
Why Meta is paying for controversial content – and what that means for the posts you see
Paying for engaging content is not the same as intending to fund extremism, but it creates a risk that harmful content will benefit.
Independent Analysis and Reportage

Paying for engaging content is not the same as intending to fund extremism, but it creates a risk that harmful content will benefit.

Neither side can stomach a strategic defeat. Nor can they find a way to an exit ramp.

The telecommunications ombudsman has recommended ‘an overhaul of how telecommunications services are regulated’.

The government wants a knowledge-rich physics curriculum, but packing in too many topics without a clear order could backfire.

Despite their high confidence overall, almost half of surveyed election officials worried about the cost of running elections.

One Nation has staked its claim to being the working class party of choice, arguing Labor has long left the ‘battlers’ behind.

Mahjong is having a moment. But what happens when a Chinese tradition becomes a lifestyle trend?

The argument that young people belong in school misses an important point: children and teenagers have political and civic rights.

These underwater disasters can trigger coral bleaching and massive fish kills.

Adaptation plans don’t account for groundwater in shallow coastal aquifers, which can rise with sea levels, increasing the risk of flooding and damage.

Who gets to authorise such deployments? And who checks the safeguards?

Due to the remote location and croc-inhabited waters, these northern reefs are largely overlooked and understudied.