Page 1209

FSM, Marshall Islands envoys seek details on police-involved shootings

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

FSM Ambassador Akillino Susaia (centre) at a welcome reception in the US … diplomatic note seeking answers over shootings of Micronesians in US. Image: FSM

By Giff Johnson in Majuro

Ambassadors to the United States from the Federated States of Micronesia and the Marshall Islands are seeking information about officer-involved shootings that resulted in the death of citizens from their nations in the US over recent weeks.

FSM Ambassador Akillino Susaia has asked the US State Department for help in accessing information on the shooting deaths of two Micronesians in Tulsa, Oklahoma in early June, while Marshall Islands Ambassador Gerald Zackios is seeking information from the family of Marshall Islander Isaiah Obet, who was shot and killed by police in Auburn, Washington on June 17.

Both ambassadors are based in Washington, DC.

“We have spoken to the Tulsa Police Department and were directed to the Detective Homicide Division, but so far have not received any information or feedback,” Susaia said.

To follow up the shooting deaths on June 2 of Micronesians Naway Willy, 18, and Rabson Robert, 36, Susaia sent a diplomatic note to the State Department last week requesting the federal government’s aid to obtain information from local law enforcement authorities about the incidents.

News reports indicated that Robert had been killed during an argument at a hotel and Willy was initially thought to be a suspect in the murder, but later police said they did not believe Willy was involved and arrested another suspect in Robert’s death.

-Partners-

News reports indicated that Willy was at the scene and fled after the shooting of Robert. Willy was shot and killed by policemen who were called to the scene of the shooting.

Charged with murder
Subsequently Tulio Alexander Aviles, 33, was charged with first-degree murder for the shooting of Robert.

In the diplomatic note, the FSM Embassy notes the “request for assistance is necessitated by the incident that took place on or around 2 June 2017 in Tulsa in which two citizens of the FSM, both of them young men, were reportedly shot to death by local law enforcement officers.”

The ambassador said he was requesting the US State Department’s assistance under the terms of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and the provisions of the Compact of Free Association, a treaty that closely ties the U.S. and the FSM.

The carefully worded request to the State Department also pointed out “the long history of law enforcement cooperation between FSM and the US” under the Compact that was first established in 1986.

“Their (Robert’s and Willy’s) families and friends have sought to obtain information from the Tulsa Police Department but were not successful,” the FSM diplomatic note explained.

“They have turned to the Embassy for assistance.”

The diplomatic note added that the embassy had also been unsuccessful in getting through to the Detective/Homicide Division of the Tulsa Police Department.

The embassy requested State’s help in “facilitating the process to enable the Embassy to obtain relevant information.”

Expressed condolences
Susaia expressed condolences to the families and friends of the victims. He said he did not want to “make specific judgments on the police-involved shootings while all the relevant facts of the case have yet to be confirmed.”

He took the opportunity to “remind us all about the importance of conducting ourselves appropriately to avoid harm and, just as important, for law enforcement authorities to exercise prudence or due diligence in the conduct of their duties and responsibilities to the public.”

While Susaia said the embassy did not speak for the families of the victims or “wish to prejudge the course of action that they may finally decide to pursue, the FSM Embassy will do what is necessary and appropriate. The primary objective of the Embassy is to ensure that justice to our citizens is administered fairly and to assure them and the community at large that we are doing the best we can in the interest of our citizens to the fullest extent provided by the law and Compact.”

While noting that “the Embassy is aware of the rise in police-related incidences in the United States,” Susaia said the FSM is “grateful for the basic decency and fairness of the American people, whom we hope will continue to be the advocates and tireless moral pillars of support for the friendship and historic ties between our peoples that are enshrined in the Compact of Free Association, and which serve as the foundation of the special partnership between the FSM and the US.”

For his part, Marshall Islander Isaiah Obet, 25, was killed in Auburn, Washington while attempting to carjack a vehicle. News reports of the incident said that he went into an Auburn residence holding a knife and demanded money from the woman in the house. She told him to leave and he did, after which she called the emergency number 911.

Police responded to find Obet in another nearby house. He fled and was chased by police and then attempted to carjack a vehicle with two people in it when the officer opened fire, killing the man. News reports said Obet died at the scene from multiple gunshot wounds.

Zackios said he was attempting to get information from Obet’s family in Auburn before taking possible next steps.

Giff Johnson is editor of the Marshall Islands Journal. This article is republished from the Marianas Variety with permission.

]]>

PM O’Neill casts his vote in local village, shrugs off polling delays

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Prime Minister O’Neill casts his vote in home village of Kauwo. Video: EMTV News

By the EMTV News elections coverage team

Papua New Guinea Prime Minister Peter O’Neill has finally cast his vote in the general election.

O’Neill voted in his local village, Kauwo, in Pangia Southern Highlands province yesterday, reports EMTV’s

Before polling began, the community had a church service.

Polling for Ialibu-Pangia was deferred for two days following complaints and a petition by candidates over missing ballot papers and appointment of presiding officers among other concerns.

Earlier, after Friday’s polling hold-up in the Southern Highlands, O’Neill called for election delays to be put into perspective.

-Partners-

He claimed the 2017 elections had been a dramatic change from the previous three elections where there was violence and the electoral process had been “hijacked”.

Speaking from Mendi, the incumbent Prime Minister said voting in his province had been delayed, but it is better to wait and ensure the process was run properly.

‘Understand the hardship’
“While the delay is disappointing, we understand the hardship and the difficulties that election officials are going through,” O’Neill said.

“Putting this in perspective, I hear comment from election observers that delays like this are common in developing country elections, particularly with remote and rugged terrain and diverse cultures.”

The Prime Minister said the leaders he had spoken with were pleased with the manner in which the election was taking place and the public’s reception to the election process.

“Unlike previous elections, there is relative calm in this province and other provinces,” O’Neill said.

He said there had been very good campaigning conducted in Southern Highlands province, and around the region.

“This was not the experience of 2002, 2007 and 2012 where certain candidates hijacked the election process.

“People must not forget the failures and hardship or previous elections.

“In 2002, in Southern Highlands and Hela provinces, there were seven failed elections.”

EMTV News stories are republished with permission.

]]>

Gary Juffa: Why these PNG elections are taking us towards dictatorship

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

OPINION: By Gary Juffa, current Governor of Oro and a candidate in these elections

I suspect that these Papua New Guinea elections have been so deliberately set to fail, leaving much room for fraud and confusion, that we will be distracted from what is really going on – the establishment of a dictatorship.

Already Prime Minister Peter O’Neill has his own special police unit that flies around Papua New Guinea escorting him in his private airlines, he has a special army unit of 40 exclusively for his callout, he controls the media and Public Service.

And, it seems, the Police and Defence commands — and perhaps the judiciary … the signs and red flags are blinking bright red now…

Yet many people do not see it at all. We are inching closer towards dictatorship and the ensuing bloodshed and violence that must come from the hostility towards it. But like lemmings and sheep, we are led to that reality with little resistance at all. Is this the Papua New Guinea we all believed in once upon a time?

This is what I wrote on my Facebook blog this week:

FAILURE TO PLAN OR A PLANNED FAILURE?

-Partners-

Today [Wednesday in Oro province] was a demonstration of how much the PNG government is NOT for PNG.

It was also a demonstration of how democracy should not work.

For instance, the majority — between a third and a half — of Popondetta Urban voting age citizens have NOT voted because the current common roll does not have their names.

Many citizens claim they had made the effort to update their details and were still were turned away.

Meanwhile, Electoral Commissioner Patilias Gamato has advised all that the preliminary roll can be used. This means that he indirectly agrees that the EC failed to effectively update the 2017 roll. This instruction was obviously not made known to Electoral Commission officials managing the polling at the Independence Oval today.

Many who had taken time out and had travelled into vote, were turned away angry and anxious. This election was certainly costing them. They will have to come back for the last day, but the slowness will probably ensure that a large group will not have been processed by the end of the polling day — 4pm.

This will mean that democracy certainly did not prevail in this instance. In fact, many will probably agree that come the end of these elections, democracy was hardly a reality everywhere in Papua New Guinea. This should hardly be a surprise given that we have actually endured a covert dictatorship and hardly realised it.

Own effort
Meanwhile, not a few of the learned are saying that everyone should have made their own effort to ensure they were registered.

A true statement we all would like to agree in the first instance. I was tempted to think this way too. Then I thought of my people in rural PNG. My uncles and aunts who do not read or write and are at once the greatest selfless humans I know and despite whatever people think, are equal shareholders of this great nation Papua New Guinea.

They too deserve to vote. They too deserve to be informed. They too have the right to be given the opportunity to decide whether they wanted to update their details on the common role or not.

May I just say to all my learned friends making such statements as “it’s your fault if you are not on the roll! Stop whinging”, that this would be true if the awareness had been been carried out sufficiently and it would be true in a society which is totally literate and where means of communication are available to all, a society that, say, had more then just 40 years or so as an independent nation of 1000 tribes with their own language groupings and cultural peculiarities.

Such statements are also spiteful about our people, my friends. Yes our people. Many who live in rural PNG and do not have access to the benefits of technology and modern services and goods that you may have had and may have now.

Yes, our people, remember them? Well some of these are the people who will adore you and feed you and love you selflessly when or should you ever go home for a visit from time to time.

It would also be a safe statement to make if Papua New Guinea were governed by a government which allowed information access and made it possible for all. A government that made funding available for provincial governments and relevant information dissemination entities like the National Broadcasting Corporation (NBC).

Government by the people
Of course, that would have to be a government of the people, by the people, for the people…which this government clearly is not if any of its decisions made in the last 5 years are anything to go by – i.e. next to none were in the interests of the people or the nation.

Back to Elections 2017. It is clear that the Electoral Commission failed. But the commission is not entirely to be blamed because, the buck stops at the top…and that’s the People’s National Congress (PNC)-O’Neill government.

They have totally failed in the last 5 years to ensure that everyone was on the roll.

For instance, the awareness was an abysmal failure. Rural Papua New Guinea especially had virtually no knowledge of this. That’s 85 percent of PNG.

For those who state that it is the fault of the voter, let us consider our voters first before making such statements.

Who are they?

Well, they are our people.

And most of them are illiterate.

And most of them are in rural PNG.

Whole day to travel
So lets say how can it be the fault of a substance farmer in Manau, Sohe, Oro province where it takes a whole day to travel to Popondetta by dinghy if one wanted to access any services.

A farmer who never had an education because the school there was closed for an entire decade? How is it his fault if he didn’t have access to radio because NBC is the only radio service and that has been so underfunded that it is barely functioning in most of rural PNG? He is one of a population of about 4000 people of voting age in Manau.

That’s an example.

These are the stories the length and breadth of PNG for the vast majority of Papua New Guineans.

Were our people adequately informed?

They were not.

The Electoral Commission had 5 years to do this.

They failed.

Just as they did with the K200 million national identity (NID) Project. Deliberately too it appears.

This government failed.

Peter O’Neill failed

The 2017 Elections are looking very much like a failure.

A planned failure perhaps … it has to be.

Sipping champagne
From our perspective, perhaps not from the PNC government’s perspective. Maybe they are chuckling and sipping champagne and congratulating each other on a job well done. Chaos provides opportunities for those who plan it to. Who knows?

Meanwhile in stark contrast, preparations for APEC seem to be going on very well. Surprise, surprise. Funding is abundantly available and preparatory meetings, plans, strategies and training and capacity testing efforts are well in progress. Not a few MPS whose companies will be involved in various services needed have already picked up hefty contracts.

So obviously the government can do a great job.

If it suits them.

But when it suits the people…well, they hardly care. There’s nothing in it for them.

So the people are all told that this one-off event, APEC 2018, which the country can barely afford will be “beneficial” for them and the country.

Yes, that’s right APEC … an event that will cost far more then the 2017 Elections and benefit PNG next to nothing.

Democratic rights
Ask yourself, is APEC more important then the democratic rights of a people to elect their leaders to represent their interests in Parliament?

I don’t think so. But of course not a few learned experts will disagree and be outraged by my lack of interest in international trade.

Who am I but just one of millions of Papua New Guineans who are obviously of no consequence or concern to this PNC government…

This just shows how much the PNC government cares for its people. How much? In my measure, it was so weak and poor an effort, so pathetic, that it was “zilch”.

Gary Juffa’s commentaries are frequently published by Asia Pacific Report with permission. This commentary is a combination of two of his latest pieces.

]]>

‘Peaceful’ Enga ready for voting in spite of bias claim against officials

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

EMTV News coverage on the PNG elections.

By Vasinatta Yama of EMTV News reporting from Wabag

Enga provincial election manager Anton Iamau says Enga is ready for polling next Tuesday in the Papua New Guinea general election.

He said this in spite of a few confrontations between the supporters of candidates and returning officers of a few electorates.

Enga provincial police commander Chief Superintendent George Kakas said the joint security forces were expecting a peaceful election for Enga.

Election manager Iamau said electoral officials could not bow down and listen to candidates and their supporters to defer polling next Tuesday.

“We are an independent body,” said Iamau.

-Partners-

Iamau said he was being confronted with supporters of some candidates from the Kombiam-Ambum electorate.

The candidates and their supporters had petitioned the PNG Electoral Commission in Wabag to change all the presiding officials, the returning officer and his assistant.

‘Biased appointments’
They claimed that the appointment of the officials was biased and was in favour of a particular candidate in the electorate.

Provincial police commander Kakas said the police and the joint security forces were managing every situation proactively and on a daily basis.

Kakas was expecting a peaceful election.

“Enga province has been passive as one of the hotspot areas in the country, in terms of tribal fighting during the election,” Kakas said.

“However, I would like to let the public know that people in Enga have changed and we will have a peaceful and successful election.”

Vasinatta Yama graduated from Divine Word University with a Bachelor’s Degree in Communication Arts, with majors in journalism and public relations and minors in international relations and diplomatic studies.

]]>

Rival Ialibu candidates accuse O’Neill of ‘rigging’ PNG general election

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Prime Minister’s protesting rival candidates Jerry Kiwai (from left), Nepoleon Rema, Tua Yasa, Stanley Liria, Justus Rapula, Leonard Pangepea and Dr Sam Kari at the Ialibu District Office in the Southern Highlands. Image: PSK/PMC

By Peter S. Kinjap  

Candidates contesting Papua New Guinea’s Ialibu/Pangia Open Electorate in the Southern Highlands province have accused Prime Minister Peter O’Neill of “rigging” the country’s national elections.

“Today confirmed everyone’s worst fears – these elections were deliberately rigged from the start,” said Stanley Liria, one of the candidates who signed a formal protest letter with election manager David Wakias before polling began in the electorate.

The open electorate is where Prime Minister O’Neill is the incumbent MP.

The rival candidates claimed in their letter the electorate was not ready for polling today.

The candidates are Jerry Kiwai, Nepoleon Rema, Tua Yasa, Stanley Liria, Justus Rapula, Leonard Pangepea and Dr Sam Kari.

At a meeting at Ialibu District Office, they unanimously agreed that certain issues be “properly addressed” before polling started.

The protest letter signed by the rival Southern Highlands candidates. Image: PSK/PMC

-Partners-

Their letter was registered with the manager Wakias.

‘Treating people like dirt’
Candidate Liria said people were fed up with corruption, dictatorship, lying, stealing, and “treating people like dirt”.

He said the people of Ialibu-Pangia were peaceful and hard working, and had the right to choose their new leader through a “fair, transparent and honest” process.

“O’Neill is denying you this constitutional, democratic right,” Liria said.

All candidates, apart from O’Neill, had “through blood, sweat and tears” visited the entire electorate on foot and seen the “disastrous lack of services and conditions” people had to endure, Liria said.

Claiming that polling day had confirmed fears that the elections had been rigged, Liria added on his Facebook page:

“No common roll, politically appointed presiding officers, failure to brief candidates, failure to select impartial political officials, failure to release lists of all polling officials — including 7 wards from Imbonggu within Ialibu-Pangia electorate [and a previously] … undefined ward in the electorate.”

These issues represented grave concerns for the integrity of the Ialibu-Pangia elections, and so the contesting candidates had served notice with manager Wakias.

“We have been robbed, and not only Ialibu-Pangia but all of PNG will suffer like never before.”

]]>

Lae police chief confirms ‘students’ set fire to PNG ballot papers – 2 detained

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Unitech ballot papers burning in Lae during the Papua New Guinea general election. Image: PSK/PMC

By Peter S. Kinjap in Port Moresby

Papua New Guinea’s Lae Metropolitan Police Superintendent Anthony Wagambie Jnr has confirmed that ballot papers were burnt at the University of Technology (Unitech) polling booth within the campus.

He said the destruction of ballot papers was an offence and any issues relating to shortage of ballot papers or common roll issues would be addressed by the Assistant Returning Officer and Returning Officer of the PNG Electoral Commission.

Two prime suspects have been apprehended by police in Lae while one is still being sought. His identity is known to the police.

The two suspects had got on a 25-seater bus parked outside the campus with a large group of people.

Police monitored them and a Mobile Squad Unit and Sector Patrol Unit intercepted them along the speedway, and then escorted the bus with the occupants to Lae police station.

The two suspects were identified and have been detained for further questioning.

-Partners-

They are from Southern Highlands and Hela provinces, while the third suspect is from Enga province.

Claimed to be students
The suspects claimed to be students while one claimed to be a former student who graduated recently and is now employed by the university. The university administration has not confirmed this.

The 25-seater bus has also been grounded at the Lae police station while the driver and crew are being questioned.

Unitech was given only 1100 ballot papers for a voting population of more than 5000 while the University in Goroka (UOG) voting population of between 4000 to 5000 was denied aa chance to cast a ballot.

UOG was never gazetted as a polling venue even though the Eastern Highlands provincial election manager included it in his recommendation to the Chief Electoral Commissioner.

At the University of Papua New Guinea (UPNG) at Gerehu, Port Moresby, voting did not take place because of a lack of ballots, Asia Pacific Report’s special campus correspondent reported. Only 1200 ballot papers arrived from the Electoral Commission instead of the expected 5000 and there were many complaints about the absence of names on the rolls of people who had registered.

Students confront election officials at the University of Papua New Guinea today. Image: Citizen Journalist

National Capital District (NCD) Elections Manager Terence Hetinu and his assistant Roslyn Tobogani have been removed and replaced with new officers for today’s polling after both had been caught on Tuesday reportedly in possession of large sums of money and a document signed between Hetinu and a Port Moresby candidate.

Although Electoral Commissioner Patilas Gamato defended his staff, saying the money was for the payment of election officials, Port Moresby police said they would continue a full investigation after the elections and lay charges.

Commissioner Gamato has appointed two senior electoral officials as replacements —  Provincial Election Manager Alwin Jimmy as the new NCD Election Manager, and Kavanamur Bale as Assistant Manager.

Candidates demand removal
Gamato announced the appointments when he met with candidates at Electoral Commission headquarters on Wednesday afternoon.

The candidates in Port Moresby had petitioned Gamato, demanding the removal of Hetinu and  Tobogani after they were detained by police on Tuesday.

While police searched Hetinu’s car, they also found an agreement signed between a Port Moresby Regional Seat candidate and the then NCD Election Manager.

New election manager Jimmy assured the media, Port Moresby candidates, voters in Port Moresby and the people of Papua New Guinea that today’s NCD election would go ahead as scheduled.

Although only one day into his new job, he said he would make sure he delivered a successful polling day for Port Moresby.

He also apologised to the people of Papua New Guinea about what had happened.

Another elections twist
In another elections twist, the Electoral Commission office has reportedly more than K36 million (about NZ$15.4 million) owing to its suppliers from the last general election in 2012. Those suppliers were reportedly not paid.

Gamato said he was aware of the outstanding payments and had put the claims through the government payment system.

In Goroka, polling in rural areas has been delayed because the helicopter company hired to dispatch ballot papers and officials to the designated polling areas wanted payments paid upfront before airlifting the ballot papers and officials to the sites.

Goroka rural voters are still waiting for the ballot papers to arrive for polling while polling in areas with road access have been completed.

Peter S. Kinjap is an Asia Pacific Report contributor.

Port Moresby election materials being set up by officials for today’s voting. Image: Peter S. Kinjap
]]>

‘We crossed 11 rivers with water up to our necks to do our job’ in PNG ballot

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Police officer Fred Rimbao (from left), polling officer Joe Bais and presiding officer Jim Inamuga with the two ballot boxes they carried on a marathon journey before being picked up by vehicles and taken to Madang in the PNG general election. Image: Zachery Per/Nationalpic

By Zachary Per in Madang

A three-member polling team has told of how they had to walk for hours carrying two ballot boxes, crossing 11 rivers and sleeping at a village to accomplish their task in Papua New Guinea’s general election.

Polling Team 52 was led by presiding officer Eric Inamuga and included polling official Joe Bais and police officer Fred Rimbao.

They were in charge of the 572 marked ballot papers for the Goroka Open electorate in the Highlands.

They were sent to remote Wessan in the Goroka electorate on the border of Eastern Highlands and Madang.

Inamuga said they travelled on Monday by helicopter to Wessan but could not land because the pilot was unable to identify the site.

“We returned to Goroka and made the second trip to Wessan the next day. We were dropped off at the Simili polling station to conduct polling there,” Inamuga told The National daily newspaper.

-Partners-

“We finished around 3 pm and waited for pick-up. The helicopter did not return so we spent the night with the locals at Wessan.”

They waited for pick-up until 1.30pm on Wednesday and decided to walk to Madang to catch transport to Goroka.

“We crossed 11 fast-flowing rivers, including the Ramu River. The water came up to our chest and neck.

“We braved through and managed to get to Kesevai along the Madang Highway about 6.30pm. A police team and an official election vehicle picked us up at 7pm on Wednesday.”

Police officer Rimbao said they had to spend around K120 (about $52) for accommodation, meals and other incidentals to do their election job.

Loop PNG reports today nearly three-quarters of Papua New Guineans have started voted, according to the PNG Electoral Commission. The rest will vote within the 14-day ballot period.

Port Moresby voters in the National Capital District (NCD) began their one-day polling today after the postponement from Tuesday.

]]>

PNG Media Council seeks opinion over Cybercrime Act’s ‘free speech’ impact

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

PNG’s Media Council president Alex Rheeney (centre) talking at last year’s World Journalism Education Congress (WJEC) in Auckland. Image: Del Abcede/PMC

By Geraldine Kalabai in Port Moresby

The Media Council of Papua New Guinea is seeking a legal opinion on the effects of the government’s 2016 Cybercrime Act on press freedom, freedom of expression and public access to state information.

”The council, in its last meeting last Friday agreed that legal opinion should be sought on the impact that the August 2016 legislation will have on the ability of ordinary Papua New Guineans to express themselves through various communication platforms and whether the law hinders the ability of the PNG media to report with fear or favour,” the council said in a statement.

Media Council president Alexander Rheeney said the council supported some sections of the law that protected citizens.

However, he added the council was particularly concerned with Section 10 (on data espionage), 21 (defamatory publication), 25 (unlawful disclosure), 26 (spam), 31 (unlawful advertising), 33 (search powers), and 44 (criminal liability of ICT service providers).

The Media Council said there was no government consultation with the media industry when the legislation was first put forward before its enactment.

Rheeney said two experts would study Section 46 of the PNG Constitution on freedom of expression and provide their opinion on how the 2016 Cybercrime Act would impact on the rights of citizens.

-Partners-

The findings would be put to council members for their consideration and deliberation and to identify a course of action if needed.

Rheeney added that the current general election opened up the opportunity to the council and the media industry to lobby for changes to the legislation when the new national Parliament gets elected, depending on the advice of the legal experts.

Geraldine Kalabai is an EMTV News reporter who studied international relations and PNG studies at Divine Word University.

]]>

Chaotic PNG election scene in Moresby with cancelled polling, 4 ‘arrests’

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Voting in Abau district in Papua New Guinea’s Central Province, near Port Moresby. Image: Belinda Kora/PNGFM

Pacific Media Centre Newsdesk

Papua New Guinea’s general election has been rocked with many disruptions, the cancellation of the capital Port Moresby’s one-day polling, and the arrest of four senior election officers for carrying K185,000 (NZ$80,000) in cash and “suspicious” documents.

Electoral Commissioner Patalias Gamato vowed he would not resign in the face of a barrage of criticism, Loop PNG reports.

The National newspaper reports that the four were questioned but later released because police had to first obtain arrest warrants from the court.

National Capital District-Central police commander Assistant Commissioner Sylvester Kalaut was quoted by the newspaper as saying they have not been charged but may be re-arrested.

The drama began around dawn on Tuesday when election workers, who had been “camping” all night to prepare for the one-day polling in the three electorates in the National Capital District (NCD), decided to stage a protest strike because they had not been paid their “camping” allowance.

Commissioner Gamato, after consulting NCD Election Manager Terence Hetinu and police, deferred polling until tomorrow.

-Partners-

People who had arrived early at the various polling stations were told to return on Friday.

Cash for the workers
Then Hetinu, according to Gamato, who was bringing the cash to pay the workers, was brought in by police to brief them on the polling cancellation.

Officers became suspicious and arrested him when they found the large amount of cash in his vehicle.

In an unrelated event later, according to Kalaut, police officers arrested three other election officials in front of the Boroko Electoral Commission office allegedly trying to transport election-related materials in an official vehicle but without any official police escort.

“We have questioned and released them. We have to obtain a warrant of arrest to charge them for the relevant offences under the Criminal Code,” Kalaut said.

Kalaut said Hetinu would be questioned later on “correspondence” police allegedly found between him and a candidate.

Gamato said he would consider disciplinary action against Hetinu if he was found to be in contact with NCD candidates, The National reports.

On the cash Hetinu was carrying around, Gamato said: “We had made arrangements to organise payments for camping allowances. He was carrying that cash around when police picked him up.

3000 Port Moresby election workers
“Police also questioned me and I said I was aware of that.”

More than 3000 election workers had been engaged by the commission for polling and counting in Port Moresby.

Gamato agreed that it was “not normal” for someone to be carrying such a large amount of money around Port Moresby but “that cash was made available as soon as possible in the morning”.

Gamato said there was a system in place for election managers to pay election workers, based on the list of names provided.

]]>

Under fire PNG elections chief vows he will not resign

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Electoral Commissioner PNG’s Patilias Gamato … defiant in face of flood of complaints. Image: Loop PNG

Papua New Guinea’s under fire Electoral Commissioner Patilias Gamato says he will not step down and will continue to ensure the general election is “run smoothly”.

Gamato was grilled by reporters during a media conference in Port Moresby but remained defiant.

Since polling began on Saturday in the country, many negative reports have been made public, reports Loop PNG’s Cedric Patjole.

Among them was the late start of polling teams, resulting in fewer votes being cast and people and students being turned away due to missing names, despite registering earlier this year.

The deferral of polling in the National Capital District (NCD) – Port Moresby — from Tuesday until this Friday, the ousting and detention of the NCD Election Manager and several polling officials over suspected electoral breaches has put more pressure on the Commissioner.

Responding to a barrage of questions, Gamato was eventually asked if he would step down — and he promptly replied: “I don’t think I’ll have to resign. I’ll have to conduct these polls.”

Ten candidates contesting seats in the NCD have called on Gamato to resign and for the Deputy Electoral Commissioner, Kala Moro, to assume office.

-Partners-

They accused Gamato of being incompetent and that he had compromised his position, Patjole reported.

Gamato told the candidates that he would prepare a formal response to them.

In a separate story, Loop PNG reports the Electoral Commission today replaced NCD Election Manager Terence Hetinu and his assistant Roslyn Tabogani.

Alvin Jimmy was named as replacement, assisted by Bale Kavanamur.

]]>

Ban the bomb – how NZ’s ordinary ‘Davids’ checked the nuclear Goliath

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Pacific Media Watch editor Kendall Hutt’s video on the nuclear free law campaign.

Off The Wall: with Padre James Bhagwan in Suva

As we conclude the month of June 2017, it would be remiss of me not to draw our attention to our neighbour New Zealand, which yesterday broke a 14-year drought on the water to convincingly win the oldest trophy in international sport — the America’s Cup.

However, the emergence of New Zealand as a yachting superpower is not the only reason it makes history this month. This year marks the 30th anniversary of Aotearoa becoming a “nuclear-free” country when the NZ Nuclear Free Zone, Disarmament, and Arms Control Act came into force on 8 June 1987, the day we globally mark as World Ocean’s Day.

Professor David Robie, director of the Pacific Media Centre, believes activist movements in New Zealand through the 1980s helped spark the change needed for the country’s nuclear-free stance in the Pacific.

“What pushed NZ in the direction it did with the nuclear-free approach was the masses of activism, of just ordinary people, people getting out on their boats on Auckland harbour for example.”

Speaking at an event, “Celebrating 30 years of Nuclear-Free Aotearoa/New Zealand 1987/2017,” organised by the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF) — Aotearoa, Dr Robie said the process to achieve the nuclear-free stand was a David and Goliath struggle to make NZ nuclear-free against the US and global pressure.

-Partners-

“The real ‘David’ were the ordinary people of New Zealand who exerted extraordinary pressure on the government to deliver. The barrages of letters from citizens, constant lobbying by peace campaigners, local councils … declaring themselves nuclear-free, the door-knocking petitioners and, of course, the spectacular protests.”

Rongelap schoolchildren and their teacher being forced to leave their atoll in 1985 on board the Rainbow Warrior due to the ravages of the unhealthy legacy left by post-war nuclear testing in the Marshall Islands. Image: © David Robie/Eyes of Fire

Pacific ‘ahead of the game’
The author of Eyes of Fire: the Last Voyage of the Rainbow Warrior (1986, 2005 and 2015), and Don’t Spoil My Beautiful Face: Media, Mayhem and Human Rights in the Pacific (2014) also reflected on the impact of what happened in NZ on the Pacific, acknowledging some small Pacific countries and communities who were actually ahead of the game:

  • 1979 — The Republic of Palau (Belau) adopted a nuclear-free Constitution and was forced by the US to hold a further 10 referenda in attempts to undermine the document. The “father” of the Constitution, President Haruo Remeliik, was assassinated on June 30, 1985. In the end, the people of Belau were ironically forced to vote to drop their nuclear-free status for “economic survival” a month after New Zealand’s Bill became law;
  • 1980 — The newly independent nation of Vanuatu, formerly the New Hebrides, also adopted a nuclear-free Constitution and banned nuclear ships from its territorial waters. The country was led by the inspirational Father Walter Lini, who linked nuclear weapons with colonialism;
  • 1983 — Tahiti’s airport suburb of Fa’aa led by mayor Oscar Temaru, who later became president of French-occupied Polynesia several times, declared itself nuclear-free; and
  • 1987 — The first Fiji Labour Party government led by Dr Timoci Bavadra also planned to bring in a nuclear-free law but was deposed at gunpoint in the first military coup of Lieutenant-Colonel Sitiveni Rabuka in May that year.

Why is this 30th anniversary of a nuclear-free NZ and the Pacific struggle to also be nuclear-free important today?

According to ICAN (International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons), nine countries together possess around 15,000 nuclear weapons. The US and Russia maintain roughly 1800 of their nuclear weapons on high-alert status — ready to be launched within minutes of a warning.

Many times more powerful
Most are many times more powerful than the atomic bombs dropped on Japan in 1945. A single nuclear warhead detonated on a large city could kill millions of people with the effects persisting for decades.

The failure of the nuclear powers to disarm has heightened the risk of other countries acquiring nuclear weapons. The only guarantee against the spread and use of nuclear weapons is to eliminate them without delay. Although the leaders of some nuclear-armed nations have expressed their vision for a nuclear-weapon-free world, they have failed to develop any detailed plans to eliminate their arsenals and are modernising them.

Part of Gil Hanly and John Miller’s photo exhibition in Devonport this month of anti-nuclear coummunity activism, Peace Squadron flotillas and the bombing of the Rainbow Warrior. Image: David Robie/PMC

Someone, who participated in the early Pacific-wide protest movement against nuclear weapons testing and militarisation of the Pacific region, Fiji-based Vanessa Griffen says: “In the Pacific, we have collectively experienced the known and unknown consequences of nuclear weapons use, the push by non-nuclear states for a ban on nuclear weapons is the only sensible, humane and responsible course of action to take.

“Nuclear weapons states should be regarded, collectively, as lawless and flouting international humanitarian standards.”

Griffen became aware of the environmental and genetic impacts of radioactivity from French nuclear weapons testing in French Polynesia as a student at the University of the South Pacific. She joined the anti-nuclear movement ATOM (Against Testing on Moruroa) and helped form the early Nuclear Free and Independent Pacific (NFIP) network.

Concurrently, she was part of the Pacific women’s movement which was always against nuclear weapons testing and for a peaceful Pacific.

She has been a representative of FemLINKPacific, a partner member of ICAN and the Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict (GPPAC).

Plea to use statehood
“Pacific Island states, with an unusually high experiential qualification for speaking up for nuclear disarmament, are a significant number in the United Nations and should use their statehood collectively and effectively on this global issue of nuclear disarmament,” she said.

From 1946 to 1958, the US conducted 67 atomic and hydrogen bomb tests at Bikini and Enewetak atolls in the Marshall Islands, accounting for 32 percent of all US atmospheric tests. In the 1960s, there were 25 further US tests at Christmas (Kiritimati) Island and nine at Johnston (Kalama) Atoll.

The UK tested nuclear weapons in Australia and its Pacific colonies in the 1950s. Starting in 1952, there were 12 atmospheric tests at the Monte Bello Islands, Maralinga and Emu Field in Australia (1952-57).

There were also more than 600 “minor” trials, such as the testing of bomb components and the burning of plutonium, uranium and other nuclear materials, conducted at Maralinga.

Under “Operation Grapple”, the British Government conducted another nine atomic and hydrogen bomb tests at Kiritimati and Malden islands in the central Pacific from 1957 to 1958.

After conducting four atmospheric tests at Reganne (1960-61) and 13 underground tests at In Eker (1961-6) in the Sahara desert of Algeria, France established its Pacific nuclear test centre in French Polynesia.

For 30 years between 1966 and 1996, France conducted 193 atmospheric and underground nuclear tests at Moruroa and Fangataufa atolls.

Fragile ecology
Their impact on the fragile ecology of the region and the health and mental wellbeing of its peoples has been profound and long-lasting. Pacific Islanders continue to experience epidemics of cancers, chronic diseases and congenital abnormalities as a result of the radioactive fallout that blanketed their homes and the vast Pacific Ocean, upon which they depend for their livelihoods.

As you read this, the United Nations is convening negotiations in 2017 on “a legally binding instrument to prohibit nuclear weapons, leading towards their total elimination”. This new international agreement will place nuclear weapons on the same legal footing as other weapons of mass destruction, which have long been outlawed.

The negotiations began at UN headquarters in New York for one week in March and will continue from June 15 to July 7, with governments, international organisations and civil society participating.

Despite being the most destructive, inhumane weapons ever invented, nuclear weapons are the only “weapons of mass destruction” that are not yet banned under international law. (Chemical and biological weapons are both banned internationally.)

In December 2016, the UN General Assembly took action to address this crucial gap, voting to begin negotiations in 2017 for a treaty to ban nuclear weapons.

Pacific Island governments have joined the historic talks at the United Nations that should result in an international treaty that bans nuclear weapons as the second, and possibly final round of negotiations aims to have a final text on a treaty adopted in early July.

Reverend James Bhagwan is an ordained Methodist minister and a citizen journalist. He contributes the regular “Off The Wall” column to The Fiji Times and this article is republished with permission. The opinions expressed in this column do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Methodist Church in Fiji or the newspaper.

]]>

First report tracking Samoan youth unemployment to help policy

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Researchers working on the Samoan National Youth Council’s tracer survey seeking to create a database about youth participation in the economy. Image: SNYC

By Brandon Ulfsby in Apia

A youth employment survey report in Samoa is seeking to inform government policy decisions after its findings take a closer look at young people.

Published by the Samoan National Youth Council, the report highlights the economic and employment status of youth and the reasons behind leaving school and calls for greater inclusion of youth in policy development.

Called the Tracer Youth Employment Survey (TYES), the report was commissioned with the assistance of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and funded by the Australian High Commission in Samoa.

The survey sampled 790 people aged 18-to-35 years from 14 villages across Upolu and Savaii and was launched to the public on Monday in Apia.

Results found that out of the sample size, 78.93 percent of young people dropped out of school at primary and secondary level.

The main reason being families could no longer afford school fees with others becoming caretakers for family members.

-Partners-

A 2015 study by the Ministry of Women, Community and Social Development’s youth division identified that just over 16 percent of Samoa’s youth were unemployed.

The TYES report found that the most significant challenge to young people in continuing their education is the increasing rate of dependent peoples – elderly and younger children.

Findings found this to be particularly challenging for rural youth.

Priority report hope
The report was funded by Australia as part of its Pacific Leadership program in the region.

Australian Deputy High Commissioner Amanda Jewell says the report gives young Samoans more of a voice and is a priority that they will be looking at with the Samoan government.

“This is like a beginning for us because this particular survey has started and it’s given us some good ideas, and they’ll be some recommendations coming out of that, that we can go forward with.”

Findings in the survey found that despite a majority of respondents being unemployed, over 30 percent of them still identified themselves as “economically active”.

These activities include, crop farming, cooking, family run canteens, part time referees and a florist.

Report recommendations call for greater inclusion of youth in policy development at local and national level.

Jewell says “the priority for the commission here is to work in partnership with the government of Samoa so anything they identify as priority, and obviously by having this report produced it is a priority that we’ll be looking at having with them”.

Brandon Ulfsby is a final year Auckland University of Technology Bachelor of Communication Studies student journalist on a two-week Pacific Cooperation Foundation internship in Samoa.

]]>

Pacific exchange journalists begin NZ media ‘awareness’ internship

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

University of the South Pacific’s student journalists Linda Filiai (Tonga) and Shivika Mala (Fiji) at the Pacific Media Centre at Auckland University of Technology this week. Image: Del Abcede/PMC

By Kendall Hutt, Pacific Media Watch contributing editor

Pacific exchange journalists kicked off their two-week internship in New Zealand with a visit to the Pacific Media Centre.

Sponsored by the Pacific Cooperation Foundation (PCF), Shivika Mala, Linda Filiai and Joshua Lafoai will take an inside look at local media organisations during their stay.

Mala and Filiai from the University of the South Pacific in Fiji, along with Michelle Curran, project manager of PCF’s media programme were welcomed by Pacific Media Centre (PMC) director Professor David Robie.

“Kia ora and great to have you here with us,” he said.

Shivika Mala (Fiji) and Linda Filiai (Tonga) check out the screen screen effect in AUT’s TV studio. Image: Del Abcede/PMC

Dr Robie then went on to explain the work the Pacific Media Centre does in the Asia-Pacific region, and its place within the university.

“We’re the university that specialises in the Pacific, a lot comes out of this tiny little place,” he said during this week’s visit.

-Partners-

Curran said: “Thanks for having us, the girls are looking forward to it and they’ve got their questions all ready for you. The best way to kick off their internship.”

Inside look
The award-winning students then joined Pacific Media Watch freedom project editor Kendall Hutt on a tour of the Auckland University of Technology led by TV and radio technician Scott Creighton, where they had an inside look at AUT’s School of Communication Studies’ media facilities.

The students explored the television studios, where they discovered the ins-and-outs of a green screen, and student radio station Static 88.1.

They also visited the Media Centre and spoke to Te Waha Nui web editor Natalie Brittan about the student newspaper and the number of journalism students at the university.

Curran told Asia Pacific Report while on the tour that the PMC served as the right opening for their internship.

“Every time we’ve been here the students have really enjoyed it, learnt a lot and just taken in the exceptional facilities AUT offers. It’s great to have that connect for the students coming from the Pacific,” she said.

Curran said the aim of the internship was to raise the media’s consciousness about the Pacific and in turn enable student journalists to learn about another country’s industry.

A camera in AUT’s television studio. Image: Del Abcede/PMC

“It’s to create awareness about Pacific media, so New Zealand journalists will be more aware of what is going on in the Pacific and Pacific journalists coming into New Zealand will be more aware of how we do things here and hopefully learn things to take back to the Pacific,” she said.

Awareness of Pacific
This was also reflected by Mala and Filiai on PMC’s weekly radio programme Southern Cross.

Mala and Filiai told host Amanda Robinson their motivations behind applying for the internship. They both recognised the opportunity they had been given to take an inside look at New Zealand’s media industry.

“If we were to compare New Zealand to the Pacific, we are less fortunate, so we are so eager to take up this opportunity to experience, to learn and to share these experiences with our classmates and journalists in Tonga and the Pacific,” Filiai said.

Yesterday the team was working at Pacific Media Network, but will spend time with Tiki Lounge Productions, NZME, TVNZ and Tagata Pasifika over the course of their internship.

In the TV studio’s Green Room (from left): Kenneth Sageo-Tapungu (PNG), television technician Scott Creighton, PMC director Dr David Robie, Michelle Curran (PCF), Stephanie Sageo-Tapungu (PNG), Shivika Mala (Fiji), Linda Filiai (Tonga) and Kendall Hutt (Pacific Media Watch). Image: Del Abcede/PMC
]]>

Papua governor takes birds-of-paradise off the market

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

A West Papuan bird-of-paradise — known locally as cendrawasih. Image: TopK

By Asrida Elisabeth and adapted by Basten Gokkon 

In an attempt to conserve the birds-of-paradise for which the region is famous, Papua Governor Lukas Enembe has banned the use of their body parts in anything other than traditional ceremonies.

Hunting has helped push some paradise birds — members of the family Paradisaeidae — to the brink of extinction.

Historically, indigenous groups on Indonesia’s half of New Guinea island — composed of the Papuan and West Papua provinces — have used the birds’ colourful feathers in their rituals and traditional dress.

Meanwhile, others turn their parts into souvenirs, sold to tourists or handed out by local officials at events.

Last November, a university student in Papua sparked an outcry after she posted pictures of herself holding a dead bird-of-paradise, known locally as cendrawasih, and a hunting rifle.

Governor Enembe enshrined the ban in a circular letter, a mechanism typically used to support existing laws.

-Partners-

The provincial administration plans to issue a regulation specifying the consequences for violating the ban, according to Papua Regional Secretary Hery Dosinaen.

Raids on stores
Until then, the government will use the circular to raid stores selling products made from real bird-of-paradise parts.

In addition to raising awareness about the animal’s protected status, the policy is expected to give Papua’s creative industries a nudge by turning craftspeople onto artificial bird parts.

Alex Waisimon, who runs birdwatching tours out of Jayapura, the provincial capital, welcomed the ban: “Cendrawasih is a bird from paradise that God created for us to protect together.”

But he recognised a greater threat than hunting — the destruction of the birds’ forest habitat.

Indonesia’s rapid deforestation has long been concentrated on Sumatra and Borneo islands in the archipelago country’s west. But forest loss in the Papua region is on the rise.

Korean-Indonesian conglomerate Korindo is one firm expanding there. The oil palm planter was recently the subject of a NGO report that said it was responsible for 30,000 hectares of deforestation and nearly 900 fire hotspots since 2013.

The Ministry of Environment and Forestry has said it is investigating the company.

Republished from Mongabay with permission under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND licence.

  • WWF calls for conservation
]]>

‘Voice of the voiceless’ – Al Jazeera’s response over Saudi-led blog gag pressure

]]>

Report by David Robie. This article was first published on Café Pacific

The Doha headquarters of the global news network. Photo: Al Jazeera
An important media freedom statement: An open letter from Al Jazeera Republished on Café Pacific from the Doha-based global news network OVER two decades ago, Al Jazeera Arabic was launched with a simple mission: to provide reliable information to viewers across the Arab world. Ten years later, in 2006, Al Jazeera English began broadcasting with the same mission – to provide people around the world with accurate, balanced and impartial information. When Al Jazeera Arabic went on air in 1996, it was unique in the Arab world. Most media in the region at the time were state-controlled and often unchallenged mouthpieces for the different rulers and governments in the region. Al Jazeera was different, a truly independent voice, with a mission to hear and report the human stories that were otherwise ignored; to cover events with balance and integrity; and to hold power to account. Al Jazeera Arabic quickly gained a huge and loyal audience across the region. The information we provided became a lifeline to millions of people who wanted to know what was really going on around them. Al Jazeera Arabic has remained the most watched news channel in the Arab world throughout its history. Al Jazeera Arabic channel has more viewers than the combined total of our main competitors. Al Jazeera English is seen in more than 130 countries around the world, and is watched by tens of millions of people who respect our journalism. The global audiences are loyal to the Al Jazeera brand because of our continuous commitment to journalism; our dedication to covering stories impartially; and our determination to tell stories with no agenda and with total integrity. We at Al Jazeera believe in our mission: People have a right to be informed. They have a right to get news that is not controlled by the narrative of authorities. They have a right to know what is going on in their world. Equally, people have a right to have a voice. To have their stories told when they deserve and need to be heard. Freedom of speech – and the freedom for journalists to carry out their responsibilities – may be an accepted norm in many parts of the world, but it is a right, which is so often challenged for political gain in parts of the Arab world. The right to be informed by reliable information is one of the foundations of a healthy society. ‘Voice for the voiceless’ Throughout our long history, we have remained resolute in our commitment to storytelling, to balanced journalism, and to finding and covering stories. We have given a voice to the voiceless. We have shone a spotlight on the people and stories that would otherwise have remained in the dark. And we’ve always done so with responsibility and integrity. Journalists from all regions of the world have joined Al Jazeera because they believe in the mission of good journalism, and the responsibility that goes with it. Every day we cover stories from around the Arab world, Africa, Asia, Europe, and North and South America. We have more than 3,000 staff who are among the most talented and diverse in the world. Their commitment makes Al Jazeera what it is today. We have bureaus in more than 70 locations around the globe, including our headquarters in Doha and broadcast centres in London and Washington, DC, staffed by journalists whose courage and work ethic is unwavering They report on events first-hand. They report with integrity. They carry out their jobs with passion, and with responsibility. Their commitment to hear the voices of those caught up in events is available for all to see. Our staff are our “fabric”. They ensure our journalism is of the highest quality, is impartial, and has integrity. Our millions of viewers are a testament to the quality of our work. Every minute of every day, in tens of countries, on every distribution platform, millions of people choose Al Jazeera as their source of information. If we did not have integrity, if we were not reliable, our audience are intelligent enough to judge and would switch us off. For more than 20 years they have remained loyal to Al Jazeera, and we have always remained loyal to them and true to their demands for information. We have been accused of bias, of catalysing the Arab Spring, of having an agenda, and of favouring one group over another. We reject these allegations and our screens are a testament to our integrity. All our coverage is on show online and on TV for anyone to see and scrutinise. By covering events such as the Arab Spring, we don’t create those events. And as is the role of good journalism, we don’t take sides, instead, we hold the powerful to account for the decisions they make. Muzzling Al Jazeera We were once accused of bias because Al Jazeera Arabic was the first Arabic channel to have Israeli politicians and commentators on the air. But what we were doing was ensuring we heard and challenged all relevant voices in a quest for good journalism. We were accused of extremism when we interviewed members of the Taliban, but in fact we were asking the hard questions and ensuring we were challenging all sides of the story. We defend the freedom of expression and believe in people’s right to knowledge. We take no sides. We are no one’s messenger or spokesperson and we never have been. Al Jazeera – like all credible media organisations – has been challenged throughout its history. We have been criticised because our journalism shows what is really going on, and sometimes governments, corporations or individuals don’t want what they are doing to be seen. Our offices have been closed in the past by certain countries who didn’t want the truth to be seen. Most recently by Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Egypt. The satellite TV and online signals distributing our channels have been blocked by governments to prevent their people from seeing our content. Al Jazeera’s staff have been threatened, locked up, and killed as a consequence of carrying out their duties as journalists. Our colleagues in Iraq, Syria and elsewhere have paid the ultimate price while doing their jobs. We have also reported on critical and perhaps embarrassing issues in Qatar when they arose, including the plight of workers on construction sites and accusations of rights violations. We have covered stories that have been attacked by Bahrain, the UAE and Saudi Arabia because we showed what was really going on. Egypt not only attacked Al Jazeera for its coverage, but also, shockingly, imprisoned and sentenced our colleagues, whose only crime was their commitment to great journalism. Countries such as Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Egypt and the UAE may silence their own media and their own people’s freedom to speak out, but because Al Jazeera is watched by so many people in the Arab world, they want us gone. Reliable journalism Despite the pressure being exerted on Al Jazeera by these countries, and their calls for our closure, we have covered the region and events with balance and with impartiality, and we will continue to do so. We are a network that exists to cover all peoples; to hear human stories from all corners of the world; and to ensure that our information stands up to scrutiny in every country and from every person who watches or reads our news. The attempt to silence Al Jazeera is an attempt to silence independent journalism in the region, and to challenge everyone’s freedom to be heard and to be informed. This must not be allowed to happen. We are deeply proud of our journalism. We respect – and give thanks to – everyone we report about, and everyone we inform. We remain resolute in carrying out our responsibility of providing reliable information, and giving those we cover a voice. We are unwavering in our resolve to continue doing so, and we will proceed to tell the stories of the world from Kabul to Caracas and from Mosul to Sydney. We will continue to do our job with integrity. We will continue to be courageous in the pursuit of the truth. And we will continue to respect people’s rights to be heard.]]>

Walkout after Idul Fitri sermon turns into tirade against ‘blasphemer’ Ahok

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Anti-Ahok tirade leads to walkout at Yogyakarta sermon. Image: Viva News

Pacific Media Centre Newsdesk

There was an unusual sight during the 1438th Idul Fitri prayers at the Wonosari Square in the Gunungkidul regency of Indonesia’s Yogyakarta province, Central Java, last Sunday. The congregation dispersed in the middle of a sermon by mosque preacher Ikhsan Nuriansyah Bajuri.

Right from the start of the sermon, Ikhsan took up the blasphemy case involving former Jakarta governor Basuki Tjahaja Purnama or Ahok. The congregation, who had been sitting and listening to the sermon, stood up in unison, folded up their prayer mats and left the grounds.

Wonosari City Islamic Holiday Committee (PHPI) chairperson Iskanto confirmed what happened.

According to Iskanto, the sermon was considered too vulgar, contained too many accusations against other parties and made an issue of the Ahok blasphemy case.

“The issues raised may have been factual but for general consumption it was inappropriate”, he said.

Regret expressed
Iskanto expressed his regret over the incident saying a preacher should be able to gauge what is appropriate to be conveyed before a congregation. He hopes that in the future sermons will contain things that are refreshing and cheerful.

-Partners-

Right from the start of the sermon, Ikhsan immediately took up the blasphemy case that ensnared Ahok.

“Ahok is a blasphemer,” he said in front of the thousand or so strong congregation.

He then said that a blasphemer should not be defended or helped, let along assisted by the state, including the police. He said he fully supported the [two-year] sentence against Ahok and hoped that it would create a deterrent effect so that no one else will commit blasphemy.

In the end, the traditional Ikrar Halal Bihalal exchange of greetings and forgiveness that had been prepared following Idul Fitri prayers was only attended by a few people because most had already left.

Translated by James Balowski for the Indoleft News Service. The original title of the report was “Khatib Singgung Kasus Penodaan Agama, Jemaah Salat Ied Bubar“.

]]>

Bryce Edwards Analysis: The Hugely damaging Barclay scandal – Police Re-Investigate

]]>

Bryce Edwards Analysis: The Hugely damaging Barclay scandal

[caption id="attachment_13635" align="alignleft" width="150"] Dr Bryce Edwards.[/caption] It’s become a received wisdom that in New Zealand political scandals don’t really hurt governments. But English is looking very damaged by the Barclay saga, and it’s no longer too far-fetched to specutulate on whether this could help deny National’s re-election.
It’s now Day Eight of the Todd Barclay saga, and it’s still the number one political story in the media. This will be hugely concerning to the National Party, especially because most of the critical coverage in the last few days has focused on Prime Minister Bill English. His integrity and leadership skills are being widely questioned and that makes this scandal damaging.
Talk of “sex and drugs” has also entered the scandal, which will propel it even further. Newsroom’s Melanie Reid has revealed this afternoon that Parliamentary Service officials told an employment lawyer that talk of “sex and drug matters” had been recorded in the electorate office – see: Parliament officials knew details of Barclay tapes.
Police investigating National again
[caption id="attachment_14716" align="alignleft" width="150"] National Party MP Todd Barclay announced his resignation over illegal taping allegations.[/caption] The decision today by the Police to re-open their investigation into Todd Barclay merely reinforces how damaging this scandal now is. In the public mind it will simply add further legitimacy to the various allegations.
According to Stacey Kirk, the Police are focusing on the fact that Barclay’s statement on Tuesday appeared to accept that Bill English’s damning version of events was correct: “That statement is one of a number of new pieces of information police were assessing, in consideration over whether to open the police investigation. It could be treated as an admission from Barclay that he made recordings of Dickson without her knowledge and without being in a conversation with her – something police did not have before. The statement may add further weight to a text from English to the Clutha-Southland electorate chair that recordings existed” – see: Police reopen investigation into Todd Barclay.
Reopening the case also raises some serious questions for the Police. Prior to the announcement, Otago University law professor Andrew Geddis was reported as suggesting it wouldn’t happen: “What’s really needed to reopen the investigation is new information and basically everything we’ve been finding out has come from the police files … if police were to go back and reopen the investigation based on what we’ve heard it would raise real questions about why they didn’t proceed in the first place. So I doubt it” – see Emma Hurley’s Serial litigant threatens action over Barclay case if police don’t act.
Bill English’s grilling from the media
There is no doubt that the media is taking the Barclay scandal very seriously – the prime minister has been getting a grilling from journalists, and commentators and editorials have been scathing.
Today’s Southland Times – the newspaper published in Barclay’s electorate – has one of the most critical evaluations of English’s handling of the scandal. The editorial is titled, English wasn’t there for us.
The paper points directly to the attempts by English to downplay and spin the scandal as a “complicated employment dispute” and  “kaleidoscopically moving series of claims and counterclaims devoid of political significance”. The Southland Times strongly rejects this notion: “This doesn’t wash. In what he has done and in what he has failed to do, English has himself become a party to the deception of the public.”
English has sent a message that he does not to regard truthfulness as important: “His reaction was not to make the MP come clean with the truth. Nor, by his account, to find out what the truth was.” This “is rubbish” according to the editorial. And English’s claim not to remember who told him about the recording “does violence to common sense.”
The paper also has a very interesting take on English’s highly-pragmatic orientation to truth and conflict. They quote a previous statement about politics from Bill English: “In a rural community, everybody has to work with everybody. You can’t choose who, because there are not enough people to do that. You need a practical approach to things. . . they don’t spend too much time arguing about the philosophy of it all.”
The response from the paper is this: “How very practical. You play the cards you’re dealt, working with the people you must. But politics is not a game in which bluffing and misdirection are to be placidly accepted as tactical necessities. Especially when straightforwardness is such an important part of your brand. It’s a brand English himself has perceptibly debased.”
Other editorials are critical too. Today’s Herald says: “This is election year and minor slip-ups are bound to be magnified. Political leaders come under intense scrutiny and rightly so. Incidents such as this are often less important in substance than for what they tell us about the qualities of those we may be about to elect” – see: Bill English puts his foot in his mouth again.
Interviewers on the weekend politics programmes have been equally savage. It’s worth watching Patrick Gower’s 15-minute Interview: Bill English, and Corin Dann’s 14-minute Bill English speaks about his vision for National after a rocky week in politics.
And even on Breakfast TV, English has been getting a good grilling – see TVNZ’s ‘You need to front up and tell us what you know’ – Hilary Barry challenges Bill English over Todd Barclay saga.
Many of these interviews have merely made English look worse, particularly because he’s tended to introduce new lines and theories about the scandal. But by the time of the PM’s post-Cabinet meeting, he was clearly keen to stop saying so much – see Nicholas Jones’ ‘I’ve got nothing to add’: Bill English on repeat over Todd Barclay controversy. According to this report, “English answered a number of questions and in doing so said he had nothing to add 12 times. He eventually refused to answer more questions.”
And the PM’s lines are being torn apart by various commentators. For example, blogger No Right Turn explains how it’s unbelievable that such a senior politician could plead ignorance about the law in regards to this case – see: Pull the other one.
For a full list of all the various statements and apparent contradictions over the scandal, see Toby Manhire’s aggregation of English’s lines: ‘No point asking me all these questions’: Bill English in his own words on the Barclay affair.
For an interesting historical account of how the PM thought very differently about the merits of another scandal, see Branko Marcetic’s Remembering ‘paintergate’, and what Bill English had to say about it.
How badly damaged is National?
Unsurprisingly, the National Party is publicly feigning confidence that this scandal isn’t hurting at all. Most starkly, the deputy prime minister, Paula Bennett, has been reported as doubting “the Barclay affair would cause any long-lasting damage for the party or the Prime Minister” – see Jane Patterson’s Barclay affair a ‘tap’, not a ‘fatal blow’ for National – Deputy PM.
Some commentators have also shrugged their shoulders about it all. About a week ago, Mike Hosking suggested on Seven Sharp that the scandal wasn’t going anywhere – watch: Todd Barclay drama won’t hurt Government in the polls – Mike Hosking. Hosking gave his optimistic advice to Barclay: “The trick in life is how you handle the tough days – if he learns from this, then he’ll be just fine.”
Not all are convinced. National Party member and columnist Liam Hehir went along to the party conference in the weekend and reported: “This gave me the opportunity to talk to members and activists about how they felt about the past week. Annoyance at the leadership and its advisers for being asleep at the switch sums it up” – see: National must watch out before the ‘arrogant’ label sticks.
Hehir elaborates: “I don’t claim to have access to fancy data, but I do make a real effort to talk to people who only have a passing familiarity with politics. The feedback I have received is very much along the lines of: ‘It’s not a good look for Bill English’. Will this affect the election? Maybe. Probably not to any material degree, though.”
Drawing attention to 2011’s Teapot Tapes scandal and 2014’s Dirty Politics, Hehir says: “those controversies failed to move the needle on the public’s voting intentions. In each case, National’s vote held despite voters generally disapproving of it in those matters. While sore losers will always blame this on voters being too dumb or venal, when it came down to that single, macro decision about how to use their sole party vote, people based their decision on other factors.”
Bill English’s credibility and integrity under threat
Will Bill English be so dogged by the scandal that he gets a new nickname? “Billshit Bill”? It seems unlikely, but Graham Adams canvasses options in his article, Will the Todd Barclay affair earn Bill English a nickname that’ll stick?
But it’s English’s reputation as a leader that really could be tarnished. His “brand” is under threat according to Tracy Watkins, who says: “He effectively put a match to his own brand, bringing himself down to the level of just another politician, someone who is prepared to dissemble and duck for cover, rather than tell the truth. The English brand was supposed to be above all that – credible, trustworthy, a safe pair of hands. But to be fair expectations are not that high. Most voters expect politicians to be economical with the truth. So English is damaged, but not fatally, and maybe not even as badly as he could have been” – see: One all on the political score card.
This brand is important, according to Audrey Young, “because over many years he has earned himself a reputation as the conscience of the party. It was mainly through his devotion to the social policy issues but the flow-on effect has been that he has been regarded as a man of substance and principle” – see: No comparison between Labour’s intern strife and National’s crisis.
Young also says this tarnishing of his leadership is crucial, because “leadership and judgment will be a huge factor in the election.” And she doesn’t believe that this was a minor fall for the PM, saying that last “Tuesday was National’s worst day in nearly nine years of Government.”
Other commentators have also shown how much English has to answer over the scandal. Jane Clifton says: “English has had months to get on top of this furore and be ready to face the inevitable public questions, as well as to discipline Barclay for his mendacity and to use his considerable influence to cool down the angry locals. He either neglected or disdained to do any of those chores. That’s a serious failure of leadership” – see: The demise of Todd Barclay and all the Gor-r-rey details.
 
Commentator Colin James doesn’t believe the scandal will have a big impact on support for National: “Of itself, the Barclay affair probably has little effect on voter decisions. Three years ago Dirty Politics didn’t stop people voting National. Voters think all politics is dirty.” But James does think that “it taints English’s Mr Reliable image”, and even a small full in support could lose National the election: “if you take the same 3% off National’s current 47% poll average that came off in 2014 between mid-June and election day, its three tiddler support parties don’t make a majority” – see: National: “Continuity and stability” into the 2020s.
Similarly, the NBR’s Rob Hosking says the scandal will cause voters to now look more critically at English and National: “Voters are going to be reassessing that package now – probably with a bit more of a beady, narrowing of the eyes” – see: Lessons from the Barclay boilover (paywalled).
Conservative blogger Michael Reddell is much more critical already: “I don’t care greatly about Todd Barclay himself. What bothers me is Bill English, long-serving Minister of Finance, now Prime Minister, about to seek election to a full term as Prime Minister in his own right. They are roles in which we should be looking for leadership with integrity. What is on display this week doesn’t look remotely like that  – not much leadership, not much integrity” – see: Leadership and accountability.
Reddell elaborates: “It is pretty shameful conduct from the Prime Minister.  And pretty feeble leadership even now. There is no sign of contrition. There has been no apology. Even now, Barclay is still not indicating that he will be cooperating with the Police, still not apologising.  And yet he still sits in the National caucus. Meanwhile, media seem to find it impossible to get the President of the National Party to face the media on the issue –  even though if the Prime Minister told him otherwise he’d surely be available almost instantly.”
Finally, for satire about the scandal, see Toby Manhire’s Rumble from the Gore jungle, and The Civilian’s Winston Peters: I would never listen to any of my employees and Todd Barclay made decision to resign after listening to himself on Dictaphone. And for an updated view of the cartoonists views, see my blog post, Cartoons about the fall of Todd Barclay (updated)
Today’s content
 
All items are contained in the attached PDF. Below are the links to the items online.
National Party Todd Barclay scandal
Southland Times Editorial: English wasn’t there for us
Martyn Bradbury (Daily Blog): Are we witnessing a very Kiwi Coup?
Patrick Gower (Newstalk ZB): Latest Barclay dodging dents ‘Brand Bill’
John Small (SmallTorque): Character, Trust and Politics
Labour Party intern scandal
Martyn Bradbury (Daily Blog): Marama Fox should be ashamed of herself!
Pete George (Your NZ): Little and Labour MPs with interns
America’s Cup
Health
Harrison Christian (Stuff): Government skips debate on sugary drink tax
Peter Dornauf (Waikato Times): The time has come for euthanasia
Environment
Nina Hall and Max Harris (Stuff): NZ must speak out for Pacific on climate change
No Right Turn: Not grovelling after all
Election
Rob Hosking (NBR): Rethinking New Zealand: the big three issues (paywalled)
Tom O’Connor (Waikato Times): Brexit/Trump could happen here
Christchurch
Bridget Rutherford (Christchurch Star): Christchurch bylaw aimed at youths may breach Bill of Rights
Housing
Immigration and refugees
Mieke Welvaert (Informetrics): Most people coming from Australia…are Kiwi
Michael Reddell (Croaking Cassandra): Immigration and economic performance
Inequality and poverty
Muriel Newman (NZCPR): Time for a Change in Welfare Policy
Other
Max Rashbrooke (Werewolf): On how to make government more open
Russell Brown (Public Address): How journalism looks now
Rodney Hide (Herald): NCEA failure repeats itself
Shamubeel Eaqub (Stuff): Why are we not unleashing productivity?
]]>

PNG election officials face big ‘one day’ voting challenge in capital

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

One-day polling for Post Moresby residents takes place today. Video: EMTV News

By Eric Haurupma in Port Moresby

With Papua New Guinea’s National Capital District (NCD) polling set to begin today, the challenge is on how election officials will conclude the polling successfully in one day.

This is because of the vast majority of people from different ethnic groups living in the city who will take the time to cast their votes.

Electoral Commissioner Patilias Gamato who has been wary of this situation, is confident of delivering a successful polling day for NCD.

Chief Secretary Isaac Lupari speaking during the security and election deployment briefing yesterday told media that a metropolitan city like Port Moresby was difficult to manage during polling.

Lupari said this was because NCD had a majority of people from different ethnic groups across the country who would turn-up for polling.

-Partners-

This was something the electoral commission, particularly Commissioner Patilias Gamato, had been aware of.

Gamato said polling in NCD required extra manpower and security personnel to deliver polling safely.

NCD Metropolitan Superintendent Benjamin Turi said NCD police would tighten security to make sure the city was safe during polling today.

Eric Haurupma is an EMTV News journalist who studied at the University of Papua New Guinea, graduating with a Bachelor of Arts in Journalism and Public Relations.

]]>

Transparency sets up free hot line to report corruption during PNG election

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

A citizens video appealing to Papua New Guinean citizens to beat corruption and “vote for change”. Video: Mangi PNG

By Kiwiana Ngabung in Port Moresby

Transparency International PNG has provided a toll free hotline to report acts of corruption during Papua New Guinea’s general election.

Citizens have been called on to “make it our responsibility” to ensure a safe and transparent two-week general election.

The hotline number is (+675) 180 6000 or (+675) 7601 4636 and is operational from 8am-5pm during weekdays only. Voting began last Saturday at rolling voting places around the country.

Transparency International’s corruption hotline in Papua New Guinea. Image: PMC

Corruption, according to Transparency International, can be classified as grand, petty and political, depending on the amounts of money lost and the sector where it occurs.

In other words, it is a dishonest and unethical act for one’s own gain. And it comes in many forms – bribery, embezzlement, blackmail, threats, cheating and so on.

-Partners-

Voters, as well as any member of the public, are urged to report to Transparency International PNG, and help keep fairness at polling, counting venues and any other place for that matter.

Reporting corrupt practices by candidates, voters, candidate supporters and scrutineers will ensure a better future for Papua New Guinea — as the saying goes “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”.

Kiwiana Ngabung graduated from Datec Learning Centre in 2014 and is a contributor with EMTV Online.

]]>

Bryce Edwards Analysis: Bill English’s Dirty Politics scandal

Bryce Edwards Analysis: Bill English’s Dirty Politics scandal

[caption id="attachment_13635" align="alignleft" width="150"] Dr Bryce Edwards.[/caption] Is the Todd Barclay scandal the National Government’s 2017 version of Dirty Politics? Of course there are key differences, but there are also plenty of parallels. Either way, National will be hoping it’s a scandal with as little impact on the final election result.
Nicky Hager’s 2014 Dirty Politics expose gave the public an important insight into how politics really happens behind the scenes, and the Todd Barclay scandal is a useful refresher.
In Heather du Plessis-Allan’s must-read column from the weekend – see ‘This rot goes right to the top’ – she makes a direct link between the Barclay scandal and what happened in 2014, suggesting it will be a pity if the scandal dies down now, due to Barclay’s resignation: “The National Party is a party that knows how to silence a crisis. We saw it in 2014. The party sacrificed then Justice Minister Judith Collins in an attempt to shut down the Dirty Politics questions. Fast forward three years, Judith’s back and the questions remain unanswered.”
But du Plessis-Allan’s main point is that the latest Dirty Politics-style events indicate how serious the machinations have been at the top of the National Party: “We got an insight into how the National Party runs and, folks, it’s ugly. There are claims of hush money, claims of interference with a police investigation and claims of a cover up. It’s like a plot from House of Cards, minus a murder on the train tracks. Where’s the accountability from the Prime Minister? Bill English said Barclay had privately confessed to making the recordings, yet he allowed the junior MP to deny the same fact publicly for a year. Where’s the accountability from board member Glenda Hughes who allegedly advised the staffer to withdraw the police complaint? If proven, that seems like obstruction of justice. That comes with a jail term of up to seven years.”
[caption id="attachment_3138" align="alignleft" width="150"] Prime Minister Bill English.[/caption] In the Herald yesterday, Paul Little also drew direct parallels between the 2014 and 2017 scandals, suggesting that the latest one “did answer one question – whether the sorts of practices Nicky Hager called dirty politics and which its practitioners like to call by the self-romanticising name ‘the dark arts’ are still part of political culture? You bet. The least reprehensible of these practices is diversion – preventing people from looking at things you don’t want them to see” – see: The dark arts are still with us.
Little argues the whole crazy Barclay saga occurred because the young MP was simply operating in line with the culture of his party: “As it is, he can’t be blamed for having his own go at dirty politics, because, although for some people that book was the record of a scandal, for others it was a how-to guide.”
Political scientist Bronwyn Hayward asserts something similar: “This week raises questions about the prevailing culture within our politics, and especially the National party. Lying, dissembling, concealing the truth, spinning, call it what you like, these are powerful tools of dictators, autocrats, and populists but they also techniques that can undermine democracies” – see: Truth, lies, and democracy.
And she points out that other forms of subterfuge concerning the way National operates in government have recently come to light: “The Barclay fiasco emerged in the same week as it was confirmed that the former Minister of Trade Tim Groser used New Zealand’s GCSB to spy on competitors in his bid for the top job in the World Trade Organisation.”
If one of the main lessons of Hager’s 2014 book was that opportunism was overtaking principles in how politicians operate, then this has simply been proven again. Newstalk ZB’s Felix Marwick writes about this today: “The mess we’ve seen in the last week is the perfect example of what happens when politicians put politicking and self interest ahead of honesty and integrity. There’s simply no other explanation for the astounding level of idiocy that’s been on display from all involved” – see: Astounding levels of idiocy in Tapegate scandal.
The extreme attempts to control the political PR – as detailed so well by Hager – seem to be strongly at play again in 2017, and Marwick emphasises that it was this PR-related determination to close down any damage that ultimately made it much worse, leading to a serious erosion of Bill English’s public integrity. He says the delay in revealing the problem was critical: “when extra details were revealed it blew the whole gory spectacle wide open. The delay in their reveal makes the earlier actions to sweep the issue under the carpet look even worse. As a result we’ve see the Prime Minister make a series of changing, and at times conflicting, statements on what he knew, and when, about the matter. In short his credibility, and that of the government he leads, has been severely tested. The strongest currency any politician can ever have is the truth. They debase it at their peril.”
So overall, the public perhaps benefits from a further insight into how politics really works. In this sense, it’s worth reading two very good overviews of the story – see: Jane Clifton’s The demise of Todd Barclay and all the Gor-r-rey details, and Tracy Watkins’ ‘This is not how we do things’: How National’s composure was shattered by the Todd Barclay affair.
Spin-doctored politics
The National Government has gone into over-drive in its attempts at spinning this issue. And that probably explains how the prime minister has ended up making the scandal worse in recent days. When politicians are focused on PR instead of just being guided by principles and truth, they can easily make missteps in how they deal with such issues.
Hence, we’ve seen the spectacle of English giving further life to the scandal, in a rather incoherent fashion. First, in an interview with The Nation broadcast on Saturday, the PM claimed “It’s never been established that the alleged incident around the recording actually occurred” – see: I’m not a lawyer’ – Bill English on Barclay scandal.
And then on Sunday at the National Party conference he took a new line, revealing that “Barclay offered to play him the tape of his electorate agent’s conversations last year. English said he did not take up the offer” – see Audrey Young’s Bill English says Todd Barclay offered to play him tape.
As Duncan Garner suggests, “The current PM is certainly no John Key when it comes to sprinting backwards, blindfolded, out of a raging inferno without getting so much as singed” – see: In a week of slip-ups and sweatshops, Winston Peters wins.
Garner gives his very negative – yet probably quite correct – assessment of how politicians now operate when it comes to potential bad news: “What I learned in my time at Parliament was two things, sadly sceptical and breathlessly cynical, but this was my experience of a 17-year lag in the place. 1: The truth usually comes out, and 2; an MP’s default setting, when under pressure, is to lie.”
Of course, the upshot is that the obfuscation and overt spin doctoring repeatedly on display leads the public to want to “drain the swamp” according to Radiolive’s Mike Roke: “We are tired. Tired of the lies and the spin that we get day-to-day from the people we have elected to represent our interests. Trump, Brexit, Theresa May’s disastrous snap election – what more proof do politicians need to see that the people have had enough?” – see: Politicians like Todd Barclay are why Donald Trump won.
According to Roke, the spin-focused politics and Barclay-type cover-ups mean a new type of politics is necessary: “He is only 27 and was already showing signs of a career liar in the making. Imagine what kind of sociopath he could have become with another couple of decades in the Beehive? As much as I despise the phrase and despise the man who said it even more – let’s drain the swamp. Time to get rid of these career politicians. The ones that have been in the game far too long and have forgotten why they are there in the first place. To serve the people of New Zealand. To look out for the best interests of the people in their electorate. Let’s get some fresh blood in there. Young minds with fresh ideas that aren’t there for the money, cars, travel and benefits. Fresh ideas to fix up the absolute mess the ‘experienced’ politicians have left us in with housing, immigration, water etc.”
Dirty Politics inside the National Party 
The Barclay scandal also helps illustrate some of the internal National Party machinations and in-fighting that the public wouldn’t normally be aware of. After all, at the centre of this scandal was a war going on between, not just one MP and one staff member, but also between wider factions, officials and agendas.
The most interesting new aspect in this regard is revealed in Melanie Reid’s latest must-read Newsroom article, Barclay affair: What the board knew. This deals with some of the attempts that were made within the local Clutha-Southland National Party branch to get Barclay de-selected, and also some of the involvement of the National Party’s president and board members.
Apparently, prior to Barclay’s re-selection as the National candidate in December last year, local activists made the party president and board aware of why they regarded the MP an inappropriate representative. According to Reid, “The National Party President Peter Goodfellow and its board allowed Todd Barclay to be selected as a candidate for the upcoming election despite knowing he was clearly unsuitable to be an MP.” She says that “In total, the board received at least nine letters outlining Barclay’s unsuitability as an MP.”
And for more on the involvement of key National board member Glenda Hughes, see Bernard Hickey’s Hughes stonewalls Dickson questions. This report from the National Party’s weekend conference, also tells of how Barclay’s retirement was dealt with: “Retiring MPs were welcomed onto the stage to receive a gift from English. Barclay was not present and when his name was read out, he was the only one who was not applauded by the conference.”
The division between Barclay’s supporters and opponents in Clutha-Southland also seems to be replicated in the wider party and caucus – and today Richard Harman explains: “There is considerable sympathy for Barclay both within the caucus and around the party board table where some people were familiar with the persistent series of allegations levelled against him by the so-called ‘evil six’ group of Clutha-Southland party members who opposed him being the MP. That group is said to have been close to English when he was the Clutha-Southland MP” – see: The Barclay issue unravels – attention turns to English.
Also writing about these divisions, Rob Hosking says, “At an electorate level, there is clearly a divided Clutha-Southland party organisation, and some of this division is symbolic of a wider division within the National Party. You can characterise it in crude terms as the division between Queenstown and Dipton: between the wealthy and somewhat flashy new arrivals into the district and the more traditionalist farmers and rural service parts of the National Party coalition” – see: Nats’ internal scars could bite worse than Barclay.
And there’s another “Dirty Politics” dimension to these divisions, with supporters of Barclay tending to be close to the Judith Collins faction in caucus. Unsurprisingly, then, Cameron Slater has been blogging in Barclay’s favour and against Bill English. As Mike Williams says, at the time that Barclay’s scandal started unfolding, “The National Party factions were by this time leaking like sieves, as anyone who consults the Whale Oil blog will discover” – see: Tough week for two political leaders.
If you do consult Cameron Slater’s blog today, you will find posts like HDPA on the Bill’s balls up. In this post, Slater aims squarely at the Prime Minister: “It’s not over yet. There is disquiet amongst the backbench, serious disquiet. Ministers are also speaking in hushed tones, and these are ministers you’d never have thought would speak against the leadership so wedded they were to John Key and then to Bill English. Bill English has lost control of his caucus, with many thinking that if he is prepared to get involved in local electorate petty grievances and let his personal animosity cloud his thinking then perhaps he shouldn’t really be leader much less Prime Minister. The rumblings are there, they will spill over if this ends up before the Privileges Committee. The fact that Bill English can’t shut up, and every time he opens his gob he adds more intrigue suggests his time might be up one of the other. The media smell blood, and they know Bill is lying. It is not going to end well.”
Finally, for satire on the scandal, see Steve Braunias’ Secret Diary of Todd Barclay.
Today’s content
 
All items are contained in the attached PDF. Below are the links to the items online.
Todd Barclay scandal
Lizzie Marvelly (Herald):… for whom the clanger tolls
Steve Braunias (Herald): Secret Diary of Todd Barclay
Melanie Reid (Newswire): Barclay affair: What the board knew
Paul Little (Herald): The dark arts are still with us
Kerre McIvor (Herald): Under a mountain of shame
Heather du Plessis-Allan (Herald): ‘This rot goes right to the top’
Chris Keall (NBR): Memo to Bill: zip it
Bernard Hickey (Newsroom): Hughes stonewalls Dickson questions
Mike Williams (Hawke’s Bay Today): Tough week for two political leaders
Tracy Watkins (Stuff): One all on the political score card
Michael Reddell (Croaking Cassandra): Leadership and accountability
No Right Turn: Pull the other one
National Party conference
Bernard Hickey (Newsroom): PM dangles vague tax cut carrot
Felix Marwick and Gia Garrick (Newstalk ZB): Nationals’ tax cut pledge ’empty promises’ – Labour
Ella Prendergast (Newshub): Bill English joins Snapchat
Liam Hehir (Kiwiblog): Volunteers
Labour’s campaign for change scandal
Pete George (Your NZ): More on Labour’s intern scheme
Pete George (Your NZ): Labour policy coup attempt?
ODT: Editorial – Lacking leadership
Lizzie Marvelly (Villainesse): Marae are not slums. Interns are not slaves.
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): A complaint to the Speaker
Pete George: The McCarten risk
Steven Cowan (Against the current): The curious politics of Martyn Bradbury
NZ First
Greens
Election
Dave Armstrong (Dominion Post): Bill screws up and Andrew runs to help
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): How about door knocking?
Pete George (Your NZ): Morgan/TOP touring the south
David Farrar (Curia): Roy Morgan poll June 2017
Tim Murphy (Newsroom): The Sure Things: Erica Stanford
Media
Mark Jennings (Newsroom): Journalism loses a true hero
Martin van Beynen (Press): The age of umbrage weakens us all
Foreign Affairs
Other
Rodney Hide (NBR): ‘Big data’ won’t save state’s health system (paywalled)
Nevil Gibson (NBR): Inequality myths hide poverty trap (paywalled)
Russell Brown (Matters of substance): The frustrating politics of drug reform
]]>

NZ law student takes government to court over climate policy ‘failure’

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Hamilton law student Sarah Thomson speaking about her court case against the NZ government. Video: Greenpeace NZ

A New Zealand law student is battling the country’s government in court today over an alleged “failure” to properly address climate change, reports Greenpeace.

A win could potentially mean the government would be forced to go back to the drawing board and come up with more ambitious climate targets.

Along with similar lawsuits, it will set a bar for the type of action that developed countries must take to prevent dangerous climate change.

Sarah Thomson, 26, claims that as a developed country, New Zealand has an obligation under the Paris Agreement to set a target in line with the scientific consensus.

“So far the New Zealand government has shirked its responsibilities, set unambitious and irrational targets, and justified it all by saying we’re too small to make a difference,” she says.

“Climate change is a global issue affecting us here and now, and we all have a responsibility to act. Every year we’re experiencing more extreme weather events, including cyclones, droughts and floods, which are leaving entire communities devastated.

-Partners-

“I’m young and I’m terrified of a time when I might have to look my kids in the eye and explain to them how we let this happen.”

Inspired by global litigation
Thomson decided to launch the lawsuit after being inspired by global climate change litigation, including the 900 Dutch citizens who filed a case against the Dutch government, and a US case where 21 kids are taking on the Federal government and fossil fuel companies.

The litigation is the first of its kind in New Zealand and will be heard over the course of three days, starting from today, in the Wellington High Court. The outcome of the case is not likely to be known for several months.

Greenpeace New Zealand has helped organise a public mobilisation in support of Thomson, which is taking place this morning on the steps of the court.

The case has the backing of several world-renowned climate change experts, including the “father of climate change awareness”, former NASA researcher, James Hansen, who is a witness for the case.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) author Dr James Renwick will also be giving evidence.

One of the targets under review is New Zealand’s Paris Agreement commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 11 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. The lawsuit will ask the Minister for Climate Change Issues, currently Paula Bennett, to justify the way in which this target was set.

In her preliminary statement of defence, Bennett has denied that the New Zealand government needs to set a target that strengthens the global response to climate change to hold warming to “well below” 2C, with an aim of 1.5C, as stipulated by the Paris Agreement.

Lawyer Dennis van Berkel, who successfully argued the Dutch climate litigation case in 2015 setting a global precedent, said he would be watching what happens in New Zealand with keen interest.

“The Dutch case proves that all governments have a legal duty to protect their citizens against climate change by doing their part to lower emissions,” he said.

“Given the notoriously inadequate climate policies of New Zealand, this case may lead to the same conclusion. Global climate change litigation is growing, and all eyes are now on this hearing in this very important case.”

New Zealand has the second-highest level of emissions per GDP unit in the OECD and the fifth-highest emissions per capita.

A recent Greenhouse Gas Inventory report confirmed that as of 2015, net emissions have increased by 63.6 percent since 1990.

The New Zealand climate case is one of the many people-powered legal actions taking place around the world related to climate change.

These include actions initiated by frontline communities in the Philippines, senior women in Switzerland, indigenous peoples in Canada, farmers from Peru and Pakistan, youth in Norway, Pakistan, Uganda, and the United States, and individuals and NGOs in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Sweden.

In each of these cases, people are using the power of the law because governments and fossil fuel companies are failing to protect and to respect human rights to a safe, stable climate and healthy environment.

]]>

More than 100 PNG border soldiers from Papua frontier for polls

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

PNG border patrol soldiers … drafted for elections security duty. Image: EMTV News

Pacific Media Centre Newsdesk

The Joint Security Operation in Papua New Guinea’s Western Province will see more than 100 Defence Force troops assisting in the two-week general election that began on Saturday.

“These soldiers will come from the Weam Border operations of Western Province,” Western Province Elections Manager Max Paul said yesterday, reports EMTV News.

The Weam Border straddles the frontier between the Indonesian province of Papua and Papua New Guinea.

The rolling elections go into the third day this morning.

“We have over 100 polling teams,” Paul said.

Polling materials for the province were ready with most having been delivered by air and dinghy through the many river systems in the province.

-Partners-

“There has been little security concerns during the campaign period, and we hope that this will continue throughout the polling and counting days,” Paul said.

The three electorates in the province are North Fly Open, Middle Fly Open, and South Fly Open.

]]>

Annie Goldson talks to RNZ’s Sunday on the Kim Dotcom doco

]]>
Evening Report
Evening Report
Annie Goldson talks to RNZ’s Sunday on the Kim Dotcom doco
Loading
/

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Kim Dotcom … the “most wanted man online”. Image: Still from the documentary Caught in the Web

Pacific Media Watch Newsdesk

Kim Dotcom: Caught in the Web is the new film by award-winning documentary maker Annie Goldson and Alex Behse.

Three years in the making, and part-funded by the New Zealand Film Commission, the film tracks the controversial story of Kim Dotcom, who Dr Goldson, a professor in media and communication at the University of Auckland, got to know throughout the process.

She talks to RNZ Sunday’s Wallace Chapman about making the documentary, the Kim Dotcom story, internet surveillance, independent film making in New Zealand and the polarised issues around corporate copyright and internet “piracy”.

http://podcast.radionz.co.nz/sun/sun-20170625-1005-annie_goldson_the_kim_dotcom_movie-128.mp3


Synopsis:

The larger-than-life story of Kim Dotcom, the “most wanted man online”, is extraordinary enough, but the battle between Dotcom and the US Government and entertainment industry, being fought in New Zealand, is one that goes to the heart of ownership, privacy and piracy in the digital age. Three years in the making, this independent film chronicles a spectacular moment in global online history, dubbed the “largest copyright case” ever and the truth about what happened.

Screening at next month’s NZ International Film Festival

]]>

Rights groups condemn ‘cowardly censorship’ bid over Al Jazeera

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Pacific Media Watch

Press freedom and human rights advocates, journalists and social media users have condemned a demand by Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries to shut Al Jazeera television network and other media outlets in Qatar.

The Arab states reportedly issued a 13-point list on Friday, demanding the closure of all news outlets that it funds, directly and indirectly, including Arabi21, Rassd, Al Araby Al Jadeed, Mekameleen and Middle East Eye.

“We are really worried about the implication and consequences of such requirements if they will ever be implemented,” said Alexandra El Khazen, head of Middle East and North Africa desk at Reporters Without Borders, a non-profit organisation promoting press freedom.

Speaking to Al Jazeera from Paris, Khazen said: “We are against any kind of censorship and measures that could threaten the diversity in the Arab media landscape and pluralism, for instance.

“The Arabic media landscape should make room and accept the broadest range of viewpoints instead of adopting repressive measures against alternative viewpoints that are found to be critical of some governments.”

Khazen also expressed concern over the impact of the demands on the employees of the mentioned media outlets.

-Partners-

“Some of them may come under pressure to resign or to choose to do so to be aligned with the policy of their country, so we are currently investigating this,” she said.

Sarah Leah Whitson, executive director of the Middle East and North Africa Division at Human Rights Watch, called the Saudi-led bloc’s demand “absurd”.

“This is just an attempted expansion of the cowardly censorship they have inflicted on their own citizens, but it will fail,” she said.

‘Monstrous request’
Tim Dawson, president of the UK’s National Union of Journalists, expressed his “absolute horror” in reaction to what he called a “monstrous request” and urged the Saudi government to withdraw the demands.

The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) also condemned “the use of news outlets as a bargaining chip” and “urged all countries involved in this dispute to stop holding media hostage” to political differences.

“The Gulf region needs a vibrant free press and news outlets based there must be allowed to report freely,” said Joel Simon, the executive director of CPJ.

Meanwhile, The Guardian criticised the efforts to silence Al Jazeera as “wrong” and “ridiculous”.

“The attack on Al Jazeera is part of an assault on free speech to subvert the impact of old and new media in the Arab world. It should be condemned and resisted,” the UK-based newspaper said in an editorial.
Al Jazeera’s reaction

“We are stunned by the demand to close Al Jazeera,” Giles Trendle, the acting managing director of Al Jazeera English, said.

“Of course there has been talk about it in the past but it is still a great shock and surprise to actually see it in writing. It’s as absurd as it would be for Germany to demand Britain close the BBC.”

Trendle said Al Jazeera was going to continue its “editorial mission of covering the world news in a fair and balanced way”.

“We call on all governments to respect media freedom. We hope other media organisations will support our call to defend media freedom,” he added.

Roots in Arab Spring
Trendle said the roots of the demand to close Al Jazeera went back to 2011 and the Arab Spring.

“At that time, Al Jazeera was covering the dreams and the aspirations of a new generation of people. We provided the platform for the voice of the man and the woman in the Arab streets. We were covering those protests and we were providing a diversity of viewpoints. We were really the voice of the voiceless. I think there are some regimes in the region that don’t appreciate that diversity of views. I think that’s the reason for what’s going on here.”

Yaser Abuhilalah, director of Al Jazeera Arabic, called the demand to shut Al Jazeera a crime violating freedom of speech.

“I am against demands to close any media outlet, because it is a crime, a violation of basic human rights to freedom of speech,” Abuhilalah told Sputnik.

“If Al Jazeera violated something, anyone could sue it – in a Qatari court or in [a court of] any other country, it is the legitimate right of every person harmed by the media. But the demand to close [Al Jazeera] is a crime.”

Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain and Egypt severed relations with Qatar on June 5, accusing it of supporting “terrorism”. Qatar has denied the allegation.

Qatar’s Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani has said that Al Jazeera Media Network was an “internal affair” and there would be no discussion about the fate of the Doha-based broadcaster amid the Gulf crisis.

Curbing of citizens
To stem the flow of negative reactions, Saudi Arabia, UAE and Bahrain took steps to curb their citizens from expressing opinions that opposed their policies.

The UAE announced that any objections to the UAE’s strict measures against the government of Qatar or expression of sympathy with Qatar would be a crime punishable by a prison sentence of 3-15 years and a fine of no less than US$136,000 (500,000AED), whether on a social media platform or via any written or spoken medium.

The criminalisation of sympathy with Qatar was implemented in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain with slight differences in the length of prison sentences and size of fines.

Khazen said the decision to punish citizens was a “huge violation of freedom of speech and information that could have serious implications”.

Al Jazeera reporters have often come under fire, with Egypt imprisoning Arabic reporter Mahmoud Hussein, who has been in jail for 185 days for “disseminating false news and receiving monetary funds from foreign authorities in order to defame the state’s reputation”.

Al Jazeera’s Baher Mohamed and Mohamed Fahmy spent 437 days in jail before being released. Australian journalist Peter Greste spent more than a year in prison in Egypt.

Al Jazeera is the only free-to-air global news channel available on New Zealand’s Freeview platform.

]]>

Voting gets under way in PNG national elections

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Voting begins in the Papua New Guinea general election today. Image: Loop PNG

Papua New Guineans began voting today in the two-week-long rolling ballot at different polling places across the country.

The elections Media Centre was opened yesterday by Electoral Commissioner Patilias Gamato.

It is located at the Electoral Headquarters in the capital of Port Moresby. The centre will function as an information hub for accredited journalists throughout the polling and counting period, reports EMTV News.

It will be operational from today until July 25.

Commissioner Gamato said it was the main instrument for the PNGEC to communicate and share election related information and counting results.

As Prime Minister Peter O’Neill wrapped up his election campaign yesterday by visiting remote villages in the Ialibu-Pangia district of his Southern Highlands province, his ruling People’s National Congress (PNC) faced a third serious disruption, this time in the Simbu provincial capital of Kundiawa.

Incumbent Governor Noah Kool, who is also a PNC candidate, was pelted with stones by rival supporters in the final election rally meeting in the town, reports Loop PNG.

-Partners-

He was taken to hospital and treated for minor abrasions and lacerations to the head.

Kundiawa has one-day polling on Monday.

Women standing in the current election number 165 out of the total 3332 candidates contesting 111 seats in the National Parliament.

]]>

PMC to host visiting Pacific exchange student journalists

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

University of the South Pacific’s Linda Filiai filming in the Fiji National Sports Stadium … “once in a lifetime” opportunity. Image: PCF

Pacific Media Watch News Desk

The Pacific Media Centre will host three student journalists on Monday in the opening session of a two-week attachment media programme sponsored and organised by the Auckland-based Pacific Cooperation Foundation.

Students Linda Filiai and Shivika Mala, who were editors of University of the South Pacific’s award-winning student journalist newspaper Wansolwara, will be in New Zealand for two weeks, working with several media organisations to enhance their journalism skills, reports USP News.

USP’s Shivika Mala … “I love listening to people’s stories.” Image: PCF

They expect to be joined by Joshua Kirihua of PNG’s Divine Word University and Joshua Lafoai of the National University of Samoa journalism school.

This is a “once in a lifetime” opportunity, says Filiai.

“I am very proud to be part of this media internship. It will be an opportunity to develop a network with professional journalists, exchange ideas and to learn from one another.”

Joshua Kirihua of Papua New Guinea’s Divine Word University. Image: PCF

Mala says she applied for the internship in the hope of broadening her knowledge and skills and experience of how the New Zealand media industry works.

-Partners-

“I love listening to people’s stories because what may affect them, may affect us as well,” she says.

The pair say “this will further develop our skills, which will be helpful when we start work next year”.

Striking partnerships
Dr Shailendra Singh, coordinator of USP Journalism, says the internship is the outcome of efforts to strike partnerships and strategic alliances with organisations to help broaden student experiences and learning.

He says Mala and Filiai are top students who deserve the award.

Last year, Mala won the Fiji Times Award for the Best News Reporter while Filiai scooped the Communications Fiji Limited Best Radio Student Award.

Brandon Ulfsby of NZ’s Auckland University of Technology. Image: PCF

Two New Zealand students will be going to the Pacific Islands, including AUT’s Brandon Ulfsby, who is off to Samoa on Sunday.

Next month, on his return to New Zealand, Ulfsby and a fellow New Zealand Pasifika student journalist at AUT, Hele Ikimotu, will embark on a media internship with the NZ Institute for Pacific Research organised by the PMC.

Last year, former Wansolwara editor Sonal Singh was selected to take part in the internship.

Pacific Media Centre director Professor David Robie says he is pleased that the PMC has been able to give support to the initiative project since the beginning.

“For three years in a row we have had AUT Pacific student journalists selected for this exchange and it demonstrates the quality of our students,” he says.

On Monday, the exchange students will visit AUT’s state-of-the-art television studios, media centre and the PMC. They will also feature on the PMC’s weekly radio programme Southern Cross on Radio 95bFM.

]]>

40 years of PNG independence – ‘why are our women still dying?’

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Gulf Regional candidate, Ruben Giusu (right) refuses to sit on the chair made for him by the people but instead carries a young boy on it. The PNG elections begin tomorrow. Image: Loop PNG

By Julianna Waeda in Kerema, Papua New Guinea

Although linked by road to Papua New Guinea’s capital of Port Moresby and Waigani, Gulf province continues to be the least developed in the country and something has to be done about it.

Gulf Regional candidate Ruben Giusu in the PNG general election starting tomorrow says Gulf province out of all the provinces in the country should be well developed by now.

But, he says, successive governors have continued to neglect the province because of the mismanagement of funds.

Running under the Pangu Pati ticket, Giusu told the people of Kikori and Baimuru where he spent eight days living among the people and hearing their stories.

“We’ve had over 40 years of independence, so why are our women still dying in these rural areas because of lack of better health services?” he asked.

“The stories I heard are heart wrenching. And this is a province that is linked to the nation’s capital and Waigani by road.”

-Partners-

Police officer Giusu has served as the former provincial police commander in Gulf province.

Greater benefits promised
He also said that the landowners in resource areas had been promised greater benefits over the years but still nothing had been done to make that a reality.

Giusu said that if elected he would ensure that proper land vetting was done for resource landowners, schools were built to keep its human resource in the province, local SMEs were supported, rural health clinics and airstrips were back up and running, local farmers had access to markets and women in the province were supported and given a voice.

“I want to go in and clean up the system and ensure that the people benefit, especially the landowners and the people living in the rural areas of Gulf. We can’t talk about big things when the basics are not there.

“We can’t keep making the same promises every five years, these are people’s livelihood we are talking about. The province and its people need to feel and see the change in their lives,” he said.

Voting begins in PNG’s 2017 national election tomorrow and closes July 8 with 165 women among a total of 3332 candidates contesting the 111 seats in the National Parliament.

]]>

Bryce Edwards Analysis: Todd Barclay’s downfall – who loses and why

]]>

Analysis by Dr Bryce Edwards: Todd Barclay’s downfall – who loses and why [caption id="attachment_14716" align="alignleft" width="300"] National Party MP Todd Barclay (pictured above) announced his resignation over illegal taping allegations.[/caption] The Todd Barclay scandal reminds the public why they distrust and sometimes despise politicians. Therefore, the biggest long-term impact of the scandal might be to contribute to a nascent anti-Establishment feeling within the New Zealand electorate. The convoluted story of what went on between Todd Barclay and his staff may prove to be a fleeting political scandal, as the news media and public move on to other issues. This is nicely summed up in two minutes by Mike Hosking in his video from yesterday: Is Barclay issue too beltway? Hosking believes the scandal is mostly only of interest to political obsessives and won’t impact on Bill English: “this won’t in the grand scheme of things damage him. This is the beltway part of the story – the fizz, the pop, the drama. It will be gone as quickly as it popped up… On balance this looks more beltway than a full-blown scandal.” Such a reading of the situation misses the fact that this scandal has plenty of ramifications that will resonate strongly with the public. Below are some significant lessons the public might learn from the rise and fall of Todd Barclay. 1: Distrust politicians The main observation voters are likely to take from the scandal is that politicians in general are dishonest. The public might not take an interest in every allegation, detail, and U-turn, but they will certainly see that the whole Barclay controversy revolves around allegations of deception and subterfuge – see the original story broken on Tuesday by Melanie Reid – see: Politicians, police, and the payout. Since then, there has been more apparent economy with the truth, and the overwhelming impression is of secrets and lies. Of course, the public already has a heightened distrust of politicians. In fact, this is one of the main drivers of politics throughout the world at the moment, including New Zealand. The New Zealand public’s view of politicians can only worsen after a scandal that merely confirms what many of us already assume – that politicians lie, and politics is a dirty game. No wonder voters are increasingly turned-off or turning to anti-politicians. The winner could, therefore, be Winston Peters and New Zealand First, who are positioning themselves – along with Gareth Morgan – as the anti-Establishment choice for voters (and non-voters) who want to “keep the bastards honest”. 2: Distrust the “political class” Todd Barclay has personified a particular breed of modern politician – the career politician. This is the type of politician who becomes an elected representative at a relatively young age, after working in associated areas of politics, such as for a party at Parliament. These politicians see themselves as having a life-long political career, rather than coming into politics following on from a career elsewhere where they have gathered real-life experience. The rise and fall of Barclay is likely to reinforce the questions being asked about the increasing number of MPs coming into politics without life experience outside of student associations, media jobs, the lobbying industry, and other areas close to politics. Some younger MPs could be unfairly tarnished by Barclay’s downfall – but a healthy scepticism might be created about the trend of bringing in new politicians whose only experience of working life is the Beehive bubble. The NBR’s Rob Hosking writes about this today, suggesting that “perhaps National needs to reconsider the rising tendency of using mostly young, former political staffers as candidates” – see: Lessons from the Barclay boilover (paywalled). Hosking argues that National has mistakenly joined other parties in this trend towards promoting young career politicians: “Historically, National has been reluctant to do this. It has been a useful point of differentiation between National and the country’s left-wing parties. Its MPs are not, unlike Labour and, to a lesser extent the Greens, just products of the university-union-political staff-MP sausage machine. For non-partisans, a big advantage is that National MPs have had a broader life experience. Those MPs who have come through that sausage machine – no matter which party they are – possess an extraordinarily narrow view of what is important in life and it means the country is less well governed.” For satire about Barclay’s youth, together with a plea for more experienced politicians, see Raybon Kan’s Note to Govt: Don’t hire till they’re past puberty. He makes a suggestion: “Let me throw this out there. I propose a new law: you can’t enter politics if you’re younger than 30. Below that age, you only get to enter Junior Politics… Adult stuff gets left to adult politicians. I want politicians who have lived a little.” Perhaps even the young might have some sympathy for this. After all, there is a certain irony that the type of behaviour that has been so often identified with turning off young voters, has been so clearly on display by Parliament’s youngest MP. We can expect the term “political class” to be used more and more in New Zealand. It’s a term used in other countries – not only about politicians but also the staff who work with them, such as spin doctors and researchers. This is because, these various careers are seen as overlapping. It’s the arrogance associated with the political class that is particularly galling for many of the public, and the gulf between the public and our politicians is widening. Todd Barclay has exhibited this sense of entitlement in spades – see Russell Brown’s Barclay and arrogance. Even the terms of the departure will anger many. He’s not resigning, but leaving Parliament when it suits him and his party – at the election. He will continue to receive a lucrative income, while possibly not doing much work – see David Fisher’s Todd Barclay and his $80,000 exit package from Parliament – but what will he do for the money? And the use of taxpayer funds to pay off Barclay’s former electorate office staffer will also resonate very negatively with many voters – see Sam Sachdeva’s Barclay payout raises questions over leader’s fund and Patrick Gower’s National owes the taxpayer for Todd Barclay’s hush money. 3: Distrust the Prime Minister Did he lie? Was he involved in a cover up? Those will be the questions that dog Bill English for some time yet. English certainly has a case to answer. Bernard Hickey explains: “The Prime Minister now faces some tough questions about why he took no action in early 2016 when he learned about the recorded conversations and why he accepted Barclay’s decision not to take questions from police. After all, English had agreed to take questions from police. Why would the MP at the centre of the allegations refuse to talk if he had nothing to hide? It seems extraordinary that English was prepared to accept the re-selection of Barclay as the MP of an electorate that is not only close to his heart – it’s his family home” – see: Bill English’s worst day as PM. In the same scathing column, Hickey explains why this is so bad for the PM’s reputation: “make no mistake, there has been a hit to English’s reputation as a straight-down-the-line politician who doesn’t prevaricate or fudge or suffer the same ‘brain fades’ as his predecessor.” This is elaborated upon by Tim Watkin: “This is a politician whose greatest asset is his fundamental decency. English doesn’t have the charisma, so he trades on judgment and decency. How will voters react to a PM who knows of potential illegal actions by one of his MPs, and hushes it up?” – see: Two bad decisions, one awful day for National. This loss of trust is significant according to Patrick Gower: “Bill English has faced his first political test – and failed. He’s looked shifty on the Todd Barclay issue and there is no question that his political mana has been damaged. He can recover, and it may blow over – but there is a question mark about whether he will have lost trust with some voters. Mr Barclay may be gone but so many questions remain about why Bill English did nothing until his involvement in the recording scandal became public” – see: Bill English has damaged his political mana. The fact that Bill English has been so reluctant to apologise over the issue will also not sit well with the public. Audrey Young comments: “The disturbing part about the events of this week at Parliament is the lack of contrition from English. Of course he is terribly sorry that it has come to this – Barclay’s premature retirement from politics. He and Barclay seem terribly sorry for themselves and their party. But English has failed to admit any wrongdoing or apologise for the way he handled things” – see: English ought to show more contrition. Young also points to the fact that English has been much less forthcoming about the issue than he has suggested: “He did not inform the police in order that the matter be investigated. He talked to police because they had come across his text to Stuart Davie in the course of its investigation. He then sat on the information and watched while Barclay deflected questions from media and more importantly Southland electors on an issue they had a right to know about, and did nothing to encourage Barclay to cooperate with the police investigation, which was dropped.” Similarly, Claire Trevett writes today that Bill English’s integrity was previously seen as a strong point: “In 2014, English held himself aloft from the slurry of Dirty Politics – and in fact even condemned the cynical behaviour it catalogued. He takes pride in his own integrity. So many were gobsmacked this week when it was revealed English was complicit in Barclay’s public comments by staying silent, denying any direct personal involvement, and believing the matter tidily dealt to by way of a settlement. English has claimed innocence, saying he spoke to the Police about it. But there is more than a taint of a cover up about it when it comes to the public – and that may chip at English’s own trust stores” – see: PM Bill English’s feet of Barclay. 4: Distrust the political parties Political parties in general – and National, in particular – might find their democratic credentials tarnished by this scandal. This is because much of this infighting and intrigue has occurred at the local level, rather than in Parliament. This is best conveyed in Sam Sachdeva and Melanie Reid’s article, Investigation underway into Barclay’s Clutha-Southland selection, which details the allegations of manipulation at the branch level. David Farrar argues Barclay’s local opponents in the National Party also come out of the scandal looking bad. He paints a picture of unprincipled National Party activists running a campaign against their own MP – see: About Todd Barclay. And there’s also been the suggestion of intimidation by senior party figures – actions which might even be crimes, given that they appear to have attempted to stop complaints about Barclay being made to the Police – see Andrew Geddis’ It’s not the crime, it’s the coverup, and Nicholas Jones’ Police take another look at Barclay secret recording investigation. 5: Distrust the Police The status of the Police will also be tarnished in many people’s minds due to their questionable role in investigating the allegations against Barclay. This is best explained by Audrey Young: “The police investigation took 10 months and was then closed. The police released documents to the Herald relating to the investigation under the Official Information Act but they redacted the text message sent by Bill English, which incriminated Todd Barclay, and they did not include the statement English made to them. Comparison have been made between the vigour of the police investigation in relation to John Key’s complaint over the teapot tapes, when he was accidentally taped by a cameraman with a radio mike, and the complaint by Barclay’s former electorate secretary Glenys Dickson that she had been taped” – see: Let me count the ways the Barclay scandal matters. This has angered some. For example, the No Right Turn blogger has complained that the Police too easily gave up on the investigation of Barclay when the MP refused to be interviewed as part of the investigation: “We now know that English told them that Barclay had recordings. The legal standard for obtaining a search warrant is reasonable grounds to suspect that an offence has been committed and that evidence of that offence will be found. That standard appears to have been met simply by Bill English’s statement to them. They’d certainly conclude that in any other case (and did in the case of Bradley Ambrose). So why didn’t they do so here? I think the answer is obvious: because the police don’t want to rock the boat or potentially endanger their funding. Faced with an allegation against the powerful, they grovelled to power rather than investigating it” – see: Grovelling to power. Finally, for the cartoonists views on the Barclay scandal, see my blog post, Cartoons about the fall of Todd Barclay. Today’s content All items are contained in the attached PDF. Below are the links to the items online. Todd Barclay Bernard Hickey (Newsroom): PM Bill English accused of cover-up over Barclay Audrey Young (Herald): English ought to show more contrition Barry Soper (Newstalk ZB): Bill English’s claims over Barclay affair a bit of a stretch Claire Trevett (Herald): PM Bill English’s feet of Barclay Benedict Collins (RNZ):PM’s opponents salt the Barclay wound Nicholas Jones (Herald): Focus on Prime Minister and police after Todd Barclay quits Richard Harman (Politik): How big is the Barclay damage?  Sam Sachdeva (Newsroom): Fall from grace for Baby of the House Herald Editorial: Barclay needed help from his leaders Raybon Kan (Herald): Note to Govt: Don’t hire till they’re past puberty Felix Marwick (Newstalk ZB): Barclay debacle: PM tried to ‘cover up’ scandal, opposition says Lloyd Burr and Matthew Hutching (Newshub): Barclay scandal good for NZ First – Winston Peters Patrick Gower (Newshub): Bill English has damaged his political mana Tracy Wakins (Stuff): MP Todd Barclay goes but PM Bill English still trying to find his footing David Fisher (Herald): Todd Barclay and his $80,000 exit package from Parliament – but what will he do for the money? Jane Patterson (RNZ): Barclay’s murky departure casts shadow on PM Newsroom: How Barclay’s career went up in smoke Isaac Davison (Herald): Opposition targets Prime Minister Bill English and police over Todd Barclay scandal TVNZ: Bill English says he’s ‘still unclear’ on Todd Barclay’s alleged secret taping, after disgraced MP stands down for upcoming election RNZ: Barclay controversy: PM accused of ‘cover up’ Emma Hurley (Newshub):Live updates: Todd Barclay to step down after secret recording scandal Eleanor Ainge Roy (Guardian): ‘Secret recordings’ scandal hits New Zealand prime minister months before election Stuff: Todd Barclay’s sister defends disgraced MP on Facebook Political integrity issues Gyles Beckford (RNZ): ‘Corruption is real in New Zealand, it’s happening Herald: Conflicts of interest on the rise in Australasia OASIS: GCSB Director wanted to be useful – offered spies to Groser Ann Webster (Audit Blog):Data and integrity Peter Adams (Dominion Post): Trust priceless when it comes to charities Jo Moir (Stuff): Winston Peters reveals failures by Fuji Xerox that went ignored by Government No Right Turn: Treasury and the OIA Employment Julie Haggie (Spinoff): The Pay Equity deal was supposed to be a big win for rest home workers. Now the government is going back on its word Nicholas McBride (Stuff): Mental health workers excluded from equal pay deal Ross Guest and Kirsten MacDonald (Conversation): What Australia can learn from the New Zealand retirement system Julia Shallcrass (Herald): Why aren’t more companies embracing diversity? Anna Loren (Stuff): Women hold female bosses to higher emotional standard than male bosses – study Next: The Green Party’s Metiria Turei on fixing New Zealand’s gender pay gap Health Ben Gray (Stuff): ACC is not broken: The legal fiction at the heart of the problem Nicholas McBride (Stuff): Thousands with mental health conditions stuck on benefit for years Jamie Small (Stuff): Labour promises mental health plan: Free GP visits, more nurses in schools Karen Brown (RNZ): Coleman grilled over Health Ministry review Stacey Kirk and Rachel Thomas (Stuff): State Services Commissioner defends embattled health official against ‘inappropriate’ attacks Rachel Thomas (Stuff): Contraceptives, education hailed as heroes as abortion rates lowest in 25 years David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Abortions down again Education and Training Hannah Martin (Stuff): National decline in the number of students attending school regularly, report shows Simon Collins (Herald): Minister issues ‘please explain’ after NCEA plagiarism praised as ‘excellence’ Michael Hayward (Stuff): Ministry of Education apologises to Canterbury schools after scathing Ombudsman report Kurt Bayer (Herald): Government’s shake-up of post-quake Canterbury schools mishandled, Chief Ombudsman finds RNZ: Chch school closures were a ‘bombshell’ – Ombudsman Eleanor Ainge Roy (Guardian): No classrooms, lessons or homework: New Zealand school where children are free to roam Madison Reidy (Stuff): Government announces $7m funding boost for apprentices Aimie Cronin (Listener): Class Captain: Nikki Kaye, New Zealand’s youngest female Minister of Education Simon Wilson (Spinoff): Chlöe and Jacinda go back to school Colin Craig v Rachel MacGregor Herald: Colin Craig weighing up legal options against MacGregor Anna Leask (Herald): Rachel MacGregor files lawsuit against Colin Craig Stuff: Rachel MacGregor counter-sues Colin Craig for defamation Housing Julia Wiener (Interest): We have tracked Labour’s housing policies over the last two elections; they haven’t changed as much as you’d think Willie Jackson (Daily Blog): Slumlord’s have to go Catherine Harris (Stuff): Trades group calls for better standards system following London fire Environment Rachel Stewart (Herald): Let’s have a ball and forget about blue ball Gerard Hutching (Stuff): Greens see fertile fields for cooperation with farmers Mitchell Alexander (Newshub): ‘It does make you think about life’: Labour’s Andrew Little talks about battle with cancer Election and democracy Mike Hosking (Herald): Here’s my election call Richard Harman (Politik): Labour Party volunteer workers rebel over living conditions David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Political donations No Right Turn: Our political parties are owned by the rich Oliver Hartwich (NZ Intitiative): Time for a New Zealand first Anne-Marie McDonald (Wanganui Chronicle): Hekia Parata supporting women candidates for National Peter McKenzie (Constitution for Aotearoa): Why a constitution alone is not enough Anthony Robins (Standard): Should The Left Do Authoritarian Populism Like The Right Does? Jo McKenzie-McLean (Stuff): Error misses off electors in Otago Regional Council by-election Economy Tom Pullar-Strecker (Stuff): Labour labels Government action on multinational tax ‘unambitious’ Andrea Black (Let’s talk about tax): No accounting for tax Fran O’Sullivan (Herald): Drama aplenty in stellar finance career Patrick O’Meara (RNZ): Alternative to investor-state dispute tribunals put forward Tina Morrison (Listener): The Maori economy is booming – just not for Ngapuhi Michael Reddell (Croaking Cassandra): The Secretary to the Treasury on productivity Police and justice RNZ: Labour calls for audit of police IT projects RNZ: Call for newspapers in prisons nationwide Herald: Crime ‘out of control’ in Whanganui claims Peters, but stats say otherwise Other Isaac Davison (Herald): Sue Bradford, the constant radical, on drugs, rape and suicide Michael Daly (Stuff): New Zealand and Australia tied in ninth place on social progress index Herald: New Zealand now 9th equal on world Social Progress Index Herald: Broadcaster leaving Radio New Zealand after 53 years Jono Galuszka (Manawatu Standard): Politicians divided over suggestion Palmerston North could take more refugees Herald: Aussies name NZ as their new ‘best friend’ as Uncle Sam’s allure fades Katie Kenny (Stuff): New Zealand existed before America started paying attention Tracy Hicks (Southland Times): We need a game changer, which is laid out in the regional development strategy Catherine Harris (Stuff): Cannabis could be sold by non-profits and funds fed back to community: Massey paper Audit Blog: Looking back over the last year … we’re not just about the numbers! John Drinnan (ZagZigger): Kiwi Magazines Maestro To Run Bauer Australasian Empire Brian Rudman (Herald): War breaks out over World War One memorial Harriet Gale (Spinoff): The third main: why is a $58m rail option being ignored while a $1.4 billion road rolls on? No Right Turn: Winston’s war with the Speaker Henrietta Bollinger (RNZ): Hey Nicky Wagner! Your words matter David Farrar (Kiwiblog): A great appointment ]]>

Bryce Edwards Analysis: Labour calls off the search for the missing million

]]>

Bryce Edwards Analysis: Labour calls off the search for the missing million
[caption id="attachment_13635" align="alignleft" width="150"] Dr Bryce Edwards.[/caption] Labour’s Campaign for Change has gone horribly wrong. As with the other scandal of the week, it’s a saga that appears to involve political deception, incompetence, and hypocrisy. But it also goes to prove just how fraught it is to try to mobilise the “missing million”.
Labour’s foreign youth internship scheme was meant to help foster a “youthquake”, or at least somehow mobilise a good part of the so-called “missing million” non-voters.
It was a smart objective – any success in such an endeavour could make a huge difference in getting Labour into government in three months’ time. But one of the many lessons from the debacle that sprung up yesterday is to reinforce the difficulty of that project. Alienated and youthful non-voters aren’t simply going to clamour aboard the Labour Party train just because 100 foreign students have come into the country to campaign. And given the apparent inadequate resourcing of this project – as well as a fair dose of deception – it was probably inevitably doomed.
The result was the expose published yesterday by Richard Harman – see: Labour Party volunteer workers rebel over living conditions.
[caption id="attachment_14757" align="aligncenter" width="360"] Matt McCarten in happier days photographed with then Labour leader David Cunliffe.[/caption]
According to Harman, “The students rebelled over their accommodation and their disappointment with what was supposed to be a high powered learning programme but which appears to be not much more than political campaign drudge work. Now party heavyweights have had to step in to rescue the programme and deal with the complaints from the students. The scheme, which required the students to work for free, was to involve lectures from Labour party heavyweights such as Helen Clark and Andrew Little.”
Exploitation and poor organisation
Labour’s programme has been widely condemned as exploitative and dishonest. Of course, many of those condemning it are Labour’s political opponents. Maori Party co-leader Marama Fox was fierce in her comments on Labour’s scheme: “That is slave labour, not free labour, and they should be ashamed of themselves” – see Sam Sachdeva’s Labour under fire over foreign student volunteer scheme.
Fox is also quoted saying that Labour had “duped” the foreign students: “We all need volunteers, we all need people to come and work on our campaigns, but we don’t do it by misleading them and putting them up in poor substandard accommodation”.
National’s campaign manager Steven Joyce has said: “If the allegations are correct, Labour has brought international students to New Zealand on false pretences, failed to look after them, and failed to meet their obligations to the students in the most basic way, while at the same time campaigning against exploitation of migrants.”
Labour’s apparent hypocrisy
All of this bad press is particularly harmful to Labour because it makes the party look hypocritical. And in particular, the message it sends to the public appears to be strongly at variance with some of the party’s core values and campaign policies.
Toby Manhire says: “It’s all made much worse by the way it so gruesomely dovetails with Labour’s recent chest thumping rhetoric on immigration, student visas, and shonky educational opportunities, not to mention the commitment to workers’ rights embedded in the party’s founding ideals, its philosophical DNA, that sort of thing” – see: ‘The whole team went rogue’: the gruesome political reality of Labour’s campaign for change.
Rightwing political commentator Matthew Hooton goes much further than this, saying the scandal contradicts Labour’s policy messages: “You have a major political party promising to offer people better houses, to cut down on immigration, to introduce higher minimum wages and to get rid of dodgy education courses and their own party is undermining all four of those by bringing in unpaid interns to substandard accommodation with the promise of courses that don’t even exist” – see Jason Walls’ Labour called out over ‘hypocritical’ student volunteer situation (paywalled).
In case you think that’s simply the view from the political right, see the No Right Turn blog post: The latest Labour muppetry. He says, “using foreign student volunteers to campaign against foreign students is simply hypocritical. And failing to treat your volunteers properly? That’s stupid as well as wrong.”
And, of course, the timing of the scandal is particularly unfortunate for Labour. Barry Soper explains: “Labour never lets the opportunity to shoot itself in the foot to be lost. Just when it had the National Party on the ropes over the Todd Barclay debacle, it jumps into the ring to self-flagellate” – see: Labour’s opponents are rubbing their hands with glee.
Another side to the story
Of course, there are always two sides to any story, and the Herald has published an account that paints a very different picture of life inside the Campaign for Change – see: US intern defends Labour’s ‘fellowship’ campaign programme from ‘sweatshop’ claims.
This article reports on the views of an anonymous American student: “She believed the complaints and leaks to the media were driven by one or two interns who had a beef with the programme. She claimed one was dropped from a leadership position on the programme after allegedly taking bottles of wine from Labour MP Jenny Salesa’s house after Salesa hosted a meal for them.” According to this account, the media had inaccurately portrayed what had gone on, and she disagreed with any notion of “sweatshop” conditions and “slave labour”.
And, one of the US students has blogged about their experience here, and it’s fairly positive – see: Jordan Pawlicki’s Extravagant Week One For the International Newbie.
Another very interesting account can be read in Auckland University student radio station bFM’s Exclusive transcript with Labour student intern.
Labour’s damage control appears dishonest
One of the most deceptive elements of both the Campaign for Change, and subsequent attempts by Labour at damage control, is the claim this wasn’t a Labour Party campaign. Matt McCarten had sold it publicly as “non-partisan”, which was scarcely believable given his roles at the top of the Labour Party in recent times. And other Labour figures continue to argue that Labour is simply coming in to clean up someone else’s mess, when it is clear this has been a Labour project from the start.
The involvement of Labour Party staffers is made apparent in the above bFM interview with one of the interns – who points to the various Labour people running the Labour camp. And in a blog post, David Farrar elaborates on who these staffers and officials are – see: Of course this was Labour’s scheme. Farrar says: “To argue this scheme was independent of Labour when it was called a Labour fellowship, and run by staff from the Leader’s Office and Labour field offices, plus a member of Labour’s National Council is beyond credibility.”
And today Newshub has revealed further internal organising details from the campaign, which suggest that, not only was Labour centrally involved, a number of trade unions were being asked to contribute funding – see: Union money behind Labour’s botched intern scheme.
In fact, could the Labour Party be even more responsible for the fiasco than they are leading us to believe? That seems to be the argument made by leftwing blogger and activist Martyn Bradbury, who had been involved with the campaign. He suggests it was actually the Labour Party leadership that killed off the campaign, because they feared it was too leftwing – see: Why the Labour Party Student Intern ‘scandal’ is a smear.
Here’s Bradbury’s argument: “The campaigns focus was engagement and it had Labour Party sign off and Union buy in. What happened however was Labour Party HQ Wellington had become panicked by how big the Campaign had become and despite green lighting it started dragging their feet until the thing fell over. A whispering campaign targeting the funders of this campaign strangled off money because Labour Party HQ Wellington’s preference is to win over voters who are existing voters because the policy platform doesn’t have to be particularly radical for that. What Labour didn’t want was a huge campaign to the Left of Labour pressuring them for a Corbyn or Sanders platform.”
Bradbury concludes that “the real story is Labour’s fear of a courageous left wing platform. Blaming Matt McCarten and leaving him to twist in the wind is expected but it certainly isn’t honourable.”
Futile campaigning for the youthquake
Martyn Bradbury’s blog post explains how the Campaign for Change was an attempt to emulate some of the youth politics success recently seen in the US and UK: “The plan to use international students who had worked on campaigns like Jeremy Corbyn’s and Bernie Sander’s were going to be matched by domestic volunteers who were going to target 60 000 Aucklander’s who had enrolled to vote but hadn’t voted and 60 000 Aucklander’s who hadn’t enrolled at all.”
Essentially the whole project has constituted a short-cut attempt to mobilise a dormant part of the electorate. The problem is that party officials cannot simply artificially engineer such phenomena. You can’t just use your will and some simple tricks to magic up an exciting wave of enthusiasm for the parties of the left.
The British election youthquake – and other popular mobilisations – have been more organic. They’ve been genuine responses by the public to what they see as exciting and authentic leadership and bold programmes for change. And, here in New Zealand, that key ingredient is currently missing. So, yes, Labour is trying to emulate what British Labour succeeded in doing, but without the same conditions here, such an endeavour is always going to be more fraught.
This is the point I made last Friday evening when I went on TV3’s The Project. arguing that we’re unlikely to see a youthquake here – see: Academic predicts a ‘youth yawn’ in New Zealand election.
Unless there is some sort of local version of Jeremy Corbyn or Bernie Sanders, the New Zealand Labour Party can run as many gimmicks, tricks or engineered campaigns as it wants, but it’s unlikely to create the buzz that comes from a real movement. And in lieu of that, any attempts to create one will probably lead to perverse outcomes, such as seen this week.
As leftwing blogger Steven Cowan has said, “The fact that Labour had to recruit workers from overseas, namely unsuspecting students, to work for it only goes to highlight the lack of local enthusiasm for Andrew Little’s dull and cautious Labour Party” – see: Labour exposed exploiting overseas students.
Finally, to see what the various partisans across the political spectrum are saying about this scandal on the twittersphere, see my blog post, Top tweets about Labour’s foreign student intern scandal.
Today’s content
 
All items are contained in the attached PDF. Below are the links to the items online.
Todd Barclay
Bronwyn Hayward (Stuff): Truth, lies, and democracy
Rob Hosking (NBR): Lessons from the Barclay boilover (paywalled)
Toby Manhire (Herald): Rumble from the Gore jungle
Matthew Hooton (NBR): The first snowflake melts (paywalled)
Gordon Campbell (Scoop): On the fallout from the Barclay tape
Mike Smith (Standard): Follow the money
Stacey Kirk and Henry Cooke (Stuff): Police look to make decision on Todd Barclay next week
Greg Presland (The Standard): Bill English is no John Key
Pete George (Your NZ): Peters versus English on Barclay
Pete Burdon (Media Training): Barclay issue could dilute Labour message
Labour’s campaign for change
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Of course this was Labour’s scheme
Steven Cowan (Against the current): Labour exposed exploiting overseas students
Ele Ludemann (Homepaddock): What about the workers?
Pete George (Your NZ): Funding of Labour’s intern scheme
Health
Catherine Groenestein (Taranaki Daily News): Funding changes leave health boards scrambling to reconfigure budgets
Farming and environment
No Right Turn: Boo hoo
Justice and police
Shane Cowlishaw (Newsroom): Too many guns, not enough cops
Foreign affairs and trade
Richard Harman (Politik): How about a bit of naive Kiwi optimism
Gerald McGhie (Dominion Post): Engage over North Korea, don’t dismiss
Election
Ben Peterson (Daily Blog): Ideas arent enough
Tim Murphy (Newsroom): The Sure Things: Chris Penk
Dene Mackenzie (ODT): Morgan impresses Dunedin audience
Other
John Drinnan (Herald): A big future for small stories?
Rosemary McLeod (Dominion Post): London’s fire sprang from landlord logic
Liz Minchin and Veronika Meduna (The Conversation): New Zealand joins a growing global Conversation
The Standard: Oil and Water Mix
]]>

Unprecedented outpouring of grief at funeral for Vanuatu president

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Following a funeral service in the Parliamentary rotunda, beloved and admired President Baldwin Lonsdale was farewelled by a massive crowd lining the route to the airport. Image: Dan McGarry/Vanuatu Daily Post

By Dan McGarry in Port Vila

Vanuatu has never seen an outpouring of sorrow and admiration such as it witnessed yesterday.

Many alive today may not see another in their lifetime.

Heads of state from Fiji, New Zealand and Australia all attended the state funeral, which was held in the Parliamentary rotunda, commonly known as the “pig’s tusk” because of its spiral architecture.

They were joined by dignitaries from China, the United States of America, Tonga and elsewhere.

The service for President Baldwin Lonsdale, who died early last Saturday morning, was offered by the Bishop of Melanesia — out of deference to Rev Lonsdale’s status as a clergyman in the Anglican church.

In front of a solemn gathering that included Vanuatu’s living former Presidents, Prime Minister Charlot Salwai, his ministers and MPs.

-Partners-

Opposition Leader Ishmael Kalsakau and hundreds of people from all walks of life, the choir opened the service with a moving musical rendition of the 23rd Psalm.

Outside Parliament, thousands of school children and members of the public lined the road, waiting for the cortege that would escort the body of the late President to the airport, where it would be flown to the Banks islands, his home.

Festooned with flowers
Following the service, Rev Lonsale’s casket was loaded onto the back of a flatbed truck festooned with flowers and the Vanuatu flag. It led a kilometre-long procession of hundreds of vehicles through the main streets of Port Vila.

The road was carpeted with flowers all along the procession route. In the Manples area, the road was lined with brightly coloured calicos. As the procession passed, the market vendors sang a song in the Tongoan language, a moving tribute to one of the most widely respected figures in Vanuatu since Father Walter Lini, the country’s first Prime Minister.

It is difficult to accurately estimate the number of people who lined the roughly six-kilometre long route, but there has been no similar public gathering in living memory.

This unprecedented display of grief and admiration was not limited to Vanuatu alone. In solidarity with this nation, flags flew at half mast yesterday in Australia, New Zealand and in other locations throughout the Pacific Islands.

The body was flown to the Banks islands yesterday, and the President will be mourned by the people of Torba province today. His body will be laid to rest in Sola, Vanua Lava tomorrow.

Dan McGarry is media director for the Vanuatu Daily Post group.

President Baldwin’s coffin draped with the Vanuatu flag at the funeral in Port Vila yesterday. Image: Selwyn Leodoro/FB
]]>

‘Anticipation, excitement’ sweep PNG as election polling looms

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Papua New Guinea gears up for election polling this weekend. Image: Development Policy Centre

Pacific Media Centre News Desk

Polling in Papua New Guinea’s 2017 national election begins this weekend.

On Saturday, voters will take to the polling booths after a six-week campaign which began on April 24.

“Anticipation” and “excitement” is the current general feeling, Papua New Guinean citizen and AUT doctoral candidate Stephanie Sageo-Tupungu told 95bFM’s weekly Southern Cross radio programme on Monday.

“Everyone is now thinking about who they’re going to vote for, how they’re going to go about it.”

But as voting looms, however, the effectiveness of candidates’ campaigns remains unclear due to an apparent lack of funding.

As ABC’s PNG correspondent Eric Tlozek reported, the 2017 election campaign has been “relatively quiet” due to an “economic slump”.

-Partners-

Tlozek said this economic downturn meant candidates did not have the money to “splash out” on advertising.

“There is simply no money and sometimes no economic justification,” Tlozek said.

Ben Micah of the People’s Progress Party – part of an opposition coalition with Kerenga Kua of the PNG National Party, Patrick Pruaitch of the National Alliance and former Prime Minister Sir Mekere Morauta – told Pacific Beat: “The major problem confronting our country is the fact the government is broke.”

Current government ‘plague’
Micah likened the shortage of funds, issues of maladministration and corruption to a “plague”.

Sageo-Tapungu told Asia Pacific Report “these are some common issues that the candidates are campaigning on.”

Candidates in the 2017 national election are also promising to improve infrastructure – roads, bridges – in bringing services to remote communities, solve land grabbing issues and ease current violence surrounding settlements and ethnicity, she said.

This comes in the wake of Election Commissioner Patilias Gamato calling for “free and fair” elections:

“Our theme for 2017 — “Your Choice Protect our Democracy” — speaks volumes and I urge every citizen of this country to uphold the rule of law. The decision we make today affects our future and the future of our children’s children. I urge every citizen to refrain from illegal conduct and allow for a free and fair election.”

However, gender equality has also been a focus this election and a source of hope for many in PNG surrounding equal rights.

Loop PNG reported the number of female candidates standing in the current election comprised 165 of the total 3332 candidates.

Female representation question
The only province that did not register a female candidate was West New Britain, Loop PNG said.

Papua New Guinea’s 2017 national elections have seen a rise in female candidates compared to the 135 in 2012, which saw only three female candidates succeed – Eastern Highlands governor Julie Soso, Sohe MP Delilah Gore and Lae MP Loujaya Kouja.

Stephanie’s husband, Kenneth Sageo-Tupungu, told Southern Cross:

“There’s been a rise in women’s numbers, candidates, and this has in a way really changed the dynamic of the game itself and this has really challenged the existing status quo of elections and campaigns.”

However, Stephanie Sageo-Tupungu questioned whether equal participation would become a reality.

“For female representation in politics in PNG for this year, it’s encouraging to see about 165 contesting this election — that’s quite a number compared to the past years and they have a support base.

“We hope to see them be successful, but the thing is, it’s a male game in PNG … Male politicians support women’s participation in theory. In practice, that is to be seen as a reality.”

Voting in PNG’s 2017 national election on Saturday and closes July 8.

]]>

New governance watchdog PNGi exposes O’Neill’s business networks

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Masthead today from the PNGi Central website. Image: PMW

Pacific Media Watch News Desk

PNGi is set to revolutionise governance in Papua New Guinea by cracking open the secrets of the rich and powerful and exposing them to public view.

Using the latest digital technologies, PNGi aims to investigate, analyse and expose the often hidden and opaque systems standing behind the abuse of political and economic power.

Its two flagship resources are the PNGi Portal and PNGi Central websites,

They have been established and are sustained by an informal network of academics, activists and journalists involved in researching and writing about current issues in Papua New Guinea.

“In accordance with a robust risk assessment process, in some instances, contributors are protected by publishing their work anonymously,” said PNGi in a response to a query from Pacific Media Watch.

“However, all published material has been peer-reviewed, and is rigorously referenced, using freely accessible documentary sources. This allows anyone to verify each factual claim made.”

-Partners-

The PNGi Portal is an on-line database of governance reporting. It collates documents produced by institutions like the Ombudsman Commission, Auditor General and Public Accounts Committee and makes them available to the public through a powerful search engine.

The public can now search and cross-match reports, to uncover serial misconduct by target individuals or entities.

The database is a major addition to due diligence in Papua New Guinea. It will add value to the work of journalists, researchers, students, public officials, oversight agencies, citizens and responsible corporate actors.

Sitting alongside the portal is PNGi Central, a reporting platform that will use a range of formats to communicate the results of research into:

— the discrete networks that lie at the heart of the country’s economic and political power, and which are mired in allegations of improper and illicit conduct;

— the institutional and legal mechanisms the networks use;

— common transaction patterns; and

— the broader policy and legal factors that are permissive of improper or illegal activities.

PNGi Central represents the most sophisticated reporting effort yet in the region, to speak truth to power through rigorous research, accessible to the public through digestible mechanisms ranging from feature investigations, through to podcasts, power profiles and court reports.

O’Neill’s business network
To launch the new websites and illustrate PNGi’s research capabilities, PNGi Central has published a report into the business network of current Prime Minister Peter O’Neill.

Titled The Midas Touch, this investigative feature, to be published in three-parts, will reveal hundreds of millions of kina in assets owned by the Prime Minister, and a business empire that has its origins in alleged frauds condemned in two Commissions of Inquiry.

Part I, published today, unlocks for the first time the evidence of the Prime Minister himself, as published in Commission transcripts, and unravels a complicated series of corporate takeovers and hidden deals that have made Peter O’Neill a very wealthy man.

Parts II and II will follow over the coming weeks.

Once complete, The Midas Touch will expose how the Prime Minister’s corporate empire has benefited from government decision making, multi-lateral loans, and even foreign government spending.

PNGi contributions aim is to stimulate debate and encourage the development of new laws and policies that will be effective in the fight to control market abuse, corruption and other improper dealings, and, ultimately, to improve the lives of ordinary citizens.

The Papua New Guinea 2017 general election is June 24 until July 8.

]]>

Five PNG police officers sentenced to 87 years in jail for rape, arson

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

The National Court building in Wewak, Papua New Guinea … accused “acted like criminals”. Image: Loop PNG

By Sally Pokiton in Wewak, Papua New Guinea

Former Wewak Police Station commander Chief Inspector Sakawar Kasieng has been sentenced to seven years in prison for arson and four of his officers were convicted for raping a 17-year-old girl at her family home almost four years ago. They were each sentenced to 20 years in prison.

Kasieng, of Sibilanga Village, Sandaun Province, spent four months in custody prior to being sentenced yesterday. He will now spend six years and eight months in hard labour.

Robin Weibi of Tomonoum Village, Nuku, Sandaun Province, Timon Kangapu of Hirae Village, Kopiago, Southern Highlands Province, Stanley Moui Jombu of Passam, East Sepik Province, and Nigel Tianguma Harvey of Mikarew area, Bogia, Madang Province, were each sentenced to 20 years.

They also spent four months in custody. They will now spend 19 years and eight months with hard labour.

They were found guilty and convicted for aggravated rape of the teenager in her room at Kwanumbo Village in the early hours of 7 December 2013.

The victim, who is now 21 years old, gave evidence in court during the trial with her mother and father.

-Partners-

Her father was serving a 40 years in jail sentence for murder when he and other prisoners escaped.

Dawn raid
On 7 December 2013, at least 15 policemen, led by Chief Inspector Kasieng, with the assistance of civilian informants, conducted a dawn raid on a hamlet at Kwanumbo Village, Boikin, East Sepik Province.

This was to capture a number of prison escapees, including the rape victim’s father.

The court heard that during the raid, two houses were torched, items were stolen and the escapees were apprehended and tied up. One escapee had his leg shot at after he had been restrained.

The four named policemen then entered the victim’s house and raped her. Her hands and legs were held onto the floor as each one took his turn to rape her.

When the victim’s mother complained to Chief Inspector Kasieng, she was told to shut up and on the police chief’s orders, she was assaulted and restrained by policemen.

On their arrest, Inspector Kasieng and the four policemen exercised their right to remain silent.

Justice George Manuhu handed down the sentence in Wewak yesterday after he heard a submissions on the sentence by the accused’s lawyer on Monday.

During submissions on Monday, each of the convicted prisoners of the state expressed remorse and willingness to pay compensation.

Failure to control
Former Chief Inspector Kasieng admitted his failure to control the operation, which resulted in the burning down of two houses, the shooting of Joel Pokip in the legs, and the sexual assault on the teenager.

“In any case, the four of you knew the law and you knew that sexually assaulting someone is against the law. So the four of you cannot place all the blame on Kasieng,” Justice Manuhu told them in court.

The court also noted that it was not Kasieng’s first time in court. He had previously been in court for assault and he had failed to pay court-ordered compensation.

“These reports do not help him at all,” the judge told him.

“Fortunately, the victim did not contract any sexual disease, she did not become pregnant, there is no evidence of any mental issues, and she did not suffer from any physical injuries. In relation to the burning down of the house, there was no evidence on the value of the house. These are the factors that are in your favour.

“Against you is that as policemen, you were charged with the responsibility to uphold the law and by virtue of that law, you have a duty to protect the citizens of this country.

‘Acted like criminals’
“But look at what you have done. You acted in contradiction to your duty and committed crimes against the people you were supposed to protect.

“You acted like criminals, all of you,” Justice Manuhu told them.

He said the warrant issued by the court did not authorise them to burn down houses and sexually assault the teenager.

“I don’t know what went through your heads in those two hours you were in the village. You have brought shame upon all of us as officers of the law.”

He said the undisciplined behaviour of policemen in Papua New Guinea was prevalent and destroying the country, and that people awere fed up with hearing about undisciplined policemen.

]]>

PNG grants citizenship to 138 West Papuans, waives legal fees

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

New Papua New Guinean citizens at the weekend ceremony in Port Moresby. Image: EMTV News

By Delly Waigeno in Port Moresby

Four naturalised citizens and 138 West Papuans have become citizens of Papua New Guinea.

Acting Chief Migration Officer Solomon Kantha said he was proud that the current government had been the first to take steps to see West Papuans get legal status in Papua New Guinea.

He also acknowledged the government for doing away with the K10,000 (about NZ$4350) citizenship fee for West Papuan refugees.

The citizenship certificate ceremony was a small but significant affair at the Sir John Guise Stadium Indoor Complex at the weekend in Port Moresby.

Present included officers from the Immigration and Citizen Service Authority, PNG Citizenship Advisory Committee and the board, recipients, family and friends.

Acting Chief Migration Officer Kantha said the four naturalised citizens who originated from China, Philippines and the United States had already contributed immensely to Papua New Guinea.

-Partners-

For the larger group of West Papuans, he acknowledged their resilience without government support and also acknowledged their contribution towards nation building.

Naturalised citizen Stephen Dunran expressed gratitude.

Kantha said the Department of Foreign Affairs and Immigration would work on getting the citizenship certificates signed and issue passports as well.

More than 10,000 West Papuan refugees are believed to be living in Papua New Guinea — many have been in the country for more than three decades.

More than 1000 West Papuans are reported to be in line for PNG citizenship.

Delly Waigeno is an EMTV News reporter.

]]>

Juffa blasts PNG for ‘hypocrisy’ over deportation of NZ missionary

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Oro Governor Gary Juffa blasts PNG government over the deportation of NZ Catholic missionary Douglas Tennent. Video: EMTV News

Pacific Media Watch News Desk

Oro Governor Gary Juffa has condemned the Papua New Guinea government for “hypocrisy” and “double standards” over the controversial deportation of New Zealand Catholic missionary Douglas Tennent.

Acting Chief Immigration Officer Solomon Kantha told EMTV News that Tennent’s deportation last week related to “visa conditions”.

However, Juffa, who has been vocal about foreign investors in the country during the election campaign, said the move by the Immigration Office to deport Tennent was illegal and not in the best interests of Papua New Guineans who were being marginalised on their own land by big foreign companies.

NZ Catholic missionary Douglas Tennent … deported over helping landowners. Image: EMTV News

If the current PNG government was interested in the people it would support Tennent and say, “let us fight this corruption and deal with this on behalf of the landowners,” Juffa said.

The PNG Immigration Department is reviewing its decision to deport Tennent, reports Cathnews.

-Partners-

Kantha said Tennent’s visa had been cancelled by Immigration and Foreign Affairs Minister Rimbink Pato because of his alleged involvement in landowner issues, the NZ Catholic news service reported.

The acting immigration head said the decision was based on a “complaint” from landowners in East New Britain.

The Sikite Mukus palm oil project has been a “hive of landowner dispute” between those who want the project and those who do not want the project, EMTV News said.

Archbishop refuses
The Post-Courier reported that Kantha had told the archbishop of Rabaul, Francesco Panfilo, that Tennent could reapply for a new visa and work permit.

However, the archbishop has refused to do so unless he receives reassurance from PNG’s Foreign Affairs Department that Tennent could return.

He is also demanding to know who lodged the complaint letter.

The managing director of the landowners’ umbrella company, Memalo Holdings Ltd, has denied being responsible.

Wesley Pagott said although the members of Sigite Mukus Integrated Rural Development Project (SMIRDP) disagreed with with what Tennent had been doing, they were surprised to hear that he was deported.

Memalo Holdings was originally incorporated listing six separate landowner companies as shareholders.

They were all incorporated on the same day. Two have since been delisted.

Memalo controls the land on which the SMIRDP is being developed by the Malaysian logging company Rimbunan Hijau Group (PNG).

The group has a diverse set of interests that encompass forestry, timber processing, palm oil, transport, media, retail and property development.

It is a wholly owned subsidiary of Rimbunan Hijau, a company based in Sarawak, Malaysia.

Governor pledges support
The Acting Governor of East New Britain, Cosmas Bauk, has pledged his support for Tennent, Cathnews reported.

He said he would do everything in his power to make sure that Tennent could return to continue on with his work.

Bauk said he was disappointment at the manner in which the current government had been doing its business without regards to the people’s fight for justice and what they rightfully claimed as theirs.

He commended the church for their efforts in assisting the people in Pomio and East New Britain and would stand with the church in this fight.

The Papua New Guinea 2017 general election is June 24 until July 8.

]]>

Images: ‘No BCL, no mining,’ say protesting Panguna women

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Landowner women and mothers have protested over plans to reopen the Panguna mine on Bougainville in Papua New Guinea.

They demonstrated in Arawa in central Bougainville and blockaded the route to the derelict Panguna copper mine late last week in a bid to prevent the signing of a memorandum of agreement between the Autonomous Bougainville Government (ABG) and Bougainville Copper Limited, which has disputed ownership of the mine.

The women also succeeded in getting a court injunction against the mine agreement in the National Court in Port Moresby on Friday afternoon.

Llane Munau was there to capture the women’s protest on camera.

1. “No BCL, No Mining”, Image: Llane Munau/PMC say the women.

2. Bougainvillean women on the march. Image: Llane Munau/PMC

3. “Don’t dig my lands.” Image: Llane Munau/PMC

4. Challenge to BCL. Image: Llane Munau/PMC

5. Protest women with sun-shelter brollies. Image: Llane Munau/PMC

6. “No BCL,” the bottom line message. Image: Llane Munau/PMC

7. Men in the rear of the protest. Image: Llane Munau/PMC

8. One of the women speakers offers her message. Image: Llane Munau/PMC

9. Prayers at the protest. Image: Llane Munau/PMC

10. Women lay down the challenge. Image: Llane Munau/PMC

]]>

‘Make election less disruptive’ pleads commissioner ahead of PNG ballot

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

PNG Electoral Commissioner Patilias Gamato … “let’s have a good and peaceful 2017 national election”. Image: Post-Courier

By Gorethy Kenneth in Port Moresby

More than 800 election monitors will be deployed nationwide to observe and make independent reports on Papua New Guinea’s national election starting this Saturday.

Electoral commissioner Patilias Gamato says international and local monitors will report back to their respective organisations, heads of governments and the government itself on the credibility of the PNG election process.

“We have invited international election monitors or observers to visit during the months of June and July to see whether we have planned well for the election and also see if we followed the rule of law and the election laws on conducting the 2017 national election,” Gamato said in a statement.

“These election monitors or observers are invited from the Commonwealth Secretariat, European Union, governments of Australia and New Zealand, resident heads and staff of foreign missions from Australia, Great Britain, United States of America, France, Japan, Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat, Melanesian Spearhead Group Secretariat, Australian National University and other election management bodies from other parts of the world,” he said.

“Our very own civil society watchdog, Transparency International (PNG) Inc., again will deploy 400 election monitors, the largest number of monitors nationwide,” Gamato said.

He also appealed for calm in the remaining seven days of campaigning and the next month of polling and counting.

-Partners-

“Fellow Papua New Guineans, emotional reactions to your political opponents by supporters must not be encouraged. But as a responsible leader, you must always urge restraint and discourage such bad acts or violence,” he said.

Less disruptive, violent
“As your Electoral Commissioner, I strongly urge each and every one of you, the leaders of political parties, tribes and clans to make this election far less disruptive or violent than previous national elections,” Gamato said.

“Let’s have a good and peaceful 2017 national election to demonstrate to our regional neighbours and the international community that Papua New Guinea is truly democratic and has a vibrant democracy.”

More than 500 of these election observers have now arrived in Port Moresby, ready to kick-start election scrutiny.

They will be meeting with all the party executives tomorrow.

Sensitive election materials have also been moved from the capital to provincial centres nationwide over the last seven days by the Australian defence force ahead of polling.

The materials include ballot papers, candidate posters, polling schedules and electoral rolls, Gamato said.

“So far the Papua New Guinea Electoral Commission is all good to go and set for the 2017 national election.”

Gorethy Kenneth is a senior reporter with the PNG Post-Courier.

]]>

Panguna landowner women protesters block mine pact, win court order

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Panguna women landowner protesters — mothers from the mining affected areas and the women from Central Bougainville — have demanded the Autonomous Bougainville Government to properly address the Panguna Mine issue. Video: EMTV News

Pacific Media Centre News Desk

Panguna women protesters have blockaded the copper mine to prevent the signing of a memorandum of understanding by the Bougainville government with the company and also won a court injunction.

Justice Kandakasi ordered in the Waigani National Court on Friday that the MOA cannot be signed until further notice.

Philip Miriori, chairman of the Special Mining Lease Osikaiyang Landowners Inc., welcomed the restraining order.

Mothers and daughters at the Panguna mine protest on Friday. Image: Loop PNG

He said it was good to see that protection from “unjust deprivation of property” under Section 53 of the Constitution of PNG – and preserved in the Constitution of the Autonomous Bougainville Government (Section 180) as adopted by the Bougainville Constituent Assembly at Buin on 12 November 2004 – was being enforced.

The Bougainville Freedom Movement also congratulated the women of Bougainville and their supporters for stopping the Bougainville government on Friday from signing a new agreement for Bougainville Copper Limited (BCL) to reopen the Panguna mine.

The National Court order supporting the Panguna women landowners seeking to block Bougainville Copper Limited. Image: PMC

-Partners-

“The handpicked BCL landowners who were supposed to sign the agreement for the company were brought to a halt, thanks to the road block protest held on Friday,” said BFM’s Vikki John.

The Panguna mine was abandoned by in 1989 after frustration by landowners erupted into a decade-long armed uprising and a push for Bougainville independence from Papua New Guinea.

‘Seven sisters’ roadblock
Loop PNG reports: “The impenetrable roadblock was led by women chief from the ‘seven sisters’ areas in Central Bougainville.

The mothers, together with their daughters, youths, ex-combatants and Bougainville hardliners, set up the roadblock, which started on Thursday night and lasted throughout Friday. They refused to move for passing vehicles or negotiating team.

“Their message was simple: ‘No BCL, No Mining’.

A woman chief from Guava Village, Maggie Mirau Nombo, and a chief from Arawa and Pirurari, Kavatai Baria, said their land was their ‘Mother’, who provided their everyday needs and no one was allowed to exploit her.

“Chief Maggie, who is a former primary school teacher, said how could those wanting to sign the MOA conduct such an act of injustice?

“She said this would never happen again because they had suffered enough from all the injustice that had been brought on by BCL when it was in operation.

“She said God had heard the cry of the Bougainville women, and justice would prevail.

“As long as I am the Chief from Panguna and Guava Village and owner of my land, BCL is not welcome. This is the company that has killed our sons and daughters. ABG has to stop ignoring the cries of the women and take note that BCL is never allowed to come back to Panguna, and this is final and it is not negotiable,” she said.

“Chief Kavatai also reminded everyone that ‘when God closes a door, no one can open it, and if God opens a door, no one can close it’.

“Panguna Mine was closed by God and if anyone was trying to reopen the mine when it wasn’t God’s timing, then they had better watch out because they were fighting against a big God.

“Because of the strong opposition by the women, youths and Bougainville hardliners, the high-powered ABG delegation, led by President John Momis, returned to Buka on Friday afternoon without signing the MOA.”

The Papua New Guinea 2017 general election is June 24 until July 8.

]]>

Al Jazeera caught in the Qatar crisis crossfire, reports Mediawatch

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Al Jazeera’s newsroom in Doha … independent news sympathetic to Arab Spring. Image: Middle East Monitor

Pacific Media Watch News Desk

So-called “fake news” and the damage it can do has featured much in the media in recent months.

Radio NZ’s Mediawatch looks at how one false story sparked a row between Qatar and its neighbours, which has now cast a shadow over the future of the pioneering international TV news channel Al Jazeera.

Author Tarek Cherkaoui … insights into Al Jazeera. Image: RNZ Mediawatch

Mediawatch’s Jeremy Rose interviews Dr Tarek Cherkaoui, holder of an Auckland University of Technology doctorate and author of The News Media at War, on how the clash between Western and Arab media perspectives has contributed to global polarisation.

Al Jazeera English has reflected a sympathetic view of the Arab Spring upheaval and Al Jazeera Arabic has been challenging for authoritarian regimes in the region.

Russian ‘freelance’ hackers
An inquiry last week by the FBI found that Russian “freelance” hackers were responsible of the fake news broadcast on the state-run Qatar News Agency, sparking the biggest crisis in decades crisis among the Gulf States.

A Guardian report said: “Some observers have claimed privately that Saudi Arabia or the United Arab Emirates (UAE) may have commissioned the hackers.”

-Partners-

Earlier this month, after the fake news report, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, and Bahrain launched an unprecedented campaign to isolate Qatar diplomatically and economically with a transport blockade over alleged links to the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and Iran. Qatar has rejected the allegations as “without foundation”.

Al Jazeera employs a number of New Zealand journalists and is the only global news channel broadcast on the free-to-air platform Freeview in New Zealand.

]]>

Vanuatu president who struck ‘decisive blow’ against corruption dies

]]>

AsiaPacificReport.nz

Vanuatu’s President Baldwin Lonsdale … remembered for his leadership of the Anglican church, and his strong support for kastom and for women’s rights. Image: Vanuatu Digest

OBITUARY: Pacific Media Watch News Desk

Vanuatu’s President Baldwin Jacobson Lonsdale has died at Vila Central Hospital early today after being rushed to hospital last night, reports Vanuatu Digest.

President Lonsdale, 67, had been Head of State since September 2014.

From Mota Lava island, Lonsdale was previously an Anglican priest, secretary-general of Torba Province.

He did his tertiary studies in Auckland, New Zealand, at St John’s Theological College.

President Lonsdale played a critical role in recent events in Vanuatu. While category 5 Cyclone Pam was battering Vanuatu in March 2015, President Lonsdale was attending a world conference on disaster risk reduction in Japan, and his emotional appeals for international assistance helped galvanise the international humanitarian response to Cyclone Pam, reports Vanuatu Digest.

But arguably his greatest contribution came just seven months later in October 2015 when the then Speaker of Parliament, Marcellino Pipite, abused his position as Acting President to issue a “presidential pardon” to himself and 13 other MPs who had just been convicted of bribery.

-Partners-

The President, en route from Samoa during Pipite’s attempt to undermine the rule of law, returned to Vanuatu and immediately revoked the pardon.

Misuse of powers
During a televised address to the nation, President Lonsdale was visibly upset, expressing his “shame and sorrow” at Pipite’s misuse of his powers.

He vowed to “clean the dirt from my backyard”, telling Vanuatu’s people that “we as a nation have to stop these crooked ways”.

Following a failed appeal against his revocation of Pipite’s pardon, Lonsdale then dissolved Parliament and called a snap election.

President Lonsdale’s actions were widely seen as a decisive blow against Vanuatu’s culture of impunity for corrupt politicians, reports Vanuatu Digest.

Addressing the newly-elected MPs at the opening session of Parliament following the election, he described the new legislature as a “new chart for Vanuatu’s destiny”.

He will also be remembered for his leadership of Vanuatu’s Anglican church, and his strong support for kastom and for women’s rights.

The Vanuatu government is currently making arrangements with his family and Motalava chiefs for a state funeral.

Under the constitution, a new president will need to be elected by MPs and local government chairs within three weeks.

]]>