Wednesday 8th of April 2026 03:57:03 PM
Page 28

Fuel ‘demand restraint’ being considered by government, Shane Jones says

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

Shane Jones. RNZ / Mark Papalii

The government will be hearing from officials later this week on possible steps towards “demand restraint”, Associate Energy Minister Shane Jones says.

Petrol prices have increased by almost $1 per litre on average in the past month, according to price tracker Gaspy, and diesel even more, as global energy markets react to Iran’s military grip on the Strait of Hormuz following the war launched by the US and Israel.

Around 20 percent of the world’s supply usually transits through the strait.

The government is expected to unveil a support package later on Tuesday which it says will be highly targeted and temporary. Finance Minister Nicola Willis has regularly stated there have been no plans to restrict usage, with stockpiles remaining healthy and supplies still arriving as scheduled.

The latest data from the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment showed stocks for about 47 days of fuel, including about 50 days worth of petrol, 46 days of diesel, and 45 of jet fuel.

Jones, speaking to Morning Report on Tuesday morning, said New Zealand consumed 24 million litres a day – nearly half of which was diesel, a third petrol and the rest aviation fuel.

Towards the end of the week… we’re going to be briefed at a granular level by the officials who are in contact with different industry groups as to the steps we would take if we move towards demand restraint.

“I am focused more on enhancing advancing, broadening and simplifying access to greater levels of supply.”

Reports from importers such as Z Energy were coming in daily, he said.

“We have never once been told that they are unable to deliver, or contracts are being terminated. Naturally, we’re watching that with a pair of hawk eyes. The challenge remains… the access of the refineries owned by Exxon and other such global giants to enough feedstock so they can produce the fuel in suitable quantities.”

Channel Infrastructure chief executive Rob Buchanan and Regional Development Minister Shane Jones atop a 30-million-litre jet fuel tank. RNZ / Peter de Graaf

New Zealand no longer refines crude oil, with the Marsden Point facility shutting down a few years ago.

“The fuel import companies are operating exactly within their statutory envelopes. They are observing what they promised to bring to New Zealand.

“If we are to increase and store more diesel fuel in New Zealand, we need to increase the storage. And I keep saying, the reason we can’t do that at scale is because they closed down the refinery, and I don’t care if you get annoyed with me saying that. I want New Zealanders to bear that in mind. This is the consequence of closing down the refinery.”

Jones has falsely claimed the Labour government closed the refinery down, repeating that claim again on Morning Report. Refining NZ (now Channel Infrastructure), a private company, made the call to end refining at the Marsden Point site and transition to being an import-only hub. The government considered stepping in, but decided against it, with advice to ministers being that risks to fuel security were “very low”, because any event that cut off the supply of refined oil would likely cut off crude as well.

Jones said the government was working with Channel to “enhance” how much product could be stored at Marsden.

“That will give us additional diesel storage. However, I don’t want any Kiwi this morning to doubt whether there’s diesel in the country on its way. There certainly is.”

Speaking to Morning Report after Jones, Labour leader Chris Hipkins said it was a “private decision made by the fuel industry” that would not have hindered New Zealand’s fuel security.

“Marsden Point was refining crude oil that was imported from overseas, so the same supply constraints would be hitting us now whether MarsdenPoint was operating or not.”

He suggested it was ironic that coalition MPs were criticising Labour for having spent “too much money” during the Covid response, yet were now saying “we should have kept a refinery that was going out of business because it was obsolete technology and because it wasn’t economic”.

Asked whether the crisis had shifted his thinking on electrification and moving away from fossil fuels, Jones said it was a “fair point” to stay open-minded.

“There is a source of hydrogen energy in New Zealand. It’s called white hydrogen. It’s called natural occurring hydrogen. I met last week with the Auckland University who are doing extraordinary work in Wairarapa, and they believe they’ve tapped into a vein of infinite power of a hydrogen character, of all places in the hills and the valleys of the Wairarapa coast.

“So I think it’s a fair point that you’re making that we need to be open-minded. And then I say to Kiwis, OK, how do you imagine we’re going to pay for it? To do that, certain things, if we are to underwrite this electrification journey, will have to go by the way.

“And that’s why we have an election. No doubt people will be contesting all of those ideas.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Molesworth Station: The groups vying to take over the country’s largest farm

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

The Molesworth landscape. Supplied / Pamu Farms

Five groups are vying to take over the country’s largest farm.

Molesworth Station, the iconic high country property, is run as a cattle farm by state-owned Pāmu.

The area, known formally as the Rangitahi/Molesworth Recreation Reserve, at the top of the South Island, covers 180,000-hectares of land owned by the Crown and administered by the Department of Conservation (DOC) .

However, with Pāmu’s lease ending in June, DOC has been seeking new applicants to take over.

Applications closed last week with five groups putting forward applications to take over running farm operations at Molesworth.

DOC’s South Marlborough operations manager Stacey Wrenn said it was a “big decision”.

“We’re looking at the next 30 years of this absolutely, incredibly and nationally important place as well as New Zealand’s largest farm,” she said.

“So we are so excited that we have got this set of really high quality proposals. And we’re looking forward to working through those and working out who the best and most appropriate person is to take Molesworth forward into the future.”

Jim Ward, former manager of Molesworth station. PAMU / SUPPLIED

Molesworth’s former-manager of more than 20 years, Jim Ward, confirmed he had been involved in a proposal to see it run as a not-for-profit with heritage status.

“There’s three things that everything revolves around,” he told RNZ.

“The first is the vision for the proposal is we’re calling it the ‘Station for the Nation’, and the values are ensuring accessibility for all and the mission is to maintain the integrity of the land and ensure the longevity of the cultural and historic assets.”

The existing lease with Pāmu expires on the 30th June 2026. It would not confirm if it had put forward an application.

DOC and Pāmu were working together to ensure operations continue smoothly while the preferred operator is selected and new concession processed, and to work through the change of operators, if necessary.

“As the incumbent, Pāmu continues to engage closely with the Department of Conservation regarding the future of the Molesworth lease, and we’re committed to working constructively through their process,” a Pāmu spokesperson said.

Wrenn said she appreciated the effort that had gone into preparing the applications which would now be carefully assessed against set criteria with DOC hoping to select a preferred operator by the end of May.

“Assessment criteria includes the operator’s experience, skills and resources, how biodiversity and heritage values will be protected, how cultural values will be upheld, and how public access will be improved and facilitated.

“Once a preferred operator is chosen, they will be invited to apply for a concession, which will be publicly notified so people can have their say on the proposal.”

Wrenn previously said Molesworth was a special place that was home to threatened plants and animals so there would be restrictions on any lease – the farm can not be used for deer farming, forestry or for activities like game hunting or safari parks.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Australia’s forests are finally doing better — but ‘underwater bushfires’ hit oceans hard

By -

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Albert Van Dijk, Professor, Water and Landscape Dynamics, Fenner School of Environment & Society, Australian National University

Good rainfall across much of Australia in the past year has kept the vegetation green and rivers flowing. For the fifth year in a row, our national environment scorecard for Australia’s landscapes in 2025 rated them as “above average”.

Queensland had an exceptionally wet year. The Channel Country river systems in southwest Queensland flooded spectacularly, sending water surging toward Kati Thanda–Lake Eyre in South Australia. The biggest floods in at least 15 years, this flush of water triggered fish breeding and the arrival of waterbirds from across the continent.

But underneath the ocean waves, it was a different story. Marine heatwaves and the algal bloom in South Australia were a disaster for Australia’s underwater ecosystems and their unique animals and plants.

Two politicians squat on a beach and look at a dead fish washed up on the shore.

Federal Environment and Water Minister Murray Watt with Boothby MP Louise Miller-Frost look at a fish killed by the algal bloom at West Beach in July 2025. Matt Turner

How we assess environmental health

To create this scorecard we analysed large amounts of data from satellites, weather stations, river gauges and ecological surveys. For the eleventh year running we gathered information on topics like climate change, oceans and weather, and summarised it with a score between zero and ten.

This score gives a relative measure of how favourable conditions were for nature, agriculture and the Australian quality of life, compared to all years since 2000.

Conditions varied enormously by region this year, so for the first time we have calculated environmental condition scores right down to the suburb and locality level. You can look up your own area at ausenv.tern.org.au.

Mapping the environmental condition score to local government areas reveals poor (red) conditions in the west and the south, with good scores (blue) in the east and north. White is neutral. Australia’s Environment Explorer, CC BY

A good year but uneven on land

The country’s environmental health was split between a wetter, greener north and east, and a dry south and west. Victoria, Tasmania, the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory all recorded notable declines in environmental condition.

But beyond the rainfall, there were real signs of progress. New detailed data on native forest loss and gain — a first in this year’s report — showed forest loss has declined for five consecutive years, with tree cover increasing nationally.

The amount of land cleared for grazing and native forest logging continued to fall. Vegetation canopy area and soil surface protection against erosion was at near record levels. And Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions fell by 1.9%, even as the economy grew 2.6% and the population by 1.5% — a sign growth and environmental damage are slowly being decoupled. Emissions per person have fallen 30% since 2000, though Australians still emit around three times the global average.

These improvements didn’t happen by accident. They reflect real improvements in land management and nature conservation and policy changes on emissions reduction, forest logging and land clearing accumulated over years.

Bushfires under the sea

What our scorecard doesn’t capture is what happened in our oceans in 2025 — and there the story was very different.

The Black Summer fires of 2019–20 were a climate-driven catastrophe. More than a prolonged drought, it was an extreme heat event that turned the forest into a tinderbox and caused fires of unprecedented scale. Marine heatwaves are doing the same thing underwater.

Sea surface temperatures around Australia reached their highest-ever level in 2025, breaking the record set just the year before. Our new analysis of heat stress across 24 monitored reef locations found that nearly 80% exceeded their once-in-a-decade heat threshold — more than in any previous year of the 40-year record. A sixth mass bleaching event struck the Great Barrier Reef in early 2025, following the fifth just months earlier.

Annual coral reef heat stress around Australia, 1985–2025, measured as the average extent to which water temperatures at 24 monitored reef locations exceeded levels expected in a typical once-in-ten-year event. Australia’s Environment, CC BY

Read more: Synchronised bleaching: Ningaloo and the Great Barrier Reef are bleaching in unison for the first time

The damage extended well beyond the reef. A toxic algal bloom, fuelled by a marine heatwave that pushed water temperatures well above average, spread across nearly a third of South Australia’s coastline and persisted for most of the year, killing more than 80,000 animals of 500 different species and causing respiratory symptoms in coastal residents. Elsewhere, tropical fish appeared far outside their normal ranges.

Marine heatwaves are the underwater equivalent of bushfires: large-scale, climate-driven mass mortality events that used to be rare and are now happening repeatedly. The difference is that most of us don’t see what’s happening below the ocean surface.

The extinction crisis deepens

According to the federal government’s threatened species list, 2,175 species are now listed as threatened – a 54% increase since 2000. Climate change is identified as a threat to nine in ten of the newly listed species. And the legacy of the Black Summer bushfires continues – more than half of all species listed or uplisted since 2019 were affected by those fires.

The Threatened Species Index, which tracks population trends of listed species, shows threatened species have declined by an average of 59% since 2000. In 2025 we published Australia’s first Threatened Reptile Index. Based on the monitoring data included in the index, reptile populations have declined by an average of 88% since 2000, and frogs by 67%, the steepest long-term declines of any group we have measured.

The relative abundance of different categories of species recognised as threatened under Commonwealth nature laws. The Index implements a 3-year lag, such that the latest data are for 2022. TERN Threatened Species Index, CC BY

Reasons for hope

There are some reasons for hope. The index shows that trends for threatened mammal populations have stabilised in recent years. This may reflect both wetter conditions and the impact of conservation management, such as fenced sanctuaries, predator control and habitat restoration. The data show that sustained conservation effort can make a difference.

In many respects, Australia’s environment is in better shape than it was a decade ago, and progress on emissions and land management is real. But global climate change operates on a different scale entirely. Decades of warming are already locked in, and the damage to our oceans and wildlife will worsen until global warming is brought under control.

Reducing our own emissions matters more than ever. This will also make us more resistant to the kind of energy shocks the world is experiencing right now. We cannot reverse all the damage already done, but we can certainly do much better.

– ref. Australia’s forests are finally doing better — but ‘underwater bushfires’ hit oceans hard – https://theconversation.com/australias-forests-are-finally-doing-better-but-underwater-bushfires-hit-oceans-hard-278780

Trump’s ‘Venezuela solution’ to Cuba would see the island nation returned to a client state

By -

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Joseph J. Gonzalez, Associate Professor of Global Studies, Appalachian State University

The U.S. and Cuban governments have been at odds since the conclusion of the Cuban Revolution 67 years ago. Yet despite pressure, embargoes and various CIA plots, the communist government in Havana has resisted the wishes of its very powerful neighbor separated by just 90 miles (145 kilometers) of water.

From my perspective as an expert on Havana-Washington ties, however, this moment seems different.

For the first time since 1959, an American president, Donald Trump, appears on the verge of doing what so many of his predecessors have longed to do: depose a Cuban president and compel the Cuban government to align itself with American economic and strategic interests.

If Trump succeeds – either through military might or negotiation – then Cuba looks set to become something less than a sovereign nation and more akin to an American client state.

A partnership of unequals?

At first glance, the possibility of such a change looks epic, even monumental: an end to the Cuban Revolution as we have known it.

But deep in the annals of U.S.-Cuban history, there are echoes of Trump’s demands.

From 1898 to 1959, the American government essentially ran Cuba as a colony within its empire.

Americans repeatedly decided who would occupy the presidential palace, while Cuban politicians protected U.S. investments and supported U.S. supremacy in the Caribbean. American gangsters ran the hotels and the gambling.

That relationship ended with the revolution and Fidel Castro’s assumption of power. But if Trump has his way, the future of the U.S. and Cuba will look very much like it did in the pre-Castro era: a partnership of unequals.

Heightened tensions

During his first term, Trump turned away from President Barack Obama’s “Cuban Thaw,” which had established diplomatic relations, eased travel restrictions and raised hopes of an end to the decades-old U.S. embargo.

In place of engagement with the Cuban government, Trump strengthened the embargo, all but closed the U.S. Embassy in Havana and further restricted travel by American citizens to the island.

Trump also returned Cuba to the State Department’s list of nations that support terrorism, where it resides today.

Now, one year into his second term, Trump is using coercion backed with a tacit military threat to increase pressure on the Cuban government.

On Jan. 3, 2026, U.S. forces, seized Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, bringing them to New York to stand trial.

During the raid, U.S. forces killed between 75 and 100 Venezuelans and a coterie of Cubans providing security to Maduro.

Venezuela was Cuba’s closest ally, providing the island with oil at vastly reduced prices in exchange for doctors and advisers for Venezuela’s security and intelligence services.

Following Maduro’s arrest, Trump made it clear that the U.S. would no longer permit any country to supply Cuba with oil.

Without oil, Trump predicted that the Cuban government would soon collapse and suggested that Marco Rubio, his Cuban American Secretary of State, could become president of Cuba.

Secret negotiations

Cuba was in severe distress long before Maduro’s arrest.

In the years since the COVID-19 pandemic, the government has found it almost impossible to maintain adequate electricity, water, public health and public transport.

Then came the Trump administration’s oil embargo, which may push Cuba into the worst economic crisis in its history, prompting longer, deeper blackouts and further reductions in public services.

Hunger is now a widespread concern, garbage is piling up and mosquito-borne illnesses are skyrocketing. Dissent is also becoming more public – and more violent.

A man stands in a street with only car headlights lighting the scene.
Blackouts have become common in Cuba. Yamil Lage/AFP via Getty Images

Publicly, the communist government responded defiantly to the Trump administration’s aggressive actions, pledging to resist American pressure just as it had for the better part of 60 years.

Privately, however, the Cuban government agreed to talks with the Trump administration, hoping to find a way to ease American pressure.

The White House reportedly no longer considers the collapse of the Cuban government desirable, as it would precipitate a migration crisis that threatens the stability of the Caribbean, including to a South Florida that is home to the world’s largest Cuban diaspora community.

The ‘Venezuelan Solution’

Cuba’s president, Miguel Díaz-Canel, has publicly acknowledged talks with the U.S. But the particulars remain obscure.

The U.S. government reportedly wants Díaz-Canel to leave the country and permit American investment in Cuba, particularly from Cuban Americans, which has long been prohibited.

The Cuban government has already reportedly acceded to this latter demand.

The Trump administration also wants more political prisoners released and a purge of officials who were close to Fidel and Raúl Castro, his successor as president, and remained powerful after the Cuban revolutionary leader’s death in 2016. According to Amnesty International, Cuba has at least 1,000 prisoners of conscience.

In exchange, the White House would be willing to permit members of the Castro family to remain in Cuba and allow for the importation of oil. The rest of the Cuban government would also remain intact.

Cubans I know are calling this deal the “Venezuela Solution.” Much like Maduro’s successors, Cuba’s leaders would remain rulers of Cuba – provided they accept diminished political sovereignty and respect U.S. policy priorities.

Back to the future

Such a deal, if it happens, would return Cuba to the status of an American client state, the status it held long before Castro seized power and allied himself with the Soviet Union.

In 1898, the U.S. intervened in the Cuban War of Independence, the last in a series of wars fought by Cubans against their onetime Spanish colonizers.

The United States kicked out the Spanish, occupied Cuba and proclaimed its desire to turn Cuba into an independent, sovereign nation-state.

But that never happened.

Distrusting the Cubans’ ability to govern themselves, the U.S. retained the legal right to intervene in Cuban politics.

Between 1898 and 1959, the U.S. government, through its ambassador in Havana, determined who would be president of Cuba whenever a dispute arose.

Cuban politicians, eager to preserve their positions, guarded American property, despite Cuban resentments, and supported U.S. foreign policy throughout Latin America and the world.

On the eve of the revolution, Americans owned more than US$800 million in property in Cuba — the equivalent of at least $9 billion today.

Americans dominated not only the sugar industry but also public utilities, mining and tourism, which American organized crime came to control.

What’s next?

For more than 60 years, pre-revolutionary Cuba endured independence without sovereignty as an American client state.

Could such a relationship reemerge? For now, the situation between the U.S. and Cuba remains fluid, and the terms of discussions are shrouded in secrecy.

Trump, publicly, promotes a “friendly takeover of Cuba,” insisting that he could do with Cuba “anything I want.”

But one thing remains certain. While Trump remains in the White House and Rubio heads the State Department, U.S. maximum pressure on Cuba will not cease.

The Trump administration is committed to ending the Cuban government’s resistance to American power and American investment, regardless of the direct humanitarian costs in the form of the oil embargo and other penalties.

Any deal with Trump will be a bitter pill for Cuba’s political elite to swallow.

But absent an oil-rich ally, like Russia or Venezuela, and faced with an implacable enemy, Cuban officials may have no choice but to bring Cuba back into the orbit of American power, at least for now.

– ref. Trump’s ‘Venezuela solution’ to Cuba would see the island nation returned to a client state – https://theconversation.com/trumps-venezuela-solution-to-cuba-would-see-the-island-nation-returned-to-a-client-state-278710

War in Iran: Why destroying cultural heritage is such a foolish strategic move in any conflict

By -

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Costanza Musu, Associate Professor, Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, L’Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa

Since the start of the ongoing United States–Israeli military campaign against Iran, the human toll of the conflict has mounted relentlessly.

Civilian casualties have been reported across the country, and the bombing campaign has caused widespread destruction to infrastructure. Alongside military targets, thousands of civilian buildings have been damaged or destroyed in the first weeks of the war.

Amid this destruction, another dimension of the conflict is increasingly drawing international concern: the damage inflicted on Iran’s cultural heritage.

Several historically significant sites, including UNESCO landmarks, have been affected. Blasts in Tehran have damaged the Golestan Palace, while strikes in Isfahan hit structures around Naqsh-e Jahan Square, including Ali Qapu Palace, Chehel Sotoun and the Masjed-e Jameh.

The destruction of such sites highlights a frequently overlooked consequence of warfare: when the rules governing the conduct of war are stretched or ignored, cultural heritage, like civilian lives, becomes collateral damage.

A man holds up a photo of a damaged heritage site at a news conference.
Iranian Ambassador to Tunisia Mir Massoud Hosseinian shows an image of damage to the historic Golestan Palace in Tehran, a UNESCO World Heritage site, during a news conference at his residence, in Tunis, on March 12, 2026. (AP Photo/Ons Abid)

Rules of engagement

Warfare is not meant to be unconstrained. It is governed by international humanitarian law, which sets limits on how military force can be used once hostilities begin. These rules are intended to reduce the human and material devastation of armed conflict by protecting civilians and civilian objects.

Read more: Israeli strikes on Tehran oil depot highlight gaps in international law

A man with slicked back hair stands behind another older man as he speaks.
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth listens as U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters while traveling aboard Air Force One en route to Miami, on March 7, 2026. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

States implement these legal obligations through rules of engagement, which guide how and when force may be used in compliance with international humanitarian law: what U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has dismissively called “stupid rules of engagement.”

International humanitarian law protects cultural heritage. After the widespread destruction of the Second World War, states adopted the 1954 Hague Convention, recognizing monuments, museums and archeological sites as specially protected cultural property, and requiring warring nations to refrain from attacking them except in cases of imperative military necessity.

Ignoring cultural property protections runs counter to a lesson many military forces, including the United States, have come to recognize: that safeguarding cultural heritage is not only a legal obligation, but also strategically smart.

Over the past two decades, this approach has increasingly been integrated into military doctrine. By protecting monuments and historic sites, military forces signal respect for a society’s identity, build trust with local populations and advance broader political objectives by fostering local civilian support.

Shifting public sentiment

In the current conflict, American officials have argued that the military campaign is aimed not at Iran’s people but at the regime that has ruled the country since the 1979 revolution.

Read more: What happens next in US-Iran relations will be informed by the two countries’ shared history

U.S. President Donald Trump has suggested that the future of Iran now lies in the hands of its citizens, implying that the weakening of the regime could allow Iranians to shape a different political future.

Initially, some voices in the Iranian diaspora and within Iran welcomed the strikes in the hope that they might open the door to political change.

Yet the scale of the destruction inflicted on cities, infrastructure and cultural landmarks appears to be shifting public sentiment, allowing the Iranian leadership to rally the population around a narrative of national unity against foreign aggression.

At the same time, the conflict is threatening cultural heritage beyond Iran. Iranian missiles have struck areas in and around Jerusalem, where its Old Town contains some of the most significant religious and historical sites in the world within barely one square kilometre. These sites are sacred to Judaism, Christianity and Islam.

If the stated objective of the military campaign is to weaken the Iranian government and open the possibility for political change, the destruction of cultural heritage will produce the opposite effect. Cultural monuments, historic cities and religious sites are not simply architectural artifacts; they are powerful symbols of collective identity and historical continuity.

When they’re damaged or destroyed by foreign military force, the attack is often perceived not only as a strike against a government but an assault on the nation itself.

A black-and-white photo shows a destroyed cathedral.
The German Luftwaffe destroyed Coventry Cathedral in 1940 during the Second World War, strengthening British resolve against the Nazis. (Imperial War Museum)

Rallying citizens

History offers many examples of how damage to cultural heritage during wars can galvanize nationalist sentiment and strengthen the legitimacy of governments under pressure. Examples include the destruction of the Old Bridge of Mostar during the Bosnian War, which became a powerful symbol of national loss and identity, to the levelling of Palmyra’s ancient temples by ISIS, which the Syrian government invoked to reinforce claims of cultural guardianship and political legitimacy.

Rather than weakening the Iranian leadership, widespread destruction, particularly when it affects cultural landmarks, may instead help it mobilize public anger and rally citizens around the defence of the country.

Both international law and historical experience point in the same direction: protecting cultural heritage is not only a humanitarian obligation, but a strategic consideration in conflicts with long-term outcomes that depend on the attitudes of the people affected.

– ref. War in Iran: Why destroying cultural heritage is such a foolish strategic move in any conflict – https://theconversation.com/war-in-iran-why-destroying-cultural-heritage-is-such-a-foolish-strategic-move-in-any-conflict-277922

Spain-US rift: Pedro Sánchez’ defiance of Trump is dictated by domestic politics – but it’s also a litmus test for Europe

By -

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Waya Quiviger, Professor of Practice of Gobal Governance and Development, IE University

The war in Iran has yet again exposed the tensions between Spain’s Pedro Sánchez and Donald Trump. The two leaders have clashed repeatedly over the last year, including over Spain’s ongoing opposition to Israel’s conduct in Gaza, its refusal to raise Nato spending above 2% of GDP, and now its refusal to support the US war in Iran.

In late February, Spain barred the US from using its joint military bases in Rota and Morón for operations linked to the Iran war. As a result, an incensed Trump stated “We’re going to cut off all trade with Spain. We don’t want anything to do with Spain.”

Read more: Could the US cut off trade with Spain? Here’s what international law says

Sánchez has since doubled down on his opposition in a nationally televised address, where he emphatically stated the Spanish government’s position: “No a la guerra”, no to war. On social media he also asserted: “NO to violations of international law” and “NO to the illusion that we can solve the world’s problems with bombs.”

Such pointed defiance of the Trump administration could carry political risks for Sánchez. Indeed, reactions to the war from other European states have been a lot more muted. Why, then, has Sánchez adopted such an unusually confrontational stance?

The clash is being presented as a question of geopolitics or international law, but it is better understood as domestic politics shaping foreign policy. Spain’s historical anti-war political culture, the dynamics of Sánchez’s left-leaning governing coalition, and electoral incentives at home all help account for Madrid’s unusually firm position.

The shadow of Iraq

In his recent address, Sánchez made a specific reference to the 2003 war in Iraq: “Twenty-three years ago, another US Administration dragged us into a war in the Middle East,” he said. “A war which, in theory, was said at the time to be waged to eliminate Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction, to bring democracy, and to guarantee global security but… it unleashed the greatest wave of insecurity that our continent had suffered since the fall of the Berlin Wall.”

In 2003, Spanish Prime Minister José María Aznar joined the US-led coalition to topple Saddam Hussein. The decision triggered massive protests across the country and partly led to Aznar’s defeat in the 2004 elections. His opponent, the Socialist Party’s José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, campaigned on a promise to withdraw troops from Iraq, which he fulfilled immediately after taking office.

The Iraq war fundamentally shaped Spanish public attitudes toward military intervention in the Middle East, and its legacy explains Sánchez’s instinct to distance Spain from the Iran war. His stance is not only ideological – it reflects the memory of how politically damaging it can be for a Spanish government to align itself with US interventions.

Coalition politics and early electoral signals

Sánchez’ position on the war in Iran can also be analysed in the light of current political developments at home. Sánchez governs with support from left-wing parties strongly opposed to US military intervention. Backing Washington, or even facilitating the war through US bases, could risk destabilising that coalition. But the political calculation may go even further.

Sánchez has earned a reputation for repeatedly surviving political crises. Despite declining poll numbers and ongoing scandals within his party and inner circle, he appears to be betting that Trump’s deep unpopularity in Spain will ultimately work to his advantage, particularly among his left-leaning base.

Recent electoral results suggest the strategy may be resonating with voters. In much anticipated regional elections in Castilla y León held on Sunday, Sánchez’ Socialist Party (PSOE) increased its representation, gaining two additional seats despite polls suggesting the party might lose significant ground.

While one election cannot determine national trends, the result offers an early indication that a firm anti-war stance may not carry the domestic political costs critics predicted. If anything, it may have reinforced Sánchez’s appeal across party lines among voters sceptical of military escalation, critical of Donald Trump, and supportive of a more independent European foreign policy.

If Sánchez is proven right, it would also vindicate the Spanish government’s stance on Nato. In June 2025, Spain refused to raise defence spending toward Trump’s proposed 5% Nato target, prompting harsh criticism from the US president. The dispute reflects a broader political reality: higher defence spending is unpopular among the Spanish electorate.

Seen in this context, the Iran war confrontation is part of a longer pattern in which domestic political considerations shape Spain’s position within the transatlantic alliance.

Read more: NATO has deep divisions – but why is Spain its most openly critical member?

Domestic pressures across Europe

Spain’s stance may appear unusually confrontational, but Europe’s response to the Iran war has been far from unified. Much of the variation reflects different domestic political pressures facing European leaders.

In Germany, Chancellor Friedrich Merz initially avoided direct criticism of the US strikes and has generally emphasised transatlantic unity. Nevertheless, he has warned against a prolonged conflict and stressed that Germany “is not a party to this war” and does not want to become one, highlighting concerns about economic disruption and regional instability.

The UK has taken a similarly careful stance. Prime Minister Keir Starmer insisted on clarity about US objectives and legal justification before committing military support, emphasising diplomacy and maritime security rather than direct involvement in the conflict.

Italy’s Giorgia Meloni has raised concerns about the legality of the war, but avoided outright condemnation of Washington. Her government has emphasised respect for existing agreements governing US military bases rather than blocking their use outright, reflecting both Italy’s strong security ties with the United States and Meloni’s own political alignment with transatlantic conservatives.

The overall picture is of a fragmented European response. Across the continent, governments are balancing their own domestic political constraints against broader international strategic calculations.

A litmus test for Europe

Spain’s response to the Iran war may offer the clearest example yet of how domestic politics is shaping Europe’s reaction to the conflict. Time will tell whether Sánchez’s stance proves politically sustainable at home, and whether it makes Spain the champion of a more assertive European approach toward Washington or just an outlier.

If the strategy proves successful, it could encourage other European leaders to push back against Washington. If it backfires, however, Europe’s cautious response will likely become more entrenched.

Either way, the episode illustrates a broader reality of international relations. Foreign policy decisions may be presented as matters of international law or principle, but in democratic systems they are often shaped first and foremost by the pressures of politics at home.

A weekly e-mail in English featuring expertise from scholars and researchers. It provides an introduction to the diversity of research coming out of the continent and considers some of the key issues facing European countries. Get the newsletter!

– ref. Spain-US rift: Pedro Sánchez’ defiance of Trump is dictated by domestic politics – but it’s also a litmus test for Europe – https://theconversation.com/spain-us-rift-pedro-sanchez-defiance-of-trump-is-dictated-by-domestic-politics-but-its-also-a-litmus-test-for-europe-278557

Victorian teachers are on strike for the first time in 13 years – it’s about more than pay

By -

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Duyen Vo, Sessional Lecturer and Researcher, Faculty of Education, Monash University

Victorian public school teachers are walking off the job today. Tens of thousands of school staff, including support staff and principals, are expected to strike.

Teachers in Tasmania are also striking this week. Public schools will be closed in the state’s northwest on Tuesday, the north on Wednesday and the south on Thursday.

Public debate has understandably focused on issues around salaries and workloads, including staff shortages and unpaid overtime.

But industrial action of this scale can also signal something deeper – a breakdown of trust between teachers and the systems they work within.

Teachers want a significant pay increase

During nine months of negotiations with the state government, Victorian school staff have asked for a 35% pay increase over four years, alongside measures to improve workloads.

Teachers argue this rise is needed to keep pace with inflation and bring salaries into line with their interstate colleagues.

The Victorian government’s latest offer includes a 17% pay increase over several years, with limited practical changes to working conditions. On Monday, Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan described the offer as “strong”.

How does Victoria compare with other states?

Teachers argue the Victorian government offer falls well short of what is needed to retain teachers and stabilise the workforce.

Currently, Victorian teachers are among the lowest paid in Australia, with gaps of A$10,000–15,000 per year compared with some other states.

For example, in 2025, entry-level teachers in Victoria were paid $79,589. Over the border, in New South Wales, their colleagues earned $90,177. Victorian school principals were paid $156,335. In NSW they earned $178,812.

Teacher salaries in Australia are set at the state level. In recent years, Victorian pay scales – which are influenced by earlier industrial agreements and relatively lower school funding overall – have not kept up with larger increases in other states.

Tasmanian teachers are so far rejecting a pay rise offer of less than 9% over three years from their state government.

Concerns around workloads

Victorian teachers are also calling for improvements to work conditions. This includes smaller class sizes and increased support staff and allied health resources for students.

Class sizes in Victoria are generally capped at around 25–26 students, with smaller classes in the early years of schools and flexible arrangements in specialist schools.

Teachers say smaller class sizes are key to both equity and effective student learning, particularly if there are students with extra needs.

Class sizes in Victoria are roughly equivalent to those in NSW. But class size is an issue around the country.

On top of this, teachers are seeking measures to address administrative burden and burnout. A 2025 study found nine out of ten Australian teachers are experiencing severe stress, and nearly 70% say their workload is unmanageable.

Last week, the Allan government announced measures to cut down on teachers’ paperwork, including simpler student reports. But this has not stopped the strike action.

Teacher strikes are rare

Given the disruption strikes cause to student learning, historically, teachers tend to avoid industrial action.

This is the first major statewide strike in Victoria in 13 years, highlighting the seriousness of the current dispute.

The only recent comparison is a statewide teacher strike in Queensland in 2025. This similarly focused on pay, workload and working conditions.

Beyond pay

Teachers’ dissatisfaction about their working conditions goes beyond salaries.

Amid an ongoing teacher shortage around the country, research tells us teachers are dealing with abuse from students and parents.

Research also tells us teachers’ job satisfaction is hampered by overly prescriptive curriculum demands and administrative tasks that take them away from classrooms. This means they don’t have the time and autonomy to decide how best to teach and engage their students.

Is there an even deeper issue?

Across our studies examining teachers’ work and wellbeing in Australian schools, one theme appears repeatedly: teachers want to feel respected and trusted in their workplaces.

For example, in our 2024 study of 994 Australian teachers, they emphasised the importance of feeling valued and trusted at work as well as supported and safe.

This means teachers want to be recognised as the professionals they are. This means having their teaching judgement and expertise valued and respected by parents, education administrators, the media and the broader community.

Ultimately, teachers want a genuine say when it comes to decisions about their teaching. And they want to know the community supports them and values their work.

– ref. Victorian teachers are on strike for the first time in 13 years – it’s about more than pay – https://theconversation.com/victorian-teachers-are-on-strike-for-the-first-time-in-13-years-its-about-more-than-pay-278977

How reducing ‘just in case’ purchases can help avoid empty shelves and fuel bowsers

By -

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jennifer Macklin (Downes), Senior Research Fellow, BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash University

If you’ve topped up your tank at a petrol station recently, did it feel like you were “panic buying”? Or did it feel more like “I’d better buy some, just in case”?

During the COVID pandemic, our research team wrote about the psychological drivers behind Australians buying up toilet paper: scarcity mindset, anticipated regret and regaining “control”. We also warned that politicians or media coverage rebuking people for buying more at the supermarkets actually risked making it worse.

Over recent weeks, some senior politicians have repeated this mistake, berating people as “un-Australian” for “panic buying” fuel.

But one of the lessons we should have learnt from COVID – when supermarket shelves were cleared and some buying limits had to be introduced – is that most people didn’t perceive themselves as “panic buyers”.

‘Just in case’ shoppers

A 2020 survey asked 450 people in the United States and Australia “to what extent did you engage in panic buying in the first few months of the COVID-19 outbreak?”. On average, both the older US participants and mostly university-aged Australians participants scored themselves as only having “low engagement” in panic buying.

A smaller UK study published in 2022 found similar results, concluding “‘panic buying’ is not a useful concept”.

Instead, Australian and other shoppers during COVID saw buying a bit extra as playing it safe, rather than panicking.

Many Australians have lingering memories of times when supply has struggled to meet demand: from banana prices jumping from A$2 a kilogram to $15 a kilo after Cyclone Larry in 2006, to struggling to find eggs last year due to bird flu.

With little sign of the Strait of Hormuz being safe for oil tankers anytime soon, it’s entirely rational for people to think “I’d better get petrol now, before the price jumps further” – sooner than we might have refilled normally.

But when enough people buy more “just in case”, all those individual choices can collectively overwhelm our fuel and food systems.

Read more: Panic buying just makes shortages worse. Why do people do it anyway?

‘A few extras’ can empty shelves

Australia has spent decades pursuing lean supply chains – what’s known as “just-in-time” supplies, with minimal buffer stock sitting around in warehouses.

It’s a hyper-efficient system that uses sophisticated demand forecasting to keep costs low. But it also assumes that tomorrow will look exactly like today.

Supply chains here and in many other countries are now optimised for predictable demand, rather than surges in demand.

In March 2020, market research group Kantar analysed the shopping habits of more than 100,000 UK consumers. It found only a small minority of people were buying far more than usual. For instance, only 3% of shoppers were stockpiling far more packets of pasta than usual.

But a significant number of consumers were adding just a few extra products and shopping more often than usual. Kantar concluded those “just a few extras” shoppers were inadvertently emptying shelves.

For our supply systems to keep working today, we need to resist the instinct to buy more fuel or other essentials than usual – unless there’s a genuine need, like residents in Queensland and the Northern Territory needing supplies before Cyclone Narelle hit.

Buying just what you need

Our work in behavioural theory suggests two approaches that would help Australia avoid repeating some of the mistakes of the early COVID response.

First, we need to highlight what the majority are doing. Focusing on the minority – those emptying shelves of jerry cans at Bunnings – can accidentally create a powerful, negative social norm that can amplify hoarding behaviour.

Most Australians are still buying petrol and shopping as normal. Highlighting sensible behaviour normalises and stabilises it.

Two cars at a largely empty petrol station

While some regional petrol stations have reported fuel shortages, it’s still business as usual for in many parts of metropolitan Australia – like this inner Brisbane petrol station on Monday March 23, 2026. Liz Minchin/The Conversation, CC BY

Second, we should appeal to people’s collective responsibility. This means emphasising the need for collective effort to keep supplies available for everyone. Bringing values of shared responsibility to mind can encourage more considered choices.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese appears to have realised this. Talking about surging fuel demand late last week, he put greater emphasis on what “a good Australian” would do:

My message to Australians is please do not take more fuel than you need […] It’s the Australian way to think of others, to think of their neighbours, their community and also to think of the national interest. Only take what you need.

At the same time, we also need to build greater responsiveness into our fuel and food distribution systems, balancing efficiency with resilience.

The real lesson of empty petrol stations or supermarket shelves isn’t that people are irrational. It’s that perfectly rational individual behaviour can overwhelm a fragile system.

Until more resilient systems are in place in future, we can all play our part to keep essentials like petrol and food in stock, by shifting from a “just in case” mentality to “just take what you need”.

Read more: It’s not hoarding: farmers need to buy huge amounts of diesel to keep our food secure

– ref. How reducing ‘just in case’ purchases can help avoid empty shelves and fuel bowsers – https://theconversation.com/how-reducing-just-in-case-purchases-can-help-avoid-empty-shelves-and-fuel-bowsers-278307

Oil reserves last for weeks. Solar panels last for decades

By -

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Andrew Blakers, Professor of Engineering, Australian National University

Oil and gas prices are shooting up as war in the Middle East cuts down the supply of fossil fuels available, in what has been described as “the largest supply disruption in the history of oil markets”.

There have been several major upheavals in energy markets since 2020, including the COVID pandemic, Russia’s ongoing war on Ukraine, and US President Donald Trump’s trade and tariff war with much of the world.

What now? The closest historical comparison may be to the oil shock of the 1970s, which prompted significant moves by governments around the world to reduce the demand for fossil fuels.

This time around, things are different: relatively cheap, widely available renewable energy technology means not only governments but also companies and individuals can reduce their own reliance on fossil fuels, permanently.

The traditional case for renewables

Compared to what we get from fossil fuels, renewable energy is clean, cheap and reliable.

Solar and wind can provide virtually unlimited energy without greenhouse emissions. They also eliminate smog, strip mining, gas fracking, oil spills and oil-related warfare – not to mention avoiding the radioactive waste, accidents and weapons proliferation that go hand in hand with nuclear power.

Renewables have low requirements for raw materials, land and water. Waste from solar farms is about 1,000 times smaller than the avoided carbon dioxide from burning equivalent fossil fuels.

These technologies also come out ahead on price. Solar and wind have provided virtually all new power plant capacity in Australia over the past decade.

At a global level, solar and wind are being installed five times faster than everything else combined. This is compelling market-based evidence of their low cost.

The reliability test also favours renewables. In recent years, Australia’s shaky fleet of ageing coal power stations has become a substantial threat to grid stability. In contrast, solar and wind are very predictable, because thousands of collectors spread over a million square kilometres greatly reduces the impact of collector malfunctions and local weather.

Electric vehicles are making inroads for consumers and also heavy industry. Netze / Unsplash

Energy from solar and wind can be stored and released on demand via batteries and pumped hydro projects such as Snowy 2.0.

Consumer electric vehicles are also taking off, and heavy transport is not far behind. In China, electric truck sales have reached parity with diesel trucks. In Australia, major companies such as Fortescue are on track to drastically cut their emissions.

The spike in the price of gas following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 had a major effect on Australian energy prices because the companies exporting Australian gas charged Australian consumers world parity prices. However, apart from 2022, Australian electricity wholesale market price is unchanged over the past decade, while the renewables fraction increased from 17% to 42%.

Renewables make us more resilient

If we “electrify everything” – transport, heating and industry – clean electricity can replace most gas heating and imports of petroleum products (which cost Australia A$53 billion in 2025). This would double Australia’s electricity demand and reduce greenhouse emissions by three quarters.

At the domestic level, an all-electric home with solar panels can have no bill for gas or petrol, and a low bill for electricity. Energy storage is available via hot water tanks, electric vehicles and home batteries.

Energy from rooftop solar works out costing around 5 cents per kilowatt-hour, a fraction of the retail price.

Rooftop solar can have big benefits for homeowners. Raze / Unsplash

If grid power fails or fossil fuel prices soar, solar-powered homeowners can carry on indefinitely with nearly normal house operation.

Once an international disruption of oil and gas supply lasts for a month or so, it becomes a big problem for Australia as reserves are depleted and prices spike. In contrast, solar panels, wind turbines, transmission, batteries, pumped hydro, electric vehicles, electric heat pumps and electric furnaces last for decades – so we have much more time to see any disruption coming and work around it

And in a darker possibility, a decentralised energy system based on thousands of solar and wind farms and millions of solar rooftops would be far more resilient against military attacks than a few coal and nuclear power stations.

War, trade war and pandemics

Nobody knows the ramifications of the latest war in the Middle East. In the short term, prices for oil and gas have risen sharply.

The fundamental difference this time round is that individuals, companies and countries have remarkably cheap clean energy alternatives available.

Australia is rapidly decarbonising its electricity grid by replacing coal and gas with solar and wind. The government target is 82% renewable electricity by 2030. Gas heating is being actively discouraged in favour of electric heat pumps, and electric cars and trucks are being encouraged.

Alongside lower emissions, lower cost and greater reliability, a rapid transition to clean energy also means greater resilience in an unpredictable future. In the long run, the most important outcome of the current wars might be an acceleration of the world’s move away from fossil fuels.

– ref. Oil reserves last for weeks. Solar panels last for decades – https://theconversation.com/oil-reserves-last-for-weeks-solar-panels-last-for-decades-278895

Hospital audit finds siblings of children with serious conditions are overlooked, lack support

By -

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Julie Blamires, Senior Nursing Lecturer, Auckland University of Technology

Imagine spending years living on the edge of your family’s story.

You know something is wrong with your brother or sister. You see the hospital visits and medication routines, the quiet worry on your parents’ faces. You piece things together from overheard conversations, wondering whether what you feel is normal and whether anyone notices what you are missing.

This is the lived reality for millions of siblings of children with long-term health conditions worldwide. In the United States, up to 30% of children grow up with a sibling who has a chronic condition such as epilepsy, cystic fibrosis, childhood cancer or cerebral palsy.

In Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia the statistics are comparable. The ASB national health survey 2022 found two in five (45%) Australian children live with at least one chronic condition.

New Zealand doesn’t have a single definitive data set but the 2023 household disability survey identified 98,000 disabled children, with asthma alone affecting 15–20% of children. When the full range of long-term conditions is considered, the number of children growing up alongside an affected sibling is likely similar to that seen in the US and Australia.

Research consistently shows the impact extends well beyond the child who is unwell.

Siblings experience higher anxiety, disrupted schooling, social isolation and major changes to family life. Yet as our work with a sibling advisory group shows, siblings remain largely invisible in clinical settings designed to support families.

They frequently sit on the sidelines while conversations happen around them rather than with them. Doctors speak to parents. Parents speak to the child with the condition. Siblings are watching and worrying but receive little direct information.

Many describe feeling overlooked or ignored during appointments and left to make sense of situations without language to understand them.

Lack of sibling support at children’s hospitals

To find out how well children’s hospitals in New Zealand and Australia support siblings, we looked not at policy documents or mission statements, but at what siblings and families can realistically access.

We audited major children’s hospital websites across both countries. Using the search term “sibling”, we examined whether any material was genuinely written for siblings, rather than for parents or clinicians. The findings were disappointing.

In New Zealand, only Starship Children’s Hospital returned search results. Of 54 results, just two grief booklets were remotely relevant, but both were still written mainly for parents.

Kidz First, Te Wao Nui and Whangārei Hospital provided nothing for siblings.

Across Australia, provision was uneven. Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network and the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne offered sibling‑specific material, while Queensland Children’s Hospital, Monash Children’s Hospital and Perth Children’s Hospital had little.

Even where material existed, siblings were rarely the intended audience. Most information targeted parents or mentioned siblings briefly within family resources. When siblings were acknowledged, it was in the context of grief, not the everyday reality of growing up alongside a brother or sister with a long‑term condition.

Beyond the hospital bed

In contrast, some of the richest and most thoughtful support sat outside the hospital system altogether.

Charities and non-governmental organisations such as Siblings Australia, Canteen Australia, Drenched, Kidshealth and New Zealand’s Parent2Parent offered age-appropriate information, peer support programmes, camps and opportunities for siblings to connect with others like them.

These supports matter deeply but are rarely signposted by healthcare teams and many families are unaware they exist.

For the young people we work with, these findings are unsurprising. Members of our sibling advisory group describe having felt invisible in clinical spaces, excluded from conversations about their sibling’s health, and left to fill in the gaps alone.

Research echoes this experience, showing restricted hospital access and information filtered through parents leave siblings confused and distressed.

What siblings are asking for

Siblings want clear, honest information about their sibling’s condition, shared in ways that match their age and understanding. They want to be included, not managed out of the room.

They want clinicians to recognise that this is their experience, too. Evidence shows when siblings receive accurate and timely information, anxiety decreases and fears about their own health or the future lessen.

Many want opportunities to connect with peers. These are not extraordinary requests. They are the foundations of good child and family care, recognising the whole family, not only the child in the hospital bed.

International reviews from Canada and elsewhere show similar findings to our audit, with sibling‑focused support scarce, poorly integrated and often invisible to families.

Researchers in Sweden, Canada, Australia and New Zealand are now working together to ask siblings aged five to 18 what information they need and how they would prefer to receive it, with the aim of improving sibling‑specific resources.

The message from research, practice and young people is clear. Siblings are an afterthought in systems organised around patients and parents.

For clinicians, change starts by acknowledging siblings and offering age‑appropriate explanations. For hospitals, it means ensuring sibling‑specific resources are visible.

Sibling‑inclusive care is not optional. For every child waiting outside a clinic room, watching their brother or sister disappear through doors they cannot follow, it is the right thing to do.

With thanks to research assistant Jess Gardiner and the young people who make up the New Zealand siblings advisory group.

– ref. Hospital audit finds siblings of children with serious conditions are overlooked, lack support – https://theconversation.com/hospital-audit-finds-siblings-of-children-with-serious-conditions-are-overlooked-lack-support-278889

Half of psychologists assessing for ADHD don’t follow the diagnostic guidelines, new study shows

By -

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Clare O’Toole, Clinical Psychology Phd Candidate, University of Wollongong

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a condition that develops during childhood and affects 6–10% of kids and 2–6% of adults.

People with ADHD have either mainly inattentive symptoms (such as lacking concentration), mainly hyperactive and impulsive symptoms (such as speaking or acting without thinking), or a combination of the two.

Two people with ADHD can have very different symptoms and experiences. So it’s important for clinicians who diagnose the condition to have the right knowledge and expertise.

But our new research found half of psychologists who assess for ADHD don’t follow the diagnostic guidelines or criteria.

This means less-typical presentations of ADHD – such as in women and girls, quiet inattentive adults and high-achieving students – could be overlooked.

How is ADHD diagnosed?

ADHD is currently diagnosed by a psychologist, psychiatrist, or paediatrician. Queensland GPs can also diagnose ADHD, with more states and territories to follow.

ADHD can’t be diagnosed with a blood test or other single measure. It requires the consideration of multiple factors and information sources, along with clinical judgement.

Australia’s evidence-based practice guideline for ADHD, released in 2022, provides a clear standard for assessment and treatment. It recommends ADHD assessments include a full developmental, mental health and medical history.

Medical assessments should be used to rule out other factors which could look like ADHD, such as sensory impairment, thyroid disease, anaemia, or medication side effects.

The clinician must also consider the social, psychological and clinical context of a person’s symptoms. This requires input from more than one setting and person such as a teacher or family member. The assessment shouldn’t rely solely on questionnaires or looking at the person.

The diagnosis of ADHD should be made in line with diagnostic criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (the DSM 5) or the International Classification of Disease (the ICD). These require impairments that are out of step with the person’s age, that began before they were 12, and that have impacts across multiple settings, such as home and school or work.

In practice, a comprehensive ADHD assessment could include:

  • interviews with a person and a family member covering their history and current situation
  • review of school reports
  • completion of questionnaires to assist in clarifying the diagnosis
  • investigation of any medical issues which may be causing ADHD-like symptoms.

Our study

Our recent study used an online questionnaire of 322 Australian psychologists involved in diagnosing and treating ADHD. We wanted to see how they were assessing for it, if that matched the Australian guidelines, and how well they knew the diagnostic criteria.

The study was limited to psychologists due to the low number of responses from psychiatrists and paediatricians, and because there are many more psychologists than other specialists.

The study relies on anonymous self-reported data. This reduced the likelihood that only the most confident people would participate, or that clinicians would be focused on looking good.

But there’s a chance the psychologists might not remember their assessments accurately, or apply as much effort to the questionnaire as they would to a client.

What we found

Three in four psychologists said they always followed guidelines, with more saying they followed them some of the time. But overall, fewer than half reported assessment practices that actually followed the guidelines.

This suggests people seeking an assessment can’t rely on a clinician’s assurance they’re following the guidelines and need to ask specifically what’s involved.

Almost all psychologists used client interviews and gathered a developmental history. However, only three in four completed a mental health assessment. Less than one in three assessed for other illnesses. None reported performing a sensory assessment.

This makes it much more difficult to instead diagnose a different condition or rule out other potential causes for symptoms.

Next, we gave psychologists in the study a list of the ADHD criteria, and another item from the specific learning disorder criteria (difficulties with learning and using academic skills).

While ADHD is associated with lower grades at school, it’s not a requirement for diagnosis. Someone may meet the criteria for ADHD without experiencing difficulties learning. Kids with a specific learning disorder can also have ADHD, and it’s important these learning difficulties are also detected.

But fewer than one in three psychologists surveyed correctly identified all the ADHD criteria and also rejected the non-ADHD item. This means people who do well in school but struggle in other areas of their life might miss out on a diagnosis.

Likewise, four in ten clinicians did not recognise that symptoms needed to be out of step for the person’s age and stage of development for a diagnosis. This could mean people are diagnosed when they don’t actually fit the criteria.

Overall, these inconsistencies mean people whose symptoms overlap with anxiety, depression, trauma, sleep problems, thyroid problems, hearing or vision issues, or learning disorders are at greater risk of being misdiagnosed or missing out on helpful support.

What should I look for if I’m seeking an assessment?

If you’re concerned about ADHD symptoms for yourself or your child, discuss your concerns with your GP and find out what services are available in your area.

The wait times and costs for assessments can vary widely, so compare your options before committing to an assessment.

If you’re interested in exploring medications, you will need to visit a paediatrician, psychiatrist or, in some states and territories, a GP, as psychologists aren’t able to prescribe medications.

To make sure you or your child is being properly assessed, look at the guidelines and ask before booking what’s involved in the assessment.

– ref. Half of psychologists assessing for ADHD don’t follow the diagnostic guidelines, new study shows – https://theconversation.com/half-of-psychologists-assessing-for-adhd-dont-follow-the-diagnostic-guidelines-new-study-shows-277957

Mary Shelley is often underestimated on screen – does The Bride! finally get her right?

By -

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Fiona Wilkes, PhD Candidate, School of Humanities, The University of Western Australia

Ostensibly, Maggie Gyllenhaal’s second film, The Bride! offers a reimagining of the 1936 film The Bride of Frankenstein, in which the bride appears only briefly and does not say a single word.

This is undoubtedly rectified in Gyllenhaal’s version.

From the afterlife, Mary Shelley (Jessie Buckley) seeks a body through which to insert herself. She chooses the body of Ida (also Buckley), an escort entangled in the seedy world of crime boss Mr Lupino (Zlatko Burić) in 1930s Chicago.

After Mary forces Ida to perform a shouting outburst in front of Lupino, she is sent careening down the stairs, breaking her neck. Shortly thereafter, she is dug up from her pauper’s grave by Frankenstein (Christian Bale) and Dr Euphronious (Annette Bening).

Euphronious reanimates Ida and Mary, too, reappears.

This film offers less a story about the bride of Frankenstein, and more a commentary on the lesser-known sad second life of Mary Shelley – and all she might have said if she had the chance to rewrite Frankenstein, and her life.

Who was Mary Shelley?

Shelley is generally remembered as a kind of wunderkind.

Born in 1797 to esteemed writers William Godwin and Mary Wollstonecraft, married to the esteemed poet Percy Bysshe Shelley, she is famed for writing the first science fiction novel when she was just a teenager.

Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus was published in 1818 when she was 20, just two years after she began writing the story on a fateful night in Geneva. It tells the story of an ambitious young scientist, Victor Frankenstein, who plays God with devastating consequences. He succeeds in making a man from the remnants of corpses, only to abandon his creation when he sees how monstrous it is.

The novel went on to become one of the most famous works of English literature.

This is not a simple story of a teenage girl turned creative genius. Shelley, aged just 18, had already eloped with a married man, suffered the death of a daughter, and given birth to a son.

Frankenstein was not born from a girlish wondering at the world, but rather was clawed from her grief and rage.

Within a year of Frankenstein’s publication, Shelley had buried three children and given birth to a fourth. She was just 21 years old.

Shelley’s later works were largely ignored. But at various points in the 200-plus years since Frankenstein’s publication, Shelly has been called a radical, a feminist and the mother of science fiction. She has also been called a heretic, an adulterer and “as mad as her hero”.

Mary in The Bride! is haggard, lit in a way that highlights undereye circles and the few lines Buckley has on her face. Her mouth is often downturned into a scowl, except when she releases a humourless laugh. There is nothing funny about this Mary. This is a Mary who has lived a hard life.

Depictions of Mary Shelley

This is not the Mary Shelley we know from other film versions.

The 1931 film The Bride of Frankenstein is introduced by Mary Shelley (Elsa Lanchester), when she tells Lord Byron and Percy Shelley the tale she first told them in the 1931 film, Frankenstein, has a second part.

The film is actually startling removed from its source material, and here, Mary is prim and dressed all in white. Byron commands the room; Percy writes – Mary embroiders. When she is asked to look at the storm raging outside the room, she declines, saying “You know how lightning alarms me.”

Mary, in this version, is sweet, mild-mannered and moral.

Mary Shelley (2017) saw a fresh-faced Elle Fanning playing the author from girlhood to grief-stricken motherhood.

For the majority of the film, Mary is youthful and energetic, endlessly inspired and writing at all hours of the day. Her love affair with Percy is a key plot point. Much of the film is spent dealing with the low expectations of her by the men she is surrounded by in Geneva.

Neither film offers a particularly flattering representation. In both, Shelley is at the mercy of her husband.

In The Bride of Frankenstein, Mary cannot so much as light a candle without the aid of “Shelley, darling”. The 2017 film suggests Mary wrote Frankenstein as a way of pointing out Percy’s flaws to him through the character of Victor Frankenstein.

But The Bride! asks viewers not only to reconsider what they know of Frankenstein, his monster, and his monster’s bride, but the woman we remember through them.

This Mary is a possessor, a demon. She says during her lifetime, she couldn’t say all she wanted to – in life and in her work. Now, she will take the chance, by any means necessary.

Ida refuses to be silenced. She is often seen screaming and thrashing about. Her mouth is dyed black by an inky substance, highlighting how often it is open.

Through Ida, Mary gets to call out the bad behaviour of the men who want girls like Ida, and, by extension, Mary, to be quiet. To be a good girl. To be placid and sweet and unable to light their own candles. Mary uses Ida to – literally – hold a gun to their heads and make them apologise for their behaviour, paving the way for a wave of women to fight back against the patriarchal structures that have bound both Ida and Mary.

Here, finally, we have the Mary who could stitch together literature’s favourite monster, rather than a pretty sampler.

– ref. Mary Shelley is often underestimated on screen – does The Bride! finally get her right? – https://theconversation.com/mary-shelley-is-often-underestimated-on-screen-does-the-bride-finally-get-her-right-278547

Our Changing World: The tree keepers

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

Aaron Hewson has been studying the genetics of the trees in the orchard. RNZ / Claire Concannon

Follow Our Changing World on Apple, Spotify, iHeartRadio or wherever you listen to your podcasts.

The lines of apple trees look lush and healthy, some garlanded with a heavy crop of coloured orbs – greens, bright reds, yellow-striped. For some, the variety is apparent even on the same tree, hosting, as these trees are, two to three different apple cultivars.

And keeping this variety alive is the whole point of this orchard.

The Jim Dunckley Heritage Orchard

Ann Dunckley remembers her dad stopping to look at apple trees at the side of the road or in old orchards when they were out and about. “He liked apples,” she says, “And he was worried about the fact that the old ones were disappearing, old farm orchards were being bulldozed.”

Jim was a founding member of the Coastal Otago Branch of the New Zealand Tree Crops Association and, along with friend Paul Snyder, he started collecting different varieties of apple trees in the 1990s.

Unfortunately, Jim has passed away but the orchard lives on, having moved to a site near Mount Cargill just outside of Dunedin city, in the early 2000s.

Ann Dunckley’s father Jim established the heritage orchard, and Paul Snyder helped him to gather trees from around Otago. RNZ / Claire Concannon

Here, neat rows of about 300 root stock apple trees have different cultivars, or varieties, grafted on to them. The root stock trees are clones, chosen for their growth and disease resistance characteristics. Each cultivar is also a clone grafted on, to maintain its genetics.

The idea is that the orchard acts like a living library. New growth or scion wood can be harvested off these trees, stored over winter and then grafted on to new root stock trees to replicate the cultivar.

However, across time, notes and labels were misplaced and uncertainty about the varieties crept in.

It was a chance encounter on an orchard open day that would provide the solution.

The Jim Dunckley Heritage Orchard in Dunedin RNZ / Claire Concannon

Science to the rescue

It was their first orchard open day in 2023 that kicked it all off, says Donal Ferguson. Until recently Donal was the chair of the Coastal Otago Branch of the New Zealand Tree Crops Association. Associate Professor Lynette Brownfield from the University of Otago’s Biochemistry department came along and when she learned about the identification problem, she offered up a solution – genetic testing.

Masters student Aaron Hewson was given the task. Starting with 336 leaf samples, he used genetic analysis to compare the varieties in the orchard to those in the Bioeconomy Science Institute’s heritage orchard records. Some of them matched genetically, but were labelled differently, so he was forced to go further afield.

Luckily there has been a lot of work overseas looking into heritage apples, including compiling genetic and physical trait databases. Aaron was able to use these as a “gold standard” reference to compare his samples against.

To the team’s surprise, 80 percent of the samples matched with apple tree cultivars in this database and some of them were duplicates.

The remaining 20 percent are likely seedlings, says Aaron. While grafting an apple tree creates a clone that is genetically identical, it is quite different if you grow a tree from seed, says Aaron. “They’re quite a genetically diverse species. So, if you cross any two apples together and get a seed, it’s going to look very different to the parents. It’s going to be a random mix up.”

It’s a bit trickier to identify seedlings then, because that means working backwards to figure out a ‘family tree’ for the apple that traces back to the varieties in the database.

But these seedlings might also represent the interesting variety that the orchard was aiming to conserve – apples with desirable traits that grow well in Coastal Otago conditions.

Aaron Hewson checks the ID tag on one of the trees in the orchard. RNZ / Claire Concannon

It’s these traits that Aaron finds interesting to think about. For commercial growing, breeders are focused on characteristics like storage, resistance to bruising and disease, or a certain colour or crispness. But this orchard contains a much wider variety of colour, texture and flavours than can be found in our supermarket apples.

Now, thanks to the research, these varieties can be confidently shared with whoever might want to grow them.

Sign up to the Our Changing World monthly newsletter for episode backstories, science analysis and more.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

NZ cricketers back new T20 league “You’re playing the game for the fans”

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

Jimmy Neesham. Andrew Cornaga/www.photosport.nz

New Zealand’s top cricketers are happy a decision has been made about the future of the domestic T20 competition and are looking forward to its development.

On Monday New Zealand Cricket decided to push ahead with a proposed NZ20 franchise league rather than entering into an expanded Australian Big Bash competition.

That immediately resulted in former international Dion Nash resigning from the board of New Zealand Cricket, saying he could no longer support the organisation’s direction.

However the players are backing the decision.

Black Caps allrounder Jimmy Neesham said a local improved competition was always their preferred option.

Neesham, who has played franchise cricket around the world, is happy there is now clarity and that all stake-holders are moving in the same direction.

“It is an exciting time for New Zealand cricket and hopefully we can move things forward quickly towards next summer,” Neesham said.

“It keeps things home-grown and in-house. The great thing about the development of players in this country is the ability to rub shoulders with international players (which) really accelerates a young players development.”

Neesham said competitions like The Hundred in Britain and the SA20 in South Africa have helped grow the game in those countries.

“At the end of the day you’re playing the game for the fans, in front of the fans.”

The Blaze players celebrate a wicket in the Super Smash. Marty Melville / PHOTOSPORT

New Zealand’s top female players compete in two domestic competitions each summer, the Supersmash (T20) and the Hallyburton Johnstone Shield 50-over competition.

Only a couple of the games top players are involved in overseas franchise leagues.

White Fern Brooke Halliday said it was important that women’s teams would be a part of the proposed new competition.

“The biggest thing for us is making sure domestic cricket for women in New Zealand is going in the right direction and we’re not going to be going back,” Halliday said.

“So having those consistent games and also competitive games is really important to us as a unit.”

NZC chair Diana Puketapu-Lyndon said the Board’s decision wasn’t a final commitment, it allows NZC to advance discussions toward a potential licence and a binding commercial arrangement.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Road rage of a different kind: How cranes and trucks are feeling jammed up

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

A truck transports wood in Wellington. RNZ / Angus Dreaver

Angry truckers have banded together with bus, crane and even combine harvester operators to hit out over rules they say make it too hard to get bigger, more efficient vehicles on the road and easily move them round.

They want far-reaching change to the 23-year-old ‘Rule’ around the size, weight and permitting system for heavy vehicles.

They said in a hardhitting letter to the Transport Agency (NZTA) that the old Rule was blocking safer, more efficient vehicles from easily being imported, envisaging a near future when the maximum 58 tonne diesel trucks were scaled up to 62 tonne electric (which allowed for the battery).

“The level of anger from our members and the risk of more pronounced public responses during an election year should not be underestimated if tangible progress is not made,” said a letter from 11 heavy vehicle associations to the Transport Agency’s chair late last month.

Transport Minister Chris Bishop promised last June the government would be “taking the handbrake off productivity through transport rule reform” – and on Monday said he heard operators “loud and clear when they tell us there are more changes they’d like to see”.

The operators had earlier talked of feeling fobbed off, though the Transport Agency late last week offered them another meeting, for Tuesday this week.

“While responsibility is often framed as sitting with the Ministry, NZTA has long led sector engagement and provided all technical advice to the Ministry and ministers. Recent ministerial correspondence shows the full extent of the lack of progress is not well understood,” their letter said.

“We seem to get pushed from pillar to post,” said signatory Dom Kalasih, head of Transporting NZ that represented 1100 firms, mostly truckers.

Dom Kalasih, head of Transporting NZ. RNZ / Phil Pennington

Crane operators, who also signed, said the old rules were holding everyone up.

“Getting a crane out for a job, the … permit and exemption process, goodness, for a large crane operation, we’re talking hours, hours a day ,” said Sarah Toase of the Crane Association.

Their next stop would be to seek a meeting with the minister, the associations told RNZ.

Bishop said the rules would be modernised.

“Important research and policy work is underway to carefully consider those ideas,” he said in a statement. “This is a complicated area and not everything can be done all at the same time.”

The question of how fast remained open though the first changes under reform were due this coming July.

‘Complex safety, infrastructure and cost considerations’

The Transport Ministry pushed back on the industry group criticism.

“Many of the changes sought by industry – particularly those enabling significantly larger or heavier vehicles – raise complex safety, infrastructure and cost considerations,” it told RNZ.

Research had to be done on the impacts on roads and what additional infrastructure investment may be required, it added.

However, the industry said “frustration … is now acute”.

The agency was unnecessarily outsourcing analysis to consultants, even though the reform’s ambition had been scaled back.

It talked of batteries and extra safety tech being blocked by the old rules.

“In some cases, safety features are being compromised to manage weight.”

Bishop had got their hopes up last year.

“Instead, the work programme was underwhelming in scope and subsequently reduced, leaving industry with no confidence that meaningful change is being prioritised.”

Transport Minister Chris Bishop. RNZ/Marika Khabazi

The reform is of what is called ‘the Rule’, the main VDAM or Vehicle Dimensions and Mass rule.

One core change being proposed was to remove the permits on trucks between 44 and 50 tonnes.

These big trucks would still have to fit the weight and design limits of what is called the ’50MAX’ class – and would still have to stick to certain roads and bridges – but they would not have to get an actual permit, as they have done since 2013 when the High Productivity Motor Vehicle (HPMV) regime was introduced. HPMV’s advent was the biggest change in the Rule.

Electronic monitoring of trucks was now widespread and would help keep them to approved routes that were strong enough, a source said.

Another proposal in the reforms would make it cheaper to comply for the likes of electric buses now tipping the scales at over a seven tonne threshold because of their batteries.

Cranes caught in the Rule

Toase told RNZ it was not enough.

Sarah Toase of the Crane Association. Supplied / Crane Association

Cranes were “always being dealt with in retrospect” and were routinely having to seek exemptions from narrow rules designed for regular trucks just to operate, she said.

They had tried to build change, for instance, through a trial that succeeded in cutting by a fifth how far overweight mobile cranes had to travel, reducing congestion and emissions.

“We’ve sent all the information through to NZTA and it’s just sitting there.”

Another example she gave was that many mobile cranes were now often failing brake tests under an electronic inspection regime.

“It doesn’t produce accurate results for cranes because they are engineered differently. So cranes are failing those tests, which means they are then deemed not roadworthy.

“They’ve failed compliance and they can’t be used.”

Operators then had to revert to manual testing in order to pass, which all took time.

Federated Farmers and Rural Contractors NZ also signed the letter.

Combine harvesters, for instance, faced very restrictive limits on what bridges they could cross which should be managed in a much less complex way, said another source.

“We’re not just talking about road freight, we’re talking about harvesting of food.”

Combine harvesters work on crops in Southland. Cosmo Kentish-Barnes

At the trucking coalface, the old Rule meant heavily specced new vehicles could not be easily imported as-is but needed bespoke modifications, in a market that was already isolated due to being minority righthand drive, the letter said.

The industry ideal for keeping up internationally, allowing for the state of NZ’s roads, was to lift the 58-tonne HPMV limit to 62 tonnes, Kalasih said.

At 62 tonnes they would not be much bigger to overtake, and the distribution of weight between the axles would spread the impact on the road, he said.

The AA did not want to comment on that from a car driver’s point of view.

‘Totally at odds’

Consultation has opened on phase two of the reform following on from phase one that began last October.

But the meetings with officials earlier this year were a final straw for the industry associations.

“The scope of that work is frankly incredibly underwhelming and lacks ambition,” said Kalasih.

“It seems to us totally at odds with what Minister Bishop has asked for.”

They felt the time was up on more reviews, research and meetings, and they were tired of being passed from NZTA to the MOT and back, he said.

But MOT said the latest research was a “necessary step to ensure that any larger changes are safe, durable, and deliver real benefits to industry and the wider transport system”.

Other changes are going on into bridge designs, which determine what weight of trucks can pass, although NZTA has played down how that work would alter old or new bridges.

NZTA said it understood the impact of the Rule’s settings on the industry.

“This is why we are engaging with industry representatives to understand the specific challenges they are facing, and the opportunities which they see for improvement,” it said in a statement.

NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi chair Simon Bridges, in a letter responding to the associations, acknowledged their concerns, telling them the minister made the rules and offering another meeting on Tuesday this week.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Waihī Estuary has original name Te Heriheri restored as part of wetland project

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

Iwi members and local stakeholders at the unveiling of the new sign restoring the name Te Heriheri to the Waihī estuary. Supplied/Te Wahapū o Waihī

An estuary near Maketu in Bay of Plenty has had its original name Te Heriheri restored as part of an iwi-led project to restore the health of the entire wetland ecosystem.

Te Wahapū o Waihī – the collective of Ngāti Whakahemo, Ngāti Whakaue, Ngāti Mākino, Ngāti Pikiao and Tapuika – was established by the iwi and hapū of Waihī Estuary to restore and protect the health and mauri of the wai.

The collective works with a range of organisations, including Bay of Plenty Regional Council, the Ministry for the Environment, local landowners, the Waihī Drainage Society and community members.

Project lead Professor Kura Paul-Burke (Ngāti Whakahemo, Ngāti Mākino, Ngāti Awa) told RNZ one of the factors that contributed to the poor condition of the estuary was the four freshwater contributors, which once were rivers, were now straightened canals carrying polluted sediment loads straight from the land and human activities into the estuary.

“We purchased 30 hectares of dairy farm to convert to wetland and salt marsh. And the reason we did that was we wanted to build a korowai of wetlands around our estuary, because our estuary, Te Wahapū o Waihī, is one of the top five most degraded estuaries in the country. It does not meet safe swimming guidelines. It has permanent public health warning signs for our kaimoana, our shellfish.

“High nitrogen, phosphorus loads enter the estuary with E. coli levels consistently exceeding safe food consumption levels. So it’s in a very, very poor condition.”

Converting 30 hectares of dairy farm into wetland involved 160,000 native plants and fencing off 16 kilometers of waterways for riparian planting, she said.

It also involved working with local farmers to establish environmental plans in the upper catchment, she said.

Paul-Burke said all work to do with the environment was ongoing, but this part of the project ended in June of this year, and the hope was to then start building more wetlands around the estuary.

“The power of this project has been the five iwi coming together, working together alongside the Bay of Plenty Regional Council and Ministry for the Environment. But this project is led by iwi.”

The commissioning of a new pump station at the Waihī estuary. Supplied/Te Wahapū o Waihī

Last Friday iwi members and stakeholders gathered at the wetland to commission a new pump station and unveil a new sign which restored the area’s original name, Te Heriheri.

“We had farmers, the ratepayers association, the drainage society. We had Minister Tama Potaka, representatives from all of the five iwi and local communities because it’s better when we all work together and all of us have worked together,” Paul-Burke said.

She said it was a beautiful ceremony and a chance to acknowledge the original name of the area.

Paul-Burke said Te Heriheri was a seasonal settlement where Ngāti Whakahemo would stay in the spring and summer months to harvest resources for the coming winter.

“So for us Ngāti Whakahemo, we were once known as the net makers, and Te Heriheri or this wetland played a major role in our trading economy with our neighbouring other iwi or tribes.”

It was also an ecologically significant area in terms of the range of native species, including plants, birds, tuna and inanga, she said.

Te Wahapū o Waihī the Waihī estuary. Supplied/Te Wahapū o Waihī

While the 30 hectare wetland and salt marsh restoration was ongoing, restoration projects within the estuary had started, including with tuangi or cockles, pipi, and seagrass, Paul-Burke said.

“What we used was for a baseline for those kaimoana species, we use mātauranga Māori and/or the intergenerational transmission of environmental knowledge from our ancestors through to today. And so we interviewed kaumātua, and they have all since passed on, unfortunately.

“But we interviewed them and asked them, when you were young, where did you use to go to collect your pipi and your tuangi? And they talked about when they were children, which meant that someone older took them, their nanny, their koro, their parents, etc., which then traversed different generations of knowledge.”

With that mātauranga as a baseline and they mapped and surveyed the entire estuary. Standard marine surveys had only identified 16 hectares of pipi and tuangi in the estuary, the surveys based on mātauranga identified 30 hectares plus, she said.

“The power and importance of that intergenerational knowledge has identified that there were actually more kaimoana in our estuary than modern science has been able to access by over 50 percent.

“So we are hoping to develop a new way of surveying and monitoring pipi in particular alongside tuangi so that anyone, any whānau, hapū, iwi or communities across the motu, across the country, can do surveys themselves using this Mātauranga Māori approach.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Melbourne Storm say Eli Katoa may never play again

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

Eli Katoa received the injury during the Tonga and New Zealand Kiwis Pacific Championships match in Auckland. NRL Photos/Photosport

Tongan rugby league player Eliesa Katoa may never play the game again, according to Melbourne Storm coach Craig Bellamy.

Katoa had brain surgery in November as a result of head knocks he received during the Tonga and New Zealand Kiwis Pacific Championships match in Auckland.

The first was a head knock with a team mate during the pre-game warm up, followed by two more high hits during the match.

The 25 year old backrower was ruled out of the 2026 season but now Melbourne Storm coach Bellamy has revealed that Katoa may never return to the NRL.

“He’s doing really well at the moment,” Bellamy told Channel 7.

“I don’t know if he’ll play next year… I don’t know if he’ll play again.

“The doctors haven’t made that decision, and I don’t know when that decision will get made to be quite honest.

Melbourne Storm star Eli Katoa in the hospital following his injury after a test against New Zealand earlier this month. Instagram/Supplied

“I imagine after a certain amount of time he’ll have more tests and go from there. It was a major injury, and we want him to live the rest of his life in a normal way, so fingers crossed.”

As a part of his recovery Katoa has been working with the Melbourne Storm forward pack.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Will you get a solar rebate from your power company?

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

The Electricity Authority will soon require distributors to pay rebates to reward customers generating electricity, such as rooftop solar. Supplied/SolarZero

Electricity networks around the country will soon provide rebates for power exported during peak periods – but not every power company will pass those on to consumers directly.

From 1 April, the Electricity Authority will require distributors to pay rebates to reward customers generating electricity, such as rooftop solar, when the power network faces highest demand.

Vector was offering 5.24c per kWh for 7am to 11am export in June, July and August and 5pm to 10pm export in May through to September. WEL Networks is offering 6.35c per kWh from 7am to 9.30am and 5.30 to 8pm between 1 June and 31 August. Powerco is offering 7c on weekdays from 7am to 11am and 5pm to 8pm between 1 April and 30 September. Scanpower’s rebate reaches 13c.

Power companies separately offered their own prices to customers exporting power, and these could vary a lot.

The Electricity Authority said ensuring customers were fairly rewarded for supplying power to the network was part of its work programme.

“In January we announced the decision that electricity distribution businesses – lines companies – will need to pay rebates when households and small businesses supply power to the network at peak times, from April 1.

“This applies to those with a network connection size up to 45kVA and that can export up to 45kW of electricity back to the network.

“The electricity distribution companies’ rebates will be passed on to consumers through the electricity bills they receive from their retailer. While these rebates will be repackaged by the retailer, they may not be itemised on consumers’ power bills as a clear amount of money back. Some retailers itemise their bills more than others.”

Larger companies also needed to offer time-of-use pricing to encourage people to shift use to off-peak times.

Genesis chief revenue officer Stephen England-Hall said the company took into account distribution charges and rebates when it set its plans and pricing for customers.

“Customers on our day/night or other time-of-use plans typically benefit from lower network charges during off-peak periods, and these are already reflected in the appropriate tariffs.

“Effective from 1 July 2026, the Electricity Authority’s new regulations regarding export rebates will require retailers to offer time-varying plans that ‘provide a financial benefit’ to customers for export patterns that reduce pressure [on] the electricity system, including at peak times.

“Our range of products and plans will be updated to reflect this and enable customers to choose the one that suits them the best.

“We regularly review and update our pricing and product features, and will take the form and scale of these new rebates into account in this process.”

Mercury said it set buyback rates using a range of inputs including expected wholesale costs, network charges and network rebates. “We will factor these rebates into our time-of-use plans which we are due to launch in the next couple of months.”

Lisa Hannifin, chief customer officer at Meridian, said it offered customers 17c for solar export across all periods of the day.

“We’re pleased there are now more incentives available to encourage customers to export at peak times. We’re currently upgrading our billing system, which will allow for this new rebate to be incorporated into our solar plans and expect this will be reflected in our products from the middle of the year.”

At Octopus, chief operating officer Margaret Cooney said the full rebate should be passed on when it became available.

“The rebate will vary by network depending on what the circumstances are in that network and how much value they’re essentially getting based on the state of the grid and times of the year in which it’s of value to them.

“Some of them are much more generous than others, but we think it’s a great start. And I think one of the things that we hope to see is that networks learn that value of the distributed energy providing a more cost-effective solution rather than just building out more poles and wires.”

She said the rebates were intended to reward customers for what they were doing so it made sense to pass them on.

Sign up for Money with Susan Edmunds, a weekly newsletter covering all the things that affect how we make, spend and invest money.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Employers offering transport perks warned of tax rules

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

The price of 91 is now more than $3.30 a litre on average across the country, and forecast to rise further. RNZ / Dan Cook

Any businesses planning to offer extra support for their staff facing fuel cost rises will need to consider the tax implications.

Fuel prices have risen sharply in the past month as conflict in Iran has put pressure on oil supplies.

The price of 91 is now more than $3.30 a litre on average across the country, and forecast to rise further.

That adds to the cost of commuting – the Public Service Association earlier called for employers to allow staff to work from home to help offset the cost.

Deloitte tax partner Robyn Walker said any form of payment from an employer to an employee would generally be taxable through the PAYE system – even if it was a short-term fix for the petrol problem.

If it was offered in the form of goods or services, that could trigger fringe benefit tax.

But she said there were some exceptions for transport, which employers could consider.

The fringe benefit tax legislation has an exemption for ebikes, bikes, scooters and escooters provided by employers and used for commuting to work.

That means that as long as the employee is intending to use the bike mostly for commuting, it can be provided without needing to pay any fringe benefit tax (FBT).

She said there could also be significant benefits for employees taking a “salary sacrifice” arrangement.

This means their income is reduced by an amount equal to the cost of the bike. Because the cost of the bike was taken out of pre-tax income the final impact on the employee would be lower than if the bike was paid for out of after-tax income.

She said it could help someone afford a bike they might not otherwise be able to purchase. Some providers such as WorkRide and Northride have set up systems to streamline this process.

Another option is Extraordinary, which allows employers to offer public transport benefits either by salary sacrifice or as part of a total remuneration package, without attracting FBT.

This also has the potential to make public transport cheaper for employees.

Walker said employers could also start getting more claims for mileage from employees travelling for work in their own vehicles, where previously they might not have thought the administration was worth it.

“There are some quite detailed rules around how this works and generally ‘home to work’ travel can’t be reimbursed tax-free, but travel from home to a client – in excess of normal travel distances, or from work to a client is able to be paid tax exempt.

“Inland Revenue issues new reimbursement rates each year, which are based on historic costs. These are essentially a ‘safe harbour’, whereby they are comfortable that reimbursement at that level is reasonable; employers are not bound to use those rates, so could opt to pay a higher amount while fuel costs are high. This would need to be supported with some calculations to explain why the amount paid is reasonable.”

At present, the rate for a petrol car is $1.17 per kilometre.

“It is technically possible for an employer to provide tax-free allowances for employee transport costs in some limited circumstances. This exemption is targeted at scenarios where an employee’s commuting costs are more than what would ordinarily be expected – for example, if the employer operates in a remote location or if the location isn’t serviced by public transport and/or the employee is working hours where public transport isn’t available.”

Sign up for Money with Susan Edmunds, a weekly newsletter covering all the things that affect how we make, spend and invest money.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

How rising costs are reshaping New Zealand’s regional air links

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

The Regional Connectivity Fund provided $30 million in concessionary loans to allow some regional airlines to consolidate debt, refinance loans and invest in aircraft maintenance or upgrades. RNZ / Quin Tauetau

Explainer – Regional airlines across New Zealand are warning key air links are under growing pressure, as rising fuel and operating costs force tough decisions.

Westport is the latest town at risk of losing its only air connection and industry leaders warn it might not be the last.

Here’s what’s happening.

What changes have regional airlines made?

Originair is poised to scrap its Westport to Wellington route, unless it gets more government support, leaving the town without flights.

Air Chathams has introduced a $20 fuel surcharge per ticket citing “recent events in the Middle East impacting global fuel markets”.

Golden Bay Air chief executive Richard Molloy said his airline had reduced the number of flights between Tākaka and Wellington in May.

The airline was also the first recipient of a loan from the government’s $30 million package supporting struggling regional routes.

Sounds Air cut two routes and sold six aircraft last year with managing director Andrew Crawford warning that might not be the end of cuts.

Since the Covid-19 pandemic he said small airlines had been grappling with “spiralling, absolutely out of control costs”.

“Airways, airports, fuel, parts, finance, everything. Since Covid it’s just been an absolute nightmare trying to keep the costs under control in regional aviation,” Crawford said.

“The pressure on these airlines is extreme. Regional aviation in this country has been decimated and there’s more to come, I would say, if things keeps going like this.”

How much extra pressure is coming from fuel price rises?

Barrier Air chief executive Grant Bacon said the conflict in the Middle East had prompted sharp price shocks for regional airlines – sometimes with very little notice.

Barrier Air chief executive Grant Bacon says the conflict in the Middle East has prompted sharp price shocks for regional airlines. RNZ / Kate Newton

“After receiving a 95 cents per litre increase [last week] we have now also received a 12 cent increase… so it just goes on and on. Funny enough, I’ve just received another notification email from BP stating potentially more price rises. I’m too scared to open it,” he said.

“The issue is we sell tickets months in advance and we price in fuel and we consider perhaps that the fuel may increase, it may decrease and it’s a game of averages. But when you’re talking a 60 percent move in one bound it is certainly difficult to cope with.”

Molloy said fuel price rises so far equated to about $15 extra per passenger on an average Wellington to Tākaka Golden Bay Air flight.

Airlines simply could not rely on customers to pay that, he said.

“There’s a subtle equation there with fares and demand. Obviously if you increase your fares then eventually you will start to lose potential bookings,” he said.

Sounds Air managing director Andrew Crawford. Sounds Air

Sounds Air managing director Andrew Crawford said he expected fuel prices would eventually double.

“This is a big problem what’s going on here – big problem. And I don’t think we’ve quite got the brunt of it yet,” he said.

Why do regional links matter?

Bacon said regional airlines, like Barrier Air, not only carried passengers and leisure tours, they also carried “freight, medical supplies, doctors, passengers that are visiting Auckland in order to receive treatment such as ongoing chemotherapy”.

“These links are just vital to communities,” he said.

Ruatoki resident Lisa Rua said she had been flying from Whakatane to Auckland for treatment of a pelvic mesh injury.

She had taken the trip about six times in the past year and could not imagine what she would do without flights.

“Driving is definitely not an option and I haven’t got a family member who is able to do that for me either… It would definitely be very difficult for my recovery if I can’t catch a plane,” she said.

“It is our only in and out of the area unless we catch a bus, which if you’re not well is not really a good option.”

New Zealand Airports Association chief executive Billie Moore said there had been a trend towards larger aircraft in New Zealand, making it harder for regional routes to be commercially viable.

“That’s why you saw some time ago, for instance, Air New Zealand withdrawing their Beechcraft fleet. Some of those routes were then picked up by smaller regional airlines.

“That overall trend – most major airlines moving to larger aircraft – means that the role of these smaller operators around New Zealand becomes more and more critical. They’re the only ones flying the types of planes that are going to work for these kinds of routes,” she said.

“What you need is a system that allows those larger airlines to grow, to support whatever regional networks they can, but also allows smaller operators to continue operating efficient fleets that serve regional New Zealand.

“At the moment that is getting harder and harder.”

What government support is available for regional airlines?

The Regional Connectivity Fund provided $30 million in concessionary loans to allow some regional airlines to consolidate debt, refinance loans and invest in aircraft maintenance or upgrades.

Associate Minister of Transport James Meager said the fund, announced last August, was designed to “stabilise the regional sector” and give airlines more headroom.

Moore said it took a lot of work and commitment from senior ministers to get off the ground but it was not a perfect fix for the current pressures.

“While the loan funding will be extremely useful and valued by these airlines, as they look to try and restructure some of their operations, it’s not going to deal with the ongoing operational cost and making some of these routes more commercial,” she said.

“There may well be points where the economics of it all make it too hard for some of these routes to operate.”

Golden Bay Air said it was yet to receive lending it had secured.

“We’re still going through the quite considerable due diligence attached to that being approved. But look, it will be good timing for sure,” Molloy said.

Bacon said the Regional Connectivity Fund appeared to be “incredibly slow moving”.

“I wouldn’t want to rely on continuity of services based on that package at this time… And I wouldn’t want to get into debt to fund loss-making routes,” he said.

What more support do airlines want?

Bacon said the most effective support would be relief from government-imposed costs.

“Probably the most valuable thing that the government could do… is that we need to see some relief on levies such as airways charges and also CAA levies,” he said.

It might also be time for the government to consider ongoing subsidies to keep regional routes operating, Bacon said.

“Overseas that’s a very regular occurrence especially in North America, Canada, a lot of routes in Europe. We bought an airplane from France a couple of years ago from an operator and that airplane was 100 percent subsidised – and they were servicing an island probably not too dissimilar to one of our main routes, which is Great Barrier Island,” he said.

Moore said that also made sense to the New Zealand Airports Association.

“Intervention now shouldn’t be seen as a point of failure but we should recognise that we’ve had a lot of decades of success where we haven’t had to intervene with government funding.

“We’re at the point now where we should think carefully about how to make sure the system is resilient for the future,” she said.

“Most countries provide some kind of foundation of support for regional routes. And there’s a reason for that.”

However, Molloy said longer-term support should focus on reducing compliance and airport costs rather than directly subsidising routes.

“For us what the government has done is quite fitting over the longer term. From our perspective the route should be inherently viable and the government – by reducing sort of compliance costs, limiting landing fees – these kind of things are more appropriate measures rather than underwriting certain routes.”

What is the government planning?

Meager said the government was doing a lot of work to try to reduce cost pressures across the board.

Criticism the Regional Connectivity Fund was slow was probably fair, he said.

Associate Minister of Transport James Meager. RNZ / Nathan McKinnon

“With increasing pressure on prices with the conflict in Iran it’s timely that we’ve got that fund but it’s also timely that we look at what other things we can do to support regional connectivity,” he said.

While that was unlikely to include cuts to Civil Aviation Authority levies or airways charges, Meager said he had tasked the authority with a wider rules reform programme “to make sure that we aren’t putting any unnecessary regulation and costs on the aviation sector”.

“We’re looking at what the range of options are depending on how long this conflict goes.

“So in a similar way that ministers are looking at what are the triggers and scenarios for interventions on the fuel price, similarly for me in the aviation sector what are the triggers for intervention when routes are at risk particularly routes to vulnerable areas?

“We’ll be considering those options in the coming few days or weeks and making some decisions as things change.”

As the part-owner of some airports, the government was continuing to invest in capital upgrades and maintenance “to make sure that they are viable and continue to operate”, Meager said.

“I understand the arguments for more intervention. At the moment, where we are placed is that we prefer to make investments around infrastructure.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

‘Abysmal, unfair’ – NZ Brits say they count for less than EU migrants

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

Dual British or Irish New Zealanders have no exemption to the new UK border rule. RNZ /Gill Bonnett

Dual United Kingdom-New Zealand nationals say it is unfair some European Britons are allowed to dodge new passport rules, while British migrants in other parts of the world have to fall in line.

British citizens or their children who used to visit family and friends there using only a New Zealand passport and an ETA were “bodyslammed” by news last month they would need a UK passport, one migrant said.

Steve Horrell, of Upper Hutt, had already applied for and received his passport, but his son overseas had to scramble for documents so that the whole family – including young grandchildren classed as British – could join him on a trip to the UK next month.

He said Monday’s revelation that European Union nationals granted British citizenship post-Brexit under the Settled Scheme (EUSS) could get permanent exemptions from needing UK passports to travel there was unfair.

“I find it disappointing, actually, because it would be very easy to treat everybody the same. To my mind, if you’re going to apply something and say, you know, in my son’s case, they have to have British passports, why can’t they just apply that around the world? Because there might be a guy living next door to him who falls under this EUSS thing, whose kids might not have to do this, but his do.

“I do think it’s unfair because, Britain voted to be not part of the EU anymore and in many cases, I’ll be quite frank, I think that the government in the UK, whichever government, they sort of can choose between the laws they want to interpret, which suits them best.”

Former Te Papa museum curator and academic Mark Stocker says it’s ‘nuts’ that immigrants from Britain and dual citizens through descent can no longer travel on a New Zealand passport to enter the UK. Supplied

Mark Stocker, also born in the UK and a dual New Zealand citizen, said he was feeling disaffected about the UK policy and response, and sorry for travellers who were affected in more extreme ways, such as needing to visit sick relatives.

The change for EU settled status citizens reinforced the feeling that dual citizens elsewhere now had second class status, he said – behind those who only needed a $37 ETA or a third country’s identity document.

“If you’re being charitable, it’s a small step forward from a realisation of how god-awful the change policy was. But the expat Canadians, New Zealanders, Australians and more, it does nothing whatsoever for us.

“It’s perfectly consistent with the abysmal way in which the whole thing was introduced in the first place, where lies were told by the British government about us being told in good time.

“If the government had fairly signalled the new policies, then one might grin and bear them”.

But the way it has been introduced was “pretty dreadful, pretty abysmal really.”

He could not use an expired UK passport – one of the suggestions the UK put forward as a temporary measure if people also had their valid New Zealand passport – because he threw it away when it expired.

Countries such as Australia and Japan were looking like more attractive alternatives to Britain for a holiday, especially with the war in the Middle East, he said.

The Home Office said the change was made to ensure rights under the EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement were upheld.

The British High Commission in Wellington has been approached for comment, including whether it has had to help citizens who have been trying to travel to the UK but did not have the right passport.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

School attendance services warn rising fuel prices likely to drive up truancy

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

Attendance services warn rising fuel prices are likely to drive up truancy. 123rf

Attendance services warn rising fuel prices are likely to drive up truancy.

Two service providers, one in rural Northland the other in Auckland, say transport costs are a big driver of student absences and they expect it to get worse.

Meanwhile, one of the providers, Mangere East Family Service Centre, said long-term truants had often lost the physical fitness they needed to cope with a school day and had to be eased back into classes.

The centre was the new attendance service provider for 22 schools in the area after the government regnegoiated 83 contracts last year.

Chief executive Caroline Tana-Tepania said bidding for the contract was a logical progression because its social workers in schools were already working a lot with truants.

Even so she was surprised by the scale of the problem in the area – so far the centre had been charged with tracking down 400 children who were not enrolled in any school, about 230 of them historical cases from last year.

“I knew that it was an issue, but I certainly wasn’t aware of the extent of the numbers,” she said, adding that schools would be starting to alert the service to their chronic truants.

Anika Channa managed the centre’s nine-person attendance team and had previously worked in attendance for three-and-a-half-years.

She said one of the biggest changes she had noticed in the government’s attendance service overhaul was greater involvement of other social services.

“In my experience, there are a lot of factors as to why children are not going to school. It’s actually not just that they don’t want to go. There’s barriers like transport, housing, health. So having those community organisations involved helps us navigate the families into the correct supports for them,” she said.

In addition, the service’s ‘attendance navigators’ now stayed in contact with children after they returned to school to ensure they maintained their attendance and dealt with any new barriers to attendance that might crop up.

“It just means that we’re able to intervene more quickly rather than having to wait for another referral to come through,” she said.

Channa said a major group of chronic truants was the children of families who had moved out of the area, but kept their children enrolled in a Māngere school.

She said many such families struggled to get their children to school every day and the rising price of petrol would make that problem worse.

Channa said finding non-enrolled children took a “bit of investigation”.

Often the family was not at their last recorded address and attendance officers had to ask schools for children’s emergency contacts, often members of their extended family, in order to track them down.

Channa said once children had been found, they had to be eased back into school.

“Going straight back into school for five days is just so much for them, it’s very overwhelming. It’s not just going to school, it’s socialising, it’s being out in the environment,” she said.

She said that was because many truants spent their time “bed surfing”.

“They just stay in bed and so when they go out to do anything, they get really, really tired so it takes them some time to adjust.”

Channa said consistency and “awhi” or support were the keys to a successful return to school.

Transport a massive problem

Ara Whakamaua director Lisa Halvorson. Supplied

Ara Whakamaua has been the attendance service for 26 schools across Hokianga and Kaipara for more than three years.

Director Lisa Halvorson said it usually worked with more than 500 students each year, successfully closing 70-80 percent of the cases by returning children to class or finding other education options for them.

She said this year was already “way better”, thanks largely to a new computer system that showed when and where children last attended school.

“Already we’re seeing that the closure rates are reducing and that the active cases are turning around a lot faster. So that’s really pleasing to see,” she said.

“In the past, we have just been chasing kids to look for them. Whereas now we actually have that last point of contact and we’ve got the ability then to see … a little bit of a pattern or to see how often they were attending and what that looked like. So it does make it so much easier,” she said.

Halvorson said there were a lot of reasons families might not send their children to school.

“Some of it can be as simple as the child doesn’t have the right PE uniform or no shoes, they don’t have a school bag or a lunch box or a drink bottle, and so the whakamā about that child walking into a school without that is hard,” she said.

“Transport is a massive one for us in our region, so the ability for our whanau to have warranted and registered cars or to be able to afford to run their children to school – we’re talking some distances of children having to travel 30 kilometres to get to the closest school one way.”

She said some cases had relatively simple solutions while others involved multiple agencies.

“They just don’t have a pair of shoes on their feet then sure, we’ll go to the Warehouse and buy them a pair of shoes and put them into school,” she said.

“If it’s a bit bigger than that, then yes, there are other avenues that we can support whanau to complete application forms or do hardship grants … We also connect with a lot of other social services in our regions.”

She said the job was rewarding when families received the help they needed and created stability for their children.

“To get the kids back to school and have a sense of well-being and self-worth and some mates around them and a bit of social connection, that goes a long way,” she said.

“Once we see the right supports in place, and then you see the attendance stabilise, and then you see the whanau feel a bit more confident, and then everyone’s navigating the system really well. That’s a massive win,” she said.

“Some of those children would never have had that stabilisation in their lives, because sometimes you’re dealing with little six and seven-year-old children, they’re too young, they don’t know any better.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Tattoo-ink induced blindness: Rare but rising

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

Despite one in five New Zealanders being tattooed, the vast majority are likely to have never heard of tattoo-associated uveitis.

It’s a condition associated with inflammation in the inner eye that, in some cases, can lead to permanent vision loss. The culprit may be an immune response to certain toxins in the ink used in tattooing.

To give you an idea about how rare it is, a recent study in Australia looked at 40 cases of tattoo-associated uveitis reported between 2023 and 2025 (Aussies are more tattooed than New Zealanders at a rate of one in four, so close to seven million people). However, reported cases globally have doubled since 2010. The cases in the study were often associated with black ink, the most common colour used in tattooing.

Road rules shakeup on the table – here’s what you need to know

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

Currently e-scooters are allowed to ride on the footpath and the road, but it’s illegal to ride in the cycle lanes, but this would change under new rules. RNZ / Samuel Rillstone

Both the previous government and the current one kicked the can down the road on making ‘sensible’ changes to road rules, but now the changes are back on the agenda

Every day, across the country, kids break the law by riding their bikes on the footpath.

Every now and again they might get a growling from a grumpy passerby, but for the most part, Kiwis recognise that it’s a safer alternative to a child riding where they’re technically supposed to – in a cycle path, or on the road.

“I think most parents who have got kids riding their bikes will probably be doing it on the footpath,” director of greater Auckland Matt Lowrie said.

But now, the government has proposed changes to road rules that would mean children 12 and under are free to ride where it’s safest – on the footpath.

In a press release, Transport Minister Chris Bishop said the changes were aimed at “fixing the basics” for big and small forms of transport.

They come in two packages with the first including:

  • Allowing e-scooters in cycle lanes
  • Kids 12 and under being allowed to bike on the footpaths
  • Mandatory passing gaps around cyclists and horses
  • Drivers in 60 kilometres or under speed zones to allow buses to merge into traffic
  • Better signage for berm parking

The second package relates to heavy vehicles.

This article is focused on the first package and what it means for drivers, riders and pedestrians.

These changes aren’t a new concept.

National announced similar rules in 2025 and the previous Labour government proposed changes to footpath rules in 2020.

Matt Lowrie, who is an avid cyclist, said these changes had been a long time coming.

“A lot of these are quite common sense changes and so the government are now getting back to it again and looking to get them approved.”

New Zealand director of road safety charity BRAKE, Caroline Perry, said the organisation welcomed the changes, but would like clearer guidance on some aspects.

“There are some small parts to it that we would like some clarification on in terms of things like children up to the age of 12 being able to cycle on footpaths. What about their parents or guardians?”

Currently e-scooters are allowed to ride on the footpath and the road, but it’s illegal to ride in the cycle lanes, but this would change under new rules.

“In legislation, only bikes can be on cycle lanes, whereas actually in terms of the speed that e-scooters are generally going, they actually match more appropriately the speeds that are on the cycle lanes, so that makes sense that e-scooters could use those lanes rather than footpaths,” Perry said.

The proposed change to this rule could help improve safety for e-scooter riders – especially important with e-scooter-related ACC claims on the rise.

Between 2022 and 2025, new ACC claims involving e-scooters increased by 55 percent across all age groups.

Young people under the age 25 made up close to half of ACC claims between the beginning of 2026 and early February.

Perry said more could be done to minimise riding risks.

“We need more investment in infrastructure, particularly for active modes.

“Part of making it safer to walk and cycle is to have more of those dedicated facilities for them such as bike lanes.”

Despite all the negative commentary that can come with e-scooters, Lowrie says the positives do outweigh the negatives.

“What e-scooters do is open up the first mile, last mile connection.

“E-scooters can really help with addressing those issues and making public transport – walking, cycling – more attractive and [allowing people to] get around our city easier, and often faster.”

These proposed road rules are currently open for consultation and close on the 25th of March.

Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here.

You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Banks are paying customers to stay

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

It is common for retention payments to be about 0.4 percent of the loan amount. File photo. RNZ

Home loan borrowers are taking cashback incentives to stay with their current banks, as competition continues in the mortgage market.

The focus on cashback incentives intensified through the end of 2025, when ANZ ran a campaign offering cash payments equal to 1.5 percent of loan amounts to new home loan borrowers.

That prompted other lenders to match it, and in some cases offer borrowers incentives to stay, too.

Helen Stuart, a mortgage adviser at Compass Mortgages, said she had seen “retention payments” offered by several banks lately, especially when someone had all their lending come off a fixed term.

She had one client turned down who still had a year to run on half his lending.

It is harder to change to a different lender when some of the loan is still fixed, because it usually means a break fee has to be paid.

Stuart said it was common for retention payments to be about 0.4 percent of the loan amount. “But it varies.”

Campbell Hastie, of Hastie Mortgages, said it was still happening, although the activity had slowed since December.

“The number of retention payments we organised was probably higher than the number of refinance deals we concluded.

“That’s because by the time you paid the legal fees for moving, in many cases the retention cash payment looked about the same as the refinance cash less legal fees, not to mention the effort required to actually make the change.”

Jeremy Andrews, of Key Mortgages, said what people could get would depend on how long a customer had had their loan, whether they had taken a cashback previously and whether they had more than 20 percent equity.

“Some banks will refuse retention cash if the clients are already fixed in and they see it as of no benefit to the client to refinance to another bank. Some examples include if it’d be detrimental either in break fees – they’re already on higher than market rates, or if they would need to move to higher rates in the market, or the legal costs associated exceed any cashback benefit of moving.

“When retention cash is offered it’s typically a lot less than the same bank will offer for new business – often between 0.25 percent to 0.4 percent of the lending amount, compared to currently up to 0.9 percent or even 1 percent cashback for new or refinanced lending.”

Banks said it was a response to competition in the market.

ANZ said it was “fighting to hold on to and win new customers in a very competitive market”.

“Customers consider a number of things when choosing who to get a home loan from – pricing, product, approval times and other incentives on offer. At times we will offer deals like cash contributions for customers.

“For existing customers, we encourage people to connect with us to ensure they are aware of all the options available to them. We’ll always endeavour to give our customers the most competitive offer – our bankers can sometimes offer cash contributions to existing customers.”

Westpac agreed competition was fierce.

“We’re working hard to both retain existing customers and win new ones. We consider a range of options to make sure we are providing great value for all our customers.”

Sign up for Money with Susan Edmunds, a weekly newsletter covering all the things that affect how we make, spend and invest money.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Government set to unveil details of fuel support package

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

Cabinet has signed off on what support the government will offer in the face of rising fuel costs. RNZ / Dan Cook

The Citizens Advice Bureau says people are going to need significant support as fuel prices continue to rise, and is hopeful whatever relief the government is set to offer will include support for those not in paid work.

Cabinet has signed off on what support the government will offer, with details to be released later on Tuesday.

The Finance Minister has hinted it would be targeted towards low and middle income families.

“It must be targeted, it must be timely, and it must be temporary and not drive inflation or debt higher, because as we steer New Zealand through this immediate challenge, we must also continue to look to the future and bend the debt curve down,” Nicola Willis said on Monday.

The fact the Inland Revenue Department and Treasury had been tasked with going over the options, and a previous admission from the government it would use existing mechanisms, indicated it could be looking at changes to Working for Families.

The In-Work Tax Credit (IWTC) was paid out depending on someone’s income, the weeks they worked, and how many children they had.

In April, the government would raise the abatement threshold (the income level at which the credit would reduce) from $42,700 to $44,900.

There was also the Independent Earner Tax Credit (IETC) for people earning between $24,000 and $70,000.

The IETC was designed to help people on lower to middle incomes that were not eligible for Working for Families.

People earning between $24,000 and $66,000 received a tax credit of $10 per week. It decreased by 13 cents for every dollar someone earned over $66,000.

Asked on Monday whether the abatement thresholds would be temporarily changed, Willis said she would wait to comment until the details of the package were announced.

Finance Minister Nicola Willis. RNZ / Samuel Rillstone

The Citizens Advice Bureau’s national policy advisor Louise May said there were already “high levels of stress” amongst the client base, and the latest hike in the cost of living could plunge people further into hardship.

“We’ve got a lot of clients coming in for help who are just unable to make ends meet. That includes clients with work and those without, and we are really concerned that those clients are going to be in even more dire financial and material hardship situations,” she said.

May hoped both people in work and people receiving income support who did not have paid work were offered relief, and also called for relief for support services such as food banks and emergency accommodation.

“Any measure to increase money coming into the pockets of people who are struggling should definitely be looked at. One thing we’re really concerned about is the fact that there hasn’t been mention of families who don’t have paid work,” she said.

“We think it’s really important that any relief package that’s introduced as a result of this latest crisis also includes families and people who don’t currently have paid employment. They are the ones who are going to be most affected.”

May said it was not just about what people were paying at the pump, but rent and food prices were also high, and people were struggling.

The Citizens Advice Bureau says people are going to need significant support as fuel prices continue to rise. RNZ / Mark Papalii

Infometrics chief executive and principal economist Brad Olsen said changes to the IWTC or IETC would be quick and effective.

He said the difficulty of using the tax system was it would not be as easy for households to see the money come into their back pockets compared to a helicopter payment such as the 2022 Cost of Living Payment, but it would mean the government could run it out quickly and then run it back quickly.

“It does seem like probably the best way to move things through is to use the tax system. Whether or not it’s enough, any little bit will help at the moment, given the sorts of pressures that some households are under. I guess the most workable thing using the tax system around the Independent Earner Tax Credit and the In Work Tax Credit is that they can be targeted to those on lower incomes already, and so you are getting the support there through to people who probably need it most.”

Olsen said the government would be trying to balance providing support and limiting the costs.

“There’s no extra money in the system, and to fund whatever package the government is coming out with either requires an increase in debt or something else in the government system to be cut back on,” he said.

“They want to provide as much support as possible, but keep the limitations tight so they’re not sort of spending a huge amount. And for some people, that does mean that they will feel that they’re not getting the support they might expect from government. But equally, the wider you go, the more money it costs, and therefore at some point, the more the country has to repay.”

Olsen said one of the risks of using tax system changes was they were sometimes “so fiendishly complex” that households may not know what they were entitled to, and sometimes neither did the government.

“They get too much or too little, and then you only find out after the fact that they actually either deserve more, or sometimes in the worst case, they have to start paying this money back, which would almost be the complete opposite of what the government wants to try and support at the moment.

“So you want to, from a government point of view, try and balance these changes, to make them as absolutely blunt and simple as possible, to get that money out the door, to support those who need it, but also have it go through enough of a workable system, which is a more complex tax system that we have to try and provide that sort of targeted focus.”

Infometrics chief executive and principal economist Brad Olsen. RNZ / Samuel Rillstone

Labour leader Chris Hipkins was reserving judgement on what the government would offer until he had seen the details, but said the “principle” was that it should be offered to all people on low and fixed incomes.

“Anyone on a fixed income or a low income is going to be suffering at the moment because of the high price of fuel. That includes superannuitants, it includes people living on benefits, it includes people caring for others and not currently earning an income, not just those who are on low incomes in the workforce.”

Hipkins would not, however, offer up what Labour would do differently if it was in power, saying it was up to the government to present a plan.

“At the moment, the onus has to be on the current government to lead the country through that,” Hipkins said.

Labour leader Chris Hipkins. RNZ / Mark Papalii

The Green Party has proposed an urgent support package including free public transport, relief payments for low income and rural people to help meet additional transport costs, temporarily expanding eligibility for school buses and reversing cuts to school bus routes, reversing planned cuts to the Total Mobility Scheme, increasing mileage rates to care and support workers who receive well below standard IRD mileage, and a windfall profits tax.

Asked why the Greens could propose policies but Labour could not, Hipkins said minor parties could “promise a lot of things” during election campaigns.

“They get a lot more luxury to promise whatever they want, compared to the bigger parties,” Hipkins said.

In a post on social media on Monday night, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said he had spoken with Singapore Prime Minister Lawrence Wong about what more they could do to deal with difficulties in fuel and other supply chains.

Luxon said about a third of New Zealand’s fuel was refined in Singapore and the two leaders agreed it was important to keep the trade of essential goods flowing between the two countries.

“We’re working hard to ensure New Zealand’s fuel needs are met amidst the conflict in the Middle East, which is causing disruption to supply and higher prices at the pump,” he said.

“When I visit Singapore in May, we will sign the Agreement on Trade in Essential Supplies, a deal that will help keep supply chains flowing for fuel, food and other products.

“Building on the great platform we’ve built with one another, we also talked about what further work our Governments can do together as we navigate through these supply chain challenges.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Coroner blames Maritime NZ, Police for delay of findings on Vivienne Pincott’s river rafting death

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

A white water raft goes over Tutea Falls on the Kaituna River. Supplied

Maritime New Zealand has apologised for an error that contributed to delays in releasing a coroner’s report into the river rafting death of a woman near Rotorua in August, 2020.

In his report into the death of 61-year-old Wellington woman Vivienne Pincott released on Tuesday, Coroner Michael Robb blamed Maritime New Zealand and Police for taking too long to provide some files, reports and evidence that led to the delay in releasing his findings.

Pincott died from severe injuries while white water rafting a class-five rapid that contained a seven metre drop.

She was being guided down the Tutea Falls on the Kaituna River.

In his report, Coroner Robb said even though the drop had been undertaken without fatal consequences by many others prior to Pincott’s death, the circumstances highlighted the risks of rafting on such fast moving white water.

“Safety considerations including the wearing of an appropriately sized and fitted lifejacket and helmet must be maintained, but as the circumstances of Vivienne’s death highlight, this may not provide complete protection against a fatal outcome in what is an inherently dangerous activity,” he said.

‘We unreservedly apologise’

In his report, Coroner Robb acknowledged the delay between Pincott’s death and the release of his findings.

“That delay was in large part the result of the report directed by the Coroners Court to be provided from Maritime New Zealand not being provided until 6 May 2024, nearly four years after Vivienne’s death,” he said.

“That delay was then contributed to by the New Zealand Police not providing their investigation file to the Coroners Court until April 2025, four years and eight months after Vivienne’s death.”

Coroner Robb said Maritime New Zealand had acknowledged and apologised for the delay in providing their report explaining that the delay occurred due to “internal circumstances relating to the file and the historical ways in which such matters were managed” at the time.

In a statement, Maritime New Zealand confirmed that the Coroner’s Office request for information into Pincott’s death was missed due to an administrative error.

“We extend our condolences to the family of Ms Pincott for her loss and acknowledge that the delay in finalising the Coroner’s report will have added to their distress. We unreservedly apologise to the Coroner and Ms Pincott’s family for the extended period it took for us to provide the material,” it said.

“Since 2021 we have put in place a new team, systems and processes to manage notifications and requests from the Coroner’s Office and other enquiries, which includes more stringent tracking of reports and cases.

“We are sure a delay of this nature will not happen again.”

In his report, Coroner Robb said that the greatest delay in releasing his findings was due to delays caused by the gap in Maritime New Zealand providing its report to Rotorua Police.

”However, a further year of delay was caused by the Rotorua Police not forwarding that report to the Coroners Court until April, 2025,” he said.

The coroner said that the police took years to sign off written statements from officers who had been working the day Pincott was injured. Some of the officers had left in that time.

In a statement, Rotorua Area Commander Inspector Herby Ngawhika said the police carried out an investigation, as directed by the coroner.

“We accept there was an unnecessary delay in the coronial process caused, in part, by Police,” he said.

“As noted in the report, shortly after Ms Pincott’s death, New Zealand was placed in a COVID19 level 4 lockdown. This unprecedented event consumed much of our available resource and led to a backlog of coronial files,” Ngawhika said.

“We acknowledge the impact of this delay on Ms Pincott’s family and friends and offer our sincere condolences.”

In his report, Coroner Robb said he did not take over the file until December 2025 after the inquiry had been tranferred from the orginal coroner.

“The coroner to whom the inquiry had been reassigned discovering a conflict of interest upon review of the disclosure when it was received in April, 2025. This resulted in the inquiry needing to be transferred to me, as the third assigned coroner,” he said.

“That transfer occurred in December, 2025.”

Coroner Robb said his review of the evidence in December 2025 revealed that there were gaps in the evidence that had been gathered by the police resulting in further reports being sought

from both the rafting company and Maritime New Zealand.

“A fortnight later I received a thorough and comprehensive report from the rafting company (Rotorua Adventures New Zealand – under which River Rats was operating at the time), which addressed all issues that I had raised with both the company and Maritime New Zealand,” he said.

“On 29 January 2026 I received the additional report requested from Maritime New Zealand.”

‘Extremely rare injury’

At the time of her death, Pincott was holidaying with her 25-year-old son, Bryden Frizell.

Although the coroner’s report noted previous heart problems she was described as a “fit and healthy” woman who had taken part in other physical activities without issue.

The River Rats raft she and Bryden were on had successfully navigated several other drops, before guides took it over the final seven metre – class five – waterfall.

Coroner Robb said that the raft initially became momentarily submerged and full of water at the bottom of the waterfall before resurfacing.

Video evidence showed that when the raft resurfaced, there were only three occupants on board.

“The two guides were in their original positions and Bryden remained in the front of the raft, but having been washed or jolted from his original right hand seat position towards his left occupying, or partially occupying where his mother had been seated,” he said.

Pincott resurfaced some 10-15 seconds later, before being rescued by guides.

Although initially concious and able to talk, she deteriorated and collapsed before emergency services arrived.

The coroner’s report said that, despite resuscitation efforts, she was pronounced dead at the scene.

A post-mortem found that Pincott suffered severe traumatic injuries.

“What I wanted to understand was whether this extremely rare injury sustained by Vivienne was a consequence of something environmentally unusual, such as overly high or low river flow, technique or navigation issue that occurred at the time, or any other identifiable difference to the multiple other uneventful navigations of the Tutea Falls,” Coroner Robb said.

The coroner concluded it was most likely that Pincott was driven into rocks or the riverbed after being ejected from the raft.

While such incidents were extremely rare given the large number of people who had rafted Tutea Falls, the coroner found that her death was the result of the inherent risks of white-water rafting, even when safety procedures were followed.

The rafting company, River Rats, had changed ownership since Pincott’s death.

The new owners, and Pincott’s family were approached for comment.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

African cities are diverse and thriving, but face many challenges. How to make them healthier

By -

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Elaine Nsoesie, Assistant Professor, Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston University

A new book called Urban Health in Africa explores how rapid urbanisation across the continent shapes public health and wellbeing. Drawing on diverse research and case studies, the book reframes African cities not just as sites of challenge, but as places of innovation, resilience and opportunity.

We spoke to global health researcher Elaine Nsoesie and urbanisation and wellbeing sociologist Blessing Mberu, co-editors of the book, to explore why the stories of African cities matter, and what it will take to build inclusive, healthy urban futures.

What’s one thing about urban life in Africa that you think more people should appreciate?

African cities work, but not always like cities in other regions. In the book, we quote the following text by AbdouMaliq Simone, who works on issues of spatial composition in urban regions:

In city after city, one can witness an incessant throbbing produced by the intense proximity of hundreds of activities: cooking, reciting, selling, loading and unloading, fighting, praying, relaxing, pounding, and buying, all side by side on stages too cramped, too deteriorated, too clogged with waste, history, and disparate energy, and sweat to sustain all of them. And yet they persist.

That persistence matters. Too often, discussions about African cities focus only on their problems. These include inadequate infrastructure, rapid urbanisation and informal settlements. What gets lost is their remarkable functionality and their diversity. No single city can represent the entire continent. Lagos is not Nairobi; Accra is not Dakar. Each has its own history, governance structures and contemporary challenges. Treating them all the same flattens this complexity.

Yes, these cities face serious challenges. But they’re also home to innovative urban experts, effective policy solutions and technological breakthroughs designed for their specific contexts. The question isn’t whether African cities work. It is whether we’re paying attention to how they work, documenting how they are addressing challenges related to health and learning from their solutions.

Was there a story or example that really stayed with you?

When we set out to write this book, we knew we had to start with history. You can’t understand health in African cities today without understanding how colonialism shaped the built environment and urban citizenship. We wanted readers to see how historical forces combined with rural-urban migration, population growth and policies created the urban landscapes affecting millions of lives today.

Read more: Harare’s street traders create their own system to survive in the city

Our second goal was to map the social determinants of health – the conditions of the environments in which people are born, live, play, work and learn – shaping African cities. We focused on informal settlements and slums because they’ve become defining features of urban Africa. We examined how residents navigate daily struggles: inadequate housing, water and sanitation; air pollution; transportation; food insecurity. We didn’t want to present these as isolated problems. We wanted to show how they’re interconnected challenges that affect many communities.

One of our favourite chapters is in this section. The chapter explores how transport affects health in African cities – both the risks and the benefits. For example, the availability of transportation increases access to hospitals and schools, while vehicles also cause traffic injuries and air pollution. The authors also discuss distinctive forms of public transport that African cities share that you won’t find in most other parts of the world.

Motorcycle taxis, for example, have different names. They are called boda bodas in Kampala, okadas in Lagos. Commuter minibuses are referred to as poda-poda in Freetown, trotro in Accra, daladala in Dar es Salaam, matatu in Kenya, car rapides in Dakar, kamuny in Kampala, gbaka in Abidjan, esprit de mort in Kinshasa, candongueiros in Luanda, sotrama in Bamako, songa kidogo in Kigali.

Freetown, Sierra Leone. Getty Images

The chapter captures a major theme in the book; while these cities are different, policies that have been effective in one city can be adopted to address the needs of residents in another city.

Read more: South Africa’s minibus taxi industry runs on social bonds – reform must accept this

In addition to the social determinants of health, we had another section that addressed Africa’s unique demographic reality: these cities are young. We dedicated sections to how urban environments shape young lives, particularly around sexual and reproductive health. We also highlighted the growing epidemic of chronic diseases like obesity, diabetes and hypertension. Studies have shown an association between the rate of urbanisation in Africa and an increase in chronic diseases because of issues such as adoption of unhealthy western diets, lack of spaces to exercise, and sedentary behaviours.

To showcase how some cities are addressing the challenges related to the social determinants of health, we included case studies on air quality in Kampala, new mental health initiatives in Yaoundé, an approach to reducing school dropouts in Arusha, integrated planning transforming informal settlements in Nairobi, and digital health innovations. The case studies demonstrate that effective solutions incorporate community voices and the local context.

Your book outlines a future for urban health in Africa. What do you see?

Our final chapters make explicit what we believe must happen next. We need public health professionals, urban planners, physicians, nurses, community health workers, policy advocates and water and waste managers working together. We need educational programmes focused specifically on urban health. Most critically, we need strong local, national and regional governance to turn plans into reality.

Read more: Youth workers are spreading health messages on social media: how to support what they do in South Africa

But we also need to elevate youth voices, ideas and innovations across the continent. According to United Nations estimates, about 40% of Africans were under 15 in 2020, and nearly 60% were under 25 – the largest proportion of young people of any region worldwide.

Young people are shaping African cities and they will live with the consequences of whatever decisions are made today.

What motivated the publication of this book, and why now?

When we started this project there weren’t any books on urban health in Africa written by Africans working to address the various challenges faced by urban residents. An estimated 46% of Africa’s 1.3 billion people live in urban areas. Africa is also the continent with the fastest urbanisation rate, with 50% to 65% of the population projected to live in urban areas by 2050. Despite having urban challenges similar to those in other regions, some of the issues that cities in Africa face are unique.

We wanted to bring together researchers and practitioners with diverse expertise and deep knowledge of the challenges people face in cities. We wanted to look at these challenges, the policies that have been effective and recommendations about what must be done to improve the health of residents.

– ref. African cities are diverse and thriving, but face many challenges. How to make them healthier – https://theconversation.com/african-cities-are-diverse-and-thriving-but-face-many-challenges-how-to-make-them-healthier-274647

‘From the river to the sea’ – swimming against the Queensland tide

By -

A CAUTIONARY TALE: By Jim Dowling

Both my son Franz and I have been arrested, separately, for suspected thought crimes relating to Palestine and Israel.

We dared to display in public the words, “from the river to the sea”, using or displaying such words now being illegal in Queensland.

I say “thought crimes” because neither of our displays mentioned Palestine or Israel. So obviously they can only conclude we must have been illegally thinking the “wrong thoughts” about this conflict.

For nearly two years a group of us have been gathering weekly outside the office of Boeing in Brisbane, to draw attention to their terrorist activity in making missiles, fighter jets, attack helicopters and other weapons of mass destruction, used in present conflicts, especially the Gaza genocide.

When the Queensland government made it illegal to use the words “From the River to the Sea” in public, I went to the usual Wednesday action with a large placard saying “From the River to the Sea, Brisbane will be Free — of Boeing”.

Eventually police came and arrested me. My arresting officer asked me what the words on the banner meant. I gave him a good rave about Boeing and why we wanted them nowhere in Brisbane, from the river to the sea.

He took a while trying to get me to “incriminate” myself by making reference to Palestine etc. Eventually, after exposing the farcical nature of the law, I was happy do so.

Interrogated by ‘anti-terrorism squad’
He took me to the watchhouse where I was interrogated about my thought crimes by the “Anti-terrorism squad” (that is not a joke by the way).

This gave me a good chance to explain why we wanted Boeing out of Brisbane, and a lot more — about free speech, terrorism, nonviolence, etc. After an hour and a half they let me go.

I go to court on the April 14.

Now, 42 hours later at 7am, the same ever vigilant anti-terrorism squad raided Dorothy Day house of hospitality, with a team of eight officers.

Franz immediately confessed to his thought crimes, and actual crimes of displaying a banner on the side of the house reading, “From the river to the sea — come and get us [Premier] Crisafulli”.

Now I guess it is an exaggeration to call this elite squad “ever vigilant”, as the banner had been on the wall of the house for over a week. And, being on a main road and very visible from said road, there is no telling how many innocent citizens may have been infected by the thought crimes emanating from it.

Once at Dorothy Day house, the police searched all the rooms for? Hmm, illegal thinking maybe.

Phone and laptop confiscated
Anyhow, as I said, Franz broke down and confessed, so they eventually left everyone else alone. They confiscated Franz’s phone and laptop — probably the main reason for the raid.

They also took the banner and the very paints used to commit the crime. I asked Franz if they took the paper placed under the banner during the painting process. But they did not.

Now, they could find out a lot of information from Franz’s phone and laptop. They could find out who were being infected by these thought crimes, and how far they were spreading.

Perhaps they could investigate the words of the songs on Franz’s laptop sung by his church choir, to see if there was anything about rivers or seas. Perhaps, with names and phone numbers of his fellow choir members they could instigate more raids. (I know for a fact some choir members weren’t even born in Australia!)

In the end the police told Franz they would let him know next Tuesday, if or what he would be charged with.

You can read the ABC news report of the raid of Dorothy Day house here. You can also see him interviewed on Brisbane’s Channel Ten news on March 20 (if you can find it — ABC Tiktok video removed).

So there you have it. Another week in the state’s never ending battle against terrorism. Or is it a battle against a few pathetic people who believe they are the ones resisting terrorism?

Is it terrorism to say “from the river to the sea”, or is it terrorism to slaughter tens of thousands of innocents with the help of Boeing, Pine Gap and the Australian government? You decide.

Jim Dowling is a human rights, free speech and anti-war activist from Brisbane, Australia.

Article by AsiaPacificReport.nz

Large vehicle fire in West Auckland suburb extinguished

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

File photo. RNZ / Nate McKinnon

Firefighters have extinguished a large vehicle fire in the West Auckland suburb of Massey this evening.

Fire and Emergency crews arrived on Sunline Avenue to find a car and a van well alight about 7.30pm

The fire was extinguished by 8pm and St John said nobody was injured.

A fire investigator is at the scene to determine the cause of the fire.

Police said they were also at the scene.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Politics with Michelle Grattan: Rory Medcalf on Australians’ growing national security fears

By -

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

Australians have become increasingly anxious about national security – even before the outbreak of the recent US-Israel war with Iran, according to a new report.

The Australian National University’s National Security College surveyed more than 20,000 Australians in November 2024, July 2025 and February 2026. The surveys took in last December’s Bondi terror attack, but predated the current Middle East war.

Non-military threats, such as AI-enabled attacks and disruption to critical supplies, were seen as the most likely threats in the next five years. Fewer than one in five participants felt Australia was “very” or “fully” prepared for any of the 15 security risks in the survey.

Yet a foreign military attack on Australian soil was seen as the most “catastrophic” looming threat. Almost half (45%) of people saw it as a risk within the next five years.

One of the report’s key authors and head of the ANU’s National Security College, Professor Rory Medcalf, joined us on the podcast.

The report found national security worries had “racheted up with each survey”, from 42% of respondents in November 2024 to 64% by February 2026. Medcalf said that finding was “disturbing”.

On some specific issues and particularly terrorism – and of course the atrocity of the Bondi terrorist attack is what punctuated that narrative – we saw very high rises in concern, including among younger Australians, who went from something like a 22% concern about terrorism as a serious security risk, through to 55% from July last year until February this year.

‘Inevitable’ climate risks

While other threats have been getting more attention, Medcalf said Australians remain live to the dangers of climate change and natural disasters.

[Climate change and natural disasters] registered consistently as high concerns as in [at] that the higher end – not the very top, but the higher end of concerns across the community […] There was a very clear difference between younger and older Australians on that issue. Younger Australians were more concerned.

On the other hand, when you looked at the question of the likelihood of shocks, the climate issue actually probably rated highest in terms of inevitability.

The Trump factor

While the Middle East war broke out only after the final survey, Medcalf said the “Trump factor” was apparent even before then.

It’s clear that the Trump factor has had a real impact here. So we took our first of three surveys in November 2024, second [in] July 2025, the third in February 26. And we’ve seen a ratchet of anxiety across that time.

We’ve also seen issues like, for example, the failure of the international rules-based order becoming of great concern.

[…] I hesitate to draw a verified line of causation between [US President] Donald Trump and Australian security anxieties. But there’s so much, I guess, there’s so much by way of evidence that suggests that’s the way people feel.

The researchers also conducted focus groups and individual interviews. Madcalf said those interviews gave a clear sense the US-Australia alliance “is not what it used to be”.

Rays of hope

Despite Australians’ increasing anxieties about national security, Medcalf said there remained some “green shoots”.

The last point that I took some hope from going forward was the response to a question we posed specifically in the aftermath of the Bondi terrorist attack, which was to say that in the aftermath of that anti-semitic atrocity: ‘Do all Australians have a responsibility to help keep our communities peaceful and safe?’ We got a 71% yes to that question; 32% of respondents agreed strongly with that proposition. Only 8% disagreed.

So I think there are some foundations there to work harder towards a coherent national security response that respects the differences in Australian society, but […] brings the community into the conversation and perhaps adapts our priorities as we go on that journey.

– ref. Politics with Michelle Grattan: Rory Medcalf on Australians’ growing national security fears – https://theconversation.com/politics-with-michelle-grattan-rory-medcalf-on-australians-growing-national-security-fears-278984

View from The Hill: Albanese could learn from Malinauskas’ masterclass in messaging

By -

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

With social cohesion badly fraying and One Nation’s surge reinforcing the threat it is under, politicians desperately need to find the rhetoric to help glue our multiculturalism back together.

Obviously it will take much more than words but, as is often said, words matter.

So does linking change with continuity, relating today’s Australia to the country of yesterday.

Also important is making the national symbols and values the instruments of unity, claiming them back from the culture warriors.

In his Saturday night victory speech, South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas gave a masterclass in how to tackle the task. On Sunday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s comments on the subject were direct and blunt.

In a targeted response to One Nation, Malinauskas personalised diversity with a contemporary anecdote. He rooted the imperative for tolerance in the distant past by invoking an Australian literary icon. He brought a degree of subtlety that spoke to his ability as a communicator.

“I lined up today as I’ve done at each election, at the Woodville Gardens polling booth in my electorate. It’s home to one of the more diverse communities in our state,” the premier told the excited crowd at the Labor function.

“And I got chatting to the gentleman in front of me, who I had met before, and he was Vietnamese, a man small in stature, but tough as nails. He was a boat person.

“He came out here from Vietnam, fleeing communism, looking for the same thing that my grandparents did, an opportunity. An opportunity to live in a peaceful country where he knew he could work hard, provide for his family, put a roof over his head, and then in turn, give back.

“And as he was queuing up to vote today, he said to me, rather quietly, ‘I like elections’.

“It sort of struck me as being a clear signal of what patriotism can look like.

“I couldn’t help but go back to a poem that was written by one of Australia’s greatest authors, if not greatest writer, in Henry Lawson.”

Malinauskas then read at length from Lawson’s The Duty of Australians.

‘Tis the duty of Australians, in the bush and in the town,

To forever praise their country, but to run no other down.

When a man or nation visits, in the heyday of its pride,

‘Tis the duty of Australians to be kind but dignified…

‘Tis our duty to the stranger – landed may be but an hour —

To give all the information and assistance in our power.

To give audience to the new chum and to let the old chums wait,

Lest his memory be embittered by his first days in the State.

‘Tis our duty, when he’s foreign, and his English very young,

To find out and take him somewhere where he’ll hear his native tongue.

To give him our last spare moment, and our pleasure to defer—

He’ll be father of Australians, as our foreign fathers were!“

“Lawson was onto something,” Malinauskas said.

“That has remained true to this day in our island continent that we call home. And it’s why Australians should be patriotic and can be proud of what our nation stands for.

“Because it is distinct. Australians’ version of patriotism is a little different to our northern hemisphere friends. We are famous for being just a little bit more laid back.

“That is to say, less brash and boastful, and more dogged and determined. We can and we should wave our flag with pride, knowing that Aussie patriotism sometimes means sitting with a stranger and having a cuppa or a frothy and arguing about the footy. Not our faith,” he said.

“It’s been a hot summer in Australia. So maybe we should all look forward to the temperature coming down just a little bit.

“So that when we sing the national anthem with pride, we don’t forget there is a second verse which reminds us. It reminds us that when we all combine, we can achieve anything.

“When we work together, diversity has always been our greatest strength.”

Malinauskas’s homily was a targeted response to the divisiveness and prejudice that One Nation – which had polled strongly in that day’s election – has fed on and fanned.

Using the touchstones of the past, poetry and patriotism, Malinauskas linked modernity and nostalgia. Of course critics might point to the romanticisation and blanking out of the negatives – Australia in Lawson’s time had racial exclusion as its official policy.

Contrast Albanese’s more confrontational messaging at the weekend when he highlighted the difference between the old and new Australia.

Speaking at a Vietnamese function he also drew on history, referring to the ending of the White Australia policy by the Whitlam Government just before the arrival of Vietnamese refugees.

“We need to be vigilant,” he said, in lines directed as much to the Labor base and progressives as to the people in the room.

“There are some, including some in political life, who want to turn back the clock to an Australia that is no longer who we are.

“And we need to call out those people.

“And we need to continue to cherish our diversity as a strength for our nation, which it is.”

Albanese is often inclined to berate people critical of modern Australia, by saying, in effect, get used to the new reality. Malinauskas sought to find common threads between the old and new orders.

Albanese risks alienating voters who hanker after former times. The words of Malinauskas are aimed at giving them food for thought.

– ref. View from The Hill: Albanese could learn from Malinauskas’ masterclass in messaging – https://theconversation.com/view-from-the-hill-albanese-could-learn-from-malinauskas-masterclass-in-messaging-278790

Fuel crisis: Diesel shortages could hit power supply on Stewart Island

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

Diesel and petrol prices have now hit $4 per litre on Rakiura Stewart Island. RNZ / Nate McKinnon

Rakiura locals fear surging fuel prices will soon send their power bills rocketing up, and that Stewart Island – which relies on diesel generators for electricity – may face blackouts.

Stewart Island is home to about 400 people and it burns through about 1000 litres of diesel a day to create electricity.

Diesel and petrol prices have now hit $4 per litre on the island as the United States and Israel’s war against Iran continues.

Sharon Ross – one of the owners of the island’s only service station – said the last week had been the busiest they had seen since the Covid-19 pandemic, as people rushed to fill up and beat rising prices.

“People are concerned about how high it’s going to go. There’s been lots of joking that we should have tissues at the counter to mop up the tears after they’ve filled their tanks,” she said.

“People are concerned about the supply, and they’re also concerned that we’ll run out of power because we have five generators operating on diesel, and if they can’t keep the diesel up to them what that would mean to the island.”

Power prices were so far stable, but Ross said it was a waiting game.

“Our average power bill here is between $500 and $700 a month, which is also the same as our home one. So it’s frightening to think how much that might increase,” she said.

“Everything’s affected here because everything arrives by freight to the island so all those cartage bills will go up.”

Southland district councillor Jon Spraggon, from the Rakiura ward, said high diesel prices would likely push up power prices on the island.

“Power is 84 cents a unit here at the moment, where it goes is an unknown factor. Diesel prices have gone up a fairly substantial percentage and I would suspect our price would go up by a similar percentage,” he said.

But his biggest concern was ongoing supply of diesel.

“If we were to run out of diesel, then the electrical supply on the island would cut out. Things like our communication with the mainland, our connections with the mainland, the airline, the ferry services all rely on fuel,” he said.

Spraggon said diesel was delivered to the island twice a week and at the moment that was still happening, but these were uncertain times.

He wanted the government to keep Stewart Island in mind as the fuel situation worsened.

“When they’re looking at it and in future perhaps rationing or anything like that, Stewart Island needs to be a special case because of its remoteness and and it’s total dependency on diesel,” he said

He said the district council was in the process of installing a solar farm on the island to supplement diesel generation, but that was still eight months away.

Stewart Island Backpackers owner Aaron Joy said businesses were being hit hard by escalating fuel prices.

“We run the hostel on Stewart Island and we’re covering the costs at the moment but there will come a time where if it keeps going up we have to pass that onto our clients,” he said.

The Southland District Council said it was monitoring the situation and would discuss its options with the Stewart Island community board.

It said while the Stewart Island Electrical Supply Authority did have reserves, it was not meant to be a buffer for fuel prices.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

High petrol prices: Cost of public transport ‘still a significant barrier to people’

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

Auckland had its busiest day on public transport since 2019 last week, and the capital has seen 10 percent more passengers on the train in the past month. File photo. Supplied / Environment Canterbury

A cheaper bus or train fare would be far better than working from home to avoid rising fuel prices, say commuters, despite the local government minister ruling it out.

Simon Watts says the government is not looking at any change or incentive model in regards to public transport.

“Public transport usage by New Zealanders has already increased, we’ve seen that flow through in our major urban cities,” he said.

“That’s obviously a result of Kiwis making the conscious decision to take public transport versus driving their vehicle and that’s what you’d expect with prices at the pump being higher.”

He said it should be up to New Zealanders to make their own decisions, based on their own circumstances.

But petrol has sky-rocketed by more than 83 cents a litre and diesel has shot up $1.33 since the US and Israel began attacking Iran.

Auckland Transport, Greater Wellington, and Canterbury Regional Councils are asking the government to encourage people to use more buses, trains, and ferries – rather than work from home.

People RNZ spoke to in central Auckland on Monday said they would prefer that.

“I do like working from home but working in the office is also really nice, it’s more collaborative,” said one commuter.

“I would prefer to have cheaper public transport,” said another.

Shay Peters from Robert Walters Recruitment Agency said a lot of jobseekers preferred to work from home.

“As we’re in tougher economic times, people are probably erring on the side of caution and will like to be in the office but I know a number would also like the opportunity on balance to be able to just save cash and be working from home at the moment.”

Last Tuesday was Auckland’s busiest day on public transport since 2019, and the capital has seen 10 percent more passengers on the train – and six percent on the bus – within the past month.

Greater Wellington Regional Council Public Transport Committee chair Ros Connelly would also like to see subsidised fares.

“There’s no doubt in my mind and from the surveys and customer feedback that we receive that the cost of public transport still is a significant barrier to people. Obviously since we’ve seen the fuel crisis, comparatively the cost of public transport has decreased but still it is extremely expensive.”

She said the train from Masterton to Wellington can cost up to $22.50 each way, per day.

“That is a barrier for many people and so they will look at other options. Working from home is definitely popular but if there was an increased subsidy we’re really confident that we would see more people on public transport and as fuel prices increase this is one way that the government can ensure that people get to work.”

Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick said it was a no-brainer to make public transport free.

“Fares have gone up by as much as a third in Canterbury, by a quarter in the Manawatū-Whanganui region and Auckland also has seen fare increases in the realm of 15 to 20 percent over the last three years. We need to remove those barriers to access and also be reserving fuel supply for those who actually need it and don’t currently have the option.”

Stacey van der Putten from Auckland Transport would welcome that.

“We’re monitoring it daily so there will be adjustments that are needed but the system does have flex to be able to support it.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Canterbury leads ASB’s rankings as Auckland rebounds and Wellington finishes last

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

ASB said Canterbury secured its third quarterly win of 2025. RNZ / Nate McKinnon

ASB’s latest Regional Economic Scoreboard shows Canterbury leading New Zealand’s regional growth, Auckland making strong gains, and Wellington slipping to the bottom of the rankings.

Canterbury scored back-to-back economic wins in ASB’s latest regional economic survey.

Canterbury finished the final quarter of 2025 on a strong note, once again topping ASB’s Regional Economic Scoreboard as the country’s best‑performing regional economy.

Otago and Waikato tied for second place, while Auckland jumped from seventh to fourth.

ASB said Canterbury secured its third quarterly win of 2025, outperforming the rest of the country in employment, retail spending, housing activity and population growth.

Chief economist Nick Tuffley said the South Island continued to lead New Zealand’s multi‑speed recovery.

“Canterbury has delivered back‑to‑back wins to close out the year, supported by strong dairy incomes, steady jobs growth, resilient consumer spending and the recovery of the tourism sector,” he said.

Otago’s ranking was boosted by a strong tourism rebound, while Waikato benefited from a robust primary sector and an improving labour market.

ASB expects the upcoming Fonterra capital return from the sale of Mainland to further lift dairy farming regions through increased spending and investment.

Auckland’s rise was driven by gains in retail spending, construction activity and consumer confidence, although its labour market remains subdued.

Tuffley said Auckland’s move up the rankings showed the economic upswing was widening beyond the regions that led earlier in the cycle.

At the other end of the table, Wellington finished last, weighed down by ongoing weakness in the housing market, construction activity and discretionary spending, despite relatively strong employment growth.

Tuffley said Wellington’s economy should improve, helped by low interest rates, but emerging challenges could slow the pace of recovery.

Nationally, ASB said the economy showed signs of growth in the final quarter of 2025 as lower interest rates lifted retail spending and employment indicators stabilised.

However, Tuffley warned the conflict in the Middle East would pose fresh headwinds through higher energy costs and rising inflation.

“The situation and extent of any impact to growth and inflation is highly uncertain and will depend on how long the conflict goes on for,” he said.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Flu vaccine in a spray: ‘Many, many people are just not keen on needles’

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

The FluMist vaccine is taken in the form of a nasal spray. File photo. 123RF

Bringing a needle-free flu vaccine to New Zealand would be a good way to boost the country’s vaccination rates, says a vaccine expert.

FluMist has long been used in the northern hemisphere and started being used in Australia this year.

The vaccine is taken in the form of a nasal spray, bypassing the need for an injection.

Immunisation Advisory Centre principal medical advisor Professor Nikki Turner is calling for pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca to bring FluMist to New Zealand, saying needles are “way more of a barrier than we realise”.

“Many, many people are just not keen on needles, so you put off doing things because you really don’t want the needle,” she said.

“So it’s important we recognise that and respond to that, and this is one useful way to do that.”

She said FluMist had only recently become available in the southern hemisphere, because each hemisphere had slightly different flu strains.

“The reason why it’s not well established in the southern hemisphere is that each year you have to change the formulation in the flu vaccine to match the circulating strains, and so they’ve done that for the northern hemisphere but the company haven’t really been in a position to do that for the southern hemisphere [until recently],” she said.

Since the vaccine had been approved for use in Australia, Professor Turner expected it would be easy for the company to get approval in New Zealand.

But she said it was up to AstraZeneca to pitch the vaccine to Medsafe.

“The company has to present it to Medsafe for licensure. That should be pretty straightforward, but it has to be presented by the company to Medsafe and for the company to do that they’d want to know they would get decent sales,” she explained.

“So we want to say this would be great for the New Zealand market, we have a significant burden of flu on our young children and we think this would be a great vaccine to have available to move away from injectible vaccines.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Fuel cost crisis: Govt to unveil ‘targeted and temporary’ support tomorrow

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

The finance minister will reveal “targeted and temporary” support for hard-hit families on Tuesday, as fuel costs continue to rise.

Nicola Willis gave notice of the announcement at Monday’s post-Cabinet media briefing, alongside Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Associate Energy Minister Shane Jones.

Jones also announced plans to align New Zealand’s fuel standards with that of Australia, allowing the import of fuel destined for Australia to New Zealand instead.

Willis said the decisions on support had been taken at Cabinet, and while some of the details were still being worked out, that would not affect how quickly families could get it.

“This conflict is impacting just about every New Zealander, it has pushed up the price of petrol, diesel and jet fuel and those increases are already hurting our people and our businesses. Unfortunately the government is not in a position to mitigate that impact on everyone,” she said.

“The approach we are taking is consistent with the findings of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the response to the Covid pandemic, which highlighted the damage that can be done by untimely, untemporary and untargeted spending.”

It was unclear when the support would be rolled out, with Willis saying that would be made clear when it was announced.

Motorists should fuel up as and when they needed to, she said, with the government’s solution set to target income rather than fuel prices.

‘No concerns’ about fuel supply

For now, there were no concerns about fuel supplies in New Zealand, she said.

“To date, all shipments have arrived as scheduled and fuel importers have not raised any concerns about shipments that are due here in future.

“It remains the case that we have to be prepared for the possibility of disruptions in the medium to longer term, particularly because the refineries in Southeast Asia from which we import more than 90 percent of our fuel may have challenges getting the feedstock crude oil that they need.”

Luxon said the country had at least enough fuel for the next seven weeks, although the government was preparing in case of long-term further disruption.

“If you are someone who has just faced a 30 percent increase in your fuel bill or a 60 percent increase in your diesel bill since the actual crisis, since this conflict has commenced, it’s real.

“We cannot do the Covid learnings and mistakes, which was just spray a heap of money around that has short term gain but long term pain – massive long-term pain – and equally we’ve got to find a way to get people support in a temporary, targeted kind of way.

“The reality is that we are not going to be able to alleviate the pressure of rising prices for everyone, but what we’ve been clear about are the parameters for any support that we provide, which is that it must be targeted, it must be timely, and it must be temporary and not drive inflation or debt higher.”

The latest data from Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment showed stocks for about 47 days of fuel, including about 50 days worth of petrol, 46 days of diesel, and 45 of jet fuel.

The data, accurate to last Wednesday, marks about two days fewer than was reported last week.

One new fuel shipment arrived on Sunday, and two more – carrying between them another 20 days of each kind of fuel – are expected to arrive in the next fortnight.

The next update is due on Wednesday, but the ministry says New Zealand is not yet experiencing the kind of sustained disruption that would justify emergency measures under the national fuel plan.

Luxon said nothing had changed about New Zealand’s position on the Iran conflict, but that Iranians “holding hostage a whole bunch of ships to bring fuel and critical supplies … that’s not acceptable”.

“What we want to see is a quick resolution to this conflict and that means that actually respecting civilians and civilian infrastructure is really important … we think the best thing is de-escalation.”

Willis confirmed some consideration had been given to which industries could be prioritised if fuel rationing was needed, but this would not be revealed until a later date.

“We will not be having to hit the button tomorrow, but we will outline what our proposed phasing of response is … we recognise that it’s useful for people to understand what could be coming under a range of scenarios,” she said.

She noted the high prices would also naturally limit fuel use.

“It is pinching people’s pockets already and that is changing people’s choices. So Auckland transport have reported they had their biggest day of public transport use in seven years, I think that’s people deciding to use their cars a little bit less because it’s pretty expensive right now.”

‘Anzac pact’ in fuel and other standards

Jones outlined the government’s plan to temporarily allow fuel that meets Australian specifications to be supplied to the New Zealand market for up to a year.

Fuel companies had said this could allow them to secure shipments more quickly, and from a wider pool of suppliers.

Jones said long-range vessels typically carried about 120 million litres, and New Zealand consumed about 24 million litres of fuel a day – with about 47 percent of that being diesel, about 35 percent being petrol, and the remainder being aviation fuel.

“Should such a vessel be on its way to Australia then we would have the ability to also benefit from such a vessel.”

He said fuel refined to Australian standards was compatible with New Zealand vehicles, and met safety and quality expectations, pushing back on the suggestion it would allow dirtier fuels than under current standards.

“It’s unkind of us to refer to our Aussie compatriots as dirty,” he said. “There’s two things – whether or not fuel used in a high-temperature northern Australian environment, we are advised that a lot of that fuel is suitable for the North Island … with the South Island the fuel importers assure us that they will have the optionality to service both of those markets.”

He said officials had spoken to Australian counterparts.

“We pushed the idea that at some point in time we should explore and ANZAC pact and I would say to you this is the first step that we’re taking to join forces.

“It’d be fair to say that I’ve got a fair degree of support in our Cabinet to actually move towards permanent harmonisation of not only these standards but a variety of other standards in the economy.”

Willis and the associate ministers of finance would make further improvements, he said.

The government would not follow Australia’s lead in relaxing standards to allow higher-sulphur fuel, he said, at least not yet.

“At this stage it’s not our intention to do so, however, we will take advice should the situation change – and that could be an option that expands our supply.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

‘Maniacal tyrant’ Trump and Iran trade threats to energy infrastructure over Strait of Hormuz

By -

SPECIAL REPORT: By Jessica Corbett

Democrats in Congress have sounded the alarm over US President Donald Trump pledging to commit more war crimes in Iran after he traded threats to energy infrastructure with the Iranian government, with the Republican declaring Saturday that he would take out the country’s power plants unless it reopened the Strait of Hormuz to all traffic.

Just a day after Trump claimed that “we are getting very close to meeting our objectives as we consider winding down our great Military efforts in the Middle East with respect to the Terrorist Regime of Iran,” in a post that remains pinned to the top of his Truth Social profile, the president took to the platform with a clear threat on Saturday night.

“If Iran doesn’t FULLY OPEN, WITHOUT THREAT, the Strait of Hormuz, within 48 HOURS from this exact point in time, the United States of America will hit and obliterate their various POWER PLANTS, STARTING WITH THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST!” Trump said.

Trump’s post came after Ali Mousavi, the Iranian representative to the International Maritime Organisation, told the Chinese news agency Xinhua on Friday that the Strait of Hormuz — the waterway between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman that is a key shipping route, including for fossil fuels — remains open to all vessels not linked to “Iran’s enemies.”

It also followed the Israeli military — which is bombing Iran alongside the United States — suggesting that the US was responsible for a Saturday attack on Iran’s uranium enrichment complex in Natanz.

According to The Associated Press, with his new threat, Trump “may have meant the Bushehr nuclear power plant, Iran’s biggest, which was already hit last week, or Damavand, a natural gas plant near Tehran, Iran’s capital.”

Responding to Trump’s Saturday post, US Representative Don Beyer (D-Va.) said: “It’s important not to shy away from candidly discussing the president’s increasingly erratic behaviour. His worsening instability is a clear and growing threat, not only to the American people but to the world.”

Hell-bent on destruction
Representative Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.) was similarly critical  over Trump’s pledge “From ‘help is on the way’ for Iranian protestors to threatening war crimes against an entire population. The United States is being run by a maniacal tyrant hell-bent on destroying this country and the world along with it.”

Other critics also pointed out that Article 56 of the Geneva Convention states in part that “works or installations containing dangerous forces, namely dams, dykes, and nuclear electrical generating stations, shall not be made the object of attack, even where these objects are military objectives, if such attack may cause the release of dangerous forces and consequent severe losses among the civilian population.”

The AP reported that after that strike on the Natanz complex, “Iranian missiles struck two communities in southern Israel late Saturday, leaving buildings shattered and dozens injured in dual attacks not far from Israel’s main nuclear research center.”

“Israel’s military said it was not able to intercept missiles that hit the southern cities of Dimona and Arad, the largest near the centre in Israel’s sparsely populated Negev desert,” according to the news agency. “It was the first time Iranian missiles penetrated Israel’s air defence systems in the area around the nuclear site.”

Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Speaker of Iran’s Parliament, said on X on Saturday that “if the Israeli regime is unable to intercept missiles in the heavily protected Dimona area, it is, operationally, a sign of entering a new phase of the battle… Israel’s skies are defenseless.”

After Trump’s threat, the Speaker added on Sunday that “immediately after the power plants and infrastructure in our country are targeted, the critical infrastructure, energy infrastructure, and oil facilities throughout the region will be considered legitimate targets and will be irreversibly destroyed, and the price of oil will remain high for a long time.”

Jessica Corbett is a senior editor and staff writer for Common Dreams. This article is republished under Creative Commons.

Article by AsiaPacificReport.nz

As it happened: Oil prices rise as fall out from Middle East crisis continues

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says the government will reveal in the next few weeks how it will support New Zealanders struggling with skyrocketing fuel prices.

He says the country has healthy fuel stocks, and the government’s doing everything it can to secure them.

Oil prices have risen as the fall out continues from the Middle East crisis; Brent Crude oil rose about US$1 to be just above US$113 a barrel in early Asia trade.

It comes after US President Donald Trump vowed to ‘obliterate’ Iran energy facilities if it doesn’t open Strait of Hormuz.

Meanwhile, Auckland Transport is calling for the government to encourage more people to use public transport.

Follow what happened today in our liveblog below:

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Police seek boat last seen in Northland bay

By -

Source: Radio New Zealand

The 25-foot vessel ‘JAGMEN’. Supplied

Police are appealing for sightings of a boat last seen in Taurikura Bay on Sunday night.

The 25-foot vessel – named ‘JAGMEN’ – was last seen leaving the bay about 8pm on 22 March, said police.

“Police would like to speak with an occupant believed to be onboard, to ensure their safety.”

Anyone who has any information about the whereabouts of the boat and its occupant is urged to contact police.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

1...272829...1,291Page 28 of 1,291
Listen on Apple Podcasts

- Advertisement -
© Copyright 2024 EveningReport.nz and Multimedia Investments Ltd. All rights reserved.