Analysis by Dr Bryce Edwards: Todd Barclay’s downfall – who loses and why
[caption id="attachment_14716" align="alignleft" width="300"]
National Party MP Todd Barclay (pictured above) announced his resignation over illegal taping allegations.[/caption]
The Todd Barclay scandal reminds the public why they distrust and sometimes despise politicians. Therefore, the biggest long-term impact of the scandal might be to contribute to a nascent anti-Establishment feeling within the New Zealand electorate.
The convoluted story of what went on between Todd Barclay and his staff may prove to be a fleeting political scandal, as the news media and public move on to other issues. This is nicely summed up in two minutes by Mike Hosking in his video from yesterday: Is Barclay issue too beltway? Hosking believes the scandal is mostly only of interest to political obsessives and won’t impact on Bill English: “this won’t in the grand scheme of things damage him. This is the beltway part of the story – the fizz, the pop, the drama. It will be gone as quickly as it popped up… On balance this looks more beltway than a full-blown scandal.”
Such a reading of the situation misses the fact that this scandal has plenty of ramifications that will resonate strongly with the public. Below are some significant lessons the public might learn from the rise and fall of Todd Barclay.
1: Distrust politicians
The main observation voters are likely to take from the scandal is that politicians in general are dishonest. The public might not take an interest in every allegation, detail, and U-turn, but they will certainly see that the whole Barclay controversy revolves around allegations of deception and subterfuge – see the original story broken on Tuesday by Melanie Reid – see: Politicians, police, and the payout.
Since then, there has been more apparent economy with the truth, and the overwhelming impression is of secrets and lies.
Of course, the public already has a heightened distrust of politicians. In fact, this is one of the main drivers of politics throughout the world at the moment, including New Zealand. The New Zealand public’s view of politicians can only worsen after a scandal that merely confirms what many of us already assume – that politicians lie, and politics is a dirty game. No wonder voters are increasingly turned-off or turning to anti-politicians.
The winner could, therefore, be Winston Peters and New Zealand First, who are positioning themselves – along with Gareth Morgan – as the anti-Establishment choice for voters (and non-voters) who want to “keep the bastards honest”.
2: Distrust the “political class”
Todd Barclay has personified a particular breed of modern politician – the career politician. This is the type of politician who becomes an elected representative at a relatively young age, after working in associated areas of politics, such as for a party at Parliament. These politicians see themselves as having a life-long political career, rather than coming into politics following on from a career elsewhere where they have gathered real-life experience.
The rise and fall of Barclay is likely to reinforce the questions being asked about the increasing number of MPs coming into politics without life experience outside of student associations, media jobs, the lobbying industry, and other areas close to politics. Some younger MPs could be unfairly tarnished by Barclay’s downfall – but a healthy scepticism might be created about the trend of bringing in new politicians whose only experience of working life is the Beehive bubble.
The NBR’s Rob Hosking writes about this today, suggesting that “perhaps National needs to reconsider the rising tendency of using mostly young, former political staffers as candidates” – see: Lessons from the Barclay boilover (paywalled).
Hosking argues that National has mistakenly joined other parties in this trend towards promoting young career politicians: “Historically, National has been reluctant to do this. It has been a useful point of differentiation between National and the country’s left-wing parties. Its MPs are not, unlike Labour and, to a lesser extent the Greens, just products of the university-union-political staff-MP sausage machine. For non-partisans, a big advantage is that National MPs have had a broader life experience. Those MPs who have come through that sausage machine – no matter which party they are – possess an extraordinarily narrow view of what is important in life and it means the country is less well governed.”
For satire about Barclay’s youth, together with a plea for more experienced politicians, see Raybon Kan’s Note to Govt: Don’t hire till they’re past puberty. He makes a suggestion: “Let me throw this out there. I propose a new law: you can’t enter politics if you’re younger than 30. Below that age, you only get to enter Junior Politics… Adult stuff gets left to adult politicians. I want politicians who have lived a little.”
Perhaps even the young might have some sympathy for this. After all, there is a certain irony that the type of behaviour that has been so often identified with turning off young voters, has been so clearly on display by Parliament’s youngest MP.
We can expect the term “political class” to be used more and more in New Zealand. It’s a term used in other countries – not only about politicians but also the staff who work with them, such as spin doctors and researchers. This is because, these various careers are seen as overlapping.
It’s the arrogance associated with the political class that is particularly galling for many of the public, and the gulf between the public and our politicians is widening. Todd Barclay has exhibited this sense of entitlement in spades – see Russell Brown’s Barclay and arrogance.
Even the terms of the departure will anger many. He’s not resigning, but leaving Parliament when it suits him and his party – at the election. He will continue to receive a lucrative income, while possibly not doing much work – see David Fisher’s Todd Barclay and his $80,000 exit package from Parliament – but what will he do for the money?
And the use of taxpayer funds to pay off Barclay’s former electorate office staffer will also resonate very negatively with many voters – see Sam Sachdeva’s Barclay payout raises questions over leader’s fund and Patrick Gower’s National owes the taxpayer for Todd Barclay’s hush money.
3: Distrust the Prime Minister
Did he lie? Was he involved in a cover up? Those will be the questions that dog Bill English for some time yet. English certainly has a case to answer. Bernard Hickey explains: “The Prime Minister now faces some tough questions about why he took no action in early 2016 when he learned about the recorded conversations and why he accepted Barclay’s decision not to take questions from police. After all, English had agreed to take questions from police. Why would the MP at the centre of the allegations refuse to talk if he had nothing to hide? It seems extraordinary that English was prepared to accept the re-selection of Barclay as the MP of an electorate that is not only close to his heart – it’s his family home” – see: Bill English’s worst day as PM.
In the same scathing column, Hickey explains why this is so bad for the PM’s reputation: “make no mistake, there has been a hit to English’s reputation as a straight-down-the-line politician who doesn’t prevaricate or fudge or suffer the same ‘brain fades’ as his predecessor.”
This is elaborated upon by Tim Watkin: “This is a politician whose greatest asset is his fundamental decency. English doesn’t have the charisma, so he trades on judgment and decency. How will voters react to a PM who knows of potential illegal actions by one of his MPs, and hushes it up?” – see: Two bad decisions, one awful day for National.
This loss of trust is significant according to Patrick Gower: “Bill English has faced his first political test – and failed. He’s looked shifty on the Todd Barclay issue and there is no question that his political mana has been damaged. He can recover, and it may blow over – but there is a question mark about whether he will have lost trust with some voters. Mr Barclay may be gone but so many questions remain about why Bill English did nothing until his involvement in the recording scandal became public” – see: Bill English has damaged his political mana.
The fact that Bill English has been so reluctant to apologise over the issue will also not sit well with the public. Audrey Young comments: “The disturbing part about the events of this week at Parliament is the lack of contrition from English. Of course he is terribly sorry that it has come to this – Barclay’s premature retirement from politics. He and Barclay seem terribly sorry for themselves and their party. But English has failed to admit any wrongdoing or apologise for the way he handled things” – see: English ought to show more contrition.
Young also points to the fact that English has been much less forthcoming about the issue than he has suggested: “He did not inform the police in order that the matter be investigated. He talked to police because they had come across his text to Stuart Davie in the course of its investigation. He then sat on the information and watched while Barclay deflected questions from media and more importantly Southland electors on an issue they had a right to know about, and did nothing to encourage Barclay to cooperate with the police investigation, which was dropped.”
Similarly, Claire Trevett writes today that Bill English’s integrity was previously seen as a strong point: “In 2014, English held himself aloft from the slurry of Dirty Politics – and in fact even condemned the cynical behaviour it catalogued. He takes pride in his own integrity. So many were gobsmacked this week when it was revealed English was complicit in Barclay’s public comments by staying silent, denying any direct personal involvement, and believing the matter tidily dealt to by way of a settlement. English has claimed innocence, saying he spoke to the Police about it. But there is more than a taint of a cover up about it when it comes to the public – and that may chip at English’s own trust stores” – see: PM Bill English’s feet of Barclay.
4: Distrust the political parties
Political parties in general – and National, in particular – might find their democratic credentials tarnished by this scandal. This is because much of this infighting and intrigue has occurred at the local level, rather than in Parliament. This is best conveyed in Sam Sachdeva and Melanie Reid’s article, Investigation underway into Barclay’s Clutha-Southland selection, which details the allegations of manipulation at the branch level.
David Farrar argues Barclay’s local opponents in the National Party also come out of the scandal looking bad. He paints a picture of unprincipled National Party activists running a campaign against their own MP – see: About Todd Barclay.
And there’s also been the suggestion of intimidation by senior party figures – actions which might even be crimes, given that they appear to have attempted to stop complaints about Barclay being made to the Police – see Andrew Geddis’ It’s not the crime, it’s the coverup, and Nicholas Jones’ Police take another look at Barclay secret recording investigation.
5: Distrust the Police
The status of the Police will also be tarnished in many people’s minds due to their questionable role in investigating the allegations against Barclay. This is best explained by Audrey Young: “The police investigation took 10 months and was then closed. The police released documents to the Herald relating to the investigation under the Official Information Act but they redacted the text message sent by Bill English, which incriminated Todd Barclay, and they did not include the statement English made to them. Comparison have been made between the vigour of the police investigation in relation to John Key’s complaint over the teapot tapes, when he was accidentally taped by a cameraman with a radio mike, and the complaint by Barclay’s former electorate secretary Glenys Dickson that she had been taped” – see: Let me count the ways the Barclay scandal matters.
This has angered some. For example, the No Right Turn blogger has complained that the Police too easily gave up on the investigation of Barclay when the MP refused to be interviewed as part of the investigation: “We now know that English told them that Barclay had recordings. The legal standard for obtaining a search warrant is reasonable grounds to suspect that an offence has been committed and that evidence of that offence will be found. That standard appears to have been met simply by Bill English’s statement to them. They’d certainly conclude that in any other case (and did in the case of Bradley Ambrose). So why didn’t they do so here? I think the answer is obvious: because the police don’t want to rock the boat or potentially endanger their funding. Faced with an allegation against the powerful, they grovelled to power rather than investigating it” – see: Grovelling to power.
Finally, for the cartoonists views on the Barclay scandal, see my blog post, Cartoons about the fall of Todd Barclay.
Today’s content
All items are contained in the attached PDF. Below are the links to the items online.
Todd Barclay
Bernard Hickey (Newsroom): PM Bill English accused of cover-up over Barclay
Audrey Young (Herald): English ought to show more contrition
Barry Soper (Newstalk ZB): Bill English’s claims over Barclay affair a bit of a stretch
Claire Trevett (Herald): PM Bill English’s feet of Barclay
Benedict Collins (RNZ):PM’s opponents salt the Barclay wound
Nicholas Jones (Herald): Focus on Prime Minister and police after Todd Barclay quits
Richard Harman (Politik): How big is the Barclay damage?
Sam Sachdeva (Newsroom): Fall from grace for Baby of the House
Herald Editorial: Barclay needed help from his leaders
Raybon Kan (Herald): Note to Govt: Don’t hire till they’re past puberty
Felix Marwick (Newstalk ZB): Barclay debacle: PM tried to ‘cover up’ scandal, opposition says
Lloyd Burr and Matthew Hutching (Newshub): Barclay scandal good for NZ First – Winston Peters
Patrick Gower (Newshub): Bill English has damaged his political mana
Tracy Wakins (Stuff): MP Todd Barclay goes but PM Bill English still trying to find his footing
David Fisher (Herald): Todd Barclay and his $80,000 exit package from Parliament – but what will he do for the money?
Jane Patterson (RNZ): Barclay’s murky departure casts shadow on PM
Newsroom: How Barclay’s career went up in smoke
Isaac Davison (Herald): Opposition targets Prime Minister Bill English and police over Todd Barclay scandal
TVNZ: Bill English says he’s ‘still unclear’ on Todd Barclay’s alleged secret taping, after disgraced MP stands down for upcoming election
RNZ: Barclay controversy: PM accused of ‘cover up’
Emma Hurley (Newshub):Live updates: Todd Barclay to step down after secret recording scandal
Eleanor Ainge Roy (Guardian): ‘Secret recordings’ scandal hits New Zealand prime minister months before election
Stuff: Todd Barclay’s sister defends disgraced MP on Facebook
Political integrity issues
Gyles Beckford (RNZ): ‘Corruption is real in New Zealand, it’s happening
Herald: Conflicts of interest on the rise in Australasia
OASIS: GCSB Director wanted to be useful – offered spies to Groser
Ann Webster (Audit Blog):Data and integrity
Peter Adams (Dominion Post): Trust priceless when it comes to charities
Jo Moir (Stuff): Winston Peters reveals failures by Fuji Xerox that went ignored by Government
No Right Turn: Treasury and the OIA
Employment
Julie Haggie (Spinoff): The Pay Equity deal was supposed to be a big win for rest home workers. Now the government is going back on its word
Nicholas McBride (Stuff): Mental health workers excluded from equal pay deal
Ross Guest and Kirsten MacDonald (Conversation): What Australia can learn from the New Zealand retirement system
Julia Shallcrass (Herald): Why aren’t more companies embracing diversity?
Anna Loren (Stuff): Women hold female bosses to higher emotional standard than male bosses – study
Next: The Green Party’s Metiria Turei on fixing New Zealand’s gender pay gap
Health
Ben Gray (Stuff): ACC is not broken: The legal fiction at the heart of the problem
Nicholas McBride (Stuff): Thousands with mental health conditions stuck on benefit for years
Jamie Small (Stuff): Labour promises mental health plan: Free GP visits, more nurses in schools
Karen Brown (RNZ): Coleman grilled over Health Ministry review
Stacey Kirk and Rachel Thomas (Stuff): State Services Commissioner defends embattled health official against ‘inappropriate’ attacks
Rachel Thomas (Stuff): Contraceptives, education hailed as heroes as abortion rates lowest in 25 years
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Abortions down again
Education and Training
Hannah Martin (Stuff): National decline in the number of students attending school regularly, report shows
Simon Collins (Herald): Minister issues ‘please explain’ after NCEA plagiarism praised as ‘excellence’
Michael Hayward (Stuff): Ministry of Education apologises to Canterbury schools after scathing Ombudsman report
Kurt Bayer (Herald): Government’s shake-up of post-quake Canterbury schools mishandled, Chief Ombudsman finds
RNZ: Chch school closures were a ‘bombshell’ – Ombudsman
Eleanor Ainge Roy (Guardian): No classrooms, lessons or homework: New Zealand school where children are free to roam
Madison Reidy (Stuff): Government announces $7m funding boost for apprentices
Aimie Cronin (Listener): Class Captain: Nikki Kaye, New Zealand’s youngest female Minister of Education
Simon Wilson (Spinoff): Chlöe and Jacinda go back to school
Colin Craig v Rachel MacGregor
Herald: Colin Craig weighing up legal options against MacGregor
Anna Leask (Herald): Rachel MacGregor files lawsuit against Colin Craig
Stuff: Rachel MacGregor counter-sues Colin Craig for defamation
Housing
Julia Wiener (Interest): We have tracked Labour’s housing policies over the last two elections; they haven’t changed as much as you’d think
Willie Jackson (Daily Blog): Slumlord’s have to go
Catherine Harris (Stuff): Trades group calls for better standards system following London fire
Environment
Rachel Stewart (Herald): Let’s have a ball and forget about blue ball
Gerard Hutching (Stuff): Greens see fertile fields for cooperation with farmers
Mitchell Alexander (Newshub): ‘It does make you think about life’: Labour’s Andrew Little talks about battle with cancer
Election and democracy
Mike Hosking (Herald): Here’s my election call
Richard Harman (Politik): Labour Party volunteer workers rebel over living conditions
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Political donations
No Right Turn: Our political parties are owned by the rich
Oliver Hartwich (NZ Intitiative): Time for a New Zealand first
Anne-Marie McDonald (Wanganui Chronicle): Hekia Parata supporting women candidates for National
Peter McKenzie (Constitution for Aotearoa): Why a constitution alone is not enough
Anthony Robins (Standard): Should The Left Do Authoritarian Populism Like The Right Does?
Jo McKenzie-McLean (Stuff): Error misses off electors in Otago Regional Council by-election
Economy
Tom Pullar-Strecker (Stuff): Labour labels Government action on multinational tax ‘unambitious’
Andrea Black (Let’s talk about tax): No accounting for tax
Fran O’Sullivan (Herald): Drama aplenty in stellar finance career
Patrick O’Meara (RNZ): Alternative to investor-state dispute tribunals put forward
Tina Morrison (Listener): The Maori economy is booming – just not for Ngapuhi
Michael Reddell (Croaking Cassandra): The Secretary to the Treasury on productivity
Police and justice
RNZ: Labour calls for audit of police IT projects
RNZ: Call for newspapers in prisons nationwide
Herald: Crime ‘out of control’ in Whanganui claims Peters, but stats say otherwise
Other
Isaac Davison (Herald): Sue Bradford, the constant radical, on drugs, rape and suicide
Michael Daly (Stuff): New Zealand and Australia tied in ninth place on social progress index
Herald: New Zealand now 9th equal on world Social Progress Index
Herald: Broadcaster leaving Radio New Zealand after 53 years
Jono Galuszka (Manawatu Standard): Politicians divided over suggestion Palmerston North could take more refugees
Herald: Aussies name NZ as their new ‘best friend’ as Uncle Sam’s allure fades
Katie Kenny (Stuff): New Zealand existed before America started paying attention
Tracy Hicks (Southland Times): We need a game changer, which is laid out in the regional development strategy
Catherine Harris (Stuff): Cannabis could be sold by non-profits and funds fed back to community: Massey paper
Audit Blog: Looking back over the last year … we’re not just about the numbers!
John Drinnan (ZagZigger): Kiwi Magazines Maestro To Run Bauer Australasian Empire
Brian Rudman (Herald): War breaks out over World War One memorial
Harriet Gale (Spinoff): The third main: why is a $58m rail option being ignored while a $1.4 billion road rolls on?
No Right Turn: Winston’s war with the Speaker
Henrietta Bollinger (RNZ): Hey Nicky Wagner! Your words matter
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): A great appointment ]]>
Bryce Edwards Analysis: Todd Barclay’s downfall – who loses and why
Bryce Edwards Analysis: Labour calls off the search for the missing million
Dr Bryce Edwards.[/caption]
Labour’s Campaign for Change has gone horribly wrong. As with the other scandal of the week, it’s a saga that appears to involve political deception, incompetence, and hypocrisy. But it also goes to prove just how fraught it is to try to mobilise the “missing million”.
Matt McCarten in happier days photographed with then Labour leader David Cunliffe.[/caption]
Unprecedented outpouring of grief at funeral for Vanuatu president
AsiaPacificReport.nz
By Dan McGarry in Port Vila
Vanuatu has never seen an outpouring of sorrow and admiration such as it witnessed yesterday.
Many alive today may not see another in their lifetime.
Heads of state from Fiji, New Zealand and Australia all attended the state funeral, which was held in the Parliamentary rotunda, commonly known as the “pig’s tusk” because of its spiral architecture.
They were joined by dignitaries from China, the United States of America, Tonga and elsewhere.
The service for President Baldwin Lonsdale, who died early last Saturday morning, was offered by the Bishop of Melanesia — out of deference to Rev Lonsdale’s status as a clergyman in the Anglican church.
In front of a solemn gathering that included Vanuatu’s living former Presidents, Prime Minister Charlot Salwai, his ministers and MPs.
Opposition Leader Ishmael Kalsakau and hundreds of people from all walks of life, the choir opened the service with a moving musical rendition of the 23rd Psalm.
Outside Parliament, thousands of school children and members of the public lined the road, waiting for the cortege that would escort the body of the late President to the airport, where it would be flown to the Banks islands, his home.
Festooned with flowers
Following the service, Rev Lonsale’s casket was loaded onto the back of a flatbed truck festooned with flowers and the Vanuatu flag. It led a kilometre-long procession of hundreds of vehicles through the main streets of Port Vila.
The road was carpeted with flowers all along the procession route. In the Manples area, the road was lined with brightly coloured calicos. As the procession passed, the market vendors sang a song in the Tongoan language, a moving tribute to one of the most widely respected figures in Vanuatu since Father Walter Lini, the country’s first Prime Minister.
It is difficult to accurately estimate the number of people who lined the roughly six-kilometre long route, but there has been no similar public gathering in living memory.
This unprecedented display of grief and admiration was not limited to Vanuatu alone. In solidarity with this nation, flags flew at half mast yesterday in Australia, New Zealand and in other locations throughout the Pacific Islands.
The body was flown to the Banks islands yesterday, and the President will be mourned by the people of Torba province today. His body will be laid to rest in Sola, Vanua Lava tomorrow.
Dan McGarry is media director for the Vanuatu Daily Post group.
President Baldwin’s coffin draped with the Vanuatu flag at the funeral in Port Vila yesterday. Image: Selwyn Leodoro/FB‘Anticipation, excitement’ sweep PNG as election polling looms
AsiaPacificReport.nz
Pacific Media Centre News Desk
Polling in Papua New Guinea’s 2017 national election begins this weekend.
On Saturday, voters will take to the polling booths after a six-week campaign which began on April 24.
“Anticipation” and “excitement” is the current general feeling, Papua New Guinean citizen and AUT doctoral candidate Stephanie Sageo-Tupungu told 95bFM’s weekly Southern Cross radio programme on Monday.
“Everyone is now thinking about who they’re going to vote for, how they’re going to go about it.”
But as voting looms, however, the effectiveness of candidates’ campaigns remains unclear due to an apparent lack of funding.
As ABC’s PNG correspondent Eric Tlozek reported, the 2017 election campaign has been “relatively quiet” due to an “economic slump”.
Tlozek said this economic downturn meant candidates did not have the money to “splash out” on advertising.
“There is simply no money and sometimes no economic justification,” Tlozek said.
Ben Micah of the People’s Progress Party – part of an opposition coalition with Kerenga Kua of the PNG National Party, Patrick Pruaitch of the National Alliance and former Prime Minister Sir Mekere Morauta – told Pacific Beat: “The major problem confronting our country is the fact the government is broke.”
Current government ‘plague’
Micah likened the shortage of funds, issues of maladministration and corruption to a “plague”.
Sageo-Tapungu told Asia Pacific Report “these are some common issues that the candidates are campaigning on.”
Candidates in the 2017 national election are also promising to improve infrastructure – roads, bridges – in bringing services to remote communities, solve land grabbing issues and ease current violence surrounding settlements and ethnicity, she said.
This comes in the wake of Election Commissioner Patilias Gamato calling for “free and fair” elections:
“Our theme for 2017 — “Your Choice Protect our Democracy” — speaks volumes and I urge every citizen of this country to uphold the rule of law. The decision we make today affects our future and the future of our children’s children. I urge every citizen to refrain from illegal conduct and allow for a free and fair election.”
However, gender equality has also been a focus this election and a source of hope for many in PNG surrounding equal rights.
Loop PNG reported the number of female candidates standing in the current election comprised 165 of the total 3332 candidates.
Female representation question
The only province that did not register a female candidate was West New Britain, Loop PNG said.
Papua New Guinea’s 2017 national elections have seen a rise in female candidates compared to the 135 in 2012, which saw only three female candidates succeed – Eastern Highlands governor Julie Soso, Sohe MP Delilah Gore and Lae MP Loujaya Kouja.
Stephanie’s husband, Kenneth Sageo-Tupungu, told Southern Cross:
“There’s been a rise in women’s numbers, candidates, and this has in a way really changed the dynamic of the game itself and this has really challenged the existing status quo of elections and campaigns.”
However, Stephanie Sageo-Tupungu questioned whether equal participation would become a reality.
“For female representation in politics in PNG for this year, it’s encouraging to see about 165 contesting this election — that’s quite a number compared to the past years and they have a support base.
“We hope to see them be successful, but the thing is, it’s a male game in PNG … Male politicians support women’s participation in theory. In practice, that is to be seen as a reality.”
Voting in PNG’s 2017 national election on Saturday and closes July 8.
New governance watchdog PNGi exposes O’Neill’s business networks
AsiaPacificReport.nz
Pacific Media Watch News Desk
PNGi is set to revolutionise governance in Papua New Guinea by cracking open the secrets of the rich and powerful and exposing them to public view.
Using the latest digital technologies, PNGi aims to investigate, analyse and expose the often hidden and opaque systems standing behind the abuse of political and economic power.
Its two flagship resources are the PNGi Portal and PNGi Central websites,
They have been established and are sustained by an informal network of academics, activists and journalists involved in researching and writing about current issues in Papua New Guinea.
“In accordance with a robust risk assessment process, in some instances, contributors are protected by publishing their work anonymously,” said PNGi in a response to a query from Pacific Media Watch.
“However, all published material has been peer-reviewed, and is rigorously referenced, using freely accessible documentary sources. This allows anyone to verify each factual claim made.”
The PNGi Portal is an on-line database of governance reporting. It collates documents produced by institutions like the Ombudsman Commission, Auditor General and Public Accounts Committee and makes them available to the public through a powerful search engine.
The public can now search and cross-match reports, to uncover serial misconduct by target individuals or entities.
The database is a major addition to due diligence in Papua New Guinea. It will add value to the work of journalists, researchers, students, public officials, oversight agencies, citizens and responsible corporate actors.
Sitting alongside the portal is PNGi Central, a reporting platform that will use a range of formats to communicate the results of research into:
— the discrete networks that lie at the heart of the country’s economic and political power, and which are mired in allegations of improper and illicit conduct;
— the institutional and legal mechanisms the networks use;
— common transaction patterns; and
— the broader policy and legal factors that are permissive of improper or illegal activities.
PNGi Central represents the most sophisticated reporting effort yet in the region, to speak truth to power through rigorous research, accessible to the public through digestible mechanisms ranging from feature investigations, through to podcasts, power profiles and court reports.
O’Neill’s business network
To launch the new websites and illustrate PNGi’s research capabilities, PNGi Central has published a report into the business network of current Prime Minister Peter O’Neill.
Titled The Midas Touch, this investigative feature, to be published in three-parts, will reveal hundreds of millions of kina in assets owned by the Prime Minister, and a business empire that has its origins in alleged frauds condemned in two Commissions of Inquiry.
Part I, published today, unlocks for the first time the evidence of the Prime Minister himself, as published in Commission transcripts, and unravels a complicated series of corporate takeovers and hidden deals that have made Peter O’Neill a very wealthy man.
Parts II and II will follow over the coming weeks.
Once complete, The Midas Touch will expose how the Prime Minister’s corporate empire has benefited from government decision making, multi-lateral loans, and even foreign government spending.
PNGi contributions aim is to stimulate debate and encourage the development of new laws and policies that will be effective in the fight to control market abuse, corruption and other improper dealings, and, ultimately, to improve the lives of ordinary citizens.
The Papua New Guinea 2017 general election is June 24 until July 8.
Five PNG police officers sentenced to 87 years in jail for rape, arson
AsiaPacificReport.nz
By Sally Pokiton in Wewak, Papua New Guinea
Former Wewak Police Station commander Chief Inspector Sakawar Kasieng has been sentenced to seven years in prison for arson and four of his officers were convicted for raping a 17-year-old girl at her family home almost four years ago. They were each sentenced to 20 years in prison.
Kasieng, of Sibilanga Village, Sandaun Province, spent four months in custody prior to being sentenced yesterday. He will now spend six years and eight months in hard labour.
Robin Weibi of Tomonoum Village, Nuku, Sandaun Province, Timon Kangapu of Hirae Village, Kopiago, Southern Highlands Province, Stanley Moui Jombu of Passam, East Sepik Province, and Nigel Tianguma Harvey of Mikarew area, Bogia, Madang Province, were each sentenced to 20 years.
They also spent four months in custody. They will now spend 19 years and eight months with hard labour.
They were found guilty and convicted for aggravated rape of the teenager in her room at Kwanumbo Village in the early hours of 7 December 2013.
The victim, who is now 21 years old, gave evidence in court during the trial with her mother and father.
Her father was serving a 40 years in jail sentence for murder when he and other prisoners escaped.
Dawn raid
On 7 December 2013, at least 15 policemen, led by Chief Inspector Kasieng, with the assistance of civilian informants, conducted a dawn raid on a hamlet at Kwanumbo Village, Boikin, East Sepik Province.
This was to capture a number of prison escapees, including the rape victim’s father.
The court heard that during the raid, two houses were torched, items were stolen and the escapees were apprehended and tied up. One escapee had his leg shot at after he had been restrained.
The four named policemen then entered the victim’s house and raped her. Her hands and legs were held onto the floor as each one took his turn to rape her.
When the victim’s mother complained to Chief Inspector Kasieng, she was told to shut up and on the police chief’s orders, she was assaulted and restrained by policemen.
On their arrest, Inspector Kasieng and the four policemen exercised their right to remain silent.
Justice George Manuhu handed down the sentence in Wewak yesterday after he heard a submissions on the sentence by the accused’s lawyer on Monday.
During submissions on Monday, each of the convicted prisoners of the state expressed remorse and willingness to pay compensation.
Failure to control
Former Chief Inspector Kasieng admitted his failure to control the operation, which resulted in the burning down of two houses, the shooting of Joel Pokip in the legs, and the sexual assault on the teenager.
“In any case, the four of you knew the law and you knew that sexually assaulting someone is against the law. So the four of you cannot place all the blame on Kasieng,” Justice Manuhu told them in court.
The court also noted that it was not Kasieng’s first time in court. He had previously been in court for assault and he had failed to pay court-ordered compensation.
“These reports do not help him at all,” the judge told him.
“Fortunately, the victim did not contract any sexual disease, she did not become pregnant, there is no evidence of any mental issues, and she did not suffer from any physical injuries. In relation to the burning down of the house, there was no evidence on the value of the house. These are the factors that are in your favour.
“Against you is that as policemen, you were charged with the responsibility to uphold the law and by virtue of that law, you have a duty to protect the citizens of this country.
‘Acted like criminals’
“But look at what you have done. You acted in contradiction to your duty and committed crimes against the people you were supposed to protect.
“You acted like criminals, all of you,” Justice Manuhu told them.
He said the warrant issued by the court did not authorise them to burn down houses and sexually assault the teenager.
“I don’t know what went through your heads in those two hours you were in the village. You have brought shame upon all of us as officers of the law.”
He said the undisciplined behaviour of policemen in Papua New Guinea was prevalent and destroying the country, and that people awere fed up with hearing about undisciplined policemen.
PNG grants citizenship to 138 West Papuans, waives legal fees
AsiaPacificReport.nz
By Delly Waigeno in Port Moresby
Four naturalised citizens and 138 West Papuans have become citizens of Papua New Guinea.
Acting Chief Migration Officer Solomon Kantha said he was proud that the current government had been the first to take steps to see West Papuans get legal status in Papua New Guinea.
He also acknowledged the government for doing away with the K10,000 (about NZ$4350) citizenship fee for West Papuan refugees.
The citizenship certificate ceremony was a small but significant affair at the Sir John Guise Stadium Indoor Complex at the weekend in Port Moresby.
Present included officers from the Immigration and Citizen Service Authority, PNG Citizenship Advisory Committee and the board, recipients, family and friends.
Acting Chief Migration Officer Kantha said the four naturalised citizens who originated from China, Philippines and the United States had already contributed immensely to Papua New Guinea.
For the larger group of West Papuans, he acknowledged their resilience without government support and also acknowledged their contribution towards nation building.
Naturalised citizen Stephen Dunran expressed gratitude.
Kantha said the Department of Foreign Affairs and Immigration would work on getting the citizenship certificates signed and issue passports as well.
More than 10,000 West Papuan refugees are believed to be living in Papua New Guinea — many have been in the country for more than three decades.
More than 1000 West Papuans are reported to be in line for PNG citizenship.
Delly Waigeno is an EMTV News reporter.
Juffa blasts PNG for ‘hypocrisy’ over deportation of NZ missionary
AsiaPacificReport.nz
Oro Governor Gary Juffa blasts PNG government over the deportation of NZ Catholic missionary Douglas Tennent. Video: EMTV News
Pacific Media Watch News Desk
Oro Governor Gary Juffa has condemned the Papua New Guinea government for “hypocrisy” and “double standards” over the controversial deportation of New Zealand Catholic missionary Douglas Tennent.
Acting Chief Immigration Officer Solomon Kantha told EMTV News that Tennent’s deportation last week related to “visa conditions”.
However, Juffa, who has been vocal about foreign investors in the country during the election campaign, said the move by the Immigration Office to deport Tennent was illegal and not in the best interests of Papua New Guineans who were being marginalised on their own land by big foreign companies.
NZ Catholic missionary Douglas Tennent … deported over helping landowners. Image: EMTV NewsIf the current PNG government was interested in the people it would support Tennent and say, “let us fight this corruption and deal with this on behalf of the landowners,” Juffa said.
The PNG Immigration Department is reviewing its decision to deport Tennent, reports Cathnews.
Kantha said Tennent’s visa had been cancelled by Immigration and Foreign Affairs Minister Rimbink Pato because of his alleged involvement in landowner issues, the NZ Catholic news service reported.
The acting immigration head said the decision was based on a “complaint” from landowners in East New Britain.
The Sikite Mukus palm oil project has been a “hive of landowner dispute” between those who want the project and those who do not want the project, EMTV News said.
Archbishop refuses
The Post-Courier reported that Kantha had told the archbishop of Rabaul, Francesco Panfilo, that Tennent could reapply for a new visa and work permit.
However, the archbishop has refused to do so unless he receives reassurance from PNG’s Foreign Affairs Department that Tennent could return.
He is also demanding to know who lodged the complaint letter.
The managing director of the landowners’ umbrella company, Memalo Holdings Ltd, has denied being responsible.
Wesley Pagott said although the members of Sigite Mukus Integrated Rural Development Project (SMIRDP) disagreed with with what Tennent had been doing, they were surprised to hear that he was deported.
Memalo Holdings was originally incorporated listing six separate landowner companies as shareholders.
They were all incorporated on the same day. Two have since been delisted.
Memalo controls the land on which the SMIRDP is being developed by the Malaysian logging company Rimbunan Hijau Group (PNG).
The group has a diverse set of interests that encompass forestry, timber processing, palm oil, transport, media, retail and property development.
It is a wholly owned subsidiary of Rimbunan Hijau, a company based in Sarawak, Malaysia.
Governor pledges support
The Acting Governor of East New Britain, Cosmas Bauk, has pledged his support for Tennent, Cathnews reported.
He said he would do everything in his power to make sure that Tennent could return to continue on with his work.
Bauk said he was disappointment at the manner in which the current government had been doing its business without regards to the people’s fight for justice and what they rightfully claimed as theirs.
He commended the church for their efforts in assisting the people in Pomio and East New Britain and would stand with the church in this fight.
The Papua New Guinea 2017 general election is June 24 until July 8.
]]>Images: ‘No BCL, no mining,’ say protesting Panguna women
AsiaPacificReport.nz
Landowner women and mothers have protested over plans to reopen the Panguna mine on Bougainville in Papua New Guinea.
They demonstrated in Arawa in central Bougainville and blockaded the route to the derelict Panguna copper mine late last week in a bid to prevent the signing of a memorandum of agreement between the Autonomous Bougainville Government (ABG) and Bougainville Copper Limited, which has disputed ownership of the mine.
The women also succeeded in getting a court injunction against the mine agreement in the National Court in Port Moresby on Friday afternoon.
Llane Munau was there to capture the women’s protest on camera.
]]>‘Make election less disruptive’ pleads commissioner ahead of PNG ballot
AsiaPacificReport.nz
By Gorethy Kenneth in Port Moresby
More than 800 election monitors will be deployed nationwide to observe and make independent reports on Papua New Guinea’s national election starting this Saturday.
Electoral commissioner Patilias Gamato says international and local monitors will report back to their respective organisations, heads of governments and the government itself on the credibility of the PNG election process.
“We have invited international election monitors or observers to visit during the months of June and July to see whether we have planned well for the election and also see if we followed the rule of law and the election laws on conducting the 2017 national election,” Gamato said in a statement.
“These election monitors or observers are invited from the Commonwealth Secretariat, European Union, governments of Australia and New Zealand, resident heads and staff of foreign missions from Australia, Great Britain, United States of America, France, Japan, Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat, Melanesian Spearhead Group Secretariat, Australian National University and other election management bodies from other parts of the world,” he said.
“Our very own civil society watchdog, Transparency International (PNG) Inc., again will deploy 400 election monitors, the largest number of monitors nationwide,” Gamato said.
He also appealed for calm in the remaining seven days of campaigning and the next month of polling and counting.
“Fellow Papua New Guineans, emotional reactions to your political opponents by supporters must not be encouraged. But as a responsible leader, you must always urge restraint and discourage such bad acts or violence,” he said.
Less disruptive, violent
“As your Electoral Commissioner, I strongly urge each and every one of you, the leaders of political parties, tribes and clans to make this election far less disruptive or violent than previous national elections,” Gamato said.
“Let’s have a good and peaceful 2017 national election to demonstrate to our regional neighbours and the international community that Papua New Guinea is truly democratic and has a vibrant democracy.”
More than 500 of these election observers have now arrived in Port Moresby, ready to kick-start election scrutiny.
They will be meeting with all the party executives tomorrow.
Sensitive election materials have also been moved from the capital to provincial centres nationwide over the last seven days by the Australian defence force ahead of polling.
The materials include ballot papers, candidate posters, polling schedules and electoral rolls, Gamato said.
“So far the Papua New Guinea Electoral Commission is all good to go and set for the 2017 national election.”
Gorethy Kenneth is a senior reporter with the PNG Post-Courier.
Panguna landowner women protesters block mine pact, win court order
AsiaPacificReport.nz
Panguna women landowner protesters — mothers from the mining affected areas and the women from Central Bougainville — have demanded the Autonomous Bougainville Government to properly address the Panguna Mine issue. Video: EMTV News
Pacific Media Centre News Desk
Panguna women protesters have blockaded the copper mine to prevent the signing of a memorandum of understanding by the Bougainville government with the company and also won a court injunction.
Justice Kandakasi ordered in the Waigani National Court on Friday that the MOA cannot be signed until further notice.
Philip Miriori, chairman of the Special Mining Lease Osikaiyang Landowners Inc., welcomed the restraining order.
Mothers and daughters at the Panguna mine protest on Friday. Image: Loop PNGHe said it was good to see that protection from “unjust deprivation of property” under Section 53 of the Constitution of PNG – and preserved in the Constitution of the Autonomous Bougainville Government (Section 180) as adopted by the Bougainville Constituent Assembly at Buin on 12 November 2004 – was being enforced.
The Bougainville Freedom Movement also congratulated the women of Bougainville and their supporters for stopping the Bougainville government on Friday from signing a new agreement for Bougainville Copper Limited (BCL) to reopen the Panguna mine.
The National Court order supporting the Panguna women landowners seeking to block Bougainville Copper Limited. Image: PMC“The handpicked BCL landowners who were supposed to sign the agreement for the company were brought to a halt, thanks to the road block protest held on Friday,” said BFM’s Vikki John.
The Panguna mine was abandoned by in 1989 after frustration by landowners erupted into a decade-long armed uprising and a push for Bougainville independence from Papua New Guinea.
‘Seven sisters’ roadblock
Loop PNG reports: “The impenetrable roadblock was led by women chief from the ‘seven sisters’ areas in Central Bougainville.
The mothers, together with their daughters, youths, ex-combatants and Bougainville hardliners, set up the roadblock, which started on Thursday night and lasted throughout Friday. They refused to move for passing vehicles or negotiating team.
“Their message was simple: ‘No BCL, No Mining’.
A woman chief from Guava Village, Maggie Mirau Nombo, and a chief from Arawa and Pirurari, Kavatai Baria, said their land was their ‘Mother’, who provided their everyday needs and no one was allowed to exploit her.
“Chief Maggie, who is a former primary school teacher, said how could those wanting to sign the MOA conduct such an act of injustice?
“She said this would never happen again because they had suffered enough from all the injustice that had been brought on by BCL when it was in operation.
“She said God had heard the cry of the Bougainville women, and justice would prevail.
“As long as I am the Chief from Panguna and Guava Village and owner of my land, BCL is not welcome. This is the company that has killed our sons and daughters. ABG has to stop ignoring the cries of the women and take note that BCL is never allowed to come back to Panguna, and this is final and it is not negotiable,” she said.
“Chief Kavatai also reminded everyone that ‘when God closes a door, no one can open it, and if God opens a door, no one can close it’.
“Panguna Mine was closed by God and if anyone was trying to reopen the mine when it wasn’t God’s timing, then they had better watch out because they were fighting against a big God.
“Because of the strong opposition by the women, youths and Bougainville hardliners, the high-powered ABG delegation, led by President John Momis, returned to Buka on Friday afternoon without signing the MOA.”
The Papua New Guinea 2017 general election is June 24 until July 8.
]]>Al Jazeera caught in the Qatar crisis crossfire, reports Mediawatch
AsiaPacificReport.nz
Pacific Media Watch News Desk
So-called “fake news” and the damage it can do has featured much in the media in recent months.
Radio NZ’s Mediawatch looks at how one false story sparked a row between Qatar and its neighbours, which has now cast a shadow over the future of the pioneering international TV news channel Al Jazeera.
Author Tarek Cherkaoui … insights into Al Jazeera. Image: RNZ MediawatchMediawatch’s Jeremy Rose interviews Dr Tarek Cherkaoui, holder of an Auckland University of Technology doctorate and author of The News Media at War, on how the clash between Western and Arab media perspectives has contributed to global polarisation.
Al Jazeera English has reflected a sympathetic view of the Arab Spring upheaval and Al Jazeera Arabic has been challenging for authoritarian regimes in the region.
Russian ‘freelance’ hackers
An inquiry last week by the FBI found that Russian “freelance” hackers were responsible of the fake news broadcast on the state-run Qatar News Agency, sparking the biggest crisis in decades crisis among the Gulf States.
A Guardian report said: “Some observers have claimed privately that Saudi Arabia or the United Arab Emirates (UAE) may have commissioned the hackers.”
Earlier this month, after the fake news report, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, and Bahrain launched an unprecedented campaign to isolate Qatar diplomatically and economically with a transport blockade over alleged links to the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and Iran. Qatar has rejected the allegations as “without foundation”.
Al Jazeera employs a number of New Zealand journalists and is the only global news channel broadcast on the free-to-air platform Freeview in New Zealand.
Vanuatu president who struck ‘decisive blow’ against corruption dies
AsiaPacificReport.nz
OBITUARY: Pacific Media Watch News Desk
Vanuatu’s President Baldwin Jacobson Lonsdale has died at Vila Central Hospital early today after being rushed to hospital last night, reports Vanuatu Digest.
President Lonsdale, 67, had been Head of State since September 2014.
From Mota Lava island, Lonsdale was previously an Anglican priest, secretary-general of Torba Province.
He did his tertiary studies in Auckland, New Zealand, at St John’s Theological College.
President Lonsdale played a critical role in recent events in Vanuatu. While category 5 Cyclone Pam was battering Vanuatu in March 2015, President Lonsdale was attending a world conference on disaster risk reduction in Japan, and his emotional appeals for international assistance helped galvanise the international humanitarian response to Cyclone Pam, reports Vanuatu Digest.
But arguably his greatest contribution came just seven months later in October 2015 when the then Speaker of Parliament, Marcellino Pipite, abused his position as Acting President to issue a “presidential pardon” to himself and 13 other MPs who had just been convicted of bribery.
The President, en route from Samoa during Pipite’s attempt to undermine the rule of law, returned to Vanuatu and immediately revoked the pardon.
Misuse of powers
During a televised address to the nation, President Lonsdale was visibly upset, expressing his “shame and sorrow” at Pipite’s misuse of his powers.
He vowed to “clean the dirt from my backyard”, telling Vanuatu’s people that “we as a nation have to stop these crooked ways”.
Following a failed appeal against his revocation of Pipite’s pardon, Lonsdale then dissolved Parliament and called a snap election.
President Lonsdale’s actions were widely seen as a decisive blow against Vanuatu’s culture of impunity for corrupt politicians, reports Vanuatu Digest.
Addressing the newly-elected MPs at the opening session of Parliament following the election, he described the new legislature as a “new chart for Vanuatu’s destiny”.
He will also be remembered for his leadership of Vanuatu’s Anglican church, and his strong support for kastom and for women’s rights.
The Vanuatu government is currently making arrangements with his family and Motalava chiefs for a state funeral.
Under the constitution, a new president will need to be elected by MPs and local government chairs within three weeks.
PM O’Neill challenges rival candidates to show off ‘real policies’ for election
AsiaPacificReport.nz
Speaking about the controversial Manus Asylum Centre saga, Prime Minister Peter O’Neill says the deal was signed and agreed to for the development of Manus province. Video: EMTV News in Tok Pisin
Pacific Media Watch News Desk
The largest crowd ever to attend an election campaign rally on Manus greeted Prime Minister Peter O’Neill as he campaigned with Manus Governor Charlie Benjamin and Manus Open candidate Job Pomat.
Leading the People’s National Congress (PNC) campaign rally, O’Neill said Manus had great potential from its marine resources, particularly in areas such as fisheries and tourism.
As the campaign draws to the end of eight weeks of campaigning, O’Neill said yesterday now was the time for candidates who had not demonstrated any policy platforms to reveal if they have any policies.
Prime Minister Peter O’Neill and Manus Governor Charlie Benjamin in Manus province. Image: PMO“Now is the time to talk about your policies, to talk about your vision and reveal if you have anything to offer,” the Prime Minister said.
“Candidates need to discuss issues of national importance with a clear set of polices and vision for the nation.
“Instead many, particularly some former leaders, are dropping down to attacking personalities and spreading rumours.
“Our country deserves strong policy platforms from those aspiring to form government, not hollow statements and foolish claims.
‘Start being realistic’
“The candidates who are now part of one-and-two-man parties have to start being realistic.
“You have Sir Mekere [Morauta] saying he will be PM, and so is Don Polye, and Sam Basil, and all the others, but one-and-two is a long way from 56.”
The Prime Minister said he has no intention of debating with any aspirant PM if they could not demonstrate that they had the support of enough opposition members.
“I am not going to waste my time debating someone who does not have the support to potentially lead a parliamentary majority.
“If one of these opposition leaders gets the backing of their counterparts to be the opposition’s candidate for prime minister, they will get their debate.
“If Ben Micah, Patrick Pruaitch, and Belden Namah, and all the other leaders come out and say publicly they are supporting Don Polye, or another leader, they will get their debate.
“But while they are a loose gaggle of dividend group of rivals, this will not happen.”
Western eyes ‘a mistake’
The Prime Minister said the mistake some commentators made was to look at the PNG election through Western eyes.
“In Australia, historically opposition leaders are often just a few seats away from forming government.
“In Papua New Guinea, the Opposition Leader is more than 50 seats away from forming government.
“The same goes for Mekere, he is just one of the 3000 plus candidates in this election.
“He has no party support, he is yesterday’s man who abandoned his own party that he founded. He has no principles or loyalty, so why would any of the opposition leaders want to follow him?”
The Prime Minister thanked Manus for the hospitality they extended to the PNC delegation and promised them that Charlie Benjamin and Job Pomat would work hard for Manus and further improve lives.
“Manus has huge potential in tourism and fisheries, and has the potential to keep advancing.
“A lot has changed in Manus over the past five years, and communities are economically stronger than in decades past.
“We must keep changing Manus, we must keep staying strong and deliver an even stronger economy for our nation and for provinces like Manus.”
]]>Pasifika youth looking for ‘inspiration’ in politics, says Auckland councillor
AsiaPacificReport.nz
Hele Ikimotu talks to Pasifika youth about whether they are voting in upcoming general elections in a vox pops video.
By Hele Ikimotu in Auckland
The lack of Pasifika youth voting every election year is because of a lack of Pacific representation in politics, says Manukau Ward councillor Fa’anana Efeso Collins.
Fa’anana, who was elected earlier this year in the local body elections, said there were many factors as to why young Pacific voters lacked in numbers when general elections came around.
A post-study election by the TNS New Zealand Ltd in 2014 found that seven percent of participants had a poor or very poor understanding of the voting process.
Many of that seven percent had a Pacific background.
“I don’t think they feel inspired by politics – we need people who inspire movement, who inspire change, who inspire something good and hopeful,” Fa’anana said.
He said politicians needed to personify hope and trust.
“I think that’s the kind of leadership our people are looking for, so you’re not going to have participation. If we can get those messages out I think we’re going to see an increase naturally in our people voting.
‘Espousing hope’
“If you look at the Pasifika politicians we have in National government at the moment – they’re not the kind of people who you’re going to jump up and down over.”
Fa’anana added: “I think if we can get politicians to espouse that level of hope, then I think we’re going to see people want to participate.”
Manukau Ward councillor Fa’anana Efeso Collins … Pasifika youth voting low due to “lack of Pacific representation”. Image: Tagata PasifikaThe study by TNS New Zealand Ltd also found that 36 percent of the participants who did not know what channels to use for enrolling were of Pasifika descent.
Auckland University of Technology student Antonia Swann said she was planning to vote this year.
“I think it’s important that if you have a voice, you should use it, especially if you’re passionate about the issues that this country is facing.”
The 20-year-old said Pasifika youth should use their democratic right: “In some countries you can’t vote if you’re a certain age or a particular gender so if you have the opportunity to vote, you should.”
In the 2014 general elections, 37.27 percent of 18 to 24-year-olds who were enrolled did not vote.
‘Change the government’
Fa’anana reflected: “I think we’ve got to put up the right people and say to young people – here’s the kind of person you want.
“Imagine the change, imagine if our people did vote, we would change the government.”
Hele Ikimotu is a Niuean and Banaban-Gilbertese student journalist on his final year of a Bachelor of Communication Studies, majoring in journalism, at Auckland University of Technology.
]]>‘This isn’t Aleppo. This is Marawi City’ – urban war in Philippines
AsiaPacificReport.nz
Aerial shot from a drone of Banggolo and Bubonga barangays in Marawi City taken on 8 June 2017 shows the destruction and fire from intense fighting between government troops and the Maute group and other rebels. Video: Val Cuenca/ABS-CBN
By Mong Palatino in Manila
On 23 May 2017, a group with alleged links to ISIS attacked some parts of Marawi City on the southern Philippine island of Mindanao. In response, the government declared martial law in Mindanao to pursue the attackers and prevent the spread of ISIS in other towns.
The clash between the military and the militant group known as Maute forced the mass evacuation of Marawi residents. As of June 7, more than 46,000 families, or 220,000 persons, have been displaced from their homes.
The government said it has provided 33 evacuation centers, but these could only shelter 18,000 people.
After three weeks of being a battle zone, hundreds of houses and other buildings in Marawi were destroyed. The extent of the damage has been revealed with rescuers, residents, and journalists uploading photos and videos of Marawi’s town proper.
The Maute group is blamed for the destruction, but the military is also being held accountable because of its continuous airstrikes. The military claimed it is conducting “surgical bombing” operations, but some residents said the air bombs are being dropped indiscriminately.
Marawi Mayor Majul Gandamra is saddened by the destruction in his city:
I weep for all the civilians who were mercilessly killed, I weep for the lost homes of my people and I weep for the loss of the true essence of Islam in the people who caused all these destructions to our lives and properties.
As of May 30, the government said 19 civilians had been killed by terrorists.
It is ordinary civilians who are enduring the greatest suffering as the crisis continues to drag on. And even if the clashes end soon, rehabilitating Marawi is expected to be a more difficult task because of the destruction caused by the fighting between the military and the militants.
Below are photos showing the situation in Marawi today:
“This is not Aleppo. This is Marawi City,” wrote TV reporter Greg Cahiles. Image: Greg Cahiles/Global Voices Destroyed buildings in the town proper of Marawi City. Image: Maulana Mamutuk/Global Voices Soldiers conducting a clearing operation in Marawi. Image: Najib Zacaria/Global Voices A deserted street in what used to be a busy intersection in Marawi. Image: Maulana Mamutuk/Global Voices A covered court converted into a temporary evacuation centre In Marawi City. Some residents are seen lining up to receive relief goods from the local government. Image: Marawi City local governmentMong Palatino is a Global Voices correspondent and is a two-term member of the Philippine House of Representatives. He has been blogging since 2004 at mongster’s nest.
]]>Paris climate change pact ‘not enough to save us’, warns Fiji PM
AsiaPacificReport.nz
By Nasik Swami in Suva
Current national contributions by countries to the Paris Agreement on climate change are not enough to save the Pacific, says Fiji’s Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama.
“We have to try to persuade the rest of the world to embrace even more ambitious action in the years to come, because we all know that even the current national contributions to the Paris Agreement are not enough to save us,” he said, addressing Pacific leaders as the UN Oceans Conference came to a close in New York last week.
As the incoming president of COP23, Bainimarama called on the Pacific and its leaders to stand by him and demand decisive action, as climate change was an issue of critical importance to the region’s collective future.
“I want your input. I need your input. And I want every Pacific leader beside me as we demand decisive action to protect the security of our people and those in other vulnerable parts of the world.”
Bainimarama also outlined his worry that America’s decision to abandon the Paris Agreement may also encourage other nations to either back away from the commitments they have made or not implement them with the same resolve.
“We are all, quite naturally, bitterly disappointed by the decision of the Trump Administration to abandon the Paris Agreement,” he said.
“Not only because of the loss of American leadership on this issue of critical importance to the whole world, but because it may also encourage other nations to either back away from the commitments they have made or not implement them with the same resolve.
“But something wonderful is also happening. The American decision is galvanising opinion around the world in support of decisive climate action.
‘Widespread rebellion’
“Other nations and blocs like China, the European Union and India are stepping forward to assume the leadership that Donald Trump has abandoned. And within America itself, there is a widespread rebellion against the decision the President has taken.”
Bainimarama said dozens of American state governors and city mayors were banding together with leaders of the private sector, civil society and ordinary citizens to redouble their efforts to meet this challenge.
“So while the Trump Administration may have abandoned its leadership on climate change, the American people haven’t.
“Next week, I will go to California to meet the Democrat Governor Jerry Brown and sign up to the climate action initiative that he is spearheading. I am also in contact with his Republican predecessor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, who shares Governor Brown’s commitment.
“The point is that on both sides of American politics, we have friends who are standing with us in this struggle. And I am inviting both Governor Brown and the famous ‘Terminator’ to come to our pre-COP gathering in Fiji in October, where we hope they will join us in a gesture of solidarity with the vulnerable just before COP23 itself in Bonn the following month.”
The Paris Agreement, which Fiji has ratified, sets out a global action plan to put the world on track to avoid dangerous climate change by limiting global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius.
Nasik Swami is a reporter with The Fiji Times
Climate change ‘defining issue for the world’, says Labour MP
AsiaPacificReport.nz
Hele Ikimotu checks out Auckland responses to climate change in a vox pops video.
By Hele Ikimotu in Auckland
Pasifika youth should be more engaged with climate change, says a Labour MP.
Labour’s Pacific Island Affairs spokesperson Su’a William Sio … on a “fact finding” climate change visit to Kiribati in March last year. Image: Su’a William SioWith the damaging effects of climate change increasing, Labour spokesperson for Pacific Island Affairs Su’a William Sio says it is important for young Pasifika people to be aware of the issue.
“As Pacific people, we will have a sympathetic view towards the Pacific and can advocate strongly for the rest of New Zealand to look at the Pacific with humanitarian eyes.”
He said young people were in an advantageous position to be aware of climate change.
“They’ve got strengths and talents that they can use in telling the climate change story, which will have an impact on the rest of the world.
“This is a defining issue for the world and it’s an issue that future generations are going to have to deal with.”
According to NASA, sea levels have risen by about 20.32 cm since the beginning of the 20th century.
Climate change awareness
The areas most affected by climate change include Fiji, Kiribati and Tuvalu.
A report by the Pacific-Australia Climate Change Science and Adaptation Planning Programme (PACCSAP) estimated that by 2100, sea levels would rise by 20-60cm in Pacific Island countries.
Su’a said it was mainly the government’s responsibility to raise awareness.
“Ultimately governments have the power and resources to drive the issue. It should be included as part and parcel of our educational curriculum,” he said.
In March, Fonua, a play framed around climate change showcased at the Mangere Arts Centre as part of the Auckland Arts Festival and further enabled people to understand the realities of climate change, organisers said.
“It was a Polynesian response to climate change – we just wanted to bring awareness around it,” Fonua‘s artistic director Jase Manumu’a said.
Manumu’a said the show ultimately brought the Pacific Island community together to understand how detrimental climate change was.
Climate change ‘topical’
Professor Geoffrey Craig, head of research within Auckland University’s of Technology’s (AUT) School of Communication Studies, said climate change was a topical issue that people needed to be aware of.
Also a former environmental journalist, Dr Craig said a lot of people saw climate change as a “frightening issue”, but that it was starting to become more active.
“Issues relating to the environment are going to be hitting home now over the next few decades. So the people who are going to be really affected by it are young people,” he said.
Hele Ikimotu is a Niuean and Banaban-Gilbertese student journalist on his final year of a Bachelor of Communication Studies, majoring in journalism, at Auckland University of Technology.
]]>Pacific Journalism Monographs No. 6: Watching Our Words: Perceptions of self-censorship and media freedom in Fiji
Pacific Media Centre


Ricardo Morris
ISBN/code: 978-1-927184-44-8
Price: $15.00
Publication date: Wednesday, May 17, 2017
Publisher: Pacific Media Centre
Ricardo Morris, a journalist and Thomson Reuters fellow from Fiji, has studied the perceptions and practice of self-censorship among journalists from his country in the years following the military coup in December 2006.
He focused particularly on the period after the 2014 general election that returned Fiji to democratic rule.
In his research paper, Morris examines how willing Fiji’s media workers are to self-censor, how self-censorship works in newsrooms, and what factors are influential on journalists’ work.
The research report was first published by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism and has been published by the Pacific Journalism Monograph series at the Pacific Media Centre by arrangement with the author and institute.
Morris is the founder, publisher and editor of independent media company Republika Media Limited in Fiji, which publishes the magazine Repúblika.
How traditional and social media will impact on PNG elections
AsiaPacificReport.nz
ANALYSIS: By Jess Hopkinson and Holly Driscoll
Social media is a new phenomenon which enables easy and instant access to voters. Papua New Guinea’s freedom of information is #51 on the Paris-based Reporters Without Border’s World Freedom Index and this study investigates traditional sources, social media and independent blogging websites to determine where a voter can locate quality information.
The Papua New Guinea general election which begins next week has been impacted on by social media and provides a community platform for voters to express their opinions, and share news not found in traditional media.
This has aided voters because they are able learn more about the candidates. It has also disadvantaged voters because PNG journalism does use any recognised fact-checking mediums to confirm information and this leads to an ill-informed public.
There is no one completely trustworthy source of information which voters can depend on. This essay will firstly determine how this research was conducted.
Secondly, there is an abundance of candidates campaigning for this election and social media helps people learn about their policies and promises. Next, this upcoming election needs to be conducted fairly and freely so that people’s votes are counted. However, PNG does acknowledge corruption in government.
Finally, we include information gathered from interviews with local identities to determine that social media positively and negatively impacts the election.
Papua New Guinea’s elections are not regarded widely as democratically fair and free. Currently, PNG has many democratic features. It has a unicameral parliament, a Prime Minister who is the head of the elected party, a preferential voting system and conducts regular elections.
Encouraging free and fair process
The government is attempting to encourage a free and fair election process. For example, during the voting period electoral officer’s wages must be paid directly into their bank accounts rather than carrying bags of money around.
This aims to make it more difficult for officers to take bribes and for candidates to enter extra ballots and corrupt the results. This means that each individual vote gets to be counted, making the election free and fair. Former Prime Minister Sir Mekere Morauta said: “It is also important to ensure that the conduction of the election itself is free and fair and that electoral systems and processes are transparent.”
If an election is not democratic, it can breed corruption and mismanagement into the nation because votes are not counted properly and an individual can exploit the election. Currently, candidates visit voters’ homes and hand out goods such as money, food or a carton of beer to win votes.
The voters will not see the candidates again until the next election. Citizens are voting according to the free goods they are receiving instead of the policies which candidates support.
The culture of PNG elections is not focused on the future but rather immediate benefits that candidates give. PNG is aiming to improve the free and fairness within the upcoming elections however candidates are still trading goods for votes instead of good policies.
This report researches a multitude of sources of information to conclude where voters can find quality information for the upcoming election. We interviewed local Papua New Guineans to provide insight of how social media has affected the election and compares with traditional media sources.
Facebook pages are used “to educate our people about the difference between politicians and the consequences of not voting wisely”, said Northern Governor Gary Juffa, himself a major user of social media (May 25).
Community of voters
Facebook offers a community of voters who are invested in a democratic election and provides information and connections with thousands of people. In measuring the growing impact of the use of social media, we interviewed PNG locals to understand the positives and negatives of social media.
The National newspaper and the Post-Courier are two of Papua New Guinea’s top selling news sources, with The National a major advantage over its opponent’s circulation. We regularly checked these sites to gather data.
Printing presses located in Port Moresby and Lae on the opposite side of the country, enable faster distribution by road instead of expensive air freight.
However, internet usage in PNG has been increasing since 2000 from 44,887, to a predicted 906,695 users in 2016. Social media such as Facebook and Twitter provide instant news to a growing number of users and therefore are serious contenders to local newspapers who are now uploading information online.
We also collaborated information from independent blogs such as Keith Jackson & Friends: PNG Attitude and PNG Blogs. Independent blogs were essential to our research as they highlighted articles which are noticeably absent on traditional new sites.
These are popular among voters as there are always hundreds of comments and they are often linked to the platform of Facebook. Gathering information from social media, traditional sources and independent blogs has provided a wealth of information on the upcoming election.
One of the primary difficulties faced by voters in the elections in PNG is the sheer volume of candidates vying for seat. Of the 44 political parties who will be contesting for the 111 seats in Parliament, there are “2614 candidates (preliminary figure) nominated nationwide.”
In some areas of PNG, such as the Eastern Highlands province, there are 396 candidates.
Impossible for understanding
With so many candidates running for seats, voters are not able to make fully informed decisions when casting their votes as it is near impossible to develop a comprehensive understanding of each candidate and the policies they are arguing for.
However, social media allows candidates instant, rapid and easy access to share policies, promises and their personalities with voters. Paul Barker (2017) confirmed that social media is being used this election.
“Candidates and parties are devoting a fair bit of attention to the social media, as well as media and on the ground publicity,” he said.
There are still too many candidates for voters to follow. With each candidate attempting to gain attention, promises made in the run up to the election have become increasingly esoteric.
“Plenty promise to end corruption, build sealed roads and bring services to remote communities, things for which there is simply no money and sometimes no economic justification”, says ABC correspondent Eric Tlozek.
The upcoming election has 2614 candidates rallying for votes and social media is providing a platform for candidates to stand out
Social media has impacted the 2017 election and this provides both positive and negative outcomes. Locals who were interviewed agreed that social media was gaining traction among voters.
Post-Courier journalist Gorethy Kenneth said: “It is the first election where almost every party is using social media. The opposition have been using it to promote themselves and kick up controversy and the current government uses it to promote their achievements”.
Northern Province Governor Gary Juffa also says: “Social media is going to have a huge impact. It’s helping people learn and communicate far more effectively than ever before”.
Influence ‘marginal’
Countering this, Dr Susan Merrell said: ‘’I believe social media will eventually have a profound impact on issues such as elections. Now, I think the influence is marginal”.
Various ways social media benefit voters in the election includes that it creates easy and quick access for individuals with internet and voters are able to join established communities on Facebook such as PNG News, Media Monitors and The Voice of PNG.
In these Facebook groups, people are regularly documenting the progress of the election, giving their opinions on the happenings of government and traditional media and informing voters on what the media has missed.
An example of this occurred on the Media Monitors Facebook Page.
“So no official protests about PNG journalists being banned from the Australian PM’s press conference? The silence is deafening,” Bob Howarth, a former Post-Courier editor-in-chief, wrote on April 9.
A commentor extended this thought with, “If PNG media is banned that’s an insult to our sovereignty as a country”.
From this point community members work together to uncover why this happened.
Alexander Rheeney, president of the PNG Media Council, had messaged local media stations to learn why journalists were not present at the conference. Only one news organisation replied.
“The single response from the Post-Courier did not constitute a quorum that would have compelled the council to act on their behalf”, said Rheeney, a former editor-in-chief of the Post-Courier on April 24.
Neglected issues in traditional media
Throughout the networks that Facebook creates it uncovers issues that traditional media is neglecting. Independent blog sites also reported on the banning of local journalists during the Australian Prime Minister’s visit.
The benefits of social media is that it is an easily accessible network of people who provide information and can clarify information.
Despite the benefits there is criticism that social media can lead to an ill-informed public.
Information is being spread rapidly and is not always accurate.
Rheeney said: “Both traditional media and new media in PNG continue to experience quality control issues leading to media organisations broadcasting and publishing incorrect information.”
There are currently no media which news articles or opinions are processed through. This allows articles to enter the public which are not legitimate or do not investigate issues thoroughly.
There is no one reliable source of information for voters to gather information. The current solution is for a voter to read from difference sources for political information such as social media and traditional news sources.
Dr Susan Merrell says: “I find that relying on only one is no good – you need a variety.”
Ill-informed voters ‘dangerous’
An ill-informed voter is dangerous. They may not see the benefits of voting at all or may miss the chance of voting for a leader who supports their goals or they’ve voted according to bias media, says Dr Joseph McMurray.
This means that there are wrong votes or none at all entering the election. As social media becomes a source of information for the election, it cannot be guaranteed to be accurate and a voter must consume information from multiple sources.
The social media phenomenon has introduced a new facet of information for Papua New Guinean voters for the upcoming election. The PNG election is currently battling corruption to become more democratic, the former Prime Minister has acknowledged that the election process is corrupt.
PNG is implementing reforms to create free and fairness applicable to the upcoming election. This makes freedom of information to the public essential as they need to know what is happening to their vote.
This essay gathered information from an assembly of sources including traditional media, social media sites, independent bloggers and PNG locals.
It was discovered that social media provided a platform for voters to gain information about their candidates, however it is unlikely for any voter to make an informed decision because there just too many candidates for them to gain a good understanding of their policies.
There are many benefits to a functioning social media community. This includes a network of people prepared to learn about issues which the traditional media has missed. Most people have said that social media is a great place to gather information and that it is gaining popularity.
No completely trusted
However, it is not to be completely trusted. Any article can be posted to traditional and social media websites without having to pass through any fact-checking mediums.
This is dangerous as individuals can be ill-informed and repercussions include people not voting or voting for the wrong person.
Therefore, until there are media for articles to be processed through there is no one accurate source to locate information. It is essential for voters to read a range of information to be well-informed.
Jess Hopkinson and Holly Driscoll are Community Volunteer Interns in Law/Communication at Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus.
The source list is abridged and embedded in the article. Interviews:
Barker, P 2017, PNG Interview, May 1.
Juffa, G 2017, PNG Interview, May 25.
Kenneth, G 2017, PNG Interview, May 2.
Merrel, S 2017, PNG Interview, May 28.
Rheeney, A 2017, PNG Interview, April 24.
Ex-Treasurer backs probe into LPG non-payments, slams ‘negligence’
AsiaPacificReport.nz
Prime Minister Peter O’Neill campaigns for his People’s National Congress (PNC) candidates contesting in the 2017 National Elections in the Highlands this week. Video: EMTV News
By Charles Yapumi in Port Moresby
Papua New Guinea’s former Treasury Minister has welcomed the Estimates Committee of the Australian Senate’s probe into non-payment of royalties to LNG area landowners.
“It is pleasing to see the concern expressed by Senator Scott Ludlam for the plight of LNG project landowners who have not received any royalty payments three years after annual exports worth billions of dollars have commenced,” said Patrick Pruaitch, leader of the National Alliance Party.
Pruaitch was dumped as Treasurer by Prime Minister Peter O’Neill last month after claiming the economy was “falling off a cliff”.
Senator Ludlam expressed concern at a recent meeting that the Australian government’s Export Finance Insurance Corporation (EFIC) had not taken measures to ensure royalty payments — now totalling K904 million (about NZ$420 million) — had been distributed to landowners in the PNG LNG project area.
He noted that the loan to the PNG LNG project was the biggest ever foreign loan made by the Australian government.
“While the inquiry highlighted EFIC’s silence and non-action towards protecting Australia’s interest, more significantly for PNG, it raises the government’s negligence and lack of responsibility to the people of PNG, specifically the wellhead landowners and beneficiary groups in the PNG LNG project,” Pruaitch said.
“By right, the clan-vetting exercise to determine the rightful people to whom royalties should be paid should have been completed well before the first LNG shipment left PNG’s shores in May 2014.
“The O’Neill government has to date failed to resolve this issue,” Pruaitch said.
Landowner patience running out
Senator Ludlam was right in expressing fears about project risk because the patience of landowners has been running out.
“I thank Senator Scott Ludlam for his courageous position in seeking EFIC’s explanations as to why the Australian export credit agency that financed the mega LNG project in Papua New Guinea had, to date, not initiated at the very least a telephone conversation between the Australian Foreign Minister and PNG officials to raise the concern about non-payment of PNG LNG project royalties to project area landowners.”
Pruaitch was the former Treasurer in the Somare government in 2009, and was also the chairman of the Ministerial Sub-committee on Economic Matters responsible for the delivery of the PNG LNG project.
“The senator’s probe has highlighted the fact that international companies also have a corporate responsibility to adhere to international principles and best practices and EFIC should also do its part to protect Australia’s investment while, at the same time, honouring the letter and spirit of the project agreement.”
Charles Yapumi is a Loop PNG reporter.
]]>Joey Tau: Can the MSG bloc walk out on the PACER-Plus trade deal?
AsiaPacificReport.nz
ANALYSIS: By Joey Tau in Suva
Vanuatu is the latest Melanesian state to express reservations on the Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations (PACER) agreement between members of the Pacific Islands Forum (the Forum Island Countries plus Australia and New Zealand), PACER-Plus.
The Vanuatu government announced last week that it will not sign the PACER Plus agreement and has decided to pull out of the signing tomorrow after its Council of Ministers’ called for more time to assess the benefits of the regional agreement for Vanuatu.
The decision by Vanuatu comes as no surprise as other Melanesian states, including Papua New Guinea, decided last year that it would not be taking part in the PACER-Plus negotiations, nor would it sign the finalised instruments.
Fiji later followed with threats that it would not sign the agreement as there was lack of flexibility from Australia and New Zealand.
Vanuatu shares similar concerns with both PNG and Fiji on possible loss from such an agreement, the need for an impact assessment, and the protection of infant industries.
PNG walks out early
When PNG sent warning bells in March last year that the PACER-Plus negotiations looked shaky and needed more time for consultation, it had a list of concerns and was ready to talk with both Australia and New Zealand.
-Partners-
But it was during that time that PNG had reached a resolution to withdraw from PACER-Plus.
In August, Prime Minister Peter O’Neill announced the country would disengage with regional negotiations, stressing that based on assessments PACER-Plus would be a disadvantage for its economy.
With attempts by Australia and New Zealand to persuade PNG to return to the regional trade talks, O’Neill stood firm on the country’s assessments, saying, “PNG will not be signing as it would be a net-loss to the PNG economy.”
PNG’s Trade Minister Richard Maru nailed the country’s position when pressured at bilateral meetings, adding that any trade agreement with Australia, New Zealand and other Pacific Islands, that reduced employment, and “killed” the manufacturing industry by removing tariffs and duty would not be acceptable in PNG.
“How many times will I make it clear to Australia and New Zealand that Papua New Guinea will not sign the Pacer-Plus agreement that seeks to advance Australia and New Zealand’s commercial interest at the expense of our national interest” Maru said.
“We are not signing PACER-Plus in its current form because the move to remove tariff and duty will kill our manufacturing sector.”
The furious Maru later called out the Australian government, saying “we will not sign and we will not listen to anyone. I’ve made that very clear … my message to Australia is stop sending any of your agents to PNG and start talking about a comprehensive partnership agreement with us.”
Fiji left unhappy
Last September, Fiji threatened to walk away from the regional trade agreement negotiation after its concerns were not addressed.
The country’s Trade Minister, Faiyaz Koya, said there was a lack of flexibility from Australia and New Zealand on Fiji and Pacific Islands key concerns.
During a RNZ international interview, Minister Koya emphasised that Fiji wanted further negotiations on two very critical issues, on infant industry protection and the “most-favoured-nation” clause that would have an implication for Fiji’s development aspirations.
Fiji’s call for more time to negotiate its concerns was ignored when the Office of the Chief Trade Advisor (OCTA) hastened the process and concluded negotiations in April in Australia, thus leaving Fiji out of the final talks.
The April conclusion also ignored Fiji’s appeal for a deferral due to conflicting schedules.
“Fiji hadn’t opted out of PACER-Plus, we remain committed … but we were excluded from the Brisbane meeting,” said Minister Koya.
Final negotiations criticised
After eight years of negotiations, PACER-Plus was concluded in Australia in April this year. This regional trade agreement is said to enhance the economic development of Pacific island countries through greater regional trade and economic integration with Australia and New Zealand.
But it has been severely criticised as burdensome on Pacific bureaucracies and undermining Pacific Island countries’ ability to support their local economies.
This week the 13 countries participating will sign the agreement in Nuku’alofa, Tonga.
The fear is that 11 island states will agree and sign a poorly designed agreement locking in Australia and New Zealand as winners.
What has been concluded is a deal with no guaranties of benefits from labour mobility and only a promise of 5 years of aid money, but undermines the ability of the Pacific to determine for themselves what development is and the tools to pursue Pacific development aspirations.
The 13 countries participating in PACER-Plus are Australia, Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Kiribati, Nauru, New Zealand, Niue, Palau, Republic of Marshall Islands, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga and Tuvalu.
Realities for Solomon Islands
The Solomon Islands has a choice to decide whether or not it will sign on to PACER-Plus.
It would have similar concerns expressed by its fellow Melanesian comrades. But it is a choice between letting Australia and New Zealand impose their development vision via PACER-Plus or the opportunity to have a development that reflects the reality and possibilities in the Solomon Islands.
A report by Solomon Islands to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in November last year summed up the economic impact under PACER-Plus as “increased imports from developed country partners are likely to exceed the modest increase in Solomon Islands’ exports, due to the extent of liberalisation demanded by the aforementioned parties and limited productive capacity in the domestic economy. The short term adjustment and implementation costs are likely to impose significant economic and political pressures.”
Australia is currently the number one source of imports for the Solomon Islands, a situation that will be further entrenched under PACER-Plus. The increase in imports from Australia and New Zealand will really be felt when Solomon Islands is set to reduce import taxes on at least 80 percent of imports from these countries.
While this won’t come into effect until the Solomon Islands graduates from Least-Developed Country status – if it passes the 2018 evaluation then graduation will be likely in 2021 – resulting in a loss of US$11million from government revenue.
Solomon Islands had recommended to the WTO that it saw itself aligning with the Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) in preference to Australia and New Zealand in the future, and PACER-Plus could have them on the wrong path if they sign up.
PACER-Plus will have a serious impact on the ability for Solomon Islanders to determine for themselves their own development future.
Joey Tau is media and campaigns officer of the Suva-based Pacific Network on Globalisation.
]]>‘We shouldn’t rest on our laurels,’ warn NZ nuclear free activists
AsiaPacificReport.nz
By Kendall Hutt in Auckland
As international talks at the United Nations on the ban of nuclear weapons draw closer, New Zealand nuclear free and peace activists warn there is a lot of work to be done before the world will be safe from a nuclear war.
“We’ve still got a lot of work to do in the world,” Auckland Mayor Phil Goff reflected at Devonport’s Depot Artspace during a weekend event organised by the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF) Aotearoa and Devonport Peace Group.
Their warning comes as New Zealand celebrates 30 years since the country’s Nuclear Free Zone, Disarmament and Arms Control Act came into force on 8 June 1987.
Described as a “David versus Goliath” stand by Pacific Media Centre director Professor David Robie, the Act and the “grassroots, groundswell” movement behind it, saw New Zealand become the first Western nation to legislate to be nuclear free.
Goff said: “The Lange Labour government came along with the courage and the commitment, first of all to say to a powerful ally: ‘No, we are not going to go along with the nuclear umbrella. No, we are not going to support your possession of nuclear weapons.
“We are a small nation, but we are a proud and independent nation and we are going to make our country nuclear free’. And we did,” Goff said.
-Partners-
Maire Leadbeater of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament said: “Everything was against us, but we did it.”
‘Ahead of the game’
However, it was also important to remember the Pacific’s contribution to New Zealand’s anti-nuclear campaign, said Dr Robie.
Not only did this come through the fact that the Pacific was “ahead of the game” – Palau, Vanuatu, and Tahiti’s largest municipality, the airport suburb of Fa’aa, declaring themselves nuclear free – but also through opposition to French nuclear testing.
Professor David Robie on nuclear testing in Pacific … “please don’t spoil my beautiful face”. Image: Kendall Hutt/PMCAs revealed in John Pilger’s latest documentary The Coming War On China, Dr Robie said, the “total yield of the nuclear experiments on and around the Marshall Islands was equal to 7200 Hiroshima bombs, meaning the equivalent of more than one Hiroshima bomb was exploded in the area every day for 12 years.”
He also said: “The French committed shameful acts in defence of nuclear colonialism” — such as the 1985 assassination of Kanak leader Eloi Machoro and the 1988 Ouvea cave massacre of 19 young militants.
But the “reunion”, as Goff himself described it, of many of the activists who were on the frontlines of New Zealand’s nuclear free movement, was ultimately overshadowed by apparent inaction by “nuclear states” over nuclear disarmament.
Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament’s Maire Leadbeater … “things haven’t changed”. Image: Kendall Hutt/PMC“We fought the battle in New Zealand, we made a mark on the international stage, we told the powerful and the strong that we would stand up for ourselves and we would stand by our values. But our world has not become a safer place. If anything, it has become a less safe place,” he said.
Leadbeater said: “Things really haven’t changed in terms of the international scene.”
‘Still much work to be done’
WILPF Aotearoa’s president Megan Hutching also reflected:
“We should not rest on the laurels of the 1987 Nuclear Free Zone, Disarmament and Arms Control Act because there is still much work to be done before we can live in a safe, nuclear weapons free world.”
This is due to the fact there are currently 15,000 nuclear warheads in the world, Goff said.
Of greater concern still, he said, was countries such as North Korea joining the nuclear arms race.
Auckland Mayor Phil Goff 30 years on … “we still live in a very dangerous world”. Image: Kendall Hutt/PMC“Alongside the five nuclear weapon states we’ve had India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea all gain possession of nuclear weapons and the missile systems to launch them.”
Leadbeater said the world was still living in fear of a “nuclear war by accident”.
“We still live in a very dangerous world… The world is crying out for so many other important needs. It’s a shameful thing and a dangerous, dangerous thing.”
Youth involvement needed
In light of this, many of the activists reflected it was time for New Zealand’s youth to pick up the baton, although it would be a challenge, they acknowledged.
“The greatest challenge is trying to get the youth to continue with the struggles so that we can pass on the baton to them, especially in the nuclear movement” said Fijian peace activist and researcher Ema Tagicakibau from the Nuclear Free and Independent Pacific (NFIP) movement.
“In that, the challenge remains and the struggle continues.”
“Things are just as serious as they ever were, but we don’t unfortunately have that same sort of momentum among the community,” Leadbeater said.
Visual Artists Against Nuclear Arms (VAANA) member Margaret Lawlor Bartlett reflected: “We need a group of young, dedicated anti-nuclear people.”
The youth of today, however, do provide a sense of hope for the future, Leadbeater concluded, reflecting the general feeling of many in the room.
“In remembering these great times and the wonderful excitement of so many other people, let us hope that it does strengthen us to carry on and to perhaps now take our leadership from the young and find ways to carry on.”
The United Nations conference to negotiate a nuclear weapons ban will continue on June 15 until July 7.
]]>Cartoons: Malcolm Evans on 50th anniversary of 1967 Israeli war and Palestinian occupation
AsiaPacificReport.nz
Malcolm Evans reflects on the price of the half of the century of Israeli occupation Palestinian territory and illegal settlements in defiance of the United Nations since the Six-Day War in 1967. The 50th anniversary was last week between June 5 and 10.
]]>Panguna women landowners say BCL didn’t consult and ‘isn’t welcome’
AsiaPacificReport.nz
Pacific Media Watch News Desk
Women in Central Bougainville and landowners of the Panguna copper mine site are opposing the reopening of the mine.
A delegation of Autonomous Region of Bougainville Government (ABG) representatives, who conducted a mining forum in Panguna and Arawa last week, was met with stiff opposition from locals, reports Loop PNG.
In Panguna, Regina Eremari, a landowner who represents the grassroots women of the area, said ABG leaders were not considering the voice of the women.
“We women are the custodians and landowners of the land, not the men. In the past, it was the men who the led and spoilt our land and environment through mining, which resulted in the Bougainville Crisis,” she said tearfully.
“When Bougainville Copper Limited mined our land, we were displaced and placed in settlements, and still live in these settlements today. Our gardening grounds were destroyed.
“Now where will they put us if they want to mine the land again? Because most of us have moved back to where the mining once operated and have made our homes in and around the mining pit area.”
-Partners-
She also called for ABG to be transparent with decisions that involve mining, because Bougainville is still in the early stages of the peace process and there are so many outstanding issues that still have to be dealt with.
In the Arawa forum, women leader Lynette Ona questioned the ABG members present about which landowners they had consulted with to claim that Panguna landowners had agreed to open the Panguna mine under BCL.
“I am a landowner and my land is right in the centre of the Panguna mine pit and no one has consulted with me for my land to be dug up. And my stance is ‘No Mining, No BCL!’”
“BCL is not welcome to come and dig up my land again, never!” she said.
The delegation, led by Vice-President and Minister for Minerals and Energy Resource Raymond Masono and Director Office of Panguna Mine Negotiation Bruno Babato, included Minister for Economic and Trade Development Fidelis Semoso, Minister for Autonomy Implementation Albert Punghau, Minister for Finance and Treasury Robin Wilson, DPI Minister Nicholas Darku, Minister for Education Thomas Pa’ataku, Secretary Department of Minerals and Energy Resources Shedrach Himata and their team.
Papua New Guinea will hold its 2017 General Election from June 24 to July 8.
Southern Cross: 30 years of N-free Aotearoa – Pacific leaders seek healthier oceans
AsiaPacificReport.nz
Pacific Media Watch News Desk
AUT Pacific Media Centre’s Pacific Media Watch freedom project editor Kendall Hutt speaks with 95bFM’s The Wire host Amanda Jane Robinson on the weekly radio programme Southern Cross about celebrating 30 years of a nuclear-free Aotearoa.
She was at Devonport’s Depot Artspace at the weekend to hear some inspiring speakers who led the Peace Squadron and the peace movement campaigning for a nuclear-free New Zealand.
Auckland mayor Phil Goff and activist photographers John Miller and Gil Hanly were there too.
Hutt also talks about Pacific leaders calling for healthier oceans at UN conference in Washington.
Images: NZ peace activists pay homage to 1987 nuclear-free law campaigners
AsiaPacificReport.nz
New Zealand peace activists gathered together at the weekend in Devonport — home of the country’s first “nuclear-free zone” — to pay homage to the “people’s” campaign for a nation without nukes.
The Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WIPLF) and the Devonport Peace Group organised the event, marking the 30th anniversary of the NZ Nuclear Free Zone, Disarmament, and Arms Control Act. This came into force on 8 June 1987.
The pictures were taken by the Pacific Media Centre’s Dr David Robie and Pacific Media Watch editor Kendall Hutt.
]]>Keith Rankin Analysis: British Tories surge; new Labour surges more
Headline: British Tories surge; new Labour surges more
Analysis by Keith Rankin
[caption id="attachment_14647" align="aligncenter" width="976"]
Record support in Britain for both Conservative and Labour. Graphic by Keith Rankin.[/caption]
[caption id="attachment_1450" align="alignleft" width="150"]
Keith Rankin.[/caption]
This month’s chart shows that the performance by the Tories in the UK election was not at all bad. With a 42.34 percent share the Tories performed dramatically better than they did just two years ago (36.82%). Their nadir was in 1997, at 30.69%. Labour, of course, surged even more, gaining a 39.99% vote share; a share that, in New Zealand, Andrew Little could only envy.
This swing away from the nationalist parties (UKIP and SNP) was always going to happen. The nationalist tide is going out, and the Tories are securely in power in the UK until 2022. Jeremy Corbyn – human being rather than Crosby/Textor robot – is already older than Michael Joseph Savage was when he became New Zealand’s Prime Minister. Corbyn will be 73 in 2022 and 78 in 2027; by no means too old (cf. Pope Francis) but nevertheless an unlikely Prime Minister from 2022. More importantly, Corbyn’s presence and prescience may help shift the locus of western politics away from the public-austerity hole that liberal-democracy fell into.
In the absence of proportional representation, the Brits are realising that it’s a waste of time voting for a candidate who can come, at best, third in a constituency contest. They are adopting DIY (do-it-yourself) preferential voting; as New Zealanders have done in Epsom and Ohariu. The LibDems won seats where they were genuine contestants, despite their share of the nationwide vote continuing to fall. Only in Scotland did Labour people refuse to support their sitting SNP representatives, allowing many of these constituencies to claimed by Tory candidates, thereby denying Labour a historic opportunity to form a government.
Who would have thought that Labour could ever win in Kensington and Canterbury? Who expected decayed Middlesbrough and Stoke to switch the other way, from Labour to Tory? Votes for no-hoper candidates dropped substantially. Millennials – Brits in their twenties – became participants in the democratic process; unlike, in the 2000s’ decade, the now 30-something children of the baby‑boomers. Unpolled (until the exit polls) millennials took their “don’t forget us” votes with them, from the grit of Staffordshire and Teesside to the squats of London.
The shift to two-party politics happened in Northern Ireland too, with Sinn Fein nearly doubling its number of stay-in-Ireland MPs. Thanks to Sinn Fein, there are now only 642 effective MPs (deducting 7 Sinn Fein, plus the Speaker). The Tories in England and Northern Ireland have 327 of those, with the maximum opposition tally being 315. If the DUP (Northern Ireland Tories) abstain from any vote, it’s still 317 to 315, enough for the Tories to keep governing. If on some socially liberal measure, the DUP vote against the UK Tories, then the required votes will be found elsewhere.
We in New Zealand have had stable minority governments since 2002. I see no reason why governance in the UK will be much different, despite a mainstream media that struggles to make sense of twenty-first century realities and insecurities.
In 2001 UK voter turnout was 59.4%; it’s now 68.7%. Then the Tory Conservatives gained only 18.8% of enrolled voters (Labour 24.2%). In 2010, when the only possible outcome was a Tory-led government, the Conservatives got just 23.5%; Labour only 18.9%. In 2017, however, the Conservatives got 29.1% of enrolled voters (Labour 27.5%).
I don’t see anything in the UK experience that suggests there will be a similar surge to Labour in New Zealand. Rather, all I can see is a pro-austerity anti-immigration platform, quota politics, a Green Party leaving the vacancy in the new-centre (the place where the Greens should be standing) to TOP (the new Opportunities Party), and an unwillingness from Labour to engage with the Māori Party.
The UK election was an interesting and positive portent for new politics in the 2020s. I expect New Zealand’s ‘really interesting’ election will be in 2020, not 2017. New Zealand needs new Labour, not ‘New Labour’.
]]>PNG police, forces launch Moresby security operation for elections
AsiaPacificReport.nz
The joint parade of disciplinary forces in Port Moresby at the weekend. Video: EMTV News
By Theckla Gunga in Port Moresby
A joint parade between members of Papua New Guinea’s three disciplinary forces has been conducted in Port Moresby to mark the launch of the election operation.
The launch at the weekend signified the commencement of the Joint Operations in the National Capital District and Central Divisional Command. At least 10 companies were part of the parade. It was a short parade from the back of the Boroko Police Station to the front car park.
The parade was led by members of the Royal Papua New Guinea Constabulary, followed by the Defence Force and Correctional Services.
Once the parade took their position, Deputy Police Commissioner in charge of operations Jim Andrews was invited by Head of the Command Sylvester Kalaut to review the parade.
Commissioner Andrews encouraged the members of the disciplinary forces to assist the Electoral Commission over security for the voters, candidates and election officials.
-Partners-
Although the 2017 National Election is conducted by the Electoral Commission, members of the three disciplinary forces have been engaged to ensure the elections are securely and safely conducted.
These officers will be providing security during the polling and counting periods, and in the remaining two weeks of campaign.
NCD and Central is the last command to launch its Natel Operation.
Similar operations were launched in the other divisional commands such as New Guinea Islands and Highlands divisional commands.
NCD and Central will go to the polls on June 27.
]]>Flashback to NZ’s nuclear-free law 1987: Challenging Goliath
AsiaPacificReport.nz
New Zealand quietly celebrated 30 years of its official status as a “nuclear-free” country this week when the nuclear-free zone law came into force on 8 June 1987. When Aotearoa/New Zealand banned nuclear warships from its ports in 1984, the country was seen as David standing up to Washington’s Goliath. But behind Prime Minister David Lange was a whole army of peace campaigners forcing him to sling his shot. David Robie traces the history of their resistance in a 1986 article for the New Internationalist – and shows how ordinary people declaring their home as a nuclear-free zone helped send a message to the superpowers.
Artist Debra Bustin sat dejectedly among the Ronald Reagan and Robert Muldoon masks, papier mâché missiles and effigies of babies in stakes, waiting. The “Nuclear Horror Show”, a dramatic piece of street theatre, was ready to roll – but there was no transport. The truck supposed to have carted the props to the start of the demonstration in the heart of Wellington had failed to turn up.
But another peace campaigner had an idea. He darted onto the nearby street and stopped the first empty truck.
“Hey mate, we’ve got to get all this stuff to the big anti-nuclear rally across town.” He said. “Can you help us?”
The New Internationalist “Pacific Peace” edition in 1986.Ten years earlier, the truck driver would have laughed at the campaigner’s cheek. However, this was September 1983, and the peace and anti-nuclear groups in Aotearoa/New Zealand had become a mass movement. The driver was delighted to help and the macabre show went ahead.
Within 10 months, conservative Prime Minister Sir Robert Muldoon had been swept out of office as David Lange and the Labour Party were catapulted into power on a nuclear-free platform, which stunned the country’s Western allies, particularly the United States.
Internationally, the move was perceived to be a bold, idealistic new step by a reformist government. Critics tried to suggest it was a result of some Machiavellian plot by the party’s “militant” left wing. In fact, it was the culmination of a policy that had first been introduced more than a decade earlier and had been reinforced at grassroots level by a highly motivated peace movement.
-Partners-
Indeed, even if the government itself had had doubts about the policy, it would have had little choice. Opinion polls showed 74 percent of people in favour of banning nuclear-armed ships, two-thirds of the country’s 3.2 million population lived in self-proclaimed “nuclear free zones” and four out of five competing political parties (including a new breakaway right-wing group) had the policy as part of their platforms.
Nuclear-free photographs by Gil Hanly and John Miller are on display in the 30th anniversary of the nuclear-free law at the Depot Artspace in Devonport. Image: David Robie/PMCGlobal peace lesson?
So what created this revolution in public opinion, and is there a lesson that the global peace movement can learn from Aotearoa’s example?
The peace movement in Aotearoa itself had humble beginnings in the 1960s with the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament’s (CND) local Easter rallies being miniature clones of the huge annual Aldermaston march in the UK. However, in 1968 two things combined to create the first major rallying point: The first was the screening of Peter Watkins’ anti-nuclear TV drama The War Game (which was initially censored in the UK in 1965 and eventually screened 20 years later in 1985). The second was the US Navy’s plan to build a radio communications base called Omega, which was to aid the navigation of Polaris submarines. Sensitised to the issue by the documentary, New Zealanders were so outraged by the Omega plan that it was forced to be shelved. “Government deals NZ into War Game,” said one newspaper.
“The Watkins film brought home to New Zealanders the possibility of the country being a nuclear target,” says peace researcher Owen Wilkes. “Until then war had been a kind of sporting event. It was something that happened on the other side of the world.”
Photographer John Miller, who along with Gil Hanly, has many pictures of the nuclear-free campaign on show at the Depot Artspace, Devonport. Image: David Robie/PMCAnti-nuclear feeling contributed to Labour’s election victory under Norman Kirk in 1972. Their nuclear-free policy emerged from the fallout shelter hysteria of the early 1960s, thermonuclear tests by the superpowers and the escalating Vietnam War. In the three heady years that followed, the Kirk government shut out nuclear-armed and powered ships from New Zealand’s ports. They also dispatched frigates in support of the vulnerable flotillas of yachts that sailed to Moruroa in protest at French nuclear testing there.
But then the nuclear-free strategy was dealt a body blow. The National Party was re-elected in 1975 and Muldoon ushered in his decade of power by welcoming back nuclear ships. The Peace Squadron was formed by Rev George Armstrong in response – a loose coalition of people whose yachts, small boats and other craft mounted spectacular waterborne protests against visiting nuclear ships.
Another focus for the Peace Movement was the creation of nuclear-free zones. “We campaigned to declare your house, dog, car and boat nuclear-free,” recalls Maire Leadbeater, spokesperson of CND. It seemed small fry at the time, but later it was realised what a clever strategy it had been. It gave peace activists a manageable goal while at the same time making elected councils take a stand against nuclear facilities visiting, or being sited in their area.”
Sparked off movement
Canadian émigré Larry Ross dived into the nuclear issue in 1979 with a crusader’s zeal and an “ad man’s flair”. He made his Christchurch home headquarters of the NZ Nuclear Free Zone Committee (NZNFZC) and sparked off a movement which had remarkable success: 66 percent of the population now live in such zones declared by local authorities.
One after another local authorities declared themselves nuclear-free in the face of a barrage of letter-writing and lobbying by peace campaigners. Even larger cities became nuclear-free – councillors in the country’s largest city of Auckland considered the issue three times before deciding “yes”. Indeed, it was better, according to Larry Ross, for a council to refuse the demand at first, because this meant campaigners had to go out and involve local people, talk to them on the doorstep and get them to sign petitions.
By the 1980s, the movement was becoming more organised. Peace Movement Aotearoa (PMA) was formed, while Māori campaigners, seeking with increasing success to link “anti-nuclearism” with racism and land rights, founded the Pacific People’s Anti-Nuclear Action Committee (PPANAC).
In the wake of the social upheaval caused by the protests against apartheid during the 1981 white South Africa rugby tour, enormous energy was released which became diverted to the peace movement. In one week alone, 40,000 people protested against a warship visit. The peace movement was finally a mass one – and the Lange government’s policy was a direct result.
Peace researcher Owen Wilkes at Motutara, Kawhia, in August 2003. Image: David Robie/PMC“Everybody thinks we have this brilliant Labour government which is dedicated to pacifism,” says Owen Wilkes. “But it isn’t, the government simply responded to public opinion, whereas in other countries where there have been similar big percentages against nuclear weapons, governments haven’t reacted.”
Why has there been such an extraordinary level of popular backing for the policy in New Zealand, a country which is so far from the centres of world tension and so unlikely to be a target in the case of any nuclear attack? One key factor has been the bitter resentment most people feel towards French nuclear testing in the South Pacific.
French persistence with the tests [they ended in 1996] in arrogant disregard of repeated protests by New Zealand, Australia and other neighbouring Pacific nations has helped keep New Zealanders acutely aware of the nuclear issue. It has also helped to provide the peace movement with credibility.
The Rainbow Warrior bombing and other photographs by John Miller at the 30 years of New Zealand’s nuclear-free law exhibition at the Depot Artspace in Devonport this week. Image: David Robie/PMCRainbow Warrior bombing
Last year [1985], the sight of the Greenpeace ship Rainbow Warrior, lying bombed and submerged in Auckland harbour while crew members mourned their dead photographer colleague, Fernando Pereira, became a brutal reminder to all New Zealanders of the realities of raising a voice against war. And it unquestionably strengthened the Lange government’s anti-nuclear resolve.
While Lange is portrayed internationally as a champion of the nuclear-free strategy, he is at times accused at home of backpedalling on the issue. The Peace Movement Aotearoa is also watchful for any sign that the government might soften its stance.
Last year [1985], the government tried to allow the nuclear-capable American warship Buchanan to visit and was only stymied by the strength of the peace movement. The protest ruined a carefully laid plan by the bureaucracy to open up a chink in the antinuclear strategy and prepare the ground for a compromise with the US.
Aotearoa’s policy has pushed it into an increasingly isolated position within the Western alliance. The US has applied severe pressure on the Lange government but overtly through diplomatic harassment and covertly through attempts to influence New Zealanders by CIA-funded projects involving journalists, trade unionists and opinion leaders. Britain, meanwhile, has sent envoys like Baroness Young to warn that if the NZ Nuclear-Free Zone, Disarmament and Arms Control Bill would be passed [it was enacted in June 1987] this would mean Aotearoa/NZ and the rest of the Wellington alliance would move apart.
In the face of this international pressure, Lange has become increasingly cautious. At Oxford University during the popular debate with the American Moral Majority’s Jerry Falwell in March 1985, Lange delighted his image as the nuclear-free David challenging the superpower Goliath.
But barely 15 months later, his delight in the image was not so obvious. On his first major tour of European capitals, in the wake of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in the Soviet Union, he was determined to reassure Western leaders that he was no pawn of the peace movement. During a speech to the Nobel Peace Prize-winning International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, Lange almost appeared to be defending the nuclear powers in his anxiety not to be seen to be “exporting” the anti-nuclear policy.
Many people in the peace movement were disappointed that he did not use the occasion to make an emotive plea to the West for follow Aotearoa’s example. They know that they have to keep up the pressure in order to counteract the influence of the Western alliance – and support from people internationally will help them. Otherwise, a stand that has become a great source of hope to the worldwide peace movement might be endangered.
David Robie is an independent journalist based in Auckland. He specialises in Pacific affairs and is author of Eyes of Fire: The Last Voyage of the Rainbow Warrior. This republished article was commissioned for the New Internationalist and published in the September 1986 edition.
]]>Celebrating 30 years of Nuclear-Free Aotearoa — the Pacific connection
Report by David Robie. This article was first published on Café Pacific
![]() |
| Auckland mayor Phil Goff admiring a photograph by John Miller taken of the politician when he was a student activist campaigning for a nuclear-free New Zealand. Goff spoke at the “Celebrating 30 Years of Nuclear-Free Aotearoa/New Zealand” at the Depot Artspace in Devonport today. Image” David Robie |
CONGRATULATIONS everybody for that tremendous achievement three decades ago. And thank you to WILPF and Ruth Coombes for inviting me. It was literally a David and Goliath struggle to make New Zealand nuclear-free – not just David Lange, prime minister at the time, although he was vital too.
The real “David” was the ordinary people of New Zealand who exerted extraordinary pressure on the government to deliver. The barrages of letters from citizens, constant lobbying by peace campaigners, local councils – such as right here in Devonport — declaring themselves nuclear-free, the door-knocking petitioners – and, of course, the spectacular protests.
However, in my few minutes I would like to talk about the Pacific context, as this was my background. While the New Zealand campaign and success was tremendously inspirational for the Pacific, it should not be forgotten that some small Pacific countries and communities were actually ahead of the game.
![]() |
| Rev George Armstrong … a founder of the Peace Squadron, at the heart of the nuclear-free protests. Image: David Robie |
- 1979 – The Republic of Palau (Belau) adopted a nuclear-free constitution and was forced by the United States to hold a further 10 referenda in attempts to undermine the document. The “father” of the constitution, President Haruo Remeliik was assassinated on 30 June 1985. In the end, the people of Belau were ironically forced to vote to drop their nuclear-free status for “economic survival” a month after New Zealand’s bill became law.
- 1980 – The newly independent nation of Vanuatu, formerly the New Hebrides, also adopted a nuclear-free constitution and banned nuclear ships from its territorial waters. The country was being led by the inspirational Father Walter Lini, who linked nuclear weapons with colonialism. (He was educated St John’s Theological College right here in Auckland.)
- 1983 – Tahiti’s airport suburb of Fa’aa led by mayor Oscar Temaru, who later became president of French-occupied Polynesia several times, declared itself nuclear free.
- 1987 – The first Fiji Labour Party government led by Dr Timoci Bavadra also planned to bring in a nuclear-free law, but was deposed at gunpoint in the first military coup of Lieutenant-Colonel Sitiveni Rabuka in May that year.
![]() |
| 1983: One of David Robie’s photos of the mystery “no nukes” girl in Vanuatu. |
Now, I would like to tell a story about a five-year-old girl who, for me personally, was symbolic of the nuclear-free struggle.
I met her in Independence Park in Port Vila at the Nuclear-Free and Independence Movement (NFIP) conference in 1983 — just three years after Vanuatu became independent and four years before our nuclear-free law was enacted.
I didn’t know her name or anything about her then. She just had a striking appearance and I took several photos of her at the time.
She was a delightful happy painted face in the crowd that day. Yet her message was haunting: “No nukes: Please don’t spoil my beautiful face,” said her poster.
Although I didn’t know it at the time, she was sitting with her mother.
![]() |
| 2014: The girl on the book cover … still a mystery. |
The photos in both monochrome and colour versions were published in various Pacific media and magazines over several years. All the time, questions kept tugging at me.
“Who is she? Where is she from and what is she doing now?”
Her placard slogan became the inspiration for my book in 2014, Don’t Spoil My Beautiful Face: Media, Mayhem and Human Rights in the Pacific, published by Little Island Press in New Zealand.
I would have loved to name her in the book along with the cover image of her. This spurred me onto to more determined efforts to discover her identity.
However, it seemed like a needle in a haystack mission with little prospect of success.
Social media search
First of all I posted the photo – and a Hawai’ian solidarity video that also showed the little girl, discovered by one of my student journalists – on my blog Café Pacific in October 2015. More than 1100 people viewed the blog item, but there were no tip-offs.
Then I posted it was on other blogs related to the Nuclear-Free and Independent Pacific (NFIP) movement. Again no luck.
Finally, friends at Vanuatu Daily Digest reposted my appeal on February 15 last year – and then she was identified on the southernmost island of Aneityum (“Atomic” Island, but the traditional name is “Keamu”) by people who knew her family.
Curiously, my wife Del (active in WILPF), and I were on that island at the same village, Anelgauhat, where she lives, on Christmas Day that year – and met her by chance. But we didn’t realise who she was.
![]() |
| 2016: June Keitadi (Warigini) … living in Anelgauhat village on Aneityum (“Atomic”) island in southern Vanuatu. |
That little girl is June Keitadi (Warigini) daughter of Annie Weitas and Jack Keitadi, then deputy curator of the Vanuatu Kaljoral Senta along with Kirk Huffman. All very active in the nuclear-free and independence movement.
Today June is assistant bursar at a local school and a Salvation Army volunteer on Aneityum. She is married, has three children and is very active in social justice issues.
My wife Del and I travelled back to this island in August last year and were welcomed to the village by June and the extended family. I have pictures on my blog about this.
A truly inspiring story.
The Pilger documentary
Just last year, John Pilger’s latest documentary, The Coming War on China, was premiered on RT Television and was shown recently in selected NZ cinemas with a short season. Pilger made several striking points in this film.
Among them was a reality check about the disputed Spratly Islands in the South China Sea – and China apparently establishing a base there – which recently became a flashpoint for global tension. News media exhaustively covered the situation.
What hasn’t been covered much, as revealed by Pilger, is the fact that China is encircled by US bases with a host of missiles pointing towards this country.John Pilger also gave a compelling account of the cultural, economic and health devastation inflicted by the post-war nuclear tests in the Republic of the Marshall Islands – then part of a United Nations trusteeship.
With test sites at sea, in the air, on reefs and underwater, says Pilger, the “total yield of the nuclear experiments on and around the Marshall Islands was equal to 7200 Hiroshima bombs, meaning the equivalent of more than one Hiroshima bomb was exploded in the area every day for 12 years.”
Bikini Island and other atolls in the Marshall Islands are still today unfit for human life.
Pilger also gave a compelling update on the fate of the people of Rongelap who were evacuated by the original Rainbow Warrior in May 1985 on the voyage leading up to the bombing here in Auckland just two months later.
![]() |
| Bev Cormack, deputy director of Greenpeace Aotearoa in the 1980s, speaking at the 30 years nuclear-free event in Devonport. Image: David Robie |
I was on board the “RDub” for this last voyage and my book Eyes of Fire and a TVNZ video based on my Rongelap exhibition photographs, Nuclear Exodus, tell the story. Sadly, the French spy drama at the time overshadowed the humanitarian voyage to the Marshall Islands.
It also overshadowed the shameful acts of the French politicians and military figures in the defence of colonialism – such as the assassination of schoolteacher leader of the Kanak independence movement, Eloï Machoro, in 1985 and the Ouvéa cave massacre of 19 young Kanak students and militants on 5 May 1988, less than a year after our nuclear-free law came into force.
The John Pilger documentary has brought home to us – just in case we need reminding – that the threat of nuclear war today is now the most ominous since the so-called Cold War.
I would just like to conclude my remarks by citing the preamble to the People’s Charter for a Nuclear-Free and Independent Pacific (NFIP), which says:
We, the people of the Pacific, have been victimised for too long by foreign powers. The Western imperialistic and colonial powers invaded our defenceless region, they took over our lands and subjugated our people to their whims.
This form of alien colonial, political and military domination unfortunately persists as an evil cancer in some of our native territories such as Tahiti-Polynesia, Kanaky, Australia and Aotearoa …
We … will assert ourselves and wrest control over the destiny of our nations and our environment from foreign powers, including transnational corporations.
This declaration is today just as meaningful as it was in the 1980s.We note in particular the recent racist roots of the world’s nuclear powers and we call for an end to the oppression, exploitation and subordination of the indigenous people of the Pacific.
These nuclear-free sentiments have now been revived through another struggle, the Pacific-wide movement for self-determination in West Papua.
The struggles continue …
]]>
Fake news ‘unlikely’ to gain presence in NZ media, says journalism panel
AsiaPacificReport.nz
By Kendall Hutt in Auckland
Seasoned journalists and academics have warned “fake news” could invade New Zealand’s media if journalists do not remain vigilant.
“It’s about using those principles, experience and judgment built up over time ” said TVNZ’s One News political editor Corin Dann.
“That will more or less likely filter out fake news.”
Dann’s “Fake news and the 2017 General Election” fellow panelists Chlöe Swarbrick, moderator Dr Gavin Ellis, Dr Maria Armoudian and Mark Jennings also told the audience at the University of Auckland this week current trends in journalism worldwide — business models, rise of social media — were driving fake news.
“Clickbait rather than substance are at the heart of fake news,” Greens List MP Chlöe Swarbrick reflected.
Mark Jennings, the journalist behind the launch of Newshub during his 27-year tenure with MediaWorks and now a co-editor of the independent Newsroom, said “media getting sucked into matching” was the door for fake news.
-Partners-
“If the first one gets it wrong, then both get it wrong.”
‘Nowhere near as bad as the US’
If a media organisation was to accidentally publish fake news, Jennings said the organisation should address it “fast in a fulsome way”.
However, if fake news were to invade New Zealand’s political sphere, it would be “nowhere near as bad as in the US,” Jennings said.
“Fake news nowhere near as bad as US” … reflects Newsroom co-editor Mark Jennings. Chlöe Swarbrick (left). Image: Kendall Hutt/PMCDr Armoudian, a lecturer in politics and international relations at the University of Auckland, explained this was because “here we still talk policy” while the US was witnessing a “polarised” and “personalised” invasion of politicians in the news.
“We’re seeing fake news as an extreme version of that.”
“We’re not going to suddenly get fake news,” Dann countered.
What New Zealanders might see, however, was “pressure” for information during elections.
It is important to remember, however, that fake news was not a new phenomenon, they stressed.
Fake news beyond ‘borders’
Dr Armoudian claimed the world had seen fake news during “manipulation” of the situation in a lead up to a coup in Chile in the 1970s because the US government “put newspapers on the payroll”.
“It’s very clear that fake news travels past Pacific oceans and borders.”
The University of Auckland’s Dr Maria Armoudian … fake news goes “beyond borders”. Image: Kendall Hutt/PMCOne audience member, Malcolm Evans, an award-winning independent cartoonist, agreed, saying that what the world was continuing to see was propaganda.
During a lecture at the University of Helsinki last year, Eddy Hawkins, an independent journalist with Finnish Broadcasting Company Yle reflected on the prevalence of disinformation, propaganda and fake news in the political sphere.
Hawkins noted disinformation had been hugely enabled by social media and the way media was currently consumed, namely “quickly and without question”.
“Be critical, analytical, beware of appeals to emotion masquerading as fact and logic,” he told the journalism and political students gathered.
The Auckland panelists, however, also identified a lower capacity for fact-checking in newsrooms due to the fact job-cuts had come about.
Fact-checking central
“We’ve lost some of the capacity for fact-checking,” Jennings admitted.
As a remedy to such occurrences, ABC in Australia has resumed a fact-checking service with the RMIT University journalism programme dubbed “RMIT ABC Fact Check.”
The Conversation also runs a fact-checking programming on its stories.
Swarbrick suggested part of the solution to fake news could be education.
“We need to see proper, informed citizens.
“Social media is the ‘Wild West’ at the moment, so it’s up to citizens to discern fake news.”
In closing Dr Ellis, a former New Zealand Herald editor-in-chief and now a senior lecturer in media and communication at the University of Auckland, reflected the “cure” may well be with citizens.
“We need to think with our head not our hearts. Think critically, not what we want to believe.”
Pacific leaders drive call for healthier oceans at UN conference
AsiaPacificReport.nz
Campaigning to save threatened Pacific and global fish stocks. Video: UN
Pacific Media Watch Newsdesk
Political leaders from across the Pacific have played a central role in talks this week surrounding healthier oceans during the UN Ocean Conference in New York, with Fiji Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama calling for a “global crusade”.
Co-hosted by Fiji and Sweden, the “game changing” conference aims to see Sustainable Development Goal 14 – the conservation and sustainable use of the world’s oceans and its resources – become a reality.
Fijian Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama … “place SDG 14 at the very top of the global agenda”. Image: The Ocean ConferenceDuring his opening address, Prime Minister Bainimarama appealed for the world’s population of 7.5 billion people to join Fiji in ensuring the health of oceans is improved, The Fiji Times‘ Tevita Vuibau reported.
“Let us all seize this moment in history to make a difference. To place SDG 14 at the very top of the global agenda alongside decisive climate change. We can do it. We must do it. The alternative in both cases is catastrophe.”
Bainimarama, a president of the conference alongside Swedish Deputy Prime Minister Isabella Lövin, highlighted this was urgent due to the rapid deterioration of ocean fish stocks and the polluted state of the world’s oceans.
-Partners-
“So much of what we dispose of carelessly finally ends up in our seas through storm water drains, creeks and rivers,” he said.
“Our waterways are choking. Our seas and oceans have become vast rubbish dumps. And the creatures who live in them are suffering acutely – turtles, dolphins and sharks caught in netting, whales with stomachs full of plastic bags and other rubbish.
‘Precious’ resource dying
“Humankind is slowly killing off one of our most precious resources – the rich bounty of our seas and oceans that generations across the millennia have relied upon for sustenance, and to earn a living.”
Palau’s president Tommy Remengesau also called for 30 percent of the world’s oceans to be protected by 2030, Radio New Zealand International reported.
Palau had already set aside 80 percent of its seas as a no-take marine sanctuary, so other countries should work together to establish a system of protected areas, he said.
“Within this worldwide network of protected areas, we must take into account the need for sustainable development and create opportunities for food security initiatives in developing countries enhancing small-scale and artisanal fisheries and building capacity in sustainable fisheries, tourism, and aquaculture.”
But while the world met for action on SDG 14, the Marshall Islands Student Association (MISA) continued its calls for nuclear testing in the Pacific to be remedied through recognition of SDG 14.1.
In a joint statement with Youngsolwara issued on the eve of World Oceans Day (June 8) and endorsed by several environmental NGOs and civil society groups, MISA urged world leaders to remember the people of the Pacific have been treated like “guinea pigs”.
“The consequences of detonating hundreds of nuclear bombs of a much greater destructive power than Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombs are still being felt today by indigenous islanders – manifesting in, among other impacts, debilitating health and inter-generational maladies.
‘Pacific people’s health threatened‘
This legacy continues to threaten not just Pacific islanders and the Pacific Ocean, but the health and well-being of all the planet’s oceans and the people who depend upon them.”
MISA and Youngsolwara also reflected on the danger the ocean now poses to the existence of many Pacific Island countries due to climate change and increased their call for the world to not forget they are on the front-lines of a warming planet.
“We call upon the leaders and peoples of the Pacific to further our efforts in making our voices heard. The United States has pulled out of the Paris accord, but we the people of Wansolwara (one salt water) remain committed.”
MISA’s sentiments were echoed by Bainimarama, PACNEWS editor Makereta Komai reported, as he called for Pacific leaders and citizens to lead by example at a side event organised by the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP).
“While we in the Pacific await this global response, we must do what we can ourselves. We must make a much greater effort to work together among ourselves to confront the challenge we collectively face.”
He admitted Fiji was also to blame for “rubbishing” the environment and therefore had a responsibility to preserve the oceans and leave “carelessness” and “thoughtlessness” behind.
“We can blame the bigger countries around the Pacific Rim as much as we like – and God knows they need to clean up their act.
NZ’s ‘special rsponsibility’
“But we also need to clean up ours. In far too many parts of Fiji, the Fijian people are rubbishing their country in a way that they would never rubbish their own homes.”
In New Zealand, Greens List MP Marama Davidson questioned Paula Bennet, Minister for Climate Change Issues, on the government’s commitment in leading the Pacific on climate change.
While Davidson claimed New Zealand had a “special responsibility” because the “very existence” of the Pacific is threatened by climate change, Bennet stated New Zealand’s leadership depended on “context”.
“I certainly agree that New Zealand needs to play our part in the global effort to reduce climate change. I think leadership depends on context within that.
I think we have a very special relationship with the Pacific islands. It’s why we provide so much aid there. It’s why we’ve committed more than $200 million towards contributing to helping our Pacific cousins.”
Through a series of supplementary questions, Davidson continued to question Bennet on the government’s apparent lack of “real” leadership on climate change, particularly surrounding what she called a “refusal” to support Pacific leaders in condemning US President Donald Trump’s exit from the Paris Agreement.
Bennet stood by her earlier answers, however, and reiterated the government’s “disappointment” in Trump’s decision while commending the actions of New Zealand’s Pacific neighbours.
Pacific actions commended
“I think I’ve made it pretty clear that we’re more interested in the actions that we take and I’m proud of them.
Those island states are welcome to make whatever comments they like, it’s called democracy. And if those are the comments they want to make on what President Trump has said, well good on them.”
More than 600 voluntary committments to improve the health of the oceans have been made by countries, businesses and civil society groups since the Ocean Conference began on Monday and ends today.
]]>‘We’re going to survive war on drugs,’ university dealers tell Duterte
AsiaPacificReport.nz
By Roy Abrahmn Narra in Manila
Drug dealers and users at a private university in the Philippines capital of Manila are confident they will survive President Rodrigo Duterte’s “war on drugs”.
The students say this is because Duterte is going after those who peddle methamphetamine (shabu) and party drugs such as ecstasy.
They claim their drugs – marijuana and cocaine – are currently flying under the administration’s radar.
One of the students, “Bossing”, from a private university in Metro Manila, therefore continues his trade of not only marijuana, but also acid and cocaine.
“Duterte’s focus is on shabu and party drugs. I’m only using marijuana and cocaine.”
Bossing, who has frequently used marijuana since his time in junior high school, says he is not “scared” of Duterte.
-Partners-
“I am not using shabu.”
‘Not really a target’
Another student at a private university, ‘Jeremy’, holds a similar view and feels Duterte condemns the use of shabu more than marijuana.
“I feel the president is lenient to marijuana. What he is looking for is shabu. With marijuana, it will be unfortunate if you get caught using it, but you the marijuana user, is not really a target.
“I am quite scared but I feel I am safe.”
Jeremy’s friend “Ranz”, also a marijuana user since third year junior high school, is more scared of the barking K-9 units in train stations than the controversial operations of the Philippine National Police against drug users and dealers.
“I am not dealing with shabu,” he says.
Ranz, who admitted voting for Duterte in the May 2016 national elections, says marijuana users like himself are “small time” and therefore do not care about accusations of extrajudicial killings.
“What the f— do we care about those things?”
Police corruption allegations
Bossing, Jeremy and Ranz admit they “feel protected’ by what they claim is a culture of corruption among police.
Ranz says this is because the police force is “poor”, so bribe money from suspected drug users.
Drug dealers, meanwhile, are an “escape route”.
“Even if one pretends to be a rich person, the police would not care about you and it is already your advantage.”
Ranz says he wants the ‘war on drugs’ to continue.
“Shabu is the only problematic drug that should be eliminated. Keep it up,” he encouraged.
On May 31, 2017, the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) held a public consultation to determine the feasibility of requiring college students to undergo a drug test prior to enrolment.
‘Actively confront’ drugs
The idea had been floated the previous year by the Coordinating Council of Private Educational Associations (COCOPEA), who urged CHED on September 2, 2016, to “actively confront” drug testing “with due consideration to academic freedom of higher education institutions, the principle of reasonable regulation of educational institutions, and accessibility of quality education for all”.
However, Bossing, Jeremy and Ranz are adamant mandatory drug testing will not stand in the way of their habit or stop other college students from taking drugs.
“There many ways to avoid getting caught, like borrowing someone else’s urine samples.”
In the past, when Jeremy and Ranz were selected for a random drug test – authorised by the Republic Act 9165 or the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002 – they said they did not take marijuana for a month prior to the test.
Their results were “negative.”
With the result, Ranz says he can use it to protect himself “from any harm” he may endure.
But as long as Bossing, Jeremy, and Ranz stay away from shabu, they “are going to survive the war on drugs”.
Roy Abrahmn Narra is an MA in Journalism student at the University of Santo Tomas, and produced this story for his graduate class Global Journalism Practice and Studies.
Also by Roy Abrahmn Narra:
More women in Solomon Islands politics — how it needs to be done
AsiaPacificReport.nz
In this University of the South Pacific’s student journalist documentary broadcast on Radio Pasifik, Wansolwara’s Elizabeth Osifelo investigates the issue of women participating in Solomon Islands politics.
With just one female MP in a house of 50 MPs in Honiara, there is a broad agreement that something most be done to increase female representation.
Osifelo looks at the politics of the proposed 10 reserved parliamentary seats for women and discusses the issues facing the next generation of leaders.
Greenpeace Indonesia protesters target US climate policy ‘disaster’
AsiaPacificReport.nz
Pacific Media Centre News Desk
Greenpeace Indonesia has staged a protest in front of the US embassy in Jakarta over the decision of President Donald Trump withdrawing from the Paris Agreement on climate change.
“President Trump looks likely to turn away from the impact of climate change with millions of people falling victim of natural disasters such as flooding, drought and extreme weather which have hit many countries including Indonesia,” climate and energy spokesman of Greenpeace Indonesia Didit Haryo said.
The protest was carried out on Wednesday.
Didit said the United States was the second largest contributor to gas emissions after China, adding industries in United States were even the largest emitters from the 1850s or the era of Industrial Revolution until 2010.
The United States would play a serious role hampering the global efforts to check rising global heat, he said, adding the policy of Trump reflected not what happened in US cities.
“The steps taken by Trump would not halt serious commitments by world leaders. Now it is important to implement the commitments especially in energy sector,” he said.
-Partners-
Indonesia also has pledged to maintain its commitment.
However, expansion had continued in coal mining and use that would make it difficult for the Indonesia government to fully implement its commitment to Paris agreement, he said.
China has proved its transitional commitment by building solar power plants with a capacity of 43,000 megawatt (MW) until 2016 and cancelled plan to build 104 coal fired power plants with a total capacity of 120,000 MW.
“There should be no debate over the capability of renewable energy to meet our requirement. What is important is political will of the government,” he added.
Wansolwara student journos report on West Papua human rights struggle
AsiaPacificReport.nz
By Vilimaina Naqelevuki in Suva
Media access to West Papua, where more than half a million of its indigenous people have reportedly been killed over five decades, remains restricted.
Full support … West Papuan Independence leader Benny Wenda (in red shirt) holds the banned West Papuan Morning Star flag with key supporter Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare during his visit last year. Image: bennywenda.orgNews coverage of the alleged genocide is extremely difficult because of the restrictions on local and foreign media.
Some West Papuan journalists have also died in their effort to tell the truth about the deaths that largely occur in remote rural areas.
This makes news coverage of the alleged atrocities in the Indonesia-occupied land extremely difficult.
West Papuan independence leader Benny Wenda, in an online interview, told Wansolwara the restrictions allowed for the atrocities to remain “silenced”.
And even if access was granted after the labyrinthine effort, “journalists cannot go freely to report on politics in West Papua,” he said.
-Partners-
“They will get followed and questioned by Indonesian intelligence and West Papuans will suffer intimidation and threats if they speak to journalists.”
Recent prominence
Papua New Guinea Media Council president Alexander Rheeney said West Papua’s struggle of more than 50 years had only been given prominence in the region’s mainstream media in recent years.
Less than 10 years ago, the mainstream news media – in neighbouring countries like Fiji, Australia and New Zealand, ignored the situation in West Papua. It was effectively a media “black hole”.
Rheeney said it was more challenging for Pacific journalists whose governments recognised the sovereignty Indonesia had over West Papua.
“The media in PNG have reported on West Papua and all the human rights abuses but not as much as we would want it to despite the fact that PNG and West Papua share a land order,” he said.
Professor David Robie speaking at the Free Media in West Papua seminar in Jakarta, Indonesia, last month. Image: Alves FonatabaThe increasing coverage by Pacific news media should be commended, said journalism educator Professor David Robie.
Dr Robie, director of the Auckland-based Pacific Media Centre, who has regularly written and published news on West Papua’s struggle for more than three decades, said it was a huge relief that the Pacific was “finally waking up to the issue of West Papua”.
“This an issue of Melanesian solidarity, Pacific solidarity – an issue of self-determination, and the Pacific countries that got independence on a plate ought to be telling this story,” he said.
Jakarta media freedom conference
Dr Robie was one of the keynote speakers invited last month to the Free Media in West Papua forum at the UNESCO World Press Freedom Day 2017 conference in the Indonesian capital of Jakarta.
He spoke along with Indonesian and Papuan human rights activists and Tabloid Jubi editor Victor Mambor of Jayapura.
Pacific Freedom Forum editor Jason Brown said it was an utter disgrace that some in mainstream media published or broadcast stories on wars from other regions and “not in our own backyard”.
“In recent years, RNZI has done a much better job of covering West Papua. The recent closure of shortwave services by Radio Australia, however, means that the region has lost reliable access to news on West Papua from that source,” said Brown.
Rheeney warned that the region could not afford to fail fellow Pacific Islanders of West Papua.
He said to do so would be to doom the Pacific region to more instability.
“If a prosperous Pacific region is to be ensured, the issue of West Papua must be addressed,” he said.
Timor-Leste lessons
“As journalists we can no longer continue to turn a blind eye on all the human rights abuses that is happening.
“The PNG government can no longer turn a blind eye on what is happening on the other side of the border.”
Dr Robie said that informed political decisions could not be reached if the news media were not allowed to report freely on West Papua.
He said this lesson could easily be drawn from East-Timor’s road to independence.
East Timor, which was also occupied by Indonesia in 1975, secured its independence after a handful of journalists exposed the human rights violations through video smuggled out of the Indonesian-ruled territory, especially after the Santa Cruz massacre in the capital Dili in 1991.
Indonesia’s control rapidly fell apart after international pressure.
“In-depth and timely media coverage will save lives as West Papua lurches towards independence — which will come eventually — no matter how hard Jakarta tries to block this,” said Dr Robie.
Rheeney is also optimistic. He said Pacific journalists should continue to report on the issue, to keep the struggle in the news so that lasting solutions were found sooner and more bloodshed is prevented.
Vilimaina Naqelevuki is a final year journalism student with the USP Journalism Programme. Naqelevuki is pursuing a double major in journalism and politics, and is pictures editor of Wansolwara, the student news publication produced by the Journalism Programme.
One year after vowing support for Games, Pohiva calls for another host
AsiaPacificReport.nz
By Philip Cass in Auckland
It is just under a year since the Tongan government assured the Pacific Games Council that it was fully committed to hosting the 2019 Games.
But the Tongan government said this week it would stand by its decision to not host the regional sporting event.
Prime Minister ‘Akilisi Pohiva made the announcement during a meeting with Pacific Games Council president Vidhya Lakhan.
Lakhan asked for a meeting with the government to see whether it would change its mind about withdrawing from the Games.
Pohiva asked the PGC to endorse the government’s decision and to consider having another country host the 2019 Games.
Samoa has already lodged a submission to host the Games in place of Tonga.
-Partners-
In reiterating the government’s decision, the Prime Minister once again cited economic reasons as the basis for withdrawing.
He based his original shock decision on a 2013 report on the consequences of holding the Games.
During the meeting with Lakhan, Pohiva said there were more important matters in Tonga which needed the government’s attention.
In late June 2016, Lakhan and PGC executive director Andrew Minogue flew to Nuku’alofa to assess the state of preparations for Tonga’s hosting of the 2019 Pacific Games.
During the visit the Tongan government expressed its full support for hosting the 2019 Pacific Games.
Lakhan also received extensive briefings from the staff of the Tongan Pacific Games Organising Committee on the development of the sports and marketing programmes.
“The Pacific Games Council is pleased the Prime Minister is now involved in overseeing the Tongan government’s commitment to hosting the 2019 Pacific Games and providing the necessary facilities and funding support to stage a successful Games,” Lakhan said after the PGC visit in 2016.
Dr Philip Cass is a journalist and media academic contributing to Kaniva News. This article is republished with permission.
Contemporary Pacific dance festival showcase ‘first of its kind’
AsiaPacificReport.nz
By Brandon Ulfsby in Auckland
Contemporary dance is set to take centre stage at next week’s Pacific Dance Festival.
The two week-long festival organised by Pacific Dance New Zealand is being held at the Māngere Arts Centre and will run from June 15-24.
Pacific Dance New Zealand (PDNZ) spokesperson Cilla Brown says the event celebrates and provides a platform for contemporary Pacific artists to showcase their work.
“There’s a bit of a wave with this new contemporary Pacific dance coming out. This is a way to showcase it and also develop and perform.”
She says the festival, which debuted last year, is the first of its kind and has gained more interest this year.
“It’s definitely grown, there’s heaps more interest and a lot more artists. Even international artists have inquired. This year we got 3 groups from Wellington.”
-Partners-
The two-week programme will feature work from several artists, including a piece called Wahine Toa – a collection of performances by four female choreographers.
Showcasing Pacific dance
Interdisciplinary artist Pati Solomona Tyrell will present his work called Fa’aafa which touches on the relationship between queer Pacific children and their parents.
“There’s a piece in my work where I’m having a conversation in Sāmoan that me and my parents had when I came out to them. This platform will allow me to reach an audience that I otherwise wouldn’t have been able to reach.”
Local artist and curator Ema Tavola says she feels enriched and empowered by seeing Pacific works and is looking forward to the festival.
“It’s uplifting to see Pacific people using creative expression to tackle and understand pertinent issues. The rootedness in Pacific dance and movement means this festival is anchored to our homelands – It makes me feel close to home.”
Brown says having the festival in Mangere also brings the theatre to the Pacific community.
“There’s a lot of Pacific communities there already. It’s important for our community especially our Pacific kids to see our community on the stage as professional choreographers and dancers.”
Tavola says she is glad to see the festival held in South Auckland.
Pacific culture accessible
“It’s accessible to Pacific audiences and young people, and adds real value to our local arts landscape out here; and as a Pacific person seeing this kind of thing – I love it.”
The event will also include an art exhibition showcasing cultural dance costumes as well as workshops for local schools with artists and performers.
Contemporary dance performance Nu’u by group, Freshmans Crew, will debut at the festival on June 17 before they travel to Hawaii, Los Angeles and Utah.
Brandon Ulfsby is a student journalist with Auckland University of Technology’s training newspaper Te Waha Nui.
Pacific Ocean: ‘We cannot let history repeat itself – we’re not guinea pigs’
AsiaPacificReport.nz
OPINION: A Pacific World Oceans Day message from Youngsolwara Pacific and MISA4thePacific
As regional leaders gather in New York for the week-long United Nations oceans conference, we wish to recognise the Pacific’s storied history, as stewards of the world’s largest ocean. We acknowledge the test of time that this region has withstood, and commemorate those who have endure and withstood nuclear testing, a period in history with ramifications that are still felt by our oceans, lands, and peoples.
We remember this period as being a time when our oceans and people were utilised as guinea pigs by foreign powers. We acknowledge the issues both past and present that the Pacific faces, and we firmly refute the narrative that “we are victims’”.
We stand tall as the next generation of Pacific Islanders who shall also thrive on our sea of islands. We stand on the shoulders of the giants who went before us to make a stand.
On this note we call upon our Pacific and global leaders to take a stand against genocide. We, the Pacific, will not allow a repetition of colonialism.
Our peoples have suffered greatly from the destructive programmes of militarised colonial powers during the 20th century, continuing into the 21st. The legacy of nuclear testing throughout Oceania, in particular the Marshall Islands, French Polynesia, and elsewhere, has never been effectively remedied or addressed.
The consequences of detonating hundreds of nuclear bombs of a much greater destructive power than Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombs are still being felt today by indigenous islanders – manifesting in, among other impacts, debilitating health and intergenerational maladies.
-Partners-
Runit Dome leaking
This legacy continues to threaten not just Pacific islanders and the Pacific Ocean, but the health and wellbeing of all the planet’s oceans and the people who depend upon them. Radioactive materials currently contained in Runit Dome on Enewetak Atoll in the Marshall Islands are leaking into the surrounding ocean and groundwater.
The Runit Dome was a haphazard attempt by the US military to contain 111,000 cubic yards of radioactive waste in an unlined crater. It was never replaced by a safe, permanent structure and instead is currently cracking and polluting the local surroundings.
Henry Kissinger in response to nuclear testing in the Marshall Islands, is quoted as stating: “There are only 90,000 people out there. Who gives a damn?” In response, we say: We are still here, and we are not going anywhere.
Cactus dome on Runit Island is testament to a history of experimentation, and the violation of our fundamental human rights. Leakage from the dome has resulted in the runoff of radioactive materials which poses serious concerns to the health of our oceans and the people who rely on them.
Parallels can be made with the ongoing contamination of our oceans as a result of terrestrial mining. Contaminants and runoff from existing mines remain a threat to the viability of our marine ecosystems. The oceans have still not recovered from the destructive acts of world wars, nuclear testing, and continued military maneuvers.
Intensified efforts must be made to demilitarise the oceans and to clean-up existing messes. As we the Pacific clamour for international action to halt carbon emissions, and desist from environmentally degrading activities, let us therefore be the change that we wish to see in the world.
Today, there are also parallels to be seen with the advent of extractive industries such as experimental seabed mining. Seabed mining is an issue that governments in the Pacific are still toying with.
No indigenous voices
Yet, this has not been tested anywhere else in the world. The discussion on seabed mining has proceeded narrowly for the past 30 years. There has not been inclusion of indigenous voices or much thought as to the inordinate risks in operating an untested extractive industry, in a fragile and almost completely unknown deep sea environment.
A recent joint study by 14 international universities and organisations discovered that hydrothermal vents and methane seeps on the ocean floor play a crucial role in regulating global climate – and that releasing or destroying them “would be a doomsday climatic event.”
In addition to likely and potentially irreversible environmental impacts, seabed mining is a long-term, experimental venture in which any potential profits for States must be offset by the short-term impacts, which could include destruction of local fisheries and resultant impacts on human health and livelihoods. There also remains the issue that on our ocean beds, plutonium from past nuclear tests has settled. Seabed mining can potentially act as a catalyst for the further dispersion of these contaminants.
It is, in short, a gamble, especially when compared to already profitable industries with a proven track record of sustainability such as ecotourism. Rather than shoulder inordinate risk in the hopes of a hypothetical, distant, and comparatively small cut of revenue, our Pacific governments should allow time for significantly more scientific study, and consider alternative partnerships with industries which, by their very nature, are inherently more sustainable.
We are once again faced with the same situation where foreign influences seek to utilise the Pacific for their own means. Our ocean cannot yet again be used as an experimental test bed for an activity whose full environmental ramifications are still not fully known.
We stand in solidarity with our brothers and sisters in New Ireland and the Duke of York Islands in Papua New Guinea, and call for a ban on experimental seabed mining in our waters. We call upon the peoples of the Pacific. We cannot allow such a repetition of experimentation that will again affect our oceans and our people.
Weathered test of time
We the Pacific have weathered the test of time. Over the millennia, our people have not simply survived, but thrived through the bounty of our oceans. With the advent of human induced climate change, the ocean that has nurtured us for millennia, has now become a threat to the existence of our islands. We call upon the leaders and peoples of the Pacific to further our efforts in making our voices heard. The United States has pulled out of the Paris accord, but we the people of “Wansolwara” (one salt water) remain committed.
Let us embrace the spirit of the Marshallese saying “Lappout Iene” which means to utilise or employ all the knowledge, skills and resources available to solve a problem. With this, we say that we the people of Wansolwara are in this together. When nuclear testing was occurring, the people of Wansolwara did not remain passive.
We call on our leaders to honour that proud legacy, and to Lappout Iene, make a stand and recognise and address the fact that our land, ocean and people have historically been used as guinea pigs to fuel the greed, defence needs, and convenience of foreign entities.
The advent of deep seabed mining is simply another evolution in this history of greed-fuelled economic exploitation, and a callous disregard for the environmental and human life. We the people of Wansolwara stand firmly opposed to militarism, environmental degradation, and the violation of our human rights. We are Oceania, we are Wansolwara, and we are the sea of islands.
We will not allow this history to repeat itself!
]]>












































