Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Phil Lester, Professor of Ecology and Entomology, Te Herenga Waka — Victoria University of Wellington
The first Asian yellow-legged hornets observed in Auckland in winter were two old and slow males. Many people were concerned and worried. Now, at the end of spring, what we’ve seen is a potential nightmare.
Over recent weeks, the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) response team has discovered around two dozen spring queens and small nests across the suburb of Glenfield.
Unless New Zealand rapidly scales up its search effort, we could soon be confronting an incursion far tougher and costlier to stamp out. Or worse, we could end up with this pest as a permanent resident.
Overseas, nest densities can exceed 12 per square kilometre. These nests can produce as many as 500 new queens in autumn.
If our current incursion stemmed from a single nest that produced hundreds of queens, the two dozen queens and small nests detected this spring may be only a small fraction of what is actually out there.
An incursion of such a scale would spell particular trouble for our honey bees, which can make up as much as 70% of this hornet’s diet. In parts of Europe where the species has established itself, they have wiped out 30% to 80% of hives.
People are at risk, too. Those who approach nests too closely risk severe stings known to cause intense pain, rapid swelling and, in some cases, life-threatening allergic reactions. People have died after being stung by these hornets.
In dollar terms, the cost to countries – in control and lost productivity – can be in the tens of millions. Is New Zealand doing enough while it still can?
We need more boots on the ground
New queens are still being found in Auckland, and the capture rate is increasing. That could be due to better monitoring, bigger nests or more eyes on the ground.
Whatever the reason, the increasing captures are a major concern. The more we search, the more hornets we find. That trend must reverse.
The ideal scenario is for teams to spend days – and weeks – searching without finding anything new. Only then could we be confident hornet populations are being effectively controlled. Clearly, we are not there yet.
MPI teams are spending long hours searching on the ground and have increased staff numbers. They are doing an excellent job and deserve real credit. But it is clear more searchers are needed.
This would allow coverage of a much wider area, and there is debate about how far the search zone should extend.
Jean-Bernard Nadeau/Science Photo Library, CC BY-NC-ND
MPI has focused on detection areas of 200 metres around each nest, supported by traps out to five kilometres, in line with international experience and guidance. But other evidence and opinion from Europe suggest this may not be enough.
Year-to-year observations show new nests can appear kilometres from previous sites, while worst-case early invasion spread rates have been estimated at around 30 kilometres a year, accelerating to 75 to 112 kilometres each year once populations become established.
If these European patterns apply even partially to New Zealand, the search radius must expand dramatically, requiring many more people in the field and a careful watch from the public in the wider region around Auckland.
Eradication is the goal
The only successful eradication of the yellow-legged hornet occurred on Majorca, off the coast of Spain. The programme ran for six years across an area of about 35 by 25 kilometres.
Success depended on a mix of citizen reports, active nest searching by volunteers and government staff, and mechanical nest removal. After three years of finding and destroying nests, Majorca recorded three consecutive years with no detections.
This shows eradication is achievable over a substantial area.
New Zealand also has an advantage with toxic bait such as Vespex, which is locally designed for invasive wasp control and has been shown to be safe for use near beehives.
We’ve seen Vespex knock down wasps by more than 97% in thousands of hectares of New Zealand forest. While its effectiveness against this hornet is not yet fully known, it has potential to be a powerful tool.
For it to work, foraging worker hornets must collect the bait. January and February are likely to be the best months in which to deploy it – when nests are large enough to produce active foragers but before they begin generating new queens and males.
Later in summer, we’ll need to be prepared to find and control any remaining nests. Those can be high and hidden in tree tops, requiring equipment to lift people high into the canopy, and long poles to spray pesticides into nests.
With a ramped-up search effort and using all available tools, including Vespex, the Majorca experience suggests eradication here is realistic.
The priority now is to maximise the search effort, map the true boundary of the infestation and destroy nests before they produce new queens and males.
Everyone can play their part by staying alert and reporting online any suspected sightings, or by phoning 0800 809 966. Beekeepers can find MPI’s surveillance guide and an easy-to-build trap design on its website.
Phil Lester serves on the Technical Advisory Group for the Ministry for Primary Industries’ hornet response.
– ref. NZ now has a narrow window to stop the Asian yellow-legged hornet – here’s how everyone can help – https://theconversation.com/nz-now-has-a-narrow-window-to-stop-the-asian-yellow-legged-hornet-heres-how-everyone-can-help-270800










Tucker Carlson ‘tuckered out’ with Donald Trump and Israel – insights for New Zealand rightwing politics
COMMENTARY: By Ian Powell
The origin of the expression “tuckered out” goes back to the east of the United States around the 1830s.
After New Englanders began to compare the wrinkled and drawn appearance of overworked and undernourished horses and dogs to the appearance of tucked cloth, it became associated with people being exhausted.
Expressions such as this can be adapted, sometimes with a little generosity, to apply to other circumstances.
This adaptation includes when a prominent far right propagandist and activist who, in a level of frustration that resembles mental exhaustion, lashes out against far right leaders and governments that he has been strongly supportive of.
This came to my attention when reading a frustrated far right lament reposted on Facebook (27 November) by British-Pakistani socialist Tariq Ali.
If anything meets the threshold for a passionate expression of grief or sorrow, this one did.
The lament was from Tucker Carlson, an American far right political commentator who hosted a nightly political talk show on Fox News from 2016 to 2023 when his contract was terminated.
Since then he has hosted his own show under his name on fellow extremist Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter). Arguably Carlson is the most influential far right host in the United States (perhaps also more influential than the mainstream rightwing).
He is someone who the far right government of Israel considered to be an unshakable ally.
Carlson’s lament
The lament is brief but cuts to the chase:
There is no such thing as “God’s chosen people”.
God does not choose child-killers.
This is heresy — these are criminals and thieves.
350 million Americans are struggling to survive,
and we send $26 billion to a country most Americans can’t even name the capital of.
His lament doubled as a “declaration of war” on the entire narrative Israel uses to justify its genocide in Gaza. But Carlson didn’t stop there. He went on to expose the anger boiling inside the United States.
The clip hit the US media big time including 48 million views in the first nine hours. Subsequently a CNN poll showed that 62 percent of Americans agree with Carlson and that support for Israel among Americans is collapsing.
But Carlson went much further directly focussing on fellow far right Donald Trump who he had “supported”.
By focussing the US’s money, energy, and foreign policy on Israel, Trump was betraying his promises to Americans.
This signifies a major falling out including a massive public shift against Israel (which is also losing its media shield), the far right breaking ranks, and panic within the political establishment.
It should also be seen in the context of the extraordinary public falling out with President Trump of another leading far right extremist (and conspiracy theorist) Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene. In addition to the issues raised by Carlson she also focussed on Trump’s handling of the Epstein files controversy.
Far right in New Zealand politics
The far right publicly fighting among itself over its core issues is very significant for the US given its powerful influence.
This influence includes not just the presidency but also both Congress and the Senate, one of the two dominant political parties, and the Supreme Court (and a fair chunk of the rest of the judiciary).
Does this development offer insights for politics in New Zealand? To begin with the far right here has nowhere near the same influence as in the United States.
The parties that make up the coalition government are hard right rather than far right (that is, hardline but still largely respectful of the formal democratic institutions).
It is arguably the most hard right government since the early 1950s at least. But this doesn’t make it far right. I discussed this difference in an earlier Political Bytes post (November 3): Distinguishing far right from hard right.
Specifically:
…”hard right” for me means being very firm (immoderate) near the extremity of rightwing politics but still respect the functional institutions that make formal democracy work.
In contrast the “far right” are at the extremity of rightwing politics and don’t respect these functional institutions. There is an overlapping blur between the “hard right” and “far right”.
Both the NZ First and ACT parties certainly have far right influences. The former’s deputy leader Shane Jones does a copy-cat imitation of Trumpian bravado.
Meanwhile, there is an uncomfortable rapport between ACT (particularly its leader and Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour) and the far right Destiny Church (particularly its leader Brian Tamaki).
But this doesn’t come close to meeting the far right threshold for both NZ First and ACT.
The far right itself also has its internal conflicts. The most prominent group within this relatively small extremist group is the Destiny Church. However, its relationship with other sects can be adversarial.
Insights for New Zealand politics nevertheless
Nevertheless, the internal far right fallout in the United States does provide some insights for public fall-outs within the hard right in New Zealand.
This is already becoming evident in the three rightwing parties making up the coalition government.
For example:
These tensions are well short of the magnitude of Tucker Carlson’s public attack on Israel over Gaza and President Trump’s leadership.
However, there are signs with the hard right in New Zealand of at least starting to feel “tuckered out” of collaborating collegially in their coalition government arrangement and showing signs of pending laments.
Too early to tell yet but we shall see.
Ian Powell is a progressive health, labour market and political “no-frills” forensic commentator in New Zealand. A former senior doctors union leader for more than 30 years, he blogs at Second Opinion and Political Bytes, where this article was first published. Republished with the author’s permission.
Article by AsiaPacificReport.nz