<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polarisation &#8211; Evening Report</title>
	<atom:link href="https://eveningreport.nz/category/asia-pacific-report/polarisation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://eveningreport.nz</link>
	<description>Independent Analysis and Reportage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:18:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>New survey finds an alarming tolerance for attacks on the press in the US – particularly among white, Republican men</title>
		<link>https://eveningreport.nz/2024/11/07/new-survey-finds-an-alarming-tolerance-for-attacks-on-the-press-in-the-us-particularly-among-white-republican-men/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Asia Pacific Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fake news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrity of information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media polarisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIL-OSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polarisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety of journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targeting of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US presidential election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US presidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eveningreport.nz/2024/11/07/new-survey-finds-an-alarming-tolerance-for-attacks-on-the-press-in-the-us-particularly-among-white-republican-men/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ANALYSIS: By Julie Posetti, City St George’s, University of London and Waqas Ejaz, University of Oxford Press freedom is a pillar of American democracy. But political attacks on US-based journalists and news organisations pose an unprecedented threat to their safety and the integrity of information. Less than 48 hours before election day, Donald Trump, now ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ANALYSIS:</strong> <em>By <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/julie-posetti-3353" rel="nofollow">Julie Posetti</a>, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/city-st-georges-university-of-london-1047" rel="nofollow">City St George’s, University of London</a> and <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/waqas-ejaz-2251174" rel="nofollow">Waqas Ejaz</a>, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/university-of-oxford-1260" rel="nofollow">University of Oxford</a></em></p>
<p>Press freedom is a pillar of American democracy. But political attacks on US-based journalists and news organisations pose an unprecedented threat to their safety and the integrity of information.</p>
<p>Less than 48 hours before election day, Donald Trump, now President-elect for a second term, told a rally of his supporters that he wouldn’t mind if someone shot the journalists in front of him.</p>
<p>“I have this piece of glass here, but all we have really over here is the fake news. And to get me, somebody would have to shoot through the fake news. And I don’t mind that so much,” <a href="https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-campaign-defends-remarks-violence-journalists/story?id=115449625" rel="nofollow">he said</a>.</p>
<p>A new survey from the <a href="https://www.icfj.org/our-work/disarming-disinformation-empowering-truth" rel="nofollow">International Center for Journalists (ICFJ)</a> highlights a disturbing tolerance for political bullying of the press in the land of the First Amendment. The findings show that this is especially true among white, male, Republican voters.</p>
<p>We commissioned this nationally representative survey of 1020 US adults, which was fielded between June 24 and July 5 2024, to assess Americans’ attitudes to the press ahead of the election. We are publishing the results here for the first time.</p>
<p>More than one-quarter (27 percent) of the Americans we polled said they had often seen or heard a journalist being threatened, harassed or abused online. And more than one-third (34 percent) said they thought it was appropriate for senior politicians and government officials to criticise journalists and news organisations.</p>
<p>Tolerance for political targeting of the press appears as polarised as American society. Nearly half (47 percent) of the Republicans surveyed approved of senior politicians critiquing the press, compared to less than one-quarter (22 percent) of Democrats.</p>
<p>Our analysis also revealed divisions according to gender and ethnicity. While 37 percent of white-identifying respondents thought it was appropriate for political leaders to target journalists and news organisations, only 27 percent of people of colour did. There was also a nine-point difference along gender lines, with 39 percent of men approving of this conduct, compared to 30 percent of women.</p>
<p>It appears intolerance towards the press has a face — a predominantly white, male and Republican-voting face.</p>
<p><strong>Press freedom fears<br /></strong> This election campaign, Trump has repeated his blatantly false claim that journalists are “<a href="https://www.salon.com/2024/10/24/enemy-of-the-people-press-at-arizona-rally/" rel="nofollow">enemies of the people</a>”. He has suggested that reporters who cross him <a href="https://www.c-span.org/video/?539063-1/president-trump-campaigns-aurora-colorado" rel="nofollow">should be jailed</a>, and signalled that he would like to <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtvhFTLso40&#038;t=26s" rel="nofollow">revoke broadcast licences</a> of networks.</p>
<p>Relevant, too, is the enabling environment for viral attacks on journalists created by unregulated social media companies which represent a <a href="https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000383044" rel="nofollow">clear threat</a> to press freedom and the safety of journalists. <a href="https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377223" rel="nofollow">Previous research</a> produced by ICFJ for Unesco concluded that there was a causal relationship between online violence towards women journalists and physical attacks.</p>
<p>While political actors may be the perpetrators of abuse targeting journalists, social media companies have <a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/30/opinions/maria-ressa-facebook-intl-hnk/index.html" rel="nofollow">facilitated</a> their viral spread, heightening the risk to journalists.</p>
<p>We’ve seen a potent example of this in the current campaign, when Haitian Times editor Macollvie J. Neel was <a href="https://pen.org/press-release/pen-america-condemns-threats-against-staff-of-the-haitian-times-after-coverage-of-springfield-oh-anti-haitian-conspiracy-theories/" rel="nofollow">“swatted”</a> — meaning police were dispatched to her home after a fraudulent report of a murder at the address — during an episode of severely racist online violence.</p>
<p>The trigger? <a href="https://haitiantimes.com/2024/09/11/haitian-immigrants-in-ohio-under-racist-attacks/" rel="nofollow">Her reporting</a> on Trump and JD Vance <a href="https://www.npr.org/2024/09/15/nx-s1-5113140/vance-false-claims-haitian-migrants-pets" rel="nofollow">amplifying false claims</a> that Haitian immigrants were eating their neighbours’ pets.</p>
<p><strong>Trajectory of Trump attacks<br /></strong> Since the 2016 election, Trump has repeatedly discredited independent reporting on his campaign. He has weaponised the term “<a href="https://www.icfj.org/sites/default/files/2018-07/A%20Short%20Guide%20to%20History%20of%20Fake%20News%20and%20Disinformation_ICFJ%20Final.pdf" rel="nofollow">fake news</a>” and accused the media of “rigging” elections.</p>
<p>“The election is being rigged by corrupt media pushing completely false allegations and outright lies in an effort to elect [Hillary Clinton] president,” <a href="https://money.cnn.com/2016/10/15/media/donald-trump-media-journalists/" rel="nofollow">he said</a> in 2016. With hindsight, such accusations foreshadowed his false claims of election fraud in 2020, and similar preemptive claims in 2024.</p>
<p>His <a href="https://rsf.org/en/usa-trump-verbally-attacked-media-more-100-times-run-election" rel="nofollow">increasingly virulent attacks</a> on journalists and news organisations are <a href="https://www.icfj.org/our-work/chilling-global-study-online-violence-against-women-journalists" rel="nofollow">amplified</a> by his supporters online and far-right media. Trump has effectively licensed attacks on American journalists through anti-press rhetoric and undermined respect for press freedom.</p>
<p>In 2019, the Committee to Protect Journalists <a href="https://cpj.org/2019/01/trump-twitter-press-fake-news-enemy-people/" rel="nofollow">found that more than 11 percent</a> of 5400 tweets posted by Trump between the date of his 2016 candidacy and January 2019 “. . . insulted or criticised journalists and outlets, or condemned and denigrated the news media as a whole”.</p>
<p>After being temporarily deplatformed from Twitter for breaching community standards, Trump launched Truth Social, where he continues to abuse his critics uninterrupted. But he recently rejoined the platform (now X), and held a series of campaign events with X owner and Trump backer <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/nov/02/elon-musk-donald-trump-us-presidential-elections" rel="nofollow">Elon Musk</a>.</p>
<p>The failed insurrection on January 6, 2021, rammed home the scale of the escalating threats facing American journalists. During the riots at the Capitol, at least 18 journalists <a href="https://pressfreedomtracker.us/all-incidents/?date_lower=2021-01-06&#038;date_upper=2021-01-06&#038;state=District+of+Columbia&#038;tags=protest&#038;categories=Assault" rel="nofollow">were assaulted</a> and reporting equipment valued at tens of thousands of dollars was destroyed.</p>
<p>This election cycle, Reporters Without Borders <a href="https://rsf.org/en/usa-trump-verbally-attacked-media-more-100-times-run-election" rel="nofollow">logged 108 instances</a> of Trump insulting, attacking or threatening the news media in public speeches or offline remarks over an eight-week period ending on October 24.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the Freedom of the Press Foundation has <a href="https://pressfreedomtracker.us/all-incidents/?date_lower=2024-01-01&#038;categories=Assault&#038;endpage=5" rel="nofollow">recorded 75 assaults</a> on journalists since January 1 this year. That’s a 70% increase on the number of assaults captured by their press freedom tracker in 2023.</p>
<p>A <a href="https://www.iwmf.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Journalists-Under-Fire_IWMF_NSAA-Report_2024-I.pdf" rel="nofollow">recent survey</a> of hundreds of journalists undertaking safety training provided by the International Women’s Media Foundation found that 36 percent of respondents reported being threatened with or experiencing physical violence. One-third reported exposure to digital violence, and 28 percent reported legal threats or action against them.</p>
<p>US journalists involved in ongoing ICFJ research have told us that they have felt particularly at risk covering Trump rallies and reporting on the election from communities hostile towards the press. Some are wearing protective flak jackets to cover domestic politics. Others have removed labels identifying their outlets from their reporting equipment to reduce the risk of being physically attacked.</p>
<p>And yet, our survey reveals a distinct lack of public concern about the First Amendment implications of political leaders threatening, harassing, or abusing journalists. Nearly one-quarter (23 percent) of Americans surveyed did not regard political attacks on journalists or news organisations as a threat to press freedom. Among them, 38 percent identified as Republicans compared to just 9 percent* as Democrats.</p>
<p><strong>The anti-press playbook<br /></strong> Trump’s anti-press playbook appeals to a global audience of authoritarians. Other <a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/08/trump-fake-news-despots-287129" rel="nofollow">political strongmen</a>, from Brazil to Hungary and the <a href="https://www.icfj.org/our-work/maria-ressa-big-data-analysis" rel="nofollow">Philippines</a>, have adopted similar tactics of deploying disinformation to smear and threaten journalists and news outlets.</p>
<p>Such an approach imperils journalists while undercutting trust in facts and critical independent journalism.</p>
<p>History shows that <a href="https://www.salon.com/2019/06/09/trump-the-lying-press-and-the-nazis-attacking-the-media-has-a-history/" rel="nofollow">fascism thrives</a> when journalists cannot safely and freely do the work of holding governments and political leaders to account. As our research findings show, the consequences are a society accepting lies and fiction as facts while turning a blind eye to attacks on the press.</p>
<p><em>*The people identifying as Democrats in this sub-group are too few to make this a reliable representative estimate.</em></p>
<p><em>Note: Nabeelah Shabbir (ICFJ deputy director of research) and Kaylee Williams (ICFJ research associate) also contributed to this article and the research underpinning it. The survey was conducted by Langer Research Associates in English and Spanish. ICFJ researchers co-developed the survey and conducted the analysis.</em> </p>
<p><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/julie-posetti-3353" rel="nofollow"><em>Dr Julie Posetti</em></a><em>, Global Director of Research, International Center for Journalists (ICFJ) and Professor of Journalism, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/city-st-georges-university-of-london-1047" rel="nofollow">City St George’s, University of London</a> and <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/waqas-ejaz-2251174" rel="nofollow">Waqas Ejaz</a>, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Oxford Climate Journalism Network, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/university-of-oxford-1260" rel="nofollow">University of Oxford.</a> This article is republished from <a href="https://theconversation.com" rel="nofollow">The Conversation</a> under a Creative Commons licence. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/new-survey-finds-an-alarming-tolerance-for-attacks-on-the-press-in-the-us-particularly-among-white-republican-men-242719" rel="nofollow">original article</a>.</em></p>
<div class="printfriendly pf-button pf-button-content pf-alignleft"><a href="#" rel="nofollow" onclick="window.print(); return false;" title="Printer Friendly, PDF &#038; Email"> </a></div>
<p>Article by <a href="https://www.asiapacificreport.nz/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">AsiaPacificReport.nz</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polarised media undermines democracy, professor warns at Pacific media conference</title>
		<link>https://eveningreport.nz/2024/07/25/polarised-media-undermines-democracy-professor-warns-at-pacific-media-conference/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Asia Pacific Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 04:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cherian George]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji coups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media conventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media polarisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIL-OSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media 2024]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Conference 2024]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polarisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social harmony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suspension of democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Varieties of Democracy Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eveningreport.nz/2024/07/25/polarised-media-undermines-democracy-professor-warns-at-pacific-media-conference/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Kaneta Naimatau in Suva In a democracy, citizens must critically evaluate issues based on facts. However in a very polarised society, people focus more on who is speaking than what is being said. This was highlighted by journalism Professor Cherian George of the Hong Kong Baptist University as he delivered his keynote address during ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>By Kaneta Naimatau in Suva</em></p>
<p>In a democracy, citizens must critically evaluate issues based on facts. However in a very polarised society, people focus more on who is speaking than what is being said.</p>
<p>This was highlighted by journalism Professor Cherian George of the Hong Kong Baptist University as he delivered his keynote address during the recent 2024 Pacific International Media Conference at the Holiday Inn, Suva.</p>
<p>According to Professor George when a media outlet is perceived as representing the “other side”, its journalism is swiftly condemned — adding “it won’t be believed, regardless of its professionalism and quality.”</p>
<figure id="attachment_96982" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-96982" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/category/pacific-media-conference-2024/" rel="nofollow"> </a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-96982" class="wp-caption-text"><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/category/pacific-media-conference-2024/" rel="nofollow"><strong>PACIFIC MEDIA CONFERENCE 4-6 JULY 2024</strong></a></figcaption></figure>
<p>Professor George, an author and award-winning journalism academic was among many high-profile journalists and academics gathered at the three-day conference from July 4-6 — the first of its kind in the region in almost two decades.</p>
<p>The gathering of academics, media professionals, policymakers and civil society organisation representatives was organised by The University of the South Pacific in partnership with the Pacific Islands News Association (PINA) and the <a href="http://apmn.nz" rel="nofollow">Asia-Pacific Media Network (APMN)</a>.</p>
<p>Addressing an audience of 12 countries from the Asia Pacific region, Professor George said polarisation was a threat to democracy and institutions such as the media and universities.</p>
<p>“While democracy requires faith in the process and a willingness to compromise, polarization is associated with an uncompromising attitude, treating opponents as the enemy and attacking the system, bringing it down if you do not get in your way,” he said.</p>
<p><strong>Fiji coups context</strong><br />In the context of Fiji — which has experienced four coups, Professor George said the country had seen a steady decrease in political polarisation since 2000, according to data from the Varieties of Democracy Institute (VDI).</p>
<p>He said the decrease was due to government policies aimed at neutralising ethnic-based political organisations at the time. However, he warned against viewing Fiji’s experience as justification for autocratic approaches to social harmony.</p>
<p>“Some may look at this [VDI data] and argue that the Fiji case demonstrates that you sometimes need strongman rule and a temporary suspension of democracy to save it from itself, but the problem is that this is a highly risky formula,” he explained.</p>
<figure id="attachment_2739" class="wp-caption" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-2739" data-wp-editing="1"/>
<p>Professor George acknowledged that while the government had a role in countering polarisation through top-down attempts, there was also a need for a “bottom-up counter-polarising work done by media and civil society.”</p>
<figure id="attachment_104033" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-104033" class="wp-caption alignright"><figcaption id="caption-attachment-104033" class="wp-caption-text">Professor Cherian George delivers his keynote address at the 2024 Pacific International Media Conference at the Holiday Inn, Suva. Image: David Robie/Asia Pacific Media Network</figcaption></figure>
<p>Many professional journalists feel uncomfortable with the idea of intervening or taking a stand, Professor George said, labelling them as mirrors.</p>
<p>“However, if news outlets are really a mirror, it’s always a cracked mirror, pointing in a certain direction and not another,” he said.</p>
<p>“The media are always going to impact on reality, even as they report it objectively.</p>
<p><strong>Trapped by conventions</strong><br />“It’s better to acknowledge this so that your impact isn’t making things worse than they need to be. There’s ample research showing how even when the media are free to do their own thing, they are trapped by conventions and routines that accentuate polarisation,” he explained.</p>
<p>Professor George highlighted three key issues that exacerbate polarisation in media:</p>
<ul>
<li>Stereotypes — journalists often rely on stereotypes about different groups of people because it makes their storytelling easier and quicker;</li>
<li>Elite focus — journalists treat prominent leaders as more newsworthy than ordinary people the leaders represent; and</li>
<li>Media bias — journalists prefer to report on conflict or bad news as the public pay most attention to them.</li>
</ul>
<p>As a result, this has created an imbalance in the media and influenced people how they perceive their social world, the professor said.</p>
<p>“They may come to believe that different communities in their society do not get along, since that’s what their media, all their media, regardless of political leaning, tell them every day,” Professor George explained, adding, “this perception can be self-fulfilling”.</p>
<p>To counter these tendencies, he pointed to reform movements such as peace and solutions journalism which aim to shift attention to grassroots priorities and possibilities for cooperation.</p>
<p>“We must at least agree on one thing,” he concluded. “We all possess a shared humanity and equal dignity, and this is something I hope all media and media educators in the Pacific region, around the world, regardless of political position, can work towards.”</p>
<p><strong>Opening remarks</strong><br />The conference opening day featured remarks from Associate Professor Shailendra Singh, head of the USP Journalism Programme and conference chair, and Dr Matthew Hayward, acting head of the School of Pacific Arts, Communications, and Education (SPACE).</p>
<p>The Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Trade, Co-operatives, Small and Medium Enterprises and Communications, Manoa Kamikamica was the chief guest. Professor Cherian George delivered the keynote address.</p>
<p>Professor George is currently a professor of Media Studies and has published several books focusing on media and politics in Singapore and Southeast Asia. He also serves as director of the Centre for Media and Communication Research at the Hong Kong Baptist University.</p>
<p>The conference was sponsored the United States Embassy in Fiji, Kiribati, Nauru, Tonga and Tuvalu, the International Fund for Public Interest Media, the Pacific Media Assistance Scheme, Fiji Women’s Rights Movement, New Zealand Science Media Centre and the Pacific Women Lead — Pacific Community.</p>
<p>The event had more than 100 attendees from 12 countries — Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Tonga, Cook Islands, Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Indonesia, Philippines, Solomon Islands, the United States and Hong Kong.</p>
<p>It provided a platform for the 51 presenters to discuss the theme of the conference “Navigating Challenges and Shaping Futures in Pacific Media Research and Practice” and their ideas on the way forward.</p>
<p>An official dinner held on July 4 included the launch of the <a href="https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/issue/view/49" rel="nofollow">30th anniversary edition of the <em>Pacific Journalism Review</em> <em>(PJR)</em></a>, founded by former USP journalism head professor David Robie in 1994, and launch of the book <em><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2024/07/14/groundbreaking-book-waves-of-change-launched-at-pacific-media-conference-in-fiji/" rel="nofollow">Waves of Change: Media, Peace, and Development in the Pacific</a>,</em> which is edited by associate professor Singh, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance Professor Biman Prasad, and Dr Amit Sarwal, a former senior lecturer and deputy head of school (research) at USP.</p>
<p>The <em>PJR</em> is the only academic journal in the region that publishes research specifically focused on Pacific media.</p>
<p>A selection of the best conference papers will be published in a special edition of the <a href="https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/" rel="nofollow"><em>Pacific Journalism Review</em></a> or its companion publication <a href="https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-media-monographs/pmm/index" rel="nofollow"><em>Pacific Media Monographs</em></a>.</p>
<p><em>Kaneta Naimatau is a final-year student journalist at The University of the South Pacific. Republished in partnership with USP.<br /></em></p>
<div class="printfriendly pf-button pf-button-content pf-alignleft"><a href="#" rel="nofollow" onclick="window.print(); return false;" title="Printer Friendly, PDF &#038; Email"> </a></div>
<p>Article by <a href="https://www.asiapacificreport.nz/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">AsiaPacificReport.nz</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jacinda Ardern’s legacy for NZ: Unique covid-19 strategy ‘saved many lives’</title>
		<link>https://eveningreport.nz/2023/04/05/jacinda-arderns-legacy-for-nz-unique-covid-19-strategy-saved-many-lives/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Asia Pacific Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2023 04:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[covid-19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distrust of government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global pandemic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helen Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacinda Ardern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacinda Ardern legacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIL-OSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pandemic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polarisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QAnon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNZ Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saving lives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eveningreport.nz/2023/04/05/jacinda-arderns-legacy-for-nz-unique-covid-19-strategy-saved-many-lives/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[RNZ News Jacinda Ardern will largely be remembered in Aotearoa New Zealand as the prime minister whose pandemic-era policies saved thousands of Kiwi lives, according to former prime minister Helen Clark. And she will also be considered an example of how to govern in the age of social media and endless crises, political experts say, ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/" rel="nofollow"><em>RNZ News</em></a></p>
<p>Jacinda Ardern will largely be remembered in Aotearoa New Zealand as the prime minister whose pandemic-era policies saved thousands of Kiwi lives, according to former prime minister Helen Clark.</p>
<p>And she will also be considered an example of how to govern in the age of social media and endless crises, political experts say, while also achieving more than her critics might give her credit for.</p>
<p>Ardern was set to deliver her valedictory speech later today, having stepped down as prime minister earlier this year after just over five years in the job.</p>
<p>“I think that while I’m happy for Jacinda that she’s going to get a life and design what she wants to do and when she wants to do it, you can’t help feeling sad about her going,” Clark, herself a former Labour prime minister, told RNZ <em>Morning Report</em> ahead of Ardern’s speech.</p>
<p>“Leaders like Jacinda don’t come along too often and we’ve lost one.”</p>
<p>Ardern has played down suggestions online vitriol played a part in her decision to stand aside — but <a href="https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/04/jacinda-ardern-exit-interview-former-prime-minister-says-fear-of-losing-election-didn-t-lead-to-resignation-admits-thinking-standing-down-might-take-heat-out-of-debate.html" rel="nofollow">acknowledged on Tuesday</a> she hoped her departure would “take a bit of heat out” of the conversation.</p>
<p>Clark said she “fundamentally” believed the hatred got to Ardern, powered by “populism and division” generated by former US President Donald Trump and his supporters.</p>
<p><strong>‘Conspiracies took hold’</strong><br />“Conspiracies took hold and suddenly you know, as the pandemic wore on here, I think the sort of relentless barrage from America — not, not just through Trump himself and the reporting of him, but through the social media networks — we have the anti-science people, the people who completely distrusted public authority, the QAnon conspiracies and hey, it played out on our Parliament’s front lawn and it still plays out and it’s very, very vitriolic and divisive.</p>
<p>“So I think that that spillover impact was really quite, well, not just unpleasant — it was horrible.”</p>
<figure id="attachment_86757" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-86757" class="wp-caption alignright"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="wp-image-86757 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Jacinda-Ardern-NZH-front-page-050423-300tall.jpg" alt="Former PM Jacinda Ardern on the front page of the New Zealand Herald today" width="300" height="375" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Jacinda-Ardern-NZH-front-page-050423-300tall.jpg 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Jacinda-Ardern-NZH-front-page-050423-300tall-240x300.jpg 240w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px"/><figcaption id="caption-attachment-86757" class="wp-caption-text">Former PM Jacinda Ardern on the front page of the New Zealand Herald today . . . revealing her next move. Image: Screenshot APR</figcaption></figure>
<p>Researchers have found Ardern <a href="https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/482961/nine-out-of-10-hateful-posts-tracked-in-darkest-corners-of-the-internet-targeted-ardern-new-study" rel="nofollow">was a lightning rod for online hate</a>.</p>
<p>The perpetrator of the 2019 mosque shootings used the internet to connect with and learn from other extremists, which led to Ardern setting up the Christchurch Call movement to eliminate terrorist and violent extremist content online.</p>
<p>Her post-parliamentary career will include continuing that work, <a href="https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/487340/former-pm-jacinda-ardern-appointed-as-christchurch-call-envoy" rel="nofollow">as New Zealand’s Special Envoy for the Christchurch Call</a>, reporting to her replacement, Prime Minister Chris Hipkins.</p>
<p>“The mosque murders was just the most horrible thing to have happen on anyone’s watch, and she rose to the occasion, and I think the international reputation was very much associated with initially the empathy that she showed at that time,” said Clark.</p>
<p>But “one of New Zealand’s darkest days”, as Ardern put it at the time, was not the only <a href="https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/482811/communities-look-back-on-jacinda-ardern-s-handling-of-crises-history-will-judge-her-well" rel="nofollow">near-unparalleled crisis</a> she had to deal with in her time as prime minister.</p>
<p>“The White Island tragedy was another that needed, you know, very empathetic and careful handling. But then comes covid, and there’s no doubt that thousands of people are alive today because of the steps taken, particularly in 2020.</p>
<p><strong>‘Would we have survived?’</strong><br />“You know, I mean, I’m obviously in the older age group now which is more vulnerable. My father is 101 now and has survived the pandemic. But would we have survived it if it had been allowed to rip through our community, like it was allowed to rip through others?</p>
<p>“I think that there’d be so many New Zealanders not alive today had those steps not been taken.”</p>
<p>Data shows New Zealand has actually experienced negative excess mortality over the past few years — the elimination strategy so successful, fewer Kiwis have died than would have if there was no pandemic.</p>
<p>Former Director-General of Health Dr Ashley Bloomfield <a href="https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/486666/negative-excess-mortality-sign-nz-got-it-right-with-covid-19-response-sir-ashley-bloomfield" rel="nofollow">said that was “unique, virtually unique around the world”</a>.</p>
<p>Despite that, it was New Zealand’s aggressive approach towards covid-19 in 2020 and 2021 that arguably drove much of the polarisation and online vitriol.</p>
<p>“There’s no doubt that those measures did save lives. They also drove people into frenzied levels of opposition and fear and isolation,” said Clark. “They felt polarised, they felt locked out.”</p>
<p>But she said Ardern bore “very little” responsibility for that.</p>
<div class="photo-captioned photo-captioned-full photo-cntr eight_col">
<figure class="wp-caption alignnone"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" src="https://rnz-ressh.cloudinary.com/image/upload/s--tVKXvs3s--/ar_16:10,c_fill,f_auto,g_auto,q_auto,w_1050/v1674164830/4LEW3HG_Clark_jpg" alt="UNDP head Helen Clark poses in Paris on June 1, 2015" width="1050" height="698"/><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Former PM Helen Clark . . . “There’s no doubt that those measures did save lives.” Image: RNZ News/AFP</figcaption></figure>
</div>
<p>Political scientist Dr Bronwyn Hayward of the University of Canterbury said Ardern’s Christchurch Call to eliminate extremist content will have a long-lasting impact on not just New Zealand, but the world.</p>
<p>“There’s been a lot made about the fact that she resigned under pressure from the trolls, which is completely missing the point that what she’s saying is that in this era where we’ve got particularly Russian, but also other countries’ bots that are attacking liberal leaders,” Dr Hayward told <em>Morning Report</em>, saying Ardern was the first global leader to “really understand” how what happens online can spill over into the real world.</p>
<p>“She understands that democracies are now under attack, and the front line is your social media, where we’ve got a propaganda war coming internationally.</p>
<p>“So she’s taken a very systemic approach to thinking about how to tackle that, so that in local communities it feels like you’re reeling from Islamophobia, to racism to transphobia, but actually, when we look internationally at what’s happening, naive and quite disaffected groups have been constantly fed this material and she’s taken a systemic approach to it.”</p>
<p>Clark said one of the biggest differences in the world between Ardern’s time as prime minister and her own, was that she did not have to deal with social media.</p>
<p>“I didn’t have a Twitter account, didn’t know what it was really. We had texts, that was about it. We used to have pagers, for heaven’s sake.”</p>
<p><strong>Ardern’s domestic legacy<br /></strong> One of the first things Hipkins did when he took over as prime minister was the <a href="https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/03/pm-s-policy-bonfire-chris-hipkins-defends-scrapping-series-of-climate-policies.html" rel="nofollow">“policy bonfire”</a> — but critics have long said the Ardern-led government has had trouble delivering on its promises.</p>
<p>Interviewer Guyon Espiner reminded Clark that her government had brought in long-lasting changes like Working for Families, the NZ Super Fund and Kiwibank — asking her what Ardern could point to.</p>
<p>Clark defended Ardern, saying the coalition arrangement with NZ First in Ardern’s first term slowed any reform agenda she might have had, and then there was covid-19.</p>
<p>“Looking back, there needs to be more recognition that the pandemic blindsided governments, communities, publics around the world. It wasn’t easy.”</p>
<p>Dr Hayward pointed to the ban on new oil and gas exploration and child poverty monitoring, “which before that was ruled as impossible or too difficult”.</p>
<p>Dr Lara Greaves, a political scientist at the University of Auckland, said it was “incredibly hard to really evaluate” Ardern’s legacy outside of covid-19.</p>
<p>“Ultimately … she is the covid-19 prime minister.”</p>
<div class="photo-captioned photo-captioned-full photo-cntr eight_col" readability="7">
<figure class="wp-caption alignnone"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" src="https://rnz-ressh.cloudinary.com/image/upload/s--esdmExGm--/ar_16:10,c_fill,f_auto,g_auto,q_auto,w_1050/v1644500240/4M3RZ1Q_copyright_image_275682" alt="Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern" width="1050" height="683"/><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Former PM Jacinda Ardern at a covid-19 press conference. Image: RNZ News/Pool/NZ Herald/Mark Mitchell</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>The future<br /></strong> Clark said Ardern would be emotional during her valedictory speech.</p>
</div>
<p>“You have very close relationships with colleagues, you have relationships with others of a different kind — with the opposition, with the media, with the public — and you’re walking away, you’re closing the door on it.</p>
<p>“But you know that a new chapter will open, and that life post-politics can be very rewarding. I’ve certainly found it so. I have no doubt that Jacinda will get back into her stride with doing things that she feels are worthwhile for the the general public and worthwhile for her.”</p>
<p>After losing the 2008 election, Clark rose the ranks at the United Nations. She said while that was an option for Ardern, there is plenty of time for the 42-year-old to do other things first.</p>
<p>“I was, you know, 58 when I left being prime minister. And Jacinda’s leaving in her early 40s and she has a young child, so who knows? She may want Neve to grow up with a good old Kiwi upbringing.</p>
<p>“And she may want her, you know, involvement internationally to be more, you know, forays out from New Zealand. That’s for her to decide. I mean, the world’s her oyster, if she chooses to follow that.”</p>
<p>Dr Greaves also pointed to Ardern’s relative youth.</p>
<p>“It seems like she’s going for a period of sort of recovery and reflection and figuring out what to do next. But of course, she’s got another 20 years in her career, at least — the world’s her oyster.”</p>
<p><em><em><span class="caption">This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.</span></em></em></p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" readability="9.6755852842809">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">As Jacinda Ardern gets ready to deliver her valedictory speech in the Parliament today, former prime minister Helen Clark says she will largely be remembered as the prime minister whose pandemic-era policies saved thousands of Kiwis’ lives. <a href="https://t.co/LhKPSZulpW" rel="nofollow">https://t.co/LhKPSZulpW</a></p>
<p>— RNZ (@radionz) <a href="https://twitter.com/radionz/status/1643423739315617792?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="nofollow">April 5, 2023</a></p>
</blockquote>
<div class="printfriendly pf-button pf-button-content pf-alignleft"><a href="#" rel="nofollow" onclick="window.print(); return false;" title="Printer Friendly, PDF &amp; Email"><img decoding="async" class="pf-button-img" src="https://cdn.printfriendly.com/buttons/printfriendly-pdf-button.png" alt="Print Friendly, PDF &amp; Email"/></a></div>
<p>Article by <a href="https://www.asiapacificreport.nz/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">AsiaPacificReport.nz</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former NZ PM Helen Clark calls for rethink on political debate in wake of Ardern resignation</title>
		<link>https://eveningreport.nz/2023/01/20/former-nz-pm-helen-clark-calls-for-rethink-on-political-debate-in-wake-of-ardern-resignation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Asia Pacific Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 05:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-vaxxers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helen Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacinda Ardern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIL-OSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polarisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNZ Morning Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNZ Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talkback radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trolling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tweets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vitriol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eveningreport.nz/2023/01/20/former-nz-pm-helen-clark-calls-for-rethink-on-political-debate-in-wake-of-ardern-resignation/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[RNZ News Aotearoa New Zealand has become hugely polarised and it is little wonder Jacinda Ardern has decided to call it a day, says Helen Clark. The former New Zealand prime minister and Labour Party leader is no stranger to the ups and downs of politics. However, she said current politicians faced vitriol 24/7 thanks ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/" rel="nofollow"><em>RNZ News</em></a></p>
<p>Aotearoa New Zealand has become hugely polarised and it is little wonder Jacinda Ardern has decided to call it a day, says Helen Clark.</p>
<p>The former New Zealand prime minister and Labour Party leader is no stranger to the ups and downs of politics. However, she said current politicians faced vitriol 24/7 thanks to social media.</p>
<p>She said Aotearoa was seeing some of the worst elements of US politics.</p>
<p>Clark, who is in Switzerland at present, said she awoke to find she had received dozens of messages on her phone and was stunned, but, after a moment of reflection, not surprised by Ardern’s decision.</p>
<p>“I’ve seen the public pressures of vitriol and mouthing against Jacinda in a very, very unfair way and at some point, as she said, you’re human, at some point you don’t have any gas left in the tank, and she’s made the call that is absolutely right for her and her family.”</p>
<p>While Clark faced a huge amount of unpleasant criticism during her nine years as prime minister, she told RNZ <em>Morning Report</em> social media had given it more licence.</p>
<p>“The amount of <a href="https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/482761/the-hatred-and-vitriol-jacinda-ardern-endured-would-affect-anybody" rel="nofollow">anonymous trolling and venomous commentary</a> is absolutely ghastly.</p>
<p><strong>‘Anti-vaxxers . . . extreme language’</strong><br />“I was going through the responses to the tweet I put up and the hate brigade is out in force — the anti-vaxxers, the people calling Jacinda a dictator, really just extreme and absurd language.”</p>
<p>In Clark’s time, talkback radio was the dominant outlet for people to express hateful views, but there was not the “24-hour trolling and viciousness on social media”.</p>
<p>Clark said she considered herself lucky to have led the country before the advent of social media which had made the role so much tougher.</p>
<p>She believed Ardern may have had an enjoyable summer and would have seriously considered if she could continue in the face of the antagonism she was experiencing.</p>
<p>The Waitangi Day barbecue had been cancelled late last year for security reasons and demonstrated the level of pressure the prime minister faced, Clark said.</p>
<p>Ardern’s programme could not be announced in advance because of the risk of “these militia-shouting crowds turn up”, she said.</p>
<p>“We haven’t experienced this in New Zealand for the most part. We’ve become very polarised. We’ve taken on a lot of the worst aspects of American politics, I think.</p>
<p><strong>‘Time for society to reflect’</strong><br />“So I think it is time to reflect as a society how we’re letting ourselves be so divided and polarised by this.”</p>
<p>Clark said normally mild-mannered people were proclaiming vicious views and the country did not used to be like this.</p>
<p>The covid-19 pandemic and the need for vaccinations had been a huge factor in the dissemination of extreme views.</p>
<p>Clark recalled going to school with a boy who had a withered leg, the result of polio, and there was a general acceptance of the need for vaccinations.</p>
<p>“It has been extraordinary to see this deterioration of basic science.”</p>
<p>She was not prepared to say publicly who should take over as Labour leader, but she was in no doubt there were well-qualified candidates within the caucus.</p>
<p><em><span class="caption"><em>This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.</em> </span></em></p>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/6dN6fhYCrBU" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen">[embedded content]</iframe></p>
<div class="printfriendly pf-button pf-button-content pf-alignleft"><a href="#" rel="nofollow" onclick="window.print(); return false;" title="Printer Friendly, PDF &amp; Email"><img decoding="async" class="pf-button-img c2" src="https://cdn.printfriendly.com/buttons/printfriendly-pdf-button.png" alt="Print Friendly, PDF &amp; Email"/></a></div>
<p>Article by <a href="https://www.asiapacificreport.nz/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">AsiaPacificReport.nz</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
