Page 1231

Across the Ditch: NZ Headlines + Meth Scourge + All Blacks V Wallabies Saturday

Across the Ditch: Australian radio FiveAA.com.au’s Peter Godfrey and EveningReport.nz’s Selwyn Manning deliver their weekly bulletin Across the Ditch. This week: Weather + Headlines IN-DEPTH: Peter and Selwyn take an in-depth look at how over 40% of homes tested for meth contamination tested positive. SPORT: Also, the All Blacks take on Australia’s Wallabies rugby team at Eden Park in Auckland. The Wallabies haven’t beaten the All Blacks at Eden Park since 1986, but this weekend Australia will be wanting to break that curse and also shatter the All Blacks’ hopes of extending their world record winning streak of 17 international tests. Across the Ditch broadcasts live weekly on Australia’s FiveAA.com.au and webcasts on EveningReport.nz LiveNews.co.nz and ForeignAffairs.co.nz.]]>

Legal case filed as oil giant exists NZ for Artic

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

An unprecedented legal case has been filed this week against the Norwegian government for allowing oil companies including state-owned Statoil to drill for new oil in the Arctic.

The legal case was filed by Nature and Youth, the largest environmentalist youth organisation in Norway and Greenpeace Nordic. Both agencies argue that Norway is violating the Paris Agreement and the people’s constitutional right to a healthy and safe environment for future generations.

The case comes only days after Statoil pulled the plug on its New Zealand operations in Northland, and just before a visit by Norway’s indigenous Sámi parliment, who are meeting with iwi around the country to discuss Statoil’s presence here.

‘Stiff resistance’

The Sámi visit follows a Māori delegation to Norway last year, who met with Sámi people and attended the annual Statoil shareholders meeting to put the owners on notice that their investment in Aotearoa would be met by stiff resistance.

Greenpeace New Zealand climate campaigner and lawyer, Kate Simcock, said the case could have implications around the world.

“With the success of the Urgenda climate case against the Dutch Government, and now this, we’re seeing that it’s possible for ordinary people and smart legal tactics to hold governments to account on their plans to tackle climate change.”

]]>

USP vice-chancellor ‘must step down’, says MP

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Opposition MP Mikaele Leawere is calling on an immediate inquiry into USP’s decision. Image: FijiOne

Fiji’s opposition is calling on the University of the South Pacific’s vice-chancellor to step down, after USP’s decision to de-register students who have outstanding fees.

Opposition MP Mika Leawere expressed his concern with the decision which comes just before students sit their final exams.

“Taxpayers of Fiji contribute towards Fiji being the biggest financial member state contributor of the University and this draconian policy lacks any humanity or wisdom given that Fiji and many students are still recovering from the devastation of TC Winston.

“While we accept that the University is an institution of higher education and is not a charitable organisation, surely an institution of academics can empathise with their students who are already stressed with exam preparations and now are further burdened with an inhumane policy that dashes all their hard work for the semester at the 11th hour.”

‘Unanimous decision’

In an interview with Fiji Broadcasting Corporation acting vice-chancellor, Professor Richard Coll, said the decision to de-register students who have not paid all fees in full was a unanimous decision by the USP Senate.

Coll said student’s debts are now very high and accumulating every year, and the University sees it critical that this is addressed.

FBC reported students have until Friday this week to pay outstanding fees.

]]>

‘Jakarta Conclusions’: action plan for Asian media

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Indonesian journalists in Jakarta wore masks on World Press Freedom Day on May 3, 2016, in protest of the ongoing media violations. Image: News.CN

Experts from Southeast Asian nations have identified key challenges facing media in their region. They propose three fundamental areas of action for civil society, governments and the media.

The expert 19-member group included researchers, media professionals and human rights defenders forming the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), namely Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam. Representatives from Timor Leste and Mongolia were also present.

‘Jakarta conclusions’

DW Akademie, an organisation that supports the development of international media, reported the experts agreed on a three-step action plan called the “Jakarta Conclusions” which is aimed to enhance the situation for media in Southeast Asia.

The plan will require the collective efforts of civil society, media organisations and governments.

Jakarta Conclusions Action Plan:

  1. Take steps to develop a special regional mechanism to improve the media environment based on existing international and regional models.
  2. Create a process to engage the large global Internet intermediaries to address issues of access, accountability, sustainability, and the impact these companies have on media and society.
  3. Promote programs to expand media and information literacy at a sufficient scale to have impact at the societal level

1. Develop a regional mechanism for Southeast Asia

DW Akademie’s report stated that Southeast Asia does not have a special rapporteur for freedom of expression – whereas Latin AmericaAfrica and Europe have active and independent representatives who advocate for information, expression and media rights.

Experts expressed that the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights has not pushed for this issue.

Therefore representatives from civil society organisations suggested establishing an informal mechanism in the absence of government support.

But others advocated to continue to push for an official mechanism, pointing out that Southeast Asia could learn from the Arab world which is currently seeking to establish a freedom of expression special rapporteur.

2. Engage the large global Internet intermediaries

DW Akademie reported companies such as Google and Facebook take a large share of online advertising revenue in Southeast Asia but do little to counter the spread of online hate speech, propaganda and disinformation.

Therefore experts suggested encouraging these platforms to develop a pricing system which differentiates between general information and quality journalism.

Maria Ressa, the former CNN lead investigative reporter in Asia said members need to work collectively.

“We need to come together and confront these and other companies with the situation in our region.”

3. Promote programs to expand media and information literacy

The growing importance of media users emphasised the importance of media and information literacy.

Hugo Maria Fernades of the Press Council of Timor Leste  said such programs should enable the population to “actively and consciously” use media.

]]>

Lifting of journo ban a ‘curious move’ says NZ reporter

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Fiji prime minister Frank Bainimarama is expected to visit New Zealand from October 19-23, 2016. Image: Pacific Scoop

New Zealand journalist Michael Field of Fairfax has said the announcement by the Fiji government to lift its ban on foreign journalists in the country is a “curious” move.

He told NewstalkZB that he has still not been properly advised.

“It’s all part of an interesting game that he [Bainimarama] is playing, because I have not been advised.”

“It’s a curious thing to do and it should be noted that the domestic media in Fiji is still governed by military decrees so I don’t know what it all means.”

TVNZ’s Barbara Dreaver has also been blacklisted from Fiji since 2008.

She has previously expressed in Asia Pacific Report that journalists should not be banned in any democratic country.

“The people of Fiji deserve to have their stories told no matter who they are or who they vote for.”

Usual manner

The Fiji government is said to have lifted the ban on foreign journalists reporting in the country as long as they have been accredited in the usual manner by the Department of Information.

The Fiji Times reported the announcement was made by prime minister Frank Bainimarama earlier this week who said the ban on foreign journalists was established because he believed they were not objective in their reporting.

“The government originally instituted these bans because it believed that some journalists had crossed the line from journalism to political advocacy and had inserted themselves into the domestic political debate.

“But the government reminds foreign journalists of their universal obligation to report events fairly and in a balanced manner.”

]]>

Across the Ditch: Headlines Roundup + Euthanasia Debate + Sport

Across the Ditch: Australian radio FiveAA.com.au’s Peter Godfrey and EveningReport.nz’s Selwyn Manning deliver their weekly bulletin Across the Ditch. This week Peter and Selwyn go deep on the euthanasia debate. New Zealand politicians are hearing verbal submissions on the pros and cons of euthanasia. But should we be cautious about letting politicians legislate on this very very very important issue? FIRST UP Weather comparison Currency comparison Headlines roundup ITEM ONE: Euthanasia – The NZ Parliament has begun hearing submissions on euthanasia, largely from people wishing to give a verbal rationale on whether politicians ought to consider making euthanasia legal in New Zealand. Political parties in New Zealand are warming to the idea of getting a bill before the house that would make it legal for people in New Zealand to receive assistance with ending their lives. For background, here is a link to an editorial I wrote on euthanasia. I have written editorials against euthanasia, basing my argument on investigative reporting I did in the 1990s when the then National led Government brought in (through stealth) exclusion criteria affecting those seeking life saving treatments like dialysis. The back then, doctors treating people suffering end stage renal failure were presented with criteria that excluded their patients from accessing renal dialysis treatment if they were blind, had a history of mental illness, intellectual disability, displayed antisocial behaviour, had a criminal conviction, were over 65 years of age. The government’s move to stop people getting this life saving treatment was largely fiscally motivated. The criteria was supposed to remain secret. I discovered the Minister had authorised it and had the government’s health finding authority present the criteria to doctors as an ethical framework through which they could ascertain what categories of people would be prevented from accessing dialysis. The reportage caused a political furore. Urgent Parliamentary debates followed… In the end the then Minister of Health Jenny Shipley (later prime minister) was forced to ditch the exclusion criteria policy and disestablish the Core Health Services Committee that she set up to drive such policies. At that time, the National Government was able to legally exclude people on this basis as it had passed a law that excluded government entities from having to work within the ‘constraints’ of the human rights act. Leaked official documents I obtained back then revealed how the Health Minister was about to roll out exclusion criteria for coronary care, oncology care, basically all areas of health care where it was considered a heavy fiscal burden on the State. On euthanasia… My argument is, that based on the experiences of reporting the exclusion criteria issue in the 1990s, my concern today is: euthanasia laws, while well meaning, could be used by future governments as a means of addressing fiscal pressures and a way to reduce the State’s continuing care cost-burdens. If the politicians really want to debate the merits of euthanasia, I say, first, let them answer this: As the baby boomer generation ages, at what point does the fiscal burden on the State become politically unsustainable? Here in New Zealand it does appear that point is getting closer. ITEM TWO Sport – While Australia’s Wallabies played themselves back toward respectability last weekend beating Argentina’s Pumas 31 – 21… Spare a thought for the poor ole Springboks. The All Blacks beat them in Durban 57 -15! The win notched up a rugby world record with the All Blacks having now won 17 international tests without any losses. Even the POMEs are saying this is the best international team ever to play the game, and Aussie rugby great Marc Ella says the Kiwis can’t be beaten when Australia turns out for a hiding at Auckland’s Eden Park on Saturday October 22. To lay it on thick, Australia hasn’t beaten New Zealand at rugby at Eden Park since 1983. That’s 33 years! Can you guys do it? Well, let’s wait and see. Don’t worry though, the Cricket season will soon be upon us :)]]>

Salvage Deal on the Table As TPPA Negotiators Prepare For December Meeting in Geneva

Source: Professor Jane Kelsey

Secrecy has returned to Trans Pacific Partnership negotiations with doubt that the current agreement will survive the United States presidential elections. And this week, it has emerged that some of the TPP membership nations will meet in Geneva in early December to nut out what can be salvaged prior to the inauguration of the newly elected US president.

[caption id="attachment_6181" align="alignleft" width="150"]Professor Jane Kelsey. Professor Jane Kelsey.[/caption]

According to New Zealand-based University of Auckland law expert and opponent of the TPP deal, Professor Jane Kelsey “while attention focuses on the fate of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) many of its key elements have been flipped across to the equally secretive negotiations in Geneva for the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA)”.

“Some parts of TiSA go even further,” according to professor Kelsey.

Trade Ministers from the 23 negotiating parties, including the US, EU, Japan, Australia and New Zealand, plan to meet in Geneva on 5-6 December when they hope to wind up a deal that has remained largely under the radar.

‘I was in Geneva last month and met with a number of government delegations. They confirmed that TiSA is intended as a “21st century” deal for transnational corporations. The new focus is on e-services, which will benefit the digital behemoths like Google, Amazon and Uber’, Professor Kelsey said.

‘Their goal, as with TPPA, is to put handcuffs on future governments’ right to regulate. Perhaps the most frightening would pre-empt governments from regulating so-called “new services”, including as yet unknown new technologies.’    

‘Equally worrying, given this country’s litany of failed deregulation, privatisation and free market experiments in services, is the idea that treatment of foreign firms should never be less liberal than now (‘standstill’) and any future liberalisation should be locked in automatically (“ratchet).’

As with the TPPA information on TiSA relies largely on a steady stream of leaks posted on Wikileaks and more recently by Greenpeace on energy services.

‘Trade Minister Todd McClay made much of his plan to be much more open about future negotiations, but he has retreated further down the rabbit hole’, according to Professor Kelsey.

The EU, Norway, Switzerland and some others have published what they are offering the other countries, as was done in earlier WTO negotiations on services – including by New Zealand.

McClay has refused to do the same, citing the need to protect future negotiations. Professor Kelsey described that as ‘spurious nonsense designed to prevent in-depth scrutiny of what New Zealand is up to before we are presented with another done deal.’ 

‘TiSA could have more direct impacts on New Zealand’s future policy space than the TPPA. We know, for example, New Zealand has been pushing hard to get other countries to lock open their doors to private education providers. I assume they are promising to do the same. The non-discrimination rule may see proposed legislation to guarantee public subsidies to private providers, including foreign education firms, locked in without the possibility of change.’

Professor Kelsey will give a media briefing on TiSA and latest developments on the TPPA in the US and other countries on Wednesday October 12, at 10.30, Level 14, Bowen House, 70/84 Lambton Quay.

]]>

Across the Ditch: Helen Clark Ends UNSG Campaign + Big Storm Looms + All Blacks

Across the Ditch: Australian radio FiveAA.com.au’s Peter Godfrey and EveningReport.nz’s Selwyn Manning deliver their weekly bulletin Across the Ditch. This week Peter and Selwyn discuss how former New Zealand prime minister Helen Clark’s bid has ended for the UN secretary general position. Also, a BIG storm looms for NZ, and also All Black Aaron Smith has been sent back to New Zealand after a scandal emerged. FIRST UP: Weather comparison Currency comparison Headlines roundup ITEM ONE: Former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark’s bid for the United Nations secretary general job has concluded after the UN security council’s permanent five members exercised their votes over night. It is believed the USA, Russia, and France gave Clark the red card. Helen Clark has congratulated winner Portugal’s former prime minister and former head of the UN’s refugee body, Antonio Guterres. Guterres came through the security council members vote with a green-light, meaning he was well ahead of all other contenders. ITEM TWO: Weather – New Zealand Civil Defence has issued a weather warning for Thursday and Friday, forecasting gales, lighting, flooding, and possible tornadoes threatening the North Island and upper South Island. The storm is approaching only days after the country had a good drenching from the storm that hit South Australia so hard last week, knocking out your power. By the time it crossed the ditch, the sting in the storm had eased, but the ground in NZ is still saturated, and with another significant storm looming, the expectation is that flooding and slips will occur. ITEM THREE: Sport – With Aussie’s Wallabies off to Argentina to play the Pumas this weekend, the All Blacks head to Durban to take on the Springboks on their home soil. And, key All Black halfback Aaron Smith is heading home from South Africa after information emerged that he and his girlfriend entered a disabled persons public toilet at Christchurch Airport. The All Black senior management spoke to Smith and instructed that he be sent home before the All Blacks V Springbok game scheduled for this Sunday.]]>

EDITORIAL: Be Aware and Beware of What You Demand – A Case Against State-Backed Euthanasia

Selwyn Manning, editor - EveningReport.nz

Editorial by Selwyn Manning – Be Aware and Beware of What You Demand – A Case Against State-Backed Euthanasia

Proposition: Do Governments legislate in our interest?
Selwyn Manning, editor of EveningReport.nz.

In my editorial titled: Be Aware and Beware of What You Demand – A Case Against State-Backed Euthanasia, I reflect back to the mid-1990s to an investigation I wrote that exposed how the government was to enforce exclusion criteria designed to prevent people from accessing life-saving but expensive treatments. If you were blind, intellectually disabled, had a history of mental illness, anti-social behaviour, a criminal conviction – you would be excluded from having renal dialysis. The experience of reporting this confirmed my resolve against state-backed-euthanasia. Here’s why…

Back in the mid 1990s Jenny Shipley (then Minister of Health in the Bolger National Government) established a governmental body called the Core Health Services Committee (CHSC) which was chaired by former broadcaster Sharon Crosbie. 

The CHSC was known to exist, but no one paid much attention to it, and also getting information out of it was problematic as it would cite commercial confidentiality as a reason for withholding information. So a lot of its work went under the radar.

Back then, National had created a commercial model that replaced health boards with Regional Funding Authorities (RHAs) and hospitals became Crown Health Enterprises. It wasn’t until 2000, that the new Helen Clark-led Labour-Alliance Government disestablished the RHAs and CHEs and reestablished publicly elected health boards, and, hospitals became public hospitals once again. 

In 1994-95 Jenny Shipley was Minister of Health. She later became the first woman prime minister of New Zealand (unelected). Helen Clark became the first woman elected by popular vote to become prime minister of New Zealand.
In 1994-95 Jenny Shipley was Minister of Health. She later became the first woman prime minister of New Zealand (unelected). Helen Clark became the first woman elected by popular vote to become prime minister of New Zealand.

But back in the early to mid-1990s the Core Health Services Committee was accountable directly to the Minister of Health, Jenny Shipley, and was tasked with creating health funding frameworks, protocols, criteria that the then RHAs would rely upon when deciding what health services the government would pay Crown Health Enterprises (CHEs) for – when providing health ‘services’ to ‘clients’ (patients).

The Core Health Services Committee was tasked to evaluate a way of reducing the cost-burden on the Government for health services and come up with a set of criteria that CHEs and doctors would have to abide by when deciding which ‘clients’ (patients) would get treatment and, importantly, who would not.

A Decision was made to Exclude Patients from Life-Saving Treatment

In August 1994, I became aware that the Core Health Services Committee had been evaluating the most costly procedures, including renal dialysis treatment for people with end-stage renal failure. I was told by sources that the CHSC had drafted a document that included a framework for how expensive treatments would be handled, and that the Minister of Health had approved the plan.

Generally, there are two types of criteria:

  • inclusion – (meaning patients that met certain criteria would be eligible for treatment)
  • exclusion – (meaning those that could be labeled as possessing or exhibiting specific criteria would exclude then from being offered treatment.

In August 1994, I was leaked documents that displayed how the Minister had approved the CHSC protocols that used exclusion criteria and that the protocols had been presented to doctors and the exclusion criteria enforced.

The Exclusion Criteria

What this meant was people who presented with end stage renal failure, and who required dialysis to stay alive, would be excluded from getting this life-saving treatment if they were deemed:

  • to be blind
  • to have an intellectual disability
  • had a history of mental illness
  • exhibited or expressed anti-social behaviour
  • had a history of imprisonment
  • had an unrelated health condition that may cause complications
  • were over the age of 65-years…

The set of exclusion criteria continued on. 

Without a public debate having ensured, CHE doctors were required to administer the changes and CHEs were required to report back to the RHAs with details on how the exclusion criteria was being applied.

Up until then, doctors and clinicians had decided on whether a patient would get dialysis treatment – the assessment was based on what health benefits a patient could expect, and were not required to consider exclusion criteria that were determined by the State.

The doctors silently rebelled and, as a journalist, as I mentioned above, I was leaked the CHSC protocols and exclusion criteria documents.

I sought a legal view from the Human Rights Commission, whose legal team suggested the criteria would be illegal under the act should it be brought into force by any other body excluding a government entity.

At that time, the Government had passed a human rights act but had excluded government entities (at that time) from having to act within that law.

Once We Published a Furore was Ignited

The day the investigation was published, a political furore ensued. The article was tabled in Parliament (in those days a news article could be tabled before The House) and Labour’s then health spokesperson, Lianne Dalziel, raised it during Parliament’s question time (Question number 7 if I remember right). And, once question time concluded, the issue was the focus of an urgent debate.

Former Prime Minister of New Zealand, David Lange.
Former Prime Minister of New Zealand, David Lange.

During the debate, former prime minister David Lange delivered a stinging and passionate attack on the National Government’s ethics and morals. Lange said (ref. http://www.vdig.net/hansard/archive.jsp?y=1994&m=09&d=01&o=44&p=56):

Look at this thing in south Auckland. There was an extraordinary defence by the Minister—the determining factor is one’s condition. I have to tell members that those key ethical principles are not determined by one’s condition, and they are not determined by one’s state; they are determined by one’s status.

David Lange continued: insisting that the criterial that the Minister of Health had approved and defended was akin to the State standing on the dialysis pipe to prevent the flow of this life-saving treatment from reaching the patient.

He continued: “If one is intellectually handicapped, the drip goes off. If one is intellectually handicapped, one does not get what is called end-stage renal treatment, and that means one dies. They (the Government) are very good at euphemisms—“modernisation”. The word “euthanasia” does not come into it; it is “determination of end-stage renal treatment”.”

And Lange summarised: “Let us come back to the crude reality of it. Value judgments are being made about people’s lives, and those value judgments will be affected by whether they are people of influence, standing, or status. If they are psychiatrically disturbed or if they are intellectually disabled, the tap is turned off; they stand on the air pipe, and they talk about it in terms of core ethical commitments. I absolutely repudiate that.”

The Government Responded

The Minister Jenny Shipley replied: The core health services committee has made some valuable recommendations about the areas on which attention should be focused. The core services committee has actually begun to assist this country to grapple with some of the most difficult ethical issues that are before us.”

She continued: “I am fascinated that some members of the Opposition are dismissive of our actually having the courage to address ethical questions in the field of medicine. It is true that every country in the world is in a similar position to us. There are issues that we know have to be spoken about, and what happens?

“In Parliament today Opposition members could not resist the temptation of picking up a piece of information, which they know is a gerrymandered interpretation of the core services committee discussion document, and politicising it. People in need of renal failure treatment actually do need to be able to be assessed and treated on a clinical basis. The core services committee raises some extremely important questions that allow clinical judgments to be made,” Jenny Shipley said.

Then, Exclusion Criteria Was Then Abandoned

Through the next month I followed up with articles revealing how the Core Health Services Committee and the Minister had agreed upon exclusion criteria for other life-saving treatments including coronary care and oncology care health services. The impact, should it have been fully rolled out, would have been considerable.

Within a month or two, the Core Health Services Committee criteria had been withdrawn from use, and the CHSC itself was later disestablished – doctors were again able to decide who should and should not get treatment based on a patient’s benefit and outcome.

From then on, when I would contact the Minister of Health’s office for comment on issues, I would be referred to as Goebbels (which I ignored apart from noting the irony).

The Government’s Retaliation

South Auckland man, James Mckeown.
South Auckland man, James Mckeown.

Shortly after around March 1995, the Minister of Health Shipley stood staunch arguing that a south Auckland man who became the human face of her policy called James McKeown ought not receive dialysis treatment. 

Shipley went on TVNZ’s Holmes Show arguing why the man ought to be left to die from his condition. 

She identified clinical reasons for her argument. South Auckland Health’s then CEO, Dr Lester Levy, returned from holiday to stand between the minister and his hospital’s patient – Levy ordered that James receive dialysis. 

In Parliament (ref. http://www.vdig.net/hansard/content.jsp?id=45370Lianne Dalziel asked: “Has the Minister received any advice on whether the statements made on television were a breach of patient confidentiality, and does she intend to resign should they be a breach of the Privacy Act?”

The Minister Jenny Shipley replied: “As I have said, this matter is before the Privacy Commissioner now. The issue of whether Mr McKeown, by disclosing a significant amount of his personal circumstance but not the complete story, forwent his right to privilege in the first place is an important matter that the Privacy Commissioner will rule on during the consideration of the three complaints that are before him.”

It was a clear case of the State’s Minister insisting and commanding her view over an ill and humble man from Otara.

The Privacy Commissioner did indeed issue a ruling. Shipley was found to have breached James McKeown’ privacy and was forced to make an apology.  She did so.

A year later I revisited James and asked how his extended life had been: “It’s great he said, I enjoy my days, I have a flutter on the races, I’m happy.” A year and a half after Shipley had argued that his treatment ought to stop, James slipped away feeling that his doctors at least valued his life.

Prologue: The whole experience confirmed my resolve that we as a country’s peoples should never allow the State (irrespective of what party is in power) to interfere, nor legislate, against a born human being’s moral right to life and ethical right to access life-saving treatments.

Be Aware and Beware of What You Demand.

Keith Rankin’s Chart for this Month: Balance of Payments

]]>

Analysis by Keith Rankin.

The current account of the balance of payments is a measure of a country’s level of financial imbalance. For the world as a whole, the current account balance is always zero. A current account deficit in a particular country is neither bad nor good; it’s simply a measure of that country’s spending in excess of its income.

New Zealand has had current account deficits (green line) every year since 1974. It means that it has had financial account surpluses (red line; strictly ‘financial/capital account’ surpluses) every year since 1974.

By definition, for any country the current+financial+capital account balances must add to zero at all times. (The capital account is usually very small compared to the others – excepting times of large international insurance payouts, such as after the Christchurch earthquakes that began in 2010.) Essentially the current and financial accounts are mirror images.

The unstated assumption of most economic and financial analysts is that the current account balance is ‘autonomous’, meaning it is determined by our spending and earning behaviour, and that the financial account is accommodating, meaning that we resolve spending excesses through a mix of foreign borrowing and foreign asset sales (this mix is the ‘financial account’); and that if we did not have spending excesses then we would neither need to borrow from foreigners, nor sell assets to them. Through this understanding, an inability to finance an autonomous deficit would result in a depreciation of the New Zealand dollar (exchange rate).

The orthodox story is nonsense. Since 1985, current account deficits have accompanied significant appreciations of the New Zealand exchange rate. The principal driver of these data has been the financial account. Much more foreign finance has flowed into New Zealand than our much maligned spending habits would justify. The result has been a general pattern of currency appreciation, and accommodation through the current account.

For the most part – at least since financial liberalisation in 1985 – the current account deficits (spending excesses, if you will) have been induced by currency appreciations; appreciations which themselves resulted mainly from foreigners’ attraction to New Zealand as an ‘investment’ destination.

In the 1970s the orthodox story held. When export prices were very high in 1972 and 1973 then New Zealand ran current account surpluses. When import prices were very high from 1974 then New Zealand ran current account deficits. Deficits increased in the early 1980s when New Zealand Inc. actively borrowed in order to fund large-scale investment projects (‘Think Big’) designed to reduce imports in the long-run.

From 1985 – especially in the mid-1980s, mid-1990s, mid-2000s, and mid 2010s – foreign money flowing into New Zealand appreciated the currency as it flowed into assets’ markets. This appreciation (a ‘price signal’) induced import-led consumption; shown in the chart as the larger swings of the current account balance. The cause of the foreign financial inflows was a mix of savings’ gluts (the foreign push factor) and needlessly high interest rate settings in New Zealand (the domestic pull factor).

In the most recent years, the ‘unresolved’ data represents the largely unmeasured financial inflow that mirrors the measured current account deficits. The numbers are lower than a decade earlier mainly because of lower interest rates reducing the debt-servicing component of the current account balance. To counter any complacency about this, however, the indebtedness to the rest of the world implicit in these data becomes more problematic in a coming world of deflation and recession.

If every country tried – with the determination of those in Europe and Asia – to run current account surpluses (with the green line above the zero line and the red line below the zero line), then the capitalist world economy would quickly collapse. A systemic failure. We remind ourselves that every current account surplus in one country must be offset by a deficit in another, by definition, no matter how hard all try to run surpluses. It’s the Anglo and Latin and African countries that presently keep the world economy afloat, by being willing (if not happy) to run current account deficits.

]]>

Across the Ditch: SA Power Outage + Auckland Outage Revisited + Auckland Election Quirks

Across the Ditch: Australian radio FiveAA’s Peter Godfrey and New Zealand’s EveningReport editor Selwyn Manning deliver their weekly news bulletin Across the Ditch. This week Peter and Selwyn discuss South Australia’s power outage and recall how Auckland was without power for five weeks way back in 1998. Also was the weather and a headlines roundup. PLUS AUCKLAND MAYORAL ELECTIONS TURN OUTRAGEOUS: Kiwis get to vote for their preferred mayoral candidates and councillors over the next week as the local government campaigning nears its end. In Auckland, the expectation is former Minister of Foreign Affairs, of Trade, of Justice, of Defence, of Housing… … Phil Goff will poll well, with National’s preferred candidate Vic Crohn nipping at his heals. The Auckland campaign has also had its storage and bizarre moments especially this week while some of the lower polling candidates gathered to debate policy at Auckland University students’ association bar, Shadows. One candidate objected to the presence of another who had recently pulled out of the race. Next thing the audience knew, pushing and shouting erupted. It took the sane and persuasive talents of 23 year old candidate Chloe Swarbrick to intervene and cool the older heads down. She said she wasn’t worried about her own safety – which makes sense as she is quite an achiever in martial arts.Her policies are impressive too and she looks likely to be the favourite with younger voters and quite probably a political force in the future. Across the Ditch broadcasts live on Australia’s FiveAA.com.au and webcasts on EveningReport.nz and LiveNews.co.nz and ForeignAffairs.co.nz.]]>

Across the Ditch: NZ PM’s Big UN Splash + All Black Coach Wants North V South Hemisphere Champs

Across the Ditch: Australian radio FiveAA.com.au’s Peter Godfrey and EveningReport.nz’s Selwyn Manning deliver their weekly bulletin, Across the Ditch. This week: Weather comparison; NZ headlines; In depth: New Zealand’s Prime Minister has just concluded charing the United Nations Security Council and delivering a speech to the UN General Assembly. Sport: The All Black coach Steve Hansen wants the winner of the Six Nations Rugby champs in the Northern Hemisphere to play the winner of the Southern Hemisphere’s Rugby Championship competition. He says if that became an annual event it would certainly inject zest into the game at an international level. Across the Ditch broadcasts live weekly on Australia radio’s FiveAA.com.au and webcasts on EveningReport.nz and LiveNews.co.nz and ForeignAffairs.co.nz.]]>

Sweeney Todd A Horror Story Then and Now – Not Quite A Gonzo Review

Selwyn Manning, editor – EveningReport.nz

Review by Selwyn Manning

A ghastly tale of horror and intrigue looms for Wellington and Christchurch theatre-goers as New Zealand Opera sharpens its knives before its Auckland consumers – but beware, this story of Sweeney Todd may compel you to think.

Sweeney Todd is one awful story. And the tale is retold so well by this rendition of Stephen Sondheim’s musical horror, that at times you can almost smell it, how rotten Victorian London was. But is its power to compel dread found in the mirror this story presents?

Introduction to Sweeney:

Teddy Tahu Rhodes as Sweeney Todd, NZ Opera, Civic Theatre, Auckland, New Zealand, Thursday, September 15, 2016. Photo: David Rowland / One-Image.com
Teddy Tahu Rhodes as Sweeney Todd, NZ Opera, Civic Theatre, Auckland, New Zealand, Thursday, September 15, 2016. Photo: David Rowland / One-Image.com

Many of you will be familiar with the story: how Sweeney Todd was once happy and married to a delightful and true wife, how the couple were blessed by a loved and loving daughter, how a corrupt judge coveted their world, how his class and power was a privilege of his time, how the ugliness of obsession became compulsion, how he convicted Sweeney on a trumped up charge, sentenced him to life as a prisoner of mother England to be served within the penal colony of Australia, and then when the beauty within the Todd family turned vulnerable the judge set out to devour all of that which was left of Sweeney Todd’s world.

Some fifteen years later, Sweeney Todd escapes, returns to England and seeks revenge against those who destroyed what he loved. In a way it’s a brilliant story, the ghastly deeds committed by Sweeney and Mrs Lovett mask the true monster of class and inequality, the abandonment of meritocracy, the privileged’s indifference and consequential loathing for those cast below it.

Indeed, Sondheim’s story transports us to an earlier time to when Victorian England was rotten to the core. Such tales, when performed well, transport us not only to another time, but conjure up the opportunity to compare their lot to ours. Often, we are delighted to realise how far we have come culturally. But then, as all forms of good art do, especially when performed as superbly as New Zealand Opera is renowned, we find ourselves challenged by our own Contemporarianism.

Antoinette Halloran and Teddy Tahu Rhodes in Sweeney Todd, NZ Opera, Civic Theatre, Auckland, New Zealand, Thursday, September 15, 2016. Photo: David Rowland / One-Image.com
Antoinette Halloran and Teddy Tahu Rhodes in Sweeney Todd, NZ Opera, Civic Theatre, Auckland, New Zealand, Thursday, September 15, 2016. Photo: David Rowland / One-Image.com

Prelude To Sweeney – Masterclass: On preparing to attend this opera, I chose to wear tidy but casual pants. I donned a nice shirt rather than white shirt-black tie attire, and the jacket was almost unworn but was perhaps more suited to the cool weather outside than the Civic’s special magic.

Perhaps, in hindsight, I should confess, it was a little test. Some opera-goers are notorious for being a tad snobby, and Sweeney Todd was too rich to resist.

Were Auckland’s elite happy that New Zealand Opera was performing this Sondheim ‘musical’ only to risk broadening the audience demographic?

We had chosen not to enter via the Civic’s red carpet, but rather through the right-hand side entrance.

We made for the booking office and were greeted wonderfully as always by New Zealand Opera’s staff.

With tickets in hand and having been presented with a fabulously produced and written programme, we sought not to mingle but made for the theatre’s stalls.

The ushers were delightful in guiding us to our row, then our seats. We settled in, relaxed, gazed upward and about as we always do when inside the marvelous Civic theatre.

We politely stood up, as is the custom, to let others squeeze passed as allocated seats were sought.

Then, a dreadful moment presented as one very finely suited man of considerable height and an air of boardroom elegance squeezed passed to loom above us.

Before realising we were perhaps considered casts of a lesser God, the man paused time to insist, in his patiently expressed but obviously refined vowels, that we were sitting in his seats! “Are you sure,” I replied intoning a suggestion rather than question. “Positive,” he retorted.

As I traversed my mind to consider the scale of probabilities, he beat me to it and snapped: “Show me your tickets!”

I reached for my pocket electing to annoy by deploying the Union tactic of a ‘go slow’.

But once the evidence was presented I am sad to report that on inspection, it was proven that the ‘person’ who was to become the focus of my societal-comparative-analysis was indeed correct.

We had been ushered to the wrong row, the wrong seats, and I had failed to check the bloody tickets.

Needless to say dejection set in before ejection was sought and shamefully it became our lot to squeeze passed the polite-and-the-tolerant and search out our seats with haste before the Civic’s magical shooting star heralded our journey back to acceptability to another time and place. And transported we were.

The Resurrection and the Performance:

Cast of Sweeney Todd, NZ Opera, Civic Theatre, Auckland, New Zealand, Thursday, September 15, 2016. Photo: David Rowland / One-Image.com
Cast of Sweeney Todd, NZ Opera, Civic Theatre, Auckland, New Zealand, Thursday, September 15, 2016. Photo: David Rowland / One-Image.com

Within seconds of the superb Auckland Philharmonia’s conductor Benjamin Northey instructing his organist to bellow out a most agonising sequence of chords, two things came to mind: Vincent Price, and, how as children, one of my brothers and I used to nick the keys to the church next door, sit on the organ stool, pump the treadle while depressing the lowest note that old Gherty could muster.

There rumbling out a diabolical racket, we would smart with devilish grin knowing our mother wouldn’t be too far away to save the community from the horror story score we had conducted.

From the first note, I had one foot in Sweeney Todd present and the other in a past which seems too long ago. Director Stuart Maunder AM has achieved something special here. He has ensured his cast performs to their strengths. And it works.

Teddy Tahu Rhodes, with respect to you, from the moment you appeared as a demon among the light you became our Sweeney Todd.

Rhodes’ voice… people if you want to hear what a real baritone sounds like then you have to see and hear this guy perform this role.

He makes Caiaphas in JC Superstar sound like a genteel grandfather.

When Rhodes speaks as Sweeney, all before him become captors with a compulsion to listen. And thank you for that, as Sweeney’s message is powerful. In performance, voice has many elements where the unspoken whispers to the inner you.

Could it be that Sweeney Todd compels us to consider what kind of character in truth we have become?

It is true that Rhodes channels a horror that lurks within Sweeney, and within this character there is time and space to pause, to consider, to realise cause and effect.

Rhodes’ strength plants Sweeney Todd’s feet firmly on the ground, which choreographs well opposite soprano Antoinette Halloran who is cast as his offsider Mrs Lovett. Halloran is the yang of his yin (or considering the characters, is it the other way around).

In any case, Halloran is a master of comic timing and centre-stage presence. And she has to be to make this production of Sweeney Todd work.

It is simply due to a well-learned and earned talent that by degrees she allows her audience to sense that perhaps Mrs Lovett’s beguiling charm is but a cloak that conceals a duality – an oscillation between hope and construct, an intention caught between love and greed that morphs into a ghastly heart.

Helen Medlyn as the Beggar Woman in Sweeney Todd, NZ Opera, Civic Theatre, Auckland, New Zealand, Thursday, September 15, 2016. Photo: David Rowland / One-Image.com
Helen Medlyn as the Beggar Woman in Sweeney Todd, NZ Opera, Civic Theatre, Auckland, New Zealand, Thursday, September 15, 2016. Photo: David Rowland / One-Image.com

The story has its diversions. The plight of the young potential lovers, Johanna and Anthony Hope (performed superbly by Amelia Berry and James Benjamin Rodgers) is vital so as to accentuate a corruption manifest in the evil Judge Turpin (Phillip Rhodes), the horribly sycophantic Beadle Bamford (Andrew Glover), the tragedy that becomes Tobias Ragg (performed by the marvelous Joel Granger), and the hilarity of arch-crook Pirelli (performed by Robert Tucker).

Another special mention: it pays to pay attention to the Beggar Woman (so wonderfully performed by Helen Medlyn) for she holds the key to a very clever flick of the knife.

Once again production designer Roger Kirk has created a marvelous set that anchors, transforms and transports, and yes that summary includes that dreadful barber’s chair.

Prologue to Sweeney: On exiting the Civic, my man was there standing centre-stage upon the red carpet. He had chosen not to exit but rather juxtapositioned his back to the entrance (perhaps a barrier to the hordes outside).

Again he towered above all others and sought to chat, to mingle, and again we squeezed passed with thought. The freshness of pre-equinox air greeted us, the vibe on the street was joyous. Theatre-goers were well pleased with Sweeney Todd.

Lovers lined up to share ice-creams near a shop where Royal Dalton was once sold.

On the south-side of Queen Street I felt delighted to realise the decrepit Kerridge Odeon buildings had been demolished before noticing a man to my left of prime working age and inclination sat on a blanket holding a cardboard sign that read: “Can you help me please.”

He, like some of the characters in Sweeney Todd, clearly slept rough. But his story was reality not fiction while in truth he shared a commonality as a consequence of indifference, class and inequality.

Another rested his back against a Queen Street shop wall, perhaps to take timeout from begging. And my partner said to me (or to herself): “I must always remember to bring along some cash.”

We headed for the Civic Car-park, where at the Town Hall entrance, there exposed to wind and rain, another man lay wrapped up in a blanket and prepared snuggle down to sleep off the cold.

We got in our car, exited the car-park, accelerated up Greys Avenue, turned left into Pitt Street, and worked our way passed a young man who lay amid the traffic flowing passed the corner of Karangahape Road.

Help was at hand, a group of people had placed him in the recovery position, held his hand and awaited an ambulance’s arrival.

Then, Kingsland-bound, we drove passed where Dick Smith’s used to be, and noticed a slight teenager dressed in the lightest of summertime cloth preparing to earn herself a living for the night, and I thought of how on one-late-Friday-night, at the age of thirteen years four months, Aaron Williams and I shared a half dozen bottles of beer beneath the Southmall railway bridge in Manurewa and waited for the last train to pass.

I thought then of how we didn’t realise we had our lifetimes ahead of us. And it took some four days before I could write this review. Bravo New Zealand Opera, and thank you all especially Stephen Sondheim for Sweeney Todd – for while he became the protagonist for a terrible horror (yes his actions were chosen by the monster of whom he had become) Sweeney was merely a mask to disguise what a society and culture had created.

What: New Zealand Opera.

Performance: Sweeney Todd – the demon barber of Fleet Street.

Auckland dates: September 17, 18, 21, Friday 23, and Saturday 24.

Wellington dates: September 30, October 1, 2, 4, and 5.

Christchurch: October 12, 13, 14, 15 (two performances). To discover more and purchase tickets, see: NZOpera.com.

Amelia Berry and James Benjamin Rodgers in Sweeney Todd, NZ Opera, Civic Theatre, Auckland, New Zealand, Thursday, September 15, 2016. Photo: David Rowland / One-Image.comAmelia Berry and James Benjamin Rodgers in Sweeney Todd, NZ Opera, Civic Theatre, Auckland, New Zealand, Thursday, September 15, 2016. Photo: David Rowland / One-Image.com

Philippines president’s ‘hit man’ allegations spur renewed calls for killings probe

]]>

Report by David Robie. This article was first published on Café Pacific

Time magazine and Singapore Sunday Times reports on Philippines ‘killing fields’. Image: David Robie

By DAVID ROBIE

MOUNTING calls for the Philippines president to be investigated over the allegations of human rights violations deepened over the weekend with revelations by a confessed hit man that at least 1000 extrajudicial killings had been ordered when the president was mayor of the southern city of Davao. 

Fresh reports featuring the allegations were included in a cover story in the latest Time magazine, the Singapore Sunday Times and a new inquiry by the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism into the so-called “Davao Death Squad”.

It is only 80 days since President Rodrigo Duterte was sworn into office, and the PCIJ reports that he now “commands an armed contingent that is a hundred times bigger than it was in Davao, and his ‘enemy’ a thousand times more numerous”.

More than 3000 people have reportedly been killed so far in the so-called Project Tokhang – or “Double barrel” –  war on drugs. The president has also called for a six-month extension on his policy, claiming that the drugs business is largely “operated by people in government”.

Time magazine branded its report the “killing season” in the Philippines with a subheading of “Inside President Rodrigo Duterte’s war on drugs”.

The Sunday Times correspondent in Manila, Raul Dancel, reported on some of the victims of the Davao killings, including a 62-year-old mother who lost four of her sons to the assassins.

‘Forged in blood’
The report was headlined “A peace that was forged in blood”.

Self-confessed hit man Edgar Matobato, now 57, told a Philippines Senate inquiry last week that he and other members of the so-called Davao Death Squad had killed some 1000 people in Davao City on the island of Mindanao on the orders of Duterte between 1998 and 2013.

Duterte was mayor of Davao for two decades and now his daughter Sara is the mayor there.

The PCIJ reported in its inquiry that Duterte’s deputies have denied Matobato’s allegations, with Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II branding these claims as “old lies”. However, the president himself has not responded so far although he has made no secret in the past about his links with the death squads while denying direct responsibility.

The president’s chief legal counsel, Salvador Panelo, reportedly said he saw no reason for the President to respond to a “perjured witness”, adding that the Senate session was “not a hearing on extrajudicial killing, it was a case of extrajudicial lying”.

He said: “No amount of black propaganda, no amount of sinister ploy or plan will stop the President from his relentless campaign against the drug menace and terrorism.”

In one television programme during the presidential election campaign, he declared: “I am the death squad? True. That’s true.” But he later shrugged this off as merely “teasing”.

Davao killings
As PCIJ says, “there is no denying that Duterte’s reign in Davao City had been marked by numerous extrajudicial killings, with Davao media attributing at least 150 deaths there from 1995 to 2001 alone to the DDS [Davao Death Squad] and then Mayor Duterte’s war against drugs”.

According to PCIJ’s research via police and judicial records, the president’s “expanded war” has resulted in a death toll that is “10 times higher within a much shorter period; an average of 38 persons killed a day, or over 3200 in the last 80 days”.

The presidential “hit man” allegations in the Philippines national press. Photo: David Robie
 Matobato’s testimony before the Senate inquiry named Senator Leila de Lima as being on the target list while she had been chair of the Philippines’ Commission on Human Rights. (De Lima herself is also at the centre of allegations in a separate Congress inquiry opening this week).

Matobato said he and others in the death squad had been waiting to ambush De Lima in 2009 but she had not ventured into the undisclosed hilly area to inspect a suspected mass grave site where they planned to open fire.

The former hit man alleged before the Senate inquiry that he and others in the liquidation squad took orders from Duterte and killed about 1000 suspected criminals and opponents of the mayor and the Duterte.

Matobato admitted that he had personally carried out at least 50 of the abductions and killings, including an attack on a suspected kidnapper who was hogtied and fed alive to a crocodile.

“Our job was to kill criminals like drug pushers, rapists, snatchers. That’s what we did. We killed people almost every day,” Matobato said.

Journalist assassinated
In one of the most serious claims, the former hit man also alleged that Duterte had had Davao broadcast journalist Jun Pala, a vocal critic of the president when he was Davao mayor, killed.

Responding to the testimony, one of the most influential national dailies, Philippine Daily Inquirer, declared in an editorial that the serious allegations ought to be thoroughly investigated but with “caution and scepticism”.

Until then, noted the newspaper, the president enjoyed the presumption of innocence, “as he must”.

“But herein lies the eternal paradox of our times: the demand for fairness and due process is quickly made when it applies to the powers that be; there is no question, of course, that they deserve it,” said the editorial.

“Those killed so far in the war on drugs – the padyak drivers, the petty pushers in fraying flip-flops, the denizens of dark alleys yelling surrender – did not have the luxury of being afforded the same.

“And here Philippine society is today, in an ever-deepening rabbit hole of national cognitive dissonance.”

The PCIJ has revealed that Duterte has not signed, and the Office of the President has not released, any executive order to define his role and accountability for the war on drugs

A police Project Double Barrel “kill list” in the small Bicol
town of Vizons. Such a quiet town apparently has no statistics.
Photo: David Robie

‘I will protect you’
But the President has publicly declared to policemen that they are acting under his presidential protection: “I will protect you. I will not allow one policeman or one military to go to jail.”

According to the PCIJ, as at September 18 the latest national Philippine police report cited:

  • Killed in police operations – 1140
  • Killings by unidentified gunmen “under investigation” – 1391
  • Drug pusher suspects arrested – 17,428
  • “Surrendered” – 714,803 (661,737 alleged drug users and 53,066 alleged drug pushers)
  • Houses “visited” – 1,041,429
The PCIJ said: “Whichever is the correct PNP count, these numbers best the casualty tally during the 14 years of martial law under the late strongman Ferdinand Marcos; from 1972 to January 1981, Amnesty International had recorded a total of 3240 persons killed, 34,000 tortured, and 70,000 imprisoned in the Philippines.”

Human Rights Watch and other groups have called for a full United Nations inquiry into the Philippines extrajudicial killings following the detailed testimony from former hit man Matobato.

But calls within the Philippines for impeachment by the powerful Liberal Party were dealt a blow when Vice-President Leni Robredo (who belongs to the party) declared that she hoped no impeachment process would take place, adding it was destined to fail through lack of numbers in Congress.

Despite political differences, she said, it was the duty of every citizen to support the elected President.

]]>