<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paraka Lawyers &#8211; Evening Report</title>
	<atom:link href="https://eveningreport.nz/category/paraka-lawyers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://eveningreport.nz</link>
	<description>Independent Analysis and Reportage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 23:17:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Transparency PNG calls for further charges over ‘worrying’ Paraka case</title>
		<link>https://eveningreport.nz/2023/06/03/transparency-png-calls-for-further-charges-over-worrying-paraka-case/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Asia Pacific Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 23:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIL-OSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Papua New Guinea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paraka Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Paraka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Aitsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNZ Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency International PNG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eveningreport.nz/2023/06/03/transparency-png-calls-for-further-charges-over-worrying-paraka-case/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[RNZ Pacific Transparency International Papua New Guinea has welcomed the conviction of lawyer Paul Paraka as the police confirm they are widening the investigation into the fraud case. The NGO admits the depths of Paraka’s activities, revealed by the case, are very worrying. Paraka, who had operated his own eponymous law firm, was convicted of ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/" rel="nofollow"><em>RNZ Pacific</em></a></p>
<p>Transparency International Papua New Guinea has welcomed the conviction of lawyer Paul Paraka as the police confirm they are widening the investigation into the fraud case.</p>
<p>The NGO admits the <a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2023/05/29/png-lawyer-paraka-found-guilty-of-misappropriating-k162m/" rel="nofollow">depths of Paraka’s activities</a>, revealed by the case, are very worrying.</p>
<p>Paraka, who had operated his own eponymous law firm, was <a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2023/05/29/png-lawyer-paraka-found-guilty-of-misappropriating-k162m/" rel="nofollow">convicted of misappropriating 162 million kina (about NZ$75 million)</a> in government funds, between 2007 and 2011.</p>
<p>Transparency PNG spokesperson, Peter Aitsi, said the evidence outlined the complex structures that Paraka and others put together.</p>
<p><strong>Significant case</strong><br />He said it was a very significant case because of the amount of public money involved.</p>
<p>“And those are just the funds that have been identified within this case itself and paid to different parties as a result of Paraka’s activities.</p>
<p>“From a TI point of view we would encourage the agencies to continue to develop the evidence and if there are further charges to be laid against individuals then we would encourage them to ensure they uphold their duty and responsibility,” Aitsi said.</p>
<p>Paraka’s law firm, which he claimed was the biggest in the country, was engaged by the Attorney-General and Solicitor-General’s office in 2000, but this arrangement ceased in 2006.</p>
<p>However, from 2007 the state was still making payments to legal firms linked to Paraka.</p>
<p>Investigations have seesawed for 10 years and led to the replacement of the Attorney-General, the shutting down of the police fraud unit investigating the matter, and acccusations of politicians being involved.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Paul Paraka threatened legal action amid claims the issues were simply administrative matters.</p>
<p><strong>Police action<br /></strong> Police Commissioner David Manning has confirmed an investigation into fraud, money laundering and misappropriation following Paraka’s conviction.</p>
<p>Manning said the Paraka case attracted significant national interest due to the huge amounts of public money involved in these corrupt dealings.</p>
<p>“The way and manner in which these funds were syphoned through the Department of Finance to various law firms, who would then transfer this money to Mr Paraka himself, has been the subject of public outrage,” he said.</p>
<p>Manning said police will continue to pursue, investigate, charge and arrest those involved, and to recoup all money lost in these illegal deals.</p>
<p><em><em><span class="caption">This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.</span></em></em></p>
<div class="printfriendly pf-button pf-button-content pf-alignleft"><a href="#" rel="nofollow" onclick="window.print(); return false;" title="Printer Friendly, PDF &amp; Email"><img decoding="async" class="pf-button-img" src="https://cdn.printfriendly.com/buttons/printfriendly-pdf-button.png" alt="Print Friendly, PDF &amp; Email"/></a></div>
<p>Article by <a href="https://www.asiapacificreport.nz/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">AsiaPacificReport.nz</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawyer Paul Paraka hits back at PNG state with ‘citizens’ rights’ lawsuit</title>
		<link>https://eveningreport.nz/2018/03/26/lawyer-paul-paraka-hits-back-at-png-state-with-citizens-rights-lawsuit/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Centre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 08:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIL-OSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Region]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Papua New Guinea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paraka Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paraka saga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Paraka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PMC Reportage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PNG Post-Courier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eveningreport.nz/2018/03/26/lawyer-paul-paraka-hits-back-at-png-state-with-citizens-rights-lawsuit/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[
				
				<![CDATA[]]>				]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>				<![CDATA[

<p><em>Lawyer Paul Paraka announces he will go to court to clear himself and claim for damages. Video: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWoEfJE7oFM" rel="nofollow">EMTV News</a></em></p>




<p><em><a href="http://www.pmc.aut.ac.nz" rel="nofollow">Pacific Media Centre</a> Newsdesk</em></p>




<p>Embattled Papua New Guinean lawyer Paul Paraka has challenged the government with a lawsuit citing a section of the constitution never previously used for “breaching his citizen rights”, reports the <em>PNG Post-Courier</em>.</p>




<p>He has applied to the courts using a constitutional section that could imprison ministers, members of the anti-corruption Task Force Sweep, head of state agencies and banks for up to 10 years imprisonment for a breach of his rights as a citizen.</p>




<p>Paraka, who has made headlines since 2013 is testing Section 23 for a breach of Constitution that has never been exercised in the country since independence in 1975.</p>




<p><a href="https://www.radionz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/353413/controversial-png-lawyer-seeks-hefty-damages-payment" rel="nofollow"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Controversial PNG lawyer seeks hefty damages payment</a></p>




<p>He is also seeking hundreds of millions of kina damages in the affair – known locally as as the Paraka saga – against the state, its agents and those individuals involved, reports Jeffrey Elapa.</p>


<img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-27997" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Paul-Paraka-EMTV-News2-680wide.jpg" alt="" width="680" height="533" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Paul-Paraka-EMTV-News2-680wide.jpg 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Paul-Paraka-EMTV-News2-680wide-300x235.jpg 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Paul-Paraka-EMTV-News2-680wide-536x420.jpg 536w" sizes="(max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px"/>Lawyer Paul Paraka with his lawsuit documents at the weekend. Image: Screen grab from EMTV News


<div class="td-a-rec td-a-rec-id-content_inlineleft td-rec-hide-on-m td-rec-hide-on-tl td-rec-hide-on-tp td-rec-hide-on-p">


<div class="c3">


<p class="c2"><small>-Partners-</small></p>


</div>


</div>




<p>Paraka, who once owned one of the biggest law firms in the country prior to the controversial saga, said it was now his time to “declare war” on the state through the powers of the rule of law, seeking damages and justice from the court.</p>




<p>He said he was seeking orders from the court to invalidate all actions of the National Executive Council (NEC) and Task Force Sweep team and is seeking damages and compensation for the total loss of business, and seeks compensation from individual government officials and the state for almost half of the country’s annual budget allocation from a different category of damages.</p>




<p>During a media brief at the weekend, Paraka said he went to court to seek imprisonment terms imposed on those responsible. Section 23 deals with an abuse of the Constitution, imposing a jail term of up to 10 years.</p>




<p><strong>Arrested and charged</strong><br />Paraka was arrested and charged by the Task Force Sweep team in October 2013 in relation to the payment of legal costs by the state which were claimed to have been paid when there was a Supreme Court restraining order in place.</p>




<p>Paraka Lawyers had branches in all the 22 provinces with its headquarters occupying three floors at the Mogoru Moto Building in the capital of Port Moresby, and employed close to 2000 employees.</p>




<p>Paul Paraka said his company undertook over 6000 legal briefs for the state for a period of seven years from the year 2000, resulting in more than 30,000 legal invoices rendered to the state and were paid.</p>




<p>He said the payments, the subject of the allegations, were properly and lawfully authorised by the former Attorney-General and Solicitor-General for payment.</p>




<p>A National Court Order also authorised the payments.</p>




<p>Paraka said the sweep team alleged foul in the payments, alleging there was a Supreme Court order.</p>




<p>“If there was a Supreme Court order then it should have been a breach of contempt of court offence and is not a criminal offence,” Elapa quoted Paraka as saying.</p>




<p><strong>Sweep team ‘wrong’</strong><br />Paraka told the <em>Post-Courier</em> the sweep team was wrong, there was no Supreme Court order restraining the payment and that the National Court order that directed the payment was not challenged by the state.</p>




<p>He said the five NEC decisions to appoint a sweep team were unlawful and unconstitutional and also did not give any specific instructions to investigate Paul Paraka Lawyers.</p>




<p>He said as a result he was “destroyed badly” and went through “one of the hardest times in life” and was now seeking justice to get his business and his money back and to get his name cleared.</p>




<div class="printfriendly pf-alignleft"><a href="#" rel="nofollow" onclick="window.print(); return false;" class="noslimstat" title="Printer Friendly, PDF &#038; Email"><img decoding="async" class="c4" src="https://cdn.printfriendly.com/buttons/printfriendly-pdf-button.png" alt="Print Friendly, PDF &#038; Email"/></a></div>




<p>Article by <a href="http://www.asiapacificreport.nz/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">AsiaPacificReport.nz</a></p>

]]&gt;				</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
