Page 27

Part of SH35 on East Coast raised to help performance in wet weather

Source: Radio New Zealand

The completed project which stood up well to heavy rain in January. Suppled / NZTA

A critical section of State Highway 35 has been raised by almost a metre as part of an upgrade to make the road more flood resilient.

The New Zealand Transport Agency says the 230 metre section at Rototahe, just south of Tolaga Bay, is typically the first to flood and close during extreme weather events.

The now completed upgrade will help reduce road closures and keep it open during severe weather and emergencies.

Six new culverts have also been installed and two more upgraded, increasing the site’s water-carrying capacity.

Transport Rebuild East Coast alliance was responsible for the work.

Project manager Richard Bayley said the upgrade has already proven its value.

“We were pleased to see that it performed well in the late January rain event, as the road had been lifted to its final height. This work is an example of the resilience being built into the network and will provide communities, freight and first responders with a more reliable route.”

Suppled / NZTA

TREC partnered with local Iwi Te Aitanga-a-Hauiti throughout the project. Kaitiaki lead Anne McGuire said the project reflected the importance of SH35 to local communities.

“SH35 is a lifeline for our communities. This upgrade will make a real difference to those that travel this road to Gisborne regularly,” she said.

Work on the second flood resilience site which is being funded through cost savings – SH2 Hakanui Straight project (formerly Nesbitt’s Dip) – is expected to be completed next month.

The highway has been raised by around 3 metres and culverts have been installed to help manage water and protect the road. Remaining work on the project includes road surfacing and marking, safety barriers and signage.

As of January, almost 90 percent of the overall Tai Rāwhiti recovery programme has been completed.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

War can be good for your KiwiSaver, but are you ok with that?

Source: Radio New Zealand

Smoke rises from the site of an Israeli airstrike on the southern suburbs of Beirut on March 3, 2026. AFP

KiwiSaver funds with exposure to oil and defence stocks might benefit from conflict in the Middle East in the short term, but providers are divided on whether to invest in them.

Oil prices have increased and stocks in companies that make weapons have also lifted.

Follow updates with RNZ’s blog

Over the past year, the share price of Lockheed Martin has lifted almost 50 percent.

It could mean investors and funds with exposure to those sectors record better returns in the short term than those who have taken an ethical stance against fossil fuels, or against investments in weapons.

“Defence stocks will outperform,” Koura founder Rupert Carlyon said.

“Not just because of this, we’ve got to think about the significant increase in defence spending across the globe over the last 12 or 24 months and what’s expected to continue. Particularly with Europe slowly increasing their defence spending towards 5 percent of GDP.”

He said he was not opposed to invest in companies that made weapons.

“The question we need to ask ourselves is why is it wrong to invest in defence stocks? The world is a pretty ugly place…. there are a lot of bad actors out there, right?

“Whether you’re concerned about Russia, China, North Korea, Iran… at the end of the day we need weapons. There’s no hiding the fact a world without weapons made in the West is a world controlled by people that we do not want controlling the world.

“We need to think really hard around our weapons exemptions – I understand we might not like cluster bombs, and other things that are deemed illegal. But the truth is we need defence contractors. We need weapons.”

But Berry said it was a decision that needed to be made by investors according to their own ethical viewpoint.

“It’s a very personal question. And for me personally, I don’t want my KiwiSaver – to the extent absolutely possible – I don’t want my KiwiSaver invested in profiting from war.”

He said investors in weapons companies could not discern whether they were supporting weapons used offensively or defensively.

“The question is, do you want a connection with conflict in your KiwiSaver?”

Companies like Lockheed Martin, General Dynamic, Northrop Grumman and RTX had generated strong returns in the last one, three and five years.

But investors should remember they were only 2 percent or 3 percent of the S&P500 index. Carlyon said the average KiwiSaver probably only had about 0.1 percent added to their return in the last year from defence stocks.

US sailors at work as they taxi aircraft to a staging point on the flight deck of the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln in support of Operation Epic Fury, at an undisclosed location on February 28, 2026. AFP/Handout

Oil versus lower carbon economy

Oil also posed questions investors had to grapple with.

“The question with oil is from an ethical perspective, it is problematic because we’re in a world that needs to transition to a lower carbon economy,” Berry said.

“If you look at oil companies, they have had strong performance for the last year. And while, although oil itself, West Texas Intermediate was up 5 percent overnight, but it’s actually slightly lower than it was three years ago.

“But oil companies have done well. Again …oil is about 3.5 percent of the S&P index. And so you compare that to technology at 33 percent, financials and banks at 13 percent, and healthcare at 10 percent.”

He said KiwiSaver was designed to be a long-term investment and in the past 10 years, oil and defence stocks had returned slightly less than the US market average. Technology stocks have been much stronger – recording such an increase that there have been fears of an AI bubble forming.

Marika Khabazi

The founder of Mindful Money, Barry Coates said investors might react by thinking they should invest more in fossil fuels to make higher returns from supply disruptions.

“This temptation to go for short-term returns may override their ethical position to use their investment to support the energy transition. Others may choose to maintain their ethical principles, and recognise that oil price instability is more likely to result in a more rapid transition to renewable energy.”

He said it could be argued that the oil supply disruption and likely increase in the price of oil had already been taken into account in the forward prices of oil and share prices of some oil companies had already risen.

“Financial analysts in the US have been far closer to the politics of launching bombing on Iran than NZ commentators or members of the public.

“Oil price rises are often temporary. For example, the price increases after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine had a short blip on oil prices and oil and gas company share prices. Both measures soon resumed their pattern over the past decade, which has been to significantly under-perform the S&P500.

“The impacts may vary between individual companies in unpredictable ways. For example, with supply disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz. These disruptions might affect different companies in different ways.”

Gold has also been pushed up by the uncertainty, which Berry said was a rational move to safe assets.

Overall, equity markets have largely taken the turmoil in their stride so far.

The Vix index, which measures volatility, was on Tuesday morning at about half the level it was when President Donald Trump announced tariffs in April last year.

Berry said what happened from here would depend on how long the war continued and whether there was a regime change in Iran.

“What happens in terms of disruption globally? How is oil and shipping distribution impacted globally and for how long? And you really need to answer those questions to know what the long-term impact is.”

He said KiwiSaver members should remember they were diversified across asset classes and countries and that would reduce risk.

“Get your risk profile right, focus on the long term, and think about values you want to take into account in your investing, particularly around weapons and whether you want to be profiting from war.”

Carlyon agreed the market response had so far been much more muted than had been feared.

Sign up for Money with Susan Edmunds, a weekly newsletter covering all the things that affect how we make, spend and invest money.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Liam Lawson ‘still learning’ as F1 opener looms in Melbourne

Source: Radio New Zealand

Liam Lawson. AFP

New Zealand driver Liam Lawson says he’s still coming to grips with a “sensitive” car in Melbourne as he targets a strong start to his second full season in Formula One.

This weekend’s opening Australian Grand Prix provides uncertainty and apprehension for pundits, team management and drivers alike because of major changes to car specifications.

Several top drivers emerged unimpressed with the alterations, which include smaller, lighter chassis and new power units which comprise a 50-50 split between combustion and beefed-up batteries. There is also the introduction of 100 percent sustainable fuels.

Four-time world champion Max Verstappen was disparaging, the Dutch Red Bull great describing the changes as “anti-racing” and as like “Formula E on steroids” during pre-season testing.

Liam Lawson AFP

Lawson was less outspoken but admitted battery management in particular was playing on his mind after some mixed testing results for Racing Bulls.

“It’s very different from last year, much more sensitive, particularly when it comes to preparing the battery for a qualifying lap and managing over a longer stint,” he said.

“On top of that, the cars have significantly less aero, which makes them more difficult to drive and less forgiving overall.

“We became aware of the new regulations early last year and began preparing straight away. So by the time I first drove the new car, I had a solid understanding of what to expect and the key differences between the 2025 and 2026 cars.

“Some weren’t a surprise, but when you get in the car, you are definitely still learning how to optimise.”

Racing Bulls chose to retain Lawson’s services after last year’s roller-coaster campaign in which he racked up seven top-10 finishes from 24 races – the first two rounds having been behind the wheel for Red Bull before he was unceremoniously demoted to the sister team.

Liam Lawson of Red Bull Racing. 2025. PHOTOSPORT

The 24-year-old finished 14th overall, with a best placing of fifth coming in Azerbaijan.

Lawson has been paired with 18-year-old British rookie Arvin Lindblad at Racing Bulls, making theirs the least experienced driver lineup on the 11-team grid.

The Kiwi said it was hard to set goals for the season, given the uncertainty around car performance.

“It’s still difficult to say where we stand, as we don’t yet have a clear picture of our true pace,” he said.

“Of course, the objective is to score points, but on a personal level, my focus is on extracting the maximum from myself and delivering the best possible performance every time I’m in the car.”

There are two practice sessions on Friday, followed by a third on Saturday and qualifying.

Sunday’s race is scheduled to start at 5pm NZT.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

How do airlines judge when and where it’s safe to fly near a conflict zone?

Source: Radio New Zealand

PUNIT PARANJPE / AFP

The conflict in the Middle East is continuing to disrupt global air traffic with nearly 4000 flights a day being cancelled across the region.

Limited flights out of Dubai and Doha were announced after airspace partially reopened on Wednesday morning.

However, hundreds of thousands of passengers were still being impacted, with major airport hubs remain largely out of action.

But how do airlines and other authorities decide when and where it’s safe to fly near a conflict zone?

UK-based aviation expert John Strickland told Nine to Nine it was very much dependant on the government and safety agencies.

“They could be global, such as United Nations, there’s an aviation body, ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organisation), which is affiliated with the UN.

“Of course, national security bodies, including representation of embassies and consulates and so on, military intelligence agencies.

“All of that has to be put together. Certainly, it is guided through a body like ICAO with the aim of sharing that information transparently as widely as possible and airlines take those briefings. They don’t make a judgement of their own.”

‘No airline would endeavour to make a commercial risk’

Strickland said airlines had reasonable intelligence by virtue of their size and resources it can tap into.

Others may be fully dependent on external safety agencies, he said.

Emirates cancelled flights through Doha and Dubai. Thierry Monasse

“But certainly, one thing I would say is no airline would endeavour to make a commercial risk, a punt if you like, to fly just because they had passengers to move,” he said.

“Nobody will do anything until they are given the maximum possible assurance that safety and security can be guaranteed for obviously the passengers and their crews as well.”

Strickland said questions over GPS interference and other navigation challenges in or near conflict zones were also considered.

“It has to be factored in as part of the audit, part of the safety checklist as to whether a flight operation can be undertaken safely or not,” he said.

“Indeed, whether it might be possible to operate, but a different route would have to be followed if those risks are known about in certain areas.”

Strickland said repositioning an aircraft and its crews to mitigate the challenges in the Middle East were complex and expensive.

“The complexity of getting aircraft and crews back to the right place is enormous … the first thing is once an aircraft is lost somewhere else, they’ve landed, even if it’s in a planned airport, once that crew has completed their flight, they are out of duty hours based on whatever national regulatory body they come under.

“Certainly, whether it’s New Zealand or Europe, for example, there are clear regulations in place about rest requirements … crews have to have rest. It means with many crews are not where they should be. They’re not available to start afresh from home at the home base to take up new operations.

“The aircraft have to be recovered back to base and undoubtedly cleaned and checked out before they can go back into service.”

Airlines count the cost

He said it took a number of days, and in such a military-induced challenged, it would take even longer, and be more expensive.

Strickland said airlines were also trying to provide accommodation to stranded passengers, which was a positive sign.

He said there were only a handful of flights currently operating, but remained a small fraction of their usual operations.

Strickland said while the level of disruption couldn’t compare to the Covid-19 pandemic – as it affected everyone globally – it was comparable to the 9/11 attacks.

“The hub airports in the Gulf, Dubai, Abu Dhabi and Doha, and the airlines operating out of those at Emirates, Qatar Airways and Etihad have now become such a key part of the global aviation landscape that they are major gateways,” he said.

“They account for about half a million passengers in and out of those three airports every day or last year, 180 million people in a year.

“A large number of those are people transiting … there are people going to and from those airports, but a large number of people, not least to and from New Zealand, transiting in those airports.

“When this happened and flying ceased, there’ll be probably a couple of hundred thousand people may be stuck in Dubai airport, Abu Dhabi, Doha Airport, who were not even due to be there for more than a few hours and suddenly found themselves in this limbo.”

That’s the headache that airlines have got to slowly extricate themselves from as they can do so safely, he said.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

New Zealand faces shortage of ultra-luxury housing

Source: Radio New Zealand

A luxury house in Arrowtown. Supplied

Latest house sales data indicates there is a shortage of ultra-luxury housing to meet the requirements of high-net-worth immigrants.

Changes to the Active Investor Plus visa, which take effect next week, limit house-buying immigrants to homes priced over $5 million.

Data collected by sales portal realestate.co.nz indicates the tightest house supply constraints were emerging well above that level, with only 142 properties listed above $10m available nationwide.

International premium-grade homes priced more than $20m were scarce.

A luxury house in Remuera, Auckland. Supplied

Realestate.co.nz chief executive Sarah Wood said the top end of New Zealand’s residential property market was relatively immature by global standards.

“The AIP visa programme effectively introduces a positive demand shock into this segment of the market overnight, however, the supply has not had a chance to grow organically over time. The result is significant pressure on the supply of houses valued in the tens of millions.”

Realestate.co.nz chief executive Sarah Wood. Supplied

Data supplied by Immigration NZ indicates nearly 590 people from 33 countries have so far applied for residency under the AIP visa programme.

Agents reported a growing segment of applicants who were only interested in property priced more than $20m, with demand outstripping supply by about five times.

Portal data indicated there had been 36,000 overseas-based searches for homes price over $5m over the past year, with North America and UK making up over a third (34 percent).

“The United States accounts for around a fifth (19 percent) of international $5 million-plus searches, followed by the United Kingdom at 9 percent and Canada at 4 percent. That profile reflects demand from established wealth markets rather than speculative traffic.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Severe irritability in teens can be reduced by daily doses of vitamins and minerals – new research

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Julia J Rucklidge, Professor of Psychology, University of Canterbury

Irritability is one of the most common and distressing problems teenagers and their families face.

Its main symptom is an excessive reaction to negative emotional stimuli, resulting in temper outbursts and severe irritable mood.

While current treatment options such as psychotherapy and medications are helpful for some, they can be inaccessible or poorly tolerated.

Our new research, based on a double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial, shows broad-spectrum micronutrients (vitamins and minerals) can significantly reduce severe irritability in teenagers. Teens with severely disruptive behaviour experienced especially large improvements.

This offers a safe, scalable and biologically grounded alternative to conventional psychiatric treatments.

Urgent need for more effective treatments

Irritability cuts across many psychiatric presentations, including anxiety, depression, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and other disruptive behaviour disorders.

The need for interventions that directly target irritability, have fewer side effects and are available to all communities is urgent.

Statistics on mental health in young people are especially concerning. Youth mental health has been declining globally over the past two decades and has now reached a “dangerous phase”, according to a Lancet commission.

Despite this, research consistently highlights a lack of effective and accessible treatments for severely irritable youth. This suggests a significant unmet public health need.

Our research findings are based on the Balancing Emotions of Adolescents with Micronutrients (BEAM) trial, in which 132 unmedicated teenagers (aged 12 to 17) with moderate to severe irritability were randomly assigned to micronutrients (taken as four pills three times a day) or an active placebo for eight weeks. They were monitored monthly online by a clinical psychologist.

The placebo response was high, suggesting that simply participating in the study helped many teens feel able to improve their behaviour. But micronutrients still outperformed the placebo across key clinical measures such as irritability, emotional reactivity and overall improvement.

We saw the strongest effects in teenagers with disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD), with 64% responding to micronutrients compared to 12.5% on placebo. This demonstrates an unusually large effect for a psychiatric intervention.

Parents of participants receiving micronutrients rated the teens’ conduct and prosocial behaviour much higher compared with those of teens on placebo.

Micronutrient treatment was also associated with more rapid improvements in clinician‑rated irritability, parent‑reported dysphoria and teen‑reported quality of life, stress and prosocial behaviours.

One of the most notable and reassuring findings was that suicidal ideation, which about a quarter of study participants reported at the start of the trial, improved over time for both groups, but with a greater change for teens on micronutrients. Self-harm behaviour also decreased for both groups.

Only one side effect differed significantly between groups: diarrhoea was more common on micronutrients (20.9%) than placebo (6.2%). But this side effect was typically temporary and resolved by taking the nutrients with food and water.

A minority (fewer than 10%) found swallowing pills a challenge. Other side effects reported equally in both groups included occasional headaches, stomach aches or a dry mouth. These tended to dissipate within the first few weeks.

Socioeconomic background matters

The response to treatment was moderated by the teens’ socioeconomic status.

Participants from lower socioeconomic backgrounds were more likely to benefit from micronutrients. This is particularly meaningful for both clinical practice and public health.

Lower socioeconomic status is typically associated with greater exposure to nutritional insufficiencies, chronic stress, reduced access to health services and higher rates of mental health difficulties.

Our findings suggest micronutrients may help address underlying nutritional vulnerabilities that may be more prevalent or more severe in disadvantaged groups.

This pattern also indicates that micronutrient supplementation, if publicly funded, could function as a low‑cost, scalable intervention, with the potential to reduce health inequities.

Many evidence‑based psychosocial or pharmacological treatments require resources – time, transportation, specialist access – that disproportionately disadvantage lower‑income families.

In our trial, all meetings between the psychologist and the teen with their family were conducted online and the micronutrients were couriered across the country, making this intervention accessible, particularly to rural communities.

Micronutrients may represent an intervention that is both accessible and responsive to the specific needs of youth who are most at risk yet often least well served by traditional care pathways.

This study was developed alongside Māori health providers and fits within a tikanga (traditional) Māori framework. It had a high percentage of Māori participants (27%) and worked closely with them, their families and health providers to assist in improving mental health outcomes.

The BEAM trial provides robust evidence that a simple nutritional approach can meaningfully improve symptoms, including emotional reactivity, conduct difficulties and even suicidal ideation.

These results are relevant for parents, clinicians, teachers and policymakers seeking safe and practical interventions, especially for young people who cannot access or do not respond well to existing treatments. The results also highlight important equity implications, as teens from lower income families showed stronger responses.

Our results cast a new lens on the cause of some psychiatric problems, often conceptualised as chemical imbalances or family dysfunction. They reframe some cases of irritability as a possible nutritional and metabolic vulnerability, one that might be addressed with greater attention to the quality of our food alongside some supplementation with broad-spectrum micronutrients.

ref. Severe irritability in teens can be reduced by daily doses of vitamins and minerals – new research – https://theconversation.com/severe-irritability-in-teens-can-be-reduced-by-daily-doses-of-vitamins-and-minerals-new-research-276497

Global dairy prices continue to rise in wake of Middle East conflict

Source: Radio New Zealand

123RF

Supply pressure and buying interest saw dairy prices continue their climb at the latest Global Dairy Trade auction overnight.

The average price rose 5.7 percent overnight to US$4301 (NZ$7299) a tonne.

It was the fifth consecutive auction where prices have risen since the start of the year and followed a 3.6 percent rise at the previous one.

The New Zealand exchange’s head of dairy insights Cristina Alvarado said even though milk production has been high in the key global regions the volume on offer at the event was down.

She said Fonterra was the company with one of the biggest offerings, but New Zealand was now heading toward the end of its milking season.

“New Zealand’s milk production curve is now firmly in seasonal decline, and forward offer volumes through March to May indicate further easing,” she said.

“At the same time, growing domestic protein demand in the United States and new cheese capacity not yet operating at full utilisation are absorbing milk locally.”

She said with the tightness of product in the US demand was higher for certain products, particularly skim milk and butter.

“We’ve seen a pattern in this last year of more buying what you need rather than building large stocks.”

The important whole-milk powder price, which influences farmer payouts, rose 4.5 percent to US$3863 a tonne.

There were price gains across the board too with skim milk powder up 9.1 percent, along with butter up 6.1 percent, mozzarella 7.9 percent and cheddar 4.3 percent.

The regions which bought most of the product were North and South Asia, however, Alvarado said in terms of percentage buying there was an increase from those in Europe, the Middle East and Africa.

“With ongoing geopolitical tensions affecting Middle Eastern logistics and trade lanes, and in the absence of recent Algerian tenders in the region, it is notable that EMEA [Europe, the Middle East and Africa] participation strengthened rather than retreated.”

Alvarado said the Middle East was a “significant” and “growing” market for New Zealand – among our top three buyers.

“It’s definitely a key region and we would hope that despite everything going on and as we saw at the auction today they’re still buying product, even more so.”

While the conflict had brought “some logistics challenges”, she said it presented a competitive advantage for New Zealand in getting supply to its key buyers in Asia over other competitors in Europe.

Alvarado expected prices to remain steady with continued prices increases, though possibly at lesser rates.

“I don’t really see them dropping as there is a need for product and from our end we are heading towards the end of our season.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Government pushes back deadline for agencies’ project funding bids

Source: Radio New Zealand

It showed agencies such as in health, justice and education had faced a December deadline to make the case for their bids for this year’s Budget, but that had to be pushed back. RNZ

The government has been facing too much demand to fund infrastructure projects from agencies left with too little time to plan them, forcing it to push back a Budget 2026 deadline.

A newly-released Treasury report said significant trade-offs were still required.

It showed agencies such as in health, justice and education had faced a December deadline to make the case for their bids for this year’s Budget, but the deadline had to be pushed back.

“With agency capacity constraints being signalled in the QIR (quarterly investment report) for Budget 2026 we have extended this timeline to April 2026.”

The report on central government investments for the three months to September 2025 – the latest QIR available – said demand “significantly” exceeded available Budget allowances, though it blanked out the figure

That was also the case for the next four Budgets.

But because agencies had also spent only half what they expected in the quarter – $2.3 billion versus $4.7b forecast – the report held out hope that better planning could result in more investments that were “right-sized and deliverable”, reducing Budget bids.

A debate in Parliament on infrastructure was set for Wednesday.

This follows release of the country’s first National Infrastructure Plan last month that sparked a debate about building roads versus hospitals.

The QIR said there were “large differences between forecast and actual spend and reported delays once entering delivery”.

It also said agencies were continuing to signal funding requirements for Budget 2026 that “significantly exceed available allowances, with $38.2 billion capital signalled over the next five Budgets.

“Significant trade-offs are still required”.

It did not go into details of any possible trade-offs.

Treasury is developing advice on the medium-term capital pipeline due this month.

The QIR said agencies had been expected to have a full-fledged business case or a fast-track single-stage business case done “before submitting a Budget bid in December to ensure robust value for money advice from the Treasury”.

It was pushed back to April to ensure the builds would proceed quickly after the Budget. Last year there was still a backlog of 15 becalmed projects funded in Budget 2024; however, that number had been cut to just three in this QIR.

“The September 2025 QIR tells us that agency projections for timely conversion are looking better than previous quarters.”

This “Budget conversion” – converting from funding, to building – is a marker of momentum.

“We also need to keep momentum and scrutinise whether agencies have done enough planning to ensure that what gets funded in Budget 2026 is investment-ready and starts delivery within the 2026-27 financial year.”

To do that, Treasury was working with bosses of capital-intensive agencies – such as Defence, Health NZ, NZTA – “to improve system approaches, including approaches for more timely conversion post-Budget.”

Part of the problem was underspending.

“Crown capital expenditure underspend of $2.4 billion tells us that agencies may be forecasting too optimistically, such that it does not match their capacity to deliver on everything that has been funded.”

Sometimes the reason was a policy shift, such as that cut Kainga Ora spending, or timing as at NZTA.

But underspending was a big enough worry that bosses of the big-spending agencies had met “to address significant discrepancies between forecasted and actual capital investment spend”, followed up by the Secretary to the Treasury writing to them to improve forecasting, and to their ministers.

Ten projects entered the ‘pipeline’ for planning in the quarter, including private provision of hospital carparking.

The QIR showed some projects as of last September were hitting ructions and delays:

Three had not yet signed contracts though they were funded a long time ago:

  • Waikeria prison expansion phase 2, expected to sign a contract in quarter to March 2026
  • Specialised Rehabilitation Centre at Manukau Health Park, funded in Budget 2022, expected to sign in June 2026.
  • A third project was blanked out.

Fifty-three investments were reporting delays last September, five of them with over a $50m budget that were more than a year delayed.

Delays included:

  • Kainga Ora’s Northcote project
  • Manukau health park, delayed two years
  • Christchurch Hospital Tower 3 delayed by nearly two years, due October 2026
  • Nelson Hospital inpatient block delayed 18 months
  • Wairarapa rail Upgrades, delayed by 15 months, due for completion March 2027.

Three projects racked up red warning alerts in their first ‘Gateway’ reviews that are meant to keep them on track, signalling “major risks and issues” and triggering Treasury and ministerial intervention:

  • Police’s Arms Transformation Programme for implementing legislative changes and improvements to the administration of the Arms Regulatory system
  • MSD’s Disability Support Services – High and Complex Framework
  • Nelson Hospital Redevelopment.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

One decision that could cost women $200,000

Source: Radio New Zealand

The KiwiSaver gender gap narrowed from 17 percent in 2020 to 14 percent in 2025. File photo. RNZ / Hingyi Khong

Women are being told to take more risk with their KiwiSaver to help close the gap between their average balance and those of men.

Westpac said while the gender gap had narrowed from 17 percent in 2020 to 14 percent in 2025, men were contributing and saving more even though women live longer on average.

In the Westpac KiwiSaver funds, men had higher average balances in all age groups once people were over 18. The biggest gap was in the 30 to 39-year-old age group, where men had an average balance of $28,992 compared to $21,740 for women.

Westpac general manager of product, sustainability and marketing Sarah Hearn said part of the different was the gender pay gap and time out of the workforce. But women were also more likely to be in less risky funds.

Men had 37 percent of their total balances invested in growth and high-growth funds, compared to 32 percent for women, who hold more of their KiwiSaver in moderate or conservative funds.

Higher-risk funds should deliver higher returns over time.

Morningstar data shows that aggressive funds have returned an average 9.5 percent a year over 10 years compared to 4.2 percent for conservative.

Hearn said women taking a more defensive strategy early in life could miss out on tens of thousands of dollars over the decades.

Earlier, Westpac estimated that the gap in outcomes between someone in a conservative fund and someone in a growth fund over 30 years could be more than $225,000 for a median earner on a total 6 percent contribution.

“Historically women have made more conservative fund choices, but if they’re saving for the long term – at least 13 years – and are comfortable seeing larger up-and-down movements in their balance over time, I’d encourage them to consider what type of fund they’re in,” Hearn said.

She urged women to talk about their financial decisions. “We know men are really much more comfortable taking about numbers and money than women are… I think there’s a great opportunity where we could be talking more about our KiwiSaver balances, our returns, the types of funds we’re in and just having more conversations about money.”

She said people should check the type of KiwiSaver fund they were in and make sure it was right for them.

“Make sure it’s in line with your risk appetite and also the timeframe. I think that’s the most important thing. we know that balances can go up and down over time. There can be volatility, but this is the long haul. We’re all looking forward to retirement one day but in most cases it’s a couple of decades a way. It’s definitely the right time to take on a little bit more risk so that we can have our money working harder for us.”

Sign up for Money with Susan Edmunds, a weekly newsletter covering all the things that affect how we make, spend and invest money

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Person seriously hurt after being trapped between truck and skip in Wellington

Source: Radio New Zealand

RNZ / Marika Khabazi

A person has been seriously injured after getting trapped between a rubbish truck and what RNZ understands to be a skip bin in Wellington.

Emergency services were called to Maning Lane in the central city at 4.55am.

FENZ shift manager Jill Webley said crews extracted a trapped person and they were taken to hospital.

A police spokesperson said investigators would be in the area today working to determine what happened.

They said Worksafe had been advised.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Samoan teenager adopted in ‘coerced’ migration, tribunal told

Source: Radio New Zealand

ASamoan teenager was adopted by a New Zealand resident in a ‘coerced relocation’. Unsplash / RNZ composite

A tribunal has been told a Samoan teenager was adopted by a New Zealand resident in a ‘coerced relocation’ which led to violence and her baby being taken into care.

Immigration New Zealand (INZ) was trying to have her deported for not revealing she was in a relationship when she arrived in 2022.

Allegations of child abuse, a lack of welfare safeguards and unsafe adoptions from countries which are not signatories to Hague Convention protocols prompted a partial ban on international adoptions last September.

The immigration and protection tribunal had two cases involving adopted Samoans last year.

In the latest, the immigration and protection tribunal overturned the woman’s deportation, saying she was blameless as a then 18-year-old schoolgirl for the circumstances of her adoption and failing to tell INZ about her relationship.

“The tribunal notes that no allegations of trafficking have been made in this case, but that there have been cases where young people from Samoa have been adopted at a similar age to the appellant and trafficked to New Zealand using the Family (Dependent Child) residence category as a vehicle.

“The tribunal has heard evidence in a number of cases from these young people about the exploitation they have experienced at the hands of their “adoptive parents” in New Zealand, including being subjected to forced labour.”

The associate justice minister Nicole McKee announced in September a temporary ban on international adoptions from certain countries, and said she would introduce a bill this year to create a longterm solution.

The tribunal said that move meant the woman’s situation would not happen again.

“[She] did not know she was being adopted,” it said in its hearing notes. “To any reasonable observer, the appellant was not [her adoptive mother’s] “dependent child”. [She] was a stranger with no relationship to the appellant and her brothers.

“It is unfortunate that immigration policy at the time allowed for the appellant’s “adoption” and her coerced relocation to New Zealand. There were clearly welfare concerns in the setting she was placed, given the later involvement of Oranga Tamariki.”

The woman was six months pregnant when she arrived and had a caesarean birth, but fled the house when she was subject to violence, leaving her baby behind. Her brother had also been assaulted and she showed a phone video she had filmed of the attack to a social worker.

Oranga Tamariki took him into care and sometime later the woman’s daughter was put into foster care for about five months. Mother and child have since been reunited.

In an earlier tribunal decision from March last year, a man who was adopted as a teen described being ‘exploited and frightened by his adoptive parents who treated him like a slave’.

His aunt and uncle adopted him and forced him to work long hours in their factory. “His uncle beat him severely, on one occasion, breaking his arm. He did not receive wages for his

work and was only given $20 a week. He was not allowed a phone and could not maintain contact with his parents in Samoa.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Government ‘talking to everybody’ over Kiwis caught up in Middle East war – Peters

Source: Radio New Zealand

Foriegn Affairs Minister Winston Peters RNZ / Mark Papalii

Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters says there are thousands of New Zealanders whose plans have been disrupted by the current war between the US and Israel and Iran.

All sorts of contingencies to help them were being looked at but it was a complex situation, he told Morning Report.

SafeTravel said on Wednesday United Arab Emirates had partially reopened its air space.

There were limited flights operating from Dubai and Abu Dhabi.

Follow updates with RNZ’s blog

It said there had so far been no official announcement on flights to Australia or New Zealand, but the NZ government were in contact with airline representatives to get urgent confirmation on the status of flights.

Spain and the United Kingdom have announced they are organising evacuation flights for their citizens while Australia has opened an emergency portal for its citizens.

Asked on Morning Report about possible evacuation flights for Kiwis Peters said the situation was “difficult”.

“We’re saying to people if you can get out, and if you are concerned, get out. If you can’t, then try and stay safe or stay inside where you are or make sure you have places that are safe most of the time.”

There were thousands of Kiwis in the region with not a great number registered on SafeTravel, he said.

Last time there was conflict in the Middle East a plane was sent, and within an hour of it landing “peace broke out” and noone got on the flight, Peters said.

“We’ve got all sorts of contingencies ready now – all aspects have been looked at. Obviously I’ve got to be confidential but Foreign Affairs is doing a superb job to do the maximum they can to help New Zealanders there.”

Peters said New Zealand was “talking to everybody” regarding Kiwis stranded by the conflict.

Regarding the negotiations that had been going on in Switzerland just before the weekend attacks, Peters said they had been “protracted” and that was why countries such as New Zealand could see the possibility of conflict and advised citizens to leave.

“We were saying that a long time before this war broke out.”

Not concerned about upsetting US

In an earlier statement, the government said New Zealand had consistently condemned Iran’s nuclear programme and its “destabilising activities” in the region and “acknowledged” the strikes.

Peters said he wasn’t worried about blowback from the United States if New Zealand expressed any criticism over the joint attacks with Israel on Iran.

Critics were commenting as if the current war was from a 1980s or 1990s setting.

“Everything’s changed dramatically. …It’s the most uncertain world since the Second World War.”

Legal experts would decide but in some situations such as the US-Israel attacks it became “a reprisal or retaliation” and the genesis to the current conflict was the earlier actions of Iran.

People had to understand countries were dealing with a group of “religious fanatics” in Iran. Their Arabic neighbours didn’t support Iran because it had been supporting various forms of terrorism for decades.

Critics had “rushed to judgement” over the legality of the US-Israel attacks, however, they had no answers to the way Iran was acting.

While critics referred to rules-based order, Iran had not been observing this and it had been exporting “continual chaos overseas”.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Ardern on list as Ockham Book Awards finalists revealed

Source: Radio New Zealand

Former New Zealand Prime Minister Dame Jacinda Ardern’s book, A Different Kind of Power, has made the shortlist of the 2026 Ockham New Zealand Book Awards.

Ardern’s memoir is one of four finalists announced on Wednesday in the awards’ general non-fiction category.

The Ockham Awards shortlist includes writers across fiction, poetry, history, botany, art and te ao Māori.

Natural history writer Naomi Arnold is a finalist for her book, Northbound: Four Seasons of Solitude on Te Araroa.

Naomi Arnold

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

AI has powerful uses for First Nations oral cultural knowledge. Here’s how

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Elizabeth Vaughan, Rock Art Australia Kimberley Research Fellow, The University of Western Australia

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised this article contains names and images of people who have died.


Much of the conversation about artificial intelligence (AI) and Indigenous peoples focuses on harms, such as cultural appropriation, cultural flattening and digital exclusion. These risks are real.

But behind them sits an assumption that rarely gets challenged: because Aboriginal cultures are ancient, they must be static. Rooted firmly in the past, to stay there. That they cannot adapt to something as disruptive as generative AI.

This misreads tens of thousands of years of history. And it misses something our work with Traditional Owners in the Kimberley in Western Australia has made increasingly clear: Indigenous cultures are not only capable of adapting to AI – the way they have always held and transmitted knowledge may make them natural users of it.

‘Say it properly’

When I (Liz) first began working with Wororra people in the Kimberley, the late Janet Oobagooma taught me Wororra words. A senior cultural Elder for the Dambimangari community, she was exacting. When I got tongue-tied, she would growl at me: “If you’re gonna talk, say it properly”.

That strictness is structural, not personal. Wororra is an oral language. There is no written form to fall back on.

All societal laws, historical records, kinship information and cultural practices accumulated over millennia must be held in living memory – encoded across an entire population in songs, mythology, art, dance and ceremony. Nothing is filed in a single place. Everything is distributed, collectively maintained, and must be practised to survive.

This is fundamentally different from Western text-based, institutionalised knowledge systems.

And it raises a practical question: if oral knowledge was never meant to be read off a page, are libraries and archives really the best way to return it to the communities it belongs to?

Locked away in archives

The renowned Wororra lawman Sam Woolagoodja – co-author Francis Woolagoodja’s grandfather – worked with anthropologists, filmmakers and linguists over decades. Among them were missionary linguist Howard Coate, filmmaker Michael Edols, and bush adventurer Malcolm Douglas, who filmed Sam repainting Wandjina rock art at Raft Point.

Malcolm Douglas’s film ‘Beyond the Kimberley Coast’ featuring Sam Woolagoodja in 1976.

Over more than 40 years Sam shared cultural knowledge with these researchers. The recordings, field notes and translations captured during this period contribute some of the most detailed documentation of Wororra culture in existence.

Today, this material sits in institutions across the country, thousands of kilometres from the communities it belongs to.

This isn’t only a matter of preservation. For Aboriginal corporations managing Country, this data informs modern governance. Genealogies determine who speaks for Country. Heritage records shape native title decisions – as traditional owners have said to each other in management forums: “people are making up their own story about us”.

What AI made possible

Working with Sam’s descendants, we set out to gather his legacy of archived cultural material and explore ways to return it to community.

We began using a generative AI tool – Claude, made by Anthropic – to assist in making sense of data provided to Howard Coate by Sam.

We used it for deciphering difficult handwriting in decades-old field notebooks, cross referencing genealogies across multiple sources, and organising hundreds of extracted PDF scans into usable files. Work that normally takes months could be completed in hours.

Howard Coate’s notebook that records the walk with Sam Woolagoodja to Doubtful Bay. Author provided

But the real shift came when we began directing the AI to work only within a defined set of curated sources – published research, verified archival material, community-approved records – rather than drawing from the open internet.

Within that controlled environment, we could ask questions about Wororra culture in plain language and receive grounded answers drawn only from material we trusted.

It became a way of learning through dialogue rather than reading dense academic text. For those of us working to understand a culture’s depth from scattered published sources, it accelerated learning dramatically.

This experience gave us an idea. If a curated AI environment could help researchers engage with cultural knowledge through conversation, could a purpose-built system do the same for community members – especially younger generations living in town, away from Country?

Howard Coate and Sam Woolagoodja pictured together in 1936 or 1937. Photo courtesy of the State Library of Western Australia, from the Ron and Margaret Ross collection of photographs of the Derby Leprosaurium, Kunmunya, Munja and Wotjulum (BA3502/1/22)

The limitations of AI

General-purpose AI still has serious limitations. It has no understanding of cultural protocols or Indigenous data sovereignty, no concept of restricted knowledge governed by gender, age or ceremonial authority.

It can present errors with complete confidence, mixing up sources, misattributing cultural information, or presenting guesswork as fact. In heritage work, accuracy is not optional.

So we are developing a purpose-built concept. A closed-system AI governed by the community, where sources are verified, culturally appropriate and collectively endorsed.

The intent is not to replace oral tradition but to give communities a way to interact with their heritage through dialogue using AI. That’s closer to how this knowledge was always meant to be used than any library shelf or academic paper.

Janet Oobagooma and the Elders who contributed to the Dambimangari community’s published history, Barddabardda Wodjenangorddee (“we are telling all of you”), always emphasised that culture is not a museum exhibit.

It is alive, it adapts, and it demands to be spoken. AI is just the latest tool that could help make that happen – if communities are the ones holding it.

ref. AI has powerful uses for First Nations oral cultural knowledge. Here’s how – https://theconversation.com/ai-has-powerful-uses-for-first-nations-oral-cultural-knowledge-heres-how-276043

How to live a long and healthy life, according to the ancients

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Konstantine Panegyres, Lecturer in Classics and Ancient History, The University of Western Australia

Just like in the modern world, people in ancient times wanted to know how to live a long and healthy life.

Greeks and Romans heard fantastic tales of far-away peoples living to well beyond 100.

Greek essayist Lucian (about 120–180 CE) writes:

Indeed, there are even whole nations that are very long-lived, like the Seres [Chinese], who are said to live 300 years: some attribute their old age to the climate, others to the soil and still others to their diet, for they say that this entire nation drinks nothing but water. The people of Athos are also said to live 130 years, and it is reported that the Chaldeans live more than 100, using barley bread to preserve the sharpness of their eyesight.

Portrait of Lucian of Samosata

Greek essayist Lucian had lots to say about how to live a long and healthy life, as did ancient doctors. Library of Congress, Washington DC/Wikimedia

Whatever the truth of these tales, many ancient Greeks and Romans wanted a long and healthy life.

This is how they thought this could happen.

An ancient doctor’s perspective

Ancient doctors were interested in what people who lived long lives were doing every day and how this might have helped.

The Greek physician Galen (129–216 CE), for example, discusses two people he knew personally in Rome who lived to old age.

First, there is a grammarian (someone who studies and teaches grammar) called Telephus, who lived to almost 100.

According to Galen, Telephus ate just three times a day. His diet was simple:

gruel boiled in water mixed with raw honey of the best quality, and this alone was enough for him at the first meal. He also dined at the seventh hour or a little sooner, taking vegetables first and next tasting fish or birds. In the evening, he used to eat only bread, moistened in wine that had been mixed.

Galen also tells us Telephus had some bathing habits that might seem unusual to us today. Telephus preferred to be massaged with olive oil every day and only have a bath a few times a month:

He was in the habit of bathing twice a month in winter and four times a month in summer. In the seasons between these, he bathed three times a month. On the days he didn’t bathe, he was anointed around the third hour with a brief massage.

Second, there was an old doctor named Antiochus, who lived into his 80s.

According to Galen, Antiochus also had a simple diet.

In the morning, Antiochus usually ate toasted bread with honey. Then, at lunch, he would eat fish, but usually only fish “from around the rocks and those from the deep sea”. For dinner, he would eat “either gruel with oxymel [a mix of vinegar and honey] or a bird with a simple sauce”.

Alongside this simple diet, Antiochus went for a walk every morning. He also liked to be driven in a chariot, or had his slaves carry him in a chair around the city.

Galen also said Antiochus “performed the exercises suitable for an old man”:

There is one thing you should do for old people in the early morning as an exercise: after massage with oil, next get them to walk about and carry out passive exercises without becoming fatigued, taking into account the capacity of the old person.

Galen concludes that Antiochus’ routine probably contributed to his good health well into advanced age:

Looking after himself in old age in this way, Antiochus continued on until the very end, unimpaired in his senses and sound in all his limbs.

Galen stresses that Telephus and Antiochus had some obvious things in common. They ate just a few times a day; their diet was of wild meats, whole grains, bread and honey; and they kept active every day.

Depiction of eye examination, Roman copy of Greek original

An eye exam is under way. But there was more to staying healthy in ancient times. Rabax63/Wikimedia, CC BY-SA

What can you do?

Not all of us can live to 100 or more, as the Greeks and Romans were well aware.

However, Lucian offers us some consolation in his essay On Octogenarians:

On every soil and in every climate people who observe the proper exercise and the diet most suitable for health have been long-lived.

Lucian advised that we should imitate the lifestyles of people who have lived long and healthy lives if we want to do the same.

So, if you lived in Rome in the 2nd century CE, people like Telephus and Antiochus, who had a simple diet and kept active all their lives, would be good role models.

ref. How to live a long and healthy life, according to the ancients – https://theconversation.com/how-to-live-a-long-and-healthy-life-according-to-the-ancients-274975

‘Silky’ doesn’t mean it’s made from silk – how confusing textile language can harm the environment

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rebecca Van Amber, Senior Lecturer in Fashion & Textiles, RMIT University

If you care about sustainability, buying something as simple as a pillowcase can feel surprisingly hard.

Search for “sustainable sheets” and you’re flooded with familiar and tantalising promises: silky, bamboo, vegan, antimicrobial, breathable, organic. The language sounds reassuringly scientific and ethical, suggesting comfort, health, and environmental responsibility all wrapped up in one product.

The problem is that, in textiles, these words rarely mean what consumers think they mean.

The fashion industry is full of greenwashing, with brands using language to manipulate consumers.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission’s 2023 sweep into greenwashing claims identified textiles, garments and shoes as one of the most problematic sectors.

As textile researchers, we spend a lot of time unpacking product descriptions that look authoritative but often conflate different fabric components (fibre, yarn, fabric construction and finishes) into a single performance or marketing claim.

In one recent example, it took us more than 20 minutes to decode what was being sold as a “regenerated silk” fibre.

If two textile academics struggle to decipher a product description, the problem isn’t consumer literacy. It’s the way the information is being presented.

The case of the ‘silky’ pillowcase

Silky pillowcases have been heavily marketed as wellness products that will reduce wrinkles, prevent acne, and keep hair smooth and tangle-free. The promise is that a simple switch can quietly improve your life while you sleep.

In functional terms, there is some truth here. Smooth, “silky” fabrics like satin exhibit properties that are beneficial for skin and hair.

But “silky” isn’t a fibre at all.

Silk is the only naturally occurring filament fibre (meaning it is long and continuous), and most commercial silk comes from the Bombyx mori caterpillar.

Other common filament fibres are polyester and rayon (also known as viscose, which is often marketed and sold as bamboo), which are manufactured by extruding liquid polymers through spinnerets and solidifying them into long, continuous fibres.

When filament fibres are spun into yarns and woven in a satin structure, the resulting fabric is incredibly smooth.

The promises of wrinkle reduction and curl preservation being sold as features of a silky pillowcase cannot be completely attributed to a specific natural fibre’s biology. These claims are just as much as result of simply weaving smooth filament fibres into a satin weave – thus there is the exact same mechanism at work in polyester satin pillowcases that make no sustainability claims at all.

For example, bamboo is often presented as the sustainable middle ground between silk (often prohibitively expensive) and polyester (plastic) as bamboo is plant-based, fast-growing, and natural.

To make bamboo feel silky, the plant material is dissolved and extruded into viscose, a regenerated fibre, a process that strips away the original fibre structure entirely, along with many of its associated properties, such as being antimicrobial.

Conventional viscose/rayon production involves dissolving wood, bamboo or other cellulose using carbon disulfide, a chemical with health hazards, especially for exposed workers.

And while rayon is often marketed as “sustainable” because it comes from renewable resources such as trees and bamboo, old-growth forests are still often harvested to produce it.

‘Silkiness’ is vastly different to silk

At this point, the confusion isn’t just understandable — it’s structural.

Consumers are being asked to make complex ethical and sustainability judgements using language that collapses fibre, yarn type and fabric construction into a single sensory promise.

In other words, “silkiness” arises from a combination of fibre type, yarn and fabric construction, rather than whether a fibre is natural or synthetic.

This is why three very different fibres – silk, polyester and rayon – can all be turned into satin pillowcases that may feel remarkably similar, while carrying completely different environmental, ethical and end-of-life consequences.

Polyester comes from petrochemicals and releases plastic microfibres every time it’s washed. And unless rayon comes from a certified source, there’s a risk old-growth forests were harvested for the wood pulp feedstock.

By focusing on how a fabric feels, brands can imply a product inherits the cultural value of silk – luxury, smoothness, naturalness – even when the fibre itself is fossil-fuel derived or heavily chemically processed.

5 questions to ask

When assessing a sustainability claim in clothing or textiles, consumers can start with simple questions, such as:

1. What’s being highlighted and what’s being left out? Marketing often draws attention to a single fibre, plant or property while avoiding details about blends, chemical processing or finishes.

2. Where does the advertised claim come from? Is it from the fibre itself, the yarn, the fabric construction, or a surface treatment? Comfort words like “silky” or “breathable” can come from any of these.

3. Are scientific terms being used precisely or suggestively? Words like antimicrobial, organic, biodegradable and regenerated sound technical, but in clothing they’re often undefined, loosely applied and rarely backed by scientific testing.

4. What design choices shape end-of-life? Small amounts of blended fibres or elastane can prevent composting or recycling entirely, regardless of how sustainable the product claims to be.

5. What isn’t visible on the label? Finishes, coatings, sewing threads, dyes and trims are rarely disclosed, yet they materially affect durability and disposal.

Time for change

In Europe, a digital product passport on all items from 2027 will require companies to disclose not only fibre type, but also chemicals and processes used in production.

To protect consumers, it’s time Australia followed suit.

ref. ‘Silky’ doesn’t mean it’s made from silk – how confusing textile language can harm the environment – https://theconversation.com/silky-doesnt-mean-its-made-from-silk-how-confusing-textile-language-can-harm-the-environment-271406

Why doesn’t travel insurance cover war?

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Paul Latimer, Adjunct Professor, School of Law, Swinburne University of Technology

You might think it was exactly the kind of scenario you’d buy travel insurance for in the first place. A major, unforeseen international event causes travel chaos.

Flights are grounded around the world, leaving you and thousands of other travellers stranded with their travel plans in disarray. The knock-on effects lead to cancelled hotels, hire cars, work events, tour bookings and more.

That’s where the world found itself this week, as major conflict between the United States, Israel and Iran broke out in the Middle East.

But some people were caught off-guard, as they discovered cover for any impacts of war was explicitly written out of their insurance policies.

One might argue everyone needs to read the fine print. But it’s also been a long time since Australian travellers have had to grapple with a large-scale conflict affecting an entire region.

For the thousands of Australians currently stranded in or unable to travel through the Middle East, it’s almost impossible to predict how long this conflict and disruption will last.

So, are these exclusions fair? And for impacted travellers – are there any other options for support?


Read more: Booked to travel through the Middle East? Here’s why you shouldn’t cancel your flight


The costs of the unknown

Insurance is there to cover you against the unknown. It works by transferring risks and spreading losses.

Instead of an individual having to bear the devastating cost of something going wrong alone, they pay money (premiums) into a pool, along with many other people who face similar risks.

Insurance companies are happy to take on this risk, because they’ve carefully estimated how many people will actually make a claim, and how much they’ll need to pay them, versus those who’ll pay for cover but will statistically probably never need it.

In short, people take out insurance because they bet they’ll need it. Insurers sell it, because they bet enough people won’t.

What’s in the fine print

Despite this, almost all insurance policies have explicit exclusions: things written into the contract that the policy won’t cover.

It is very common for insurance contracts to exclude claims caused by war.

But with the travel plans of thousands thrown into disarray this week, many now possibly forced to foot the bill, there’s a broader question of fairness.

Smoke seen rising near Dubai International Airport following an Iranian strike.

Smoke seen rising near Dubai International Airport following an Iranian strike on Sunday. Altaf Qadri/AP

What makes a fair contract?

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Act defines contract terms as “unfair” if they:

  • cause a significant imbalance in the rights and obligations of the parties under the contract
  • are not reasonably necessary to protect the legitimate interests of the party who gets an advantage from the term, and
  • would cause financial or other harm to the other party if enforced.

For example, a contract may be unfair if one party can avoid or limit their responsibility, but the other cannot.

A further consideration is whether the conduct of a company could be unconscionable. This is defined as exploiting a consumer’s “special disadvantage” for financial gain.

Are these exclusion clauses fair?

Do travel insurance cover exclusions due to “war” fit the definition of an unfair contract term?

One could argue your insurance company can certainly avoid or limit its liability to pay out your claim, while you cannot.

There are also complex questions around how you actually define terms such as “war” and whether the current conflict in the Middle East qualifies as one.

Until 2021, insurance contracts for consumers were carved out of a key consumer protection under the ASIC Act – the “unfair contract terms” law.

Now, however, these contracts are covered under the ASIC Act. This means a court or tribunal could rule a particular contract term in an insurance contract is “unfair”, voiding it in the contract.

However, those impacted by the current travel chaos may be clutching at straws if they are hoping for any relief via this avenue.

Most policies are bought under “standard form contracts”, meaning they are prepared by one party (the insurer) and not subject to negotiation by the other (the customer). Exclusions for war and conflict are well established and highly standard across the industry.

It’s worth noting that if the chaos is prolonged and has severe impacts, we could see class actions emerge on this issue.

Think carefully before cancelling your flight

If your travel plans have been impacted by the conflict in the Middle East and you’re worried your insurance won’t cover you, there are still some steps you can take.

First, if you are booked to travel through the region, do not cancel your flight without consulting your airline.

Many airlines are already implementing their own refund and rebooking schemes, and cancelling independently could limit or void your access to compensation under Australian Consumer Law.

Other steps you can take

If you have questions about what is or isn’t covered in a particular policy, contact your insurer.

Consider seeking independent legal advice if you have concerns. Community legal services can often provide general advice for free.

To lodge a formal complaint about any financial product, contact the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) on 1800 931 678 or via their website. AFCA will make a decision to uphold or reject a consumer’s claim.

Alternatively, you can contact the relevant small claims tribunal in your state or territory.

The Australian government’s Smartraveller website provides up-to-date travel advice for Australians.

ref. Why doesn’t travel insurance cover war? – https://theconversation.com/why-doesnt-travel-insurance-cover-war-277363

Auckland mayor objects to ‘expensive’ housing plan request

Source: Radio New Zealand

Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown. RNZ/Marika Khabazi

Auckland Council has less than two weeks to respond to a letter from the government wanting the council to outline its plan for housing intensification.

But mayor Wayne Brown says the council is already spending millions on the project and the request is too costly.

In February, Minister for Housing and RMA Reform Chris Bishop announced that Cabinet agreed to reduce the city’s minimum housing capacity requirement from 2.08 million to 1.6 million.

In a letter to Brown dated 24 February, Bishop asked for an outline of the approach the mayor intended to take to review the plan, and of what areas or suburbs may be affected by the change.

Brown refused. “We’ve spent $10 million on Plan Change 78, and by Christmas we’d blown another $3 million on Plan Change 120, as well as having 50 staff reading 10,000 submissions… so this is expensive,” he told a planning committee meeting on Tuesday.

“Preparing maps requires investing significant time and money. It’s not as simple as pushing a button. In this organisation you’re lucky to get a lift by pushing a button. We’ll be telling the government what Aucklanders want, not the other way around.

“What’s important is for Auckland to lead the process from here, not producing maps to see if some ministers worried about their jobs might like them.”

A spokesperson from Chris Bishop’s office later clarified to RNZ that the minister had never asked Brown for a map.

Brown was adament that Auckland Council would not invest any more resources.

“I’m reluctant to commission a hell of a lot of expenditure, which may not meet an unknown criteria from an unknown number of Cabinet Ministers. Most of them don’t live in Auckland.

“That’s just stupid. I’m not going to do that. I’m the mayor of Auckland. If they want to be the mayor of Auckland, have a crack at me.”

Bishop asked Brown to respond to the letter by 17 March.

Councillor Shane Henderson agrees with the mayor’s approach saying the council should not provide an outline until feedback from the public had been considered, and accused the government of “political desperation in an election year”.

Councillor Sarah Paterson-Hamlin was concerned Aucklanders would have to be consulted again.

“I’m really conscious that we asked a lot of Aucklanders,” she said.

“We asked them for feedback on a really complicated thing over Christmas and they came to the party, 10,000 submissions is a lot for a process like that. I don’t know how we can go back out in good faith, and how we communicate to those 10,000-plus people that they will be heard.”

However, deputy mayor Desley Simpson did not understand why it would be too difficult.

“Respectfully it does seem pretty obvious, for me, for a layman, surely if you just up-zoned along the major transport corridors and around the stations added the city centre you’d get a number.

“Why can’t you just tell us straight away what those suburbs would look like going up and the suburbs that would look like going down? That seems like, from a layman, quite a logical thing to ask.”

Auckland Council chief of strategy Megan Tyler responded that it would be too time-consuming.

“It’s not simple. If it was a button, I would happily show you the button. You can press the button yourself. There isn’t one.”

Auckland Council will meet again on 10 March, where Bishop’s letter will be on the agenda.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Dog attacks keep happening in NZ. Why hasn’t the law kept up?

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Marcelo Rodriguez Ferrere, Associate Professor of Law, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau

In February of this year, the media in New Zealand both captivated and horrified the public with sensational stories of dog attacks.

That line could have been written last week. It wasn’t. It appeared in an article in the New Zealand Law Journal more than two decades ago.

The recent attacks that led to the death of a woman in Northland and left a father and son critically injured in Christchurch have once again forced dog control into the national conversation. But the sense of déjà vu is hard to ignore.

Writing in that article back in 2003, legal scholar Jill Jones was responding to a similar spate of attacks and the government’s proposed amendments to the Dog Control Act 1996.

Those changes were touted at the time as “significant and comprehensive”. In reality, they focused narrowly on banning the importation of particular breeds and introducing new classifications of “menacing” dogs.

The legislation was enacted within months, despite concerns it would do little to reduce attacks and risked becoming kneejerk lawmaking: a response to moral panic rather than to the underlying causes of the problem.

Reform in name, not in effect

Ultimately, the concerns were well founded. The legislation did little to solve the problem of dog attacks. In fact, a 2022 study published in the New Zealand Medical Journal showed that the problem has got steadily worse.

Those researchers identified “a nearly eight-fold increase in the risk of hospitalisation from a dog bite injury compared to forty years ago, with an incidence of 1.7 per 100,000 in 1979 rising to 13.4 per 100,000 in 2018/19”.

They also note that “this increase has come about despite regional attempts by each territorial authority at addressing this worsening problem”.

Thus, stories with sensational headlines such as “Deadly surge: Councils warn more deaths likely under weak dog laws” need to be read in context.

Despite the recent interest by news media – and the moral panic it might provoke – the awful attacks that occurred earlier this year are not out of the norm: this is a persistent issue. The public’s worry and its demands to address the problem are also entirely justifiable.

Soothing that worry will require much more emotional responses from politicians calling the owners of dogs who attack “feral” and “degenerate” and calling for stricter punishments.

Local Government Minister Simon Watts, who is in charge of the issue, has stated that “overhauling the Dog Control Act is not something that we have capacity for this term”. That raises the prospect that any short-term action will once again take the form of piecemeal, regional and ultimately ineffective responses.

Already, some local authorities have begun reviewing their bylaws in response to the media focus and public concern it has generated. However, no efforts are underway to develop a national solution.

From punishment to prevention

If the government is serious about reducing dog attacks, it would need to engage with expert advice and consider major reform.

The Dog Control Act turns 30 this year. While it has been amended over time, its core structure remains largely unchanged. Experts have long questioned its effectiveness and whether its decentralised design – which delegates the responsibility for dog control to local authorities – is still fit for purpose in addressing today’s patterns of dog ownership and harm.

This is one reason why the SPCA last week wrote an open letter to parliament calling for, among other things, a “comprehensive overhaul” of the act that would “replace outdated breed-specific provisions with evidence-based, nationally consistent risk management tools focused on individual dog behaviour and responsible ownership”.

Current legislation requires all councils to have the basics – such as a registration system and dog control officers – but leaves the details of implementing dog control policy to each individual council.

This explains the extreme regional variation in fees, educational programmes and enforcement. The 2022 study found a “seven-fold difference in the incidence of dog bites between territorial authorities with the highest and lowest rates of dog-bite injury”.

Another report found Invercargill has five times the number of prosecutions compared to Wellington, despite similar levels of registered dogs and reported attacks.

With an estimated 830,000 dogs in New Zealand, many people have important relationships with them, whether they be companions or colleagues.

There is a need for thoughtful, evidence-based policymaking that reflects the place of dogs in society and the nature of human–dog relationships. It should also consider which regulatory systems – including overseas models – have been shown to reduce harm.

Addressing the issue effectively requires national coordination and long-term planning, rather than inconsistent regional responses or short-term measures aimed primarily at easing political pressure. Any reform should focus on preventing attacks, not simply responding to them after the fact.

Progress on that work is overdue, given the harm experienced by victims and the broader responsibility to ensure safe and responsible dog ownership.

ref. Dog attacks keep happening in NZ. Why hasn’t the law kept up? – https://theconversation.com/dog-attacks-keep-happening-in-nz-why-hasnt-the-law-kept-up-276737

Live: Israel’s army ordered to seize territory in Lebanon, Trump vows to ‘cut off all trade’ with Spain over Iran

Source: Radio New Zealand

Follow the latest with our live blog above

Fresh strikes have hit half a dozen countries across the Middle East in the widening conflict surrounding Iran.

The latest blasts were reported in Iran, Israel, Lebanon, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, as Israel urged countries to cut ties with Iran.

Israel said its air force had launched a new “large scale” wave of strikes “targeting the Iranian terror regime’s infrastructure in Tehran”, following the latest salvo of missiles fired from Iran, including in Tel Aviv and in several sites in central Israel.

Iran, in turn, appealed to the UN Security Council to step in, while warning of more intense attacks on US forces and Israel as the war raged for the fourth day.

Iranian drones struck the US embassy in Saudi Arabia after previously hitting the mission in Kuwait.

In Lebanon, air strikes hit Beirut’s southern suburbs, an area where Hezbollah holds sway, while Hezbollah said it had targeted a military facility in Israel in response.

Israel ordered its forces to take control of more positions inside Lebanon to create a buffer zone, and the Lebanese army pulled back some of its forces.

Explosions were also heard in the Bahraini and Qatari capitals of Manama and Doha.

The International Atomic Energy Agency said a key Iranian nuclear site, Natanz, was damaged, but “no radiological consequence” was expected.

The UN refugee agency said the escalation of hostilities has displaced at least 30,000 people in Lebanon, and the Iranian Red Crescent said more than 780 people have been killed nationwide.

Follow the latest with our live blog at the top of this page.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Dozens of Auckland homes compulsorily bought by council for flood relief plan

Source: Radio New Zealand

Close to 50 homes in an Auckland suburb are being compulsorily bought to make way for new flood plains and uncover a buried stream.

This is in Rānui, where some homeowners are relieved to get out, while others wish they could stay.

It’s just the start of Auckland Council’s plan to reduce the risk in flood-prone areas of the region and it says there are more property acquisitions ahead.

Emily Stewart is one of those affected. RNZ / Marika Khabazi

Emily Stewart, her husband and two children moved out of their house in Rānui’s Clover Drive a few weeks ago.

It’s been bought under the Public Works Act because a piped stream is being uncovered.

“The stream is going to come through approximately through here…right through our house.”

On Sunday, the home was relocated to Waikato.

default RNZ / Marika Khabazi

Stewart said they planned to sell the house three years ago before the storms hit – some of her neighbours had to kayak from their houses.

The Stewarts weren’t eligible for a risky-home buyout, so had repairs done, then learned their house would be acquired to daylight a stream and create a flood plain.

The family has bought and moved to another part of the city.

“It’s bittersweet because for three years we were just stuck in this limbo. Back in October all of the houses in this cresent were still standing in various states of decay,” Stewart said.

Close to 50 homes in an Auckland suburb are being compulsorily bought to make way for new flood plains and uncover a buried stream. RNZ / Marika Khabazi

‘We need this land’ – council

Auckland Council’s head of sustainable partnerships Tom Mansell said of the almost 50 homes required for flood plains in Rānui, half were state owned.

“Some of these properties, most of them have been flooded, some of them have been partially flooded, some of them haven’t been flooded but we need this land to save other surrounding properties from flooding.”

He said it would save 100 properties and also enable future development.

The Rānui Making Space for Water project is costing $85 million, of which most – close to $50m – is for buying properties.

“It’s digging up the pipe, creating the flood plain, creating the stream, upgrading Don Buck Road bridge,” Mansell said.

“It’s transforming communities, it is disruptive, it is costly but moving forward with climate change and increased rainfall it is a new era in managing stormwater.”

RNZ / Marika Khabazi

Mansell said negotiating with homeowners was a sensitive process.

“Some homeowners are relieved it is a way out, a fresh start for them and some not so much, it’s really quite hard hitting. Some of them have been there 30 to 40 years and it’s their home, there’s a reluctance to leave.”

He said there will be more homes acquired to make way for flood plains in coming years as the council confirms other projects.

“Overall, it creates more greenspace, creates resilient communities and it’s the way of the future for managing stormwater.”

Clover Drive in Henderson in Auckland. RNZ / Marika Khabazi

Reluctant to leave

Another Clover Drive homeowner, Wayne Macdonald, didn’t want to leave but accepted a Public Works Act buyout.

“I was hoping to stay,” he said.

“I was disappointed, I like my house. I like its location, I like how it’s close to everything and I didn’t really look forward to looking for a new house and I’m struggling to find something.”

He was aware the acquisition was compulsory and said the financial incentives for accepting a buyout within certain timeframes made it more attractive.

The Momutu Stream. RNZ / Marika Khabazi

Macdonald said the plans to create a bigger stream and flood plain included walking paths and reserve areas.

“What they’re doing is actually really nice and for a lot of neighbourhoods around, it’s going to give them options. They’re going to be able to walk away from the streets and pollution of the cars, kids are going to have areas to go play.”

Further along the road, Donna Mather’s home is not in a flood zone.

There are already many vacant plots from houses that were too risky to live in and she said having more homes go with compulsory acquisitions will change the neighbourhood.

“A lady friend up on Universal Drive, she will be moving because she was bought out. Apparently her place is going to be a pond.”

Donna Mather RNZ / Marika Khabazi

Under the Public Works Act, councils or agencies buying properties can only inform property owners – not tenants.

Stewart said this created problems on her street, because some neighbours were only recently informed by their landlords who have to give 90 days notice to end a tenancy.

“They were completely rug-pulled, like what’s going on, what’s happening I’m getting conflicting information.”

She said that needed to change.

“What I’m seeing is that we are prioritising homeowners over people who are renting and that’s not how this society should be supporting each other,” Stewart said.

“The fact that I’ve been told that they are having to look at work-arounds means there’s something wrong with the law. There is an oversight with the laws that they are bound by,” she said.

“The way we can make change for the better for people is to say ‘this isn’t working’.”

RNZ / Marika Khabazi

Mansell said the council strongly encouraged landlords to inform tenants if their house was being bought out – and tenants have access to financial support during the process.

“We encourage them strongly to talk to their tenants and we have a community advisory group which meets every two weeks…so we try and keep as much information about what we’re doing, the overall layout of the project is out in the community,” Mansell said.

“That’s one way the information gets out but unfortunately we cannot contact the tenants directly, we have to go through the landlord.”

The compulsory buyouts come as the region is under pressure to intensify housing and build more homes and the council was preparing plans to accommodate up to 2 million homes in coming decades.

However last month, Cabinet agreed to lower the maximum number of houses in Auckland from 2 million to at least 1.6 million.

Mansell said houses needed to be built in safe areas.

“The last thing we want to do is more development with houses in the wrong place in a danger zone so we are watching and working with this plan change. We don’t want to create more issues moving forward.”

RNZ / Marika Khabazi

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

The 5am myth: Waking early won’t make you more successful

Source: Radio New Zealand

At 5am, social media fills with proof that the early risers have already won the day. Cold plunges. Journals. Sunrise runs. Productivity gurus insist this is the routine that separates high performers from everyone else, reinforced by high-profile early risers such as Apple CEO Tim Cook, entrepreneur Richard Branson and Hollywood actor Jennifer Aniston.

The message is simple: wake earlier, perform better. But the science tells a more complicated story. For many people, a 5am routine clashes with their biology and can undermine both health and productivity. Much depends on your individual biological rhythm, or “chronotype”.

Chronotypes reflect when people naturally feel alert or sleepy, and genetics play a major role in shaping them. Research shows that sleep timing is partly rooted in our genes, and chronotype is heritable. Chronotype also shifts across the lifespan, with adolescents tending toward later sleep pattern and older adults often shifting earlier. Most people are not extreme larks or owls, but fall somewhere in between.

Jennifer Aniston loves an early start to the day.

SHAUN CURRY/AFP

Live: Israel launches fresh attacks on Iran and Beirut, Iran continues strikes across Gulf

Source: Radio New Zealand

Follow the latest with our live blog above

Fresh strikes have hit half a dozen countries across the Middle East in the widening conflict surrounding Iran.

The latest blasts were reported in Iran, Israel, Lebanon, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, as Israel urged countries to cut ties with Iran.

Israel said its air force had launched a new “large scale” wave of strikes “targeting the Iranian terror regime’s infrastructure in Tehran”, following the latest salvo of missiles fired from Iran, including in Tel Aviv and in several sites in central Israel.

Iran, in turn, appealed to the UN Security Council to step in, while warning of more intense attacks on US forces and Israel as the war raged for the fourth day.

Iranian drones struck the US embassy in Saudi Arabia after previously hitting the mission in Kuwait.

In Lebanon, air strikes hit Beirut’s southern suburbs, an area where Hezbollah holds sway, while Hezbollah said it had targeted a military facility in Israel in response.

Israel ordered its forces to take control of more positions inside Lebanon to create a buffer zone, and the Lebanese army pulled back some of its forces.

Explosions were also heard in the Bahraini and Qatari capitals of Manama and Doha.

The International Atomic Energy Agency said a key Iranian nuclear site, Natanz, was damaged, but “no radiological consequence” was expected.

The UN refugee agency said the escalation of hostilities has displaced at least 30,000 people in Lebanon, and the Iranian Red Crescent said more than 780 people have been killed nationwide.

Follow the latest with our live blog at the top of this page.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Rising Kiwi Ollie Dunbar pulls off major upset at NZ Squash Open

Source: Radio New Zealand

Ollie Dunbar in action against Velavan Senthilkumar at the New Zealand Squash Open. Professional Squash Association

New Zealand teenage wildcard Ollie Dunbar has caused a major boilover on the opening day of the New Zealand Squash Open in Christchurch, toppling a top-50 ranked opponent.

The 18-year-old stunned world No.49 Velavan Senthilkumar in five games at the Isaac Theatre Royal venue.

The world No.125 needed just over an hour to prevail 11-8, 11-6, 6-11, 2-11, 11-5, staving off a mid-game fightback from his Indian opponent.

It comes 12 months after recording his maiden World Events win – at the same tournament.

“It was nice to do it last year, there was a bit more pressure on me this time around. But I enjoy playing on this court, so I’m looking forward to another game on it tomorrow,” Dunbar said.

“Over the last year or so I’ve definitely got better at the mental side of my game. It was good to be able to come through after being 2-0 up and seeing him come back to force a fifth game.

“It’s an incredible court and stage here. I’m so happy to play on it whenever I can. It’s been great to have lots of my friends here and have some people from my club come down to watch me.”

Dunbar was to take on two-time world junior champion Mohamad Zakaria of Egypt in today’s second-round match.

Joelle King in action at the Nations Cup tournament in Tauranga. PHOTOSPORT

It was a tougher day for the New Zealand women, with Joelle King and Kaitlyn Watts both beaten in five games.

Former world No.3 and 11-time New Zealand champion King was making her return from injury, having last played on tour 10 months ago.

She went down 11-2, 7-11, 8-11, 11-7, 11-8 in 50 minutes to Canadian No.1 Hollie Naughton.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Green fuel needs a leg-up to be viable, modelling shows

Source: Radio New Zealand

Auckland University economic modelling has found green hydrogen could have some limited use in future. 123RF

There are calls for more support for green fuel alternatives as the Middle East conflict exposes New Zealand’s vulnerability to fuel supply chain shocks.

Auckland University economic modelling has found green hydrogen – hydrogen produced by renewables – could have some limited use in future for industries heavily reliant on gas and coal for production.

But cost and limited infrastucture remained major barriers, as did a lack of government policy.

“If we can use renewable electricity, wind, for example, or possibly geothermal as a source of electricity, then that is an attractive option,” Auckland University energy economist Professor Basil Sharp said.

“But until such time as the technology improves and we can get the costs down, it’s going to be somewhere out in the future.”

As the government pushes ahead with a liquified natural gas import facility and global LNG prices soared as a result of Qatar halting production, Sharp said more attention needed to be paid to New Zealand’s energy independence.

“There could be an unintended impact associated with promoting importation of LNG that could and I’m not saying it will, but it could have an impact on the rollout of our renewables.

“It could have an impact on the technology, such as the viability of green hydrogen going forward.”

Green hydrogen a bit player in road to net zero

The modelling found that at best, green hydrogen was capable of supplying about 12 percent of industrial process heat energy by 2050 .

Because it was so expensive to produce, green hydrogen needed the right conditions to be viable and was more attractive when carbon prices were higher, renewable electricity was cheaper, and hydrogen technology costs fell.

It was in those scenarios researchers said hydrogen could play a complementary role in helping New Zealand reach net zero emissions, but electrification was still the key.

“Even if they are making very small contributions to our energy independence when the technology and and the costs come down, we need to be in a position, to take advantage of that and actually promote the utilisation of hydrogen in the economy,” said Sharp.

A new export for NZ?

One of the model’s co-authors and senior economics lecturer Le Wen said New Zealand was already well-placed to produce green hydrogen because 80 percent of our electricity was renewable.

Wen said that if the country invested in and scaled up green hydrogen production, the country could become a leader in genuinely low-emissions hydrogen.

“It may not solve everything on its own, but it could give the country a strong new export opportunity,” he said.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Ministry underestimated scale of secondary teacher shortage

Source: Radio New Zealand

Secondary schools need more teachers in the system than previously thought. File photo. Richard Tindiller

The Education Ministry has been underestimating the scale of the secondary teacher shortage, and says correcting its calculations caused this year’s jump in the forecast shortage.

The ministry last week forecast a likely shortfall of 1220 secondary teachers this year and next, up from last year’s projection of 880 for the same period.

The ministry’s education workforce head Anna Welanyk told RNZ the change was because the ministry previously assumed schools hired in outside teachers to cover about half of the time when their regular teachers were out of their classrooms due to factors such as non-contact time.

Welanyk said research last year showed that was true for primary schools, but not for secondary schools which used relief teachers for almost all of their teachers’ non-contact hours.

“We went out and talked to the sector to find out more information about exactly whether or not those assumptions were valid and determined that for primary, they were bang on and for secondary, they really weren’t,” she said.

She said that meant secondary schools needed more teachers in the system than previously thought.

“Because we changed the assumption to reflect what we understand to be something closer to the real life scenario, it’s meant that we’ve had to add on an additional 580-odd additional teachers into the secondary space.

“It’s not that the situation’s got dramatically worse or that our forecasting was not where it needed to be. It’s more that more detail in terms of the research that we’ve done has pointed us in a slightly different direction.”

She confirmed that it also meant the ministry had under-estimated demand for secondary teachers in previous forecasts.

Welanyk said without the change the ministry would have forecast a shortage of 140 rather than 710 secondary teachers this year.

“The situation, as described by the data in the report, is a more accurate reflection of the pressure on the system.”

In 2023, the ministry under-estimated demand for primary teachers after failing to account for changes to their collective agreement.

Meanwhile, Welanyk said there were early signs that enrolments in initial teacher education programmes had increased 30 percent his year.

“It’s very promising. It’s the highest increase that we’ve seen in quite a while, since before covid. So what that tells us is that people are interested in teaching as a profession. They do see it as a viable career path,” she said.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

A gold mine, an Australia mining giant, and a community divided

Source: Radio New Zealand

A visual simulation released by Santana Minerals showing what the mine would look like from Māori Point Road, Tarras. Supplied

A proposed gold mine is on the fast-track list. Proponents says it will bring jobs and money to the region, but opponents say it will be an economic ‘short-term sugar hit … with long-term consequences’.

Plans for a large, open cast gold mine in Central Otago are pitting locals against each other, while a mining industry executive says New Zealanders are too negative and catastrophise projects they don’t understand.

Australian company Santana Minerals has applied for fast-track approval to build an open cast mine in the Dunstan mountain range, an hour’s drive east of Queenstown, after discovering what it calls the largest single gold deposit in New Zealand in more than four decades.

According to the documents submitted to the fast-track panel, Santana will build four open mine pits. The largest, Rise and Shine Open Pit will be one kilometre long, 800 metres wide and 200 metres deep. There will also be three shallower pits, a processing plant that is one kilometre long and 120 metres wide, and a tailing storage facility to store mineral waste dust.

It says the project will employ hundreds of people and be worth $6 billion in revenue and more than $1b in taxes and royalties for New Zealand.

The fast-track panel is set to decide by late October and, if approved, it will be the first new mine to get the go-ahead under the accelerated process.

Opponents fear it will destroy threatened plants, scar the unique landscape and pollute the land and water. They say New Zealand will not get all the economic benefits because Santana is an Australian company, and they warn it will open the door to more mining in the region.

Two main groups are campaigning against the mine with backing from famous residents including actor Sir Sam Neill and painter Sir Grahame Sydney, as well as the former prime minister Helen Clark.

One of the groups, Sustainable Tarras, has already been fighting plans to build an international airport near the town. It calls the Santana proposal ‘David versus Goliath’ and is asking for donations to fund experts to fully understand the economic, environmental and social impacts of the mine.

“We are fighting this hard,” it says on its website.

Artist Gregory O’Brien, who organised a fundraising exhibition for the group, says the “proposed desecration of a heritage area for purely monetary gain is an outrage to all of us, as it is to the citizens of Central Otago and to all New Zealanders”.

“Painters, photographers, writers, film-makers, choreographers and other arts practitioners from within Central Otago and further afield are incensed at the churlishness of both the mining consortium and the Government’s ruinous ‘fast-track’ (aka ‘Highway to Hell’) legislation.

“The environmental cost of such a cold-blooded, extractive exercise is simply too high, as is the social impact and down-stream legacy.”

On the other side, Santana Mine Supporters, a Facebook group with 6,800 members says Central Otago “deserves opportunity – higher-paid local jobs, stronger regional businesses, and meaningful investment back into our community. We also believe development must be done properly, with high standards, transparency, and long-term accountability.”

RNZ Central Otago reporter Katie Todd has spoken to many locals, including farmers who see it as a positive move for the region and a continuation of the area’s mining legacy.

She says the application has been drawn out.

“Santana Minerals were asking for it to be considered within 30 days or so and we’ve recently learnt it’s going to be more like 140 days.

“In part that’s because of iwi opposition. Kā Rūnaka, which is a collective of Otago hapū, has raised concerns about potential Treaty settlement breaches and their concerns were described by the panel convenor of the fast-track application as significant and immutable.

“So that’s going to be something to watch,” says Todd.

Matthew Sole of Central Otago Environmental Society says communities are divided over the mine.

“There’s a lot of tension in the community,” he says. “There are certainly a lot of people for it.

“It’s the comments you receive on social media when you try and put up a counter argument and the difficulty I find with it is it’s actually hard to have a conversation.”

Sole says many people are under financial pressure and are concerned about the country’s future.

“I take a wider, longer term view that we’ve got to move on from exploitation to economies that have a right relationship with our environment. I think we’ve got to change away from these extractive processes to more enduring relationships and regenerative relationships with the land.”

Sole has produced a YouTube video of the area that will be mined and points out unique, threatened plants and remnants of past mining endeavours that are part of its precious heritage that he says are at risk. He says the old mining era cannot be compared to today’s.

“We’re talking about two different things. The early mining was largely mining of individual endeavour and it was largely with human hands with the use of water,” he says.

The impact of modern mining is “devastating, it has lost its context and meaning because of the vast industrial scale by massive machinery. We’re not comparing like with like”.

In a story for Newsroom last week, Jill Herron wrote that nearly a million hectares across Otago, and another 100,000 in Southland, are now at various stages of being “pegged” by gold mining companies.

But chief executive of New Zealand Minerals Council, Josie Vidal, says people have no need to panic and “possibly none” of the areas that have been identified on a minerals map drawn up by Earth Sciences New Zealand will be mined.

Heightened interest in the area is driven by the record price of gold, she says. She believes many will be hobby gold miners and doubts there would be any other large mines like Santana that are at a serious stage.

“There’s a lot of interest in gold of the traditional gold mining areas of which Otago is one, and there’s quite a lot of interest from smaller prospectors who could do quite well out of getting a fairly small amount of gold because the price is so high.”

She calls the Santana proposal “a bog standard gold mine”.

“I’m mystified by the attention. It’s a gold mine like any other. There’s no reason for it not to proceed.”

When The Detail asked Santana for an interview, it replied in an email with a number of conditions.

On balance and representation it said, “Please confirm who else will be featured or interviewed, and whether local voices and businesses many of which support the project – not just high-profile critics – are being included to reflect the full spectrum of community sentiment”.

It later declined our interview request but referred us it its 9,400-page application.

In an email, it said it welcomes scrutiny.

“What we cannot support is the amplification of assertions that have already been addressed, in writing, in data, numerous interviews and expert reports – simply because they are emotive or convenient to repeat and you haven’t bothered to fact check their claims.

“If the program’s objective is balance and informed debate, then the technical evidence must sit alongside the sentiment.”

Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here.

You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

MediMap failings likely to be canvassed as part of Manage My Health review

Source: Radio New Zealand

MediMap’s failings will likely be covered by the review into Manage My Health. RNZ/Calvin Samuel

MediMap’s failings will likely be covered by the review into Manage My Health, despite the recent data breach not being included by name.

The prescription portal was now being brought back online, having been down since 22 February, after it was discovered patient information had been changed.

MediMap said it had “rebuilt a secure production environment, completed a forensic review and validation of our data, identified the specific demographic records that were altered, and strengthened authentication controls, supported by independent cyber security specialists”.

All user passwords would be reset and any medication changes made manually during the outage would require clinical review, it said.

It acknowledged the “patience and professionalism” of healthcare staff dealing with manual processes, and apologised to residents, patients, families and healthcare providers for any disruption and distress.

A court injunction had been granted which prohibited anyone from accessing, using, copying, sharing or publishing any of the data.

The MediMap breach followed a hack of the patient portal ManageMyHealth (MMH) in late December, which sparked a review, commissioned by Health Minister Simeon Brown, to be carried out by the Ministry of Health.

The minister’s office said while MediMap would not be explicitly included by name in the review currently underway, the systemic issues which led to it would likely apply to both.

“The Ministry of Health’s review into the Manage My Health (MMH) cyber security incident is considering the broader issue of how private companies secure health data,” a spokesperson said.

A Ministry of Health spokesperson said the aim of the review was to understand the causes of the MMH breach, and the response, and to recommend improvements to ensure data breaches were better prevented in the future.

“While our focus remains on Manage My Health, the learnings will apply more broadly to other digital platforms which manage heath data.”

MediMap has been approached for comment.

On Thursday last week, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said Cabinet had just signed off on a new cyber security policy and strategy.

“It’s entirely appropriate that we look at our whole settings, because we need to make sure we’ve got tougher cyber securities around our critical infrastructure.”

He also sent a strong message to businesses.

“The Kiwi laid-backness in a cyber security world where there are real risks and challenges is not good enough. You need to be investing, and making sure that your systems and your protocols are up to speed, and are actually on-point, and that they continually evolve.”

He said the government would be consulting on the problem over the next few months, and considering incentives and punishments.

Last week, Manage My Health began notifying a further group of patients affected by the December attack.

It did not respond to questions about why these people had not been notified earlier.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Live: Israel launches fresh strikes on Iran and Beirut

Source: Radio New Zealand

Follow the latest with our live blog above

Fresh strikes have hit half a dozen countries across the Middle East in the widening conflict surrounding Iran.

The latest blasts were reported in Iran, Israel, Lebanon, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, as Israel urged countries to cut ties with Iran.

Israel said its air force had launched a new “large scale” wave of strikes “targeting the Iranian terror regime’s infrastructure in Tehran”, following the latest salvo of missiles fired from Iran, including in Tel Aviv and in several sites in central Israel.

Iran, in turn, appealed to the UN Security Council to step in, while warning of more intense attacks on US forces and Israel as the war raged for the fourth day.

In Lebanon, air strikes hit Beirut’s southern suburbs, an area where Hezbollah holds sway, while Hezbollah said it had targeted a military facility in Israel in response.

Israel ordered its forces to take control of more positions inside Lebanon to create a buffer zone, and the Lebanese army pulled back some of its forces.

Explosions were also heard in the Bahraini and Qatari capitals of Manama and Doha.

The International Atomic Energy Agency said a key Iranian nuclear site, Natanz, was damaged, but “no radiological consequence” was expected.

The UN refugee agency said the escalation of hostilities has displaced at least 30,000 people in Lebanon, and the Iranian Red Crescent said more than 780 people have been killed nationwide.

Follow the latest with our live blog at the top of this page.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

In pictures: Only lunar eclipse of 2026 graces NZ skies

Source: Radio New Zealand

The elipse at its max, taken from Wai-iti Dark Sky Park in Tasman. Supplied / Brent

Budding astronomers and photographers have ditched sleep overnight to lay eyes on a total lunar eclipse over New Zealand – from what one expert says is the “best seat in the world”.

The only lunar eclipse of 2026, also known as a blood moon, began just before 10pm on Tuesday.

Stardome astronomer Josh Aoraki earlier told RNZ lunar eclipses were not rare per se – the rarity was whether or not it was visible from your location.

“For this one in particular, we really have the best seat in the world, really. It’s really only visible for its entirety over the Pacific. And it’s the only one that we’re going to see this year. I don’t think we have another until 2028, about two years.”

Missed out? Never fear, there are other astronomical phenomenon to look forward to throughout the year.

Here’s what the view looked like from across New Zealand:

3 March – 11:32pm: The start of the eclipse is visible to Aucklanders as one side of the moon begins to darken. RNZ/Calvin Samuel

A photo taken at 9.37pm in Omarama over the Benmore Ranges in the South Island. Supplied / Fiona Chamberlain

4 March – 12:04am: red is visible to the naked eye as the moon is engulfed. RNZ/Calvin Samuel

4 March – 12:30am: The eclipse in near totality as the moon becomes a deep copper red. RNZ/Calvin Samuel

The moon at different stages of eclipse. Supplied / Nick McLean

As seen from Nelson. Supplied / Sonja Walker

On the way to the total eclipse, as seen from Karaka in South Auckland. Supplied / Scott Baird

Supplied / Brent

The moon above a building in Auckland. Supplied

The elipse at its max, taken from Wai-iti Dark Sky Park in Tasman. Supplied / Brent

Supplied / Alex P

Supplied / Alex P

A shot taken at the University of Canterbury Students’ Space Association telescope night. Supplied / Victoria Ding

Supplied / Alex P

Supplied / Alex P

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Survivor ‘angry and saddened’ as number of young people abused in care increases

Source: Radio New Zealand

State abuse survivor Keith Wiffin. Reece Baker/RNZ

A man who was abused in state care is “angry and saddened” that the number of children and young people being abused in care has continued to increase.

The Independent Children’s Monitor’s latest report said 530 tamaraki and rangatahi were abused in state care during the 2024/25 year, up from 507 during the 2023/24 year.

State abuse survivor Keith Wiffin said that was difficult for him and many other survivors to hear.

“In particular the 3000 courageous survivors who gave testimony to the royal comission on the basis that the appalling rates of abuse that continue would cease and we would see change and improvement.”

But he said the government and faith based institutions had not made enough changes after the Royal Comission on Abuse in Care.

“They have generally ignored the findings and recommendations of the royal comission, and therefore been contemptous of it, and that’s played a role in these continuing appalling rates of abuse.”

Keith Wiffin was abused in state care in the 1970s at Epuni boys home in the Hutt Valley and testified to the Royal Comission.

He said tinkering with the care system would not work, and fundamental change was needed for things to improve.

“That approach is: families, communties, iwi, hapu need to be resourced to look after their own. The best way to stop abuse in care is to see our young don’t go into care in the first place.”

Keith Wiffin said during his time in state care, he had a good social worker but he was completely overworked with a caseload of 80 boys.

Independent Children’s Monitor chief executive, Arran Jones, said social workers being overworked was still a problem today.

“Social workers spend a lot of time trying to find homes for young people that have to be removed from mum and dad … so that places pressure on the social work day job.

“The second thing is trying to access the help these kids need – so time taken negotiating with health and education over who will pay for supports.”

The report found a third of tamariki and rangatahi were not being visited by their social worker as often as they should be.

It also highlighted problems acessing health and education services, and Jones suggested prioritising tamaraki and rangatahi in care for these services over the general population.

“Because what the evidence tells us is tamariki in care have far worse outcomes into their adult lives than other children.”

Oranga Tamariki has been working on a National Care Standards Action Plan since early last year which Jones hoped would make a difference.

“This is the first time in the six years I’ve seen Oranga Tamariki commit to a very clear actionable plan. So this is a positive sign.”

Minister responds

Minister for Children Karen Chhour. RNZ / Samuel Rillstone

Minister for Children Karen Chhour said turning around generations of failures would not happen overnight, but she believed the most recent data from Oranga Tamariki showed progress was being made towards a stronger safety net for young people in care.

Chhour acknowledged the report identified silos and gaps between government agencies and said she had spoken to ministerial colleagues about working more closely together.

She said she was particularly proud of the progress towards working more closely with communities, strategic partners, and iwi and hapu

Oranga Tamariki responds

Oranga Tamariki chief social worker Nicolette Dickson. RNZ / Samuel Rillstone

Oranga Tamariki chief social worker, Nicolette Dickson, said it had seen performance improvements in eight out of the 10 focus areas in the National Care Standards Action Plan, and was confident about seeing sustained improvements through a focus on that work.

Dickson said more tamariki were being supported to remain safely with their whānau, and of those surveyed, 96 percent of children in care said they felt safe, 90 percent felt supported to achieve their goals and 89 percent felt they had somewhere to belong.

She agreed there were a number of areas to improve on, but said the organisation was on the right track to address them.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Generational shift sees younger investors choosing managed funds over property

Source: Radio New Zealand

Younger investors are choosing KiwiSaver over property. RNZ

Traditional property investment is losing ground to KiwiSaver and other managed funds as a preferred way to make money.

ASB’s latest Investor Confidence Survey for the fourth quarter ended in December (Q4) indicated owning your own home or having a property investment was no longer seen as providing the best returns among those surveyed.

Instead, KiwiSaver and managed funds emerged as the top two performers in the eyes of investors.

ASB senior economist Chris Tennent-Brown said the survey identified a shift in perceptions on what could deliver the strongest investment returns.

“Pretty amazing to see housing knocked off the perch,” he said.

“Despite all the global uncertainty, strong KiwiSaver and managed investment funds, those returns are flowing through to confidence in those products and outshining housing.”

The December (Q4) survey also indicated investor confidence rose 11 percent over the third quarter (Q3), with the lower North Island reporting the most significant rise with confidence rising to 10 percent in Q4, compared with 3 percent in Q3.

He said there had been a generational shift since the 1987 stock market crash saw large numbers of New Zealanders’ investments in shares.

“The generational divide is apparent with the over 60s holding steady in their belief that your own home is still the best investment, which is unsurprising.

“Gen Z on the other hand believe the best returns currently lie in investing in shares of publicly listed companies, signalling the rise of the DIY investor as an accessible path to growing your portfolio.”

Tennent-Brown said the survey underscored the importance of financial education and the evolving needs of investors.

“The under 30s have been leading the way in this shift in sentiment for some time, however this quarter’s findings show a change in sentiment among most other age groups.”

However, he said New Zealanders continued to be interested in buying homes to live in, as indicated in the increase in confidence in our Housing Confidence survey.

“I think it’s really interesting to see people hopefully separating housing as a way of putting a roof over your head, which of course is a big part of our security and aspiration in New Zealand, versus investment returns,” Tennent-Brown said.

“It just means perception of property as an investment is evolving.”

The ASB investor confidence survey had been tracking NZ market sentiment since 1997.

The latest survey was based on 672 online interviews in Q4 2025 with adults aged 18 years and older throughout New Zealand. A sample of this size had a maximum margin of error of 3.8 percent at the 95 percent confidence level. Fieldwork occurred between 1October – 16 December 2025.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Is a mark on the wall ‘damage’? Landlords, tenants puzzle over wear and tear

Source: Radio New Zealand

RNZ

A “very small dent” or black mark on a wall. A Raro spill on the carpet. A broken mop and bucket.

These are some of the issues that have divided landlords and tenants who have appeared before the Tenancy Tribunal in the past month, working out what is “wear and tear” and what counts as “damage” to a rental property.

Tenancy Services says fair wear and tear refers to the gradual deterioration of things that are used regularly by people living in a property. Tenants are not responsible for this provided they are using the property, or the chattels provided, normally.

But tenants are responsible for intentional or careless damage.

“An example of this would be where a stove element wears out from normal cooking. This is fair wear and tear. However, if the stove was being used to heat the kitchen and stopped working properly, this would not be considered normal use.”

It’s an issue that can cause a lot of consternation.

In one case heard last month, a landlord sought compensation for the $28.82 cost of replacing a mop and bucket, among more expensive items.

The adjudicator said the evidence did not prove the damage to the mop and bucket was more than normal wear and tear.

But in another, a tenant’s former partner spilled Raro on the carpet and the adjudicator was “satisfied that the damage was caused carelessly”.

Last month, a landlord who argued the walls had been damaged was told one area of damage looked to be a “very small dent or black mark” and fair wear and tear.

Another landlord was told that there was not enough evidence that the tenant caused damage by causing chips on a granite bench top or pin holes to her walls.

Cassie Metcalfe, of iRentProperty, said there was confusion among landlords and tenants about how the rules might apply.

“When we think of what’s reasonable, different people will have different interpretations of that.

“There’s a lot of things to consider. One is the number of occupants in the house, the length of the tenancy, the condition of things when the tenants first moved in. I think it takes all parties to apply a level of fairness and reasonableness to come to an agreement. There’s no clear cut line unfortunately.”

She said landlords should make sure their inspections were done to a good standard and records kept. Tenants should report issues.

“You want to make sure these are documented, photographed wherever possible. If there is wear and tear at the end of the tenancy this could end up going to the tribunal where the mediator or adjudicator is making a decision and they can rely on the evidence you have.”

Sarina Gibbon, director of Tenancy Advisory, agreed people entered tenancies with different expectations.

She said wear and tear could be thought of as “time doing its thing” while damage was “someone not doing their job”.

“When I reflect on talking to landlords and tenants it’s always that expectation if you’re on the landlord side of the equation that you expect the property to be left in a pristine condition – that the tenant should take extra care as if they own the property. Let’s be honest, we’ve all hired a car before, we know how we treat a hire car … it’s really about the relationship rather than nitpicking the little things.”

She said having a bit of room to move meant tenants and landlords had to engage with common sense and be pragmatic.

“In a way it is good that wear and tear is not strictly defined – I’m not convinced that it would serve the benefit of the sector to have it strictly defined but I understand that from a day to day it does create some frustration.

“When people are trying to nitpick a tenant for $30 damage I would say the problem isn’t the $30 problem, your biggest problem is that it is not a productive relationship.”

She said landlords were often caught out by betterment. They cannot expect to be put back into a position that is better than they were in before the damage occurred.

“The tribunal is consistently good at accounting for betterment when it is ordering compensation. If the tenant had damaged something the tribunal would say – let’s say we’re talking about carpet … the tribunal will account for the fact that it is 10-year-old carpet, you’re not going to get replacement value.

“This isn’t an insurance policy, this is about restoring the landlord back to the position the landlord would have been in if the damage had never occurred. I don’t think people go into the process expecting that they get betterment, they don’t consciously think about it because think they ‘I have to put in a new carpet so the tenant should pay for the carpet – what they don’t account for is the carpet had deteriorated for 10 years.”

NZ Property Investors Federation spokesman Matt Ball said that was a bigger problem.

“On the face of it, this seems like fair principle, however the practical application of it sometimes results in significant financial harm to the landlord. For example, you may have a perfectly good five-year-old dishwasher that has been fully depreciated, with a book value of zero. The tenant can literally destroy this appliance and the landlord cannot claim any compensation, even though the appliance may have had many years of useful service left.

“The reason for this unfairness is that depreciation isn’t a measure of the item’s actual value. Depreciation is an agreed way a business owner can offset the cost of assets against income over time. It is never a full recovery of the cost of the asset, so if the asset is damaged or destroyed, the landlord is left out of pocket. In the same way that insurance policies often have an agreed value for items covered, it would be good if the law was changed to allow the Tenancy Tribunal to set an agreed value for destroyed or damaged assets so that landlords aren’t financially disadvantaged when a tenant causes actual damage.”

He pointed to a case last year in which a landlord said insurance had covered a claim up to $15,000 for meth contamination but the cost had been $18,000 more.

The adjudicator said that after three years, things like linen, bedding, crockery and cutlery were deemed to have no value for tax purposes. The adjudicator said when things were taken out of the claim that had no residual value, there was $10,836 in damaged goods – below the insurer’s payout.

“What strikes me in this case is that the landlord is left worse off, even though, as the adjudicator states in their ruling, ‘the landlord should be returned to the position they would have been in had the tenant not breached their obligations, and should not be better or worse off’,” Ball said.

Sign up for Money with Susan Edmunds , a weekly newsletter covering all the things that affect how we make, spend and invest money.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Australia’s Middle East military HQ hit in Iranian drone attack, Qatar halts LNG production

Source: Radio New Zealand

Follow the latest with our live blog above

US President Donald Trump is warning ‘a big wave’ of strikes against Iran is yet to come.

Speaking to CNN, Trump said the US hasn’t even begun to hit the Iranian regime hard.

Missile strikes continued to fly over the Middle East overnight, with multiple countries threatening escalation of the ongoing conflict.

Top members of the Trump administration have spoken publicly about ‘Operation Epic Fury’ for the first time at a Pentagon press conference. The US said the goal of the war was not regime change, despite the deaths of top Iranian leaders, including Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the United States was not ruling out any options in the war, but promised, “This is not Iraq … This is not endless”.

Meanwhile, Iran said it was ready for a “long war” and has targeted US military bases in other Gulf states.

Kuwait said it accidentally shot down “several” US military aircraft in friendly fire.

Iran-backed Hezbollah and Israel continue to trade blows, prompting the Lebanese government to ban Hezbollah’s military and security activities and call on the group to hand over its weapons to the state.

Trump has said he envisages the conflict could last four weeks.

Follow the latest with our live log at the top of this page.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

US-Israel’s war of aggression – Epic Fury or Epic Screw-up?

COMMENTARY: By Eugene Doyle

Western countries, including  Australia and New Zealand, were quick to line up to support Operation Epic Fury, the US-Israeli blitzkrieg on the Islamic Republic of Iran.

They were effectively throwing international law into a cauldron of blood and mayhem.  These same Western powers — and the Gulf Arab states that stand with them — may soon live to regret it.

In an article on February 21, I wrote, “A precision strike on Qatar’s Ras Laffan liquefaction trains (that purify, cool, and compress the gas), for example, would drop a bomb into the world’s gas market.”

Should the Iranian state survive the terrifying onslaught, it has vowed to strike back in ways that could crash the global economy.

Early signs point to a long war
Two early signs of their potential to do so are the closure of all the civilian airports in the Gulf and the effective closure by Iran of the Strait of Hormuz.

The first one stops the daily movement of 500,000 international passengers through Doha, Abu Dhabi, Dubai and other airports, the second cuts off the shipment of 21 million barrels of oil and gas a day (20 percent of global daily requirements).

The knock-on effects of a prolonged war are almost incalculable but as I pointed out in a recent article if Iran manages to resist the most powerful military in the world, the shockwaves will soon transfer to our own economies.

I thought that would be a measure of last resort but Iran struck the site with drones on  March 3 and — should they choose — could destroy the facility entirely which would take years to rebuild.

Qatar immediately shut down Ras Laffan, the source of 20 percent of the world’s LNG. UK wholesale gas prices immediately jumped 50 percent.

Countries like Australia and New Zealand may end up on the losing end of a bidding war for oil, LNG and agricultural petrochemicals if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed.

One should remember that Iran has many thousands of short range missiles and countless mines sprinkled along its coastline which will be all-but-impossible to suppress.

“One should remember that Iran has many thousands of short range missiles and countless mines sprinkled along its coastline which will be all-but-impossible to suppress.” Image: www.solidarity.co.nz

Nuclear propaganda and mischaracterisations
For the moment, the assassination of the Supreme Leader may see champagne corks popping in Western capitals but, as I warned recently, a decapitation strike could lead a furious or desperate Iran to lash out, sinking a US aircraft carrier by using their hypersonic missiles.

There is also a non-trivial risk that the US and Israel could use nuclear weapons if things go sideways.

“Khamenei, one of the most evil people in History, is dead,” the US president gloated on his Truth Social.

Ironically, Ayatollah Khamenei is in reality the man who has done the most to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Ali Khamenei issued a fatwa (religious decree) against Iran acquiring nuclear weapons in 2003.

Along with President Masoud Pezeshkian (who campaigned successfully on a platform on lowering tensions with the US) Khamenei was the target of a barrage of missiles this weekend. One Peace President trying to kill another Peace President.

So mendacious and incoherent is the Western empire that Trump can tout the total destruction of Iran’s nuclear programme one week and the next (on February 21) his negotiator Steve Witkoff can tell the world that Iran is “one week from the bomb”. Ponder that: for the past 20 years (more than 1000 weeks) Netanyahu has been pointing at his little bomb diagram.

I am in the camp of those who say this was never about nuclear weapons and most ludicrously nothing to do with democracy. 150 dead Iranian schoolgirls is a grim testament to that.

Advancing women’s rights or imperial ambitions?
The movements in Iran for women’s rights and political pluralism will be in no way advanced by this criminal attack by states currently committing genocide in Palestine. This is a forever war against a powerful sovereign Iran that acts as a major regional player capable of being a counter-balance to a supremacist Israel and the USA.

Arab leaders appear to have had second thoughts about the benefits of destroying Iran.  Last week they expressed outrage after US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee said he would be fine with Israel fulfilling both its Zionist project and its biblical promise (Genesis 15:18) of taking all the land stretching from the Nile in Egypt to the Euphrates, a land grab which would cover modern-day Palestine, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and parts of Iraq and Saudi Arabia.

“It would be fine if they took it all,” the US Ambassador told Tucker Carlson. Not a single administration figure took him to task for the statement which he tried unconvincingly to rewind.

We should all fear victory by the US and Israel. Violent, tyrannical and expansionist, they will see victory over Iran as a stepping stone to yet more crimes against humanity.  We truly are in the throes of a Thucydidean world where the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.

Unilateral violence must not trump law.

Lions versus parrots
The Spanish Prime Minister slammed the US and Israeli strikes on Iran. “We reject the unilateral military action of the United States and Israel, which represents an escalation and contributes to a more uncertain and hostile international order,” Sánchez wrote on X.

This marks Spain out as a rebel against a militant West that funds and fuels genocide, destroys country after country, kidnaps and kills leaders, kills negotiators in the midst of negotiations, and is the greatest killer of civilians — women, children, men and babies — in foreign lands in all the decades since the Second World War.

Cuba, itself undergoing a brutal blockade imposed by the Trump regime, made a valuable contribution: “President Miguel Díaz-Canel condemned the attacks, calling them “a flagrant violation of International Law and the UN Charter.”

Cuba’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated: “Strict respect for the principles of international law and the UN Charter must prevail, in particular the sovereign equality of States, non-interference in their internal affairs, the prohibition of the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, and the peaceful settlement of disputes.”

The New York Times expressed surprise at the bellicose position Australia took: “Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was among the few leaders who did not publicly urge restraint.”

They quoted Albanese saying: “We support the United States acting to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and to prevent Iran continuing to threaten international peace and security.”

New Zealand’s Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, a Hollow Man if there ever was one, threw his copy of the UN Charter down the lavatory when he said: “We acknowledge that the actions taken overnight by the US and Israel were designed to prevent Iran from continuing to threaten international peace and security.”

Compare those two quotes. Both PMs were clearly reading from cue cards supplied by Washington. Vassals.

We are truly living through Geopolitical Epsteinism: daily violations of the weak by a predatory axis headquartered in Washington.  The West are behaving like tyrants on a rampage.  We must be stopped.

Eugene Doyle is a community organiser based in Wellington, publisher of Solidarity and a contributor to Asia Pacific Report. His first demonstration was at the age of 12 against the Vietnam war. This article was first published by Solidarity on 3 March 2026.

Article by AsiaPacificReport.nz

Labour changes tune on welfare claw backs

Source: Radio New Zealand

If the law was retrospectively passed it would effectively criminalise people who need help, not debt, Willie Jackson says. RNZ / Samuel Rillstone

The Labour Party has changed its tune on legislation that would allow MSD to legally claw back welfare payments once someone has been backpaid for an ACC claim.

Though it still looks set to pass with all three coalition partners on board.

The Ministry of Social Development (MSD) has been billing people for supplementary support, like the winter energy payment, once they have received a lump sum from the Accident Compensation Corporation.

The High Court ruled this long-standing policy illegal in late 2025.

One week ago, the Minister for Social Development Louise Upston moved a motion of urgency in the House to align the law to stop what the government described as ‘double dipping’ – legislation that would apply retrospectively.

Lawyers and health professionals urged the government to slow down on the change in a shortened Select Committee stage last week, arguing vulnerable people – including state abuse survivors and mothers with birth injuries – would be among those caught up in the change.

Ten experts also went as far as writing to Upston last Friday to warn her “the bill goes significantly further” than the government stated objective required and “risks producing serious inequity and unintended harm”.

The group suggested seven targeted amendments to the bill, including a provision where MSD could not claw back payments that were received in good faith, and where they would be inequitable.

Labour ‘cannot ignore’ concerns raised, suggests changes

At first reading, Labour’s Willie Jackson said if his party was in government it would “also be seriously looking” at the law change as “double-dipping” should always be avoided.

On Tuesday, he told the House the feedback he’d heard last week “raised serious concerns we simply cannot ignore”.

Jackson said the reality was many MSD clients waiting for an ACC payment were worse off if they had to repay supplementary support they had been forced to take while waiting for ACC support to come through.

“It simply isn’t fair that people who have acted in good faith have, for whatever reason, got an injury due to no fault of their own and are left in a worse situation when trying to seek support from MSD and ACC.

“Many sick and injured Kiwis took welfare payments while their ACC claims were being heard, they’re also some of the poorest and hardest working members of society.”

Jackson said if the law was retrospectively passed it would effectively criminalise people who need help, not debt.

“Many took those welfare payments because they had no other option while waiting for their ACC claim, they didn’t know at all that they would face a claw back and took the money in good conscience.

“So we must remember, and sometimes people forget about these people…but these people are not criminals, yet the feeling that we picked up from some of the submitters is that they made to feel like criminals when they’re burdened with debt and they really should be supported.”

Jackson suggested Labour would only support the bill at third reading if MSD was given clear discretion to not recover payments that would cause further hardship and inequity – and not claw back disability and rehab allowances.

He also said Labour’s support required an exemption for victims of abuse in state care.

“That certainly would placate a lot of our people who made submissions…we don’t believe that that should be so hard for us as a House to consider.”

New Zealand First’s Jamie Arbuckle said his party had raised concerns at first reading about unintended consequences and wanted to look at “some of the finer points to make some changes” at the committee of the whole house stage.

The bill has progressed with the support of National, New Zealand First, ACT and Labour, with the Greens, Te Pāti Māori and independent MPs Mariameno Kapa-Kingi and Tākuta Ferris opposed.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Christchurch could have protest-free zones at ‘sensitive sites’

Source: Radio New Zealand

John Minto at the Bridge of Remembrance in Christchurch. RNZ / Nate McKinnon

Protesting could be banned from some parts of Christchurch, if one city councillor gets his way.

The council will vote on Wednesday on a request staff investigate councillor Aaron Keown’s proposal to create protest-free zones at what he calls “sensitive sites”, including the Bridge of Remembrance, the Earthquake Memorial and places of worship and cemeteries

One of the city’s best-known protesters John Minto is alarmed, along with Amnesty International, which said the right to protest was fundamental.

Keown said the proposed notice of motion stemmed from complaints he had received about protests at the Bridge of Remembrance, singling out Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa (PSNA) chair John Minto.

The group has held more than 125 marches departing from the bridge, since the Israeli bombardment of Gaza began in 2023.

“As a city leader, it’s embarrassing having these people at the Bridge of Remembrance, which is a war memorial site, arguing over wars all around the world that don’t necessarily affect New Zealand, and a lot of the ones in the Middle East don’t necessarily affect New Zealand,” Keown said.

The heritage-listed bridge over the Avon River was built in 1923 to commemorate Canterbury soldiers who fought in World War I.

PSNA chair John Minto said the site was eminently appropriate to host the protests, given it included the commemoration of New Zealanders who fought and died to liberate Palestine from the Ottoman Turks during World War I.

“There are 23 New Zealand soldiers who are buried in the Gaza War Cemetery, they died fighting to liberate Palestine from the Turks. This is the most appropriate place for us to hold protests calling for the liberation of Palestine today.”

Minto said despite his long history in activism, he had never seen anything like the consistency and longevity of the pro-Palestinian movement.

“I’ve never experienced a protest movement like this where people have been consistently coming out week after week right around the country. I’m proud of New Zealanders for doing that. We’ve done it in the past and we’ll continue to do it.”

The Bridge of Remembrance in Christchurch. RNZ / Nate McKinnon

Keown said he supported free speech, but not anytime or anywhere.

“I think there’s a time and place for protests, and I don’t think it’s down there [at the Bridge of Remembrance].

“A number of businesses have talked about the disruption from the great unwashed, turning up week after week to… they just change the flag usually, and it’s another protest.

“The climate change people, the Palestine people, they’re all the same usually.”

The bylaw would also apply to other protests, such as the School Strike for Climate Change or last year’s hikoi, he said

Keown said he was not aware of specific protests in cemeteries, but planned to include them.

Minto said he had attended a cemetery protest before.

“It was a protest at the Symonds Street Cemetery in Auckland where somebody had spray painted swastikas over the Jewish graves. So I was there along with a whole pile of other people to show solidarity with the Jewish community of New Zealand against an anti-Semitic attack. So protests can can happen anywhere and it’s appropriate for them to happen wherever – there should be no restrictions.”

Mandating approved protest zones was contrary to New Zealander’s sense of democracy, Minto said.

Keown said he had not kept track of how many complaints he had received.

A Christchurch City Council spokesperson said it had received 12 complaints relating to protest activity at the Bridge of Remembrance over the past year, which included concerns about Destiny Church activity during the Pride Parade.

It had also received one complaint about a protest in New Brighton, another was received by noise control about a protest at the Commodore Airport Hotel, and four others about protests with no specific location.

No complaints were identified relating specifically to cemeteries, places of worship, or the Earthquake Memorial, the spokesperson said.

In the report accompanying the notice of motion, council staff warned “protest-free sites” could be considered an unlawful restriction on peoples’ rights, and said it would advise whether the concept could be in contravention of the Bill of Rights.

Amnesty International director of advocacy and movement building Lisa Woods said the right to protest was fundamental, and was a right that could help protect other rights.

“It’s a really important part of our society that’s used to expose injustice, demand accountability, push for change.

“Between elections there are quite limited opportunities for a meaningful say, protest is a key way we communicate to decision-makers and others in the community about what’s important and needed.”

The default position for decision makers should be to avoid restrictions and focus on facilitating protest, she said.

Limitations could be imposed, but they needed to be very specific, justified and limited – people not liking the look of a protest, or a protest disrupting business was not sufficient, Woods said.

“Protest is by its nature disruptive – that’s the point. It might cause some disruption to society’s daily functioning but only serious disruption can justify restrictions. Because it’s not a good look would not meet the test to enable a justified restriction.”

New Zealand had a proud tradition of protest, Woods said.

“We stand on the shoulders of people who have, through protest, fought for important human rights and change that we all enjoy today.

“And that continues – we want to, as a society, continue getting better, and protest is a fundamental way of that being achieved, and of achieving change in the future.”

“In our political system, there aren’t always opportunities for meaningful engagement on a regular basis in-between elections, but protest is one of the key spaces where community claims its power and tells decision makers what is important.”

Keown said police told him months ago that they needed powers like the proposed move-on orders, which he believed would help disperse protesters.

Councillor Keown welcomed the newly announced move-on powers, which he believed would “absolutely help” disperse protesters, something Woods said was of grave concern to Amnesty International.

Woods said the move-on orders were “chilling policy”.

“We are worried that it’s going to impact people protesting and how in practice such a law could be used to limit people’s rights across a range of scenarios.”

Minto said civil liberties and protest groups were concerned about misuse of the proposed powers.

“We’ll be watching very carefully how this legislation develops because there are numerous examples of legislation that’s been passed for one particular purpose but then used for another, and we’ve seen that used against the protest movement, for example trespass orders, used against the protesters quite inappropriately by the police.

“Any restriction on the right to protest peacefully in a public place, we have to resist absolutely.”

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Donald Trump campaigned against ‘endless wars’. So why is he risking another one in Iran?

Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jared Mondschein, Director of Research, US Studies Centre, University of Sydney

US President Donald Trump has summed up his rationale for attacking Iran fairly simply, saying “this was our last best chance to strike”.

Not known for adhering to any particular lasting strategy, Trump sees each day in the White House as an episode in a reality show in which he seeks an advantage over his rivals, if not to vanquish them. And Iran certainly qualifies as one of America’s most enduring rivals.

To be sure, Trump’s claim that Iran posed an imminent threat to the US is hard to justify. After all, Iran’s military and proxy groups have never been weaker.

It’s also hard for him to claim that Venezuela or Islamic State operatives in Nigeria, Syria and Iraq posed imminent threats to the US. Nonetheless, the Trump administration struck all of them over the past year.

As much as Trump may have campaigned against nation-building and “forever wars” when running for president, he certainly never campaigned against military strikes, particularly ones that entail minimal danger to American lives.

Trump campaigned in 2016 on strengthening the US fight against Islamic State. And once in office, his administration not only helped eliminate the IS caliphate – finishing the job started under the Obama administration – but also killed IS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

The first Trump administration was also behind the assassination of Iranian commander Qassem Soleimani in a brazen attack near Baghdad airport.

It is likely for this reason his administration decided to go for the death blow now, when the Iranian government is at its most vulnerable.

There were also specific circumstances that have made Trump more open to limited military actions in the past:

  • long-lasting, bipartisan frustration with an adversary
  • the support of regional US allies and partners for a strike (or at least their toleration)
  • US capability to mitigate potential responses.

And there was another undeniable factor: the increasing confidence that comes from the perceived success of previous actions. Many expected the Trump administration’s capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro to result in chaos, for instance, but that has yet to happen.

Trump in 2019: ‘Great nations do not fight endless wars.’

Decades of antagonism

This is undoubtedly a war of choice, not necessity. That said, the Trump administration is likely hoping the US can be less involved in the Middle East after this war, if it results in a different Iran.

The sentiment that fuels Trump’s antagonism towards NATO allies is the same that is motivating his war against Iran: the US wants to do less overseas.

Such a statement may appear ironic given the administration has undertaken America’s largest military attack since the invasion of Iraq 23 years ago. But this is presumably the administration’s end game with Iran, risky as it may be.

Half a century ago, Iran was second only to Israel among Middle Eastern countries with close working relationships with the United States. The post-1979 Islamic Republic, however, upended the region’s power dynamics. Iran’s top foreign policy priorities for decades have been projecting hostility towards the United States and Israel.

In that time, Democratic and Republican administrations alike have labelled Iran the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism.

For years, Iran has proudly supported Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthi rebels in Yemen, Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria, and Shia militant groups in Iraq. Such groups have killed hundreds of Americans and tens of thousands of others across the Middle East. Iranian agents also sought to assassinate Trump and other senior US officials.

Iran and its proxy groups have cost successive American administrations – both Democratic and Republican – enormous political capital and resources for decades.

It should also be said the vast majority of Iranians are against the regime and have never felt more optimistic about a brighter future since the Islamic Revolution in 1979.

Limiting factors moving forward

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has tried to distinguish the Iran war from the “forever wars” of the past, saying, “This is not Iraq, this is not endless”.

The administration is likely aware of other key differences, too.

Compared to George W. Bush’s war against Iraq in 2003, Trump has lacklustre support for the Iran strikes.

Democratic lawmakers have called the attack both unconstitutional and against international law.

Only 55% of Republicans support the attack, despite the fact Trump himself enjoys an approval rating among members of his party of around 80%.

The Trump administration hasn’t helped itself with its incoherent messaging, either. It has used a number of justifications for the strikes, including stopping an imminent Iranian attack, destroying Iran’s ballistic missiles, preventing it from acquiring nuclear weapons, cutting off support for its proxy militant groups, and regime change.

Most recently, the administration said it had to join Israel’s offensive against Iran because it was going to be drawn in by Iran’s response anyway. And Trump refused to rule out boots on the ground in Iran.

These conflicting messages don’t help sell the operation to a wary public, particularly one that is far more concerned about the economy than the Middle East. After all, the last time a foreign policy issue played a significant factor in a US election was arguably more than 20 years ago.

So, why engage in such an expensive and risky endeavour that even his own base doesn’t fully support?

One reason is the US constitution allows the president to do a lot more to change the dynamics on the ground in Iran than it does in the United States. The judicial branch, for instance, has limited Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs and deployment of federal troops domestically. Foreign policy is one area where he can be a man of decisive action.

But Trump knows a long war is not feasible. The US, Israel and their regional allies and partners face the real prospect of running low on munitions to continue defending against Iran’s far cheaper drones for the weeks or months that Trump says the war may continue.

The Islamic Republic of Iran is also facing an existential battle for its survival. The regime’s will to fight and ruthlessly effective internal security forces – combined with low US domestic support for war – means time may be on its side.

Facing increasing levels of domestic opposition, we can expect the Trump administration to try to avoid a long-term conflict in Iran. As history shows, however, it still needs an exit strategy.

ref. Donald Trump campaigned against ‘endless wars’. So why is he risking another one in Iran? – https://theconversation.com/donald-trump-campaigned-against-endless-wars-so-why-is-he-risking-another-one-in-iran-277370

Hundreds of tonnes of weeds removed in Lake Horowhenua clean-up

Source: Radio New Zealand

  • Seven weeks of weeding work at Lake Horowhenua has finished
  • More than 400 tonnes of invasive weeds collected
  • No easy fix for lake that for decades had sewage pumped into it.

Raw sewage was pumped into Punahau Lake Horowhenua for decades, earning it the dubious reputation as one of New Zealand’s most polluted waterways.

A years-long cleanup project is now working to restore it back to health, although it is not possible to yet put a timeframe on when the lake, west of Levin, will be safe to swim in again.

A special harvester has operated there for the past five summers, chopping out invasive weeds to give native species the chance to flourish, and replenish the oxygen-deprived water.

After seven weeks of weeding the lake, Tuesday is the harvester’s last day for the summer. RNZ / Jimmy Ellingham

Mowing the lake

It was a crisp but calm day when RNZ visited Lake Horowhenua and headed out on the water on the paddle steamer-like $300,000 harvester – one of two in New Zealand.

Skipper Julian Everth explained how it worked.

“You have one horizontal set of teeth, which cuts horizontally, and then two vertical ones. And as you’re going along the weed gets cut out in a chunk.

“That comes out on a conveyer belt and then lands on another conveyer belt by your feet. Once it’s full there you can shift the conveyer belt backwards more and load more on to the boat.”

Over the past seven weeks Everth and another skipper have operated the harvester for 12 hours a day – mowing the 390-hectare lake bed in a grid pattern. Tuesday was their last day this summer.

Harvester skipper Julian Everth says they’ve collected more than 400 tonnes of weed this summer. RNZ / Jimmy Ellingham

They will collect more than 400 tonnes of weed, and the odd creature too.

“We gets lots of little perch and carp. They’re both invasive species, so we’re not too worried about them.

“Occasionally we will get eels that will swim up on to the harvester. When that happens we stop the cutting process, pull backwards a little bit and allow them to swim off.”

While the lake was safe for aquatic life, it was not recommended for humans due to the bacteria it contained.

The harvested weed was scooped into a truck and taken to Feilding for composting, rather than rotting in the lake.

“Essentially, it uses up lots of nutrients in the lake to grow. Eventually it will die and collapse,” Everth said.

“You end up with a blanket of dead weed on the bottom of the lake. When that happens it rots and makes an anoxic environment. A lot of the fish and eels can’t survive in that.”

Lake still getting poisoned – guardian

Tangata tiaki Deanna Hanita-Paki said the lake was for a long time a receptacle for effluent runoff, pesticides and worse.

“Back in the 1950s and 60s the council started putting raw sewage straight into the lake. That stayed like that until about 1985.

“They’ve had years of polluting – raw sewage straight into the lake.”

Tangata tiaki Deanna Hanita-Paki says the water quality is improving. RNZ / Jimmy Ellingham

Lake trustees fought court battles to halt this, but their win took years and the effects of the pollution were devastating, Hanita-Paki said.

But the iwi Muaūpoko and the Horizons Regional Council were now putting much effort into nursing the lake back to life.

“It’s a lot better. With the harvester being there we can see the water’s getting better – the quality of that water was getting better and so was the weed changing, and our creatures were coming back.

“Our fish were coming back – same with the eels.”

But it was not perfect, as stormwater was still routed there.

“We’ve found that on those weather events the lake starts to smell and it smells different.

“I go out every month. We do water testing with Horizons. It started changing about October, November last year. The smell inside the lake was really bad.”

She said as far as she was concerned, the lake was still being poisoned due to toxins in the stormwater.

Weeding part of the plan

Horizons Regional Council fresh water and projects manager Logan Brown said lakes were complex.

“There is no silver bullet for restoration of Lake Horowhenua. There are lots of little projects that go together and they piece together.

“For all lakes across the country when we’re doing restoration you have to do both in-lake interventions and catchment interventions.”

Logan Brown, from Horizons Regional Council, says there’s no quick fix for the lake. RNZ / Jimmy Ellingham

A wetland project would also begin shortly, while the weed harvester was about to get a deep clean and then go into storage ahead of next summer.

“I like to compare it to a lawnmower. Effectively, we’re mowing the weed of the bottom of the lake,” Brown said.

“We’re not trying to get rid of all the weed. Like cutting your lawn, you leave the lawn there for stability.

“We want the aquatic plants to stay on the lake bed. That helps with stability. We get really high winds here and it just stops that stirring up on the lake bed.”

The lake is only as deep as 1.8 metres now due to silt build-up down the years.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand