Gary Juffa: Why these PNG elections are taking us towards dictatorship

0
7

Article by AsiaPacificReport.nz

OPINION: By Gary Juffa, current Governor of Oro and a candidate in these elections

I suspect that these Papua New Guinea elections have been so deliberately set to fail, leaving much room for fraud and confusion, that we will be distracted from what is really going on – the establishment of a dictatorship.

Already Prime Minister Peter O’Neill has his own special police unit that flies around Papua New Guinea escorting him in his private airlines, he has a special army unit of 40 exclusively for his callout, he controls the media and Public Service.

And, it seems, the Police and Defence commands — and perhaps the judiciary … the signs and red flags are blinking bright red now…

Yet many people do not see it at all. We are inching closer towards dictatorship and the ensuing bloodshed and violence that must come from the hostility towards it. But like lemmings and sheep, we are led to that reality with little resistance at all. Is this the Papua New Guinea we all believed in once upon a time?

This is what I wrote on my Facebook blog this week:

FAILURE TO PLAN OR A PLANNED FAILURE?

-Partners-

Today [Wednesday in Oro province] was a demonstration of how much the PNG government is NOT for PNG.

It was also a demonstration of how democracy should not work.

For instance, the majority — between a third and a half — of Popondetta Urban voting age citizens have NOT voted because the current common roll does not have their names.

Many citizens claim they had made the effort to update their details and were still were turned away.

Meanwhile, Electoral Commissioner Patilias Gamato has advised all that the preliminary roll can be used. This means that he indirectly agrees that the EC failed to effectively update the 2017 roll. This instruction was obviously not made known to Electoral Commission officials managing the polling at the Independence Oval today.

Many who had taken time out and had travelled into vote, were turned away angry and anxious. This election was certainly costing them. They will have to come back for the last day, but the slowness will probably ensure that a large group will not have been processed by the end of the polling day — 4pm.

This will mean that democracy certainly did not prevail in this instance. In fact, many will probably agree that come the end of these elections, democracy was hardly a reality everywhere in Papua New Guinea. This should hardly be a surprise given that we have actually endured a covert dictatorship and hardly realised it.

Own effort
Meanwhile, not a few of the learned are saying that everyone should have made their own effort to ensure they were registered.

A true statement we all would like to agree in the first instance. I was tempted to think this way too. Then I thought of my people in rural PNG. My uncles and aunts who do not read or write and are at once the greatest selfless humans I know and despite whatever people think, are equal shareholders of this great nation Papua New Guinea.

They too deserve to vote. They too deserve to be informed. They too have the right to be given the opportunity to decide whether they wanted to update their details on the common role or not.

May I just say to all my learned friends making such statements as “it’s your fault if you are not on the roll! Stop whinging”, that this would be true if the awareness had been been carried out sufficiently and it would be true in a society which is totally literate and where means of communication are available to all, a society that, say, had more then just 40 years or so as an independent nation of 1000 tribes with their own language groupings and cultural peculiarities.

Such statements are also spiteful about our people, my friends. Yes our people. Many who live in rural PNG and do not have access to the benefits of technology and modern services and goods that you may have had and may have now.

Yes, our people, remember them? Well some of these are the people who will adore you and feed you and love you selflessly when or should you ever go home for a visit from time to time.

It would also be a safe statement to make if Papua New Guinea were governed by a government which allowed information access and made it possible for all. A government that made funding available for provincial governments and relevant information dissemination entities like the National Broadcasting Corporation (NBC).

Government by the people
Of course, that would have to be a government of the people, by the people, for the people…which this government clearly is not if any of its decisions made in the last 5 years are anything to go by – i.e. next to none were in the interests of the people or the nation.

Back to Elections 2017. It is clear that the Electoral Commission failed. But the commission is not entirely to be blamed because, the buck stops at the top…and that’s the People’s National Congress (PNC)-O’Neill government.

They have totally failed in the last 5 years to ensure that everyone was on the roll.

For instance, the awareness was an abysmal failure. Rural Papua New Guinea especially had virtually no knowledge of this. That’s 85 percent of PNG.

For those who state that it is the fault of the voter, let us consider our voters first before making such statements.

Who are they?

Well, they are our people.

And most of them are illiterate.

And most of them are in rural PNG.

Whole day to travel
So lets say how can it be the fault of a substance farmer in Manau, Sohe, Oro province where it takes a whole day to travel to Popondetta by dinghy if one wanted to access any services.

A farmer who never had an education because the school there was closed for an entire decade? How is it his fault if he didn’t have access to radio because NBC is the only radio service and that has been so underfunded that it is barely functioning in most of rural PNG? He is one of a population of about 4000 people of voting age in Manau.

That’s an example.

These are the stories the length and breadth of PNG for the vast majority of Papua New Guineans.

Were our people adequately informed?

They were not.

The Electoral Commission had 5 years to do this.

They failed.

Just as they did with the K200 million national identity (NID) Project. Deliberately too it appears.

This government failed.

Peter O’Neill failed

The 2017 Elections are looking very much like a failure.

A planned failure perhaps … it has to be.

Sipping champagne
From our perspective, perhaps not from the PNC government’s perspective. Maybe they are chuckling and sipping champagne and congratulating each other on a job well done. Chaos provides opportunities for those who plan it to. Who knows?

Meanwhile in stark contrast, preparations for APEC seem to be going on very well. Surprise, surprise. Funding is abundantly available and preparatory meetings, plans, strategies and training and capacity testing efforts are well in progress. Not a few MPS whose companies will be involved in various services needed have already picked up hefty contracts.

So obviously the government can do a great job.

If it suits them.

But when it suits the people…well, they hardly care. There’s nothing in it for them.

So the people are all told that this one-off event, APEC 2018, which the country can barely afford will be “beneficial” for them and the country.

Yes, that’s right APEC … an event that will cost far more then the 2017 Elections and benefit PNG next to nothing.

Democratic rights
Ask yourself, is APEC more important then the democratic rights of a people to elect their leaders to represent their interests in Parliament?

I don’t think so. But of course not a few learned experts will disagree and be outraged by my lack of interest in international trade.

Who am I but just one of millions of Papua New Guineans who are obviously of no consequence or concern to this PNC government…

This just shows how much the PNC government cares for its people. How much? In my measure, it was so weak and poor an effort, so pathetic, that it was “zilch”.

Gary Juffa’s commentaries are frequently published by Asia Pacific Report with permission. This commentary is a combination of two of his latest pieces.

SHARE

NO COMMENTS