson.

At the original trial, the Crown’s case relied completely on the positive identification of Watson by water taxi driver Guy Wallace, who dropped off the young pair to a stranger’s yacht in the early hours of New Year’s Day.

The court’s decision, released last September, found there was no miscarriage of justice in relation to the hair evidence or the identification of Watson by Wallace.

Watson then sought leave to appeal that decision.

The Supreme Court has granted the appeal in part, approving only the question of whether the Court of Appeal had been correct to conclude no miscarriage of justice arose from the decision of the trial judge to admit visual identification evidence of Wallace.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

’10 classrooms full of children’ – US-Israeli war kills hundreds of Iranian, Lebanese kids

Zahra Sultana has mocked US and Israeli pretensions, saying in a BBC interview on Sunday — International Women’s Day — that the girls in the Minab school were slaughtered “apparently to liberate women”.

SPECIAL REPORT: By Brett Wilkins of Common Dreams

US and Israeli airstrikes have killed nearly 300 Iranian and Lebanese children over the past nine days as the attackers target apartment towers, single-family homes, schools, medical facilities, and other civilian infrastructure.

Iran’s Health Ministry said Sunday that 198 women and 190 minors have been killed by US and Israeli attacks since February 28, including six children under the age of 5. The youngest reported victim is an 8-month-old girl.

Children account for more than 30 percent of those killed, according to the ministry, which also said that 1044 women and 638 children have been injured.

Overall, Iran said that more than 1300 people have been killed by the airstrikes, which are reportedly targeting 30 of the country’s 31 provinces.

The Lebanese Health Ministry announced Sunday that 394 people, including 42 women and 83 children, have been killed by Israel Defence Forces (IDF) attacks after Iran-backed Hezbollah joined the war.

The US-based charity Save the Children noted yesterday that the number of slain Iranian and Lebanese minors is the equivalent of “10 classrooms full of children”.

“It is devastating that airstrikes in Lebanon have reportedly caused the deaths of 83 children… among nearly 300 children killed in the region,” said Save the Children Lebanon director Nora Ingdal.

‘Not just numbers’
“These are not just numbers — these are young lives cut short and children whose futures have been forever scarred by war.”

Israel claims it has killed around 200 Hezbollah fighters. However, the IDF’s routine attacks on apartment towers and other residential buildings have drawn widespread condemnation.

On Sunday, an IDF strike massacred 18 people sheltering in an apartment building in Sir El-Gharbiyeh in Nabatieh district. The building was housing some of the nearly 700,000 Lebanese forcibly displaced by Israeli attacks, including around 200,000 children.

Local officials said women and children were among the victims.

Another IDF aerial massacre in the southern Lebanese town of Tafahata killed eight people, including five members of the Ezzedine family, whose home was bombed.

“This time is much worse than the previous war,” Nabatieh Civil Defence chief Hussein Faqih told the National, referring to Israel’s 2023-25 attacks on Lebanon that killed more than 4000 people, including nearly 800 women and over 300 children, in retaliation for Hezbollah’s rocket strikes in solidarity with Palestine during the Gaza genocide.

Israeli attacks on Iran during last year’s 12-Day War also killed more than 1000 Iranians, including 436 civilians.

Worst reported bombing
In the worst reported bombing of the current war — and possibly the deadliest US massacre since more than 400 Iraqis were wiped out in a “precision strike” on a Baghdad bomb shelter during the 1991 Gulf War — around 175 Iranians, most of them young children, were killed in what first responders and victims’ relatives said was a so-called double-tap strike on an elementary school in Minab in southern Iran.

US military investigators reportedly believe the strike was carried out by US forces, but President Donald Trump has blamed Iran.

On Monday, a group of Democratic US senators lead by Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire said they were “horrified” by the school strike.

“The killing of school children is appalling and unacceptable under any circumstance,” the senators said in a statement. “This incident is particularly concerning in light of [Defence Secretary Pete] Hegseth’s openly cavalier approach to the use of force, including his statement that US strikes in Iran wouldn’t be bound by ‘stupid rules of engagement,’ in his words.”

Multiple members of the UK Parliament have condemned the killing of Iranian and Lebanese children.

Leftist Independent Jeremy Corbyn, a former Labour leader, said yesterday on Bluesky: “Classrooms of children in Iran. Hundreds of people in Lebanon. The ongoing genocide in Gaza. The message from our political and media class is clear: Their lives are less valuable than others.”

“Every human being matters, and every human being deserves a life of peace,” Corbyn added.

‘School girls slaughtered’
Zahra Sultana, who quit Labour and started the socialist Your Party with Corbyn last year, mocked US and Israeli pretensions, saying in a BBC interview on Sunday — International Women’s Day — that the girls in the Minab school were slaughtered “apparently to liberate women”.

Retaliatory attacks by Iran have killed at least 13 Israelis and wounded nearly 2000 others since February 28, according to Israel’s government. No Israeli child deaths have been reported. Seven US troops and at least 15 people in Gulf Arab nations have also been killed by Iranian counterattacks.

While the world’s focus is on Iran, Israeli occupation forces have continued killing and wounding people in Gaza and the West Bank of Palestine.

Drop Site News reported yesterday that eight Palestinians were killed in Gaza over the past 24 hours, including two women and at least as many children.

More than 250,000 Palestinians have been killed or wounded by Israeli forces since the Hamas-led attack of October 7, 2023. More than 20,000 children have been killed and over 44,000 others wounded.

More than 1 in 4 fatalities have been children in a war for which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is wanted by the International Criminal Court for alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes, and Israel is facing a genocide case currently before the International Court of Justice.

Since the 9/11 attacks, US-led wars have left nearly 1 million people dead in more than half a dozen countries in the Middle East, South Asia, and Africa—over 400,000 of them civilians, according to the Costs of War Project at Brown University’s Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs.

“Every war is a war on children, and once again we are seeing them pay the highest price for a conflict they neither started nor had a say in,” Ingdal said yesterday.

“Wars have laws, and children must be off limits in every conflict,” she added. “World leaders must act urgently to prevent further escalation. There must be an immediate cessation of hostilities, and all parties must uphold international humanitarian law and do everything in their power to protect civilians—especially children.”

Republished under Creative Commons.

Article by AsiaPacificReport.nz

Dunedin sex offender Keith Andrew Wicks-Cairns sentenced to preventive detention

Source: Radio New Zealand

Keith Andrew Wicks-Cairns was sentenced at the High Court in Dunedin on 10 March 2026. RNZ / Tess Brunton

– This story discusses details of sexual violation.

A Dunedin sex offender who raped a student after breaking into her Cosy Dell flat has been sentenced to preventive detention, with a period of at least seven years in jail.

Keith Andrew Wicks-Cairns, 37, pleaded guilty to rape, sexual violation and burglary after attacking the woman who was asleep in bed in February last year.

In a victim impact statement read to the Dunedin High Court, the woman said the sexual assault had changed her life in ways she did not expect.

She used to feel confident about her future but was now overcome by anxiety, fear, a deep sense of shame and second-guessed herself.

“Some days I barely recognise myself,” she said.

The woman said she used to love living independently but now struggled to relax in her own home where she should feel safe.

She told the court that she would not let Wicks-Cairns’ cowardice dictate her life and was doing everything in her power to stop him offending again.

Her flatmate told the court she was also on edge after the attack in their home.

She felt disgusted and distressed about what happened and guilty that she woke to police in their home and her flatmate in distress.

She said she felt anxious and stressed in the place she used to feel safe, affecting almost every part of her life.

They bought security cameras and new locks but she still avoided being home alone.

She told the court her friend was strong and she was proud of her.

‘Dealing with the demons’

Justice Harland sentenced Wicks-Cairns to preventive detention with a minimum non-parole period of seven years and three months on Tuesday, saying it was necessary to protect others.

She acknowledged a letter he had written to the judge, in which he said prison was where he needed to be to ensure the safety of others.

“I know prison is where I deserve to be until I’ve dealt with the demons inside,” he said in the letter.

Justice Harland noted he has previous convictions for sex offences, saying Wicks-Cairns had shown little insight into his offending, and his compliance with prison release conditions was poor.

She acknowledged he had an extremely dysfunctional childhood, but said multiple opportunities and interventions to rehabilitate him had failed.

Crown prosecutor Richard Smith said the woman had shown extraordinary strength and courage.

Wicks-Cairns’ offending was aggravated by the home invasion, the detention of the victim, her vulnerability, the violence, pre-meditation and scale of the violations, he said.

Wicks-Cairns was jailed for more than four years in 2013 following sex crimes against two children.

Smith said the victims were also asleep before those assaults.

The letter claiming that his offending was a wake-up call and he was willing to rehabilitate was not to be trusted, he said.

Wicks-Cairns’ was at very high risk of reoffending and had no real insight, remorse or empathy for the woman, rather self pity for getting caught, Smith said.

Wicks-Cairns’ lawyer Joshua Grainger said his client acknowledged the harm he had caused and the incredible impact his crime had on an innocent and undeserving person.

But he argued that his client was not beyond rehabilitation.

‘No-one is going to hear you’

Wicks-Cairns was captured on CCTV wearing dark clothes, a beanie and red shoes on 4 February.

The court heard he had driven around the student quarter in North Dunedin before parking on Queens Street and walking towards Cosy Dell Road.

He covered his face while approaching the woman’s flat, then broke in and went upstairs where she was asleep.

She woke to his hand across her mouth and Wicks-Cairns saying, “you are going to be quiet”.

She struggled, screamed and tried to protect herself but he grabbed her wrists and held her down, the court heard.

Wicks-Cairns told the woman “No-one is going to hear you” before raping and violating her, ignoring her pleas for him to stop.

Afterwards, he made her wash her hands before removing the bottom-fitted sheet from the bed to conceal his offending. He left threatening that he would come back if she told anyone what he had done.

Wicks-Cairns was caught on CCTV running from the flat carrying the sheet.

He told police he did not know what they were talking about when they interviewed him.

Where to get help:

  • Need to Talk? Free call or text 1737 any time to speak to a trained counsellor, for any reason
  • Lifeline: 0800 543 354 or text HELP to 4357
  • Suicide Crisis Helpline: 0508 828 865 / 0508 TAUTOKO. This is a service for people who may be thinking about suicide, or those who are concerned about family or friends
  • Depression Helpline: 0800 111 757 or text 4202
  • Samaritans: 0800 726 666
  • Youthline: 0800 376 633 or text 234 or email talk@youthline.co.nz
  • What’s Up: 0800 WHATSUP / 0800 9428 787. This is free counselling for 5 to 19-year-olds
  • Asian Family Services: 0800 862 342 or text 832. Languages spoken: Mandarin, Cantonese, Korean, Vietnamese, Thai, Japanese, Hindi, and English.
  • Rural Support Trust Helpline: 0800 787 254
  • Healthline: 0800 611 116
  • Rainbow Youth: (09) 376 4155
  • OUTLine: 0800 688 5463
  • Aoake te Rā bereaved by suicide service: or call 0800 000 053

If it is an emergency and you feel like you or someone else is at risk, call 111.

Sexual Violence

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

COVID inquiry phase two: 4 main lessons to improve NZ’s future pandemic resilience

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Murdoch, Distinguished Professor, University of Otago

A second Royal Commission of Inquiry into New Zealand’s experience and handling of the COVID pandemic released its substantial report today, running to several volumes and hundreds of pages.

The coalition government commissioned the inquiry to specifically examine key decisions made between 2021 and 2022, with a focus on vaccine mandates, lockdowns and testing systems.

During this period, New Zealand moved from an elimination strategy, which required strict lockdowns, border closures and social distancing, to an approach of minimisation and protection, including the rollout of vaccines.

Overall, the commission found that:

While our health system and economy may have come through the pandemic better than expected, and New Zealand recorded lower case numbers and fewer deaths per capita than other comparable countries, our society is still counting the cost of the pandemic and the response.

The commission’s report is a reminder of just how many difficult decisions had to be made. It identifies four broad lessons for improving future pandemic resilience.

These lessons matter because pandemics place extraordinary pressure on decision-making systems, health infrastructure and public trust. Preparing those systems before the next crisis arrives is critical.

1. Systems for government decision making

The first lesson focuses on improving the quality and speed of decision making during a crisis.

Looking back at the pandemic, it is clear that many decisions needed to be made quickly with incomplete evidence. Epidemiological models were evolving, real-time data were limited and the wider impacts of interventions such as lockdowns were difficult to estimate.

The commission recommends strengthening strategic capability at the centre of government, including improved data systems, stronger modelling capacity and clearer frameworks for weighing public health benefits against social and economic costs.

This is fundamental. Pandemic responses rely on timely epidemiological information. Without strong surveillance systems and modelling capability, governments risk responding either too late or with measures that are broader and more disruptive than necessary.

Preparedness therefore requires institutional capacity to analyse risk and act quickly on evidence.

2. Clearer legal frameworks for pandemic powers

The second lesson focuses on legislation and democratic safeguards.

During the COVID pandemic, New Zealand relied partly on emergency legislation to implement public health measures such as lockdowns and vaccine mandates. While these powers enabled rapid action, they also raised questions about proportionality and limits on state authority.

The commission recommends establishing pandemic legislation that clearly defines what powers governments can use, under which conditions and safeguards. It says these powers should be transparent, subject to review and grounded in human rights protections.

Legal clarity is also about trust and compliance. Public health measures work best when people understand why they are necessary and believe they are being applied fairly.

3. More agile economic policy

The third lesson addresses the economic shock created by pandemics.

The COVID crisis required large-scale fiscal support for businesses and workers as well as significant monetary policy interventions. The inquiry recommends clearer frameworks for how economic agencies should respond to future pandemics and other crises.

Although economic policy may seem separate from health policy, the connection is strong. Public health measures inevitably affect employment, education and economic activity. Economic insecurity can also worsen health outcomes and widen existing inequities.

A pandemic response therefore needs to integrate public health, economic and social policy, rather than treating them as competing priorities.

4. Planning for social impacts and recovery

The final lesson focuses on the broader social consequences of pandemics.

COVID disrupted education, strained mental health services, affected employment and reshaped community life. It also exposed, and sometimes widened, existing inequities.

The commission highlights the need to plan for these impacts earlier, rather than treating recovery as an afterthought.

This reinforces a long-standing principle that pandemics are not purely biomedical events. They are social crises as well as health emergencies, requiring attention to mental health, social cohesion, community engagement and equity.

Being prepared for next time

While the four lessons describe system-wide challenges, several of the report’s specific recommendations focus directly on strengthening New Zealand’s preparedness.

These include improving the integration and timeliness of disease surveillance systems, expanding national epidemiological modelling capability, and developing structured decision-making frameworks that allow governments to assess the health, economic and social impacts of interventions during a crisis.

The inquiry also emphasises the importance of community engagement and public trust, recommending stronger partnerships with iwi, local organisations and communities that often play a central role in delivering public health responses.

Finally, the report calls for mechanisms to review and adapt pandemic strategies as evidence evolves. The experience of the COVID pandemic showed how quickly circumstances can change as new variants emerge.

Future preparedness therefore requires systems that allow policy to adjust rapidly as scientific knowledge and epidemiological conditions shift.

The commissioners note that the report reflects relatively narrow terms of reference, concentrated on specific policy decisions during 2021 and 2022. Consequently, some wider questions about the pandemic response and preparedness fall outside its scope.

New Zealand’s response to the COVID pandemic protected many lives, particularly in the early stages. This second inquiry makes clear success in one crisis does not guarantee readiness for the next.

Future pandemics will inevitably involve uncertainty and difficult trade-offs. Strengthening the systems that support decision making and public health response will help ensure New Zealand is better prepared for whatever comes next.

ref. COVID inquiry phase two: 4 main lessons to improve NZ’s future pandemic resilience – https://theconversation.com/covid-inquiry-phase-two-4-main-lessons-to-improve-nzs-future-pandemic-resilience-277847

Surf Life Saving strips convicted sex offender Tim Jago of honours, awards and life membership

Source: Radio New Zealand

Tim Jago. RNZ / Nick Monro

Convicted sex offender Timothy Jago has been stripped of his Surf Life Saving honours, awards and life membership.

The disgraced former ACT Party president was found guilty in 2024 of sexually abusing two teenagers in the 1990s.

He was sentenced to two years and six months prison and lost a later appeal against his conviction and sentence.

In an email to members, Surf Life Saving said the move came after a careful and legally guided process.

“At the time of the events referenced, the Northern Region operated as a separate incorporated entity,” chief executive Steve Fisher said.

“Since that time, the Northern Region has been formally incorporated into Surf Life Saving New Zealand.”

Fisher said Surf Life Saving wanted to formally acknowledge the significant impact sexual abuse has on victims and survivors.

“We also recognise that there may be individuals who were present at the time, witnessed concerning behaviour, or felt unable to speak up, and who have carried the weight of these events for many years,” he said.

“If you are someone who has been directly or indirectly affected, we are deeply sorry for the harm caused, and we are committed to supporting you.”

Fisher said Surf Life Saving can offer counselling and confidential support.

An independent lawyer has also been arranged for anyone to provide a formal account to.

“We also acknowledge that further information may emerge, and we remain committed to responding with care, transparency, and responsibility,” Fisher said.

The offending

Jago indecently assaulted two teenagers he met through Surf Lifesaving between 1995 and 1999.

Media were not able to identify him during his trial after he was continually granted interim name suppression.

It took a jury two hours to return unanimous guilty verdicts on all eight charges of indecent assault.

The Crown’s case was that Jago “took advantage” of the two teenagers by giving them alcohol and abusing them when they were “intoxicated, vulnerable and alone”.

Both complainants told similar stories; that they had got drunk at sports club events or social gatherings and woken up in bed with the defendant abusing them.

The police investigated one complaint in 1999, speaking to more than half a dozen witnesses and recording a statement from Jago but did not charge him at the time.

The complainant told police he’d been intoxicated at a social gathering and woke up in Jago’s bed to find Jago squeezing his groin area and putting his own hand on Jago’s pubic area.

The file was re-investigated when a second complainant came forward in late 2022 after seeing Jago in a news article.

The second complainant told police he was assaulted on two separate occasions, where he had been drinking with Jago and others, become drunk and found himself in bed with Jago.

He told the police the man touched his penis, put his own penis on the complainant’s anus and touched the complainant’s anus with his hands.

The second complainant had not disclosed the abuse to the police when he had been contacted in early 2000, as part of the 1999 police investigation.

Jago’s lawyer Ian Brookie suggested the second complainant made his allegations up because Jago had done well for himself in a political role.

Crown prosecutor Rebekah Thompson later pointed out this did not square with the fact the man had told his sister about the abuse in the 1990s.

Jago had been the ACT Party’s president for nearly four years when he resigned from the role in late January 2023.

Timeline

  • 1995 – Jago indecently assaults 15 year old
  • 1997 – Jago indecently assaults same teenager
  • 1999 – Jago indecently assaults second teenager
  • 1999 – Second teenager makes police complaint, police investigate, no charges
  • 7 November 2022 – Complainant’s wife messages ACT Party leader David Seymour
  • 19 January 2023 – Jago arrested, charged and bailed
  • 25 January 2023 – First court appearance
  • 26 January 2023 – Jago reported as resigning as ACT president
  • 19 August 2024 – Jago’s week-long jury trial starts at the Auckland District Court
  • 26 August 2024 – Jury returns unanimous guilty verdicts to all eight charges of indecent assault
  • 22 November 2024 – Jago sentenced to two-and-a-half years’ imprisonment
  • 31 January 2025 – Jago abandons appeal of district courts decision to decline him ongoing name suppression

Where to get help:

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Covid-19 response inquiry finds government’s response effective but late, poorly communicated

Source: Radio New Zealand

Central Auckland on 25 August 2021 on day eight of a Covid-19 lockdown. RNZ / John Edens

The second phase of the Covid-19 response inquiry has found the government’s response was effective but late and not communicated well enough to people.

The country’s transition from its early elimination strategy to suppression and minimisation was “far from smooth”, with consequences like the Auckland lockdown going on longer than needed at the end of 2021, the report, released on Tuesday said.

The second phase tested if the government took a balanced approach and found it largely did, but said the public was not brought on board – and must be in the next pandemic, with one of the 24 recommendations made today that there should be more open decision making in future around the impacts on people’s isolation, health and incomes.

“The evidence shows these factors were considered when many decisions were made. Ideally, though, decision-makers would have been better supported with clearer, more specific evidence about the effects of public health measures,” said the 530-plus-page report by the Royal Commission of Inquiry.

“More comprehensive and robust response strategies should have been in preparation much earlier.”

Public divisions and anger over the pandemic response in part prompted the second phase begun in December 2022, amid questions if phase one had gone far enough. Phase two was a bit shorter and more focused especially on how Covid mandates were rolled out.

The second report echoed the first in finding the early elimination strategy saved lives but the country was not well prepared; as the inquiry chair said in 2024, “The wheels became a bit wobbly.”

The government is now considering both phase one and two recommendations.

Health Minister Simeon Brown will table the government’s responses to them all, as required, by July.

The report itself described how the country got into a cul-de-sac on Covid.

Officials should have started working on a suppression strategy much earlier in 2021, but did not look at alternatives so it became hard to stop and rethink, it said.

“Strategies should have considered a range of scenarios (such as an uncontained community outbreak or new strains of COVID-19) and options to address them.

“They should also have identified the trade-offs to be considered if such scenarios arose.”

It looked in depth at whether the government got enough advice especially around the potentially divisive impacts of responses on social cohesion, health and businesses among other things.

“These key decisions involved some very significant and far-reaching uses of government power to limit the ability of New Zealanders to move about, meet with others, and to attend public events,” said the report.

Brown in a media briefing on Tuesday focused in on what he said were the findings that the previous government ignored evidence, advice and warnings, and so chose bad options around vaccines, the length of lockdown restrictions and mistargeted economic stimulus.

“Options were available to end restrictions earlier, options were available to not have as stimulus an economic response, and ultimately New Zealanders are paying the price of that still today,” he said.

Phase two looked at four areas of pandemic response from February 2021 to October 2022:

  • vaccine approval and safety.
  • vaccine mandates, including the introduction of the Vaccination Assessment Tool and vaccine passes.
  • national and regional lockdowns.
  • the procurement, development and distribution of testing and tracing technologies.

“These topics, and the time period covered … capture some of the most difficult and divisive elements of New Zealand’s pandemic response,” the report said.

Phase two unpacked four broad lessons by making 24 recommendations.

The four lessons were:

  • To improve systems that promote good decision-making by the government.
  • To enact legislation for pandemics as the key guard-rail for rights and freedoms.
  • Do more shock-proofing of government economic policies.
  • Set up research into pandemic responses to communicate clearly to the public.

The 24 recommendations for the government and agencies included:

  • Develop options before “the next pandemic” for income and business support during one.
  • Develop clear legislation for managing future pandemics that clearly defines the scope and limits of emergency powers.
  • Publish advice about how human rights might be impacted.
  • Look at establishing a new strategy body at the core of government that can improve the data about impacts on people from pandemic measures.
  • Produce regulatory impact statements in future pandemics, and update the Cabinet rules so pandemic decisions get reviewed.
  • Present any elimination strategies as temporary from the start.
  • Research unconventional monetary policies in case of a big shock.
  • Research into how to get back to normal.
  • Be open with the public about decision-making in a pandemic.
  • Get an agency to look at how to build trust and social cohesion.

Brown stressed at the media briefing the Auckland lockdown went on too long despite Cabinet having options to end it earlier in late 2021.

Economic warnings from Treasury “were not heeded”, he said in a statement, with the commission finding about half the $60 billion Covid response and recovery fund stimulus was not related to the pandemic; so-called shovel-ready infrastructure projects were not ready.

He said Labour’s health minister Ayesha Verrall should have done more to question the Health Ministry around the advice it had about vaccine risks for 12-17 year olds.

The ministry was advised against applying a two-dose vaccine mandate to them due to myocarditis risks but that mandate carried on.

He called on Hipkins and Verrall to explain.

“The reality is Chris Hipkins stood up every single day and he said to New Zealanders that he was making decisions based on advice by health officials. That’s what he told us.

“The reality is, in a number of these instances, he was not. And only now that this report has been released do we find out that he was not making those decisions on the basis of health advice.”

RNZ approached the Labour MPs for a response.

In a statement, Hipkins said their decisions were “considered, appropriate, and guided by the best evidence available at the time”.

“Ministers and officials were making decisions in an unprecedented global crisis, using the best evidence available at the time. These decisions helped protect New Zealanders.”

The key was to use the lessons, but instead over the past two years the government had cut public health capability while commissioning multiple reviews that repeated the same conclusions, he said.

The second phase gathered evidence for 15 months. Jacinda Ardern, Chris Hipkins and Grant Robertson all refused to appear at public hearings but said they had provided ample evidence privately to the commission.

In a joint statement Jacinda Ardern and Grant Robertson said the findings of the second phase of the report were similar to the first.

“We got a lot right. More than most. But there are areas that could have been better.

“While in office we established the Royal Commission to independently compile what worked, and what we could learn from. We accept the overall findings and recommendations of both reports.

The job now is to ensure NZ is better prepared for the next pandemic. We join the Commission in urging the Government to take the findings of both reports and implement them as a matter of urgency.

“The Commission’s observation – ‘there is no scenario in which NZ – or any other country – could have confronted the pandemic without some cost’ will be just as true for the next time. Our best safeguard is to ensure we are as well prepared as we can be.

“Over the last four years, we have fully cooperated with both phases of the inquiry, including many hours of interviews, and wish to extend our thanks to the Royal Commission staff for their important work on behalf of New Zealand.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Air NZ suspends earning guidance amid global jet fuel markets volatility

Source: Radio New Zealand

File photo. Air New Zealand suspended its earnings guidance over ‘unprecedented’ volatility in fuel prices. RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King

Nelson’s mayor says smaller centres are rattled by a warning from Air New Zealand it may have make changes to where it flies and how often.

The national carrier has suspended the earnings guidance it issued less than two weeks ago because of what it said was unprecedented volatility in jet fuel markets.

The airline expects a meaningful impact on its second half earnings.

Air New Zealand said it had put in place initial fare changes, but said it may need to hike prices and adjust its network and schedule “as required”.

Nelson mayor Nick Smith said there was a “huge amount of nervousness in regional New Zealand” over the possibility of Air New Zealand reviewing services.

“We get that they’re under enormous financial pressure with the big loss they announced a couple of weeks ago, as well as the heightened fuel prices, the hope will be that they maintain the set of destinations across New Zealand they do, albeit understanding the frequency of some of those services may be reduced,” he said.

“I’m advocating very strongly on behalf of Nelson, as other mayors will be doing, that if we are to rebuild the tourism industry, we don’t want to have it excessively focused on the Queenstowns and the Rotoruas that are already busy.”

Smith said he was due to meet with Air New Zealand in the next couple of weeks.

“I hope there will be some consultation with mayors and regional leaders as they try and work through how they can be economically viable while at the same time maintain these vital services to regions like Nelson.”

The Nelson mayor said flights were “so important” to regional New Zealand.

“The loss of an air service can have a body blow impact on regional centres,” he said.

Smith said Nelson was a busy airport.

“But even for us, maintaining the frequency and range of destinations is just so important for the future of the Nelson region.”

Timaru mayor Nigel Bowen told RNZ that as a smaller centre, Timaru valued its connection into Wellington.

“We have significant concerns when global events affect fuel prices,” he said.

“We have historically a good working relationship with Air New Zealand and would expect, with any potential changes, that we are brought into the conversation.”

Taupō mayor John Funnell said he would encourage Air New Zealand to keep its services there.

“The airport has been working with Air New Zealand to remind them that it is a popular destination,” he said.

In its market statement the national carrier said the difference in the crack spread price – the margin charged by refineries – had jumped from US$22 barrel to as high as US$115.

Airlines are charged for the Brent Crude price of a barrel of oil – hovering around $US100 – and the crack spread price.

Oil prices fell on Tuesday, with the benchmark Brent Crude down 6 percent to around US$87 a barrel, after rising above $115 on Monday (NZ time).

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Politics live: Shane Reti announces retirement from politics, Stanford says National had ‘a bad week’

Source: Radio New Zealand

Follow all the latest news with RNZ’s live blog above.

MPs are back at Parliament today for caucus meetings and the House back in session, after a weekend of speculation about Christopher Luxon’s leadership and economic uncertainty over the Iran war.

Follow all the latest news with RNZ’s live blog at the top of this page.

RNZ / Mark Papalii

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Kaimanawa horse muster to go ahead after funding uncertainty

Source: Radio New Zealand

A previous muster takes place. EMMA GRANT / SUPPLIED

  • Kaimanawa horse muster to go ahead this year after funding uncertainty
  • Charity founder says horse numbers would explode if no muster takes place, and horses would be culled
  • Homes needed for just under 150 horses expected to be rounded up this year

This year’s muster of Kaimanawa wild horses in the Central North Island will go ahead after the Department of Conservation backed down from plans not to fund it.

That decision’s been welcomed by a champion of the horses, who said they were at risk of getting culled if numbers weren’t controlled with an annual muster.

The department said it was targeting a population of about 300 horses, which was more than 200 fewer than the number roaming military-owned land in the Central Plateau.

Mega muster of 149 horses

Kaimanawa Legacy Foundation founding board member Kelly Wilson said it and fellow charity, the Kaimanawa Heritage Horses Welfare Society, were approached by DoC a few weeks ago, saying this year’s muster was to happen in late March but if the charities wanted it to go ahead they’d have to fund it.

Kelly Wilson rides Patriotic, which was born to Kaimanawa horses, on her Taupō property. EMMA GRANT / SUPPLIED

“[This] put us into quite a predicament because, obviously, it’s really high priority that we keep the herd at a sustainable number, because as it escalates the risk of culling as a management tool becomes higher,” Wilson said.

“But, obviously, with no notice to be able to come up with that kind of budget is almost impossible. The musters cost anywhere from $80,000 to $130,000, depending on how many horses are moved from the mountains, and there was real concern that this year a muster wouldn’t be happening.”

The charities negotiated with DoC, which offered a couple of compromise deals, before discussions with its director-general resulted in the department agreeing to pick up the tab for a “mega muster” in April, as well as using immunocontraception – fertility control – on 50 horses.

Wilson said this year’s muster would aim to remove 149 horses from the mountains, leaving about 400.

If horse numbers weren’t managed, they’d hit 1100 in three years.

Kaimanawa horses are mustered annually. (File photo) Supplied/Kimber Brown

If the department hadn’t changed its mind about funding the muster, Wilson wasn’t sure the charities would have found the money for it.

“The problem with raising that money is that we’re also in the time period where we are actively fundraising to help save horses.

“Kaimanawa Heritage Horses fundraisers during this time to support welfare cases and Kaimanawa Legacy Foundation is fundraising to support initial handling subsidies, which can be a deal breaker for someone considering rehoming a horse, because having a $1000 subsidy towards the horse’s training cost can be a make or break for a potential owner looking to save a life.”

If the muster didn’t happen and the horse population rose, culling would likely be the only available means of population control left.

Last year 226 were taken and it was a “mammoth task” to find homes for that many, a task that would be hard to repeat, Wilson said.

For now, the charities were focused on rehoming horses from this year’s muster.

Applications for horses closed in early April and so far there had only been five, Wilson said.

New approach to population control sought

A shot from the 2024 muster. (File photo) Kaimanawa Heritage Horses

DoC’s Taupō operations manager Dave Conley said details for this year’s muster, such as cost, weren’t fully finalised, but he confirmed the department would fund it.

“The Kaimanawa Wild Horse Advisory Group will meet later this week to finalise the planning and operational components of the muster,” he said.

That group included the charities, iwi and the Defence Force.

“DoC originally declined to fund this year’s muster due to internal budget reprioritisation and recent shifts in conservation focus and funding priorities,” he said.

“This has changed because we are now considering an approach that would allow a muster to proceed this year while potentially eliminating the need for one next year.”

That included piloting the use of contraceptives for horses.

Conley said no decisions had been made about future musters.

“The department initiated a population management programme in 1995 to maintain the Kaimanawa wild horse herd at a sustainable level and minimise impacts on rare and threatened plant species in the Moawhango Ecological Zone.

“The long‑standing population target is 300 horses, which is considered sufficient to maintain genetic diversity in the horse herd.”

The horses had lived in the area for more than a century.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Auckland mayor Wayne Brown sees no issue with low voter turnout

Source: Radio New Zealand

Auckland mayor Wayne Brown. RNZ/Marika Khabazi

Auckland mayor Wayne Brown says it is not his council’s responsibility to get people to vote in local elections.

Less than a third of Aucklanders voted in the 2025 local elections. Just 29 percent or 345,004 registered electors voted, the lowest turnout of the past three elections.

The number of special votes increased by 33 percent compared to 2022. But just over 60 percent of the 9306 special votes cast had to be thrown out, due to people not filling out their ballots properly.

At its Policy and Planning Committee meeting on Tuesday, Auckland councillors finalised their submission to the government as part of an inquiry into the 2025 local elections.

The council’s submission recommends that local elections change to booth voting run by the Electoral Commission instead of private contractors, and that a national review of voting methods for local elections, including online voting, be conducted.

The submission stated that postal voting was no longer fit-for-purpose and had proven reliability issues.

It also said compulsory voting should be considered to increase participation.

Brown said he did not see an issue with low turnout.

But he supported his fellow councillors’ calls to move to in-person voting in 2028.

“Postal voting has kind of had its day. Let’s do the same as what the government do. Just have a day when you all go out, and if you don’t go out, too bloody bad.

“If people aren’t bothered to vote, then we should respect that. They have chosen not to vote.”

The mayor said central government elections should not have a different voting system from local elections.

“The main point I would like to see in our submission is why the central government feel they deserve a better system than we get. It’s not as if they get better people.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

ANZCO working to get shipment of beef destined for Middle East back to New Zealand

Source: Radio New Zealand

File image. 123RF

Meat company ANZCO is working to get shipments of beef caught up in the Middle East conflict back to New Zealand to sell on the domestic market.

General manager of sales and marketing Rick Walker said shipments of premium beef cuts that were on the way to Dubai have been parked by shipping companies in various ports.

“We only had a handful of containers on route to Dubai so our exposure is very small compared to some other meat companies but we are now in the process of figuring out what the best alternative is for those containers is – whether we bring them home or we find another market for them.

“It depends on the product and what its end use was going to be, but a lot of it will come back to New Zealand.”

Walker said some of the beef has specific Arabic labelling which would make it difficult to transfer it into other markets.

“So it’s probably easier to bring it back to New Zealand, we can find homes for it here in the domestic market. There’s good demand here, so that’s probably the easiest answer for us at the moment.”

Walker said the containers are chilled so the meat has a shelf life of about 120 days.

“It’s important to remember we are only a week into dealing with this – so we do have time but at the same time we are not going to wait, we want to make decisions pretty quickly.”

So with shipments of meat bound for the Middle East possibly returning to New Zealand – could consumers be in for cheaper cuts? Walker doesn’t think so.

“I think that’s a big step to take, it will depend again on what cuts are coming back, are they chilled? Are they frozen? Every company will then have to make its decision on frozen product. Do you bring it back into inventory and then make a decision what to do with it from there in terms of other export opportunities?

“So in theory, more supply in New Zealand provides the opportunity for lower prices, but it’s hard to see that really playing out at any level that’s going to be material in the short term, particularly when we’ve got very tight livestock numbers here in New Zealand at the moment and very high livestock prices.”

Walker said demand for red meat around the world is high – so going forward any product that would have gone to the Middle East can go to other markets like the US and Asia.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Battle of Kororāreka remembrance ceremony to mark key moment in history of Aotearoa

Source: Radio New Zealand

People gather at dawn atop Maiki Hill, or Flagstaff Hill, for the 175th anniversary of the Battle of Kororāreka in 2020. Peter de Graaf

A ceremony on a Bay of Islands hilltop at dawn on Wednesday aims to preserve the memory of a war that changed New Zealand history – and make sure the stories are passed on to a new generation.

Early on 11 March, 1845, fighters loyal to Ngāpuhi chief Hone Heke chopped down the flagpole at Russell, then still better known as Kororāreka, for the fourth time.

The felling of the flagstaff was a signal for men led by Hone Heke and Ngāti Hine chief Te Ruki Kawiti to attack the Bay of Islands town.

In the ensuing battle most of the town’s European inhabitants were evacuated to Auckland, and about 20 Māori and 13 Britons were killed.

It was the start of the wider Northern War which raged until early 1846, culminating in the famous, but inconclusive, battle of Ruapekapeka Pā.

Kororāreka Marae chairwoman Deb Rewiri said remembering events such as the Battle of Kororāreka was as important as observing Anzac Day.

“Because if you think about it, the foundation of Aotearoa New Zealand was being played out here in the North at that time,” Rewiri said.

She expected a large crowd for Wednesday’s 181st anniversary because of the nationwide interest sparked by the Battle of Ruapekapeka Pā commemorations in January.

The ceremony would begin at 6.45am with a service at Maiki Hill, or Flagstaff Hill, then continue at Christ Church, New Zealand’s oldest surviving church.

Navy sailor Brandyn Sigley lays a wreath at the HMS Hazard memorial during the 175th anniversary commemorations of the Battle of Kororāreka in 2020. Peter de Graaf

There, members of the Royal New Zealand Navy would lay a wreath at the grave of sailors from the HMS Hazard who died in the battle.

Karakia would also be held at a nearby kōhatu (stone) marking the spot where the first blood was spilled.

Commemorations would wrap up at Haratu Marae, on the town’s waterfront, where children from Te Kura o Kororāreka (Russell School) would raise a new kara (flag) and be presented with a paraikete (blanket) embroidered with their impressions of the battle.

Rewiri said she was inspired to get local children involved after attending Treaty commemorations in Mangungu, in South Hokianga, last month.

The outbreak of war in the Middle East made tomorrow’s ceremony all the more relevant.

“We’re a little bit removed from that, but also I think it’s not so much about a war going on, but there’s certainly levels of deprivation within our own country, so holding fast to the past reminds us of how resilient and purposeful our tūpuna were. Their aim was to help us to grow so that we are all thriving, and this is what we hope to do.”

Kororāreka Marae chairwoman Deb Rewiri. RNZ / Peter de Graaf

She said the reasons Hone Heke and Kawiti went in to battle included what they saw as erosion of their tino rangatiratanga and the government’s failure to adhere to Te Tiriti, signed just five years earlier.

At the Ruapekapeka commemorations in January, Ngāti Hine leader Pita Tipene said economic factors also played a part, with the government’s decision to shift the capital from Ōkiato (near Russell) to Auckland leading to a sharp drop in trade.

Rewiri said during the battle, fighters gave fleeing civilians safe passage out to ships waiting to evacuate them to Auckland.

“They didn’t want to harm those people. Their disagreement was not with them but with the Crown, and that continues today. We’re in 2026 and we still have that battle, back at the Crown.”

Rewiri said there was little parking at Maiki Hill so those keen to take part in the dawn ceremony were encouraged to take one of the shuttles leaving from Haratu Marae and Kororāreka Museum starting at 6.15am.

For those coming across the water, the first car ferry from Ōpua was due to leave at 6am.

The current flagpole atop Te Maiki Hill was erected in 1858 by Maihi Parāone Kawiti, a son of Te Ruki Kawiti, as a symbol of national unity and reconciliation.

It survived a wild fire in 1913 and serious vandalism in 2022.

The new flag to be raised at Haratu Marae, called Kororāreka Whakaora, was designed by Lyall Hakaraia (Ngāti Kuta, Patukeha) of the British Museum.

Rewiri said about 200 people were expected to take part in the commemorations.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

I’ve studied MAGA rhetoric for a decade, and this is what I see in Hegseth’s boasts, action-movie one-liners and gloating over dominance

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Casey Ryan Kelly, Professor of Communication Studies, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

When Secretary of Defense James Mattis addressed the intensification of U.S. combat operations against the Islamic State group in 2017, he assured the American public of his commitment to “get the strategy right” while maintaining “the rules of engagement” to “protect the innocent.”

Mattis’ professional tone was a stark contrast to Secretary Pete Hegseth’s remarks following the first days of the joint U.S.-Israeli combat operations in Iran.

On March 2, 2026, after bragging about the awe-inspiring lethality of U.S. “B-2s, fighters, drones, missiles,” Hegseth casually brushed aside concerns about long-term geopolitical strategy, declaring “no stupid rules of engagement, no nation-building quagmire, no democracy building exercise, no politically correct wars. We fight to win.”

Admonishing the press for anything less than total assent, he commanded, “to the media outlets and political left screaming ‘endless wars:’ Stop. This is not Iraq.”

Two days later, Hegseth gloated about “dominance” and “control,” while asserting that the preoccupation of the “fake news media” with casualties was motivated by liberal media bias and hatred of President Trump.

“Tragic things happen; the press only wants to make the president look bad,” he said. He dismissed concerns about the rules of engagement, declaring that “this was never meant to be a fair fight. We are punching them while they are down, as it should be.”

Pete Hegseth’s Pentagon press conference, at which he asserted the Iran war would have no ‘No stupid rules of engagement, no nation building quagmire, no democracy-building exercise.’

I’m a communication scholar who has studied MAGA rhetoric for a decade. I have observed how Hegseth and other officials in the second Trump administration refuse to abide by what recurring rhetorical situations – urgent public matters that compel speech to audiences capable of being influenced – typically demand of public officials.

The theme of this administration is that no one is going to tell it what to say or how to say it. It will be encumbered neither by norms nor the exigencies that compel speech in a democratic society.

The big man

When the U.S. goes to war, the public expects the president and the defense secretary to convince them of the appropriateness of the action. They do this by detailing the justification for military action, but also by addressing the public in a manner that conveys the seriousness and competence required for such a grave task as waging war.

But during the first week of the Iran war, Hegseth’s press briefings deviated from the measured tone expected from high-ranking military officials.

Hegseth flippantly employed villainous colloquialism – “they are toast and they know it,” “we play for keeps,” and “President Trump got the last laugh” – delivered with a combative tone that communicated masculine self-assurance.

Many observers were taken aback by his haughty tone, hypermasculine preoccupation with domination, giddiness about violence and casual attitude toward death.

During Trump’s first term, this penchant for rule-breaking was by and large isolated to the president, whose transgressions were part of his populist appeal.

Although Trump’s first cabinet members agreed on most political objectives, they attempted to rein in what they saw as the president’s more dangerous whims.

But with loyalty as the new bona fide qualification for administration officials, Trump’s second cabinet is populated with a large contingent of right and far-right media personalities like Hegseth, including Kash Patel, Sean Duffy and Mehmet Oz.

The anti-institutional ethos of far-right media explains why these officials refuse to conform to “elite” expectations and instead speak in a manner that is bombastic, outrageous and perverse.

Among them, there is little reverence for what they may perceive of as emasculating rules of tradition and politeness in a media marketplace where “owning,” “dominating,” and “triggering” your enemy is precious currency. Far-right media personalities are adept at commanding attention with showmanship and swagger.

Trump appears to have chosen Hegseth for precisely this reason: He performs the role of the big man to perfection.

“They are toast and they know it,” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said of Iran on March 4, 2026.

‘Kill talk’

Hegseth’s language choices and petulant tone do not demonstrate an ignorance of what rhetorical situations demand of him; instead, they reflect a refusal to be emasculated by such cumbersome norms.

When making statements about the first week of the war, Hegseth grinned as he delivered action-movie one-liners, like “turns out the regime who chanted ‘Death to America’ and ‘Death to Israel’ was gifted death from America and death from Israel.”

Hegseth engaged in what is known as “kill talk,” a verbal strategy, typically directed at new military recruits, that denies the enemy’s humanity and disguises the terrible costs of violence. His repetition of words like “death,” “killing,” “destruction,” “control,” “warriors” and “dominance” framed violence in heroic terms that are detached from the realities of war.

In my view, Hegseth addressed the public as a squad leader addresses military recruits. Hegseth apparently delighted in dispensing death and elevating and glorifying war. He said virtually nothing of long-term strategy beyond “winning.”

In the MAGA media world, winning is really all that matters. If winning is the only goal, then war is, by profound inference, a game, a test of masculine fortitude.

This point was made clear when the White House posted a video that interspersed footage of airstrikes on Iran with “killstreak animation” from the popular video game Call of Duty: Modern Warfare. In the game, when a player kills multiple opponents without also dying, they are rewarded with the ability to conduct a missile strike to exterminate an opposing team. Again, this message gamifies violence and obscures the destructive toll of war.

Informed by the contemptuous hypermasculinity of far-right media culture, all this taboo behavior and glorified portrayals of death convey one fundamental message: When the public most needs explanation and justification for the actions of their government, the powerful owe the public neither explanation – nor comfort.

ref. I’ve studied MAGA rhetoric for a decade, and this is what I see in Hegseth’s boasts, action-movie one-liners and gloating over dominance – https://theconversation.com/ive-studied-maga-rhetoric-for-a-decade-and-this-is-what-i-see-in-hegseths-boasts-action-movie-one-liners-and-gloating-over-dominance-277731

Serious injuries following crash at Isla Bank, west of Invercargill

Source: Radio New Zealand

One person was injured. (File photo) St John

A person has been seriously injured in a two-vehicle crash at Isla Bank, west of Invercargill.

The road was closed at the intersection of Fairfax-Isla Bank and Isla Bank-Flints Bush Roads as a result of the crash shortly after 8.30am on Tuesday.

The serious crash unit was investigating, police said.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Aid organisations fighting to stay in Gaza, unable to get much-needed supplies into city

Source: Radio New Zealand

Medecins Sans Frontieres is determined to stay in Gaza despite requirements from Israel to supply extensive details of staff and funding. Medecins Sans Frontieres

Aid organisations in Gaza, say they have been unable to get supplies or staff into the city since January.

A court temporarily blocked a decision by Israel to ban 37 aid organisations for failing to cooperate with new rules.

Those rules included registering names and contact details of staff with Israeli authorities as well as providing details of the group’s funding.

Médecins Sans Frontières, also known as, Doctors Without Borders’ (MSF) executive director for New Zealand and Australia, Tom Roth, told Nine to Noon, the organisation had been discussing with authorities why they needed that information and what it would be used for.

He said there were fears about staff being targeted using the information and so far there had been no assurances on how that information would be used.

Despite the court temporarily blocking the decision, supplies and staff had not been able to enter Gaza since January, Roth said.

He described the situation as “catastrophic”.

“Eighty percent of the infrastructure [in Gaza] has been destroyed, it’s a massive catastrophe… Palestinians are struggling just with basic shelter. They are living within 40 percent of Gaza’s land mass, living in tents trying to survive without access to food, water and medical assistance.”

Displaced Palestinians warm up by the fire. (File photo) NurPhoto via AFP

Roth said there had been limited food in Gaza since before the ceasefire, and even with it there had still been limited amounts of food coming in.

“There’s an obligation under international humanitarian law that Israel is required to allow unhindered humanitarian access for NGO’s.”

Roth said after the new rules came in last year, a petition was taken to the Supreme Court to overthrow the registration ban.

He said an injunction to stop it being implemented was now in place, but by the time it was put in place, MSF has already removed staff from Gaza.

“We’ve requested staff and supplies to come into Gaza since then and that has been refused.

“We’re still waiting for the Israeli government’s response to it.”

MSF had no international staff in Gaza and the West Bank at present, Roth said, but Palestinian staff remained, which made up about 80 percent of the staff.

“So we have and will continue to operate in Gaza for as long as possible.”

However, Roth said staff needed the means to do their job, including the supply of medical equipment which at the moment was unable to replenished, he said.

“People are living in tents desperately searching for food, for water, there’s thousands of people needing urgent medical attention.

“It would take five years to evacuate the children needing urgent medical evacuation. It’s heartbreaking we’re put in this situation.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Documents reveal why staff didn’t tell minister about Jevon McSkimming allegations

Source: Radio New Zealand

Disgraced former deputy police commissioner Jevon McSkimming was sentenced to nine months home detention in December after pleading guilty to charges relating to possessing objectionable publications. RNZ / Mark Papalii

A police staffer who was asked to not circulate emails containing allegations about disgraced former Deputy Commissioner Jevon McSkimming “assumed” then Police Commissioner Andrew Coster would brief the Police Minister.

However, the Minister says it wasn’t until almost nearly two years later that he was first informed of the allegations against McSkimming.

Why 36 emails containing allegations about McSkimming were diverted from Mark Mitchell’s office to Coster’s office without the Police Minister seeing them became one of the central questions to come following the scathing report by the Independent Police Conduct Authority in November.

  • Do you know more? Email sam.sherwood@rnz.co.nz

Protocol was to forward emails to police commissioner’s office bypassing minister

A protocol had been put in place for police staff in Mitchell’s ministerial office to forward the emails directly to then-Commissioner Andrew Coster’s office, and not share them with Mitchell or his political staff, he said.

RNZ has obtained under the OIA a copy of a handwritten file note by Police’s manager of Ministerial Services Lee Hodgson dated 17 January, 2024.

In the note Hodgson wrote that someone had brought some emails to her attention that they had come across in the minister’s mailbox while clearing a backlog of correspondence.

“They related to anonymous allegations about Jevon.”

Hodgson wrote that the staffer gave her hard copies of the emails. Hodgson said she brought them to the attention of then Director of the Commissioner’s office Maria Rawiri who said the commissioner and other members of the executive had received “similar emails and they were being dealt with together”.

Hodgson was asked to give the hard copies to another staffer who was working with former Deputy Commissioner Tania Kura on them.

“Maria asked me not to circulate them any further as they were unsubstantiated anonymous allegations.”

Hodgson then called her colleague and told her they had been asked to send any further such emails to the commissioner’s office.

‘I felt assured that the allegations were going to be assessed’ – staffer

Assistant Commissioner Tusha Penny said that on 11 November, the file note was typed up with additional detail that Hodgson recalled from memory to create a digital record after Mitchell’s office sought clarification about how such emails had been managed.

Hodgson said Rawiri asked her not to circulate them further in the Minister’s office or within police as they were “unsubstantiated anonymous allegations”.

In the file note, Hodgson said she had also given her manager a “verbal heads up” after telling her colleague to send any further such complaints to her which she would then forward on to the Commissioner’s office.

“I felt assured that the allegations were going to be assessed (and considered by Fixated Threat Assessment Centre) under independent oversight by Deputy Commissioner Tania Kura. I assumed the Commissioner would be verbally briefing the Minister, as is usual with sensitive matters.”

On 12 November, a staffer from Mitchell’s office wrote to Police Commissioner Richard Chambers in relation to Mitchell’s emails.

“It is important that Police can provide this office with some assurances and change their processes accordingly.”

The staffer said Mitchell needed assurance that previous correspondence addressed to him and referred to Police for action had been “actioned appropriately” and that the procedure instated by Coster, and any similar, was limited to just the issue for which it was put in place.

“I understand there may be other practises around where emails on certain topics should be sent. Unless there is a good explanation for it, that should stop. All emails referred to Police by the Minister should go to the same place at Police for assessment and action as appropriate. Any approach taken currently that departs from this should be stopped.

“I also understand that previously feedback has been provided to this office on what has happened in relation to an email referred to Police (actions taken etc), however this practise has over time lapsed and stopped. That needs to be restarted.”

The staffer said employees had been put in “highly uncomfortable positions and that is not fair and should not be allowed to continue”.

“Correspondence referred from the Minister’s office needs to be treated transparently and in the same way, and deserves a genuine assessment and response from Police. I would appreciate having that assurance from you directly.”

Current Police Commissioner not aware Coster had asked for different correspondence protocol

In response, Chambers said he was not aware that Coster had asked for a different process to be put in place to deal with correspondence.

“This is obviously a departure from the well understood and accepted processes for dealing with correspondence relevant to a Minister’s portfolio and the persons and agencies to which they relate. This includes feedback mechanisms.”

Former police commissioner Andrew Coster. RNZ / Samuel Rillstone

Chambers said Ministerial Services had a “key role” in supporting Mitchell’s office and should be the “single channel for all correspondence relevant to the interface between Police and the Minister’s office”.

“This includes the role of agency private secretaries whose role it is to provide support to the Minister’s office. It is disappointing to learn that staff were under instruction to depart from these systems and processes and I apologise to any staff, either in the Minister’s office or Ministerial Services who were put into this unfortunate situation.”

Chambers had copied in the Chief Operating Officer and Executive Director who would discuss to ensure systems, processes and expectations were “well understood and in place”, and that the Minister and Minister’s office received the assurance they sought going forward and in respect of previous correspondence.

In an interview with TVNZ’s Q+A on Sunday after his resignation Coster said the first he heard of the allegation about emails being redirected after the IPCA report was released.

“I had absolutely no knowledge of that whatsoever. I can’t validate whether that was, in fact, a protocol that was in place, but what I can say is there’s no way in the world that agency employed staff in a minister’s office are able to prevent the minister or the minister’s staff from seeing email coming in on the minister’s email address.

“The role of the agency staff is to have emails given to them by the minister’s own staff to prepare responses for the minister through the agency… there’s just no way that police staff in Minister’s office could, could somehow intercept.”

Coster said he had seen a file note that was prepared by police in recent weeks, which said there was a conversation between the head of ministerial services – who is not in the minister’s office – and the director of Coster’s office about emails that came through in late 2023 and early 2024.

“It was ‘there are these emails. What do I do with them?’… the file note says the direction was send them through to Deputy Commissioner Tania Kura, who was overseeing the process.”

Coster did not know why the “retrospective note” was created.

“I imagine there will have been some concern across more than one Minister’s office about … where did all these emails go, and who saw them and and I assume that this paperwork was created in response to those conversations.”

Chief operating officer Andrea Conlan earlier said police could confirm a handwritten file note was made at the time of a discussion with the director of the office of the former commissioner on 17 January, 2024, regarding the processing of emails to the minister’s office.

Ministerial Services outlines how emails were handled

The manager of Ministerial Services was asked to speak with the minister’s office staff on 11 November, 2025, to outline how the emails sent to the office were handled.

“The handwritten file note was typed up by the manager after that conversation (and some detail added from memory). This was to make a digital record in parallel with the email the manager was asked to provide the minister’s office confirming the earlier conversation (and the process followed) in writing.

“Nobody asked for the file note to be prepared, but a confirmation email was requested by the minister’s office following the conversation on the morning of 11 November.

“Following the 17 January, 2024 conversation, at the request of the director of the office of the (former) commissioner, the manager of Ministerial Services provided hard copies of the emails to the (former) commissioner’s office.”

The manager also spoke to the staff member in the minister’s office to convey the director’s instruction.

“This was not included in the file note, but these actions corroborate what was documented in the manager’s original handwritten file note.”

Mitchell previously defended the police staff in his ministerial office, saying they were put in an “awful situation” by the protocol, which he was unaware of.

Following Coster’s interview, Mitchell said Coster’s claim that he was not aware about the system instituted to redirect emails was “unfathomable”.

“The protocol around the emails has been repeatedly verified by several police employees, who were given the instruction by Coster’s office.

“It came from his office and most senior direct reports, and as he already accepts, as commissioner, all things ultimately fell to his responsibility.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Politics live: Christopher Luxon faces colleagues as National’s caucus meets

Source: Radio New Zealand

Follow all the latest news with RNZ’s live blog above.

MPs are back at Parliament today for caucus meetings and the House back in session, after a weekend of speculation about Christopher Luxon’s leadership and economic uncertainty over the Iran war.

Follow all the latest news with RNZ’s live blog at the top of this page.

RNZ / Mark Papalii

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

‘It’s quite deceptive’: Complaint laid about the rise of property flippers

Source: Radio New Zealand

RNZ / Dom Thomas

One of the country’s most prominent buyers’ agencies has complained to the Real Estate Authority about a rise in “property flippers” making six-figures from unwitting vendors.

Earlier, Cotality told RNZ that the number of contemporaneous sales had lifted significantly last year after a sharp fall in 2023.

“There was a lift in these types of transactions last year, almost double 2024, and even more than what we saw through the Covid boom times,” head of research Nick Goodall said.

In a contemporaneous settlement, a property flipper often makes an offer with a long settlement period, and then finds another buyer to purchase the property the same day they have to settle, making money on the transaction.

iFindProperty co-founder Maree Tassell said there was noticeably more of the activity happening.

“It’s quite common that there are some deals out there where people are making over $100,000-plus on contemporaneous settlements, getting a property under contract. The poor old vendor, and even often the vendor’s agents will think ‘oh this is a real purchaser’. This is what’s really pissing me off.

“You’re getting these people come along, they get the property under contract, they act like they are the buyer. They tie a property up to say 20 days’ due diligence and then they’re immediately sending it out to their database and putting a big margin on it trying to onsell the property… they will pretend they’re bringing a builder through or pretend they’re bringing a valuer through and it will be a potential buyer. It’s quite deceptive to the vendors and quite deceptive sometimes to the agents.”

She said people saw it as a quick way to make money.

“And you get a whole lot of people creating mentoring services… they’re charging people money to come and learn how to make money in property.

“It’s all very sexy and it’s called no money down deals so they’re teaching people who know [not much] about property and don’t have the money to buy property just basically how to tie property contacts up and sell the contract. There’s no protection for the consumer, there’s no protection often for the vendor. They don’t know what’s happening.”

Property law expert Joanna Pidgeon said traders who were finding properties, buying them personally and then onselling were excluded from having to comply with the Real Estate Agents Act because they were self representing.

“Companies that sell property owned by the company directly to consumers are not required to hold a real estate licence issued by REA. However, a company that engages a contractor or sales agent who does not hold an active real estate licence to act as their representative on property sales may be engaged in unlicensed trading.

“People who buy directly from property traders who are not licensed do not have the same protections as when buying from a licensed real estate agent. This is particularly important as there is a conflict of interest when a trader is onselling directly. A purchaser should be seeking advice in relation to this, and should have their deposit held in a trust account pending the vendor becoming the registered owner of the property. We have seen some purchasers lose their deposits when traders have got into financial difficulty and the deposit has been released but the vendor unable to settle to enable the onsale.”

Tassell said she had meetings with both the Real Estate Institute and Real Estate Authority about the issue, which were positive.

The Real Estate Authority said it received a range of inquiries about property related activity and whether activity is within its regulatory scope. “We are not able to comment on any recent enquiries while our enquiries are ongoing, particularly out of fairness to the parties and to preserve the integrity of the process.”

Tassell said her business would make it clear if it were onselling, “We have a clause saying we’re licensed buyers’ agents. We’re not buying the property. We’re looking for someone to buy it. It’s total transparency with the vendor, it’s total transparency with the vendor’s agent. And then with our clients, the purchasers, it’s total transparency what they pay us. We’re not putting $150,000 between contracts and just laughing all the way to the bank.”

Sign up for Money with Susan Edmunds, a weekly newsletter covering all the things that affect how we make, spend and invest money.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Fatal Auckland fire not suspicious

Source: Radio New Zealand

The scene of the fatal fire. RNZ / FELIX WALTON

A fatal blaze in Auckland last week is not suspicious, police say.

Emergency services were called to a garage on fire on Tamaki Avenue in Ōtāhuhu last Wednesday night.

A person was found dead inside.

“Our thoughts are with the deceased’s family and friends at this sad time,” police said.

“The death will be referred to the coroner.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Robin Beets was killed in a dementia unit attack but his family don’t want the other patient charged

Source: Radio New Zealand

Robin Walter Beets, 84, died in November 2023. Supplied

The death of an elderly man at a dementia unit following an altercation with another patient was a “tragic outcome that was preceded by a sudden eruption of anger without a known cause or warning”, a coroner says.

Police decided not to charge the patient with manslaughter. The family of the man did not want the patient charged and said the “best outcome is to ensure this doesn’t happen again to other families”.

Coroner Ruth Thomas’ report into the death of Robin Walter Beets in November 2023 was released to RNZ.

The report said the 84-year-old was living in the Stokeswood Care Home dementia unit in Lower Hutt.

Nurses and caregivers said Beets was a “gentleman” and a “lovely guy”.

In August 2023 Beets was assessed as needing Dementia Level 3 secure residential care and placed in the dementia unit operated by BUPA Care Service.

The unit co-ordinator said Beets required full assistance with daily living, orientation and direction.

“She said he liked to keep himself busy, he had previously worked as an engineer and would try to fix things like the stereo at the dementia unit even when it was working fine. He would sometimes move furniture around, which would frustrate other residents who became triggered by the noise of the moving,” the coroner said.

Coroner Thomas’ report discusses another patient who was staying at the facility. Staff recorded the patient could become “triggered by loud noises at times”.

“The staff had a care plan in place to manage [the patient’s] behaviour with de-escalation techniques and medication as needed. The staff found this was effective as he was easy to calm down and re-direct.”

A medical note for the patient said his “unsettled and aggressive behaviour” on some afternoons was due to sundowning.

“Sundowning is a deterioration in cognitive function and occurs in the late afternoon or evening. [The patient’s] medication regime was adjusted, and this was helpful in reducing his agitation. Staff were aware of this behaviour and would redirect and distract [the patient].”

On the evening of 9 November, 2023, Beets was seated at a table with two other residents near a bookshelf. The other patient was sitting at a different table with other residents.

A nurse said she was walking along a corridor when she heard the emergency alarm went off, so she ran back to the dementia lounge.

She saw Beets lying on his back near the bookshelf and the other patient was “on his knees with Mr Beets”.

The patient was shouting at Beets and was pointing at him with his hand “like the gesture you use to tell a person off”.

A caregiver said she was looking at some medication alongside a colleague and could hear some residents talking as well as the sound of chairs moving behind her and the patient shouting.

“In her peripheral vision she saw [the patient] near Mr Beets’ table. They were both standing, facing each other and [the patient] was holding Mr Beets’ collar. Mr Beets stepped backwards away from [the patient] and fell onto the floor.”

She described seeing the patient kneeling next to Beets with his arm raised and his fist clenched.

“Mr Beets was screaming in pain and [the patient] was yelling.”

The caregiver ran over and told the patient to stop and helped him to stand up. Another staffer got the patient away from the area.

The caregiver then noticed the dining chair Beets had been sitting on was on the floor, and thought he may have tripped over it.

The other caregiver who was also looking at the medication reported seeing both men standing face to face by the bookshelf.

The patient was holding Beets’ shirt collar. She described the patient as holding his right arm up with a closed fist.

“She then saw Mr Beets take two to three steps backwards, trip over a dining chair that was behind him, and fall to the ground.” She also saw the patient fall to the ground.

Beets was eventually transferred to Hutt Hospital where he underwent hip surgery the following day. There were no complications from the surgery, however his health declined in the days afterwards and he developed aspiration pneumonia. Beets died on 20 November.

A falls investigation report, carried out by BUPA, recommended new registered nurses receive further education to increase their knowledge of the fall prevention management in the dementia unit. The shared learning lessons part of the review said the unit had a staff meeting about early detection and intervention of residents in an altercation and ensuring clear documentation of an event and management.

Police sought an expert opinion from a consultant psychiatrist as part of its investigation. The psychiatrist said the patient would be “entirely unable to understand the charge, nature, purpose or consequences of court proceedings, unable to instruct defence counsel, unable to enter a plea and unable to participate in a hearing”.

It was his opinion that the patient would be unfit to stand trial. Police decided not to charge the man with manslaughter. As part of the investigation, police spoke with Beets’ family who said they did not want anyone charged adding “the best outcome is to ensure this doesn’t happen again to other families, in Stokeswood, or any care facility.”

Coroner Thomas said Beets’ family had questioned the circumstances surrounding his fall to understand whether anything could have been done to prevent it.

A Coroners Court Clinical Advisor reviewed the evidence and said the incident was “very unfortunate but unpredictable and not preventable”.

“Although incidents like this can be assumed at some level to probably have some sort of trigger in the person’s mind, it is often impossible, even in retrospect, to identify what it was. I am of the view, based on the provided information, that the staff provided very good care for [the patient], and did everything in their power to prevent the assault.”

Coroner Thomas said her assessment of the evidence in the inquiry revealed a “tragic outcome that was preceded by a sudden eruption of anger without a known cause or warning”.

“The staff had been actively managing [the patient’s] behaviour in the unit, but tragically on this occasion with no warning of a change in [the patient’s] behaviour, and both staff momentarily facing away from where the incident started, there was not enough time for staff to pre-emptively intervene and redirect [the patient] before he had grabbed Mr Beets by his collar. This incident took the staff by surprise, was unpredictable and I do not find the staff could have done more to prevent this altercation and therefore the tragic consequences that followed.”

In a statement to RNZ, Beets’ family said he was a “much-loved” husband, father, Grandad and Poppa who was “very practical, mechanically capable and a friend to many in Petone”.

“He was a very caring man, had a great laugh and was always willing to help others.”

Beets was diagnosed with dementia formally in early 2021, and as he deteriorated the family made the decision to go into full-time care in August 2023.

“Dementia is a terrible disease for both the individual and their family. As is expressed in the report, we have never wanted the other party who also suffered from this disease to be charged or punished for this incident.

“What was important for us as a family was to see if there were lessons to be learnt which may prevent another family suffering a loss in the same way. We appreciate the thorough work done by both the Police and the Coroner, especially that the specific questions we asked were addressed within her report. We also note the internal review that the Care Facility undertook which resulted in additional training and support being put in place.”

A BUPA spokesperson said acknowledged the coroner’s findings and the conclusion that this incident was “unpredictable and surprising”.

“Our thoughts remain with Mr Beets’ family, and we recognise the distress this event caused them. Moments like this are profoundly sad for everyone involved, and we continue to extend our sincere sympathy to the family.”

Aged Care Association chief executive Tracey Martin said in a statement to RNZ the case highlighted a “broader and growing reality”.

“Aged residential care is supporting residents with increasingly complex behavioural and clinical needs, particularly within dementia care settings.

“Dementia units are caring for people with significant behavioural and psychological symptoms, often in environments that were not originally designed for the intensity of today’s care requirements. As the acuity of residents rises, so too does the need for workforce support, training, clinical backup, and appropriate funding settings.”

She said while the coroner had not made recommendations, the case reinforced the importance of “continued investment in dementia capability, staff training, and system settings that recognise the complexity of modern aged care”.

Detective Inspector John van den Heuvel said as New Zealand’s median age continued to rise, the number of people living with dementia was also expected to grow.

“While fatal incidents within dementia units remain rare, resident‑on‑resident assaults do occur from time to time that require Police investigation. This can be a difficult and sad situation to deal with for everyone involved.”

People living with dementia often experienced significant cognitive impairment, meaning they may not fully comprehend their actions or form the intent required to be held criminally responsible, he said.

“As a result, the evidential test for prosecution is frequently not met, and pursuing criminal charges is unlikely to be in the public interest. Police assess these matters carefully and in close consultation with medical specialists, care providers, and legal advisors. In cases involving a death the coroner is also consulted.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

How to talk to your children about conflict and war

Source: Radio New Zealand

It can be hard to avoid news about the conflict and war around the world, especially with images and updates regularly topping the news and circulating online.

Brad Morgan is the director of Emerging Minds, an Australian organisation which develops mental health policy, interventions and programmes, and leads the National Workforce Centre for Child Mental Health.

“You see it on public transport. We see it in shops. You see it at home. Obviously, for some children, it’s also in their pockets or at school,” Morgan tells Nine to Noon.

Our children are increasingly exposed to updates about wars and conflicts from all around the world with the 24/7 accessibility to the news.

Unsplash / Getty Images

Air NZ suspends earning guidance amid global jet fuel markets volatilty

Source: Radio New Zealand

Generic plane. Air New Zealand at Wellington airport. RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King

Air New Zealand has suspended its earning guidance amid what it calls unprecedented volatility in global jet fuel markets.

The airline expects a meaningful impact on its second half earnings.

After implementing initial fare changes, it says it may need to take further price action and adjust its network if the conflict leads to continued high jet fuel costs.

Air New Zealand shares had fallen nearly 8 percent on Monday.

Oil prices are up about 8 percent to US$99.90 a barrel, after climbing to a high of US$119.50 a barrel overnight, its biggest-ever absolute price jump in a single day.

Reuters reports that some jet fuel prices have doubled since the start of the conflict putting pressure on carriers already having to reroute to avoid the Middle East conflict and cater to thousands of stranded passengers trying to leave the region.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand