Source: The Conversation – Africa (2)
All United Nations member states adopted the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2015. They cover poverty, health, education, inequality, climate change, peace and other global issues. The goals are now approaching their 2030 deadline.
The goals matter because they shape national plans, international cooperation and decisions about development funding. The question of what should follow them can no longer be postponed.
The UN has already begun preparing for that discussion. The Pact for the Future invites the High-level Political Forum, under the auspices of the General Assembly, to consider in September 2027 how sustainable development should be advanced by 2030 and beyond.
This gives the African Union and its member states about a year to agree on their priorities and influence the debate before its main ideas are settled.
Will Africa help write it, or simply respond to it?
We study Africa’s leadership in global development debates. A recent study led by Hafte Gebreselassie Gebrihet examines how the Common African Position, a shared set of African priorities for the negotiations that produced the SDGs, influenced the post-2015 development agenda. It shows that Africa has helped shape a global development framework before. In 2014, African governments adopted the common position while negotiations on the goals were still under way. It gave African negotiators a shared set of priorities before the final agreement was reached.
Entering the process with an agreed position gave them more influence. It identified structural transformation, decent work, science and technology, peace and security, environmental sustainability, development finance and more equitable global partnerships as priorities for the continent. Several of these ideas were later reflected in the SDGs.
This mattered because African governments had long been treated more as implementers of global development agendas than as agenda setters. Structural adjustment programmes in the 1980s and 1990s introduced major economic reforms across the continent with limited regard for African priorities. The Millennium Development Goals later focused global attention on poverty, health and education, but offered little space for a coordinated African role in defining the agenda itself.
The Common African Position changed that pattern. It showed that influence begins before leaders arrive at a summit, when priorities are defined, coalitions are built and negotiating language is drafted.
That lesson matters again.
Can the African Union do it again?
The Common African Position was not the product of easy agreement among African governments. It followed two years of political organisation and consultation.
The AU Assembly gave the African Union Commission responsibility for identifying continental priorities with member states and regional economic communities. The assembly also created a committee of ten heads of state and government. Liberia’s President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf led it. The committee coordinated African leaders and built support beyond the continent.
Parliamentarians, regional organisations, civil society groups, women and young people, trade unions, academics and businesses contributed to consultations at national, regional and continental levels.
African and UN institutions provided technical support. After the common position was adopted, the AU Assembly told member states to speak with one voice. It also asked the committee to develop a plan for advocacy, negotiation and alliance building.
A similar effort is possible today. Africa still has time to shape the process.
The Addis Ababa Declaration, adopted in April 2026 at the Africa Regional Forum on Sustainable Development, calls for active and collective African engagement in shaping the post-2030 framework.
The declaration links the process to African priorities and the AU’s Agenda 2063. It sets out initial ideas for the next framework. It also asks Mauritius to present the declaration and its main messages at the 2027 summit and other international meetings.
But the declaration is a starting point, not a new common position.
Turning it into a formal continental negotiating position will require leadership from heads of state. The African Union Commission must coordinate the process. Governments must also consult widely and agree on priorities.
The next framework will be negotiated under very different conditions. Climate change has intensified. Debt has increased. Aid budgets are shrinking. Competition among global powers is changing international cooperation. New technologies are also creating opportunities and widening inequalities.
Africa’s experience with the Common African Position points to five ways the continent can strengthen its influence when negotiations begin.
Five crucial steps
1. Agree on priorities early
African leaders adopted the common position before the global goals were finalised. They entered the process with a common understanding of their priorities and interests.
The post-2030 framework may sound distant. But the ideas that will shape it are already being discussed. By the time governments enter formal negotiations, many of the main proposals will have been developed, debated and revised.
African governments should begin that work now, before the main choices are made.
2. Speak with one voice
The African Union has 55 member states. They have different political systems, economies and development priorities. Complete agreement is neither realistic nor necessary. But the 2014 experience showed that African countries can gain influence by agreeing on their main priorities.
A coordinated position gives negotiators greater leverage than dozens of separate national interventions. It also shows that certain concerns are continental rather than national.
This will matter in debates over climate finance, debt restructuring, access to technology and reform of international institutions.
3. Align the post-2030 agenda with Agenda 2063
Africa does not need to invent a new vision for itself every time the international community develops a new framework. It already has one.
Agenda 2063 sets out the African Union’s long-term aspirations for an integrated, prosperous and peaceful continent driven by its own citizens.
Building on Agenda 2063 would give the African position both continuity and political credibility.
The task is to ensure that the next global framework reflects priorities Africa has already chosen.
4. Focus on a limited number of strategic priorities
A long list of demands would weaken Africa’s negotiating position. A future common position should not include every challenge facing the continent. It should focus on issues where African countries have urgent needs and shared interests.
The priorities should include development finance, climate adaptation, debt sustainability, technological capacity and reform of global institutions.
A shorter list would help African negotiators defend each priority more consistently. It would also make it easier to build alliances and keep attention on the issues that matter most.
5. Move from reacting to agenda-setting
Africa’s influence increased when it helped define the debate rather than reacting to proposals developed elsewhere.
For decades, African countries have often been portrayed as recipients of development agendas designed by others. The Common African Position challenged that assumption. It showed that African governments can shape international priorities when they enter the process early, coordinate their positions and connect their concerns to wider global debates.
Before the 2027 SDG Summit, the African Union and its member states should agree on a concise post-2030 position rooted in Agenda 2063. Otherwise, Africa risks returning to a familiar role: accepting choices that were made elsewhere.
Hafte Gebreselassie Gebrihet is a researcher affiliated with the Centre for Global Sustainability at the University of Oslo.
Dan Banik receives funding from the Research Council of Norway and the University of Oslo.
Original source: https://analysis1.mil-osi.com/2026/08/02/africa-shaped-the-global-2030-development-agenda-how-it-can-influence-what-comes-next/